|
Now that we have a new thread, in order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a complete and thorough read before posting! NOTE: When providing a source, please provide a very brief summary on what it's about and what purpose it adds to the discussion. The supporting statement should clearly explain why the subject is relevant and needs to be discussed. Please follow this rule especially for tweets.
Your supporting statement should always come BEFORE you provide the source.If you have any questions, comments, concern, or feedback regarding the USPMT, then please use this thread: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/website-feedback/510156-us-politics-thread |
On November 23 2019 21:27 GreenHorizons wrote:Show nested quote +On November 23 2019 21:19 Gorsameth wrote:On November 23 2019 20:47 GreenHorizons wrote:On November 23 2019 20:39 Sbrubbles wrote: The bright thing is that he's a criminal, not that he's a criminal? That he's obviously and unabashedly criminal, and also the president of the US. The belief leading up to Trump was that he couldn't get elected or if he did the system would check his brazen criminality. That belief was obviously wrong. Rather than reconcile that, Democrats look at the copious amounts of smoke (the kabuki of Mueller/Ukraine) as evidence there's no reason to worry about the bright hot thing (the systems inability to remove an obviously corrupt president). So instead of 'wasting' time on Trump with the possible payoff of winning the next Presidential election you would want them to waste time on re-writing the constitution and the entire electoral system? No. I think that obvious cynicism is part of why support for impeachment isn't over 60% in the first place (wombat touched on this). I'm sure "lets not care about what the President does no matter how bad or blatant it is because the system has fundamental flaws that are really hard to fix" can't possibly end badly.
Yes a lot of American's don't seem to give a shit about what happens, not much you can do about it. Fortunately they are also unlikely to vote so their opinion (or lack thereof) on something doesn't matter anyway.
Do the polls talking about support for impeachment poll everyone, or 'likely voters'?
|
On November 23 2019 21:45 Gorsameth wrote:Show nested quote +On November 23 2019 21:27 GreenHorizons wrote:On November 23 2019 21:19 Gorsameth wrote:On November 23 2019 20:47 GreenHorizons wrote:On November 23 2019 20:39 Sbrubbles wrote: The bright thing is that he's a criminal, not that he's a criminal? That he's obviously and unabashedly criminal, and also the president of the US. The belief leading up to Trump was that he couldn't get elected or if he did the system would check his brazen criminality. That belief was obviously wrong. Rather than reconcile that, Democrats look at the copious amounts of smoke (the kabuki of Mueller/Ukraine) as evidence there's no reason to worry about the bright hot thing (the systems inability to remove an obviously corrupt president). So instead of 'wasting' time on Trump with the possible payoff of winning the next Presidential election you would want them to waste time on re-writing the constitution and the entire electoral system? No. I think that obvious cynicism is part of why support for impeachment isn't over 60% in the first place (wombat touched on this). I'm sure "lets not care about what the President does no matter how bad or blatant it is because the system has fundamental flaws that are really hard to fix" can't possibly end badly. Literally no one is making that argument? Though you seem to be making the inverse?
Yes a lot of American's don't seem to give a shit about what happens, not much you can do about it. Fortunately they are also unlikely to vote so their opinion (or lack thereof) on something doesn't matter anyway.
Do the polls talking about support for impeachment poll everyone, or 'likely voters'? Lots that can and should have been being done about it instead of the superficial stuff Democrats went after to avoid implicating themselves.
Registered and likely mostly, the lower rated ones sometimes poll adults.
|
Looks like Nunes might be under additional scrutiny, through Parnas flipping after being indicted:
Exclusive: Giuliani associate willing to tell Congress Nunes met with ex-Ukrainian official to get dirt on Biden
A lawyer for an indicted associate of Rudy Giuliani tells CNN that his client is willing to tell Congress about meetings the top Republican on the House Intelligence Committee had in Vienna last year with a former Ukrainian prosecutor to discuss digging up dirt on Joe Biden.
The attorney, Joseph A. Bondy, represents Lev Parnas, the recently indicted Soviet-born American who worked with Giuliani to push claims of Democratic corruption in Ukraine. Bondy said that Parnas was told directly by the former Ukrainian official that he met last year in Vienna with Rep. Devin Nunes.
"Mr. Parnas learned from former Ukrainian Prosecutor General Victor Shokin that Nunes had met with Shokin in Vienna last December," said Bondy.
Shokin was ousted from his position in 2016 after pressure from Western leaders, including then-vice president Biden, over concerns that Shokin was not pursuing corruption cases.
Nunes is one of President Donald Trump's key allies in Congress and has emerged as a staunch defender of the President during the impeachment inquiry, which he has frequently labeled as a "circus." Nunes declined repeated requests for comment.
Bondy tells CNN that his client and Nunes began communicating around the time of the Vienna trip. Parnas says he worked to put Nunes in touch with Ukrainians who could help Nunes dig up dirt on Biden and Democrats in Ukraine, according to Bondy.
That information would likely be of great interest to House Democrats given its overlap with the current impeachment inquiry into President Trump, and could put Nunes in a difficult spot.
Bondy tells CNN his client is willing to comply with a Congressional subpoena for documents and testimony as part of the impeachment inquiry in a manner that would allow him to protect his Fifth Amendment rights against self-incrimination.
Bondy suggested in a tweet on Friday that he was already speaking to House Intel though the committee declined to comment.
Giuliani has told CNN previously about his conversations with Shokin and Parnas, saying that this was part of his legal work for his client, President Trump. Parnas' claims about Nunes' alleged involvement offers a new wrinkle and for the first time suggests the efforts to dig up dirt on the Bidens involved a member of Congress.
Parnas' claims that Nunes met with Shokin, which has not been previously reported, add further context to a Daily Beast report that Parnas helped arrange meetings and calls in Europe for Nunes last year, citing another Parnas' lawyer, Ed McMahon.
Those revelations came to a head on Thursday when Democratic Rep. Eric Swalwell raised the Daily Beast story publicly during the impeachment hearing.
Parnas, who was indicted on federal campaign finance charges last month, worked with Shokin and Giuliani to push a pair of unfounded claims: that Ukrainians interfered in the 2016 election on behalf of Democrats, and that Biden was acting corruptly in Ukraine on behalf of his son Hunter, who sat on the board of Ukrainian gas company Burisma Holdings.
According to Bondy, Parnas claims Nunes worked to push similar allegations of Democratic corruption. "Nunes had told Shokin of the urgent need to launch investigations into Burisma, Joe and Hunter Biden, and any purported Ukrainian interference in the 2016 election," Bondy told CNN.
There is no evidence that the Bidens acted inappropriately. Nor is there evidence to support the conspiracy theory that Ukraine worked with Democrats to interfere in the 2016 election.
Yet these claims have been a key part of the public defense of the President put forth by Nunes and other Republicans during the impeachment hearings this month.
Parnas is currently under house arrest in Florida and has pleaded not guilty to charges of federal campaign finance fraud.
Over the past two weeks, CNN approached Nunes on two occasions and reached out to his communications staff to get comment for this story.
In the Capitol on Nov. 14, as CNN began to ask a question about the trip to Vienna, Nunes interjected and said, "I don't talk to you in this lifetime or the next lifetime."
"At any time," Nunes added. "On any question."
Asked again on Thursday about his travel to Vienna and his interactions with Shokin and Parnas, Nunes gave a similar response.
"To be perfectly clear, I don't acknowledge any questions from you in this lifetime or the next lifetime," Nunes said while leaving the impeachment hearing. "I don't acknowledge any question from you ever."
CNN was unable to reach Shokin for comment.
Congressional travel records show that Nunes and three aides traveled to Europe from November 30 to December 3, 2018. The records do not specify that Nunes and his staff went to Vienna or Austria, and Nunes was not required to disclose the exact details of the trip.
Nunes' entourage included retired colonel Derek Harvey, who had previously worked for Trump on the National Security Council, and now works for Nunes on the House Intelligence Committee. Harvey declined to comment.
Bondy told CNN that Nunes planned the trip to Vienna after Republicans lost control of the House in the mid-term elections on Nov. 6, 2018.
"Mr. Parnas learned through Nunes' investigator, Derek Harvey, that the Congressman had sequenced this trip to occur after the mid-term elections yet before Congress' return to session, so that Nunes would not have to disclose the trip details to his Democrat colleagues in Congress," said Bondy.
At the time of the trip, Nunes was chairman of the Intelligence Committee. In January, Democratic Rep. Adam Schiff took over as chairman of the powerful committee, which is now conducting the impeachment inquiry.
Bondy says that according to his client, following a brief in-person meeting in late 2018, Parnas and Nunes had at least two more phone conversations, and that Nunes instructed Parnas to work with Harvey on the Ukraine matters.
Parnas says that shortly after the Vienna trip, he and Harvey met at the Trump International Hotel in Washington, where they discussed claims about the Bidens as well as allegations of Ukrainian election interference, according to Bondy.
Following this, Bondy says that in a phone conversation Nunes told Parnas that he was conducting his own investigation into the Bidens and asked Parnas for help validating information he'd gathered from conversations with various current and former Ukrainian officials, including Shokin.
Parnas says that Nunes told him he'd been partly working off of information from the journalist John Solomon, who had written a number of articles on the Biden conspiracy theory for the Hill, according to Bondy.
CNN reached out to Harvey on multiple occasions for comment. Reached by phone on Friday morning, Harvey refused to comment and directed CNN to contact the communications director for Nunes. That person, Jack Langer, did not respond to numerous requests for comment from CNN. A spokesman for Schiff declined to comment for this story.
Bondy tells CNN that Parnas is also willing to tell Congress about a series of regular meetings he says he took part in at the Trump International Hotel in Washington that concerned Ukraine. According to Bondy, Parnas became part of what he described as a "team" that met several times a week in a private room at the BLT restaurant on the second floor of the Trump Hotel. In addition to giving the group access to key people in Ukraine who could help their cause, Parnas translated their conversations, Bondy said.
The group, according to Bondy, included Giuliani, Parnas, the journalist Solomon, and the married attorneys Joe diGenova and Victoria Toensing. Parnas said that Harvey would occasionally be present as well, and that it was Parnas' understanding that Harvey was Nunes' proxy, Bondy said.
Solomon confirmed the meetings to CNN but said that calling the group a team was a bit of a mischaracterization. Solomon said that connectivity happened more organically, and that his role was only as a journalist reporting a story. Solomon also said that Di Genova and Toensing, his lawyers, introduced him to Parnas as a facilitator and interpreter in early March. "Parnas was very helpful to me in getting Ukraine officials on the record," Solomon told CNN. "I only gradually realized Lev was working for other people, including Rudy Giuliani."
Solomon insists he was only reporting on a story as it unfolded, "Any suggestion that I was involved in any campaign to pressure Ukraine or the United States government to take any actions is categorically false," Solomon said.
Giuliani did not respond to requests for comment. DiGenova and Toensing declined to comment through a spokesperson.
Solomon no longer works at the Hill. After Solomon's reporting came under intense scrutiny during the impeachment inquiry, the paper announced it is reviewing his work.
In the weeks since his arrest, Parnas has become disenchanted with Trump and Giuliani, according to Bondy as well as other sources who spoke to CNN. Parnas, these sources say, was particularly upset when Trump denied knowing him the day after Parnas and his associate Igor Fruman were arrested in October.
Last week, CNN reported that Parnas had claimed to have had a private meeting with Trump in which the President tasked him with a "secret mission" to uncover dirt on Democrats in Ukraine.
"He believes he has put himself out there for the President and now he's been completely hung out to dry," a person close to Parnas told CNN. Last week, the White House did not respond to repeated requests for comment to a series of questions regarding the meeting and Trump's relationship with Parnas.
On Thursday, Bondy promoted the hashtag #LetLevSpeak on Twitter in response to a number of questions about whether Parnas would testify in front of Congress.
Bondy tweeted directly at Republican California Rep. Kevin McCarthy Thursday night after McCarthy accused Schiff of blocking important witnesses from testifying, saying "I don't agree with your premise, but please, if you mean what you say, call my client, Lev Parnas. #LetLevSpeak." https://www.cnn.com/2019/11/22/politics/nunes-vienna-trip-ukrainian-prosecutor-biden/index.html
If this is further corroborated, it would provide additional evidence that more top advisors and Trump associates were extorting Ukraine to interfere with our 2020 election, and that it had been happening for nearly a year. Apparently, Trump and his buddies had been doing this long before Trump's notorious "quid pro quo" call, which was this past July 25th. The planning and meetings may have actually been occurring since 2018.
|
On November 23 2019 21:55 GreenHorizons wrote:Show nested quote +On November 23 2019 21:45 Gorsameth wrote:On November 23 2019 21:27 GreenHorizons wrote:On November 23 2019 21:19 Gorsameth wrote:On November 23 2019 20:47 GreenHorizons wrote:On November 23 2019 20:39 Sbrubbles wrote: The bright thing is that he's a criminal, not that he's a criminal? That he's obviously and unabashedly criminal, and also the president of the US. The belief leading up to Trump was that he couldn't get elected or if he did the system would check his brazen criminality. That belief was obviously wrong. Rather than reconcile that, Democrats look at the copious amounts of smoke (the kabuki of Mueller/Ukraine) as evidence there's no reason to worry about the bright hot thing (the systems inability to remove an obviously corrupt president). So instead of 'wasting' time on Trump with the possible payoff of winning the next Presidential election you would want them to waste time on re-writing the constitution and the entire electoral system? No. I think that obvious cynicism is part of why support for impeachment isn't over 60% in the first place (wombat touched on this). I'm sure "lets not care about what the President does no matter how bad or blatant it is because the system has fundamental flaws that are really hard to fix" can't possibly end badly. Literally no one is making that argument? Though you seem to be making the inverse? Show nested quote +Yes a lot of American's don't seem to give a shit about what happens, not much you can do about it. Fortunately they are also unlikely to vote so their opinion (or lack thereof) on something doesn't matter anyway.
Do the polls talking about support for impeachment poll everyone, or 'likely voters'? Lots that can and should have been being done about it instead of the superficial stuff Democrats went after to avoid implicating themselves. Registered and likely mostly, the lower rated ones sometimes poll adults. So its fine that the Democrats are going after Trump but it would be nice if they did more. Great. But even if there was political will (which I agree there isn't) to do more. Could they? Most are not as utterly stupid as Trump & Co.
Lets start with the obvious one. Bush and the Iraq war. Sure he lied to the people a bunch and misrepresented military intelligence. But what are you going to throw in him in jail for?
Edit: My point is the system as it exists allows for this to happen. And you'r not going to change the system so its impossible to get all but the most obvious and stupid instances, like Trump.
|
There were almost certainly numerous meetings before the infamous call, just a question of how many and who was involved.
|
Northern Ireland23792 Posts
On November 23 2019 22:20 Gorsameth wrote:Show nested quote +On November 23 2019 21:55 GreenHorizons wrote:On November 23 2019 21:45 Gorsameth wrote:On November 23 2019 21:27 GreenHorizons wrote:On November 23 2019 21:19 Gorsameth wrote:On November 23 2019 20:47 GreenHorizons wrote:On November 23 2019 20:39 Sbrubbles wrote: The bright thing is that he's a criminal, not that he's a criminal? That he's obviously and unabashedly criminal, and also the president of the US. The belief leading up to Trump was that he couldn't get elected or if he did the system would check his brazen criminality. That belief was obviously wrong. Rather than reconcile that, Democrats look at the copious amounts of smoke (the kabuki of Mueller/Ukraine) as evidence there's no reason to worry about the bright hot thing (the systems inability to remove an obviously corrupt president). So instead of 'wasting' time on Trump with the possible payoff of winning the next Presidential election you would want them to waste time on re-writing the constitution and the entire electoral system? No. I think that obvious cynicism is part of why support for impeachment isn't over 60% in the first place (wombat touched on this). I'm sure "lets not care about what the President does no matter how bad or blatant it is because the system has fundamental flaws that are really hard to fix" can't possibly end badly. Literally no one is making that argument? Though you seem to be making the inverse? Yes a lot of American's don't seem to give a shit about what happens, not much you can do about it. Fortunately they are also unlikely to vote so their opinion (or lack thereof) on something doesn't matter anyway.
Do the polls talking about support for impeachment poll everyone, or 'likely voters'? Lots that can and should have been being done about it instead of the superficial stuff Democrats went after to avoid implicating themselves. Registered and likely mostly, the lower rated ones sometimes poll adults. So its fine that the Democrats are going after Trump but it would be nice if they did more. Great. But even if there was political will (which I agree there isn't) to do more. Could they? Most are not as utterly stupid as Trump & Co. Lets start with the obvious one. Bush and the Iraq war. Sure he lied to the people a bunch and misrepresented military intelligence. But what are you going to throw in him in jail for?Edit: My point is the system as it exists allows for this to happen. And you'r not going to change the system so its impossible to get all but the most obvious and stupid instances, like Trump. That?
|
On November 23 2019 22:20 Gorsameth wrote:Show nested quote +On November 23 2019 21:55 GreenHorizons wrote:On November 23 2019 21:45 Gorsameth wrote:On November 23 2019 21:27 GreenHorizons wrote:On November 23 2019 21:19 Gorsameth wrote:On November 23 2019 20:47 GreenHorizons wrote:On November 23 2019 20:39 Sbrubbles wrote: The bright thing is that he's a criminal, not that he's a criminal? That he's obviously and unabashedly criminal, and also the president of the US. The belief leading up to Trump was that he couldn't get elected or if he did the system would check his brazen criminality. That belief was obviously wrong. Rather than reconcile that, Democrats look at the copious amounts of smoke (the kabuki of Mueller/Ukraine) as evidence there's no reason to worry about the bright hot thing (the systems inability to remove an obviously corrupt president). So instead of 'wasting' time on Trump with the possible payoff of winning the next Presidential election you would want them to waste time on re-writing the constitution and the entire electoral system? No. I think that obvious cynicism is part of why support for impeachment isn't over 60% in the first place (wombat touched on this). I'm sure "lets not care about what the President does no matter how bad or blatant it is because the system has fundamental flaws that are really hard to fix" can't possibly end badly. Literally no one is making that argument? Though you seem to be making the inverse? Yes a lot of American's don't seem to give a shit about what happens, not much you can do about it. Fortunately they are also unlikely to vote so their opinion (or lack thereof) on something doesn't matter anyway.
Do the polls talking about support for impeachment poll everyone, or 'likely voters'? Lots that can and should have been being done about it instead of the superficial stuff Democrats went after to avoid implicating themselves. Registered and likely mostly, the lower rated ones sometimes poll adults. So its fine that the Democrats are going after Trump but it would be nice if they did more. Great. But even if there was political will (which I agree there isn't) to do more. Could they? Most are not as utterly stupid as Trump & Co. Lets start with the obvious one. Bush and the Iraq war. Sure he lied to the people a bunch and misrepresented military intelligence. But what are you going to throw in him in jail for? Edit: My point is the system as it exists allows for this to happen. And you'r not going to change the system so its impossible to get all but the most obvious and stupid instances, like Trump.
My point is that's the white hot issue that everyone prefers to pretend matters less than Trump being bad, and use the kabuki as evidence they shouldn't be laser focused on it. People know that as soon as Trump is gone, we go right back to ignoring that the system can only (almost) hold the most obvious and stupid corruption accountable and will probably fail at even that.
On November 23 2019 22:32 Wombat_NI wrote:Show nested quote +On November 23 2019 22:20 Gorsameth wrote:On November 23 2019 21:55 GreenHorizons wrote:On November 23 2019 21:45 Gorsameth wrote:On November 23 2019 21:27 GreenHorizons wrote:On November 23 2019 21:19 Gorsameth wrote:On November 23 2019 20:47 GreenHorizons wrote:On November 23 2019 20:39 Sbrubbles wrote: The bright thing is that he's a criminal, not that he's a criminal? That he's obviously and unabashedly criminal, and also the president of the US. The belief leading up to Trump was that he couldn't get elected or if he did the system would check his brazen criminality. That belief was obviously wrong. Rather than reconcile that, Democrats look at the copious amounts of smoke (the kabuki of Mueller/Ukraine) as evidence there's no reason to worry about the bright hot thing (the systems inability to remove an obviously corrupt president). So instead of 'wasting' time on Trump with the possible payoff of winning the next Presidential election you would want them to waste time on re-writing the constitution and the entire electoral system? No. I think that obvious cynicism is part of why support for impeachment isn't over 60% in the first place (wombat touched on this). I'm sure "lets not care about what the President does no matter how bad or blatant it is because the system has fundamental flaws that are really hard to fix" can't possibly end badly. Literally no one is making that argument? Though you seem to be making the inverse? Yes a lot of American's don't seem to give a shit about what happens, not much you can do about it. Fortunately they are also unlikely to vote so their opinion (or lack thereof) on something doesn't matter anyway.
Do the polls talking about support for impeachment poll everyone, or 'likely voters'? Lots that can and should have been being done about it instead of the superficial stuff Democrats went after to avoid implicating themselves. Registered and likely mostly, the lower rated ones sometimes poll adults. So its fine that the Democrats are going after Trump but it would be nice if they did more. Great. But even if there was political will (which I agree there isn't) to do more. Could they? Most are not as utterly stupid as Trump & Co. Lets start with the obvious one. Bush and the Iraq war. Sure he lied to the people a bunch and misrepresented military intelligence. But what are you going to throw in him in jail for?Edit: My point is the system as it exists allows for this to happen. And you'r not going to change the system so its impossible to get all but the most obvious and stupid instances, like Trump. That?
"What are you going to do, just go around jailing war criminals?"
I mean that's the idea behind having war crimes...
|
On November 23 2019 22:32 Wombat_NI wrote:Show nested quote +On November 23 2019 22:20 Gorsameth wrote:On November 23 2019 21:55 GreenHorizons wrote:On November 23 2019 21:45 Gorsameth wrote:On November 23 2019 21:27 GreenHorizons wrote:On November 23 2019 21:19 Gorsameth wrote:On November 23 2019 20:47 GreenHorizons wrote:On November 23 2019 20:39 Sbrubbles wrote: The bright thing is that he's a criminal, not that he's a criminal? That he's obviously and unabashedly criminal, and also the president of the US. The belief leading up to Trump was that he couldn't get elected or if he did the system would check his brazen criminality. That belief was obviously wrong. Rather than reconcile that, Democrats look at the copious amounts of smoke (the kabuki of Mueller/Ukraine) as evidence there's no reason to worry about the bright hot thing (the systems inability to remove an obviously corrupt president). So instead of 'wasting' time on Trump with the possible payoff of winning the next Presidential election you would want them to waste time on re-writing the constitution and the entire electoral system? No. I think that obvious cynicism is part of why support for impeachment isn't over 60% in the first place (wombat touched on this). I'm sure "lets not care about what the President does no matter how bad or blatant it is because the system has fundamental flaws that are really hard to fix" can't possibly end badly. Literally no one is making that argument? Though you seem to be making the inverse? Yes a lot of American's don't seem to give a shit about what happens, not much you can do about it. Fortunately they are also unlikely to vote so their opinion (or lack thereof) on something doesn't matter anyway.
Do the polls talking about support for impeachment poll everyone, or 'likely voters'? Lots that can and should have been being done about it instead of the superficial stuff Democrats went after to avoid implicating themselves. Registered and likely mostly, the lower rated ones sometimes poll adults. So its fine that the Democrats are going after Trump but it would be nice if they did more. Great. But even if there was political will (which I agree there isn't) to do more. Could they? Most are not as utterly stupid as Trump & Co. Lets start with the obvious one. Bush and the Iraq war. Sure he lied to the people a bunch and misrepresented military intelligence. But what are you going to throw in him in jail for?Edit: My point is the system as it exists allows for this to happen. And you'r not going to change the system so its impossible to get all but the most obvious and stupid instances, like Trump. That? Is it a crime?
|
On November 23 2019 22:41 Gorsameth wrote:Show nested quote +On November 23 2019 22:32 Wombat_NI wrote:On November 23 2019 22:20 Gorsameth wrote:On November 23 2019 21:55 GreenHorizons wrote:On November 23 2019 21:45 Gorsameth wrote:On November 23 2019 21:27 GreenHorizons wrote:On November 23 2019 21:19 Gorsameth wrote:On November 23 2019 20:47 GreenHorizons wrote:On November 23 2019 20:39 Sbrubbles wrote: The bright thing is that he's a criminal, not that he's a criminal? That he's obviously and unabashedly criminal, and also the president of the US. The belief leading up to Trump was that he couldn't get elected or if he did the system would check his brazen criminality. That belief was obviously wrong. Rather than reconcile that, Democrats look at the copious amounts of smoke (the kabuki of Mueller/Ukraine) as evidence there's no reason to worry about the bright hot thing (the systems inability to remove an obviously corrupt president). So instead of 'wasting' time on Trump with the possible payoff of winning the next Presidential election you would want them to waste time on re-writing the constitution and the entire electoral system? No. I think that obvious cynicism is part of why support for impeachment isn't over 60% in the first place (wombat touched on this). I'm sure "lets not care about what the President does no matter how bad or blatant it is because the system has fundamental flaws that are really hard to fix" can't possibly end badly. Literally no one is making that argument? Though you seem to be making the inverse? Yes a lot of American's don't seem to give a shit about what happens, not much you can do about it. Fortunately they are also unlikely to vote so their opinion (or lack thereof) on something doesn't matter anyway.
Do the polls talking about support for impeachment poll everyone, or 'likely voters'? Lots that can and should have been being done about it instead of the superficial stuff Democrats went after to avoid implicating themselves. Registered and likely mostly, the lower rated ones sometimes poll adults. So its fine that the Democrats are going after Trump but it would be nice if they did more. Great. But even if there was political will (which I agree there isn't) to do more. Could they? Most are not as utterly stupid as Trump & Co. Lets start with the obvious one. Bush and the Iraq war. Sure he lied to the people a bunch and misrepresented military intelligence. But what are you going to throw in him in jail for?Edit: My point is the system as it exists allows for this to happen. And you'r not going to change the system so its impossible to get all but the most obvious and stupid instances, like Trump. That? Is it a crime?
This is that dangerous reliance on process to reach justice I talk about, maybe not, but the torturing people definitely is/was anyway.
Not holding his administration accountable doesn't just put him joking with Ellen and Spicer dancing with the stars, it results the exact people supervising those war crimes getting promoted.
|
On November 23 2019 22:35 GreenHorizons wrote:Show nested quote +On November 23 2019 22:20 Gorsameth wrote:On November 23 2019 21:55 GreenHorizons wrote:On November 23 2019 21:45 Gorsameth wrote:On November 23 2019 21:27 GreenHorizons wrote:On November 23 2019 21:19 Gorsameth wrote:On November 23 2019 20:47 GreenHorizons wrote:On November 23 2019 20:39 Sbrubbles wrote: The bright thing is that he's a criminal, not that he's a criminal? That he's obviously and unabashedly criminal, and also the president of the US. The belief leading up to Trump was that he couldn't get elected or if he did the system would check his brazen criminality. That belief was obviously wrong. Rather than reconcile that, Democrats look at the copious amounts of smoke (the kabuki of Mueller/Ukraine) as evidence there's no reason to worry about the bright hot thing (the systems inability to remove an obviously corrupt president). So instead of 'wasting' time on Trump with the possible payoff of winning the next Presidential election you would want them to waste time on re-writing the constitution and the entire electoral system? No. I think that obvious cynicism is part of why support for impeachment isn't over 60% in the first place (wombat touched on this). I'm sure "lets not care about what the President does no matter how bad or blatant it is because the system has fundamental flaws that are really hard to fix" can't possibly end badly. Literally no one is making that argument? Though you seem to be making the inverse? Yes a lot of American's don't seem to give a shit about what happens, not much you can do about it. Fortunately they are also unlikely to vote so their opinion (or lack thereof) on something doesn't matter anyway.
Do the polls talking about support for impeachment poll everyone, or 'likely voters'? Lots that can and should have been being done about it instead of the superficial stuff Democrats went after to avoid implicating themselves. Registered and likely mostly, the lower rated ones sometimes poll adults. So its fine that the Democrats are going after Trump but it would be nice if they did more. Great. But even if there was political will (which I agree there isn't) to do more. Could they? Most are not as utterly stupid as Trump & Co. Lets start with the obvious one. Bush and the Iraq war. Sure he lied to the people a bunch and misrepresented military intelligence. But what are you going to throw in him in jail for? Edit: My point is the system as it exists allows for this to happen. And you'r not going to change the system so its impossible to get all but the most obvious and stupid instances, like Trump. My point is that's the white hot issue that everyone prefers to pretend matters less than Trump being bad, and use the kabuki as evidence they shouldn't be laser focused on it. People know that as soon as Trump is gone, we go right back to ignoring that the system can only (almost) hold the most obvious and stupid corruption accountable and will probably fail at even that. Neither party benefits from removing the 2 party system and the people don't give a shit to make it happen. So yes everything is going back to ignore the problems with the system because their is in interest in changing it. Yeah that sucks if your one of the people that does care. Welcome to life.
|
On November 23 2019 22:44 Gorsameth wrote:Show nested quote +On November 23 2019 22:35 GreenHorizons wrote:On November 23 2019 22:20 Gorsameth wrote:On November 23 2019 21:55 GreenHorizons wrote:On November 23 2019 21:45 Gorsameth wrote:On November 23 2019 21:27 GreenHorizons wrote:On November 23 2019 21:19 Gorsameth wrote:On November 23 2019 20:47 GreenHorizons wrote:On November 23 2019 20:39 Sbrubbles wrote: The bright thing is that he's a criminal, not that he's a criminal? That he's obviously and unabashedly criminal, and also the president of the US. The belief leading up to Trump was that he couldn't get elected or if he did the system would check his brazen criminality. That belief was obviously wrong. Rather than reconcile that, Democrats look at the copious amounts of smoke (the kabuki of Mueller/Ukraine) as evidence there's no reason to worry about the bright hot thing (the systems inability to remove an obviously corrupt president). So instead of 'wasting' time on Trump with the possible payoff of winning the next Presidential election you would want them to waste time on re-writing the constitution and the entire electoral system? No. I think that obvious cynicism is part of why support for impeachment isn't over 60% in the first place (wombat touched on this). I'm sure "lets not care about what the President does no matter how bad or blatant it is because the system has fundamental flaws that are really hard to fix" can't possibly end badly. Literally no one is making that argument? Though you seem to be making the inverse? Yes a lot of American's don't seem to give a shit about what happens, not much you can do about it. Fortunately they are also unlikely to vote so their opinion (or lack thereof) on something doesn't matter anyway.
Do the polls talking about support for impeachment poll everyone, or 'likely voters'? Lots that can and should have been being done about it instead of the superficial stuff Democrats went after to avoid implicating themselves. Registered and likely mostly, the lower rated ones sometimes poll adults. So its fine that the Democrats are going after Trump but it would be nice if they did more. Great. But even if there was political will (which I agree there isn't) to do more. Could they? Most are not as utterly stupid as Trump & Co. Lets start with the obvious one. Bush and the Iraq war. Sure he lied to the people a bunch and misrepresented military intelligence. But what are you going to throw in him in jail for? Edit: My point is the system as it exists allows for this to happen. And you'r not going to change the system so its impossible to get all but the most obvious and stupid instances, like Trump. My point is that's the white hot issue that everyone prefers to pretend matters less than Trump being bad, and use the kabuki as evidence they shouldn't be laser focused on it. People know that as soon as Trump is gone, we go right back to ignoring that the system can only (almost) hold the most obvious and stupid corruption accountable and will probably fail at even that. Neither party benefits from removing the 2 party system and the people don't give a shit to make it happen. So yes everything is going back to ignore the problems with the system because their is in interest in changing it. Yeah that sucks if your one of the people that does care. Welcome to life.
Life is what we make it and arguments like yours are self-fulfilling. What you're describing is an acceptance of a neofascist capitalist oligarchy, likely because you've found a relatively comfortable position in it for the moment. I'm sure that won't end poorly... I think there's a popular poem about this?
|
On November 23 2019 22:43 GreenHorizons wrote:Show nested quote +On November 23 2019 22:41 Gorsameth wrote:On November 23 2019 22:32 Wombat_NI wrote:On November 23 2019 22:20 Gorsameth wrote:On November 23 2019 21:55 GreenHorizons wrote:On November 23 2019 21:45 Gorsameth wrote:On November 23 2019 21:27 GreenHorizons wrote:On November 23 2019 21:19 Gorsameth wrote:On November 23 2019 20:47 GreenHorizons wrote:On November 23 2019 20:39 Sbrubbles wrote: The bright thing is that he's a criminal, not that he's a criminal? That he's obviously and unabashedly criminal, and also the president of the US. The belief leading up to Trump was that he couldn't get elected or if he did the system would check his brazen criminality. That belief was obviously wrong. Rather than reconcile that, Democrats look at the copious amounts of smoke (the kabuki of Mueller/Ukraine) as evidence there's no reason to worry about the bright hot thing (the systems inability to remove an obviously corrupt president). So instead of 'wasting' time on Trump with the possible payoff of winning the next Presidential election you would want them to waste time on re-writing the constitution and the entire electoral system? No. I think that obvious cynicism is part of why support for impeachment isn't over 60% in the first place (wombat touched on this). I'm sure "lets not care about what the President does no matter how bad or blatant it is because the system has fundamental flaws that are really hard to fix" can't possibly end badly. Literally no one is making that argument? Though you seem to be making the inverse? Yes a lot of American's don't seem to give a shit about what happens, not much you can do about it. Fortunately they are also unlikely to vote so their opinion (or lack thereof) on something doesn't matter anyway.
Do the polls talking about support for impeachment poll everyone, or 'likely voters'? Lots that can and should have been being done about it instead of the superficial stuff Democrats went after to avoid implicating themselves. Registered and likely mostly, the lower rated ones sometimes poll adults. So its fine that the Democrats are going after Trump but it would be nice if they did more. Great. But even if there was political will (which I agree there isn't) to do more. Could they? Most are not as utterly stupid as Trump & Co. Lets start with the obvious one. Bush and the Iraq war. Sure he lied to the people a bunch and misrepresented military intelligence. But what are you going to throw in him in jail for?Edit: My point is the system as it exists allows for this to happen. And you'r not going to change the system so its impossible to get all but the most obvious and stupid instances, like Trump. That? Is it a crime? This is that dangerous reliance on process to reach justice I talk about, maybe not, but the torturing people definitely is/was anyway. Not holding his administration accountable doesn't just put him joking with Ellen and Spicer dancing with the stars, it results the exact people supervising those war crimes getting promoted. If only there was an international tribunal that could judge over these things and try to hold leaders accountable.
Pity America didn't sign up to it and the President is actually authorised to invade the Netherlands to 'liberate' any US personal held for trial.
Americans seemed to have let that one slide, guess the people don't really care.
|
On November 23 2019 22:48 GreenHorizons wrote:Show nested quote +On November 23 2019 22:44 Gorsameth wrote:On November 23 2019 22:35 GreenHorizons wrote:On November 23 2019 22:20 Gorsameth wrote:On November 23 2019 21:55 GreenHorizons wrote:On November 23 2019 21:45 Gorsameth wrote:On November 23 2019 21:27 GreenHorizons wrote:On November 23 2019 21:19 Gorsameth wrote:On November 23 2019 20:47 GreenHorizons wrote:On November 23 2019 20:39 Sbrubbles wrote: The bright thing is that he's a criminal, not that he's a criminal? That he's obviously and unabashedly criminal, and also the president of the US. The belief leading up to Trump was that he couldn't get elected or if he did the system would check his brazen criminality. That belief was obviously wrong. Rather than reconcile that, Democrats look at the copious amounts of smoke (the kabuki of Mueller/Ukraine) as evidence there's no reason to worry about the bright hot thing (the systems inability to remove an obviously corrupt president). So instead of 'wasting' time on Trump with the possible payoff of winning the next Presidential election you would want them to waste time on re-writing the constitution and the entire electoral system? No. I think that obvious cynicism is part of why support for impeachment isn't over 60% in the first place (wombat touched on this). I'm sure "lets not care about what the President does no matter how bad or blatant it is because the system has fundamental flaws that are really hard to fix" can't possibly end badly. Literally no one is making that argument? Though you seem to be making the inverse? Yes a lot of American's don't seem to give a shit about what happens, not much you can do about it. Fortunately they are also unlikely to vote so their opinion (or lack thereof) on something doesn't matter anyway.
Do the polls talking about support for impeachment poll everyone, or 'likely voters'? Lots that can and should have been being done about it instead of the superficial stuff Democrats went after to avoid implicating themselves. Registered and likely mostly, the lower rated ones sometimes poll adults. So its fine that the Democrats are going after Trump but it would be nice if they did more. Great. But even if there was political will (which I agree there isn't) to do more. Could they? Most are not as utterly stupid as Trump & Co. Lets start with the obvious one. Bush and the Iraq war. Sure he lied to the people a bunch and misrepresented military intelligence. But what are you going to throw in him in jail for? Edit: My point is the system as it exists allows for this to happen. And you'r not going to change the system so its impossible to get all but the most obvious and stupid instances, like Trump. My point is that's the white hot issue that everyone prefers to pretend matters less than Trump being bad, and use the kabuki as evidence they shouldn't be laser focused on it. People know that as soon as Trump is gone, we go right back to ignoring that the system can only (almost) hold the most obvious and stupid corruption accountable and will probably fail at even that. Neither party benefits from removing the 2 party system and the people don't give a shit to make it happen. So yes everything is going back to ignore the problems with the system because their is in interest in changing it. Yeah that sucks if your one of the people that does care. Welcome to life. Life is what we make it and arguments like yours are self-fulfilling. What you're describing is an acceptance of a neofascist capitalist oligarchy, likely because you've found a relatively comfortable position in it for the moment. I'm sure that won't end poorly... I think there's a popular poem about this? So go and do something about it and convince people to change the system. But shouting here about it constantly does nothing because as far as I know pretty much everyone here already agrees that the system isn't good and that it should be changed.
|
On November 23 2019 22:54 Gorsameth wrote:Show nested quote +On November 23 2019 22:43 GreenHorizons wrote:On November 23 2019 22:41 Gorsameth wrote:On November 23 2019 22:32 Wombat_NI wrote:On November 23 2019 22:20 Gorsameth wrote:On November 23 2019 21:55 GreenHorizons wrote:On November 23 2019 21:45 Gorsameth wrote:On November 23 2019 21:27 GreenHorizons wrote:On November 23 2019 21:19 Gorsameth wrote:On November 23 2019 20:47 GreenHorizons wrote: [quote]
That he's obviously and unabashedly criminal, and also the president of the US. The belief leading up to Trump was that he couldn't get elected or if he did the system would check his brazen criminality.
That belief was obviously wrong. Rather than reconcile that, Democrats look at the copious amounts of smoke (the kabuki of Mueller/Ukraine) as evidence there's no reason to worry about the bright hot thing (the systems inability to remove an obviously corrupt president). So instead of 'wasting' time on Trump with the possible payoff of winning the next Presidential election you would want them to waste time on re-writing the constitution and the entire electoral system? No. I think that obvious cynicism is part of why support for impeachment isn't over 60% in the first place (wombat touched on this). I'm sure "lets not care about what the President does no matter how bad or blatant it is because the system has fundamental flaws that are really hard to fix" can't possibly end badly. Literally no one is making that argument? Though you seem to be making the inverse? Yes a lot of American's don't seem to give a shit about what happens, not much you can do about it. Fortunately they are also unlikely to vote so their opinion (or lack thereof) on something doesn't matter anyway.
Do the polls talking about support for impeachment poll everyone, or 'likely voters'? Lots that can and should have been being done about it instead of the superficial stuff Democrats went after to avoid implicating themselves. Registered and likely mostly, the lower rated ones sometimes poll adults. So its fine that the Democrats are going after Trump but it would be nice if they did more. Great. But even if there was political will (which I agree there isn't) to do more. Could they? Most are not as utterly stupid as Trump & Co. Lets start with the obvious one. Bush and the Iraq war. Sure he lied to the people a bunch and misrepresented military intelligence. But what are you going to throw in him in jail for?Edit: My point is the system as it exists allows for this to happen. And you'r not going to change the system so its impossible to get all but the most obvious and stupid instances, like Trump. That? Is it a crime? This is that dangerous reliance on process to reach justice I talk about, maybe not, but the torturing people definitely is/was anyway. Not holding his administration accountable doesn't just put him joking with Ellen and Spicer dancing with the stars, it results the exact people supervising those war crimes getting promoted. If only there was an international tribunal that could judge over these things and try to hold leaders accountable. Pity America didn't sign up to it and the President is actually authorised to invade the Netherlands to 'liberate' any US personal held for trial. Americans seemed to have let that one slide, guess the people don't really care.
Correct me if I'm wrong but your argument is the situation is hopeless, people don't care, so they shouldn't care and instead sustain themselves on faux accountability propaganda?
To what end?
On November 23 2019 22:55 Gorsameth wrote:Show nested quote +On November 23 2019 22:48 GreenHorizons wrote:On November 23 2019 22:44 Gorsameth wrote:On November 23 2019 22:35 GreenHorizons wrote:On November 23 2019 22:20 Gorsameth wrote:On November 23 2019 21:55 GreenHorizons wrote:On November 23 2019 21:45 Gorsameth wrote:On November 23 2019 21:27 GreenHorizons wrote:On November 23 2019 21:19 Gorsameth wrote:On November 23 2019 20:47 GreenHorizons wrote: [quote]
That he's obviously and unabashedly criminal, and also the president of the US. The belief leading up to Trump was that he couldn't get elected or if he did the system would check his brazen criminality.
That belief was obviously wrong. Rather than reconcile that, Democrats look at the copious amounts of smoke (the kabuki of Mueller/Ukraine) as evidence there's no reason to worry about the bright hot thing (the systems inability to remove an obviously corrupt president). So instead of 'wasting' time on Trump with the possible payoff of winning the next Presidential election you would want them to waste time on re-writing the constitution and the entire electoral system? No. I think that obvious cynicism is part of why support for impeachment isn't over 60% in the first place (wombat touched on this). I'm sure "lets not care about what the President does no matter how bad or blatant it is because the system has fundamental flaws that are really hard to fix" can't possibly end badly. Literally no one is making that argument? Though you seem to be making the inverse? Yes a lot of American's don't seem to give a shit about what happens, not much you can do about it. Fortunately they are also unlikely to vote so their opinion (or lack thereof) on something doesn't matter anyway.
Do the polls talking about support for impeachment poll everyone, or 'likely voters'? Lots that can and should have been being done about it instead of the superficial stuff Democrats went after to avoid implicating themselves. Registered and likely mostly, the lower rated ones sometimes poll adults. So its fine that the Democrats are going after Trump but it would be nice if they did more. Great. But even if there was political will (which I agree there isn't) to do more. Could they? Most are not as utterly stupid as Trump & Co. Lets start with the obvious one. Bush and the Iraq war. Sure he lied to the people a bunch and misrepresented military intelligence. But what are you going to throw in him in jail for? Edit: My point is the system as it exists allows for this to happen. And you'r not going to change the system so its impossible to get all but the most obvious and stupid instances, like Trump. My point is that's the white hot issue that everyone prefers to pretend matters less than Trump being bad, and use the kabuki as evidence they shouldn't be laser focused on it. People know that as soon as Trump is gone, we go right back to ignoring that the system can only (almost) hold the most obvious and stupid corruption accountable and will probably fail at even that. Neither party benefits from removing the 2 party system and the people don't give a shit to make it happen. So yes everything is going back to ignore the problems with the system because their is in interest in changing it. Yeah that sucks if your one of the people that does care. Welcome to life. Life is what we make it and arguments like yours are self-fulfilling. What you're describing is an acceptance of a neofascist capitalist oligarchy, likely because you've found a relatively comfortable position in it for the moment. I'm sure that won't end poorly... I think there's a popular poem about this? So go and do something about it and convince people to change the system. But shouting here about it constantly does nothing because as far as I know pretty much everyone here already agrees that the system isn't good and that it should be changed.
So go do something about it. Arguing with me does nothing but maintain the system you allegedly lament. It boils down to the point Kwark made about not liking the existence of whiteclub, but not enough to get rid of it, while also not wanting to feel guilty about that.
|
On November 23 2019 23:01 GreenHorizons wrote:Show nested quote +On November 23 2019 22:54 Gorsameth wrote:On November 23 2019 22:43 GreenHorizons wrote:On November 23 2019 22:41 Gorsameth wrote:On November 23 2019 22:32 Wombat_NI wrote:On November 23 2019 22:20 Gorsameth wrote:On November 23 2019 21:55 GreenHorizons wrote:On November 23 2019 21:45 Gorsameth wrote:On November 23 2019 21:27 GreenHorizons wrote:On November 23 2019 21:19 Gorsameth wrote: [quote]So instead of 'wasting' time on Trump with the possible payoff of winning the next Presidential election you would want them to waste time on re-writing the constitution and the entire electoral system?
No. I think that obvious cynicism is part of why support for impeachment isn't over 60% in the first place (wombat touched on this). I'm sure "lets not care about what the President does no matter how bad or blatant it is because the system has fundamental flaws that are really hard to fix" can't possibly end badly. Literally no one is making that argument? Though you seem to be making the inverse? Yes a lot of American's don't seem to give a shit about what happens, not much you can do about it. Fortunately they are also unlikely to vote so their opinion (or lack thereof) on something doesn't matter anyway.
Do the polls talking about support for impeachment poll everyone, or 'likely voters'? Lots that can and should have been being done about it instead of the superficial stuff Democrats went after to avoid implicating themselves. Registered and likely mostly, the lower rated ones sometimes poll adults. So its fine that the Democrats are going after Trump but it would be nice if they did more. Great. But even if there was political will (which I agree there isn't) to do more. Could they? Most are not as utterly stupid as Trump & Co. Lets start with the obvious one. Bush and the Iraq war. Sure he lied to the people a bunch and misrepresented military intelligence. But what are you going to throw in him in jail for?Edit: My point is the system as it exists allows for this to happen. And you'r not going to change the system so its impossible to get all but the most obvious and stupid instances, like Trump. That? Is it a crime? This is that dangerous reliance on process to reach justice I talk about, maybe not, but the torturing people definitely is/was anyway. Not holding his administration accountable doesn't just put him joking with Ellen and Spicer dancing with the stars, it results the exact people supervising those war crimes getting promoted. If only there was an international tribunal that could judge over these things and try to hold leaders accountable. Pity America didn't sign up to it and the President is actually authorised to invade the Netherlands to 'liberate' any US personal held for trial. Americans seemed to have let that one slide, guess the people don't really care. Correct me if I'm wrong but your argument is the situation is hopeless, people don't care, so they shouldn't care and instead sustain themselves on faux accountability propaganda? To what end? Show nested quote +On November 23 2019 22:55 Gorsameth wrote:On November 23 2019 22:48 GreenHorizons wrote:On November 23 2019 22:44 Gorsameth wrote:On November 23 2019 22:35 GreenHorizons wrote:On November 23 2019 22:20 Gorsameth wrote:On November 23 2019 21:55 GreenHorizons wrote:On November 23 2019 21:45 Gorsameth wrote:On November 23 2019 21:27 GreenHorizons wrote:On November 23 2019 21:19 Gorsameth wrote: [quote]So instead of 'wasting' time on Trump with the possible payoff of winning the next Presidential election you would want them to waste time on re-writing the constitution and the entire electoral system?
No. I think that obvious cynicism is part of why support for impeachment isn't over 60% in the first place (wombat touched on this). I'm sure "lets not care about what the President does no matter how bad or blatant it is because the system has fundamental flaws that are really hard to fix" can't possibly end badly. Literally no one is making that argument? Though you seem to be making the inverse? Yes a lot of American's don't seem to give a shit about what happens, not much you can do about it. Fortunately they are also unlikely to vote so their opinion (or lack thereof) on something doesn't matter anyway.
Do the polls talking about support for impeachment poll everyone, or 'likely voters'? Lots that can and should have been being done about it instead of the superficial stuff Democrats went after to avoid implicating themselves. Registered and likely mostly, the lower rated ones sometimes poll adults. So its fine that the Democrats are going after Trump but it would be nice if they did more. Great. But even if there was political will (which I agree there isn't) to do more. Could they? Most are not as utterly stupid as Trump & Co. Lets start with the obvious one. Bush and the Iraq war. Sure he lied to the people a bunch and misrepresented military intelligence. But what are you going to throw in him in jail for? Edit: My point is the system as it exists allows for this to happen. And you'r not going to change the system so its impossible to get all but the most obvious and stupid instances, like Trump. My point is that's the white hot issue that everyone prefers to pretend matters less than Trump being bad, and use the kabuki as evidence they shouldn't be laser focused on it. People know that as soon as Trump is gone, we go right back to ignoring that the system can only (almost) hold the most obvious and stupid corruption accountable and will probably fail at even that. Neither party benefits from removing the 2 party system and the people don't give a shit to make it happen. So yes everything is going back to ignore the problems with the system because their is in interest in changing it. Yeah that sucks if your one of the people that does care. Welcome to life. Life is what we make it and arguments like yours are self-fulfilling. What you're describing is an acceptance of a neofascist capitalist oligarchy, likely because you've found a relatively comfortable position in it for the moment. I'm sure that won't end poorly... I think there's a popular poem about this? So go and do something about it and convince people to change the system. But shouting here about it constantly does nothing because as far as I know pretty much everyone here already agrees that the system isn't good and that it should be changed. So go do something about it. Arguing with me does nothing but maintain the system you allegedly lament. It boils down to the point Kwark made about not liking the existence of whiteclub, but not enough to get rid of it, while also not wanting to feel guilty about that. No, i'm saying the situation is hopeless because people don't give a shit and there is a plethora of evidence from any number of occasions that they don't give a shit.
Fortunately the roulette of birth has placed in a country with a multi party system and while accountability isn't perfect its good enough for me. And I don't really care about trying to fix America when Americans don't want it fixed themselves.
|
On November 23 2019 23:09 Gorsameth wrote:Show nested quote +On November 23 2019 23:01 GreenHorizons wrote:On November 23 2019 22:54 Gorsameth wrote:On November 23 2019 22:43 GreenHorizons wrote:On November 23 2019 22:41 Gorsameth wrote:On November 23 2019 22:32 Wombat_NI wrote:On November 23 2019 22:20 Gorsameth wrote:On November 23 2019 21:55 GreenHorizons wrote:On November 23 2019 21:45 Gorsameth wrote:On November 23 2019 21:27 GreenHorizons wrote: [quote]
No. I think that obvious cynicism is part of why support for impeachment isn't over 60% in the first place (wombat touched on this). I'm sure "lets not care about what the President does no matter how bad or blatant it is because the system has fundamental flaws that are really hard to fix" can't possibly end badly. Literally no one is making that argument? Though you seem to be making the inverse? Yes a lot of American's don't seem to give a shit about what happens, not much you can do about it. Fortunately they are also unlikely to vote so their opinion (or lack thereof) on something doesn't matter anyway.
Do the polls talking about support for impeachment poll everyone, or 'likely voters'? Lots that can and should have been being done about it instead of the superficial stuff Democrats went after to avoid implicating themselves. Registered and likely mostly, the lower rated ones sometimes poll adults. So its fine that the Democrats are going after Trump but it would be nice if they did more. Great. But even if there was political will (which I agree there isn't) to do more. Could they? Most are not as utterly stupid as Trump & Co. Lets start with the obvious one. Bush and the Iraq war. Sure he lied to the people a bunch and misrepresented military intelligence. But what are you going to throw in him in jail for?Edit: My point is the system as it exists allows for this to happen. And you'r not going to change the system so its impossible to get all but the most obvious and stupid instances, like Trump. That? Is it a crime? This is that dangerous reliance on process to reach justice I talk about, maybe not, but the torturing people definitely is/was anyway. Not holding his administration accountable doesn't just put him joking with Ellen and Spicer dancing with the stars, it results the exact people supervising those war crimes getting promoted. If only there was an international tribunal that could judge over these things and try to hold leaders accountable. Pity America didn't sign up to it and the President is actually authorised to invade the Netherlands to 'liberate' any US personal held for trial. Americans seemed to have let that one slide, guess the people don't really care. Correct me if I'm wrong but your argument is the situation is hopeless, people don't care, so they shouldn't care and instead sustain themselves on faux accountability propaganda? To what end? On November 23 2019 22:55 Gorsameth wrote:On November 23 2019 22:48 GreenHorizons wrote:On November 23 2019 22:44 Gorsameth wrote:On November 23 2019 22:35 GreenHorizons wrote:On November 23 2019 22:20 Gorsameth wrote:On November 23 2019 21:55 GreenHorizons wrote:On November 23 2019 21:45 Gorsameth wrote:On November 23 2019 21:27 GreenHorizons wrote: [quote]
No. I think that obvious cynicism is part of why support for impeachment isn't over 60% in the first place (wombat touched on this). I'm sure "lets not care about what the President does no matter how bad or blatant it is because the system has fundamental flaws that are really hard to fix" can't possibly end badly. Literally no one is making that argument? Though you seem to be making the inverse? Yes a lot of American's don't seem to give a shit about what happens, not much you can do about it. Fortunately they are also unlikely to vote so their opinion (or lack thereof) on something doesn't matter anyway.
Do the polls talking about support for impeachment poll everyone, or 'likely voters'? Lots that can and should have been being done about it instead of the superficial stuff Democrats went after to avoid implicating themselves. Registered and likely mostly, the lower rated ones sometimes poll adults. So its fine that the Democrats are going after Trump but it would be nice if they did more. Great. But even if there was political will (which I agree there isn't) to do more. Could they? Most are not as utterly stupid as Trump & Co. Lets start with the obvious one. Bush and the Iraq war. Sure he lied to the people a bunch and misrepresented military intelligence. But what are you going to throw in him in jail for? Edit: My point is the system as it exists allows for this to happen. And you'r not going to change the system so its impossible to get all but the most obvious and stupid instances, like Trump. My point is that's the white hot issue that everyone prefers to pretend matters less than Trump being bad, and use the kabuki as evidence they shouldn't be laser focused on it. People know that as soon as Trump is gone, we go right back to ignoring that the system can only (almost) hold the most obvious and stupid corruption accountable and will probably fail at even that. Neither party benefits from removing the 2 party system and the people don't give a shit to make it happen. So yes everything is going back to ignore the problems with the system because their is in interest in changing it. Yeah that sucks if your one of the people that does care. Welcome to life. Life is what we make it and arguments like yours are self-fulfilling. What you're describing is an acceptance of a neofascist capitalist oligarchy, likely because you've found a relatively comfortable position in it for the moment. I'm sure that won't end poorly... I think there's a popular poem about this? So go and do something about it and convince people to change the system. But shouting here about it constantly does nothing because as far as I know pretty much everyone here already agrees that the system isn't good and that it should be changed. So go do something about it. Arguing with me does nothing but maintain the system you allegedly lament. It boils down to the point Kwark made about not liking the existence of whiteclub, but not enough to get rid of it, while also not wanting to feel guilty about that. No, i'm saying the situation is hopeless because people don't give a shit and there is a plethora of evidence from any number of occasions that they don't give a shit. Fortunately the roulette of birth has placed in a country with a multi party system and while accountability isn't perfect its good enough for me. And I don't really care about trying to fix America when Americans don't want it fixed themselves.
So your argument is that I'm right, and people should focus on what I'm talking about instead of what they do, but you're expressing contempt and frustration at their refusal to do so. Your prescribed solution is for me to go try somewhere else (I do btw) because you're tired of this confrontation and you think you're safe over there (the economic system developed after WWII made sure you're not as a feature)?
One option for people not interested in the improvement of US politics is to be rejected by people who are, from spaces where dialogue is to happen, I think that's more productive and proactive.
|
One can do multiple things at once.
The problem is that the US citizens want to do none, and like to always point at something else that should be done whenever someone does something.
In an ideal world, the US would actually join the international war crimes tribunal, and accept that this court can also judge american citizens. Half the Bush administration would be in jail for war crimes, you would have actual health insurance, have a government that cares about climate change and tries to do something about it, Trump would be in jail (and would definitively never have been president!), lots of small-time drug dealers would not be in jail, you would have a multi-party system, US-style bribery lobbying would be illegal, and many, many other topics.
There are a lot of problems in the US. Don't complain that some people are approaching one of them when you think they should approach another.
|
On November 23 2019 23:15 GreenHorizons wrote:Show nested quote +On November 23 2019 23:09 Gorsameth wrote:On November 23 2019 23:01 GreenHorizons wrote:On November 23 2019 22:54 Gorsameth wrote:On November 23 2019 22:43 GreenHorizons wrote:On November 23 2019 22:41 Gorsameth wrote:On November 23 2019 22:32 Wombat_NI wrote:On November 23 2019 22:20 Gorsameth wrote:On November 23 2019 21:55 GreenHorizons wrote:On November 23 2019 21:45 Gorsameth wrote: [quote]I'm sure "lets not care about what the President does no matter how bad or blatant it is because the system has fundamental flaws that are really hard to fix" can't possibly end badly.
Literally no one is making that argument? Though you seem to be making the inverse? Yes a lot of American's don't seem to give a shit about what happens, not much you can do about it. Fortunately they are also unlikely to vote so their opinion (or lack thereof) on something doesn't matter anyway.
Do the polls talking about support for impeachment poll everyone, or 'likely voters'? Lots that can and should have been being done about it instead of the superficial stuff Democrats went after to avoid implicating themselves. Registered and likely mostly, the lower rated ones sometimes poll adults. So its fine that the Democrats are going after Trump but it would be nice if they did more. Great. But even if there was political will (which I agree there isn't) to do more. Could they? Most are not as utterly stupid as Trump & Co. Lets start with the obvious one. Bush and the Iraq war. Sure he lied to the people a bunch and misrepresented military intelligence. But what are you going to throw in him in jail for?Edit: My point is the system as it exists allows for this to happen. And you'r not going to change the system so its impossible to get all but the most obvious and stupid instances, like Trump. That? Is it a crime? This is that dangerous reliance on process to reach justice I talk about, maybe not, but the torturing people definitely is/was anyway. Not holding his administration accountable doesn't just put him joking with Ellen and Spicer dancing with the stars, it results the exact people supervising those war crimes getting promoted. If only there was an international tribunal that could judge over these things and try to hold leaders accountable. Pity America didn't sign up to it and the President is actually authorised to invade the Netherlands to 'liberate' any US personal held for trial. Americans seemed to have let that one slide, guess the people don't really care. Correct me if I'm wrong but your argument is the situation is hopeless, people don't care, so they shouldn't care and instead sustain themselves on faux accountability propaganda? To what end? On November 23 2019 22:55 Gorsameth wrote:On November 23 2019 22:48 GreenHorizons wrote:On November 23 2019 22:44 Gorsameth wrote:On November 23 2019 22:35 GreenHorizons wrote:On November 23 2019 22:20 Gorsameth wrote:On November 23 2019 21:55 GreenHorizons wrote:On November 23 2019 21:45 Gorsameth wrote: [quote]I'm sure "lets not care about what the President does no matter how bad or blatant it is because the system has fundamental flaws that are really hard to fix" can't possibly end badly.
Literally no one is making that argument? Though you seem to be making the inverse? Yes a lot of American's don't seem to give a shit about what happens, not much you can do about it. Fortunately they are also unlikely to vote so their opinion (or lack thereof) on something doesn't matter anyway.
Do the polls talking about support for impeachment poll everyone, or 'likely voters'? Lots that can and should have been being done about it instead of the superficial stuff Democrats went after to avoid implicating themselves. Registered and likely mostly, the lower rated ones sometimes poll adults. So its fine that the Democrats are going after Trump but it would be nice if they did more. Great. But even if there was political will (which I agree there isn't) to do more. Could they? Most are not as utterly stupid as Trump & Co. Lets start with the obvious one. Bush and the Iraq war. Sure he lied to the people a bunch and misrepresented military intelligence. But what are you going to throw in him in jail for? Edit: My point is the system as it exists allows for this to happen. And you'r not going to change the system so its impossible to get all but the most obvious and stupid instances, like Trump. My point is that's the white hot issue that everyone prefers to pretend matters less than Trump being bad, and use the kabuki as evidence they shouldn't be laser focused on it. People know that as soon as Trump is gone, we go right back to ignoring that the system can only (almost) hold the most obvious and stupid corruption accountable and will probably fail at even that. Neither party benefits from removing the 2 party system and the people don't give a shit to make it happen. So yes everything is going back to ignore the problems with the system because their is in interest in changing it. Yeah that sucks if your one of the people that does care. Welcome to life. Life is what we make it and arguments like yours are self-fulfilling. What you're describing is an acceptance of a neofascist capitalist oligarchy, likely because you've found a relatively comfortable position in it for the moment. I'm sure that won't end poorly... I think there's a popular poem about this? So go and do something about it and convince people to change the system. But shouting here about it constantly does nothing because as far as I know pretty much everyone here already agrees that the system isn't good and that it should be changed. So go do something about it. Arguing with me does nothing but maintain the system you allegedly lament. It boils down to the point Kwark made about not liking the existence of whiteclub, but not enough to get rid of it, while also not wanting to feel guilty about that. No, i'm saying the situation is hopeless because people don't give a shit and there is a plethora of evidence from any number of occasions that they don't give a shit. Fortunately the roulette of birth has placed in a country with a multi party system and while accountability isn't perfect its good enough for me. And I don't really care about trying to fix America when Americans don't want it fixed themselves. So your argument is that I'm right, and people should focus on what I'm talking about instead of what they do, but you're expressing contempt and frustration at their refusal to do so. Your prescribed solution is for me to go try somewhere else (I do btw) because you're tired of this confrontation and you think you're safe over there (the economic system developed after WWII made sure you're not as a feature)? One option for people not interested in the improvement of US politics is to be rejected by people who are, from spaces where dialogue is to happen, I think that's more productive and proactive. Sigh, again. People here agree with you that the system is shit. But tl.net doesn't have the power to change the constitution. Your preaching to the choir and doing it in a way that turns allies into enemies. As you have done with a variety of topics in the past.
|
You guys keep arguing against a (fabricated) version of my argument that doesn't think Trump should be impeached or maintaining that my argument is against holding Trump accountable, (edit: or gors argument now that this thread isn't for serious political discussion, obviously tl.net can't change the constitution and that's a silly strawman) and I can't seem to change that despite specifically arguing the opposite, so I think we're done.
|
On November 23 2019 19:55 GreenHorizons wrote: It's not complicated. Trump is obviously a megalomaniac criminal narcissist. By all appearances that's not enough to prevent him (or another in the future) from being president.
That's the bright hot thing, not that he's a criminal. That was obvious before he got elected.
edit: I can break it down further if people still don't understand my point, or someone who does can restate in a way they think you guys would understand. Trump isnt a narcissist or sociopath, he is a solipsist. Narcissists and socialpaths don't care what people think about them, but Trump doesn't even think his opposition exists. He thinks the entire world is his sandbox and all that exists are his thoughts.
|
|
|
|