| Forum Index > General Forum |
Now that we have a new thread, in order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a complete and thorough read before posting! NOTE: When providing a source, please provide a very brief summary on what it's about and what purpose it adds to the discussion. The supporting statement should clearly explain why the subject is relevant and needs to be discussed. Please follow this rule especially for tweets. Your supporting statement should always come BEFORE you provide the source. If you have any questions, comments, concern, or feedback regarding the USPMT, then please use this thread: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/website-feedback/510156-us-politics-thread | ||
|
Mohdoo
United States15398 Posts
On April 21 2018 02:17 Gorsameth wrote: The tweets seem to imply that verdict either way is highly unlikely. That makes it a lot safer from a statement standpoint. Ah, that makes sense. I take back everything then. Seems safer if all this does is forcibly inhect a bunch more evidence and hearings into it. The ole Benghazi strategy. | ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
On a lighter note, the Senate has been substantial improved by the existence of this baby. They had to change the rules because they treated all people in the senate as adults and fathers didn’t bring their babies to the senate. The dress code also had to be changed. The baby can wear whatever it wants. Hatch stepped in it real good by staying “What if there are ten babies in the Senate?” like it would be disruptive. Yeah, what if you old fart? What if we were so fucking cool that we had 10 babies in the senate breaking? What if America was greater than it has ever been? Babies are dope. | ||
|
ZerOCoolSC2
8929 Posts
| ||
|
Jockmcplop
United Kingdom9345 Posts
| ||
|
PeTraSoHot
0 Posts
On April 21 2018 02:57 Plansix wrote: Hatch stepped in it real good by staying “What if there are ten babies in the Senate?” like it would be disruptive. It would be disruptive. On April 21 2018 02:57 Plansix wrote: Babies are dope. Aren't you pro-abortion? Seems weird to think something is 'dope' that you were okay with killing the week before. User was temp banned for this post. | ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
On April 21 2018 03:30 ZerOCoolSC2 wrote: Calm down P6. We're talking about babies. Not dogs. Everyone knows are way cooler. Give me a senate with 5 dogs over 10 babies any day. I applied to a law firm that had a “firm dog” that just hung out at the office to improve office spirits. The senior partner owned it. I have never been more disappointed in not getting a job. The Senate should consider adopting the same rule and get a Senate dog to future improve decorum and civility. On April 21 2018 03:34 PeTraSoHot wrote: It would be disruptive. Aren't you pro-abortion? No one is pro-abortion. I oppose the government unlawfully restricting access to abortion for practical and ideological reasons. And Hatch is an old fart that likes to tell tall tales about how he “earned his way to law school” when he got a free ride. Disruptive for him is when other senators debate on the realities of the bills he votes for. | ||
|
Gorsameth
Netherlands21364 Posts
On April 21 2018 02:57 Plansix wrote: I could see 10 babies crying being rather disruptive to any sort of discussion.https://twitter.com/MrDanZak/status/987311779649916928 On a lighter note, the Senate has been substantial improved by the existence of this baby. They had to change the rules because they treated all people in the senate as adults and fathers didn’t bring their babies to the senate. The dress code also had to be changed. The baby can wear whatever it wants. Hatch stepped in it real good by staying “What if there are ten babies in the Senate?” like it would be disruptive. Yeah, what if you old fart? What if we were so fucking cool that we had 10 babies in the senate breaking? What if America was greater than it has ever been? Babies are dope. | ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
On April 21 2018 03:45 Gorsameth wrote: I could see 10 babies crying being rather disruptive to any sort of discussion. I have confidence that the senators could find a way to take the crying babies into the hall an office if necessary. They only need to be in the chambers when they vote. They are tasked with solving bigger problems in congress and somehow manage to do it. | ||
|
JonnyBNoHo
United States6277 Posts
On April 20 2018 18:51 A3th3r wrote: The libs want to embarrass Trump but the guy has been president for two years and will be for at least another two, regardless of what they do. It just seems like the liberals could be campaigning for the November mid-term elections instead, if they really wanted to be involved in the political process rather than just demonizing the current prez and making the opposition seem heroic 'just demonizing'? I think the growing list of guilty pleas and indictments would take issue with that description. On April 21 2018 02:57 Plansix wrote: On a lighter note, the Senate has been substantial improved by the existence of this baby. They had to change the rules because they treated all people in the senate as adults and fathers didn’t bring their babies to the senate. The dress code also had to be changed. The baby can wear whatever it wants. Hatch stepped in it real good by staying “What if there are ten babies in the Senate?” like it would be disruptive. Yeah, what if you old fart? What if we were so fucking cool that we had 10 babies in the senate breaking? What if America was greater than it has ever been? Babies are dope. I've heard 10+ babies and they reach a quorum and can form a baby senate  | ||
|
Mohdoo
United States15398 Posts
On April 21 2018 04:19 JonnyBNoHo wrote: 'just demonizing'? I think the growing list of guilty pleas and indictments would take issue with that description. I think a lot of people just assume this is the left's version of Benghazi. "Guys, we basically invented this shit, we know it is just being politically bitter. Can you please just stop?" | ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
Another state right to work state is faced with a teachers over education funding. We should not expect this to stop and it will like move over to other state employees pushed for more funding and support. My bet is these right to work states are going to continue to prompt strikes for the foreseeable future. | ||
|
IyMoon
United States1249 Posts
On April 21 2018 05:52 Plansix wrote: https://twitter.com/nprpolitics/status/987411831248576512 Another state right to work state is faced with a teachers over education funding. We should not expect this to stop and it will like move over to other state employees pushed for more funding and support. My bet is these right to work states are going to continue to prompt strikes for the foreseeable future. I don't get how people expect public servants work for no pay. We care about our kids! just as long as we don't have to pay for them. We care about roads!! just as long as we never pay for it. We care about all these things! As long as we never have to pay for it | ||
|
zlefin
United States7689 Posts
On April 21 2018 06:02 IyMoon wrote: I don't get how people expect public servants work for no pay. We care about our kids! just as long as we don't have to pay for them. We care about roads!! just as long as we never pay for it. We care about all these things! As long as we never have to pay for it because people are stupid, and others exploit that stupidity so the people poorly understand the situation due to the necessity of using heuristics on complex problems. | ||
|
Mohdoo
United States15398 Posts
On April 21 2018 06:02 IyMoon wrote: I don't get how people expect public servants work for no pay. We care about our kids! just as long as we don't have to pay for them. We care about roads!! just as long as we never pay for it. We care about all these things! As long as we never have to pay for it A lot of people see teachers as glorified babysitters. It is a very sad situation. I'm not really sure how you convince people education is something that can have enormous benefits with increasing funding/importance. | ||
|
semantics
10040 Posts
| ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
| ||
|
IyMoon
United States1249 Posts
On April 21 2018 06:52 Mohdoo wrote: A lot of people see teachers as glorified babysitters. It is a very sad situation. I'm not really sure how you convince people education is something that can have enormous benefits with increasing funding/importance. If people see teachers as babysitters they should be paid like one. Min wage per child per hour. | ||
|
Gahlo
United States35091 Posts
On April 21 2018 07:07 IyMoon wrote: If people see teachers as babysitters they should be paid like one. Min wage per child per hour. inb4 all the good teachers move to states with high min. wage. User was warned for this post | ||
|
IyMoon
United States1249 Posts
On April 21 2018 07:08 Gahlo wrote: inb4 all the good teachers move to states with high min. wage. No matter what thats 7.25 an hour. X 30 for kids in a class we are paying teachers 217 an hour. We would get some amazing teachers are that price | ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
On April 21 2018 07:08 Gahlo wrote: inb4 all the good teachers move to states with high min. wage. And then they would be like the students they were teaching in their old state, fleeing it for better pay and more employment options. That is the part that convinces me that these Republicans have no idea how to govern states. Education is the number one things families moving to a new area care about. How do you cut education budgets while your own young adults are fleeing the state? A shrinking population will cause the state economy to implode. And then they somehow hope that cutting taxes will stimulate growth by attracting businesses. Rather than having well educated potential employees to attract business. | ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War HiyA Dota 2 300Dewaltoss  123Pusan 72Sexy 32sSak 28Rock 16GoRush  15yabsab 11Shine 6Backho 5[ Show more ] Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Other Games FrodaN3522 Grubby2001 Liquid`VortiX1956 Dendi1852 elazer310 ArmadaUGS232 Trikslyr67 QueenE54 B2W.Neo49 Mew2King36 Chillindude29 JuggernautJason26 SteadfastSC4 |
|
Replay Cast
The PondCast
WardiTV Map Contest Tou…
SKillous vs MaNa
MaNa vs Cure
Cure vs SKillous
Fjant vs MaNa
Fjant vs SKillous
Fjant vs Cure
PiG Sty Festival
TLO vs Scarlett
qxc vs CatZ
Replay Cast
WardiTV Map Contest Tou…
Bunny vs Nicoract
Lambo vs Nicoract
herO vs Nicoract
Bunny vs Lambo
Bunny vs herO
Lambo vs herO
PiG Sty Festival
Lambo vs TBD
SC Evo Complete
Classic vs uThermal
SOOP StarCraft League
CranKy Ducklings
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
