• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 05:43
CEST 11:43
KST 18:43
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall10HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy6
Community News
Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation5$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced4Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles6[BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China9Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL66
StarCraft 2
General
Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation Jim claims he and Firefly were involved in match-fixing
Tourneys
$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series WardiTV Mondays
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome Mutation # 478 Instant Karma
Brood War
General
[G] Progamer Settings i aint gon lie to u bruh... ASL20 Preliminary Maps BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ [ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall
Tourneys
[BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China [BSL20] Grand Finals - Sunday 20:00 CET CSL Xiamen International Invitational The Casual Games of the Week Thread
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Path of Exile What do you want from future RTS games? Beyond All Reason
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Summer Games Done Quick 2025! Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2025 Football Thread NBA General Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
Culture Clash in Video Games…
TrAiDoS
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 560 users

Pope Benedict XVI to resign - Page 22

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 20 21 22 23 24 26 Next All
Alright, enough religious debate. If you want to talk about Pope Benedict and what he specifically did or didn't do, go ahead. But no more general discussion on the merits or ills of the Catholic church or their history.

-page 12
Shiori
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
3815 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-02-12 00:59:12
February 12 2013 00:56 GMT
#421
On February 12 2013 09:50 KwarK wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 12 2013 09:48 Shiori wrote:
On February 12 2013 09:32 KwarK wrote:
On February 12 2013 09:08 lord_nibbler wrote:
On February 12 2013 07:26 vividred wrote:
L-liberal... Pope?

uhh what? unless the so called "liberal" defined here in the US is what you're talking about then LOL

He is a lot more left to US liberals than you seem to realize.

He talked about the sins of the modern investment bankers and that societies should strife for fair distribution of wealth.

You realise that he is sitting upon a massive amount of money taken from the poorest people from around the world when he says that, right? And that the money flows in only one direction.
Yes, at a time at which the poorest people in the world, a lot of whom were Catholic, were suffering leaped on the "greed is evil" bandwagon but he did it while being more morally bankrupt than the bankers were and without even paying taxes on the Vatican's vast investments.

Presenting anyone at the Vatican as socialist is a joke, they accumulate colossal amounts of wealth.

Uh..Catholic charities are utterly massive (largest in the world, taken together). If you seriously believe that the Pope is sitting there counting bills and sitting on coins, I'm not sure what to tell you. A very large amount of money flows directly back into charitable works.

(Not that I would even dream of calling the Vatican socialist)

Paid for predominantly by the Catholics themselves, not the Vatican. I'm not denying that Christian communities have the capability to show compassion, nor that they do charitable work. I'm pointing out that the institution of the Vatican itself has a vast investment portfolio which it fights tooth and nail to keep tax exempt and the value of which dwarfs the amount they spend on charity.

Please tell me you're not referring to the whole "Mussolini's Millions" thing? A substantial portion of the Vatican's economy is donations.

I'm not exactly sure where you're getting morally bankrupt from. I won't disagree that the Church is too stingy with its funds, but by this logic every country should have sold all their marketable stocks to funnel money into charity, which is only realistic if you're the most extreme sort of communist.
MountainDewJunkie
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
United States10341 Posts
February 12 2013 00:57 GMT
#422
I didn't even know the pope could quit! You learn something new everyday.
[21:07] <Shock710> whats wrong with her face [20:50] <dAPhREAk> i beat it the day after it came out | <BLinD-RawR> esports is a giant vagina
Mischke
Profile Joined January 2011
United States17 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-02-12 01:22:03
February 12 2013 00:59 GMT
#423
I'm a fucking donkey

User was banned for this post which was then edited by KwarK for the purpose of comedy.
KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States42555 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-02-12 01:09:20
February 12 2013 01:00 GMT
#424
On February 12 2013 09:56 Shiori wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 12 2013 09:50 KwarK wrote:
On February 12 2013 09:48 Shiori wrote:
On February 12 2013 09:32 KwarK wrote:
On February 12 2013 09:08 lord_nibbler wrote:
On February 12 2013 07:26 vividred wrote:
L-liberal... Pope?

uhh what? unless the so called "liberal" defined here in the US is what you're talking about then LOL

He is a lot more left to US liberals than you seem to realize.

He talked about the sins of the modern investment bankers and that societies should strife for fair distribution of wealth.

You realise that he is sitting upon a massive amount of money taken from the poorest people from around the world when he says that, right? And that the money flows in only one direction.
Yes, at a time at which the poorest people in the world, a lot of whom were Catholic, were suffering leaped on the "greed is evil" bandwagon but he did it while being more morally bankrupt than the bankers were and without even paying taxes on the Vatican's vast investments.

Presenting anyone at the Vatican as socialist is a joke, they accumulate colossal amounts of wealth.

Uh..Catholic charities are utterly massive (largest in the world, taken together). If you seriously believe that the Pope is sitting there counting bills and sitting on coins, I'm not sure what to tell you. A very large amount of money flows directly back into charitable works.

(Not that I would even dream of calling the Vatican socialist)

Paid for predominantly by the Catholics themselves, not the Vatican. I'm not denying that Christian communities have the capability to show compassion, nor that they do charitable work. I'm pointing out that the institution of the Vatican itself has a vast investment portfolio which it fights tooth and nail to keep tax exempt and the value of which dwarfs the amount they spend on charity.

Please tell me you're not referring to the whole "Mussolini's Millions" thing? A substantial portion of the Vatican's economy is donations.

I'm not exactly sure where you're getting morally bankrupt from. I won't disagree that the Church is too stingy with its funds, but by this logic every country should have sold all their marketable stocks to funnel money into charity, which is only realistic if you're the most extreme sort of communist.

I don't believe so. The Vatican has always owned a lot of stuff all over Europe. In Italy alone (not talking about the Vatican, in Italy) it has $12b of commercial and residential property, all of which they claim tax exempt status on.

Most countries don't tax their people to increase the big pot of money they're sitting on. They tax the people to buy stuff to do the things the people elected them to do. The government of a normal country giving all its tax revenue to charity would be breaking the social contract and failing to do what it was elected to do. The Vatican is accountable only to their own consciences so they can do however they please and what they choose to do is dodge taxes and hoard. Again, not Christians in general who are charitable people, I'm talking about the institution of the Vatican.
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
Mohdoo
Profile Joined August 2007
United States15663 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-02-12 01:02:09
February 12 2013 01:00 GMT
#425
On February 12 2013 09:57 MountainDewJunkie wrote:
I didn't even know the pope could quit! You learn something new everyday.


Pretty sure he's being pressured to step down in return for them not making public his involvement with covering up sexual abuse.

On February 12 2013 10:00 KwarK wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 12 2013 09:56 Shiori wrote:
On February 12 2013 09:50 KwarK wrote:
On February 12 2013 09:48 Shiori wrote:
On February 12 2013 09:32 KwarK wrote:
On February 12 2013 09:08 lord_nibbler wrote:
On February 12 2013 07:26 vividred wrote:
L-liberal... Pope?

uhh what? unless the so called "liberal" defined here in the US is what you're talking about then LOL

He is a lot more left to US liberals than you seem to realize.

He talked about the sins of the modern investment bankers and that societies should strife for fair distribution of wealth.

You realise that he is sitting upon a massive amount of money taken from the poorest people from around the world when he says that, right? And that the money flows in only one direction.
Yes, at a time at which the poorest people in the world, a lot of whom were Catholic, were suffering leaped on the "greed is evil" bandwagon but he did it while being more morally bankrupt than the bankers were and without even paying taxes on the Vatican's vast investments.

Presenting anyone at the Vatican as socialist is a joke, they accumulate colossal amounts of wealth.

Uh..Catholic charities are utterly massive (largest in the world, taken together). If you seriously believe that the Pope is sitting there counting bills and sitting on coins, I'm not sure what to tell you. A very large amount of money flows directly back into charitable works.

(Not that I would even dream of calling the Vatican socialist)

Paid for predominantly by the Catholics themselves, not the Vatican. I'm not denying that Christian communities have the capability to show compassion, nor that they do charitable work. I'm pointing out that the institution of the Vatican itself has a vast investment portfolio which it fights tooth and nail to keep tax exempt and the value of which dwarfs the amount they spend on charity.

Please tell me you're not referring to the whole "Mussolini's Millions" thing?

I don't believe so. The Vatican has always owned a lot of stuff all over Europe. In Italy alone it has $12b of commercial and residential property, all of which they claim tax exempt status on.


That's absolutely insane. Seriously? I can't believe people let that fly. That is an insane amount of money.
Shiori
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
3815 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-02-12 01:11:02
February 12 2013 01:09 GMT
#426
On February 12 2013 10:00 KwarK wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 12 2013 09:56 Shiori wrote:
On February 12 2013 09:50 KwarK wrote:
On February 12 2013 09:48 Shiori wrote:
On February 12 2013 09:32 KwarK wrote:
On February 12 2013 09:08 lord_nibbler wrote:
On February 12 2013 07:26 vividred wrote:
L-liberal... Pope?

uhh what? unless the so called "liberal" defined here in the US is what you're talking about then LOL

He is a lot more left to US liberals than you seem to realize.

He talked about the sins of the modern investment bankers and that societies should strife for fair distribution of wealth.

You realise that he is sitting upon a massive amount of money taken from the poorest people from around the world when he says that, right? And that the money flows in only one direction.
Yes, at a time at which the poorest people in the world, a lot of whom were Catholic, were suffering leaped on the "greed is evil" bandwagon but he did it while being more morally bankrupt than the bankers were and without even paying taxes on the Vatican's vast investments.

Presenting anyone at the Vatican as socialist is a joke, they accumulate colossal amounts of wealth.

Uh..Catholic charities are utterly massive (largest in the world, taken together). If you seriously believe that the Pope is sitting there counting bills and sitting on coins, I'm not sure what to tell you. A very large amount of money flows directly back into charitable works.

(Not that I would even dream of calling the Vatican socialist)

Paid for predominantly by the Catholics themselves, not the Vatican. I'm not denying that Christian communities have the capability to show compassion, nor that they do charitable work. I'm pointing out that the institution of the Vatican itself has a vast investment portfolio which it fights tooth and nail to keep tax exempt and the value of which dwarfs the amount they spend on charity.

Please tell me you're not referring to the whole "Mussolini's Millions" thing? A substantial portion of the Vatican's economy is donations.

I'm not exactly sure where you're getting morally bankrupt from. I won't disagree that the Church is too stingy with its funds, but by this logic every country should have sold all their marketable stocks to funnel money into charity, which is only realistic if you're the most extreme sort of communist.

I don't believe so. The Vatican has always owned a lot of stuff all over Europe. In Italy alone it has $12b of commercial and residential property, all of which they claim tax exempt status on.

Most countries don't tax their people to increase the big pot of money they're sitting on. They tax the people to buy stuff to do the things the people elected them to do. The government of a normal country giving all its tax revenue to charity would be breaking the social contract and failing to do what it was elected to do. The Vatican is accountable only to their own consciences so they can do however they please and what they choose to do is dodge taxes and hoard.

The Vatican doesn't tax its citizens. They also no longer have tax exempt status on their commercial properties, to my knowledge.
KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States42555 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-02-12 01:20:32
February 12 2013 01:15 GMT
#427
On February 12 2013 10:09 Shiori wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 12 2013 10:00 KwarK wrote:
On February 12 2013 09:56 Shiori wrote:
On February 12 2013 09:50 KwarK wrote:
On February 12 2013 09:48 Shiori wrote:
On February 12 2013 09:32 KwarK wrote:
On February 12 2013 09:08 lord_nibbler wrote:
On February 12 2013 07:26 vividred wrote:
L-liberal... Pope?

uhh what? unless the so called "liberal" defined here in the US is what you're talking about then LOL

He is a lot more left to US liberals than you seem to realize.

He talked about the sins of the modern investment bankers and that societies should strife for fair distribution of wealth.

You realise that he is sitting upon a massive amount of money taken from the poorest people from around the world when he says that, right? And that the money flows in only one direction.
Yes, at a time at which the poorest people in the world, a lot of whom were Catholic, were suffering leaped on the "greed is evil" bandwagon but he did it while being more morally bankrupt than the bankers were and without even paying taxes on the Vatican's vast investments.

Presenting anyone at the Vatican as socialist is a joke, they accumulate colossal amounts of wealth.

Uh..Catholic charities are utterly massive (largest in the world, taken together). If you seriously believe that the Pope is sitting there counting bills and sitting on coins, I'm not sure what to tell you. A very large amount of money flows directly back into charitable works.

(Not that I would even dream of calling the Vatican socialist)

Paid for predominantly by the Catholics themselves, not the Vatican. I'm not denying that Christian communities have the capability to show compassion, nor that they do charitable work. I'm pointing out that the institution of the Vatican itself has a vast investment portfolio which it fights tooth and nail to keep tax exempt and the value of which dwarfs the amount they spend on charity.

Please tell me you're not referring to the whole "Mussolini's Millions" thing? A substantial portion of the Vatican's economy is donations.

I'm not exactly sure where you're getting morally bankrupt from. I won't disagree that the Church is too stingy with its funds, but by this logic every country should have sold all their marketable stocks to funnel money into charity, which is only realistic if you're the most extreme sort of communist.

I don't believe so. The Vatican has always owned a lot of stuff all over Europe. In Italy alone it has $12b of commercial and residential property, all of which they claim tax exempt status on.

Most countries don't tax their people to increase the big pot of money they're sitting on. They tax the people to buy stuff to do the things the people elected them to do. The government of a normal country giving all its tax revenue to charity would be breaking the social contract and failing to do what it was elected to do. The Vatican is accountable only to their own consciences so they can do however they please and what they choose to do is dodge taxes and hoard.

The Vatican doesn't tax its citizens.

I don't see your point. You suggested that the Vatican was no different from any other country because all governments attempt to raise money and none spend it all on feeding the hungry. I pointed out that most governments (basically any except states being ransacked by a warlord before he goes into exile) raise money to spend on the business of running the country and don't generally operate at much of a profit whereas the Vatican works much more like an investment portfolio and do make profits. Furthermore in a democratic state using funds levied from the people in a way they would not want breaks the social contract but the Vatican, which does not tax people, has no such restraints. Therefore your suggestion that the Vatican is not uniquely morally bankrupt because other countries don't spend their entire revenue on feeding Africa is nonsensical.

There have been attempts in the last 12 months to change the tax exempt status of the Vatican's investment portfolios in Italy but it's not done yet and, like any other big business, it is being fought by their influential lobbyists while their accountants hide as much money.
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
DocTheMedic
Profile Joined January 2011
United States79 Posts
February 12 2013 01:25 GMT
#428
On February 12 2013 09:50 KwarK wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 12 2013 09:48 Shiori wrote:
On February 12 2013 09:32 KwarK wrote:
On February 12 2013 09:08 lord_nibbler wrote:
On February 12 2013 07:26 vividred wrote:
L-liberal... Pope?

uhh what? unless the so called "liberal" defined here in the US is what you're talking about then LOL

He is a lot more left to US liberals than you seem to realize.

He talked about the sins of the modern investment bankers and that societies should strife for fair distribution of wealth.

You realise that he is sitting upon a massive amount of money taken from the poorest people from around the world when he says that, right? And that the money flows in only one direction.
Yes, at a time at which the poorest people in the world, a lot of whom were Catholic, were suffering leaped on the "greed is evil" bandwagon but he did it while being more morally bankrupt than the bankers were and without even paying taxes on the Vatican's vast investments.

Presenting anyone at the Vatican as socialist is a joke, they accumulate colossal amounts of wealth.

Uh..Catholic charities are utterly massive (largest in the world, taken together). If you seriously believe that the Pope is sitting there counting bills and sitting on coins, I'm not sure what to tell you. A very large amount of money flows directly back into charitable works.

(Not that I would even dream of calling the Vatican socialist)

Paid for predominantly by the Catholics themselves, not the Vatican. I'm not denying that Christian communities have the capability to show compassion, nor that they do charitable work. I'm pointing out that the institution of the Vatican itself has a vast investment portfolio which it fights tooth and nail to keep tax exempt and the value of which dwarfs the amount they spend on charity.


Even if that were the case (and you have to provide sources and deal with issues where money is spent/to be spent on constructing more monuments and places of worship which worshipers generally VERY MUCH are in favor of), all this would amount to an ad hominem argument. One can easily offer up liberal arguments regardless of their finances.
Shiori
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
3815 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-02-12 01:28:30
February 12 2013 01:25 GMT
#429
On February 12 2013 10:15 KwarK wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 12 2013 10:09 Shiori wrote:
On February 12 2013 10:00 KwarK wrote:
On February 12 2013 09:56 Shiori wrote:
On February 12 2013 09:50 KwarK wrote:
On February 12 2013 09:48 Shiori wrote:
On February 12 2013 09:32 KwarK wrote:
On February 12 2013 09:08 lord_nibbler wrote:
On February 12 2013 07:26 vividred wrote:
L-liberal... Pope?

uhh what? unless the so called "liberal" defined here in the US is what you're talking about then LOL

He is a lot more left to US liberals than you seem to realize.

He talked about the sins of the modern investment bankers and that societies should strife for fair distribution of wealth.

You realise that he is sitting upon a massive amount of money taken from the poorest people from around the world when he says that, right? And that the money flows in only one direction.
Yes, at a time at which the poorest people in the world, a lot of whom were Catholic, were suffering leaped on the "greed is evil" bandwagon but he did it while being more morally bankrupt than the bankers were and without even paying taxes on the Vatican's vast investments.

Presenting anyone at the Vatican as socialist is a joke, they accumulate colossal amounts of wealth.

Uh..Catholic charities are utterly massive (largest in the world, taken together). If you seriously believe that the Pope is sitting there counting bills and sitting on coins, I'm not sure what to tell you. A very large amount of money flows directly back into charitable works.

(Not that I would even dream of calling the Vatican socialist)

Paid for predominantly by the Catholics themselves, not the Vatican. I'm not denying that Christian communities have the capability to show compassion, nor that they do charitable work. I'm pointing out that the institution of the Vatican itself has a vast investment portfolio which it fights tooth and nail to keep tax exempt and the value of which dwarfs the amount they spend on charity.

Please tell me you're not referring to the whole "Mussolini's Millions" thing? A substantial portion of the Vatican's economy is donations.

I'm not exactly sure where you're getting morally bankrupt from. I won't disagree that the Church is too stingy with its funds, but by this logic every country should have sold all their marketable stocks to funnel money into charity, which is only realistic if you're the most extreme sort of communist.

I don't believe so. The Vatican has always owned a lot of stuff all over Europe. In Italy alone it has $12b of commercial and residential property, all of which they claim tax exempt status on.

Most countries don't tax their people to increase the big pot of money they're sitting on. They tax the people to buy stuff to do the things the people elected them to do. The government of a normal country giving all its tax revenue to charity would be breaking the social contract and failing to do what it was elected to do. The Vatican is accountable only to their own consciences so they can do however they please and what they choose to do is dodge taxes and hoard.

The Vatican doesn't tax its citizens.

I don't see your point. You suggested that the Vatican was no different from any other country because all governments attempt to raise money and none spend it all on feeding the hungry. I pointed out that most governments (basically any except states being ransacked by a warlord before he goes into exile) raise money to spend on the business of running the country and don't generally operate at much of a profit whereas the Vatican works much more like an investment portfolio and do make profits. Furthermore in a democratic state using funds levied from the people in a way they would not want breaks the social contract but the Vatican, which does not tax people, has no such restraints. Therefore your suggestion that the Vatican is not uniquely morally bankrupt because other countries don't spend their entire revenue on feeding Africa is nonsensical.

There have been attempts in the last 12 months to change the tax exempt status of the Vatican's investment portfolios in Italy but it's not done yet and, like any other big business, it is being fought by their influential lobbyists while their accountants hide as much money.

EDIT: Actually, this is way off topic.
KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States42555 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-02-12 01:30:33
February 12 2013 01:28 GMT
#430
On February 12 2013 10:25 Shiori wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 12 2013 10:15 KwarK wrote:
On February 12 2013 10:09 Shiori wrote:
On February 12 2013 10:00 KwarK wrote:
On February 12 2013 09:56 Shiori wrote:
On February 12 2013 09:50 KwarK wrote:
On February 12 2013 09:48 Shiori wrote:
On February 12 2013 09:32 KwarK wrote:
On February 12 2013 09:08 lord_nibbler wrote:
On February 12 2013 07:26 vividred wrote:
L-liberal... Pope?

uhh what? unless the so called "liberal" defined here in the US is what you're talking about then LOL

He is a lot more left to US liberals than you seem to realize.

He talked about the sins of the modern investment bankers and that societies should strife for fair distribution of wealth.

You realise that he is sitting upon a massive amount of money taken from the poorest people from around the world when he says that, right? And that the money flows in only one direction.
Yes, at a time at which the poorest people in the world, a lot of whom were Catholic, were suffering leaped on the "greed is evil" bandwagon but he did it while being more morally bankrupt than the bankers were and without even paying taxes on the Vatican's vast investments.

Presenting anyone at the Vatican as socialist is a joke, they accumulate colossal amounts of wealth.

Uh..Catholic charities are utterly massive (largest in the world, taken together). If you seriously believe that the Pope is sitting there counting bills and sitting on coins, I'm not sure what to tell you. A very large amount of money flows directly back into charitable works.

(Not that I would even dream of calling the Vatican socialist)

Paid for predominantly by the Catholics themselves, not the Vatican. I'm not denying that Christian communities have the capability to show compassion, nor that they do charitable work. I'm pointing out that the institution of the Vatican itself has a vast investment portfolio which it fights tooth and nail to keep tax exempt and the value of which dwarfs the amount they spend on charity.

Please tell me you're not referring to the whole "Mussolini's Millions" thing? A substantial portion of the Vatican's economy is donations.

I'm not exactly sure where you're getting morally bankrupt from. I won't disagree that the Church is too stingy with its funds, but by this logic every country should have sold all their marketable stocks to funnel money into charity, which is only realistic if you're the most extreme sort of communist.

I don't believe so. The Vatican has always owned a lot of stuff all over Europe. In Italy alone it has $12b of commercial and residential property, all of which they claim tax exempt status on.

Most countries don't tax their people to increase the big pot of money they're sitting on. They tax the people to buy stuff to do the things the people elected them to do. The government of a normal country giving all its tax revenue to charity would be breaking the social contract and failing to do what it was elected to do. The Vatican is accountable only to their own consciences so they can do however they please and what they choose to do is dodge taxes and hoard.

The Vatican doesn't tax its citizens.

I don't see your point. You suggested that the Vatican was no different from any other country because all governments attempt to raise money and none spend it all on feeding the hungry. I pointed out that most governments (basically any except states being ransacked by a warlord before he goes into exile) raise money to spend on the business of running the country and don't generally operate at much of a profit whereas the Vatican works much more like an investment portfolio and do make profits. Furthermore in a democratic state using funds levied from the people in a way they would not want breaks the social contract but the Vatican, which does not tax people, has no such restraints. Therefore your suggestion that the Vatican is not uniquely morally bankrupt because other countries don't spend their entire revenue on feeding Africa is nonsensical.

There have been attempts in the last 12 months to change the tax exempt status of the Vatican's investment portfolios in Italy but it's not done yet and, like any other big business, it is being fought by their influential lobbyists while their accountants hide as much money.

Editing my post out following the editing out of the one I was replying to in order to respect his wish to discontinue this line of discussion.
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
Rassy
Profile Joined August 2010
Netherlands2308 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-02-12 01:40:39
February 12 2013 01:37 GMT
#431
On February 12 2013 10:15 KwarK wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 12 2013 10:09 Shiori wrote:
On February 12 2013 10:00 KwarK wrote:
On February 12 2013 09:56 Shiori wrote:
On February 12 2013 09:50 KwarK wrote:
On February 12 2013 09:48 Shiori wrote:
On February 12 2013 09:32 KwarK wrote:
On February 12 2013 09:08 lord_nibbler wrote:
On February 12 2013 07:26 vividred wrote:
L-liberal... Pope?

uhh what? unless the so called "liberal" defined here in the US is what you're talking about then LOL

He is a lot more left to US liberals than you seem to realize.

He talked about the sins of the modern investment bankers and that societies should strife for fair distribution of wealth.

You realise that he is sitting upon a massive amount of money taken from the poorest people from around the world when he says that, right? And that the money flows in only one direction.
Yes, at a time at which the poorest people in the world, a lot of whom were Catholic, were suffering leaped on the "greed is evil" bandwagon but he did it while being more morally bankrupt than the bankers were and without even paying taxes on the Vatican's vast investments.

Presenting anyone at the Vatican as socialist is a joke, they accumulate colossal amounts of wealth.

Uh..Catholic charities are utterly massive (largest in the world, taken together). If you seriously believe that the Pope is sitting there counting bills and sitting on coins, I'm not sure what to tell you. A very large amount of money flows directly back into charitable works.

(Not that I would even dream of calling the Vatican socialist)

Paid for predominantly by the Catholics themselves, not the Vatican. I'm not denying that Christian communities have the capability to show compassion, nor that they do charitable work. I'm pointing out that the institution of the Vatican itself has a vast investment portfolio which it fights tooth and nail to keep tax exempt and the value of which dwarfs the amount they spend on charity.

Please tell me you're not referring to the whole "Mussolini's Millions" thing? A substantial portion of the Vatican's economy is donations.

I'm not exactly sure where you're getting morally bankrupt from. I won't disagree that the Church is too stingy with its funds, but by this logic every country should have sold all their marketable stocks to funnel money into charity, which is only realistic if you're the most extreme sort of communist.

I don't believe so. The Vatican has always owned a lot of stuff all over Europe. In Italy alone it has $12b of commercial and residential property, all of which they claim tax exempt status on.

Most countries don't tax their people to increase the big pot of money they're sitting on. They tax the people to buy stuff to do the things the people elected them to do. The government of a normal country giving all its tax revenue to charity would be breaking the social contract and failing to do what it was elected to do. The Vatican is accountable only to their own consciences so they can do however they please and what they choose to do is dodge taxes and hoard.

The Vatican doesn't tax its citizens.

I don't see your point. You suggested that the Vatican was no different from any other country because all governments attempt to raise money and none spend it all on feeding the hungry. I pointed out that most governments (basically any except states being ransacked by a warlord before he goes into exile) raise money to spend on the business of running the country and don't generally operate at much of a profit whereas the Vatican works much more like an investment portfolio and do make profits. Furthermore in a democratic state using funds levied from the people in a way they would not want breaks the social contract but the Vatican, which does not tax people, has no such restraints. Therefore your suggestion that the Vatican is not uniquely morally bankrupt because other countries don't spend their entire revenue on feeding Africa is nonsensical.

There have been attempts in the last 12 months to change the tax exempt status of the Vatican's investment portfolios in Italy but it's not done yet and, like any other big business, it is being fought by their influential lobbyists while their accountants hide as much money.


Well;The vatican is an independant state and has been so for a long time. So it can set its own taxes and to tax it for the whole of italy is maybe desirable but would just be theft from another country.
There are more countrys wich have a big investment portfolio, like the gulf states,norway, probably swiss and luxembourg,or one of the tax heaven islands.That alone does not make them anny less of a state.
KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States42555 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-02-12 01:52:03
February 12 2013 01:40 GMT
#432
On February 12 2013 10:37 Rassy wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 12 2013 10:15 KwarK wrote:
On February 12 2013 10:09 Shiori wrote:
On February 12 2013 10:00 KwarK wrote:
On February 12 2013 09:56 Shiori wrote:
On February 12 2013 09:50 KwarK wrote:
On February 12 2013 09:48 Shiori wrote:
On February 12 2013 09:32 KwarK wrote:
On February 12 2013 09:08 lord_nibbler wrote:
On February 12 2013 07:26 vividred wrote:
L-liberal... Pope?

uhh what? unless the so called "liberal" defined here in the US is what you're talking about then LOL

He is a lot more left to US liberals than you seem to realize.

He talked about the sins of the modern investment bankers and that societies should strife for fair distribution of wealth.

You realise that he is sitting upon a massive amount of money taken from the poorest people from around the world when he says that, right? And that the money flows in only one direction.
Yes, at a time at which the poorest people in the world, a lot of whom were Catholic, were suffering leaped on the "greed is evil" bandwagon but he did it while being more morally bankrupt than the bankers were and without even paying taxes on the Vatican's vast investments.

Presenting anyone at the Vatican as socialist is a joke, they accumulate colossal amounts of wealth.

Uh..Catholic charities are utterly massive (largest in the world, taken together). If you seriously believe that the Pope is sitting there counting bills and sitting on coins, I'm not sure what to tell you. A very large amount of money flows directly back into charitable works.

(Not that I would even dream of calling the Vatican socialist)

Paid for predominantly by the Catholics themselves, not the Vatican. I'm not denying that Christian communities have the capability to show compassion, nor that they do charitable work. I'm pointing out that the institution of the Vatican itself has a vast investment portfolio which it fights tooth and nail to keep tax exempt and the value of which dwarfs the amount they spend on charity.

Please tell me you're not referring to the whole "Mussolini's Millions" thing? A substantial portion of the Vatican's economy is donations.

I'm not exactly sure where you're getting morally bankrupt from. I won't disagree that the Church is too stingy with its funds, but by this logic every country should have sold all their marketable stocks to funnel money into charity, which is only realistic if you're the most extreme sort of communist.

I don't believe so. The Vatican has always owned a lot of stuff all over Europe. In Italy alone it has $12b of commercial and residential property, all of which they claim tax exempt status on.

Most countries don't tax their people to increase the big pot of money they're sitting on. They tax the people to buy stuff to do the things the people elected them to do. The government of a normal country giving all its tax revenue to charity would be breaking the social contract and failing to do what it was elected to do. The Vatican is accountable only to their own consciences so they can do however they please and what they choose to do is dodge taxes and hoard.

The Vatican doesn't tax its citizens.

I don't see your point. You suggested that the Vatican was no different from any other country because all governments attempt to raise money and none spend it all on feeding the hungry. I pointed out that most governments (basically any except states being ransacked by a warlord before he goes into exile) raise money to spend on the business of running the country and don't generally operate at much of a profit whereas the Vatican works much more like an investment portfolio and do make profits. Furthermore in a democratic state using funds levied from the people in a way they would not want breaks the social contract but the Vatican, which does not tax people, has no such restraints. Therefore your suggestion that the Vatican is not uniquely morally bankrupt because other countries don't spend their entire revenue on feeding Africa is nonsensical.

There have been attempts in the last 12 months to change the tax exempt status of the Vatican's investment portfolios in Italy but it's not done yet and, like any other big business, it is being fought by their influential lobbyists while their accountants hide as much money.


Well;The vatican is an independant state,and has be so for a long time.So it can set its own taxes and to tax it for the whole of italy is maybe desirable but would just be theft from another country.
There are more countrys wich have a big investment portfolio, like the gulf states and probably swiss and luxembourg,
That alone does not make them anny less of a state.

You're confused about what I meant. I'm not talking about properties within the Vatican which is obviously a separate nation and should not be taxed by Italy. I'm talking about how the Vatican owns about 20% of property in Italy and yet refuses to pay tax on the profits of their operations to the Italian government.

To bring this back to the initial topic of the discussion though, I think the suggestion that Benedict's criticism of investment bankers at the height of the economic crisis does not earn him any socialist credentials as he is the governor of one of the largest investment banks in the world. This topic isn't really the place to condemn him for that, rather just to show that his echoing of a global sentiment was not backed up by any action and does not amount to a change in the Vatican policy.
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-02-12 02:37:18
February 12 2013 02:36 GMT
#433
The Catholic Church owns hotels, restaurants, it even has had it's own banking scandals, several in fact. Whether a Pope is chosen from Ghana or Mexico makes no nevermind to the monetary discussion but rather the social arguments. Billions to Africa for education, safe sex practices, to drug violence. Or Condoms are sin etc.
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
[UoN]Sentinel
Profile Blog Joined November 2009
United States11320 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-02-12 03:32:03
February 12 2013 03:27 GMT
#434
I'ma go read up on the Vatican's properties and such before I get into that argument, but first:

I really do want to see a Pope Peter now. Just to see what happens with that prophecy. I could see the Cardinals playing along and choosing popes based on the description in each line of it, but some are too uncanny to be plotted in advance, like Pope JP2 dying on a solar eclipse (also being born on one), and the WW1 pope who was powerless to stop Christians from killing each other and Communism spreading in multiple Christian (and non-Christian, it never specified which religion was being destroyed) nations. Your mileage may vary I guess. But I still want to see a Pope Peter.
Нас зовет дух отцов, память старых бойцов, дух Москвы и твердыня Полтавы
GrandMaster_07
Profile Blog Joined June 2012
Peru52 Posts
February 12 2013 04:10 GMT
#435
Pope Benedict=Galactic Emperor?!?!
I am owning.
Sandermatt
Profile Joined December 2010
Switzerland1365 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-02-12 05:02:34
February 12 2013 04:52 GMT
#436
On February 12 2013 11:36 {CC}StealthBlue wrote:
The Catholic Church owns hotels, restaurants, it even has had it's own banking scandals, several in fact. Whether a Pope is chosen from Ghana or Mexico makes no nevermind to the monetary discussion but rather the social arguments. Billions to Africa for education, safe sex practices, to drug violence. Or Condoms are sin etc.


As I hear african priests tend to be more conservative. And currently a large part of the charity in africa is done by the caholic church.
The protestants state churches here in Europ do everything people often mention they want see from a new pope. Their priests can marry, they ordinate women, allow condoms. The result is that they are shrinking rapidly. A new pope gains nothing from pleasing people who will never actually support the catholic church.
If the catholic church wants to remain relevant it has to be separate from political power and separate from Zeitgeist influences.
emc
Profile Joined September 2010
United States3088 Posts
February 12 2013 05:43 GMT
#437
They should make a movie out of this.

This Spring... POPE 15. Rated R
Warlock40
Profile Joined September 2011
601 Posts
February 12 2013 05:45 GMT
#438
The protestants state churches here in Europ do everything people often mention they want see from a new pope. Their priests can marry, they ordinate women, allow condoms. The result is that they are shrinking rapidly. A new pope gains nothing from pleasing people who will never actually support the catholic church.


I would say that's a general trend in Europe that includes Catholicism as well. In fact, last time I checked, the only religion in Europe that wasn't just losing ground but gaining ground was Islam.
koreasilver
Profile Blog Joined June 2008
9109 Posts
February 12 2013 05:55 GMT
#439
On February 12 2013 13:52 Sandermatt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 12 2013 11:36 {CC}StealthBlue wrote:
The Catholic Church owns hotels, restaurants, it even has had it's own banking scandals, several in fact. Whether a Pope is chosen from Ghana or Mexico makes no nevermind to the monetary discussion but rather the social arguments. Billions to Africa for education, safe sex practices, to drug violence. Or Condoms are sin etc.


As I hear african priests tend to be more conservative. And currently a large part of the charity in africa is done by the caholic church.
The protestants state churches here in Europ do everything people often mention they want see from a new pope. Their priests can marry, they ordinate women, allow condoms. The result is that they are shrinking rapidly. A new pope gains nothing from pleasing people who will never actually support the catholic church.
If the catholic church wants to remain relevant it has to be separate from political power and separate from Zeitgeist influences.

State churches as a whole have lost a great deal of standing among Protestants for a long while now. Kierkegaard's acute criticisms of the Danish Church was taken up with great fervor by Protestants post-WWI, most particularly with Barth and the Confessing Church in Germany against the German State Church that had become a wing of the Nazi machine. And the European trend has been towards a greater number of atheists and irreligious persons. It isn't confined to Protestantism or Catholicism but just a general decline of Christianity. To say that the Protestants are shrinking in Europe because of their progressive tendencies is really just hilariously wrong.

And good luck with the whole separation from political power idea when the Vatican is the single most political Christian organization in the world, and that hasn't changed for over a millennium. Even the Protestant Reformation didn't change that.
Sandermatt
Profile Joined December 2010
Switzerland1365 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-02-12 06:12:24
February 12 2013 05:55 GMT
#440
On February 12 2013 14:45 Warlock40 wrote:
Show nested quote +
The protestants state churches here in Europ do everything people often mention they want see from a new pope. Their priests can marry, they ordinate women, allow condoms. The result is that they are shrinking rapidly. A new pope gains nothing from pleasing people who will never actually support the catholic church.


I would say that's a general trend in Europe that includes Catholicism as well. In fact, last time I checked, the only religion in Europe that wasn't just losing ground but gaining ground was Islam.


Ok, I looked the numbers up in wikipedia. In Germany both sides are loosing members equally fast. Here in Switzerland (where I live) the protestant shrink twice as fast.
I cannot remember seeing a church grow that just does everything the way public opinion is.
Here in switzerland most free churches that grow will cause some kind of public "panic" with "Sektenexperte" giving warnings, newspapers beeing shocked, etc...

So long story short: People here mentioned hat to stay relevant the new pope will have to take liberal stances, but in practice I have rarely seen a church getting more relevant by taking a more liberal stance.



P.S: I am not a catholic. The church I go to is the "salvation army" and the most influencial pastor for me would be Gregory Boyd. Both could be seen as somewhere in between liberal and conservative positions.
Prev 1 20 21 22 23 24 26 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 17m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft: Brood War
firebathero 4535
Shuttle 1218
actioN 457
Larva 396
Stork 346
TY 242
Hyuk 197
Mini 191
Soma 184
Zeus 175
[ Show more ]
EffOrt 120
Pusan 83
ToSsGirL 77
Nal_rA 74
PianO 69
sSak 54
sorry 47
JulyZerg 33
Noble 30
hero 30
Sharp 24
Rush 20
Sacsri 18
Barracks 13
IntoTheRainbow 6
zelot 3
ivOry 1
Dota 2
Gorgc6069
XaKoH 583
XcaliburYe253
League of Legends
singsing701
JimRising 446
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K223
Other Games
tarik_tv24345
shahzam856
ceh9480
Happy370
Fuzer 269
crisheroes240
monkeys_forever157
Pyrionflax108
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick32732
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH382
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• lizZardDota2177
League of Legends
• HappyZerGling114
Other Games
• WagamamaTV63
Upcoming Events
The PondCast
17m
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
6h 17m
WardiTV European League
6h 17m
Jumy vs NightPhoenix
Percival vs Nicoract
ArT vs HiGhDrA
MaxPax vs Harstem
Scarlett vs Shameless
SKillous vs uThermal
Replay Cast
14h 17m
RSL Revival
1d
ByuN vs SHIN
Clem vs Reynor
OSC
1d 3h
Replay Cast
1d 14h
RSL Revival
2 days
Classic vs Cure
FEL
2 days
OSC
2 days
[ Show More ]
RSL Revival
3 days
FEL
3 days
FEL
3 days
CSO Cup
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
Bonyth vs QiaoGege
Dewalt vs Fengzi
Hawk vs Zhanhun
Sziky vs Mihu
Mihu vs QiaoGege
Zhanhun vs Sziky
Fengzi vs Hawk
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
RSL Revival
4 days
FEL
4 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
4 days
Bonyth vs Dewalt
QiaoGege vs Dewalt
Hawk vs Bonyth
Sziky vs Fengzi
Mihu vs Zhanhun
QiaoGege vs Zhanhun
Fengzi vs Mihu
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-07-07
HSC XXVII
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
Acropolis #3
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025

Upcoming

2025 ACS Season 2: Qualifier
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSL Xiamen Invitational
2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
SEL Season 2 Championship
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
Underdog Cup #2
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.