|
AFAIK it is the TSA/Homeland Security party to blame in this case.
And Brits aren't alone in their belief about how unnecessary those two departments are. Most Americans detest the TSA and would also like to see them gone.
The story is about how incompetent the TSA is, but it fails to say how we Americans also hate the TSA.
|
On February 01 2012 03:49 Crisium wrote:Show nested quote +On February 01 2012 03:46 FabledIntegral wrote: Destroy as a slang for party? As in, "everyone there was destroyed"? If so, that's not even British slang, but used in Southern California all the time... But they didn't' say "I'm gonna go get destroyed in America" they said "destroy America". It just seems off. I know they meant the slang, obviously, but why phrase it that way? A comment in the news article said it best: The thing is they in most likelihood would not be subjected to delights of British prisons and with high probability would not even be sent back. Of all the encounters with different immigration and security agents everyone has the worst experience in US. It is not a coincidence. US agents just have no common sense whatsoever. Following up on a possible threat is nothing wrong and ok, interrogation is ok. Not realizing what is actually going on is a sign of terminal stupidity and being drunk on power that the petty beaurocrats love so much.
|
This is just how governments in general operate. Besides, you can't hear inflection on the internet. Anyways, we've been on a tear as of late, busting bomb plots and such left and right. If this is part of their (profoundly successful) tactic, then so be it.
|
On February 01 2012 03:54 AeroGear wrote:Show nested quote +On February 01 2012 03:42 oBlade wrote:On February 01 2012 03:39 AeroGear wrote: Lesson learned? Maybe people will start to think and filter what they say and publish on social medias. I cant blame either party, policies and threat assessments have to be objective and strict. Their tweet altough harmless (yet provocative) raised a red flag and they got punished for it.
Way too many derails in this thread (and every other lately..) I'd never put you in a cell with two cocaine smugglers for posting a Family Guy quote on Twitter. Thing is, I dont do/say/talk about these things unless to friends or relatives. Am really not a facebook/twitter user except to keep in touch with friends or follow specific companies or finance related news. Not everyone will interpret it as harmless, all it takes is 1 person to ruin your day. Some agents are nice and friendly, others are very strict. Given what has happened in the past years, knowing the escalated security protocols at airports, train stations and all, it really shows lack of judgement to say these things "out loud". The last thing I want to do when I'm at an airport is draw attention or be uncooperative, I know the possible consequences. Your example is a bit extreme btw, but even being held for a few hours at an airport could be a major hindrance to a vacation or business trip. While I can ultimatly agree that the response from authorities was perhaps excessive, it is known that they are very cautious since the events that happened in many parts of the world. Then note that we are not criticizing them for following up on a possible threat, but on their reaction to the uncovered facts. Looking for shovels that will be used to dig up a corpse, really ?
|
On February 01 2012 04:14 AutomatonOmega wrote:Show nested quote +On February 01 2012 04:09 Crisium wrote:On February 01 2012 03:56 KryptoStorm wrote:On February 01 2012 03:53 r.Evo wrote:On February 01 2012 03:46 AndyGB4 wrote:On February 01 2012 03:25 r.Evo wrote:On February 01 2012 03:12 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:On February 01 2012 03:04 Mordanis wrote:For all of the people who are not educated about America's relation with terrorism, I'd like you to read this post and then think about the tweet about "destroying America" First off, many people in this thread seem to be assuming that every terrorist will be an Arabian Muslim with a big beard. America has only had one experience with terrorism performed by this "group", and countless from other types of people. Look at the Oklahoma City Bombing for instance. It was done by an American who used to be in our military. Also look at Jared Laughner, who killed six people including a federal judge and injured several more including US Representative Gabrielle Giffords. He was born and raised in America, and he just happened to be insane. There is no reason why Bryan should have been given a free pass because of his ethnicity or country of origin. Another complaint I've been hearing is that no real terrorist would announce his plans ahead of time on the internet. Just a few weeks ago there was a case where a couple in Arizona released Youtube videos of their plans to lure police (and SWAT teams) into their home and then detonate a bomb to kill them. The couple named individual officers in the video and described exactly what they planned to happen. Jared Laughner, who killed several people and injured many more, also released a video in which he burned a flag and "warned" Giffords. There are precedents of people doing this type of thing, and therefore the Homeland Security agents had every right (and mandate) to detain and probably deport this guy based on what he wrote. The only discussion I can really see with this issue is whether they should have detained him while checking to see if he really had any plans to harm anyone or let him go back home immediately. Also I think it is totally reasonable for security agents in this line of work to not use their sense of humor when the lives of hundreds of people could be on the line. Voice of reason. Great explanations. Thank you for this. No it's not. He's talking about threats from within the country while the topic is about threats from the outside. If someone wants some form of attention he's more likely to blow up stuff close to his home, if someone wants to spread terror at a certain place... he's more likely to travel there. Homeland security assumed a foreign threat targetting american soil based on a twitter message. ... And, therefore the original argument is still valid: No real terrorist who wants to actually accomplish spreading terror would announce his plans ahead of time. None of the cases mentioned above has got anything to do with foreign terrorists posting announcements about their planned deed on twitter.How the fuck can you even compare a video of a couple ANNOUNCING NAMES and DESCRIBING WHAT THEY WANT TO DO to someone posting what the british couple did? The examples he listed were just to show you that these things are possible. Just because he doesn't have an example from someone foreign doesn't mean it can't happen. There's a first time for everything, why take the risk if they seem even slightly suspicious? That's their job. Do you think if someone was the first person to ever post a video on YouTube saying how they'll go shoot down a school that the police would be like : "Oh, no one is that stupid to post it on Youtube, it's never happened before! So silly!" No, they'd obviously wouldn't just let that slip. Anyways, what I'm saying is that it's their job to keep their country safe from ANYTHING that can harm them. Just because no one has posted on twitter some terrorist plan, it doesn't mean it will never happen. I'm requoting this paragraph again so more people can see it. I agree strongly with what it says. Every single thing any single person can say is "slightly suspicious". If I have my hands in my pockets and walk into a store I could have a hand granade in there. If I post on twitter that "IF I FAIL THAT TEST TOMORROW IM GONNA !%&$" then it might mean that I'll kill someone or it might mean that I'll be pissed as fuck. If I don't post it, both is still possible to happen. There has to be a point where someone who's job is to keep a country safe applies common sense. If he doesn't then everyone has to be under surveillance 24/7 because everything can be seen as suspicious without common sense. Well that's the land of the free for you. They shoot people with crowbars, kids murder kids and get let off because it's 'self defense', and they imprison you for life if you have a few pictures of underage kids on your computer. Oh man, here we go. Let's base our view of a country from selective news stories on a Starcraft forum. Who cares if the country has 310 million individuals and all kinds of stuff happens and doesn't happen, let's be biased and not realize it! Please, don't start sewing anti-American bullshit. It demeans you, and spirals the thread downward. I think a lot of this is because many Europeans can't really grasp a country the size of USA, Canada, or China. They don't understand that every state is like one of their countries and no single one entity or even the government of a country can claim to speak for everyone. They're used to compact countries with just a few million people each, many of whom are very homogeneously populated, unlike USA. You have very skewed view of European mindset and of the facts also.
|
On February 01 2012 04:47 RetroAspect wrote:Show nested quote +On February 01 2012 04:29 DreamChaser wrote: I dunno i don't say im going to England and say " I will destroy England" or I will dig up "Queen Elizabeth!" it seems stupid to be detained but why would they even bother posting something like that on twitter or FB a few days before? In my opinion, this and many other "why did they post it" and "what if" arguments are as useless as nipples on a breastplate(see what i did there!) . It is besides the point. The point is the absurdism, paranoia and utter arrogance of the US customs in this case(and many, many others like this) What is even more absurd, etc.. are the americans here defending or minimizing the issue, just because they feel personally attacked by all the negative criticisms. Just think about this: How would you react to such news if you weren't from USA but say, an EU country? How would you perceive this news? I'm from EU and the only thing i feel is constantly under attack here is common sense.
They knew the context. They could have known -sorry- should have deducted the consequences. A serious risk management system leaves no unnecessary room for error, so all this cheap talk about context interpretation with the perspective of the system is irrelevant.
What US did was not only normal, but right and i wish my country (and the ones i'm travelling to) would follow the same procedures.
Funny thing is we're most likely arguing over nothing here, it's an article in daily freaking mail with the original us papers lacking a reliable source.
On February 01 2012 01:37 danielrosca wrote:Show nested quote +On February 01 2012 01:32 Zaragon wrote: The mistake is scary. What is more scary is that the security seems to work like a mindless machine. On the contrary, that's the best part about it. And the one you should be thankful for. Btw you could add this to OP http://thelede.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/01/30/travelers-say-they-were-denied-entry-to-u-s-for-twitter-jokes/?smid=tw-thelede&seid=autoHe was questioned under oath about his postings to Twitter, according to images of a document said to be from the agency. The document, posted by The Daily Mail and quoted by The Sun, appeared to demonstrate a less-than-full understanding of social media by agents explaining the reason for the questioning:
Mr. Bryan confirmed that he had posted on his Tweeter Web site account that he was coming to the United States to dig up the grave of Marilyn Monroe. Also on his tweeter account Mr. Bryan posted that he was coming to destroy America. The authenticity of the document could not be independently verified. It was photographed by Small World News Service, an independent British news agency that frequently pays its sources for stories. Mr. Bryan and Ms. Bunting posed together for portraits by the SWNS news agency that appeared in tabloids on Monday, including the Daily Mail and the Sun.
A call to Donald Triner, acting director of the agency office overseeing an initiative on “Publicly Available Social Media Monitoring and Situational Awareness,” was directed to the press office.
|
On February 01 2012 05:32 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:Show nested quote +On February 01 2012 05:28 semantics wrote:On February 01 2012 05:21 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:On February 01 2012 05:13 KimJongChill wrote: Welp, guess we can't joke about anything now. But at least we can still make sweeping generalizations. Acceptable: Why did the chicken cross the road? To get to the other side. Not acceptable: Why did the chicken cross the road? To go and destroy America, which is what I'm on my way to do right now! Learn the difference. Why did the chicken cross the road? To get to the other side. The other side meaning, the other side of life thus to die. He crossed the road to die, but how did he die? He went on a murdering spree on US soil only to be gunned down by SWAT, his point of attack was just on the other side of the road. I almost thought you were serious, but then I saw your name and realized you just like to play games Nothing reveals humanity so well as the games it plays —Hartley
|
Imagine this thread if those people actually killed someone while in the US after that tweet. "WTF gov. had this information and did nothing."
|
I could think of a lot of jokes that would insure my inability to travel in a transcontinental flight.
That's why I don't make those jokes.
I don't publicly post I'm going to destroy France before travelling there. And thus, I don't have problems.
Kind of silly in how you look at it, but really, what is a country supposed to do? We need to monitor for terrorists on our planes -- for very obvious reasons. It isn't up to our "agents'" personal discretion on whether someone is joking or using slang. If you raise the red-flag, you get a cavity search. Don't raise the red flag, don't "troll" a country, and you won't have problems.
|
On February 01 2012 05:53 Bosko wrote: Imagine this thread if those people actually killed someone while in the US after that tweet. "WTF gov. had this information and did nothing." That isn't "information." I'm just disappointed at the poor search/flag methods employed by the government when much more powerful and selective data mining technology exists.
|
Couldnt they just have checked out the rest of his twitter page of facebook'ed the guy or something first. I obviously cant say for sure but intuitively you would think that the information available from those sources would make clear the context of his statement and its true meaning.
Im all for people being careful about who they let into the country given whats happened in the past, but sometimes you just have to not go full retard mode.
|
Yeah! I wouldn't joke about destroying America if you are coming to the U.S. People hate us so much they run planes into our buildings. Next time use your damn common sense.
|
I've seen some statistics on how tourism declined all over the world after 9/11. But the industry recovered worldwide and now twice as many people spend their holidays abroad than in 2000. But in the US the increase was only about 10%.
Fact is for most of us travelling to the US isn't unavoidable. It would be very nice but probably not worth the hassle, when there are so many interesting alternatives.
|
Digging so far, my God. Would a terrorist even tweet his ideas on Twitter?
|
On February 01 2012 05:38 mcc wrote:Show nested quote +On February 01 2012 04:14 AutomatonOmega wrote:On February 01 2012 04:09 Crisium wrote:On February 01 2012 03:56 KryptoStorm wrote:On February 01 2012 03:53 r.Evo wrote:On February 01 2012 03:46 AndyGB4 wrote:On February 01 2012 03:25 r.Evo wrote:On February 01 2012 03:12 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:On February 01 2012 03:04 Mordanis wrote:For all of the people who are not educated about America's relation with terrorism, I'd like you to read this post and then think about the tweet about "destroying America" First off, many people in this thread seem to be assuming that every terrorist will be an Arabian Muslim with a big beard. America has only had one experience with terrorism performed by this "group", and countless from other types of people. Look at the Oklahoma City Bombing for instance. It was done by an American who used to be in our military. Also look at Jared Laughner, who killed six people including a federal judge and injured several more including US Representative Gabrielle Giffords. He was born and raised in America, and he just happened to be insane. There is no reason why Bryan should have been given a free pass because of his ethnicity or country of origin. Another complaint I've been hearing is that no real terrorist would announce his plans ahead of time on the internet. Just a few weeks ago there was a case where a couple in Arizona released Youtube videos of their plans to lure police (and SWAT teams) into their home and then detonate a bomb to kill them. The couple named individual officers in the video and described exactly what they planned to happen. Jared Laughner, who killed several people and injured many more, also released a video in which he burned a flag and "warned" Giffords. There are precedents of people doing this type of thing, and therefore the Homeland Security agents had every right (and mandate) to detain and probably deport this guy based on what he wrote. The only discussion I can really see with this issue is whether they should have detained him while checking to see if he really had any plans to harm anyone or let him go back home immediately. Also I think it is totally reasonable for security agents in this line of work to not use their sense of humor when the lives of hundreds of people could be on the line. Voice of reason. Great explanations. Thank you for this. No it's not. He's talking about threats from within the country while the topic is about threats from the outside. If someone wants some form of attention he's more likely to blow up stuff close to his home, if someone wants to spread terror at a certain place... he's more likely to travel there. Homeland security assumed a foreign threat targetting american soil based on a twitter message. ... And, therefore the original argument is still valid: No real terrorist who wants to actually accomplish spreading terror would announce his plans ahead of time. None of the cases mentioned above has got anything to do with foreign terrorists posting announcements about their planned deed on twitter.How the fuck can you even compare a video of a couple ANNOUNCING NAMES and DESCRIBING WHAT THEY WANT TO DO to someone posting what the british couple did? The examples he listed were just to show you that these things are possible. Just because he doesn't have an example from someone foreign doesn't mean it can't happen. There's a first time for everything, why take the risk if they seem even slightly suspicious? That's their job. Do you think if someone was the first person to ever post a video on YouTube saying how they'll go shoot down a school that the police would be like : "Oh, no one is that stupid to post it on Youtube, it's never happened before! So silly!" No, they'd obviously wouldn't just let that slip. Anyways, what I'm saying is that it's their job to keep their country safe from ANYTHING that can harm them. Just because no one has posted on twitter some terrorist plan, it doesn't mean it will never happen. I'm requoting this paragraph again so more people can see it. I agree strongly with what it says. Every single thing any single person can say is "slightly suspicious". If I have my hands in my pockets and walk into a store I could have a hand granade in there. If I post on twitter that "IF I FAIL THAT TEST TOMORROW IM GONNA !%&$" then it might mean that I'll kill someone or it might mean that I'll be pissed as fuck. If I don't post it, both is still possible to happen. There has to be a point where someone who's job is to keep a country safe applies common sense. If he doesn't then everyone has to be under surveillance 24/7 because everything can be seen as suspicious without common sense. Well that's the land of the free for you. They shoot people with crowbars, kids murder kids and get let off because it's 'self defense', and they imprison you for life if you have a few pictures of underage kids on your computer. Oh man, here we go. Let's base our view of a country from selective news stories on a Starcraft forum. Who cares if the country has 310 million individuals and all kinds of stuff happens and doesn't happen, let's be biased and not realize it! Please, don't start sewing anti-American bullshit. It demeans you, and spirals the thread downward. I think a lot of this is because many Europeans can't really grasp a country the size of USA, Canada, or China. They don't understand that every state is like one of their countries and no single one entity or even the government of a country can claim to speak for everyone. They're used to compact countries with just a few million people each, many of whom are very homogeneously populated, unlike USA. You have very skewed view of European mindset and of the facts also.
Point fingers more brah. Your posts so far in this thread hint at a blanket anti-American swing, without analyzing facts or allowing exceptions.
|
I have a better question: Who gives a shit? The news lately has been scraping up the bucket. They are getting whatever story they can get their hands on and blowing it out of proportion. It's just TWO people that were fucked, how does this even remotely trigger an effect to give a shit in regular, everyday people? If the couple has a problem with what happened then who even gives a crap. They are CITIZENS of the united states, the government can do w/e they want to them because this is, after all, not a free country.
|
once again proving that america is an insecure whining bitch. but we already knew that.
User was warned for this post
|
On February 01 2012 06:14 Torte de Lini wrote: Digging so far, my God. Would a terrorist even tweet his ideas on Twitter? Earlier in the thread I pointed out Jared Loughner, who made a Youtube video in which he burned a flag and said something along the lines of "Gabrielle Giffords has been warned", and he killed 6 and injured several more. There was also another case in Arizona where a couple made videos they released somewhere on the internet in which they outlined there plans to lure a SWAT team into their home and then blow everyone up, but I can't find the source for that (if anyone has the AZ Repbublic from a Sunday 2 weeks ago or a little more, it was in the Valley and State section...)
Also Anders Behring Breivik, the guy who killed people on the island in Norway, tweeted a vaguely ominous semi-threat: "One person with a belief is equal to the force of 100 000 who have only interests."
|
On February 01 2012 06:21 Blist wrote: once again proving that america is an insecure whining bitch. but we already knew that.
How did you come to such a generalized conclusion?
|
Lol, what are you trying to get at?
Do you think I'm trying to slaughter a bunch of people? No, I'm just saying this is a factor to the ultimate stereotype. And why such a offensive thing exists. I'm just trying to put out a point about whats furthering this stereotype and this is one of them. Hell, i'm stereotypical to my own country about the amount of "sheep and lamb" we have here, am I gonna go on a mass slaughter in my own country, no thats ridiculous unless you have a major mental condition lol.
*Thinks a little*
You still don't make any sense, I have no grudge against Americans at all. Why would I? They're the reason pretty much why I'm on the internet. I fucking love America for the stuff they've given.
I'm sorry if I offended anyone with my point somehow.
|
|
|
|