|
On May 27 2014 22:12 Jockmcplop wrote:Show nested quote +On May 27 2014 22:03 DarthPunk wrote: AMD catalyst 14.6 released.
Game still runs like arse. It runs fairly well for me. No massive lags. i5 2500k 8gb vengeance ram R9 280x
What is 'fairly' well? what settings? I don't have massive framedrops either. I average probably 45 fps. 60+ indoors getting to sub 30 at times whilst driving.
To me that is running like arse.
|
On May 27 2014 22:24 DarthPunk wrote:Show nested quote +On May 27 2014 22:12 Jockmcplop wrote:On May 27 2014 22:03 DarthPunk wrote: AMD catalyst 14.6 released.
Game still runs like arse. It runs fairly well for me. No massive lags. i5 2500k 8gb vengeance ram R9 280x What is 'fairly' well? what settings? I don't have massive framedrops either. I average probably 45 fps. 60+ indoors getting to sub 30 at times whilst driving. To me that is running like arse.
I run it on ultra, and get between 30-60 FPS. That's pretty low, i agree, but its smoother than, say, Arma 3.
Load times are bad though, and the pop in is so bad its almost funny.
|
On May 27 2014 22:26 Jockmcplop wrote:Show nested quote +On May 27 2014 22:24 DarthPunk wrote:On May 27 2014 22:12 Jockmcplop wrote:On May 27 2014 22:03 DarthPunk wrote: AMD catalyst 14.6 released.
Game still runs like arse. It runs fairly well for me. No massive lags. i5 2500k 8gb vengeance ram R9 280x What is 'fairly' well? what settings? I don't have massive framedrops either. I average probably 45 fps. 60+ indoors getting to sub 30 at times whilst driving. To me that is running like arse. I run it on ultra, and get between 30-60 FPS. That's pretty low, i agree, but its smoother than, say, Arma 3. Load times are bad though, and the pop in is so bad its almost funny.
It doesn't even look that good. Actually reminds me of GTA 4 on PC. Ran like arse no matter the hardware.
|
I'm just pissed that i now have to have Steam, Origin, Battle.net and UPlay.
Such a joke, i don't understand how this shit flies with Microsoft.
Give us an appstore that isn't Games for Windows Live already! All these games require Direct X anyways so why not consolidate and license it? The Apple appstore is an absolute good, not a way to squeeze indie developers.
Valve have had their time in the spotlight with Steam, now that everyone's making their own service it's time for big brother to step in.
|
Netherlands45349 Posts
|
There are times where I get very low fps but it runs fine most of the time. The game is actually very fun but the problem for me is I get a headache/dizzyness from playing it after 1-2 hours. Very annoying.
|
I was watching JP play this for a bit last night and he mentioned that for him the game was running at 120 FPS and looked great, but I'm not sure what kind of set up he has other than it's obviously pretty high end.
Personally, I just don't think these kind of games do it for me, but the story looked compelling enough that I'll probably pick it up when its on sale in a year and play through it once.
|
I think the problem with this game : It's just another Ubisoft open world game. It's Assassin's creed and FarCry 3 with another skin and a few new gimmicks.
I feel like after the E3 presentation, I was expecting more, but it seems like the guys at Ubisoft are cursed to recreate the same mistakes everytime.
|
Hmm.. I was expecting the graphics to be a bit better.
|
Norway1567 Posts
I'll wait,, not the ¨oh snap!!¨ game people wanted it to be,, i'll probably get it around fall or christmas..
|
I'll wait for sale on Steam and check it out if the price is low enough.
|
On May 27 2014 23:47 Pibacc wrote: There are times where I get very low fps but it runs fine most of the time. The game is actually very fun but the problem for me is I get a headache/dizzyness from playing it after 1-2 hours. Very annoying.
that indicates a major bullshit in this game. but try to get your money back. motion sickness in a AAA title is just fail
|
On May 28 2014 02:21 tadL wrote:Show nested quote +On May 27 2014 23:47 Pibacc wrote: There are times where I get very low fps but it runs fine most of the time. The game is actually very fun but the problem for me is I get a headache/dizzyness from playing it after 1-2 hours. Very annoying. that indicates a major bullshit in this game. but try to get your money back. motion sickness in a AAA title is just fail Hardly uncommon.
See if you can change the Field of View. That is normally the cause of it.
|
That just smells like a rushed port job to the PC.
|
On May 28 2014 02:30 Gorsameth wrote:Show nested quote +On May 28 2014 02:21 tadL wrote:On May 27 2014 23:47 Pibacc wrote: There are times where I get very low fps but it runs fine most of the time. The game is actually very fun but the problem for me is I get a headache/dizzyness from playing it after 1-2 hours. Very annoying. that indicates a major bullshit in this game. but try to get your money back. motion sickness in a AAA title is just fail Hardly uncommon. See if you can change the Field of View. That is normally the cause of it.
Using a controller can also help with the motion sickness, i too get motion sick in a lot of FPS/3rd person games. But using a controller can help since its less jerky, even at a higher stick sensitivity since the movement is much slower overall, it may not be ideal, but i would give it a shot.
|
On May 28 2014 04:55 c0ldfusion wrote: That just smells like a rushed port job to the PC. Which si strange, since the release got extended by about 5 months and it's native on PC. Doesn't look like it, but it's natively created on PC.
I'm really enjoying the game except for one bug. Whenever I try to upgrade battery life II (aka up to 5 bars), my game freezes and then crashes a couple seconds afterwards. I tried this with both the 14.4 and 14.6 (my current) CCC drivers, and the same issue keeps happening. It also doesn't sync with the cloud but I'm assuming that's just uPlay being uPlay. Anyone else experience this or similar things, and any solutions? :O
|
Serious question:Is Michael Jordan's Statue in the game? :D Any1 from Chicago can confirm? If it isnt....
|
I am really enjoying this game so far. I haven't played any of the newer GTAs (last one was Vice City) or Assassin's Creeds or anything else resembling Watch Dogs so I don't really have anything to compare it to. To me it feels full of content and pretty atmospheric as well but that might be just because I am not used to these types of games. The controls are a bit clunky somehow, but I didn't really expect anything else from a multiplatform game.
With a lower end setup I am running this game on close to lowest settings and I am not noticing any lag at all. The game has frozen up for around a quarter of a second a few times when I've been driving fast vehicles at max speeds through highways. It still looks pretty good in my eyes, even on the lowest settings but like I said, I haven't played any games with graphics as a main feature for awhile.
I can't speak on the campaign yet because I've only done a few of the missions and been freeroaming the rest of the time. As for gameplay it is good enough in my opinion. I've been sneaking through most of the content I've played so far and it's pretty cool. The combat areas are well designed for stealthy play from what I've seen. I haven't ran into anything difficult yet, but I can definitely see it happening later in the game. As for action, pointing and shooting is pretty bad but after playing games where you're meant to shoot everything these types of hybrid games always feel bad. Good shooters can only be FPS games in my opinion, I can't think of any 3rd person shooters which aren't mediocre at best.
Many people seem to dislike the vehicle physics and anything related to that. I would agree if I was expecting a car simulator, but I went in expecting more of an arcade feel which I think the game delivers on. It is weird how you won't take damage from serious vehicle accidents though.
Most annoying things so far are the controls, and the automatic profiler thing. It's such a cool thing to be able to check out people and maybe get some stuff to hack and what not, but why can't it just show the profile of the person I am pointing at? Does it have to kind of autoaim and keep the first person I see for a few seconds before moving on to the one I am keeping my aim on? It drives me insane...
I bought it for the multiplayer because it seems awesome but apparently I have to do some kind of tutorial before unlocking it. I assume it's somewhere in the campaign so I'll try to unlock it in my next session.
|
they have started to censored the steam tags for the game. Now it will only showe such useful tags as "#fun" and "#Masterpeice" (lol)
Try to add "DRM" or "Uplay" for example.
I hate that people buy games from these companies over and over. They complain afterwards, but then on the next hyped game, they will pay fucking 70 euro once more instead of letting the companies rot and die out.
|
On May 28 2014 08:17 LaNague wrote: they have started to censored the steam tags for the game. Now it will only showe such useful tags as "#fun" and "#Masterpeice" (lol)
Try to add "DRM" or "Uplay" for example.
I hate that people buy games from these companies over and over. They complain afterwards, but then on the next hyped game, they will pay fucking 70 euro once more instead of letting the companies rot and die out.
Complaining in this sense i agree is kind of funny, but the last 3 Ubi games that have come out (Far Cry 3, AC Black Flag, and now Watch Dogs) have been quite good IMO, so i wouldnt want UBI to die out necessarily. I think UPLAY should die just like fucking GFWL, but the 3 games ive mentioned were well worth the 60$, theyre all good games with many hours of gameplay and i think people should gladly keep buying them, and just stop falling for all the hype. Just my 2 cents heh.
|
|
|
|