User was warned for this post
Pope Benedict XVI to resign - Page 23
Forum Index > General Forum |
Alright, enough religious debate. If you want to talk about Pope Benedict and what he specifically did or didn't do, go ahead. But no more general discussion on the merits or ills of the Catholic church or their history. -page 12 | ||
bjwithbraces
United States549 Posts
User was warned for this post | ||
Foblos
United States426 Posts
On February 12 2013 14:45 Warlock40 wrote: I would say that's a general trend in Europe that includes Catholicism as well. In fact, last time I checked, the only religion in Europe that wasn't just losing ground but gaining ground was Islam. That isn't true. Christianity (Eastern and Western: Protestant and Catholic) is still growing in membership and adherents, but Islam is growing much faster. Part of that reason is because in the places where what we refer to as 'radicals' are spreading the religion by the sword, but that isn't what this topic is about. | ||
Ghostcom
Denmark4781 Posts
On February 12 2013 15:20 Foblos wrote: That isn't true. Christianity (Eastern and Western: Protestant and Catholic) is still growing in membership and adherents, but Islam is growing much faster. Part of that reason is because in the places where what we refer to as 'radicals' are spreading the religion by the sword, but that isn't what this topic is about. Inside Europe? I somehow doubt that - the only thing I could find was this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_in_Europe Do you have any better sources? | ||
Foblos
United States426 Posts
On February 12 2013 15:35 Ghostcom wrote: Inside Europe? I somehow doubt that - the only thing I could find was this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_in_Europe Do you have any better sources? I don't have any links ready to give you, but Gallup and Pew Research groups both operate in Europe and poll things along the lines of what you and I are talking about. If you'd like to look, you should be able to find something recent in either of those two places. Europe probably has some of their own polling and societal research groups that you should be able to check with as well, but I'm not aware of any. | ||
Ghostcom
Denmark4781 Posts
On February 12 2013 16:02 Foblos wrote: I don't have any links ready to give you, but Gallup and Pew Research groups both operate in Europe and poll things along the lines of what you and I are talking about. If you'd like to look, you should be able to find something recent in either of those two places. Europe probably has some of their own polling and societal research groups that you should be able to check with as well, but I'm not aware of any. The wiki article is based on Gallup which says that the numbers of christians (protestant and catholics) are dwindling in Europe. | ||
Discarder
Philippines411 Posts
On February 11 2013 20:17 lord_nibbler wrote: Darkforce = Pope = same person maybe? LOL I suppose. | ||
Golden Ghost
Netherlands1041 Posts
Also if I were a betting man my money for the new pope would be on eather Odilo Scherer (63), the Archbisshop of Sao Paolo or Peter Turkson (63) from Ghana with Luis Tagle (55) from the Phillipenes as an outsider. If there would have been a viable American candidate that would probably be a safe bet but I don´t see real contender amongst their cardinals. | ||
Sandermatt
Switzerland1365 Posts
On February 12 2013 18:58 Golden Ghost wrote: I don´t know what the numbers are for other European countries but in the Netherlands the numbers are indeed dwindling VERY rapid. Churches closing left and right, almost no new people coming in and a lot of people dieing because well they are very old. Also if I were a betting man my money for the new pope would be on eather Odilo Scherer (63), the Archbisshop of Sao Paolo or Peter Turkson (63) from Ghana with Luis Tagle (55) from the Phillipenes as an outsider. If there would have been a viable American candidate that would probably be a safe bet but I don´t see real contender amongst their cardinals. When was the last time that a pope was elected who was not a cardinal? I know in medieval times they once elected a pope that was not even a priest. | ||
Sephyr
Australia665 Posts
Honestly not sure if it's been posted before but just saw that. I think it's a funny coincidence but it seems the Christians on my Facebook think otherwise.. | ||
Golden Ghost
Netherlands1041 Posts
On February 12 2013 21:21 Sandermatt wrote: When was the last time that a pope was elected who was not a cardinal? I know in medieval times they once elected a pope that was not even a priest. I have no clue but all three persons I named are cardinals. You are never ONLY cardinal. You normally first become bisshop or archbisshop before being named cardinal. The only exception on this is if you have obtained a very influencial position in the church (VERY unusual without being a bisshop anyway but theoretically possible) but are already older as 80. It those cases you are made something resembling an honorary cardinal. Because of your age you then are not required to take on anymore burdons like a bisshop´s seat. No cardinal that is 80 or older can vote in the election of a new pope btw. For a link to a list with all cardinals see one of my previous posts. | ||
vividred
88 Posts
On February 12 2013 09:08 lord_nibbler wrote: He is a lot more left to US liberals than you seem to realize. He talked about the sins of the modern investment bankers and that societies should strife for fair distribution of wealth. He went to Lebanon in 2010 and practically called out the US for arming the rebels and enlarging the war. And they called him a conservative pope... The pope is neither left, right, conservative or liberal. Stop spouting shit | ||
Geneq
Poland165 Posts
http://www.theonion.com/articles/resigning-pope-no-longer-has-strength-to-lead-chur,31248/ | ||
Djzapz
Canada10681 Posts
On February 12 2013 22:23 vividred wrote: The pope is neither left, right, conservative or liberal. Stop spouting shit Explain yourself because you don't get to tell people they're "spouting shit" without any argument. I'd like to remind you that the church has been extremely influential politically. To say that the pope is not anywhere on the political spectrum despite the fact that he influences policy in some countries just makes me confused. | ||
vividred
88 Posts
On February 13 2013 00:32 Djzapz wrote: Explain yourself because you don't get to tell people they're "spouting shit" without any argument. I'd like to remind you that the church has been extremely influential politically. To say that the pope is not anywhere on the political spectrum despite the fact that he influences policy in some countries just makes me confused. see: On February 12 2013 09:10 sAsImre wrote: Pope stance is related to morale, a system which put the economy before the human will never satisfy the church but it doesn't qualify the pope. | ||
ZasZ.
United States2911 Posts
Have an explanation that doesn't seem like gibberish? I don't expect the Pope to lean left or right on economics or fiscal policy, but when people are talking about wanting a "liberal" Pope, they're talking about his stance on gays, contraceptives, female priests, etc. and whether or not the Catholic Church might be more open to discussing reform on these topics. They are by no means obligated to, but one would think they need to keep up with the times if they want to retain their constituency in developed nations, where Catholicism has been dwindling rapidly. | ||
KwarK
United States41470 Posts
On February 12 2013 21:30 Sephyr wrote: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LaZdmeV56PU Honestly not sure if it's been posted before but just saw that. I think it's a funny coincidence but it seems the Christians on my Facebook think otherwise.. Clearly Zeus is angry at him. | ||
llIH
Norway2142 Posts
| ||
vividred
88 Posts
On February 13 2013 01:13 ZasZ. wrote: Have an explanation that doesn't seem like gibberish? I don't expect the Pope to lean left or right on economics or fiscal policy, but when people are talking about wanting a "liberal" Pope, they're talking about his stance on gays, contraceptives, female priests, etc. and whether or not the Catholic Church might be more open to discussing reform on these topics. They are by no means obligated to, but one would think they need to keep up with the times if they want to retain their constituency in developed nations, where Catholicism has been dwindling rapidly. Roman Catholic or any other religion is never in the political compass. Just because they oppose contraceptives/premarital sex etc. doesn't mean they are on the opposite side of what you call "progressivism" or "liberalism" They follow their dogma or the bible or whatever and doesn't mean they're "conservative" You're like saying jesus christ is a republican. | ||
HeeroFX
United States2704 Posts
| ||
KwarK
United States41470 Posts
On February 13 2013 01:23 vividred wrote: Roman Catholic or any other religion is never in the political compass. Just because they oppose contraceptives/premarital sex etc. doesn't mean they are on the opposite side of what you call "progressivism" or "liberalism" They follow their dogma or the bible or whatever and doesn't mean they're "conservative" You're like saying jesus christ is a republican. Jesus Christ was socialist and a populist. That's not even disputable. It's very easy to place Jesus on a political spectrum, we have four accounts of his speeches, policies and views on wealth and society. Following his death the members of the early church sold their possessions and formed a classless commune in which they provided for people from the common pool of wealth according to their need. It's all there in the book of acts. The Holy Spirit even struck down Ananias for lying about his wealth and refusing to contribute his share. That doesn't mean that religion has to be political but Jesus' teachings can certainly be found in modern politics in fairly radical communist parties. | ||
| ||