|
On April 29 2010 13:45 FyRe_DragOn wrote:Show nested quote +
Even still, this wasn't enough to challenge the prosecutor's confidence in the child porn experts, who by this time we can assume had watched the video dozens, if not hundreds of times, in order to develop an unshakable faith in their own observations. The prosecution refused to subpoena the records from Fuentes' studio or even allow a copy of Fuentes' ID into evidence.
LOL also she doesnt look childish at all in the news link, you would think that to be mistaken for a 13year old she would be pretty flat but no.. She might have been flat in the video she had a lot of content before she got implants.... or so I'm told.
|
Poor guy.
He's lucky he wasn't caught in Australia however, because even with the pornstar flying over to testify, his charges wouldnt be overthrown. Our law states that if any porn has a character that looks too young (basically up to the discretion of the judge) it is considered child pornography. This law even includes anime porn (was a case a little while back of a guy being busted for child pornography because he had pictures of bart and lisa from the simpsons having sex).
Its basically the same argument as the whole, violent games will make you a serial killer, but applied to porn.
|
O.O if i ever visit Australia i will not be jerking off..
|
That guy is sick.
I only look at granny porn. Not because I like it, but just to make sure none of the porn stars I ogle have any resemblance to girls under the age of 18.
+ Show Spoiler +I haven't had an orgasm in years!
|
On April 29 2010 13:21 tonight wrote: Poor dude had to spend 8months in jail because the court system down there didn't care to really look into the matter. Poor dude just wanted to get off.
Seriously. That's really pathetic, you can literally look her age up on the internet. I don't understand how they can still hold him even though they were presented with indisputable evidence.
|
This is why you dont fly through puerto rico. 8 months in jail, thats INSANE.
|
|
We need to make "an eye for an eye" legal
|
On April 29 2010 13:55 DrywMz wrote:Show nested quote +On April 29 2010 13:45 FyRe_DragOn wrote:
Even still, this wasn't enough to challenge the prosecutor's confidence in the child porn experts, who by this time we can assume had watched the video dozens, if not hundreds of times, in order to develop an unshakable faith in their own observations. The prosecution refused to subpoena the records from Fuentes' studio or even allow a copy of Fuentes' ID into evidence.
LOL also she doesnt look childish at all in the news link, you would think that to be mistaken for a 13year old she would be pretty flat but no.. She might have been flat in the video she had a lot of content before she got implants.... or so I'm told.
shes south american, from what i know brazilian girls look fully developed at the age of 12
|
actually i think she was pretty flat before the implants, some kents on freeones were bitching about her getting it done
|
Tadzio April 29 2010 14:05. Posts 2172 PM Profile Blog Quote # That guy is sick.
I only look at granny porn. Not because I like it, but just to make sure none of the porn stars I ogle have any resemblance to girls under the age of 18.
+ Show Spoiler +
ROFL
This is awesome. Good to know the pornstars stand by their fans.
|
On April 29 2010 13:25 MourningWould wrote:Show nested quote +On April 29 2010 13:21 tonight wrote: Poor dude had to spend 8months in jail because the court system down there didn't care to really look into the matter. Poor dude just wanted to get off. "poor dude" was looking at material that portrayed someone as a child. It doesn't matter how old the pornstar actually was at the time of the filming, it's still sick in my opinion. Dude is getting off on kids... Something's not right there.
How do you know it was portraying her as a kid? From what we know, it was pornography that was later said to have someone who was 'underaged'... I mean, it could have had something like teen slapped on it but there legal teens (I won't bother explaining) but i doubt it said something like she was actually 13 in the video.
|
On April 29 2010 14:33 saltywet wrote:
shes south american, from what i know brazilian girls look fully developed at the age of 12
That is one of the most accidental dirty things I've ever read...
|
On April 29 2010 14:43 I_Love_Bacon wrote:Show nested quote +On April 29 2010 14:33 saltywet wrote:
shes south american, from what i know brazilian girls look fully developed at the age of 12 That is one of the most accidental dirty things I've ever read... Especially great because his username is "saltywet".
|
On April 29 2010 13:16 cHaNg-sTa wrote: Presumably after watching and re-watching the video several times to be sure, the customs officer -- who testified as an expert in child pornography -- determined that Fuentes was "13–14 years of age," and Simon-Timmerman was subsequently arrested and held awaiting trial for months, facing a 20-year prison sentence.
Mhmn. That's what he says.
Anyway, how hard is it to confirm an age before prosecuting?
|
Netherlands4980 Posts
Hahahaha. What a poor guy. I think it's funny how she is now rated #1 on this one site (after she got a boob job)
|
|
WHAT lol. life sentence? i dont think the 13 year old minded at all
victimless crime
|
On April 29 2010 15:08 JohnColtrane wrote:WHAT lol. life sentence? i dont think the 13 year old minded at all victimless crime
Clearly you didn't see what the breasts were attached to...
|
|
|
|
|