EPTTotal War: Rome II - Page 77
| Forum Index > General Games |
Xxio
Canada5565 Posts
| ||
|
Greem
730 Posts
Edit : Plus its not secret the AI need to recruit better units. If they fix this its gonna be much harder . | ||
|
Disregard
China10252 Posts
| ||
|
TerransHill
Germany572 Posts
On September 19 2013 04:57 sc4k wrote: A friend of mine made this picture lol, sums up much of the rage about one of the elements of the game lol: http://imgbox.com/abiMsZVP The flag makes sense. It appears when you lay siege to a city and the defender attacks. He needs to get to that area to break the siege. It also prevents you from conquering a city with just 1 squad of cavalary running around until the 60 minutes are over. I dont know why it would appear when u dont siege a city, but that usually shouldnt happen. | ||
|
Greem
730 Posts
On September 20 2013 10:52 Disregard wrote: They do that in MTW2, factions would form temporary alliances to hinder your expansion. Didn't remember that, but yeah, i wonder why they don't use this "old" ideas from they previous games. | ||
|
andrewlt
United States7702 Posts
On September 20 2013 10:52 Disregard wrote: They do that in MTW2, factions would form temporary alliances to hinder your expansion. They did that in every game since MTW 1 or RTW 1. Random factions would just randomly declare war on you to slow you down, even if they really have nothing to gain from declaring war on you. STW2 had the realm divide mechanic. It's a very boardgamey mechanic that renders diplomacy useless. Some people actually like to do some sort of roleplay while they play the campaign. I do some of it, conquering stuff on my own pace. Ironically, these AI alliances speed up my expansion since they force me to counterattack even during the times I want to turtle up a bit to wait for some new unit I want to use. | ||
|
xDaunt
United States17988 Posts
| ||
|
Sermokala
United States14137 Posts
| ||
|
RolleMcKnolle
Germany1054 Posts
| ||
|
Xxio
Canada5565 Posts
| ||
|
RolleMcKnolle
Germany1054 Posts
On September 21 2013 03:08 Xxio wrote: It looks like CA is doing everything right to fix the game. they still didnt remove torches | ||
|
SCkad
Scotland97 Posts
Torches as in burn down the gates torches? you can't want those removed surely. or have you never seen the "lucky fire arrow sets your ram alight and forces you to lose the battle" of Rome 1 | ||
|
Zinnwaldite
Norway1567 Posts
On September 21 2013 03:32 SCkad wrote: Torches as in burn down the gates torches? you can't want those removed surely. or have you never seen the "lucky fire arrow sets your ram alight and forces you to lose the battle" of Rome 1 Bring more rams. | ||
|
RvB
Netherlands6277 Posts
On September 21 2013 02:09 Sermokala wrote: I think it is that legions are too good. They come way to early in the campaign as well. Even if they are pretty expensive (can't even keep up 2 whole armies of them with all of italia) there is nothing that can match them in melle. Yeah they come way to early... if you tech for it you'll barely use your pre marian reform legions which is a shame since they're awesome in their own right. | ||
|
xDaunt
United States17988 Posts
On September 21 2013 04:21 RvB wrote: Yeah they come way to early... if you tech for it you'll barely use your pre marian reform legions which is a shame since they're awesome in their own right. I pretty much beeline the tier 3 barracks tech regardless of who I play. It's a little too easy to get, and it provides a huge, huge military advantage. Hell, if you're playing as the Romans or one of the successor states, you are getting units that are almost as good as your tier 4 units. | ||
|
RolleMcKnolle
Germany1054 Posts
On September 21 2013 03:32 SCkad wrote: Torches as in burn down the gates torches? you can't want those removed surely. or have you never seen the "lucky fire arrow sets your ram alight and forces you to lose the battle" of Rome 1 well if u attacked a wall with one ram its ur own fault. and yes I want these torches removed they are just utterly stupid, and dont even serve a real use in the game. Why do I need to be able to conquer every province capital without even bringing siege weapons? | ||
|
SCkad
Scotland97 Posts
On September 21 2013 05:16 RolleMcKnolle wrote: well if u attacked a wall with one ram its ur own fault. and yes I want these torches removed they are just utterly stupid, and dont even serve a real use in the game. Why do I need to be able to conquer every province capital without even bringing siege weapons? how about they fix the siege equipment first THEN consider removing torches m'kay? i don't mean the ballistae but the ladders and the rams and the galleys need to be fixed first. you can start by letting me move siege equipment so that burning the walls is not the quickest way into the city | ||
|
RvB
Netherlands6277 Posts
On September 21 2013 04:49 xDaunt wrote: I pretty much beeline the tier 3 barracks tech regardless of who I play. It's a little too easy to get, and it provides a huge, huge military advantage. Hell, if you're playing as the Romans or one of the successor states, you are getting units that are almost as good as your tier 4 units. I'll do the same thing in my next campaign but I usually don't like to impose limits unto myself to compensate for silly design. | ||
|
Xxio
Canada5565 Posts
| ||
|
Makro
France16890 Posts
| ||
| ||
