NFL 2012 Season - Page 63
Forum Index > General Games |
Cam Connor
Canada786 Posts
| ||
semantics
10040 Posts
On September 25 2012 13:01 BloodNinja wrote: As I said earlier, I don't believe the real refs woulda gotten that final call correct either. But then again, with the real refs the game probably would have been completely different in the first place. real refs would have penalized seahawks defense out of their dirty playing week 1, seahawk games turn dirty because their defense takes all chances it can get with these bad refs. But then again that's my opinion, man these tears are so delicious | ||
y0su
Finland7871 Posts
On September 25 2012 12:59 andrewlt wrote: Of all the teams to get robbed, it's the league's only publicly owned team. I wonder what their shareholders are thinking? I'm good friends with someone who owns GB stock... He's NOT pleased. | ||
durza
United States667 Posts
On September 25 2012 13:03 y0su wrote: I'm good friends with someone who owns GB stock... He's NOT pleased. Yeah my uncle has GB stock, hes flipping out right now. | ||
hp.Shell
United States2527 Posts
| ||
Wedge
Canada580 Posts
Like everyone is saying, eager to read all the articles and all the coverage this is going to get tommorow, and on sports radio. At the very least, it'll be entertaining. | ||
Candadar
2049 Posts
OH MAN WHAT A FUCKING JOKE | ||
BluePanther
United States2776 Posts
On September 25 2012 13:04 durza wrote: Yeah my uncle has GB stock, hes flipping out right now. I'm a Packers owner... It's so frustrating as a non-profit team to be the one who gets screwed over by the greed. I'll definitely be lodging my two cents on this. I hated it before, and now it's just ridiculous... these refs are not looking for something the league cannot afford. I'm calling the Packers office and the league office (whatever good it does). | ||
y0su
Finland7871 Posts
On September 25 2012 13:01 BloodNinja wrote: As I said earlier, I don't believe the real refs woulda gotten that final call correct either. But then again, with the real refs the game probably would have been completely different in the first place. I've also maintained that the real refs make lots of bad decisions on a weekly basis... On September 25 2012 13:00 Probe1 wrote: I've been on the fence about the officiating controversy until now. There is no way you can remain ambivalent when referees blow calls that decide games. It was over and then ridiculous defensive PI. It was over and then ridiculous ruling of a touchdown when the receiver had no control. What a mess. ... but the biggest issue that I see is... On September 25 2012 13:03 semantics wrote: real refs would have penalized seahawks defense out of their dirty playing week 1, seahawk games turn dirty because their defense takes all chances it can get with these bad refs. But then again that's my opinion, man these tears are so delicious ... these refs aren't in control of the game. EDIT: If I was in charge of the ref's union I'd start thinking of raising the demands! | ||
hp.Shell
United States2527 Posts
On September 25 2012 13:07 y0su wrote: I've also maintained that the real refs make lots of bad decisions on a weekly basis... ... but the biggest issue that I see is... ... these refs aren't in control of the game. The refs ARE in control of the game, Packers-Seahawks just proved that, or am I wrong? | ||
BloodNinja
United States2791 Posts
On September 25 2012 13:03 semantics wrote: real refs would have penalized seahawks defense out of their dirty playing week 1, seahawk games turn dirty because their defense takes all chances it can get with these bad refs. But then again that's my opinion, man these tears are so delicious Im certainly not a seahawks fan. I have no idea what happened with them week 1 whatsoever. My statement is that these games play out much differently with the real refs correctly calling many of the mistakes that have been made. | ||
flexgd
183 Posts
| ||
ex_cutd10
United States40 Posts
| ||
Damiani
United States514 Posts
On September 25 2012 13:01 BloodNinja wrote: As I said earlier, I don't believe the real refs woulda gotten that final call correct either. But then again, with the real refs the game probably would have been completely different in the first place. Are you serious? You really don't think the real refs would of called this correctly? I'm 99.9999% positive they would. I'm also 99.99% sure they would of called that blatant pass interference on Golden Tate. | ||
czylu
477 Posts
![]() | ||
BloodNinja
United States2791 Posts
On September 25 2012 13:09 Damiani wrote: Are you serious? You really don't think the real refs would of called this correctly? I'm 99.9999% positive they would. I'm also 99.99% sure they would of called that blatant pass interference on Golden Tate. Then you have much more faith in the refs than I do. Most these jump ball hail mary plays have pass interference (both defensive and offensive) in them. Very, very, very rarely does it get called. | ||
I_Love_Bacon
United States5765 Posts
| ||
hp.Shell
United States2527 Posts
Gotta stop reading the thread. I'm going nuts. | ||
Candadar
2049 Posts
| ||
durza
United States667 Posts
| ||
| ||