• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 11:03
CEST 17:03
KST 00:03
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL21] Ro16 Preview Pt2: All Star10Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - The Finalists16[ASL21] Ro16 Preview Pt1: Fresh Flow9[ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt2: News Flash10[ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt1: New Chaos0
Community News
2026 GSL Season 1 Qualifiers19Maestros of the Game 2 announced92026 GSL Tour plans announced15Weekly Cups (April 6-12): herO doubles, "Villains" prevail1MaNa leaves Team Liquid25
StarCraft 2
General
MaNa leaves Team Liquid Maestros of the Game 2 announced 2026 GSL Tour plans announced Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - The Finalists Blizzard Classic Cup @ BlizzCon 2026 - $100k prize pool
Tourneys
Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament 2026 GSL Season 1 Qualifiers INu's Battles#14 <BO.9 2Matches> GSL CK: More events planned pending crowdfunding RSL Revival: Season 5 - Qualifiers and Main Event
Strategy
Custom Maps
[D]RTS in all its shapes and glory <3 [A] Nemrods 1/4 players [M] (2) Frigid Storage
External Content
Mutation # 522 Flip My Base The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 521 Memorable Boss Mutation # 520 Moving Fees
Brood War
General
Leta's ASL S21 Ro.16 review FlaSh: This Will Be My Final ASL【ASL S21 Ro.16】 BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ ASL21 General Discussion BW General Discussion
Tourneys
[ASL21] Ro16 Group D [Megathread] Daily Proleagues Escore Tournament StarCraft Season 2 [ASL21] Ro16 Group C
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers What's the deal with APM & what's its true value Any training maps people recommend? Fighting Spirit mining rates
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Dawn of War IV Diablo IV Total Annihilation Server - TAForever Starcraft Tabletop Miniature Game
Dota 2
The Story of Wings Gaming
League of Legends
G2 just beat GenG in First stand
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas TL Mafia Community Thread Five o'clock TL Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread YouTube Thread
Fan Clubs
The IdrA Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books Movie Discussion!
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2026 Football Thread McBoner: A hockey love story
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Strange computer issues (software) [G] How to Block Livestream Ads
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Sexual Health Of Gamers
TrAiDoS
lurker extra damage testi…
StaticNine
Broowar part 2
qwaykee
Funny Nicknames
LUCKY_NOOB
Iranian anarchists: organize…
XenOsky
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1589 users

North Korea Fires Artillery Rounds at South Korean Island…

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 40 41 42 43 44 147 Next
CNugent
Profile Joined November 2010
Korea (South)15 Posts
November 23 2010 09:43 GMT
#821
On November 23 2010 18:39 Pyrrhuloxia wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 23 2010 18:38 CNugent wrote:
On November 23 2010 18:36 Z3kk wrote:
As someone who doesn't read the newsletter regularly and doesn't completely understand international relationships on a global scale, I'd like to ask: how serious exactly is this conflict?

I initially thought that this was exceedingly dangerous, but it won't, in all likelihood, develop into all-out warfare, right?



BBC says it is the most serious military provocation by NK since the Korean war in 1950.

Well lets not forget 46 people died in March when a SK ship was sunk and SK believes it was sunk by an NK torpedo.




It is much more serious than the incident in March. NK fired at the island and civilians are injured.
LunarC
Profile Blog Joined October 2009
United States1186 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-11-23 09:43:57
November 23 2010 09:43 GMT
#822
On November 23 2010 18:41 Benshin88 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 23 2010 18:38 VorcePA wrote:
On November 23 2010 18:35 MrHoon wrote:
I would really like to hear official statements from USA/China/Russia


Yeah, really waiting on US response which should happen in about 20-30 minutes. Although all I'm expecting is Obama to sternly point his finger at NK with furrowed eyebrows and something about wanting peace.

Despite the irritated overtone of that statement, it's SK's ultimate decision. It's their fight, and we're there (or at least we should be) to follow them.


I don't think war is going to happen. SK is a country that DOES NOT WANT WAR. NOBODY wants it. They want reunification but in a peaceful way. SK has worked hard to become a leader in the world economy. War would bring the country a decade or two back.

That's how World War 2 began. With nobody wanting war.

Fortunately, North Korea is not in a position to take on both the United States, as it is a direct ally to South Korea, nor is it in a position to expand towards China.

As for the tragedy itself, I hope my folks are doing all right over there :[
REEBUH!!!
Pyrrhuloxia
Profile Blog Joined May 2008
United States6700 Posts
November 23 2010 09:43 GMT
#823
On November 23 2010 18:41 FabledIntegral wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 23 2010 18:39 Pyrrhuloxia wrote:
On November 23 2010 18:38 CNugent wrote:
On November 23 2010 18:36 Z3kk wrote:
As someone who doesn't read the newsletter regularly and doesn't completely understand international relationships on a global scale, I'd like to ask: how serious exactly is this conflict?

I initially thought that this was exceedingly dangerous, but it won't, in all likelihood, develop into all-out warfare, right?



BBC says it is the most serious military provocation by NK since the Korean war in 1950.

Well lets not forget 46 people died in March when a SK ship was sunk and SK believes it was sunk by an NK torpedo.


Can you say it's a provocation when NK completely denies it though? Literally a question, not rhetorical. Can you..?

Yes, "provocation: something that causes indignation, anger, etc." (thefreedictionary.com) it certainly fits that particular definition.
Shigy
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States346 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-11-23 09:44:58
November 23 2010 09:44 GMT
#824
An agent group attempted to assassinate President Park in Janu- ary 1968. Seven North Koreans at- tempting to penetrate the southern boundary of the Demilitarized Zone in September 1968 were intercepted and killed, the largest number of casualties up to that time in any single incident in the Demilitarized Zone since the end of the war.5 Some 120 North Korean commando agents landed on the east coast of the Republic of Korea between 31 October and 2 November 1968,

Source: Military Affairs, Vol. 36, No. 3 (Oct., 1972), pp. 96-99

some other shit happened out there that was pretty serious, lots of people died in the late 60s, including some american pilots
Bshad
Profile Joined May 2008
120 Posts
November 23 2010 09:44 GMT
#825
On November 23 2010 18:38 FabledIntegral wrote:
Besides the retarded misquote on your part, if you refuse to acknowledge the difference you're either trolling or just blatantly stupid. There's a reason the US can go in somewhere with less manpower and come out with less casualties. US soldiers were insanely effective in comparison to Iraqi soldiers, who often didn't even have sufficient training because they didn't want to waste ammunition supplies. US soldiers are also better equipped, overall more prepared, more hardened, etc. Utter joke to even consider otherwise if you're comparing to something like NK.

Hey if only NK had such an awesome analyst like yourself maybe they wouldnt have attacked at all.
mustaju
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Estonia4504 Posts
November 23 2010 09:44 GMT
#826
On November 23 2010 18:40 dinmsab wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 23 2010 18:39 Pyrrhuloxia wrote:
On November 23 2010 18:38 CNugent wrote:
On November 23 2010 18:36 Z3kk wrote:
As someone who doesn't read the newsletter regularly and doesn't completely understand international relationships on a global scale, I'd like to ask: how serious exactly is this conflict?

I initially thought that this was exceedingly dangerous, but it won't, in all likelihood, develop into all-out warfare, right?



BBC says it is the most serious military provocation by NK since the Korean war in 1950.

Well lets not forget 46 people died in March when a SK ship was sunk and SK believes it was sunk by an NK torpedo.


Soldiers attacking soldiers is one thing but when you start attacking civilians that's just crossing a line...

Not to forget that civilian casualties could have been much higher. There are 1200 people living on that island.
WriterBrows somewhat high. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ndFysO2JunE
SecretUnexplorerUse
Profile Joined October 2010
13 Posts
November 23 2010 09:44 GMT
#827
Regarding statements andwhatnot, I just find it so weird that SVT -the swedish tv-chanels nor any other of the basic chanels make more talk about it at all. Other then basicly just reading up a message where someone sais he doesnt dare to make a coment on what he think will happend..
;Meanwhile any debate to find what so ever would be a discussion about teachers and school progress unrelated to the situation ofc.
Sitting and watching:
http://www.livestation.com/channels/3-al_jazeera_english
Anyone else in a simular situation, i sugest that link. Its to a news chanel
work hard think reward
Lunares
Profile Joined May 2010
United States909 Posts
November 23 2010 09:44 GMT
#828
On November 23 2010 18:42 Pika Chu wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 23 2010 18:38 FabledIntegral wrote:
On November 23 2010 18:34 Bshad wrote:
On November 23 2010 18:34 DystopiaX wrote:

Not comparing the qualities of soldiers seems even worse to me. To even suggest 1 NK soldier could compare to 1 US soldier is utterly ridiculous. Pure manpower means less in today's age than ever before.


Yeah totally, because US soldiers can fly and see through walls.


Besides the retarded misquote on your part, if you refuse to acknowledge the difference you're either trolling or just blatantly stupid. There's a reason the US can go in somewhere with less manpower and come out with less casualties. US soldiers were insanely effective in comparison to Iraqi soldiers, who often didn't even have sufficient training because they didn't want to waste ammunition supplies. US soldiers are also better equipped, overall more prepared, more hardened, etc. Utter joke to even consider otherwise if you're comparing to something like NK.


You don't seem to understand that the power of US soldiers don't come from individual training, it comes from logistics. They have better reckon, better communications, better organization. It's not like the soldiers are individually better.


It isn't so much that the logistics are better (which is true) but is that the US soldiers have more advanced equipment. Yes a lot of that is in the support and communication area, but things like our guns, the protection that our soldiers wear, UAV's and other robotics etc also provide the US soldiers quite an edge over NK soldiers.

however NK soldiers have also been an active warfront for 60 years so.
Pika Chu
Profile Blog Joined August 2005
Romania2510 Posts
November 23 2010 09:45 GMT
#829
On November 23 2010 18:43 TzaTzers wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 23 2010 18:42 Pika Chu wrote:
On November 23 2010 18:38 FabledIntegral wrote:
On November 23 2010 18:34 Bshad wrote:
On November 23 2010 18:34 DystopiaX wrote:

Not comparing the qualities of soldiers seems even worse to me. To even suggest 1 NK soldier could compare to 1 US soldier is utterly ridiculous. Pure manpower means less in today's age than ever before.


Yeah totally, because US soldiers can fly and see through walls.


Besides the retarded misquote on your part, if you refuse to acknowledge the difference you're either trolling or just blatantly stupid. There's a reason the US can go in somewhere with less manpower and come out with less casualties. US soldiers were insanely effective in comparison to Iraqi soldiers, who often didn't even have sufficient training because they didn't want to waste ammunition supplies. US soldiers are also better equipped, overall more prepared, more hardened, etc. Utter joke to even consider otherwise if you're comparing to something like NK.


You don't seem to understand that the power of US soldiers don't come from individual training, it comes from logistics. They have better reckon, better communications, better organization. It's not like the soldiers are individually better.


lol the individual IS better


Yep, every american soldier is a silvester stallone who alone manages to take on and kill 100 russian soldiers.
They first ignore you. After they laugh at you. Next they will fight you. In the end you will win.
zatic
Profile Blog Joined September 2007
Zurich15365 Posts
November 23 2010 09:45 GMT
#830
On November 23 2010 18:34 DystopiaX wrote:
Not comparing the qualities of soldiers seems even worse to me. To even suggest 1 NK soldier could compare to 1 US soldier is utterly ridiculous. Pure manpower means less in today's age than ever before.

This is right to an extend. However what does mean more today than ever before is willingness to take casualties. And it that most important regard NK certainly has the edge over any regular army on the planet.

What is still completely meaningless is comparing hardware in a situation like this. It's not like there is doubt that the US military is better equipped and trained. This had hardly any impact on the decisions on North's side though.
ModeratorI know Teamliquid is known as a massive building
lagmaster
Profile Blog Joined October 2009
United States374 Posts
November 23 2010 09:45 GMT
#831
The White House says it "strongly condemns" the North Korean attack on South Korea, adding it is firmly committed to the defence of South Korea, regional peace and stability, Reuters reports.
TzaTzers
Profile Joined April 2009
United States589 Posts
November 23 2010 09:47 GMT
#832
On November 23 2010 18:45 Pika Chu wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 23 2010 18:43 TzaTzers wrote:
On November 23 2010 18:42 Pika Chu wrote:
On November 23 2010 18:38 FabledIntegral wrote:
On November 23 2010 18:34 Bshad wrote:
On November 23 2010 18:34 DystopiaX wrote:

Not comparing the qualities of soldiers seems even worse to me. To even suggest 1 NK soldier could compare to 1 US soldier is utterly ridiculous. Pure manpower means less in today's age than ever before.


Yeah totally, because US soldiers can fly and see through walls.


Besides the retarded misquote on your part, if you refuse to acknowledge the difference you're either trolling or just blatantly stupid. There's a reason the US can go in somewhere with less manpower and come out with less casualties. US soldiers were insanely effective in comparison to Iraqi soldiers, who often didn't even have sufficient training because they didn't want to waste ammunition supplies. US soldiers are also better equipped, overall more prepared, more hardened, etc. Utter joke to even consider otherwise if you're comparing to something like NK.


You don't seem to understand that the power of US soldiers don't come from individual training, it comes from logistics. They have better reckon, better communications, better organization. It's not like the soldiers are individually better.


lol the individual IS better


Yep, every american soldier is a silvester stallone who alone manages to take on and kill 100 russian soldiers.


the U.S military does have better recon and communications and all that good technological stuff, but the individual soldier is also better than other soldiers because of these assets and they are just better overall, easy as that
"Why did the colossus fall over? because he was imbalanced..."
konadora *
Profile Blog Joined February 2009
Singapore66359 Posts
November 23 2010 09:47 GMT
#833
people being evacuated into bunkers
POGGERS
yandere991
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
Australia394 Posts
November 23 2010 09:48 GMT
#834
On November 23 2010 18:43 TzaTzers wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 23 2010 18:42 Pika Chu wrote:
On November 23 2010 18:38 FabledIntegral wrote:
On November 23 2010 18:34 Bshad wrote:
On November 23 2010 18:34 DystopiaX wrote:

Not comparing the qualities of soldiers seems even worse to me. To even suggest 1 NK soldier could compare to 1 US soldier is utterly ridiculous. Pure manpower means less in today's age than ever before.


Yeah totally, because US soldiers can fly and see through walls.


Besides the retarded misquote on your part, if you refuse to acknowledge the difference you're either trolling or just blatantly stupid. There's a reason the US can go in somewhere with less manpower and come out with less casualties. US soldiers were insanely effective in comparison to Iraqi soldiers, who often didn't even have sufficient training because they didn't want to waste ammunition supplies. US soldiers are also better equipped, overall more prepared, more hardened, etc. Utter joke to even consider otherwise if you're comparing to something like NK.


You don't seem to understand that the power of US soldiers don't come from individual training, it comes from logistics. They have better reckon, better communications, better organization. It's not like the soldiers are individually better.


lol the individual IS better


Thats a rather bold statement. When your fighting in another persons country all that goes out the door. Despite the supposed superiority Vietnam, the Middle Eastern wars, and the first Korean war did not show America winning (which didn't happen in 2/3 of the list) with ease. To all you people crying for war and thinking it's going to be similar to something of a steamroll please be realistic, the Koreans would have home ground advantage and that advantage is quite deadly.
Siffer
Profile Blog Joined August 2007
United States467 Posts
November 23 2010 09:48 GMT
#835
On November 23 2010 18:47 konadora wrote:
people being evacuated into bunkers


Just people on the island I hope?
FabledIntegral
Profile Blog Joined November 2008
United States9232 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-11-23 09:51:07
November 23 2010 09:49 GMT
#836
On November 23 2010 18:42 Irrelevant wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 23 2010 18:38 FabledIntegral wrote:
On November 23 2010 18:34 Bshad wrote:
On November 23 2010 18:34 DystopiaX wrote:

Not comparing the qualities of soldiers seems even worse to me. To even suggest 1 NK soldier could compare to 1 US soldier is utterly ridiculous. Pure manpower means less in today's age than ever before.


Yeah totally, because US soldiers can fly and see through walls.


Besides the retarded misquote on your part, if you refuse to acknowledge the difference you're either trolling or just blatantly stupid. There's a reason the US can go in somewhere with less manpower and come out with less casualties. US soldiers were insanely effective in comparison to Iraqi soldiers, who often didn't even have sufficient training because they didn't want to waste ammunition supplies. US soldiers are also better equipped, overall more prepared, more hardened, etc. Utter joke to even consider otherwise if you're comparing to something like NK.


Care to tell me what the Iraqi troop uniform looks like?

It's okay, I'll wait.


That's right because you haven't ever seen an iraqi soldier, because we aren't over there kill soldiers we're killing kids in bath robes, with flip flops and a farmer's hat.


Thanks for the 100% irrelevant comment when it comes to combat effectiveness. I wasn't attempting to debate our legitimacy in the region, merely the combat prowess.

On November 23 2010 18:42 Pika Chu wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 23 2010 18:38 FabledIntegral wrote:
On November 23 2010 18:34 Bshad wrote:
On November 23 2010 18:34 DystopiaX wrote:

Not comparing the qualities of soldiers seems even worse to me. To even suggest 1 NK soldier could compare to 1 US soldier is utterly ridiculous. Pure manpower means less in today's age than ever before.


Yeah totally, because US soldiers can fly and see through walls.


Besides the retarded misquote on your part, if you refuse to acknowledge the difference you're either trolling or just blatantly stupid. There's a reason the US can go in somewhere with less manpower and come out with less casualties. US soldiers were insanely effective in comparison to Iraqi soldiers, who often didn't even have sufficient training because they didn't want to waste ammunition supplies. US soldiers are also better equipped, overall more prepared, more hardened, etc. Utter joke to even consider otherwise if you're comparing to something like NK.


You don't seem to understand that the power of US soldiers don't come from individual training, it comes from logistics. They have better reckon, better communications, better organization. It's not like the soldiers are individually better.



No, they definitely are better. On an individual basis they could easily handle themselves better. I fail to see how organization wouldn't fall into having better soldiers either. However, the point I'm making is after the training this soldiers go through, they are then intrinsically better (not sure if I can actually use the word intrinsic since it's after the training, but you get the point).

On November 23 2010 18:48 yandere991 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 23 2010 18:43 TzaTzers wrote:
On November 23 2010 18:42 Pika Chu wrote:
On November 23 2010 18:38 FabledIntegral wrote:
On November 23 2010 18:34 Bshad wrote:
On November 23 2010 18:34 DystopiaX wrote:

Not comparing the qualities of soldiers seems even worse to me. To even suggest 1 NK soldier could compare to 1 US soldier is utterly ridiculous. Pure manpower means less in today's age than ever before.


Yeah totally, because US soldiers can fly and see through walls.


Besides the retarded misquote on your part, if you refuse to acknowledge the difference you're either trolling or just blatantly stupid. There's a reason the US can go in somewhere with less manpower and come out with less casualties. US soldiers were insanely effective in comparison to Iraqi soldiers, who often didn't even have sufficient training because they didn't want to waste ammunition supplies. US soldiers are also better equipped, overall more prepared, more hardened, etc. Utter joke to even consider otherwise if you're comparing to something like NK.


You don't seem to understand that the power of US soldiers don't come from individual training, it comes from logistics. They have better reckon, better communications, better organization. It's not like the soldiers are individually better.


lol the individual IS better


Thats a rather bold statement. When your fighting in another persons country all that goes out the door. Despite the supposed superiority Vietnam, the Middle Eastern wars, and the first Korean war did not show America winning (which didn't happen in 2/3 of the list) with ease. To all you people crying for war and thinking it's going to be similar to something of a steamroll please be realistic, the Koreans would have home ground advantage and that advantage is quite deadly.


We dominated the Vietcong in terms of combat effectiveness and kill-death-ratio (assuming that's an actual term and not just some video game term, although there are numbers to back that up). There's just a difference "when you're fighting for a cause you're willing to die for." So they just kept sprouting up and resisting. Doesn't mean our soldiers weren't literally kicking their asses. Which they were.
sym
Profile Joined November 2008
United States58 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-11-23 09:49:44
November 23 2010 09:49 GMT
#837
On November 23 2010 18:48 Siffer wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 23 2010 18:47 konadora wrote:
people being evacuated into bunkers


Just people on the island I hope?

i believe so

edit; watching the stream, that's what it seemed like
Sub40APM
Profile Joined August 2010
6336 Posts
November 23 2010 09:49 GMT
#838
In the 90s when Kim Il Sung was promoting Kim Jong Il they built up his cred with the party and the military for over 15 years by giving him progressively better positions within the government/army.
Today they are trying to fast track Kim Jong Ill's son into power so they have to do this hyper aggressive crap for domestic purposes, reminding everyone how dangerous everything can be and why the North has to unite behind the Kim family. And for foreign states its an important reminder that they have to keep giving NK rice and whatnot or else.
Moonling
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States987 Posts
November 23 2010 09:49 GMT
#839
On November 23 2010 18:35 Pyrrhuloxia wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 23 2010 18:33 Moonling wrote:
On November 23 2010 18:32 Shizuru~ wrote:
so i suppose that the situation have stabilised now?


No, South Korea has returned fire http://www.livestation.com/channels/3-al_jazeera_english

You are making things up. Al Jazeera is talking about Kabul now. Please stop.


I am not making things up would you like me to link the CNN article that stated this?

It was 1 hour ago exactly that they returned fire not "hours" i understand your trying to downplay the situation and i respect that somebody asked and i was just replying with information that i had read just like everyone else is doing - trying to figure whats going on
1% of koreans control 99% of starcraft winnings. #occupykorea.
Lefnui
Profile Joined November 2008
United States753 Posts
November 23 2010 09:49 GMT
#840
On November 23 2010 18:45 zatic wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 23 2010 18:34 DystopiaX wrote:
Not comparing the qualities of soldiers seems even worse to me. To even suggest 1 NK soldier could compare to 1 US soldier is utterly ridiculous. Pure manpower means less in today's age than ever before.

However what does mean more today than ever before is willingness to take casualties. And it that most important regard NK certainly has the edge over any regular army on the planet..

Absolutely no idea where you got that from.
Prev 1 40 41 42 43 44 147 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Ladder Legends
15:00
Valedictorian Cup #1
Solar vs GgMaChine
Bunny vs Cham
ByuN vs MaxPax
SteadfastSC10
Liquipedia
WardiTV Map Contest Tou…
11:00
Playoffs Day 4
Clem vs SHINLIVE!
MaxPax vs TBD
WardiTV1604
IntoTheiNu 998
TKL 577
Ryung 480
IndyStarCraft 339
Rex154
3DClanTV 125
EnkiAlexander 48
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
TKL 577
Ryung 480
IndyStarCraft 339
Rex 154
Railgan 125
SteadfastSC 10
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 41375
Calm 4317
Horang2 1616
EffOrt 1417
Mini 894
Light 463
firebathero 401
actioN 318
ggaemo 307
ZerO 233
[ Show more ]
Hyun 67
Sharp 65
Sea.KH 56
Shinee 46
Sexy 41
Killer 34
NotJumperer 33
HiyA 27
Shine 21
Rock 20
IntoTheRainbow 18
Terrorterran 18
Sacsri 16
Hm[arnc] 15
SilentControl 9
GoRush 8
Dota 2
Gorgc7397
qojqva839
BananaSlamJamma119
League of Legends
Reynor9
Counter-Strike
byalli1853
allub502
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King141
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor901
Liquid`Hasu354
Other Games
singsing2093
B2W.Neo1319
Beastyqt701
XBOCT267
XaKoH 145
QueenE117
RotterdaM95
KnowMe38
ZerO(Twitch)24
crisheroes4
Organizations
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Main Stream24269
StarCraft: Brood War
Kim Chul Min (afreeca) 11
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Adnapsc2 4
• intothetv
• IndyKCrew
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• sooper7s
• Migwel
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Kozan
StarCraft: Brood War
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 1367
League of Legends
• Nemesis2468
• Jankos2086
Other Games
• WagamamaTV181
Upcoming Events
BSL
3h 57m
CranKy Ducklings
8h 57m
Replay Cast
17h 57m
Wardi Open
18h 57m
Afreeca Starleague
18h 57m
Soma vs hero
Monday Night Weeklies
1d
Replay Cast
1d 8h
Replay Cast
1d 17h
Afreeca Starleague
1d 18h
Leta vs YSC
Replay Cast
3 days
[ Show More ]
The PondCast
3 days
KCM Race Survival
3 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Escore
4 days
Replay Cast
5 days
Replay Cast
5 days
IPSL
6 days
Ret vs Art_Of_Turtle
Radley vs TBD
BSL
6 days
Replay Cast
6 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Escore Tournament S2: W4
RSL Revival: Season 4
NationLESS Cup

Ongoing

BSL Season 22
ASL Season 21
CSL 2026 SPRING (S20)
IPSL Spring 2026
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 2
StarCraft2 Community Team League 2026 Spring
WardiTV TLMC #16
Nations Cup 2026
IEM Rio 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League S23 Finals
ESL Pro League S23 Stage 1&2
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S2: W5
Acropolis #4
BSL 22 Non-Korean Championship
CSLAN 4
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
HSC XXIX
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
Maestros of the Game 2
2026 GSL S2
RSL Revival: Season 5
2026 GSL S1
XSE Pro League 2026
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.