|
On December 31 2009 06:55 Wr3k wrote: ... fleshlight (supposedly the most realistic male sex toy) and honestly it doesn't compare to sex at all (though it kicks the shit out of using your hands). When the real thing isn't an option, there's likely something to be said for something better than hand
|
On December 31 2009 14:37 Xeris wrote: i wonder how much it costs to have sex with a pornstar... I'm sure there are ways to contact their agents or w/e and arrange something. anyone have any clue as to how much that would cost?
Maybe u can contact them through their official webpages.... i bet it is pretty expensive.. =D
|
On December 31 2009 12:20 ghermination wrote: The problem is: Most people over 18 have money, and those that have money get laid. It takes money to buy one of these things. The people under 18, and who do not have money, are the people who would want these the most. However, they can't get one. I think they're marketing to the wrong segment here. Maybe they should attach one of these to the next "tickle me elmo" and it would be called something like "Elmo has the vagina of Jenna Jameson" Thats just bullshit. No money doesnt=no pussy. And money doesnt=pussy either. I mean, anyone here over 18 who said they havent masterbated many a thousands of times since their birthday would just be a fuckin lier. Hell, even if they had a gf/wife during that period. lol.
|
On December 31 2009 15:17 yhnmk wrote:Show nested quote +On December 31 2009 12:20 ghermination wrote: The problem is: Most people over 18 have money, and those that have money get laid. It takes money to buy one of these things. The people under 18, and who do not have money, are the people who would want these the most. However, they can't get one. I think they're marketing to the wrong segment here. Maybe they should attach one of these to the next "tickle me elmo" and it would be called something like "Elmo has the vagina of Jenna Jameson" Thats just bullshit. No money doesnt=no pussy. And money doesnt=pussy either. I mean, anyone here over 18 who said they havent masterbated many a thousands of times since their birthday would just be a fuckin lier. Hell, even if they had a gf/wife during that period. lol.
your post is trying to explain why "no money doesnt=no pussy" and how "Money doesnt = pussy". yet i see no explanation to it.
Sorry but if u have money, you have power. If you have power, you got girls.
|
On December 31 2009 15:21 Jaxtyk wrote:Show nested quote +On December 31 2009 15:17 yhnmk wrote:On December 31 2009 12:20 ghermination wrote: The problem is: Most people over 18 have money, and those that have money get laid. It takes money to buy one of these things. The people under 18, and who do not have money, are the people who would want these the most. However, they can't get one. I think they're marketing to the wrong segment here. Maybe they should attach one of these to the next "tickle me elmo" and it would be called something like "Elmo has the vagina of Jenna Jameson" Thats just bullshit. No money doesnt=no pussy. And money doesnt=pussy either. I mean, anyone here over 18 who said they havent masterbated many a thousands of times since their birthday would just be a fuckin lier. Hell, even if they had a gf/wife during that period. lol. your post is trying to explain why "no money doesnt=no pussy" and how "Money doesnt = pussy". yet i see no explanation to it. Sorry but if u have money, you have power. If you have power, you got girls. No it wasnt an attempt to explain, actually. And no, having a job doesn't create long term or temporary relationships out of thin air. Gotta have personality, know how to speak with women, ability to maintain a long relationship- yada yada. Its a lot more complex then "bitch I got a job!", rather sexist that you think it isnt. Oh well.
|
this has come off as slightly disturbing to me
oh you crazy men these days
|
On December 31 2009 11:49 Turbovolver wrote:Show nested quote +On December 31 2009 05:13 Slaughter wrote: Does being in the "Lol im cool on the internetz" group make you feel better? Actually I'm rallying against that very crowd, bragging about the fact that they'd never resort to a sex toy and calling a bunch of people losers. The whole point is it isn't resorting to anything, it's enhancing.
People with 5.9 inches and foreskin that's too tight generally need enhancing :o
Hi Brodie! :D
|
On December 31 2009 12:20 ghermination wrote: The problem is: Most people over 18 have money, and those that have money get laid. It takes money to buy one of these things. The people under 18, and who do not have money, are the people who would want these the most. However, they can't get one. I think they're marketing to the wrong segment here. Maybe they should attach one of these to the next "tickle me elmo" and it would be called something like "Elmo has the vagina of Jenna Jameson"
Most people 18-23 are piss broke.
|
You guys are just haters... it could work. I'm aroused.
|
On December 31 2009 15:29 yhnmk wrote:Show nested quote +On December 31 2009 15:21 Jaxtyk wrote:On December 31 2009 15:17 yhnmk wrote:On December 31 2009 12:20 ghermination wrote: The problem is: Most people over 18 have money, and those that have money get laid. It takes money to buy one of these things. The people under 18, and who do not have money, are the people who would want these the most. However, they can't get one. I think they're marketing to the wrong segment here. Maybe they should attach one of these to the next "tickle me elmo" and it would be called something like "Elmo has the vagina of Jenna Jameson" Thats just bullshit. No money doesnt=no pussy. And money doesnt=pussy either. I mean, anyone here over 18 who said they havent masterbated many a thousands of times since their birthday would just be a fuckin lier. Hell, even if they had a gf/wife during that period. lol. your post is trying to explain why "no money doesnt=no pussy" and how "Money doesnt = pussy". yet i see no explanation to it. Sorry but if u have money, you have power. If you have power, you got girls. No it wasnt an attempt to explain, actually. And no, having a job doesn't create long term or temporary relationships out of thin air. Gotta have personality, know how to speak with women, ability to maintain a long relationship- yada yada. Its a lot more complex then "bitch I got a job!", rather sexist that you think it isnt. Oh well. Seriously though, you need a job if you wanna get laid consistently.
Anyway it's funny to see all these teenagers posting stuff like "LOL JUST GET LAID" because you know they're just thinking to themselves "I better be able to get laid when I..."
Genius idea and if they make it cheaper it will have mass appeal. Dildos and pocket pussies don't cuddle, though, but it's probably a great way to get off.
|
On December 30 2009 23:42 29 fps wrote: introduce this device to countries with overpopulation problems. and make sure they have computers.
good luck with that.
|
On December 31 2009 15:29 yhnmk wrote:Show nested quote +On December 31 2009 15:21 Jaxtyk wrote:On December 31 2009 15:17 yhnmk wrote:On December 31 2009 12:20 ghermination wrote: The problem is: Most people over 18 have money, and those that have money get laid. It takes money to buy one of these things. The people under 18, and who do not have money, are the people who would want these the most. However, they can't get one. I think they're marketing to the wrong segment here. Maybe they should attach one of these to the next "tickle me elmo" and it would be called something like "Elmo has the vagina of Jenna Jameson" Thats just bullshit. No money doesnt=no pussy. And money doesnt=pussy either. I mean, anyone here over 18 who said they havent masterbated many a thousands of times since their birthday would just be a fuckin lier. Hell, even if they had a gf/wife during that period. lol. your post is trying to explain why "no money doesnt=no pussy" and how "Money doesnt = pussy". yet i see no explanation to it. Sorry but if u have money, you have power. If you have power, you got girls. No it wasnt an attempt to explain, actually. And no, having a job doesn't create long term or temporary relationships out of thin air. Gotta have personality, know how to speak with women, ability to maintain a long relationship- yada yada. Its a lot more complex then "bitch I got a job!", rather sexist that you think it isnt. Oh well.
There's your problem right there.
You don't have to be in a long term relationship to get laid.
|
Getting laid still can be time consuming and hit or miss. I think this device will come out cost effective in the long run, and it is a time saver, not to mention a hassle-saver. Then again, the same could be said for castration.
|
I'm personally curious, but I still find it unconceivable that someone would spend 400$ to jack-off just like I don't see why one would pay for a porn subscription when... it's the internet. I would much rather spend that 400$ over several clubbing/party nights and possibly get a quickie out of it, then to commit to loneliness. Find me the same device for 50$ (how much do dildos sell for?) and I won't be singing the same song though
|
virtual sex toy, thats just horrid. real sex will always be the thing
|
After having seen Avatar yesterday, I wonder when the first 3d porn movies will be released ^^
|
Pretty sure those already exist
|
On January 04 2010 01:34 BentoBox wrote: Pretty sure those already exist I'd be very surprised since I'm sure the cameras you need to do that properly are very expensive, while porn movies aren't exactly known for having a huge budget.. I just googled "3d porn".. there's a ton of results... but, you know, its stuff like this (obviously NSFW)
+ Show Spoiler + Monsters vs. Babes 3D Sex Battles ftw, LOL
|
|
|
|