|
I know this site requires at least 1024x768 to fit your screen and because we might make some layout changes in the future, i want to know your resolution.
Of course i can't add all the resolutions so pick the one closest to yours. If you don't know your resolution you can see it by going to your desktop, right click in some free space and choose properties. Btw if the site fits horizontal in your screen you got 1024x768, if you got white borders on both sides of the site in your browser you got a bigger resolution and if you have to scroll horizontal you have 800x600
p.s. don't expect changes soon, this is just to get an impression!
Poll: Whats your resolution
(Vote): 800x600 or less
(Vote): 1024x768
(Vote): 1280x 1024 or 960
(Vote): 1400x1050
(Vote): 1600x1200
(Vote): More than 1600x1200
(Vote): I dont know
|
oh i have first vote i am special 
|
|
|
1024x768 is the perfect resolution, 800x600 is too large and your desktop becomes too cluttered and anything greater than 1024x768 becomes difficult to see/click/read
|
On September 24 2004 09:55 SoMuchBetter wrote:
1024x768 is the perfect resolution, 800x600 is too large and your desktop becomes too cluttered and anything greater than 1024x768 becomes difficult to see/click/read
depends on the size of your monitor though, imo the good resolutions for each size are:
15" = 1024x768
17" = 1280x960 / 1400x1050
19" = 1400x1050 / 1600x1200
I like to have some space to work in
|
Mine is 1280x800 
I have a 15.4 inch widescreen and it works good for me
|
perfect resolution......... BS!
anyways.. 17" notebook display -> 1400x1050
|
Notta clue what mine is...
|
1280x 1024 @ 100hz
oh, 19" yea
|
On September 24 2004 10:11 FuZZ wrote:
Notta clue what mine is...
If you don't know your resolution you can see it by going to your desktop, right click in some free space and choose properties.
|
Osaka27174 Posts
I voted 1400x1050, but really it is 1440x900, 17" notebook
|
1024x768
It seems the most practical to me.
|
1152x864 is my favourite.
|
Netherlands13554 Posts
1280x1024
17" IIyama TFT :o
|
1280x1024 on this desktop, 1400x1050 on my laptop.
|
Fuck, misclick. Take one off 800x600, and make it 1024x768.
Meat, you're nuts. 15" monitor with 1024x768 is super tiny stuff. It'd be way too small.
|
i have a 15'' monitor and i cant use anything smaller than 800x600 cuz u cant see shit
btw sites that require u to use 1024x768 or greater suck
|
Origin, this site is made for 1024x768...
|
yeah it looks a bit weird with 1280 :D so much space at the sides
|
1024x768, but bigger at work which is where I spend most of my time on the site.
|
MaTRiX[SiN]
Sweden1282 Posts
i've got 800x600...i dont mind having the scroll thingies thougt...i dunno what size my monitor is but if i use a higher resolution it gets very tiny :p
|
btw, you can always use bigger fonts or desktop symbols
|
1024x768 in windows.
Or it's too big.
|
1280*960.
Btw, 1280*1024 is not a "standard" resolution, like 800*600, 1024*768 or 1280*960. The ratio is different.
|
i use 1280x1024, 21" monitor
|
You guys who chose 1280x1024; do you have widescreen? Considering its not proper 4:3.
|
On September 24 2004 11:03 SickofLife wrote:
Meat, you're nuts. 15" monitor with 1024x768 is super tiny stuff. It'd be way too small.
correct, im nuts.
But im surprised around 10% is using 800x600, how is it browsing TL ?
|
oh btw, im using 1400x1050 on a 15" screen, its a laptop screen so its a bit different, its 15" viewable and not 14" like normal monitors and quality is also different
|
Sweden33719 Posts
|
|
|
I have all my icons and fonts the same size as a person with a lower resolution would have. But, thanks to anti-aliased fonts and SVG icons (thx gnome), they can utilize the extra pixels to look smoother and generally nicer. The only thing that sometimes catches you is when people use absolute sizing on website fonts, rather than relative sizing - then you can have some quite small fonts. Most websites are starting to avoid this though, it seems.
|
On September 24 2004 10:44 Bizkit wrote:
1152x864 is my favourite.
mine too
|
I'm currently running 2560x1024, dual-screen setup. One 17" LCD and one 19" CRT, they are equal in size, actually.
|
51602 Posts
1280x1024 on a 19inch acer monitor =\ but the fx5200 doesnt support much further  .
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1152x864 at home
1024 x 728 at school :O
|
1024 with my 17", 1280 with the 19" at work
|
Russian Federation798 Posts
On September 24 2004 10:35 Manifesto7 wrote:
I voted 1400x1050, but really it is 1440x900, 17" notebook
same here
|
I have LG flatron T710PH, and I keep it at 1024x768@100Hz
|
On September 28 2004 02:28 GTR-2-Go_au wrote: 1280x1024 on a 19inch acer monitor =\ but the fx5200 doesnt support much further .
Are you sure? I have fx 5200 too, and I can put resolution up to 1600x1200 on 17". Do you have drivers for monitor?
|
1024x768 my video card wont accept more res 
|
1024x768 @ 85 Hz (Can go up to 120, but im ok with 85)
I use a 17" monitor
|
Germany / USA16648 Posts
1024x768 on my 17" CRT screen, will be 1280x1024 as soon as i get my 19" TFT panel
|
None of the above listed.
|
1600 x 1200, 19" flat screen (not LCD though).
|
I couldn't post a reply to the poll.... 1152x864 isn't there
|
1600x1200
It's not hard to read at all with a 19" monitor.
|
|
|
On September 28 2004 10:42 2t0nes wrote:
1280x1024@60mhz
15" Monitor
am i normal?! :O
60Hz screws up my eyes. Kinda depends on the monitor though, but you should rather use 1152*864@75 (your monitor should support it).
|
1024 with my FP 15" at house and the same res at work with a 17" CRT
|
Because of my cheap and crappy monitor I can only do 1024x768 at 85Hz, which just sucks.
|
1024, i cant believe that someone would use different resolution (well, different size of screen might do the trick)
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
