EPTNorth Korea Fires Artillery Rounds at South Korean Island…
| Forum Index > General Forum |
|
inFeZa
Australia556 Posts
| ||
infinitestory
United States4053 Posts
http://news.sina.com.cn/w/2010-11-23/155021519833.shtml | ||
|
DystopiaX
United States16236 Posts
On November 23 2010 18:32 Irrelevant wrote: We're already in the middle of the Greatest Depression without an end in sight lol not really...much higher rates of unemployment and weaker dollar in the Great depression. Look at how much shit we still consume and it's clear that it's nowhere near that bad, and that we could enter this war if necessary. won't even end up being that expensive if China doesn't get involved and it's NK vs the world. | ||
|
Lemonwalrus
United States5465 Posts
On November 23 2010 18:33 Moonling wrote: No, South Korea has returned fire http://www.livestation.com/channels/3-al_jazeera_english That happened literally hours ago. | ||
|
Bshad
120 Posts
On November 23 2010 18:34 DystopiaX wrote: Not comparing the qualities of soldiers seems even worse to me. To even suggest 1 NK soldier could compare to 1 US soldier is utterly ridiculous. Pure manpower means less in today's age than ever before. Yeah totally, because US soldiers can fly and see through walls. | ||
|
dinmsab
Malaysia2246 Posts
On November 23 2010 18:33 Moonling wrote: No, South Korea has returned fire http://www.livestation.com/channels/3-al_jazeera_english This was hours ago after the initial NK artillery fire, action has stopped and both sides have done nothing to follow up. I think it's pretty stabilised right now, atleast lets hope so. | ||
|
Pyrrhuloxia
United States6700 Posts
On November 23 2010 18:33 Moonling wrote: No, South Korea has returned fire http://www.livestation.com/channels/3-al_jazeera_english You are making things up. Al Jazeera is talking about Kabul now. Please stop. | ||
|
CNugent
Korea (South)15 Posts
| ||
|
MadVillain
United States402 Posts
Hope you don't take that stuff seriously. I mean isn't this supposed to be a serious thread about stuff actually happening? | ||
|
echobong
Canada92 Posts
| ||
|
Defeat
United States476 Posts
| ||
|
FabledIntegral
United States9232 Posts
On November 23 2010 18:34 inFeZa wrote: Why is NK still on the map? Because of their ability to retaliate and potentially murder millions, not to mention the casualties that would also occur on the NK side... | ||
|
SgtMuffins
United States37 Posts
On November 23 2010 18:34 inFeZa wrote: Why is NK still on the map? A combination of Chinese protectionism (first because they didn't want a US ally on their border, and more recently because they're afraid of the refugees a war would bring) and nukes. | ||
MrHoon
10183 Posts
 | ||
|
Z3kk
4099 Posts
I initially thought that this was exceedingly dangerous, but it won't, in all likelihood, develop into all-out warfare, right? | ||
|
Pyrrhuloxia
United States6700 Posts
| ||
|
infinitestory
United States4053 Posts
On November 23 2010 18:35 MrHoon wrote: I would really like to hear official statements from USA/China/Russia China: We're looking into the facts, but we want to make sure the Koreas cooperate to resolve the issue peaceably Russia: The Korean nations must keep calm; stopping escalation of the tensions is a top priority USA statement will be released within the hour | ||
|
Pika Chu
Romania2510 Posts
On November 23 2010 18:33 FabledIntegral wrote: Not comparing the qualities of soldiers seems even worse to me. To even suggest 1 NK soldier could compare to 1 US soldier is utterly ridiculous. Pure manpower means less in today's age than ever before. No it doesn't. For example try guerilla fights or fights in the mountains, it isn't the same type of training they are given to have an advantage in these areas. Any news of China's leaders meeting to discuss this? | ||
|
infringement153
United States30 Posts
| ||
|
Comeh
United States18919 Posts
On November 23 2010 18:35 MrHoon wrote: I would really like to hear official statements from USA/China/Russia i'm fairly certain China has already put out an official statement something along the lines of "We hope the situation stabilizes", or something to that extent. I think it was posted (somewhere) earlier in the thread. Edit: beaten to it. | ||
| ||
