EPTOn April 29 2010 14:43 I_Love_Bacon wrote:
That is one of the most accidental dirty things I've ever read...
That is one of the most accidental dirty things I've ever read...
What about that was accidental?
Porn Star Rescues Man From Jail Sentence in Puerto - Page 3
| Forum Index > General Forum |
|
Pyrrhuloxia
United States6700 Posts
What about that was accidental? | ||
|
I_Love_Bacon
United States5765 Posts
Often times I'd suggest that it was intended as humor, but the specific word choices lead me in the other direction that it was merely an attempt at an assertion of facts. I can't make a real claim one way or the other since I don't think anybody would be like, "hai guyz i likez da child pr0nz." So instead, I merely injected humor into the situation through the observation that it was closer to a Freudian slip. | ||
|
PH
United States6173 Posts
On April 29 2010 13:45 FyRe_DragOn wrote: LOL also she doesnt look childish at all in the news link, you would think that to be mistaken for a 13year old she would be pretty flat but no.. Look up her videos. | ||
|
DminusTerran
Canada1337 Posts
| ||
|
Pika Chu
Romania2510 Posts
On April 29 2010 15:57 DminusTerran wrote: What motivates someone to become a court approved expert on child pornography? Personally my fetish is to write ridiculous Starcraft erotica and masturbate furiously to it. I wonder if there is a future in that as well? The motive is they can watch children porn all day long to satisfy their inner pedo without getting in prison for it. Anyway, this world is getting more and more retarded. Sun tanned women in Teheran will go to prison, a guy in puerto rico does jail because the juridical system works just like a big joke, and a woman in nevada gets life imprisonment because a 13y touched her boobs. Next, when they invent a mind reading machine, they will put half of the world in jail because they are fantasizing of rapes and sweet 15y virgins. | ||
|
Craton
United States17246 Posts
The prosecution refused to subpoena the records from Fuentes' studio or even allow a copy of Fuentes' ID into evidence. I wonder if the guy can bring that up in some kind of civil or ethics suit, e.g. w/ the BAR association. Seems like a breach of ethics. | ||
|
Etherone
United States1898 Posts
| ||
CaucasianAsian
Korea (South)11575 Posts
On April 29 2010 16:37 Etherone wrote: FREE CHIBI!!!! i lol'd | ||
KwarK
United States42516 Posts
On April 29 2010 13:25 MourningWould wrote: "poor dude" was looking at material that portrayed someone as a child. It doesn't matter how old the pornstar actually was at the time of the filming, it's still sick in my opinion. Dude is getting off on kids... Something's not right there. Except no kids were harmed. I think this kind of shit should be encouraged. Some people will be paedophiles, it sucks but it appears to be a fetish that comes up. However that doesn't make them rapists, you can have a fetish without thinking it's okay to rape children. What it does do is put them in a dilemma in which they cannot legally satisfy their fetish. If you say that simply by virtue of being attracted to children they've crossed a line and give them no outlet for their fetish that'll turn the more moral paedophiles into angry introverts and the less moral into child abusers (which obv I do have a problem with). If on the other hand you say that child abuse is wrong but that having the fetish is fine (otherwise we're moving into the areas of thought crime) then you give them acceptable ways of getting off, like porn of flat chested waxed girls who are old enough to consent. Nobody exploited, nobody raped, everyone happy. | ||
|
Klive5ive
United Kingdom6056 Posts
| ||
|
So no fek
United States3001 Posts
On April 29 2010 16:14 Pika Chu wrote: The motive is they can watch children porn all day long to satisfy their inner pedo without getting in prison for it. Anyway, this world is getting more and more retarded. Sun tanned women in Teheran will go to prison, a guy in puerto rico does jail because the juridical system works just like a big joke, and a woman in nevada gets life imprisonment because a 13y touched her boobs. Next, when they invent a mind reading machine, they will put half of the world in jail because they are fantasizing of rapes and sweet 15y virgins. And don't forget the dude who went to prison for lolicon. Granted that was due to Obscenity laws, but it's still the same bullshit. | ||
|
haduken
Australia8267 Posts
hahaha, god I miss that guy. | ||
|
Craton
United States17246 Posts
Having watched one, I can safely say I'd never confuse her with someone <16. I could maybe see someone thinking she was 17, but only because of how much looks vary in the 16-22ish age range. 13? Hell no. And the fact that proof existed that the prosecutor tried to ignore/cover up is bullshit and should cost them their license. | ||
|
JohnColtrane
Australia4813 Posts
On April 29 2010 17:16 KwarK wrote: Except no kids were harmed. I think this kind of shit should be encouraged. Some people will be paedophiles, it sucks but it appears to be a fetish that comes up. However that doesn't make them rapists, you can have a fetish without thinking it's okay to rape children. What it does do is put them in a dilemma in which they cannot legally satisfy their fetish. If you say that simply by virtue of being attracted to children they've crossed a line and give them no outlet for their fetish that'll turn the more moral paedophiles into angry introverts and the less moral into child abusers (which obv I do have a problem with). If on the other hand you say that child abuse is wrong but that having the fetish is fine (otherwise we're moving into the areas of thought crime) then you give them acceptable ways of getting off, like porn of flat chested waxed girls who are old enough to consent. Nobody exploited, nobody raped, everyone happy. pretty much agree with what kwark is saying | ||
|
reit
Canada209 Posts
On April 29 2010 13:25 MourningWould wrote: "poor dude" was looking at material that portrayed someone as a child. It doesn't matter how old the pornstar actually was at the time of the filming, it's still sick in my opinion. Dude is getting off on kids... Something's not right there. Have you seen the said material? She's got D cups at least, not sure where the "child depiction" is. At worse she could be slightly jailbait material, but if you see a clear moral line between a 17 years and 364 days old individual and a 18 year old one, then I don't know what to say lol. | ||
|
Malinor
Germany4721 Posts
On April 29 2010 17:16 KwarK wrote: Except no kids were harmed. I think this kind of shit should be encouraged. Some people will be paedophiles, it sucks but it appears to be a fetish that comes up. However that doesn't make them rapists, you can have a fetish without thinking it's okay to rape children. What it does do is put them in a dilemma in which they cannot legally satisfy their fetish. If you say that simply by virtue of being attracted to children they've crossed a line and give them no outlet for their fetish that'll turn the more moral paedophiles into angry introverts and the less moral into child abusers (which obv I do have a problem with). If on the other hand you say that child abuse is wrong but that having the fetish is fine (otherwise we're moving into the areas of thought crime) then you give them acceptable ways of getting off, like porn of flat chested waxed girls who are old enough to consent. Nobody exploited, nobody raped, everyone happy. Great post, exactly this. | ||
|
foeffa
Belgium2115 Posts
| ||
|
KwarK
United States42516 Posts
On April 29 2010 15:08 JohnColtrane wrote: WHAT lol. life sentence? i dont think the 13 year old minded at all victimless crime Here I will have to disagree. When an adult encourages a child to touch them sexually something needs to be done, even if boobs are involved. I'm fine with people thinking whatever they like and fantasing and roleplaying with consenting adults but once you cross to involving children the law is right to slam down on you hard. | ||
|
meeple
Canada10211 Posts
| ||
|
Adeeler
United Kingdom764 Posts
Its like buying any item from a store you aren't accountable if the item was made by child labour in china... | ||
| ||
