EPTOn September 25 2012 13:24 Wedge wrote:
![[image loading]](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/A3nDr-sCEAE-gll.jpg)
My god, says it all.
What a farce.
My god, says it all.
What a farce.
the best part is when they look right at each other and then give the signal
NFL 2012 Season - Page 65
| Forum Index > General Games |
|
a176
Canada6688 Posts
the best part is when they look right at each other and then give the signal | ||
|
durza
United States667 Posts
How the rule reads. | ||
|
Irave
United States9965 Posts
On September 25 2012 13:26 a176 wrote: the best part is when they look right at each other and then give the signal ![[image loading]](http://assets.sbnation.com/assets/1427801/hailmar2.gif) | ||
|
Damiani
United States514 Posts
| ||
|
Stratos_speAr
United States6959 Posts
| ||
|
xDaunt
United States17988 Posts
| ||
|
ex_cutd10
United States40 Posts
| ||
|
Wedge
Canada580 Posts
Its mesmerising | ||
|
durza
United States667 Posts
(Packers Tight End) 13th man beat us tonight. | ||
|
Damiani
United States514 Posts
| ||
|
BluePanther
United States2776 Posts
On September 25 2012 13:26 durza wrote: if a pass is caught simultaneously by two eligible opponents, and both players retain it, the ball belongs to the passers. It is not a simultaneous catch if a player gains control first and an opponent subsequently gains joint control. If the ball is muffed after simultaneous touching by two such players, all the players of the passing team become eligible to catch the loose ball. How the rule reads. It's a catch. We got royally screwed. Even a High School ref should have gotten that call right. That wasn't one of those tricky things. I knew the second the play happened it was an interception, and anyone saying otherwise was looking for what they wanted and not actually watching it. The worst part is that they didn't even confer. They never seem to until it's too late. | ||
|
DannyJ
United States5110 Posts
| ||
|
Leftwing
Canada229 Posts
| ||
|
Cornstyle
United States147 Posts
| ||
|
Irave
United States9965 Posts
On September 25 2012 13:32 Damiani wrote: Could someone do a gif on the pass interference please?? Have the entire play, bask in its awesome. ![[image loading]](http://assets.sbnation.com/assets/1427785/hailmary.gif) | ||
|
Stratos_speAr
United States6959 Posts
On September 25 2012 13:35 Leftwing wrote: I was cheering for the Seakhawks to win and even I have to say that GB deserved to win, in fact they earned it. Mutual possession? Jennings was the only person that had reasonable control on that ball, clearly an interception. Not only did they get it wrong on the field but in the booth?! That's insane. The CFL has better referees than these replacement jokes. It's not that they got it wrong in the booth; the problem is that you aren't allowed to review possession calls when reviewing the scoring play in that situation (at least that's what they said on MNF). Once he called it a touchdown on the field they were screwed. | ||
|
p90p91
United States2 Posts
| ||
|
semantics
10040 Posts
| ||
|
ex_cutd10
United States40 Posts
I know he should be happy that his team won, but "Good call." that is just laughable, makes me wonder if Pete Carroll thinks he is still coaching with the USC Trojans in NCAA Football. | ||
|
BluePanther
United States2776 Posts
On September 25 2012 13:35 Cornstyle wrote: LOL another idea gentlemen and ladies. We've already seen through the NBA what a rogue ( meaning affected by illicit gambling) referee can do. Can you seriously doubt that an NFL referee could be influenced by the same folks? I'm sorry, but these replacement refs wont be paid much, and its not hard to think that someone could have offered the Seattle vs GB refs a bonus to go a certain way. (Which wouldnt be hard because most Pack fans would have been worried about this game) To go for the Hawks, which is against the Vegas line? Just a thought. Regardless the refs suck and I want to do terrible things to some refs. I'm a Packer owner and I'm not even suggesting conspiracy. I just think they're that bad. | ||
| ||
