Canadian Politics Mega-thread - Page 108
Forum Index > General Forum |
Although this thread does not function under the same strict guidelines as the USPMT, it is still a general practice on TL to provide a source with an explanation on why it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion. Failure to do so will result in a mod action. | ||
Billyboy
1017 Posts
| ||
JimmyJRaynor
Canada16710 Posts
" once you embark on a subsidy war with the United States then the political ability of this country to sustain the influence of the united states... to remain as an independent nation ... is lost forever..." what a great quote folks! On May 04 2025 10:18 Billyboy wrote: Wow your quote says exactly what I said, and what your source said and not what you said. Who could have possibly known that the vote meant negotiation like everyone at the time said, all of us at the time learned in school and is explained over and over again not just in your source but in every article about it. Odd that the meme's you have been taking in and believed were different. i can get most of the stuff you say about quebec out of ChatGPT. you add zero insight. Ever spent a day in Quebec? and that's the questions you'll get from me when you take the shots at me that you take. You yap away about how everything is fine in Canada and how many days in the last 5 years have you spent in its 2 biggest cities? Zero? Nurses are getting beaten to a pulp. 46% of surveyed nurses reporting exposure to physical assault 11 or more times. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10563371/ and you claim the medical profession in Canada is just fine? Go to any big city hospital dude. It is nasty. No wonder Canada stopped tracking statistics on how many Nurses are leaving Canada. anyhow, you conceded after fumbling through your chatgpt answers and figured out a 93.5% participation rate means something big. also, i added all kinds of insight. you parroted it later. and, also what memes? i make my own jokes... they're usually Nathan Fielder and Andy Kaufman type humour. They are usually not congruent with the kind of humour Ronald Reagan fans enjoy. | ||
Billyboy
1017 Posts
On May 06 2025 07:13 JimmyJRaynor wrote: BC wants to out-subsidize Trump's film tariffs? " once you embark on a subsidy war with the United States then the political ability of this country to sustain the influence of the united states... to remain as an independent nation ... is lost forever..." what a great quote folks! i can get most of the stuff you say about quebec out of ChatGPT. you add zero insight. Ever spent a day in Quebec? and that's the questions you'll get from me when you take the shots at me that you take. You yap away about how everything is fine in Canada and how many days in the last 5 years have you spent in its 2 biggest cities? Zero? anyhow, you conceded after fumbling through your chatgpt answers and figured out a 93.5% participation rate means something big. also, i added all kinds of insight. you parroted it later. and, also what memes? i make my own jokes... they're usually Nathan Fielder and Andy Kaufman type humour. They are usually not congruent with the kind of humour Ronald Reagan fans enjoy. You post dumb shit, most of it factually wrong then for some reason you never admit it but instead post sources that further prove yourself to be wrong. Participation rate means how many people participated. No one has argued it didn't or doesn't. | ||
JimmyJRaynor
Canada16710 Posts
nah, i post fun stuff. | ||
WombaT
Northern Ireland25334 Posts
I don’t recall seeing Billy claim Canada was absolutely fine, or it being some heaven for healthcare workers, to take a recent example. | ||
Fleetfeet
Canada2555 Posts
I wish you did. | ||
Hat Trick of Today
98 Posts
| ||
JimmyJRaynor
Canada16710 Posts
https://theindependent.ca/news/lji/bell-canada-scraps-labrador-high-speed-internet-project-plans-to-invest-in-u-s/ | ||
JimmyJRaynor
Canada16710 Posts
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/maxis-charity-charges-1.7548808 https://www.ctvnews.ca/business/article/judge-approves-500-million-settlement-in-loblaw-george-weston-bread-fixing-case/ The 3rd annual "Steal From Loblaws" day will be May 12, 2026. The Bay ends today. 9,300 jobs... gone. https://www.theglobeandmail.com/business/article-hudsons-bay-plan-to-save-stores-fell-short/ Insight you won't get from ChatGPT: Winners did big damage to "The Bay". IMO, Winners has just been flat out better than The Bay for over 15 years. My wife and I love shopping at Winners. The people who decide on product stocking @ Winners are geniuses at finding solid products at super low prices. | ||
WombaT
Northern Ireland25334 Posts
Bit surreal to think they’d been going longer than the likes of the United States, Germany or Italy were even countries. | ||
Fleetfeet
Canada2555 Posts
| ||
JimmyJRaynor
Canada16710 Posts
On June 02 2025 12:39 WombaT wrote: TIL it was like 350 years old and one of North America’s oldest corporations Personal Story about 1 giant "The Bay" location. + Show Spoiler + The Bay at Sherway Gardens had weak security. When I was 15 , my crime buddy and i ripped the place off for $30,000 in Dungeons and Dragons hobby equipment over the course of 6 months. Lead figures, dice, those big hard cover Dungeon Master Guides etc. At one point I had $20,000 in "product" hidden in my bedroom. LOL. These $ figures are in 2002 money. ![]() The key was to get there very early Saturday and Sunday morning when the staff were all showing up late. At store opening there'd be 2 security guys and 4 employees to cover a 225,000 square foot store. They were all half awake. Not us, we were 100% ready to rumble. Memories man! You have to wonder how major malls in Canada are going to survive as they all continue to lose giant tenants. The mall I mentioned lost its 2 cornerstone tenants, both giant retailers that have been around for many decades. | ||
kidleaderr
363 Posts
| ||
JimmyJRaynor
Canada16710 Posts
https://www.ctvnews.ca/montreal/article/quebec-legislature-votes-unanimously-to-cut-all-ties-with-the-monarchy/ oh ya, i forgot, hardly any one wants to separate from Canada which is why no one ever votes for the PQ. On June 02 2025 23:50 kidleaderr wrote: you never committed a crime in your life. you got an amazing imagination though Why did everyone pumping gas in 2003 want to get their propane license? ![]() | ||
WombaT
Northern Ireland25334 Posts
On June 02 2025 23:21 JimmyJRaynor wrote: Personal Story about 1 giant "The Bay" location. + Show Spoiler + The Bay at Sherway Gardens had weak security. When I was 15 , my crime buddy and i ripped the place off for $30,000 in Dungeons and Dragons hobby equipment over the course of 6 months. Lead figures, dice, those big hard cover Dungeon Master Guides etc. At one point I had $20,000 in "product" hidden in my bedroom. LOL. These $ figures are in 2002 money. ![]() The key was to get there very early Saturday and Sunday morning when the staff were all showing up late. At store opening there'd be 2 security guys and 4 employees to cover a 225,000 square foot store. They were all half awake. Not us, we were 100% ready to rumble. Memories man! You have to wonder how major malls in Canada are going to survive as they all continue to lose giant tenants. The mall I mentioned lost its 2 cornerstone tenants, both giant retailers that have been around for many decades. How does a store not notice $5000 dollars a month of niche hobby equipment going missing? It’s not super believable, there’s a reason prolific shoplifters rotate around stores and types of product. It blends into the shrink numbers (expected attrition from shoplifting, inventory miscounts and etc) and so an obvious pattern doesn’t develop. I’m somewhat skeptical. And by somewhat I mean very It doesn’t matter how thinly spread mall security are, security cameras are a thing. Even if this store didn’t have them, they sure as fuck would quite quickly if they’re losing this much merchandise. | ||
DarkPlasmaBall
United States44334 Posts
On June 02 2025 23:21 JimmyJRaynor wrote: Personal Story about 1 giant "The Bay" location. + Show Spoiler + The Bay at Sherway Gardens had weak security. When I was 15 , my crime buddy and i ripped the place off for $30,000 in Dungeons and Dragons hobby equipment over the course of 6 months. Lead figures, dice, those big hard cover Dungeon Master Guides etc. At one point I had $20,000 in "product" hidden in my bedroom. LOL. These $ figures are in 2002 money. ![]() The key was to get there very early Saturday and Sunday morning when the staff were all showing up late. At store opening there'd be 2 security guys and 4 employees to cover a 225,000 square foot store. They were all half awake. Not us, we were 100% ready to rumble. Memories man! You have to wonder how major malls in Canada are going to survive as they all continue to lose giant tenants. The mall I mentioned lost its 2 cornerstone tenants, both giant retailers that have been around for many decades. Adjusting for inflation, that means you're claiming to have stolen nearly $50,000 worth of D&D gear, within the span of six months, as a 15-year-old who wasn't even old enough to drive yet ( https://www.in2013dollars.com/canada/inflation/2002?amount=30000 ). Why did you do this? Also, do you have any evidence of doing this? | ||
Fleetfeet
Canada2555 Posts
| ||
JimmyJRaynor
Canada16710 Posts
The Bay got crushed by Winners. It was easy to see for anyone paying attention. I went to The Bay a week ago during their 'final blowout' and their price//product quality matched Winners for the first time in forever. Too late boys. If this is what it takes for you to finally compete with Winners... its time to pack it in. On June 03 2025 00:36 WombaT wrote: How does a store not notice $5000 dollars a month of niche hobby equipment going missing? It’s not super believable, there’s a reason prolific shoplifters rotate around stores and types of product. It blends into the shrink numbers (expected attrition from shoplifting, inventory miscounts and etc) and so an obvious pattern doesn’t develop. I’m somewhat skeptical. And by somewhat I mean very It doesn’t matter how thinly spread mall security are, security cameras are a thing. Even if this store didn’t have them, they sure as fuck would quite quickly if they’re losing this much merchandise. it is a 225,000 square foot location. how did they miss it? lousy security. they are far more concerned about the $10,000 watches and the $20,000 jewelry items on the main floor than the loser section of the hobby area tucked away in the corner of the store. shoplifting that got caught occurred 86,000 times in 2003. What about the stuff not caught? + Show Spoiler + In 2003, Canada experienced a significant number of retail theft incidents, with shoplifting accounting for approximately 12% of all reported thefts. This translates to over 86,000 shoplifting incidents nationwide, based on the total of more than 720,000 thefts reported that year (excluding motor vehicle thefts and thefts during break-ins) . Statistics Canada The breakdown of theft types in 2003 was as follows: Thefts from motor vehicles: 38% Shoplifting: 12% Bicycle thefts: 9% Other thefts (including personal accessories, electronics, money, and identification): 42% BBC +3 Statistics Canada +3 Government of Canada Publications +3 Overall, thefts constituted 55% of all property crimes and 28% of all Criminal Code offences in Canada that year. The national theft rate increased by 4% compared to 2002, with Manitoba experiencing the largest provincial increase at 18%, primarily due to a 21% rise in Winnipeg. This surge was partly attributed to the implementation of a telephone reporting system, which led to more minor offences, such as thefts and mischief, being reported to the police . Statistics Canada These statistics highlight the prevalence of shoplifting and its impact on the overall crime landscape in Canada during 2003. The stores were huge with hardly any employees... it is all explained here: + Show Spoiler + Yes, Hudson's Bay (also known as The Bay) did face significant retail theft issues during the 2000s, though it wasn’t always as widely publicized as recent retail theft crises. Here’s a breakdown of the situation: 🔍 Theft at Hudson’s Bay in the 2000s Like many large department stores, The Bay faced ongoing challenges with shoplifting and employee theft throughout the decade. In 2003–2005, as the company struggled with financial pressures and restructuring, theft became a bigger concern. Shrinkage (a term for inventory loss due to theft and error) was consistently a major factor affecting the company's profitability. Reports at the time indicated that organized retail crime rings and opportunistic shoplifters targeted large stores like The Bay because they had less aggressive security measures than smaller specialty shops. Employee theft, often considered part of the shrinkage problem, also played a role, as The Bay’s vast inventory made it easier for internal theft to occur without detection. Despite having loss prevention teams, the sheer size of stores and high customer volume made it difficult to police every theft. 📊 Industry Context Hudson’s Bay was not unique; retail theft across Canada was estimated at $3-4 billion annually in the 2000s. According to Retail Council of Canada reports at the time, department stores like The Bay were among the most targeted by shoplifters, due to the wide product range, multiple exits, and large floor space. 🛡️ Response The Bay increased surveillance in some stores, but its loss prevention budgets were often constrained by larger corporate cost-cutting efforts. Security measures like cameras and electronic article surveillance (EAS) tags were used but not always as widespread or updated as they are today. So, yes—while The Bay may not have faced epidemic levels of theft during the 2000s, it certainly grappled with consistent and costly retail theft problems that mirrored challenges across the retail industry during that time. and there is the Catch-22. They want to lower theft rates while spending zero resources on making that happen. We were running in mid-day form every Saturday morning while what few bored, sleepy, lazy employees that made it there in the morning were loafing in the lunch room. The Bay wants to make 87 bazillion dollars every day with 5 employees in a 225,000 square foot store. To quote the great 20th Century philosopher Hulk Hogan: "That doesn't work for me, brother." The employees knew loss prevention was impossible given the tools at their disposal so they just relaxed and didn't take it personally. Do me and my gang of idiot friends count as an "organized retail crime ring" ? LOL. we had balls. i'll give us credit for that. On June 02 2025 12:39 WombaT wrote: there’s a reason prolific shoplifters rotate around stores and types of product. It blends into the shrink numbers (expected attrition from shoplifting, inventory miscounts and etc) and so an obvious pattern doesn’t develop. good point, we also went to the Bay stores at the biggest shopping mall in Toronto's 2 biggest suburbs. | ||
Sermokala
United States13931 Posts
That you somehow were also a successful criminal that was hitting up other sites with your fellow teenage friends without a car is also much less believable. When people commit crimes like that they usually feel shame or guilt about what they did and don't talk about it. Bragging about being a shitty person is either you being shitty or you lying, which one do you want us to assume you are doing? | ||
WombaT
Northern Ireland25334 Posts
On June 03 2025 09:07 Sermokala wrote: They're going to notice when tens of thousands of dollars worth of product is going missing over months. Once or twice would have been believable but there is no way you would get away with a crime spree over a span of months where you cleaned out a specific place over and over and over again taking a very specific type of product. That you somehow were also a successful criminal that was hitting up other sites with your fellow teenage friends without a car is also much less believable. When people commit crimes like that they usually feel shame or guilt about what they did and don't talk about it. Bragging about being a shitty person is either you being shitty or you lying, which one do you want us to assume you are doing? I know what a mall looks like. It’s a big place with lots of individual shops dotted around. You’ve some security guys covering the actual mall itself, more to deter anti-social behaviour than police theft within stores. Which either guards paid by said store do, or alternatively just regular staff who can also call upon mall security if needed. Is my impression of roughly how an American mall works. We don’t really have them. Ours are more like, just take a bunch of independent stores in a street and ram them in a building. You don’t really have a Paul Blart type or whatever the fuck he’s called. What Jimmy is describing sounds like some gigantic open store with all sorts of goods in various areas, and like a handful of general staff covering the whole thing. I’m envisioning like a big outdoor market, except there’s like 5 people sort of dandering about trying to oversee the thing. Is that a thing in either the North of North America, or the South of North America? I really don’t know I can see the giant general store part. I can see the understaffed part but like, not remotely to that degree. I can also see one being successful at shoplifting for long periods without being caught if it’s very understaffed. What Jimmy describes is rather far-fetched, not impossible but hey. I’ve spent more time than I’d like in retail, I don’t think we’re particular geniuses over here but one of two things would happen: 1. Hm, we’re losing quite a lot of high value DnD stuff. Even assuming pretty irregular stock checks, that’s not avoiding notice for too long. We’ll not catch them in the act, what we will do is keep checking that section more and more regularly for stock irregularities. Maybe multiple times daily. One of our cameras will be pointed at that section. If say, we notice a load of shit missing between Thursday close and Friday afternoon, it is then rather trivial to figure out what camera footage to check. You will get caught. 2. Hm, we’re losing a bunch of DnD shit, we can’t be arsed investigating, we’ll just stop ordering it in. Nice job Jimmy, you just took everyone else’s toys away! There are some real fundamental problems with Jimmy’s bullshitting here, and as usual he conflates many things, wrongly. General shoplifting versus someone lifting thousands of dollars of the same product . Retail builds it into their numbers that some degree of theft is impossible to stop. Potentially hundreds of people sneaking the odd item here and there, yes, basically impossible while maintaining a functional store. Two people lifting thousands of dollars of a niche product, consistently from the same place. Not impossible to stop. Quite easy in fact. Some workers don’t really care about shoplifting, but they’re much less blasé than Jimmy appears to believe. Some care out of principle, some start to care when a superior starts giving them shit about 5000 dollars a month solely of DnD paraphernalia starts going missing. | ||
| ||