|
Now that we have a new thread, in order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a complete and thorough read before posting! NOTE: When providing a source, please provide a very brief summary on what it's about and what purpose it adds to the discussion. The supporting statement should clearly explain why the subject is relevant and needs to be discussed. Please follow this rule especially for tweets.
Your supporting statement should always come BEFORE you provide the source.If you have any questions, comments, concern, or feedback regarding the USPMT, then please use this thread: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/website-feedback/510156-us-politics-thread |
On November 06 2021 23:14 WombaT wrote:Show nested quote +On November 06 2021 20:29 Slydie wrote:On November 06 2021 19:45 DarkPlasmaBall wrote: I'd be really interested in learning if these "math is racist" faux-CRT math lessons are based on new things actually outlined in school/state curricula, or if these lessons are created by individual math teachers attempting to come up with new applications for teaching general content and skills. Most American math curricula are very broad and allow a decent amount of autonomy for the teacher in terms of figuring out how the content should be best learned and the skills best developed in one's classroom.
For example, it's much more likely for a math curriculum to say "at around this grade level, students should begin to develop number sense in regards to percentages, decimals, and fractions, such as converting between the three, understanding mixed numbers and improper fractions, and learning about percent increase and percent decrease", and then just let the teacher figure out how they want to teach those things and what applications to use. If a teacher decides to give a data-driven lesson about how different groups of people might experience percent-increases or percent-decreases based on their identity (certain groups being charged more by car salespeople or loan officers on average, certain groups being offered less money for the same job on average, etc.), then the recognition/blame and costs/benefits of that lesson lie on the shoulders of that specific teacher.
Some teachers have really great, thoughtful, applicable lessons, some don't bother trying to make the math "current", and some are willing to experiment with new strategies and ideas and context to see if they'll get better results. We could talk about the merits of a hypothetical, specific math lesson plan created by a single teacher who's interested in simultaneously discussing equity while meeting a specific content or skill component in the broader curriculum, but that's very different than entire schools and states revamping their math departments to teach white kids that they should feel bad about themselves. I agree. Finland is famous for having the best education system in the world? Why? Because they put a lot of effort of making teachers proud of their profession and give them freedom to teach as they see fit. Politicians like to make changes in education, often to fit their agenda, and I think the left and right wing can be equally guilty: left for example by "value" based teaching and hampering the development of the best students by wanting everyone to be equally good. The right might overemphasize test results and hard, measurable skills. Reading and understanding statistics should be an important part of math, but I don't see why values like equality need to be a part of it. Misuse of numbers to fit an agenda happens everywhere. The only important values should be seeing through bullshit and forming a qualified opinion. I don’t think one can fully grasp statistical fuckery without bringing in the real world examples and complexity, and it can be quite an interesting way to deliver a multifaceted lesson. Not just politicians, people in general should, 99% of the time defer giving their opinion on education as it’s completely based in feeling and no evidence whatsoever. What are we wanting to accomplish with education and, once settled, based on our current best understanding how do people learn best. Simple when written like that, but a rather non-trivial problem and one honestly I don’t think many places have seriously attempted either, to my knowledge.
That's precisely the issue.
I agree with what you say. Statistical shitfuckery needs real world examples. Why take the most inflammatory one, which inevitably leads to problems - rather than using real world examples that aren't loaded as shit?
Here.
There's an example. It's gender neutral, race neutral, it's bloody neutral, and an incredible example of a manipulative statistic (it's btw real, released by the australian government).
There's a place and time for every topic. You don't teach the impact of paedophilia in sports class. You don't teach the pay gap in arts class. You teach it in the appropriate classes, and if you don't, you have an agenda.
Teaching a very important part of stochastic is hard enough, now try to teach it while also have an argument/discussion in your class what's racist and what isn't. You shift the focus from 100% stochastic (and ability to read, interpret and spot manipulative statistics/graphs) to maybe 50% stochastic, and 50%.. race? In math?
That's genuinely idiotic. Racism is an issue, nobody (well.. not me, anyway) is arguing that. As a science guy though, i absolutely would argue that bringing personal agendas (and to be clear, it's a personal agenda - the focus isn't on "manipulated graphs" but how they're used to oppress GH) into math is wrong.
|
United States41988 Posts
On November 06 2021 17:18 BlackJack wrote:Show nested quote +On November 06 2021 10:15 WombaT wrote:On November 06 2021 10:03 BlackJack wrote:On November 06 2021 09:19 WombaT wrote:On November 06 2021 06:31 BlackJack wrote:On November 06 2021 04:52 WombaT wrote:On November 06 2021 03:58 Mohdoo wrote:On November 06 2021 03:18 KwarK wrote: It’s as real as all the other made up persecution fantasies the right circle jerk over on Facebook. There isn’t a national problem of politically motivated persecution of white children in schools to address, just as there isn’t one of Christian persecution or conservative persecution or anything else. I mean for fucks sake, one of the examples of persecution you listed was limited spaces at a high demand school being given out using a lottery system in the name of fairness. So long as wine moms believe CRT is trying to make their kids feel ashamed of slavery, its a done deal. We don't get to choose the electorate, we can just work around it. Shaming white people is not a winning strategy. Just to be clear, my position is that CRT is very good and important and also a really bad idea because if you lose the election none of it matters. What is palatable at this point though? Just put up with ridiculously sensitive sensibilities in perpetuity and don’t attempt to do anything ever? I think yes, if CRT was actually being pushed as is being billed and little Billy is being told he should be ashamed for being white by his teacher, then yes I’m in agreement on messaging 100% ‘So long as x believes’ is a good maxim to go by if there’s some problem in communication that can reasonably be solved by better communication. To a point that is where x’s beliefs aren’t particularly reasonably held even after attempts at clarification. It people wish to object to ‘CRT’ based on what’s actually proposed and implemented, that’s their prerogative but we’re in a position of defending policies that well, basically don’t exist in the first place in the way people conceive, and even when corrected they’ll still double down. I mean not just here, should we not have passed the ACA because people believed there’d be death panels for the elderly, or more contemporaneously should we not roll out a vaccine program with mandates because some people don’t believe in vaccines, or hell Covid existing? There is also the other side of the ledger. Symbolic or structural tackling of racial inequity may get a whole load of blowback, but equally abandoning it will be very unpopular in other quarters. https://www.seattletimes.com/education-lab/new-course-outlines-prompt-conversations-about-identity-race-in-seattle-classrooms-even-in-math/Seattle public schools proposal to implement ethnic studies into their math class In math, lessons are more theoretical. Seattle’s recently released proposal includes questions like, “Where does Power and Oppression show up in our math experiences?” and “How is math manipulated to allow inequality and oppression to persist?” This is the crux of the issue - everything has to be seen through this lens of race, oppressors vs oppressed, privileged vs unprivilged, even in math class. It's what people are objecting to. No it doesn’t, and isn’t. In a U.S. history class, for example, histories of oppression, institutionalized racism, community organizing and resistance can be worked into the lesson plan, said Wayne Au, a professor at the University of Washington, Bothell, who has helped lead Seattle’s ethnic-studies initiative.
In math, lessons are more theoretical. Seattle’s recently released proposal includes questions like, “Where does Power and Oppression show up in our math experiences?” and “How is math manipulated to allow inequality and oppression to persist?”Example 1 yes, because that’s literally history. Example 2 well, no that’s silly, to a degree. Is it even remotely being adopted nationally in a commensurate way to the outrage? No it just isn’t. And to be clear here I’m fully on board with the idea that implementing that within a maths lesson is ridiculous, which it is. It absolutely, that aside doesn’t have to be seen through that lens, people just choose to do so. Attempts to redress problems may touch upon certain areas, the people proposing redress don’t do so through a framework of white people are awful, or merit isn’t important or whatever, for the most part. I’ve never, personally felt under any kind of attack for the ‘crime’ of being a straight cis white male, at all, ever. If other people want to feel that way it’s up to them, I don’t think it’s particularly backed up by anything tangible. It absolutely is part of a larger national trend to promote equity in schools. Perhaps it's not commensurate to the level of outrage, but it is happening. And what is the problem in promoting equity? It folks have issues in this domain go for it, but what are the objections and what are the specifics and why are you annoyed? If your pissed off that CRT is a huge part of the curriculum well, when it literally isn’t a part of the curriculum your point is fucking silly and redundant. The argument seemingly being that we placate these people with positions that on examination are completely out of kilter wiry actual reality. My point is it's not unreasonable to expect your kid to learn math in math class instead of how math is used as a tool to oppress people. Parents are rightly annoyed and they showed it at the polls. Also not sure why you are still calling it CRT when we all agreed that it's not CRT. Is this an example of something the Democrats support or a made up thing?
|
On November 06 2021 23:41 KwarK wrote:Show nested quote +On November 06 2021 17:18 BlackJack wrote:On November 06 2021 10:15 WombaT wrote:On November 06 2021 10:03 BlackJack wrote:On November 06 2021 09:19 WombaT wrote:On November 06 2021 06:31 BlackJack wrote:On November 06 2021 04:52 WombaT wrote:On November 06 2021 03:58 Mohdoo wrote:On November 06 2021 03:18 KwarK wrote: It’s as real as all the other made up persecution fantasies the right circle jerk over on Facebook. There isn’t a national problem of politically motivated persecution of white children in schools to address, just as there isn’t one of Christian persecution or conservative persecution or anything else. I mean for fucks sake, one of the examples of persecution you listed was limited spaces at a high demand school being given out using a lottery system in the name of fairness. So long as wine moms believe CRT is trying to make their kids feel ashamed of slavery, its a done deal. We don't get to choose the electorate, we can just work around it. Shaming white people is not a winning strategy. Just to be clear, my position is that CRT is very good and important and also a really bad idea because if you lose the election none of it matters. What is palatable at this point though? Just put up with ridiculously sensitive sensibilities in perpetuity and don’t attempt to do anything ever? I think yes, if CRT was actually being pushed as is being billed and little Billy is being told he should be ashamed for being white by his teacher, then yes I’m in agreement on messaging 100% ‘So long as x believes’ is a good maxim to go by if there’s some problem in communication that can reasonably be solved by better communication. To a point that is where x’s beliefs aren’t particularly reasonably held even after attempts at clarification. It people wish to object to ‘CRT’ based on what’s actually proposed and implemented, that’s their prerogative but we’re in a position of defending policies that well, basically don’t exist in the first place in the way people conceive, and even when corrected they’ll still double down. I mean not just here, should we not have passed the ACA because people believed there’d be death panels for the elderly, or more contemporaneously should we not roll out a vaccine program with mandates because some people don’t believe in vaccines, or hell Covid existing? There is also the other side of the ledger. Symbolic or structural tackling of racial inequity may get a whole load of blowback, but equally abandoning it will be very unpopular in other quarters. https://www.seattletimes.com/education-lab/new-course-outlines-prompt-conversations-about-identity-race-in-seattle-classrooms-even-in-math/Seattle public schools proposal to implement ethnic studies into their math class In math, lessons are more theoretical. Seattle’s recently released proposal includes questions like, “Where does Power and Oppression show up in our math experiences?” and “How is math manipulated to allow inequality and oppression to persist?” This is the crux of the issue - everything has to be seen through this lens of race, oppressors vs oppressed, privileged vs unprivilged, even in math class. It's what people are objecting to. No it doesn’t, and isn’t. In a U.S. history class, for example, histories of oppression, institutionalized racism, community organizing and resistance can be worked into the lesson plan, said Wayne Au, a professor at the University of Washington, Bothell, who has helped lead Seattle’s ethnic-studies initiative.
In math, lessons are more theoretical. Seattle’s recently released proposal includes questions like, “Where does Power and Oppression show up in our math experiences?” and “How is math manipulated to allow inequality and oppression to persist?”Example 1 yes, because that’s literally history. Example 2 well, no that’s silly, to a degree. Is it even remotely being adopted nationally in a commensurate way to the outrage? No it just isn’t. And to be clear here I’m fully on board with the idea that implementing that within a maths lesson is ridiculous, which it is. It absolutely, that aside doesn’t have to be seen through that lens, people just choose to do so. Attempts to redress problems may touch upon certain areas, the people proposing redress don’t do so through a framework of white people are awful, or merit isn’t important or whatever, for the most part. I’ve never, personally felt under any kind of attack for the ‘crime’ of being a straight cis white male, at all, ever. If other people want to feel that way it’s up to them, I don’t think it’s particularly backed up by anything tangible. It absolutely is part of a larger national trend to promote equity in schools. Perhaps it's not commensurate to the level of outrage, but it is happening. And what is the problem in promoting equity? It folks have issues in this domain go for it, but what are the objections and what are the specifics and why are you annoyed? If your pissed off that CRT is a huge part of the curriculum well, when it literally isn’t a part of the curriculum your point is fucking silly and redundant. The argument seemingly being that we placate these people with positions that on examination are completely out of kilter wiry actual reality. My point is it's not unreasonable to expect your kid to learn math in math class instead of how math is used as a tool to oppress people. Parents are rightly annoyed and they showed it at the polls. Also not sure why you are still calling it CRT when we all agreed that it's not CRT. Is this an example of something the Democrats support or a made up thing?
It's something that's undoubtedly coming from the "Left." Most of these ideas to promote social equity or social justice teachings are occurring in states like California, New York, Washington, etc. Teachers unions and school boards are traditionally strong allies with the Democrat party. There's at least a tacit support when Terry McCauliffe says parents shouldn't have input on what school boards decide to teach.
Is it being overblown because conservatives identified its a great political football to use against the Dems? Yeah, probably.
|
My question is, why does anyone even care about CRT at an academic level? If this was a theory proposed by one dude, and an ideologically motivated one at that, why put it at such a premium? It seems more like a theorycrafting idea. Has it been peer reviewed in any substantial way? Who cares?
If Jordan Peterson in the 90s put forth Critical Post Marxist Theory, and it sat swirling around in various universities and academics for a few decades and then Liberals decided this was the biggest threat to children and culture wars, would anyone stop and think, what if Peterson has little idea of what he’s talking about?
|
On November 06 2021 23:41 KwarK wrote:Show nested quote +On November 06 2021 17:18 BlackJack wrote:On November 06 2021 10:15 WombaT wrote:On November 06 2021 10:03 BlackJack wrote:On November 06 2021 09:19 WombaT wrote:On November 06 2021 06:31 BlackJack wrote:On November 06 2021 04:52 WombaT wrote:On November 06 2021 03:58 Mohdoo wrote:On November 06 2021 03:18 KwarK wrote: It’s as real as all the other made up persecution fantasies the right circle jerk over on Facebook. There isn’t a national problem of politically motivated persecution of white children in schools to address, just as there isn’t one of Christian persecution or conservative persecution or anything else. I mean for fucks sake, one of the examples of persecution you listed was limited spaces at a high demand school being given out using a lottery system in the name of fairness. So long as wine moms believe CRT is trying to make their kids feel ashamed of slavery, its a done deal. We don't get to choose the electorate, we can just work around it. Shaming white people is not a winning strategy. Just to be clear, my position is that CRT is very good and important and also a really bad idea because if you lose the election none of it matters. What is palatable at this point though? Just put up with ridiculously sensitive sensibilities in perpetuity and don’t attempt to do anything ever? I think yes, if CRT was actually being pushed as is being billed and little Billy is being told he should be ashamed for being white by his teacher, then yes I’m in agreement on messaging 100% ‘So long as x believes’ is a good maxim to go by if there’s some problem in communication that can reasonably be solved by better communication. To a point that is where x’s beliefs aren’t particularly reasonably held even after attempts at clarification. It people wish to object to ‘CRT’ based on what’s actually proposed and implemented, that’s their prerogative but we’re in a position of defending policies that well, basically don’t exist in the first place in the way people conceive, and even when corrected they’ll still double down. I mean not just here, should we not have passed the ACA because people believed there’d be death panels for the elderly, or more contemporaneously should we not roll out a vaccine program with mandates because some people don’t believe in vaccines, or hell Covid existing? There is also the other side of the ledger. Symbolic or structural tackling of racial inequity may get a whole load of blowback, but equally abandoning it will be very unpopular in other quarters. https://www.seattletimes.com/education-lab/new-course-outlines-prompt-conversations-about-identity-race-in-seattle-classrooms-even-in-math/Seattle public schools proposal to implement ethnic studies into their math class In math, lessons are more theoretical. Seattle’s recently released proposal includes questions like, “Where does Power and Oppression show up in our math experiences?” and “How is math manipulated to allow inequality and oppression to persist?” This is the crux of the issue - everything has to be seen through this lens of race, oppressors vs oppressed, privileged vs unprivilged, even in math class. It's what people are objecting to. No it doesn’t, and isn’t. In a U.S. history class, for example, histories of oppression, institutionalized racism, community organizing and resistance can be worked into the lesson plan, said Wayne Au, a professor at the University of Washington, Bothell, who has helped lead Seattle’s ethnic-studies initiative.
In math, lessons are more theoretical. Seattle’s recently released proposal includes questions like, “Where does Power and Oppression show up in our math experiences?” and “How is math manipulated to allow inequality and oppression to persist?”Example 1 yes, because that’s literally history. Example 2 well, no that’s silly, to a degree. Is it even remotely being adopted nationally in a commensurate way to the outrage? No it just isn’t. And to be clear here I’m fully on board with the idea that implementing that within a maths lesson is ridiculous, which it is. It absolutely, that aside doesn’t have to be seen through that lens, people just choose to do so. Attempts to redress problems may touch upon certain areas, the people proposing redress don’t do so through a framework of white people are awful, or merit isn’t important or whatever, for the most part. I’ve never, personally felt under any kind of attack for the ‘crime’ of being a straight cis white male, at all, ever. If other people want to feel that way it’s up to them, I don’t think it’s particularly backed up by anything tangible. It absolutely is part of a larger national trend to promote equity in schools. Perhaps it's not commensurate to the level of outrage, but it is happening. And what is the problem in promoting equity? It folks have issues in this domain go for it, but what are the objections and what are the specifics and why are you annoyed? If your pissed off that CRT is a huge part of the curriculum well, when it literally isn’t a part of the curriculum your point is fucking silly and redundant. The argument seemingly being that we placate these people with positions that on examination are completely out of kilter wiry actual reality. My point is it's not unreasonable to expect your kid to learn math in math class instead of how math is used as a tool to oppress people. Parents are rightly annoyed and they showed it at the polls. Also not sure why you are still calling it CRT when we all agreed that it's not CRT. Is this an example of something the Democrats support or a made up thing?
I'm guessing it's a thing taught by twelve math teachers from across the country, cherry picked out of a quarter million of us.
|
|
|
On November 07 2021 00:12 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:Show nested quote +On November 06 2021 23:41 KwarK wrote:On November 06 2021 17:18 BlackJack wrote:On November 06 2021 10:15 WombaT wrote:On November 06 2021 10:03 BlackJack wrote:On November 06 2021 09:19 WombaT wrote:On November 06 2021 06:31 BlackJack wrote:On November 06 2021 04:52 WombaT wrote:On November 06 2021 03:58 Mohdoo wrote:On November 06 2021 03:18 KwarK wrote: It’s as real as all the other made up persecution fantasies the right circle jerk over on Facebook. There isn’t a national problem of politically motivated persecution of white children in schools to address, just as there isn’t one of Christian persecution or conservative persecution or anything else. I mean for fucks sake, one of the examples of persecution you listed was limited spaces at a high demand school being given out using a lottery system in the name of fairness. So long as wine moms believe CRT is trying to make their kids feel ashamed of slavery, its a done deal. We don't get to choose the electorate, we can just work around it. Shaming white people is not a winning strategy. Just to be clear, my position is that CRT is very good and important and also a really bad idea because if you lose the election none of it matters. What is palatable at this point though? Just put up with ridiculously sensitive sensibilities in perpetuity and don’t attempt to do anything ever? I think yes, if CRT was actually being pushed as is being billed and little Billy is being told he should be ashamed for being white by his teacher, then yes I’m in agreement on messaging 100% ‘So long as x believes’ is a good maxim to go by if there’s some problem in communication that can reasonably be solved by better communication. To a point that is where x’s beliefs aren’t particularly reasonably held even after attempts at clarification. It people wish to object to ‘CRT’ based on what’s actually proposed and implemented, that’s their prerogative but we’re in a position of defending policies that well, basically don’t exist in the first place in the way people conceive, and even when corrected they’ll still double down. I mean not just here, should we not have passed the ACA because people believed there’d be death panels for the elderly, or more contemporaneously should we not roll out a vaccine program with mandates because some people don’t believe in vaccines, or hell Covid existing? There is also the other side of the ledger. Symbolic or structural tackling of racial inequity may get a whole load of blowback, but equally abandoning it will be very unpopular in other quarters. https://www.seattletimes.com/education-lab/new-course-outlines-prompt-conversations-about-identity-race-in-seattle-classrooms-even-in-math/Seattle public schools proposal to implement ethnic studies into their math class In math, lessons are more theoretical. Seattle’s recently released proposal includes questions like, “Where does Power and Oppression show up in our math experiences?” and “How is math manipulated to allow inequality and oppression to persist?” This is the crux of the issue - everything has to be seen through this lens of race, oppressors vs oppressed, privileged vs unprivilged, even in math class. It's what people are objecting to. No it doesn’t, and isn’t. In a U.S. history class, for example, histories of oppression, institutionalized racism, community organizing and resistance can be worked into the lesson plan, said Wayne Au, a professor at the University of Washington, Bothell, who has helped lead Seattle’s ethnic-studies initiative.
In math, lessons are more theoretical. Seattle’s recently released proposal includes questions like, “Where does Power and Oppression show up in our math experiences?” and “How is math manipulated to allow inequality and oppression to persist?”Example 1 yes, because that’s literally history. Example 2 well, no that’s silly, to a degree. Is it even remotely being adopted nationally in a commensurate way to the outrage? No it just isn’t. And to be clear here I’m fully on board with the idea that implementing that within a maths lesson is ridiculous, which it is. It absolutely, that aside doesn’t have to be seen through that lens, people just choose to do so. Attempts to redress problems may touch upon certain areas, the people proposing redress don’t do so through a framework of white people are awful, or merit isn’t important or whatever, for the most part. I’ve never, personally felt under any kind of attack for the ‘crime’ of being a straight cis white male, at all, ever. If other people want to feel that way it’s up to them, I don’t think it’s particularly backed up by anything tangible. It absolutely is part of a larger national trend to promote equity in schools. Perhaps it's not commensurate to the level of outrage, but it is happening. And what is the problem in promoting equity? It folks have issues in this domain go for it, but what are the objections and what are the specifics and why are you annoyed? If your pissed off that CRT is a huge part of the curriculum well, when it literally isn’t a part of the curriculum your point is fucking silly and redundant. The argument seemingly being that we placate these people with positions that on examination are completely out of kilter wiry actual reality. My point is it's not unreasonable to expect your kid to learn math in math class instead of how math is used as a tool to oppress people. Parents are rightly annoyed and they showed it at the polls. Also not sure why you are still calling it CRT when we all agreed that it's not CRT. Is this an example of something the Democrats support or a made up thing? I'm guessing it's a thing taught by twelve math teachers from across the country, cherry picked out of a quarter million of us.
I can't possibly imagine how you concluded that based on the source I provided.
From the article I provided:
Seattle schools are in the process of developing ethnic-studies frameworks for different subjects, including social studies and art.
Other states, including Vermont, Oregon and California, are already creating K-12 materials that prioritize the experiences of communities of color. But while some school districts are only building stand-alone ethnic-studies classes, Seattle is also rethinking existing courses to be taught through an anti-racist lens.
Do you care to explain how you got the impression that this is being done by some rogue math teachers dispersed around the country? The article quite clearly states this is being proposed from the top-down to be a part of the Seattle school curriculum. Not something that teachers decided to take upon themselves.
If you think this is isolated to Washington state let's go down the coast to Oregon
https://katu.com/news/local/debate-emerges-over-racism-and-white-supremacy-in-math-instruction
The Oregon Department of Education (ODE) recently sent a newsletter to math educators in the state. The newsletter contained information about a virtual micro-course in math equity instruction that teachers could sign up for. It was titled "Pathway to Math Equity Micro Course 2.0: Valuing and elevating student discourse in the math classroom." The course was provided by A Pathway to Equitable Math Instruction, an entity focused on dismantling racism in mathematics instruction.
A Pathway to Equitable Math Instruction does offer an 82-page workbook on how teachers can "examine their actions, beliefs, and values around teaching mathematics." The group claims white supremacy culture can show up in the classroom in various ways, including when "the focus is on getting the 'right' answer," and when "students are required to 'show their work.'"
We can go even further down the coast to California where we see California trying to rid its schools of accelerated math programs because there are far too many Asians/Whites in those programs and not enough Hispanics/Blacks
https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2021-05-20/california-controversial-math-overhaul-focuses-on-equity
The new framework aligns with experts who say that efforts to fast-track as many students as possible to advanced math are misguided. And they see their campaign for a more thoughtful, inclusive pacing as a civil rights issue. Too many Latino and Black students and those from low-income families have been left behind as part of a math race in which a small number of students reach calculus.
The commission told writers to remove a document that had become a point of contention for critics. It described its goals as calling out systemic racism in mathematics, while helping educators create more inclusive, successful classrooms.
Same story in New York City where mayor Bill De Blasio has been trying to end merit-based admissions into prestigious schools because it admitted far too many Asians and wasn't representative enough of the general population.
https://thehill.com/opinion/education/521696-de-blasios-obsession-with-racial-balance-in-schools-has-a-clear-victim
De Blasio changed the admissions standards so that a fifth of the seats at New York’s most renowned specialized high schools would be off-limits to students from middle schools such as Christa McAuliffe Intermediate School, which serves a large number of poor, Asian students.
These aren't anecdotes. These are states/cities representing tens of millions of people from all around the country. They're flat out announcing that they are making these changes for the sake of equity / social justice. If you think it's just a coincidence that this is happening all over the country at the same time and not part of a larger national trend as I have said repeatedly then your head is just in the sand.
|
On November 07 2021 00:09 Husyelt wrote: My question is, why does anyone even care about CRT at an academic level? If this was a theory proposed by one dude, and an ideologically motivated one at that, why put it at such a premium? It seems more like a theorycrafting idea. Has it been peer reviewed in any substantial way? Who cares?
If Jordan Peterson in the 90s put forth Critical Post Marxist Theory, and it sat swirling around in various universities and academics for a few decades and then Liberals decided this was the biggest threat to children and culture wars, would anyone stop and think, what if Peterson has little idea of what he’s talking about? It’s just a line in the sand thing. Progressives want white shame so that white people behave better. Conservatives don’t want white shame because their culture dictates shame is hierarchical and works a little differently. Being shamed by people who are seen as either equals or beneath them is a big nono
|
|
On November 07 2021 03:42 BlackJack wrote:Show nested quote +On November 07 2021 00:12 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:On November 06 2021 23:41 KwarK wrote:On November 06 2021 17:18 BlackJack wrote:On November 06 2021 10:15 WombaT wrote:On November 06 2021 10:03 BlackJack wrote:On November 06 2021 09:19 WombaT wrote:On November 06 2021 06:31 BlackJack wrote:On November 06 2021 04:52 WombaT wrote:On November 06 2021 03:58 Mohdoo wrote: [quote]
So long as wine moms believe CRT is trying to make their kids feel ashamed of slavery, its a done deal. We don't get to choose the electorate, we can just work around it. Shaming white people is not a winning strategy.
Just to be clear, my position is that CRT is very good and important and also a really bad idea because if you lose the election none of it matters. What is palatable at this point though? Just put up with ridiculously sensitive sensibilities in perpetuity and don’t attempt to do anything ever? I think yes, if CRT was actually being pushed as is being billed and little Billy is being told he should be ashamed for being white by his teacher, then yes I’m in agreement on messaging 100% ‘So long as x believes’ is a good maxim to go by if there’s some problem in communication that can reasonably be solved by better communication. To a point that is where x’s beliefs aren’t particularly reasonably held even after attempts at clarification. It people wish to object to ‘CRT’ based on what’s actually proposed and implemented, that’s their prerogative but we’re in a position of defending policies that well, basically don’t exist in the first place in the way people conceive, and even when corrected they’ll still double down. I mean not just here, should we not have passed the ACA because people believed there’d be death panels for the elderly, or more contemporaneously should we not roll out a vaccine program with mandates because some people don’t believe in vaccines, or hell Covid existing? There is also the other side of the ledger. Symbolic or structural tackling of racial inequity may get a whole load of blowback, but equally abandoning it will be very unpopular in other quarters. https://www.seattletimes.com/education-lab/new-course-outlines-prompt-conversations-about-identity-race-in-seattle-classrooms-even-in-math/Seattle public schools proposal to implement ethnic studies into their math class In math, lessons are more theoretical. Seattle’s recently released proposal includes questions like, “Where does Power and Oppression show up in our math experiences?” and “How is math manipulated to allow inequality and oppression to persist?” This is the crux of the issue - everything has to be seen through this lens of race, oppressors vs oppressed, privileged vs unprivilged, even in math class. It's what people are objecting to. No it doesn’t, and isn’t. In a U.S. history class, for example, histories of oppression, institutionalized racism, community organizing and resistance can be worked into the lesson plan, said Wayne Au, a professor at the University of Washington, Bothell, who has helped lead Seattle’s ethnic-studies initiative.
In math, lessons are more theoretical. Seattle’s recently released proposal includes questions like, “Where does Power and Oppression show up in our math experiences?” and “How is math manipulated to allow inequality and oppression to persist?”Example 1 yes, because that’s literally history. Example 2 well, no that’s silly, to a degree. Is it even remotely being adopted nationally in a commensurate way to the outrage? No it just isn’t. And to be clear here I’m fully on board with the idea that implementing that within a maths lesson is ridiculous, which it is. It absolutely, that aside doesn’t have to be seen through that lens, people just choose to do so. Attempts to redress problems may touch upon certain areas, the people proposing redress don’t do so through a framework of white people are awful, or merit isn’t important or whatever, for the most part. I’ve never, personally felt under any kind of attack for the ‘crime’ of being a straight cis white male, at all, ever. If other people want to feel that way it’s up to them, I don’t think it’s particularly backed up by anything tangible. It absolutely is part of a larger national trend to promote equity in schools. Perhaps it's not commensurate to the level of outrage, but it is happening. And what is the problem in promoting equity? It folks have issues in this domain go for it, but what are the objections and what are the specifics and why are you annoyed? If your pissed off that CRT is a huge part of the curriculum well, when it literally isn’t a part of the curriculum your point is fucking silly and redundant. The argument seemingly being that we placate these people with positions that on examination are completely out of kilter wiry actual reality. My point is it's not unreasonable to expect your kid to learn math in math class instead of how math is used as a tool to oppress people. Parents are rightly annoyed and they showed it at the polls. Also not sure why you are still calling it CRT when we all agreed that it's not CRT. Is this an example of something the Democrats support or a made up thing? I'm guessing it's a thing taught by twelve math teachers from across the country, cherry picked out of a quarter million of us. I can't possibly imagine how you concluded that based on the source I provided. From the article I provided: Show nested quote +Seattle schools are in the process of developing ethnic-studies frameworks for different subjects, including social studies and art.
Other states, including Vermont, Oregon and California, are already creating K-12 materials that prioritize the experiences of communities of color. But while some school districts are only building stand-alone ethnic-studies classes, Seattle is also rethinking existing courses to be taught through an anti-racist lens. Do you care to explain how you got the impression that this is being done by some rogue math teachers dispersed around the country? The article quite clearly states this is being proposed from the top-down to be a part of the Seattle school curriculum. Not something that teachers decided to take upon themselves. If you think this is isolated to Washington state let's go down the coast to Oregon https://katu.com/news/local/debate-emerges-over-racism-and-white-supremacy-in-math-instructionShow nested quote +The Oregon Department of Education (ODE) recently sent a newsletter to math educators in the state. The newsletter contained information about a virtual micro-course in math equity instruction that teachers could sign up for. It was titled "Pathway to Math Equity Micro Course 2.0: Valuing and elevating student discourse in the math classroom." The course was provided by A Pathway to Equitable Math Instruction, an entity focused on dismantling racism in mathematics instruction.
A Pathway to Equitable Math Instruction does offer an 82-page workbook on how teachers can "examine their actions, beliefs, and values around teaching mathematics." The group claims white supremacy culture can show up in the classroom in various ways, including when "the focus is on getting the 'right' answer," and when "students are required to 'show their work.'" We can go even further down the coast to California where we see California trying to rid its schools of accelerated math programs because there are far too many Asians/Whites in those programs and not enough Hispanics/Blacks https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2021-05-20/california-controversial-math-overhaul-focuses-on-equityShow nested quote +The new framework aligns with experts who say that efforts to fast-track as many students as possible to advanced math are misguided. And they see their campaign for a more thoughtful, inclusive pacing as a civil rights issue. Too many Latino and Black students and those from low-income families have been left behind as part of a math race in which a small number of students reach calculus.
The commission told writers to remove a document that had become a point of contention for critics. It described its goals as calling out systemic racism in mathematics, while helping educators create more inclusive, successful classrooms. Same story in New York City where mayor Bill De Blasio has been trying to end merit-based admissions into prestigious schools because it admitted far too many Asians and wasn't representative enough of the general population. https://thehill.com/opinion/education/521696-de-blasios-obsession-with-racial-balance-in-schools-has-a-clear-victimShow nested quote +De Blasio changed the admissions standards so that a fifth of the seats at New York’s most renowned specialized high schools would be off-limits to students from middle schools such as Christa McAuliffe Intermediate School, which serves a large number of poor, Asian students. These aren't anecdotes. These are states/cities representing tens of millions of people from all around the country. They're flat out announcing that they are making these changes for the sake of equity / social justice. If you think it's just a coincidence that this is happening all over the country at the same time and not part of a larger national trend as I have said repeatedly then your head is just in the sand.
Yes, people are obfuscating when they say "CRT isn't being taught." True enough no one is adding CRT lectures as a class in second period or anything but these, shall we call them "CRT-adjacent" or maybe "CRT-derivative", ideas are being used to make decisions with material impact on students at the state level. Or we can take a local example from a state recently in the news where last year Fairfax county used covid funds to pay Kendi $20000 for a 45 minute presentation. But no, we'll be lectured about people falling for lies by those still clinging to the Russia hoax.
It's like missing the forest for the trees because you're squinting really hard.
|
|
On November 07 2021 07:38 Introvert wrote:Show nested quote +On November 07 2021 03:42 BlackJack wrote:On November 07 2021 00:12 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:On November 06 2021 23:41 KwarK wrote:On November 06 2021 17:18 BlackJack wrote:On November 06 2021 10:15 WombaT wrote:On November 06 2021 10:03 BlackJack wrote:On November 06 2021 09:19 WombaT wrote:On November 06 2021 06:31 BlackJack wrote:On November 06 2021 04:52 WombaT wrote: [quote] What is palatable at this point though? Just put up with ridiculously sensitive sensibilities in perpetuity and don’t attempt to do anything ever?
I think yes, if CRT was actually being pushed as is being billed and little Billy is being told he should be ashamed for being white by his teacher, then yes I’m in agreement on messaging 100%
‘So long as x believes’ is a good maxim to go by if there’s some problem in communication that can reasonably be solved by better communication. To a point that is where x’s beliefs aren’t particularly reasonably held even after attempts at clarification.
It people wish to object to ‘CRT’ based on what’s actually proposed and implemented, that’s their prerogative but we’re in a position of defending policies that well, basically don’t exist in the first place in the way people conceive, and even when corrected they’ll still double down.
I mean not just here, should we not have passed the ACA because people believed there’d be death panels for the elderly, or more contemporaneously should we not roll out a vaccine program with mandates because some people don’t believe in vaccines, or hell Covid existing?
There is also the other side of the ledger. Symbolic or structural tackling of racial inequity may get a whole load of blowback, but equally abandoning it will be very unpopular in other quarters.
https://www.seattletimes.com/education-lab/new-course-outlines-prompt-conversations-about-identity-race-in-seattle-classrooms-even-in-math/Seattle public schools proposal to implement ethnic studies into their math class In math, lessons are more theoretical. Seattle’s recently released proposal includes questions like, “Where does Power and Oppression show up in our math experiences?” and “How is math manipulated to allow inequality and oppression to persist?” This is the crux of the issue - everything has to be seen through this lens of race, oppressors vs oppressed, privileged vs unprivilged, even in math class. It's what people are objecting to. No it doesn’t, and isn’t. In a U.S. history class, for example, histories of oppression, institutionalized racism, community organizing and resistance can be worked into the lesson plan, said Wayne Au, a professor at the University of Washington, Bothell, who has helped lead Seattle’s ethnic-studies initiative.
In math, lessons are more theoretical. Seattle’s recently released proposal includes questions like, “Where does Power and Oppression show up in our math experiences?” and “How is math manipulated to allow inequality and oppression to persist?”Example 1 yes, because that’s literally history. Example 2 well, no that’s silly, to a degree. Is it even remotely being adopted nationally in a commensurate way to the outrage? No it just isn’t. And to be clear here I’m fully on board with the idea that implementing that within a maths lesson is ridiculous, which it is. It absolutely, that aside doesn’t have to be seen through that lens, people just choose to do so. Attempts to redress problems may touch upon certain areas, the people proposing redress don’t do so through a framework of white people are awful, or merit isn’t important or whatever, for the most part. I’ve never, personally felt under any kind of attack for the ‘crime’ of being a straight cis white male, at all, ever. If other people want to feel that way it’s up to them, I don’t think it’s particularly backed up by anything tangible. It absolutely is part of a larger national trend to promote equity in schools. Perhaps it's not commensurate to the level of outrage, but it is happening. And what is the problem in promoting equity? It folks have issues in this domain go for it, but what are the objections and what are the specifics and why are you annoyed? If your pissed off that CRT is a huge part of the curriculum well, when it literally isn’t a part of the curriculum your point is fucking silly and redundant. The argument seemingly being that we placate these people with positions that on examination are completely out of kilter wiry actual reality. My point is it's not unreasonable to expect your kid to learn math in math class instead of how math is used as a tool to oppress people. Parents are rightly annoyed and they showed it at the polls. Also not sure why you are still calling it CRT when we all agreed that it's not CRT. Is this an example of something the Democrats support or a made up thing? I'm guessing it's a thing taught by twelve math teachers from across the country, cherry picked out of a quarter million of us. I can't possibly imagine how you concluded that based on the source I provided. From the article I provided: Seattle schools are in the process of developing ethnic-studies frameworks for different subjects, including social studies and art.
Other states, including Vermont, Oregon and California, are already creating K-12 materials that prioritize the experiences of communities of color. But while some school districts are only building stand-alone ethnic-studies classes, Seattle is also rethinking existing courses to be taught through an anti-racist lens. Do you care to explain how you got the impression that this is being done by some rogue math teachers dispersed around the country? The article quite clearly states this is being proposed from the top-down to be a part of the Seattle school curriculum. Not something that teachers decided to take upon themselves. If you think this is isolated to Washington state let's go down the coast to Oregon https://katu.com/news/local/debate-emerges-over-racism-and-white-supremacy-in-math-instructionThe Oregon Department of Education (ODE) recently sent a newsletter to math educators in the state. The newsletter contained information about a virtual micro-course in math equity instruction that teachers could sign up for. It was titled "Pathway to Math Equity Micro Course 2.0: Valuing and elevating student discourse in the math classroom." The course was provided by A Pathway to Equitable Math Instruction, an entity focused on dismantling racism in mathematics instruction.
A Pathway to Equitable Math Instruction does offer an 82-page workbook on how teachers can "examine their actions, beliefs, and values around teaching mathematics." The group claims white supremacy culture can show up in the classroom in various ways, including when "the focus is on getting the 'right' answer," and when "students are required to 'show their work.'" We can go even further down the coast to California where we see California trying to rid its schools of accelerated math programs because there are far too many Asians/Whites in those programs and not enough Hispanics/Blacks https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2021-05-20/california-controversial-math-overhaul-focuses-on-equityThe new framework aligns with experts who say that efforts to fast-track as many students as possible to advanced math are misguided. And they see their campaign for a more thoughtful, inclusive pacing as a civil rights issue. Too many Latino and Black students and those from low-income families have been left behind as part of a math race in which a small number of students reach calculus.
The commission told writers to remove a document that had become a point of contention for critics. It described its goals as calling out systemic racism in mathematics, while helping educators create more inclusive, successful classrooms. Same story in New York City where mayor Bill De Blasio has been trying to end merit-based admissions into prestigious schools because it admitted far too many Asians and wasn't representative enough of the general population. https://thehill.com/opinion/education/521696-de-blasios-obsession-with-racial-balance-in-schools-has-a-clear-victimDe Blasio changed the admissions standards so that a fifth of the seats at New York’s most renowned specialized high schools would be off-limits to students from middle schools such as Christa McAuliffe Intermediate School, which serves a large number of poor, Asian students. These aren't anecdotes. These are states/cities representing tens of millions of people from all around the country. They're flat out announcing that they are making these changes for the sake of equity / social justice. If you think it's just a coincidence that this is happening all over the country at the same time and not part of a larger national trend as I have said repeatedly then your head is just in the sand. Yes, people are obfuscating when they say "CRT isn't being taught." True enough no one is adding CRT lectures as a class in second period or anything but these, shall we call them "CRT-adjacent" or maybe "CRT-derivative", ideas are being used to make decisions with material impact on students at the state level. Or we can take a local example from a state recently in the news where last year Fairfax county used covid funds to pay Kendi $20000 for a 45 minute presentation. But no, we'll be lectured about people falling for lies by those still clinging to the Russia hoax. It's like missing the forest for the trees because you're squinting really hard.
Ibram X. Kendi is an American author, professor, anti-racist activist, and historian of race and discriminatory policy in America ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ibram_X._Kendi ). He's clearly an expert in his field. What's wrong with him speaking to teachers/administrators about "how racism impacts students’ learning" (from your Fox source)? Hell, I wish he had directly spoken with the students as a school-wide assembly too, but I don't think he did.
|
United States41988 Posts
On November 07 2021 07:38 Introvert wrote:Show nested quote +On November 07 2021 03:42 BlackJack wrote:On November 07 2021 00:12 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:On November 06 2021 23:41 KwarK wrote:On November 06 2021 17:18 BlackJack wrote:On November 06 2021 10:15 WombaT wrote:On November 06 2021 10:03 BlackJack wrote:On November 06 2021 09:19 WombaT wrote:On November 06 2021 06:31 BlackJack wrote:On November 06 2021 04:52 WombaT wrote: [quote] What is palatable at this point though? Just put up with ridiculously sensitive sensibilities in perpetuity and don’t attempt to do anything ever?
I think yes, if CRT was actually being pushed as is being billed and little Billy is being told he should be ashamed for being white by his teacher, then yes I’m in agreement on messaging 100%
‘So long as x believes’ is a good maxim to go by if there’s some problem in communication that can reasonably be solved by better communication. To a point that is where x’s beliefs aren’t particularly reasonably held even after attempts at clarification.
It people wish to object to ‘CRT’ based on what’s actually proposed and implemented, that’s their prerogative but we’re in a position of defending policies that well, basically don’t exist in the first place in the way people conceive, and even when corrected they’ll still double down.
I mean not just here, should we not have passed the ACA because people believed there’d be death panels for the elderly, or more contemporaneously should we not roll out a vaccine program with mandates because some people don’t believe in vaccines, or hell Covid existing?
There is also the other side of the ledger. Symbolic or structural tackling of racial inequity may get a whole load of blowback, but equally abandoning it will be very unpopular in other quarters.
https://www.seattletimes.com/education-lab/new-course-outlines-prompt-conversations-about-identity-race-in-seattle-classrooms-even-in-math/Seattle public schools proposal to implement ethnic studies into their math class In math, lessons are more theoretical. Seattle’s recently released proposal includes questions like, “Where does Power and Oppression show up in our math experiences?” and “How is math manipulated to allow inequality and oppression to persist?” This is the crux of the issue - everything has to be seen through this lens of race, oppressors vs oppressed, privileged vs unprivilged, even in math class. It's what people are objecting to. No it doesn’t, and isn’t. In a U.S. history class, for example, histories of oppression, institutionalized racism, community organizing and resistance can be worked into the lesson plan, said Wayne Au, a professor at the University of Washington, Bothell, who has helped lead Seattle’s ethnic-studies initiative.
In math, lessons are more theoretical. Seattle’s recently released proposal includes questions like, “Where does Power and Oppression show up in our math experiences?” and “How is math manipulated to allow inequality and oppression to persist?”Example 1 yes, because that’s literally history. Example 2 well, no that’s silly, to a degree. Is it even remotely being adopted nationally in a commensurate way to the outrage? No it just isn’t. And to be clear here I’m fully on board with the idea that implementing that within a maths lesson is ridiculous, which it is. It absolutely, that aside doesn’t have to be seen through that lens, people just choose to do so. Attempts to redress problems may touch upon certain areas, the people proposing redress don’t do so through a framework of white people are awful, or merit isn’t important or whatever, for the most part. I’ve never, personally felt under any kind of attack for the ‘crime’ of being a straight cis white male, at all, ever. If other people want to feel that way it’s up to them, I don’t think it’s particularly backed up by anything tangible. It absolutely is part of a larger national trend to promote equity in schools. Perhaps it's not commensurate to the level of outrage, but it is happening. And what is the problem in promoting equity? It folks have issues in this domain go for it, but what are the objections and what are the specifics and why are you annoyed? If your pissed off that CRT is a huge part of the curriculum well, when it literally isn’t a part of the curriculum your point is fucking silly and redundant. The argument seemingly being that we placate these people with positions that on examination are completely out of kilter wiry actual reality. My point is it's not unreasonable to expect your kid to learn math in math class instead of how math is used as a tool to oppress people. Parents are rightly annoyed and they showed it at the polls. Also not sure why you are still calling it CRT when we all agreed that it's not CRT. Is this an example of something the Democrats support or a made up thing? I'm guessing it's a thing taught by twelve math teachers from across the country, cherry picked out of a quarter million of us. I can't possibly imagine how you concluded that based on the source I provided. From the article I provided: Seattle schools are in the process of developing ethnic-studies frameworks for different subjects, including social studies and art.
Other states, including Vermont, Oregon and California, are already creating K-12 materials that prioritize the experiences of communities of color. But while some school districts are only building stand-alone ethnic-studies classes, Seattle is also rethinking existing courses to be taught through an anti-racist lens. Do you care to explain how you got the impression that this is being done by some rogue math teachers dispersed around the country? The article quite clearly states this is being proposed from the top-down to be a part of the Seattle school curriculum. Not something that teachers decided to take upon themselves. If you think this is isolated to Washington state let's go down the coast to Oregon https://katu.com/news/local/debate-emerges-over-racism-and-white-supremacy-in-math-instructionThe Oregon Department of Education (ODE) recently sent a newsletter to math educators in the state. The newsletter contained information about a virtual micro-course in math equity instruction that teachers could sign up for. It was titled "Pathway to Math Equity Micro Course 2.0: Valuing and elevating student discourse in the math classroom." The course was provided by A Pathway to Equitable Math Instruction, an entity focused on dismantling racism in mathematics instruction.
A Pathway to Equitable Math Instruction does offer an 82-page workbook on how teachers can "examine their actions, beliefs, and values around teaching mathematics." The group claims white supremacy culture can show up in the classroom in various ways, including when "the focus is on getting the 'right' answer," and when "students are required to 'show their work.'" We can go even further down the coast to California where we see California trying to rid its schools of accelerated math programs because there are far too many Asians/Whites in those programs and not enough Hispanics/Blacks https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2021-05-20/california-controversial-math-overhaul-focuses-on-equityThe new framework aligns with experts who say that efforts to fast-track as many students as possible to advanced math are misguided. And they see their campaign for a more thoughtful, inclusive pacing as a civil rights issue. Too many Latino and Black students and those from low-income families have been left behind as part of a math race in which a small number of students reach calculus.
The commission told writers to remove a document that had become a point of contention for critics. It described its goals as calling out systemic racism in mathematics, while helping educators create more inclusive, successful classrooms. Same story in New York City where mayor Bill De Blasio has been trying to end merit-based admissions into prestigious schools because it admitted far too many Asians and wasn't representative enough of the general population. https://thehill.com/opinion/education/521696-de-blasios-obsession-with-racial-balance-in-schools-has-a-clear-victimDe Blasio changed the admissions standards so that a fifth of the seats at New York’s most renowned specialized high schools would be off-limits to students from middle schools such as Christa McAuliffe Intermediate School, which serves a large number of poor, Asian students. These aren't anecdotes. These are states/cities representing tens of millions of people from all around the country. They're flat out announcing that they are making these changes for the sake of equity / social justice. If you think it's just a coincidence that this is happening all over the country at the same time and not part of a larger national trend as I have said repeatedly then your head is just in the sand. Yes, people are obfuscating when they say "CRT isn't being taught." True enough no one is adding CRT lectures as a class in second period or anything but these, shall we call them "CRT-adjacent" or maybe "CRT-derivative", ideas are being used to make decisions with material impact on students at the state level. Or we can take a local example from a state recently in the news where last year Fairfax county used covid funds to pay Kendi $20000 for a 45 minute presentation. But no, we'll be lectured about people falling for lies by those still clinging to the Russia hoax. It's like missing the forest for the trees because you're squinting really hard. Just as a reminder, the investigation did conclude Russian state intervention happened. You’re the one still clinging to the Russian hoax hoax, everyone else was vindicated.
|
|
You don't have to be "evil" to try to make sure (fiscally) progressive policy never happens. You just have to be beholden to lobbyists/corporate interests. A lot of non-Americans in this thread, happily living with their universal healthcare and other things that are nice to have in first world countries, judging the discontent of Americans who might have standards above "at least they're not Republican" for literally the only alternative party we can vote for.
|
Northern Ireland23839 Posts
On November 07 2021 07:38 Introvert wrote:Show nested quote +On November 07 2021 03:42 BlackJack wrote:On November 07 2021 00:12 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:On November 06 2021 23:41 KwarK wrote:On November 06 2021 17:18 BlackJack wrote:On November 06 2021 10:15 WombaT wrote:On November 06 2021 10:03 BlackJack wrote:On November 06 2021 09:19 WombaT wrote:On November 06 2021 06:31 BlackJack wrote:On November 06 2021 04:52 WombaT wrote: [quote] What is palatable at this point though? Just put up with ridiculously sensitive sensibilities in perpetuity and don’t attempt to do anything ever?
I think yes, if CRT was actually being pushed as is being billed and little Billy is being told he should be ashamed for being white by his teacher, then yes I’m in agreement on messaging 100%
‘So long as x believes’ is a good maxim to go by if there’s some problem in communication that can reasonably be solved by better communication. To a point that is where x’s beliefs aren’t particularly reasonably held even after attempts at clarification.
It people wish to object to ‘CRT’ based on what’s actually proposed and implemented, that’s their prerogative but we’re in a position of defending policies that well, basically don’t exist in the first place in the way people conceive, and even when corrected they’ll still double down.
I mean not just here, should we not have passed the ACA because people believed there’d be death panels for the elderly, or more contemporaneously should we not roll out a vaccine program with mandates because some people don’t believe in vaccines, or hell Covid existing?
There is also the other side of the ledger. Symbolic or structural tackling of racial inequity may get a whole load of blowback, but equally abandoning it will be very unpopular in other quarters.
https://www.seattletimes.com/education-lab/new-course-outlines-prompt-conversations-about-identity-race-in-seattle-classrooms-even-in-math/Seattle public schools proposal to implement ethnic studies into their math class In math, lessons are more theoretical. Seattle’s recently released proposal includes questions like, “Where does Power and Oppression show up in our math experiences?” and “How is math manipulated to allow inequality and oppression to persist?” This is the crux of the issue - everything has to be seen through this lens of race, oppressors vs oppressed, privileged vs unprivilged, even in math class. It's what people are objecting to. No it doesn’t, and isn’t. In a U.S. history class, for example, histories of oppression, institutionalized racism, community organizing and resistance can be worked into the lesson plan, said Wayne Au, a professor at the University of Washington, Bothell, who has helped lead Seattle’s ethnic-studies initiative.
In math, lessons are more theoretical. Seattle’s recently released proposal includes questions like, “Where does Power and Oppression show up in our math experiences?” and “How is math manipulated to allow inequality and oppression to persist?”Example 1 yes, because that’s literally history. Example 2 well, no that’s silly, to a degree. Is it even remotely being adopted nationally in a commensurate way to the outrage? No it just isn’t. And to be clear here I’m fully on board with the idea that implementing that within a maths lesson is ridiculous, which it is. It absolutely, that aside doesn’t have to be seen through that lens, people just choose to do so. Attempts to redress problems may touch upon certain areas, the people proposing redress don’t do so through a framework of white people are awful, or merit isn’t important or whatever, for the most part. I’ve never, personally felt under any kind of attack for the ‘crime’ of being a straight cis white male, at all, ever. If other people want to feel that way it’s up to them, I don’t think it’s particularly backed up by anything tangible. It absolutely is part of a larger national trend to promote equity in schools. Perhaps it's not commensurate to the level of outrage, but it is happening. And what is the problem in promoting equity? It folks have issues in this domain go for it, but what are the objections and what are the specifics and why are you annoyed? If your pissed off that CRT is a huge part of the curriculum well, when it literally isn’t a part of the curriculum your point is fucking silly and redundant. The argument seemingly being that we placate these people with positions that on examination are completely out of kilter wiry actual reality. My point is it's not unreasonable to expect your kid to learn math in math class instead of how math is used as a tool to oppress people. Parents are rightly annoyed and they showed it at the polls. Also not sure why you are still calling it CRT when we all agreed that it's not CRT. Is this an example of something the Democrats support or a made up thing? I'm guessing it's a thing taught by twelve math teachers from across the country, cherry picked out of a quarter million of us. I can't possibly imagine how you concluded that based on the source I provided. From the article I provided: Seattle schools are in the process of developing ethnic-studies frameworks for different subjects, including social studies and art.
Other states, including Vermont, Oregon and California, are already creating K-12 materials that prioritize the experiences of communities of color. But while some school districts are only building stand-alone ethnic-studies classes, Seattle is also rethinking existing courses to be taught through an anti-racist lens. Do you care to explain how you got the impression that this is being done by some rogue math teachers dispersed around the country? The article quite clearly states this is being proposed from the top-down to be a part of the Seattle school curriculum. Not something that teachers decided to take upon themselves. If you think this is isolated to Washington state let's go down the coast to Oregon https://katu.com/news/local/debate-emerges-over-racism-and-white-supremacy-in-math-instructionThe Oregon Department of Education (ODE) recently sent a newsletter to math educators in the state. The newsletter contained information about a virtual micro-course in math equity instruction that teachers could sign up for. It was titled "Pathway to Math Equity Micro Course 2.0: Valuing and elevating student discourse in the math classroom." The course was provided by A Pathway to Equitable Math Instruction, an entity focused on dismantling racism in mathematics instruction.
A Pathway to Equitable Math Instruction does offer an 82-page workbook on how teachers can "examine their actions, beliefs, and values around teaching mathematics." The group claims white supremacy culture can show up in the classroom in various ways, including when "the focus is on getting the 'right' answer," and when "students are required to 'show their work.'" We can go even further down the coast to California where we see California trying to rid its schools of accelerated math programs because there are far too many Asians/Whites in those programs and not enough Hispanics/Blacks https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2021-05-20/california-controversial-math-overhaul-focuses-on-equityThe new framework aligns with experts who say that efforts to fast-track as many students as possible to advanced math are misguided. And they see their campaign for a more thoughtful, inclusive pacing as a civil rights issue. Too many Latino and Black students and those from low-income families have been left behind as part of a math race in which a small number of students reach calculus.
The commission told writers to remove a document that had become a point of contention for critics. It described its goals as calling out systemic racism in mathematics, while helping educators create more inclusive, successful classrooms. Same story in New York City where mayor Bill De Blasio has been trying to end merit-based admissions into prestigious schools because it admitted far too many Asians and wasn't representative enough of the general population. https://thehill.com/opinion/education/521696-de-blasios-obsession-with-racial-balance-in-schools-has-a-clear-victimDe Blasio changed the admissions standards so that a fifth of the seats at New York’s most renowned specialized high schools would be off-limits to students from middle schools such as Christa McAuliffe Intermediate School, which serves a large number of poor, Asian students. These aren't anecdotes. These are states/cities representing tens of millions of people from all around the country. They're flat out announcing that they are making these changes for the sake of equity / social justice. If you think it's just a coincidence that this is happening all over the country at the same time and not part of a larger national trend as I have said repeatedly then your head is just in the sand. Yes, people are obfuscating when they say "CRT isn't being taught." True enough no one is adding CRT lectures as a class in second period or anything but these, shall we call them "CRT-adjacent" or maybe "CRT-derivative", ideas are being used to make decisions with material impact on students at the state level. Or we can take a local example from a state recently in the news where last year Fairfax county used covid funds to pay Kendi $20000 for a 45 minute presentation. But no, we'll be lectured about people falling for lies by those still clinging to the Russia hoax. It's like missing the forest for the trees because you're squinting really hard. A local example from a state I.e the exact thing people are saying isn’t representative of some wider macro trend.
Extraordinary claims require commensurate evidence, if the country is going crazy and ‘maths is racist’ and this is being instituted nation wide well, provide said evidence.
|
On November 07 2021 05:46 JimmiC wrote:
This is why it is important for you to source, because your sources are saying what the experts (DPB and Drone) on education of our thread and others are telling you. That there are many people mad about what might happen, but that it is not actually happening but instead the opposite is.
So the educators that support these proposals are experts but the educators that are critical of these proposals are just biased and should be dismissed outright. Is there something in particular that makes DPB and Eri experts but the educators that oppose the idea as just biased critics? I think your own bias is showing.
However, Eri didn't even say he agreed with the framwork's author that a heterogenous class with students on different levels is beneficial for everyone. In fact he literally said the opposite:
On November 06 2021 05:52 Liquid`Drone wrote: I will agree that a merit-based distribution of students is usually really convenient for the teacher (so - assuming there are 30 students rather than a much more sensible 15, it's one way to make it more manageable), and from an academic point of view, somewhat beneficial for the better students.
He clearly said that he agreed (with me) that a merit-based distrubtion of students is convenient for the teacher and somewhat beneficial for the better students. So I'm not sure where you get that he is saying the opposite, although I know accurately recollecting what people have said is not your strong suit.
On November 07 2021 05:46 JimmiC wrote: What is especially strange is the only group that may have actually been discriminated against was Asian Americans, and because of that the change was reverted. There is nothing that says that white people in anyway are being discriminated against, that is entirely in your head. You had to steal Asian's issues to even try and make it real, that should tell you something.
White people being discriminated against or persecuted was never a tenet of my argument. That's something you and Kwark made up in your heads. My argument is two-fold and it's basically this:
1) Fixating on race in school is unhealthy, it sows more racial division, and it it's a distraction. 2) Ending merit-based placement for the sake of equity is a stupid idea. Teach students according to their ability regardless of skin color.
"You had to steal Asian's issues to even try and make it real." That's such an incredibly ignorant statement. So we should only care about discrimination that happens to people in our ethnic groups? You should really be ashamed for calling discrimination against Asians an "Asian issue." It's an issue for anyone that has decency.
|
On November 07 2021 11:04 BlackJack wrote:Show nested quote +On November 07 2021 05:46 JimmiC wrote:
This is why it is important for you to source, because your sources are saying what the experts (DPB and Drone) on education of our thread and others are telling you. That there are many people mad about what might happen, but that it is not actually happening but instead the opposite is.
So the educators that support these proposals are experts but the educators that are critical of these proposals are just biased and should be dismissed outright. Is there something in particular that makes DPB and Eri experts but the educators that oppose the idea as just biased critics? I think your own bias is showing.
Hold on, you're completely moving the goalposts here. You first asserted that there were sweeping curriculum changes obsessed with inappropriate social justice, that math classes were being transformed and students were being indoctrinated with nonsense at the expense of actually learning math (e.g., when your article claimed that students might not be able to take calculus anymore, because of these mysterious equity concerns). And then your "evidence" was a bunch of fearmongering and hypotheticals, coupled with teachers being educated about discrimination (which has always been part of our training, even when completing our education degrees, long before becoming employed at any particular district). And now you're changing the focus of your accusation to the assertion that I'm not critical of certain positions or saying that I'm a proponent of math-is-racist curricula? I'm more than happy to discuss a specific math lesson plan if you have an example of one that you find troubling, but we're changing the subject here.
|
|
|
|
|