|
On October 11 2012 07:01 FabledIntegral wrote:Show nested quote +On October 11 2012 07:00 jyuj wrote: They are a private organization and they have the right of free speech, which includes right of association. Same reason why a church cannot be forced to marry a Gay couple, or a place of worship to be forced for that matter. If you don't like the BSA, just don't send your kid there. Simple enough ? The issue is them being the recipient of government funding as well. Agreed, a private can do whatever they privately want. The issue is with regards to any tax payer spending or state spending.
|
On October 11 2012 02:56 kmillz wrote:Show nested quote +On October 11 2012 02:39 Smat wrote:On October 11 2012 01:17 kmillz wrote:I am always baffled when I hear "there is no connection between homosexuality and pedophilia" as the argument for lifting the ban in BSA. While it is true that there is no connection, most pedophiles are male so the concern of females sexually abusing a boy scout should be significantly lower than of men. "Most sexual offenders against children are male, although female offenders may account for 0.4% to 4% of convicted sexual offenders. On the basis of a range of published reports, McConaghy estimates a 10 to 1 ratio of male-to-female child molesters." A male pedophile who abuses little boys IS a homosexual. While that does not mean homosexuals are pedophiles, lifting the ban on gays would completely open that door for more pedophiles to prey on small boys because they no longer have to pretend like they are straight. http://www.psychiatrictimes.com/display/article/10168/1420331 Is Jeff Sandusky a homosexual? Because I believe he has a loving wife and multiple children. Openly gay men are less likely to abuse boys than straight (by the boyscouts definition) men, you heard it here. I'd love to have a study to throw at you, oh well. Go watch the South Park episode on it buddy. You cite one example of a closet gay and pedophile and use that to support your argument that openly gay men are less likely to abuse boys than straight? That's funny, because last time I checked a man who was straight doesn't touch boys.
Gay men don't touch boys either, unless they are secretly pedophiles. Straight men don't touch boys either, unless they are secretly pedophiles. See the common denominator here, and why it is retarded to discriminate based on the "likelyhood" of being a pedophile. Following your logic they should ban men from leading boyscouts and personally, I don't think that would be such a bad idea. Why do they allow men to lead boyscouts when men are far more likely to abuse the boys involved?
|
On October 11 2012 05:27 dAPhREAk wrote:Show nested quote +On October 11 2012 05:24 shizaep wrote:On October 11 2012 05:23 Olinim wrote:On October 11 2012 05:18 shizaep wrote:On October 11 2012 05:06 Olinim wrote:On October 11 2012 05:02 shizaep wrote:On October 10 2012 13:20 dAPhREAk wrote:On October 10 2012 13:18 Djzapz wrote:On October 10 2012 13:02 dAPhREAk wrote: its okay for the BSA to stick to their views.
its okay for people to boycott them for their views. I used to think like that, but in retrospect, people don't necessarily stand up for minorities and we can't trust them to do it. Not every time. i have a problem with the trend of people/government deciding how other people should think, or what they should believe. You say it's okay for people to stick for their views but right after you go on to say that it's okay for people to "boycott" or "punish" them for sharing these views, implying that it is, in fact, not okay to uphold these views. If you thought it was okay for the BSA to uphold their views, you would let them be and not go on forums to criticize their beliefs because they are not like yours, which are obviously "correct". He probably means it's okay in the sense that they have a legal right to do that. Not that he won't criticize their backwards beliefs or boycott them because of it, just that he wouldn't try to pass a law about it or force them to change. Yes, if you think that these beliefs are "backwards", by all means go ahead, I commend you for sticking up for them. The BSA thinks that your beliefs are backwards and they can stand up for them too. I believe that if they want to, they can. Just because you share a belief about how society should function, doesn't necessarily mean it should function that way. Live your own life and let the BSA live theirs. Don't hate them for it and don't "boycott" them. Just disagree with them and leave them alone. Why? Part of sticking up for my beliefs is not supporting (boycotting) people that discriminate against gays. Don't tell me who I should or shouldn't hate. If you hate people who aren't pro-homosexuality, then by the same logic, people who aren't pro-homosexuality have every right to do the same to you. agreed wholeheartedly.
I do not understand why we let such horrible logic slip by. Being Christian is a choice. Being gay is not a choice. Your choices can be criticized and ridiculed. Things that are not your choice cannot.
If you choose to believe that 2+2 = 6 then I can call you stupid and laugh at you. I cannot laugh at someone for being born black or blonde.
|
Hopefully sexual orientation will be added to the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Then the BSA won't be allowed to continue this nonsense anymore.
|
Seems like being religious is more likely to draw haters than being gay these days. Lucky me, I'm neither.
|
United States2306 Posts
On October 11 2012 09:49 kmillz wrote: Seems like being religious is more likely to draw haters than being gay these days. Lucky me, I'm neither.
That may be so but the reasons people "hate" said people have nothing in common. Difference being some religious people are openly bigoted towards gays. It's like comparing hating racists and hating black people.
|
On October 09 2012 00:43 MooMu wrote:Boy Scouts of America Rejects Eagle Scout Status to Gay MemberBSA standing up for their backwards policies against homosexuals yet again. I respect their firm stance on this issue as it will make it more abundantly clear that this organization is inimical to a compassionate and progressive society and culture. I propose they change their name to The Faggotless Boy Scouts of America (FBSA) to avoid any further issues in the future. Maybe also add "For the Living Christ" as an addendum. [Redacted - I was pissed. You understand] Don't support the BSA until they get their shit together and join the rest of us in modernity.
only in MERICA...
In U.S., 46% Hold Creationist View of Human Origins
USA USA USA
Need we say more? they are super stupid and i really dont see a change coming for them =)
I mean.look at this ![[image loading]](http://sas-origin.onstreammedia.com/origin/gallupinc/GallupSpaces/Production/Cms/POLL/p_yjcwwaxuor-xzl2te4qa.gif)
hahahaha
User was temp banned for this post.
|
United States2306 Posts
Show nested quote +On October 11 2012 10:07 th0 wrote:On October 09 2012 00:43 MooMu wrote:Boy Scouts of America Rejects Eagle Scout Status to Gay MemberBSA standing up for their backwards policies against homosexuals yet again. I respect their firm stance on this issue as it will make it more abundantly clear that this organization is inimical to a compassionate and progressive society and culture. I propose they change their name to The Faggotless Boy Scouts of America (FBSA) to avoid any further issues in the future. Maybe also add "For the Living Christ" as an addendum. [Redacted - I was pissed. You understand] Don't support the BSA until they get their shit together and join the rest of us in modernity. only in MERICA... In U.S., 46% Hold Creationist View of Human Origins USA USA USANeed we say more? they are super stupid and i really dont see a change coming for them =) I mean.look at this ![[image loading]](http://sas-origin.onstreammedia.com/origin/gallupinc/GallupSpaces/Production/Cms/POLL/p_yjcwwaxuor-xzl2te4qa.gif) hahahaha
I think you're confused about what thread you're in?
|
On October 11 2012 10:07 th0 wrote:Show nested quote +On October 09 2012 00:43 MooMu wrote:Boy Scouts of America Rejects Eagle Scout Status to Gay MemberBSA standing up for their backwards policies against homosexuals yet again. I respect their firm stance on this issue as it will make it more abundantly clear that this organization is inimical to a compassionate and progressive society and culture. I propose they change their name to The Faggotless Boy Scouts of America (FBSA) to avoid any further issues in the future. Maybe also add "For the Living Christ" as an addendum. [Redacted - I was pissed. You understand] Don't support the BSA until they get their shit together and join the rest of us in modernity. only in MERICA... In U.S., 46% Hold Creationist View of Human Origins USA USA USANeed we say more? they are super stupid and i really dont see a change coming for them =) I mean.look at this ![[image loading]](http://sas-origin.onstreammedia.com/origin/gallupinc/GallupSpaces/Production/Cms/POLL/p_yjcwwaxuor-xzl2te4qa.gif) hahahaha
BAHAHAHAHAHA
...
Wait whats so funny...
oh yea...
BAHAHAHAHAHAH...
wait wut
|
On October 11 2012 10:07 th0 wrote:Show nested quote +On October 09 2012 00:43 MooMu wrote:Boy Scouts of America Rejects Eagle Scout Status to Gay MemberBSA standing up for their backwards policies against homosexuals yet again. I respect their firm stance on this issue as it will make it more abundantly clear that this organization is inimical to a compassionate and progressive society and culture. I propose they change their name to The Faggotless Boy Scouts of America (FBSA) to avoid any further issues in the future. Maybe also add "For the Living Christ" as an addendum. [Redacted - I was pissed. You understand] Don't support the BSA until they get their shit together and join the rest of us in modernity. + Show Spoiler +only in MERICA... In U.S., 46% Hold Creationist View of Human Origins USA USA USANeed we say more? they are super stupid and i really dont see a change coming for them =) I mean.look at this ![[image loading]](http://sas-origin.onstreammedia.com/origin/gallupinc/GallupSpaces/Production/Cms/POLL/p_yjcwwaxuor-xzl2te4qa.gif) hahahaha would you say they are dumber than the dude from norway who goes on an american website and bashes americans?
|
United States2306 Posts
|
United States24574 Posts
173.231.136.216 United States New York New York City Voxel Dot Net Inc.
How you determine what country this website is from, I'm not sure.
Making fun of people because they hold what you think to be dumb ideas is very questionable though. You aren't exactly making the world a better place if you know what I mean.
|
On October 11 2012 07:48 Klondikebar wrote:Show nested quote +On October 11 2012 05:27 dAPhREAk wrote:On October 11 2012 05:24 shizaep wrote:On October 11 2012 05:23 Olinim wrote:On October 11 2012 05:18 shizaep wrote:On October 11 2012 05:06 Olinim wrote:On October 11 2012 05:02 shizaep wrote:On October 10 2012 13:20 dAPhREAk wrote:On October 10 2012 13:18 Djzapz wrote:On October 10 2012 13:02 dAPhREAk wrote: its okay for the BSA to stick to their views.
its okay for people to boycott them for their views. I used to think like that, but in retrospect, people don't necessarily stand up for minorities and we can't trust them to do it. Not every time. i have a problem with the trend of people/government deciding how other people should think, or what they should believe. You say it's okay for people to stick for their views but right after you go on to say that it's okay for people to "boycott" or "punish" them for sharing these views, implying that it is, in fact, not okay to uphold these views. If you thought it was okay for the BSA to uphold their views, you would let them be and not go on forums to criticize their beliefs because they are not like yours, which are obviously "correct". He probably means it's okay in the sense that they have a legal right to do that. Not that he won't criticize their backwards beliefs or boycott them because of it, just that he wouldn't try to pass a law about it or force them to change. Yes, if you think that these beliefs are "backwards", by all means go ahead, I commend you for sticking up for them. The BSA thinks that your beliefs are backwards and they can stand up for them too. I believe that if they want to, they can. Just because you share a belief about how society should function, doesn't necessarily mean it should function that way. Live your own life and let the BSA live theirs. Don't hate them for it and don't "boycott" them. Just disagree with them and leave them alone. Why? Part of sticking up for my beliefs is not supporting (boycotting) people that discriminate against gays. Don't tell me who I should or shouldn't hate. If you hate people who aren't pro-homosexuality, then by the same logic, people who aren't pro-homosexuality have every right to do the same to you. agreed wholeheartedly. I do not understand why we let such horrible logic slip by. Being Christian is a choice. Being gay is not a choice. Your choices can be criticized and ridiculed. Things that are not your choice cannot. If you choose to believe that 2+2 = 6 then I can call you stupid and laugh at you. I cannot laugh at someone for being born black or blonde.
Wait, I have a question. Can you link me to a good study where it deems homosexuality isn't a choice? I've read many different studies which contradict each other. Yes, Christianity, as well as any religion is a choice. However, in my mind, I believe your gender orientation is also a choice. There isn't a gene that makes you like one sex over the other from my understanding.
|
On October 11 2012 10:07 th0 wrote:Show nested quote +On October 09 2012 00:43 MooMu wrote:Boy Scouts of America Rejects Eagle Scout Status to Gay MemberBSA standing up for their backwards policies against homosexuals yet again. I respect their firm stance on this issue as it will make it more abundantly clear that this organization is inimical to a compassionate and progressive society and culture. I propose they change their name to The Faggotless Boy Scouts of America (FBSA) to avoid any further issues in the future. Maybe also add "For the Living Christ" as an addendum. [Redacted - I was pissed. You understand] Don't support the BSA until they get their shit together and join the rest of us in modernity. only in MERICA... In U.S., 46% Hold Creationist View of Human Origins USA USA USANeed we say more? they are super stupid and i really dont see a change coming for them =) I mean.look at this ![[image loading]](http://sas-origin.onstreammedia.com/origin/gallupinc/GallupSpaces/Production/Cms/POLL/p_yjcwwaxuor-xzl2te4qa.gif) hahahaha I know that I'm generalizing (which is a little unfair to the hordes of decent and thoughtful people who take issue with the BSA's stance against homosexuality), but this (and the OP) represents exactly the sort of smug, vicious elitism I associate with the most vocal opponents of the scouts.
|
United States2306 Posts
On October 11 2012 11:19 Shin_Gouki wrote:Show nested quote +On October 11 2012 07:48 Klondikebar wrote:On October 11 2012 05:27 dAPhREAk wrote:On October 11 2012 05:24 shizaep wrote:On October 11 2012 05:23 Olinim wrote:On October 11 2012 05:18 shizaep wrote:On October 11 2012 05:06 Olinim wrote:On October 11 2012 05:02 shizaep wrote:On October 10 2012 13:20 dAPhREAk wrote:On October 10 2012 13:18 Djzapz wrote: [quote] I used to think like that, but in retrospect, people don't necessarily stand up for minorities and we can't trust them to do it. Not every time. i have a problem with the trend of people/government deciding how other people should think, or what they should believe. You say it's okay for people to stick for their views but right after you go on to say that it's okay for people to "boycott" or "punish" them for sharing these views, implying that it is, in fact, not okay to uphold these views. If you thought it was okay for the BSA to uphold their views, you would let them be and not go on forums to criticize their beliefs because they are not like yours, which are obviously "correct". He probably means it's okay in the sense that they have a legal right to do that. Not that he won't criticize their backwards beliefs or boycott them because of it, just that he wouldn't try to pass a law about it or force them to change. Yes, if you think that these beliefs are "backwards", by all means go ahead, I commend you for sticking up for them. The BSA thinks that your beliefs are backwards and they can stand up for them too. I believe that if they want to, they can. Just because you share a belief about how society should function, doesn't necessarily mean it should function that way. Live your own life and let the BSA live theirs. Don't hate them for it and don't "boycott" them. Just disagree with them and leave them alone. Why? Part of sticking up for my beliefs is not supporting (boycotting) people that discriminate against gays. Don't tell me who I should or shouldn't hate. If you hate people who aren't pro-homosexuality, then by the same logic, people who aren't pro-homosexuality have every right to do the same to you. agreed wholeheartedly. I do not understand why we let such horrible logic slip by. Being Christian is a choice. Being gay is not a choice. Your choices can be criticized and ridiculed. Things that are not your choice cannot. If you choose to believe that 2+2 = 6 then I can call you stupid and laugh at you. I cannot laugh at someone for being born black or blonde. Wait, I have a question. Can you link me to a good study where it deems homosexuality isn't a choice? I've read many different studies which contradict each other. Yes, Christianity, as well as any religion is a choice. However, in my mind, I believe your gender orientation is also a choice. There isn't a gene that makes you like one sex over the other from my understanding.
maybe i don't understand gay people but why would they choose to be gay? if they thought in the same ways as most of us straight guys they likely wouldn't consider being gay. of course i don't know shit about homosexuality, i just can't fathom a straight person deciding to become gay. it just does not compute in my brain.
|
As someone who is both a christian and a member of the Boy Scouts of America, I would like to present my thoughts (and the thoughts of many in the group).
Before talking about this I will say that I very strongly support acceptance of people regardless of sexuality, but that the negative disposition in the BSA has some merit, even though its origins are not directly related to homosexuality.
A lot of this "homophobia" stuff comes from the boy scout policy of two deep leadership(look it up). That is to say, there cannot be just one boy and one adult with each other at any time. The reason for having this rule is the same reason there exists such rules as a female taking a driver's test may not go alone with a male instructor. There exists some men out there who possess not-so nice intentions (rape among them) and the BSA imposed this rule to shield their young members (those under 18 years of age) away from someone with such intentions, because lets face it, the boy scouts seems like the place to go if you are a homosexual pedophile.
Boy scouts number one concern is safety. I go on a lot of trips and participate in a lot of activities that I would not have been able to do had it not been for BSA, and the numerous BSA safety regulations is what allows large groups of boys to go out and participate in such fun activities without anyone getting separated or into danger. The two deep leadership policy is an obvious attack against homosexuals, but only because homosexual men WITH MALICIOUS INTENT (I'm talking about legit criminal rape) are a common danger to the safety of the BSA and its members.
I wish the boy scouts of america hadn't become so opposed to homosexuality, but one thing leads to another eventually and the two deep leadership practice has instilled such a mindset within it (a mindset that, knowing the origins, I understand, but oppose strongly)
As a christian, I know the bible says homosexuality is wrong and god doesn't like it. I also know that god doesn't like it when we use his name in vain or make an idol or disrespect our parents or break any of god's commandments (which, according to my faith and those educated in common christian beliefs, human beings do all the time). I believe that anyone who treats homosexuality as the greatest affront to god's kingdom and word are missing out a huge part of the bible. They go on to say homosexuals are sinners while neglecting their own sin (the latter part being a one-way ticket to hell, according to the christian beliefs)
I would say that Churches committing crimes against homosexuals is entirely unjust and despicable, and the fact that the BSA denied a minor (as in, the very thing the two deep leadership was supposed to be protecting, not protecting against) his eagle award to be entirely against the fundamentals of scouting (exploring the world and yourself to help you make decisions in your adult life).
I am very willing to talk to anyone about scouting or Christianity if they are willing to debate thoughtfully. I don't want to be in here converting anyone, I just want people to understand the origins of these feelings in the Boys Scouts of America and understand that it is not christianity's fault that christians are mistreating homosexuals or being ignorant to the many facets of our world. I understand that this is the internet and I can't have my way with everyone, but I implore that you don't go about judging these groups based on the actions of a few members.
|
On October 11 2012 11:19 Shin_Gouki wrote:Show nested quote +On October 11 2012 07:48 Klondikebar wrote:On October 11 2012 05:27 dAPhREAk wrote:On October 11 2012 05:24 shizaep wrote:On October 11 2012 05:23 Olinim wrote:On October 11 2012 05:18 shizaep wrote:On October 11 2012 05:06 Olinim wrote:On October 11 2012 05:02 shizaep wrote:On October 10 2012 13:20 dAPhREAk wrote:On October 10 2012 13:18 Djzapz wrote: [quote] I used to think like that, but in retrospect, people don't necessarily stand up for minorities and we can't trust them to do it. Not every time. i have a problem with the trend of people/government deciding how other people should think, or what they should believe. You say it's okay for people to stick for their views but right after you go on to say that it's okay for people to "boycott" or "punish" them for sharing these views, implying that it is, in fact, not okay to uphold these views. If you thought it was okay for the BSA to uphold their views, you would let them be and not go on forums to criticize their beliefs because they are not like yours, which are obviously "correct". He probably means it's okay in the sense that they have a legal right to do that. Not that he won't criticize their backwards beliefs or boycott them because of it, just that he wouldn't try to pass a law about it or force them to change. Yes, if you think that these beliefs are "backwards", by all means go ahead, I commend you for sticking up for them. The BSA thinks that your beliefs are backwards and they can stand up for them too. I believe that if they want to, they can. Just because you share a belief about how society should function, doesn't necessarily mean it should function that way. Live your own life and let the BSA live theirs. Don't hate them for it and don't "boycott" them. Just disagree with them and leave them alone. Why? Part of sticking up for my beliefs is not supporting (boycotting) people that discriminate against gays. Don't tell me who I should or shouldn't hate. If you hate people who aren't pro-homosexuality, then by the same logic, people who aren't pro-homosexuality have every right to do the same to you. agreed wholeheartedly. I do not understand why we let such horrible logic slip by. Being Christian is a choice. Being gay is not a choice. Your choices can be criticized and ridiculed. Things that are not your choice cannot. If you choose to believe that 2+2 = 6 then I can call you stupid and laugh at you. I cannot laugh at someone for being born black or blonde. Wait, I have a question. Can you link me to a good study where it deems homosexuality isn't a choice? I've read many different studies which contradict each other. Yes, Christianity, as well as any religion is a choice. However, in my mind, I believe your gender orientation is also a choice. There isn't a gene that makes you like one sex over the other from my understanding.
Ask a gay person...why do you need a study? Or, just think about yourself. Was your orientation a choice? If not, why would you assume someone else's is?
|
On October 11 2012 08:16 Voltaire wrote: Hopefully sexual orientation will be added to the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Then the BSA won't be allowed to continue this nonsense anymore. The problem with the Constitution and the Civil rights argument is that sexual orientation is implicitly embedded in those rights. The problem comes when narrow-minded people want to push a backward homophobic agenda on the issue.
|
Does the bsa actually get federal funding, I took part in this argument in the last thread, and i think it was found that they do get a "favored group" type deal, I don't think I saw actual proof of government funding. The troop I was in as a scout (which ignored these types of rules with a great deal of pleasure) got all of our funding from selling that freaking popcorn and other fund raisers, and that and donations is where my regional district got its funding from as well.
That being said, all three of the eagle scouts my troop produced have sent in their eagle badges, and I agree with them fully. Unless BSA is getting federal funding they have no reason to allow atheists and gays into the scouts (which huge numbers of troop and even some districts and counsels ignore) and gaining eagle rank (which the national council controls and local units can't change no matter how they want to), but the younger scouts and leaders are not all accordance with the policy of bigotry that the national leaders enforce. The local leaders in my area so blatantly ignored these rules, that I must admit to not having known about these rules until it hit the national media. Just wanted to let you guys know that not all scouts and former scouts share the prejudiced the national counsel in Texas enforce.
|
On October 11 2012 11:50 Jaaaaasper wrote: Does the bsa actually get federal funding, I took part in this argument in the last thread, and i think it was found that they do get a "favored group" type deal, I don't think I saw actual proof of government funding. The troop I was in as a scout (which ignored these types of rules with a great deal of pleasure) got all of our funding from selling that freaking popcorn and other fund raisers, and that and donations is where my regional district got its funding from as well.
That being said, all three of the eagle scouts my troop produced have sent in their eagle badges, and I agree with them fully. Unless BSA is getting federal funding they have no reason to allow atheists and gays into the scouts (which huge numbers of troop and even some districts and counsels ignore) and gaining eagle rank (which the national council controls and local units can't change no matter how they want to), but the younger scouts and leaders are not all accordance with the policy of bigotry that the national leaders enforce. The local leaders in my area so blatantly ignored these rules, that I must admit to not having known about these rules until it hit the national media. Just wanted to let you guys know that not all scouts and former scouts share the prejudiced the national counsel in Texas enforce.
Yes sir, BSA's funding comes from private donations and fundraisers.
|
|
|
|