North Korea Fires Artillery Rounds at South Korean Island…
Forum Index > General Forum |
Railxp
Hong Kong1313 Posts
| ||
BasilPesto
Australia624 Posts
| ||
Nikon
Bulgaria5710 Posts
On November 23 2010 18:52 konadora wrote: showing street camera footage of shells hitting the streets Holy shit, I hope no one got hit in the footage they showed. | ||
hacklebeast
United States5090 Posts
On November 23 2010 18:54 konadora wrote: 2 dead, 5 critically injured, 10 injured BBC said 16 earlier, are you saying 10 total or 17 total injured? edit, 20 as of 5 min ago | ||
EtherealDeath
United States8366 Posts
| ||
CNugent
Korea (South)15 Posts
| ||
Benshin88
United States183 Posts
On November 23 2010 18:52 kwkwookw wrote: Yes seriously....sheesh you'd think this thread was run by immature children This pretty big event in the S. Korea. The people are probably emotional like something along time lines of 9/11. NK has NEVER NEVER attacked on SK soil especially using artillary shells. this is the first time in ~60years. It's usually random bullets firing across the border or small skirmishes near the water borders. SK citizens live in society without worrying about war or anything like that. They think about what am i going to eat. How am i going to get laid. What game am i going to play. etc This event has kind of stirred the idea of war back into there head. | ||
![]()
zatic
Zurich15313 Posts
On November 23 2010 18:54 Spidinko wrote: Doesn't this qualify as flamebating? This thread is derailiing into US army vs X army discussion. Agreed. And it stops here please. | ||
konadora
![]()
Singapore66071 Posts
On November 23 2010 18:55 hacklebeast wrote: BBC said 16 earlier, are you saying 10 total or 17 total injured? total 17 | ||
konadora
![]()
Singapore66071 Posts
http://tv.zeroboy.net/konadora/ | ||
Refreshe
United States141 Posts
| ||
![]()
zatic
Zurich15313 Posts
On November 23 2010 18:55 Benshin88 wrote: This pretty big event in the S. Korea. The people are probably emotional like something along time lines of 9/11. NK has NEVER NEVER attacked on SK soil. this is the first time in ~60years. Take a trip to Wikipedia please. This shit happens all the time. Not so much recently, true, but you certainly don't have to go back to the Korean war. | ||
![]()
DarthXX
Australia998 Posts
On November 23 2010 18:54 LunarC wrote: I'm pretty sure Nazi Germany was a largely brainwashed country led by the upper echelon of the national party too. The difference is that Germany had assets and the ability to muster an army and it had good geographic positioning to launch attacks across Europe. North Korea doesn't have the same assets and they certainly have no way to expand geographically. The difference being that the Nazi Party came to power in 1933 and war broke out 1939, thats 6 years, NK Governement has been in power almost 60 yrs now. | ||
rally_point
Canada458 Posts
I really hope this gets resolved peacefully :S | ||
Pyrrhuloxia
United States6700 Posts
On November 23 2010 18:55 CNugent wrote: The actions the SK government can take are limited. There is only one realistic action they might take and it is taking it to the UN and NK will be sanctioned to hel by the US and its alliesl. ? NK doesn't trade with any country other than China as far as I know and China is even limited in what they send (although reports emerged just yesterday, I think, that people in China have been illegally helping NK with centrifuges, illegally meaning people in China going against the Chinese government wishes). | ||
LunarC
United States1186 Posts
On November 23 2010 18:50 Hinanawi wrote: Would you stop blabbering about how invincible and movie-star Ramboish U.S. soldiers apparently are? There's a serious news story here and I'm facepalming pretty hard at this whole debate over "hurrr which country's soldiers are the most badass?" This post sums up my impression of this thread. Instead of discussing potential diplomatic repercussions and being genuinely concerned about this serious matter, let's all compare our respective military strengths /sarcasm | ||
konadora
![]()
Singapore66071 Posts
island was 17km away | ||
Raelcun
United States3747 Posts
On November 23 2010 18:59 konadora wrote: seems like there are cannons always ready-to-fire at S.Korea which can fire up to 27km away island was 17km away I would be surprised if there were not given how these things have played out in the past. | ||
dapierow
Serbia1316 Posts
On November 23 2010 18:57 Refreshe wrote: How can you even compare Nazi and North Korea in terms of power. The Nazis were arguably the worlds strongest economic and military power at the time. Yeah but Nukes change everything, and NK has them they can kill more civilians in a day than the nazi's did during the whole war | ||
Pyrrhuloxia
United States6700 Posts
On November 23 2010 18:59 konadora wrote: seems like there are cannons always ready-to-fire at S.Korea which can fire up to 27km away island was 17km away This is true, I know NK always has enough artillery aimed at Seoul to really destory it (supposedly anyway) and this has been true at least since 2001 when I first researched this. | ||
| ||