EPT8th grade Girls Attack/Strip 11-Year-Old Boy - Page 13
| Forum Index > General Forum |
|
Invoker
Belgium686 Posts
| ||
|
inimenesc
Estonia374 Posts
| ||
|
vetinari
Australia602 Posts
On June 05 2011 16:43 Bobble wrote: You watched Idiocracy, didn't you mate? Yes, there is some evidence that less intelligent people have more children than more intelligent people, but are you saying stupid people are all bullies? That's obviously not true. And besides, it doesn't matter how much progeny you have, evolution doesn't work that way. It's based on how much progeny pass their genes on to the next generation. People with higher intelligence generally have higher living conditions, so so they may have less children, but those children have a higher chance to survive than the progeny of less intelligent people. Also, you've assumed that less intelligent people will always have less intelligent kids. That is mostly true, due to socio-economic conditions, but there are plenty of exceptions. No, I have never watched Idiocracy, though I have heard of the movie. No, I'm not saying that stupid people are all bullies. I'm not an idiot. >.< I'm saying that bullies have traits that lead to an increased likelyhood of having more children than non-bullies. Well, it does matter how many children you have. In the western world, the difference in survival rates between rich and poor children to reproductive age (not including war) is essentially negligible. Hence, the raw birth rate in the demographic group is the most relevant factor. Besides, it doesn't matter how good your children are at surviving, if you and they reproduce at below replacement levels. (aka, university educated couples having only one child, for the good of the environment, or childless women in general. And voluntary childlessness is almost exclusively the domain of college educated women.) Of course there are exceptions. Keep in mind that intelligence is significantly genetic though (I'm pretty sure that this has been confirmed with identical twin studies, the gold standard in the nurture vs nature debates. (((Its both, of course))).) | ||
|
KimJongChill
United States6429 Posts
| ||
|
Chaosvuistje
Netherlands2581 Posts
On June 05 2011 14:46 vetinari wrote: 3 14 year old boys forcibly restrain and remove the clothes of an 11 year old girl, and they go on the sex offenders register. 3 14 year old girls forcibly restrain and remove the clothes of an 11 year old boy, and its a harmless prank that maybe got a little bit out of hand. This is so blatantly true. Damnit. When will these double standards get thrown out? -.- Either don't punish either sex or punish both equally. I thought feminism was all about equality for both genders, but I keep seeing that if females get a better treatment than guys do in simular situations, you won't hear them preaching for equality. It truely bothers me, cases like this. | ||
|
iCanada
Canada10660 Posts
On June 05 2011 17:01 KimJongChill wrote: Double standards....this would be so much worse if the genders were reversed, and for some reason, even I think it seems so much worse as well... Not even genders reversed. Three 14 year old guys and the 11 yearold guy, they are all screwed. Three 14 yearold girls, and an 11 yearold girl, they are screwed. | ||
|
LittleAtari
Jordan1090 Posts
this whole thing makes me so sick T_T I feel so bad for the boy. I really dont understand what the mother hopes to gain out of this. | ||
|
orn
Australia76 Posts
How is it a prank when the kid is crying and screaming and pleading? What the fuck? | ||
|
Anon06
United States203 Posts
| ||
|
Piski
Finland3461 Posts
On June 05 2011 16:24 Liquid`Jinro wrote: I agree with this (although if it happened to me personally I would have 100% sought personal revenge). One reason I find it hard to believe it's only playground antics is that they went so far as putting it on youtube but ok lets go with that. The real sad thing here is that he will never forget this, news, school mates and youtube will make sure of this. There is a real good chance that if he is now scarred for life he will just end up growing up to be a rapist/murderer. I know it's kinda far fetched but like Jinro said, if this would happen to me I would be so angry and wanting revenge but at the age of 11 I can't really get it so the kid will go through his school years thinking about. When he is old/strong enough we just might see him in news again, this time not in the victims seat. | ||
|
Jaso
United States2147 Posts
On June 05 2011 14:51 haduken wrote: The mother did the right thing. If she went ahead and press charges then her son would be the laughing stock of the school. Sad but true. I'm pretty sure he already is. :/ | ||
|
Raz0r
United States287 Posts
| ||
|
Maliris
Northern Ireland2557 Posts
| ||
|
jello_biafra
United Kingdom6632 Posts
| ||
|
Teton
France1656 Posts
| ||
|
d(O.o)a
Canada5066 Posts
On June 05 2011 17:21 Maliris wrote: This is ridiculous... females are more equal than males huh? That parent is an idiot for not pressing charges, if this was a 11 year old girl getting attacked like this they would go to prison Or at least juvenile detention centers, but those are about 95% males (made up statistic, but from what I've heard from friends who have been it's true.) | ||
|
VictorJones
United States235 Posts
| ||
|
Kyuki
Sweden1867 Posts
| ||
|
Teton
France1656 Posts
| ||
|
schmeebs
United States115 Posts
On June 05 2011 17:24 d(O.o)a wrote: Or at least juvenile detention centers, but those are about 95% males (made up statistic, but from what I've heard from friends who have been it's true.) Depends on where you are, but usually its somewhere around a 75/25 or an 80/20 split. Also, girls in juvie are fucking batshit crazy, a lot of the guys tend to be in for understandable things (assault/vandalism/robbery) where the girls are just fucking nuts. | ||
| ||
