"Sexsomniac" cleared of rape charge - Page 9

On July 06 2011 02:36 Destro wrote:
I have a personal problem with how most western courts will deem something not guilty due to mental issues. Doing the crime is doing the crime. If he knew he had sexsomnia, not having her in the house would be the best course of action. If not rape, he is guilty of negligence causing bodily harm.

On July 05 2011 23:30 Detwiler wrote:
im sorry im just not buyin it. they said rape now im pretty sure that requires penetration which means hes has to get her clothes off then get in her. she obviously is going to fight and make a bunch of noise and in all this he doesnt wake up.wife dont wake up either? oh and he has no memory of it? im just calling bullshit on this. i will take the rapist for 1000 please.

On July 06 2011 02:27 Slago wrote:
I don't see a problem here, he never invited her in his bed, he suffers from an embarrassing disorder and probably doesn't make it public, and she was victim to sex against her will, and he did it unconsciously like he has before.

please do not demonize the man, who was looking after this girl and an unfortunate set of circumstances led to this, the real problem is if the person who sent her in their knows of his condition cause than maybe they could face some sort of minor charges

On July 06 2011 02:39 Liquid`Jinro wrote:

OK, you dont know shit about sleep walking apparently.

At MLG Dallas, I got up, bitchslapped hot_bid and went back to bed.

Gon (one of the oGs coaches) told me he tried to wake me when I was sleep talking/nightmare/moving around etc once, and that didnt work. So he tried shaking me, that didnt work. So he tried slapping me, that didnt work.

He told me this as an apology and I laughed and was like "LOL, I remember 0 of this". You can still function when sleepwalking, you just arent actually aware of any of it.

On July 06 2011 02:36 Destro wrote:
I have a personal problem with how most western courts will deem something not guilty due to mental issues. Doing the crime is doing the crime. If he knew he had sexsomnia, not having her in the house would be the best course of action. If not rape, he is guilty of negligence causing bodily harm.

On July 06 2011 02:53 t3r.sAnkAri wrote:
You would think this would be something he'd have to tell people about. If not before atleast now.

On July 06 2011 02:58 oursblanc wrote:
Usually when you tell people that you've been known to have sex with your wife while still asleep they don't take it as a warning.

On July 06 2011 02:34 Gnial wrote:
One thing that no one seems to have considered is that he could have told her to sleep in his bed earlier in the day, but he was asleep when she decided to exercise that option. For instance, he could have said, "my room is cooler, if you would prefer to sleep there" with the intention of sleeping somewhere else should she choose to exercise that option. Perhaps she didn't realize her room was too hot until he was already asleep and didn't want to bug him.

On July 06 2011 03:10 DystopiaX wrote:
While I can buy the sleep sex argument, I think that he should have showed better judgement in sleeping next to a 16 year old girl if he knows he sleep sexes people (since he has done it to his wife/others in the past)...I'm sure he came up with an explanation I just can't imagine it.

On July 06 2011 03:15 nicebuffalo wrote:
this is like if somebody intends to kill somebody its murder, but if it was an accident its manslaughter. is there a word for accidental rape?