|
United States10397 Posts
Ok this is big. About 50% in a lot of these red rural counties reporting from Indiana: almost all of them have Trump under 70% right now and down a few points from this 2016 position.
Dekalb county: 2016 Trump 71-23. As of now: 68-30 Steuben: 2016: 70-26. Currently: 61-37.5
And the results look similar across the other counties as well. Biden clearly has drawn votes from 3rd party (the gain doesn't match the loss) and that could be great news for Biden.
|
On November 04 2020 08:24 FlaShFTW wrote: Ok this is big. About 50% in a lot of these red rural counties reporting from Indiana: almost all of them have Trump under 70% right now and down a few points from this 2016 position.
Dekalb county: 2016 Trump 71-23. As of now: 68-30 Steuben: 2016: 70-26. Currently: 61-37.5
And the results look similar across the other counties as well. Biden clearly has drawn votes from 3rd party (the gain doesn't match the loss) and that could be great news for Biden. This is what I want to see, keep it coming.
|
On November 04 2020 08:21 schaf wrote:Show nested quote +On November 04 2020 08:18 StasisField wrote:On November 04 2020 08:16 schaf wrote: Will polling stations let people in after closing time or is it a hard limit? If you are in line by the time the polling station is set to close, you will get to vote. To paraphrase Danglars: why? If you can't be bothered to show up in time and take into account the line, you don't deserve it. /s I would guess because America has a lot of people and more votes = better.
|
United States10397 Posts
Knox County: 2016 Trump won 71.5-24.3. Currently with 47% reporting: 64.3-34.3. Again, another dip for Trump, another big gain from Biden.
3rd party in Indiana was strong, votes for Johnson in 2016 ranged from 3-6% in some counties. I have yet to see Jojo be able 2% so far. She is hoving around 1.5% in most counties. That could translate to a gain of +4 for Biden from 3rd parties that did not vote for either party in 2016 and moved for Biden in 2020.
|
|
|
So far the only reporting is on states Trump's won though?
|
North Carolina result reporting will be delayed slightly in order for all polling stations to have been open the same amount of time.
|
![[image loading]](https://i.imgur.com/gFOqFBZ.png) Kentucky turning blue?
|
United States10397 Posts
On November 04 2020 08:31 iamthedave wrote: So far the only reporting is on states Trump's won though? Yes. Indiana and Kentucky are the first states to close their polling. All we have are these states and this is the only information I can draw on so far. But when I called 2016 early in the night for Trump last time I was watching, I was noticing some huge gains from Trump in a ton of formerly blue districts. If the trend here is that the vote is shifting back to Biden in a lot of these early counties, chances are the same thing will happen in similarly represented counties in states like Michigan, Wisconsin, even Ohio. Does it mean Biden is going to win in Ohio? Who knows for now, but he's certainly going to make a run at it.
|
Are early votes counted at same time as on the day votes , beforehand, after or does this vary by state?
|
Kentucky is blue on the politico map atm, it's over
|
United States10397 Posts
On November 04 2020 08:34 polgas wrote:![[image loading]](https://i.imgur.com/gFOqFBZ.png) Kentucky turning blue? My guy its 8% reporting.
|
Norway28796 Posts
|
That seems unlikely, but I'll be pretty wowed if true
|
Nah, a lot of Trump states will start blue out of the gates because of the initial flood of urban voting collections, all of which trend blue basically everywhere in the US. As the rural areas start being counted, the numbers shift.
|
I doubt Kentucky is turning blue but would be a big shock if Kentucky turns blue but it just 8% of expected votes atm so it's something to watch out for.
|
United States10397 Posts
On November 04 2020 08:36 farvacola wrote: Nah, a lot of Trump states will start blue out of the gates because of the initial flood of urban voting collections, all of which trend blue basically everywhere in the US. As the rural areas start being counted, the numbers shift. Indiana has not had a single urban place have votes come in just yet. It really just comes down to who displays results first. I remember when the votes were coming out early in 2016, Mississippi was blue at some point. These early results don't matter until a better representation for the state as a whole come out. This is why county-by-county analysis is much better. A state can have 10% reporting but a couple counties can be already at 70-80% reporting and give you good accurate stats to compare to last election or go off.
|
I came to report the same thing, Kentucky going blue would be a huge shift, and I hope they do.
|
Norway28796 Posts
While I am increasingly optimistic towards a blue wave happening, kentucky moving from 62%-33% to a democrat win is not in the realm of possibility. At least I don't see it as one.
|
United States10397 Posts
Boone County 2016: 60-31 Trump. Currently 70% reporting: 57-41. Biden gaining 10 points here again. He's averaging about a 7-10 point gain in a ton of counties right now.
|
|
|
|
|
|