EPTRG3 doesn't need much to succeed with fantasy numbers or in the game in general. One week he put up points with passing, the next rushing. Now going up against a defense that can't stop the run, or pass. Having RG3 on that offense is nothing to scoff at.
NFL 2012 Season - Page 50
| Forum Index > General Games |
|
Irave
United States9965 Posts
RG3 doesn't need much to succeed with fantasy numbers or in the game in general. One week he put up points with passing, the next rushing. Now going up against a defense that can't stop the run, or pass. Having RG3 on that offense is nothing to scoff at. | ||
|
SweeTLemonS[TPR]
11739 Posts
On September 20 2012 12:39 Irave wrote: Panthers defense isn't that horrible. They picked Brees off twice last week. They even nicely contained TB which is something the Giants couldn't do. This shouldn't turn into a Eli 4th quarter slaughter. Bradshaw being out isn't a huge issue, when Andre Brown had no issue stepping in for him, looked good too. They still don't trust Wilson, and Carolina loses on the ground. Subtract Nicks from the game, you have Cruz and uh who else for the Giants? RG3 doesn't need much to succeed with fantasy numbers or in the game in general. One week he put up points with passing, the next rushing. Now going up against a defense that can't stop the run, or pass. Having RG3 on that offense is nothing to scoff at. Which is exactly why RG3 is going to have a bad week. It's just how the NFL works. | ||
|
Irave
United States9965 Posts
| ||
|
QuanticHawk
United States32081 Posts
On September 20 2012 09:25 semantics wrote: I wouldn't say helmet to chest up into chin the worlds cleanest block. Anyways tate looked like he hurt himself doing that the way he stumbled around after making the block. I figured it was where the initial contact is, not where the follow through lands. it's kind of hard to control that when you're both heading complete opposite ways at full speed as far as Cruz, while the Panther D isn't that good, him playing without Nicks across from him and no Bradshaw is probably gonna give us a good glimpse of who he really is as a receiver. i still think he is a pretty solid guy, but one who benefits greatly from Eli and having a stud line up across him | ||
|
Durp
Canada3117 Posts
On September 20 2012 22:34 QuanticHawk wrote: I figured it was where the initial contact is, not where the follow through lands. it's kind of hard to control that when you're both heading complete opposite ways at full speed as far as Cruz, while the Panther D isn't that good, him playing without Nicks across from him and no Bradshaw is probably gonna give us a good glimpse of who he really is as a receiver. i still think he is a pretty solid guy, but one who benefits greatly from Eli and having a stud line up across him Exactly how I feel. I'm looking to pick up a different defense in my fantasy league. I picked up New Orleans for the week against Kansas City, but that's only for a one week flyer as I find a better team available. The current taken defenses are: Houston, Pittsburgh, New York Jets, Chicago, Detroit, Baltimore, Buffalo, San Fransisco, and Philadelphia. Thoughts anyone? Each week your D's total points have a deduction from a base amount for total points allowed in their game, with additional points awarded for: Sacks, Safeties, Interceptions, Fumble Recoveries, Touchdowns, Blocked Kicks, and Return Touchdowns. I'm currently giving Arizona a serious consideration. | ||
|
QuanticHawk
United States32081 Posts
| ||
|
Durp
Canada3117 Posts
On September 21 2012 05:47 QuanticHawk wrote: I usually run match ups. I did Jets vs MIA. Was thinking about NO vs KC, but NO looks fucking brutal on d right now too and charles is too good to not light them up We have a maximum move amount in our league, so changing defenses every week would seriously eat into my ability to make any other roster changes. I'm trying to find some available team that is consistent, but so far it's been slim pickings. | ||
|
QuanticHawk
United States32081 Posts
I'd sort by sacks and then points allowed, since those are probably the most reliable stat year to year. | ||
|
BloodNinja
United States2791 Posts
On September 21 2012 03:04 Durp wrote: Exactly how I feel. I'm looking to pick up a different defense in my fantasy league. I picked up New Orleans for the week against Kansas City, but that's only for a one week flyer as I find a better team available. The current taken defenses are: Houston, Pittsburgh, New York Jets, Chicago, Detroit, Baltimore, Buffalo, San Fransisco, and Philadelphia. Thoughts anyone? Each week your D's total points have a deduction from a base amount for total points allowed in their game, with additional points awarded for: Sacks, Safeties, Interceptions, Fumble Recoveries, Touchdowns, Blocked Kicks, and Return Touchdowns. I'm currently giving Arizona a serious consideration. What is your bench situation like? If you have room and want to limit waiver transactions. You could pick up two mid-level defenses who play bad teams at different times. This is probably the route I would go if I was in your shoes. So if you grabbed Arizona like you are thinking, you could grab the Seahawks, Charger, or Pats for example. Edit - by limited roster changes does that mean limited movement within the roster as well? Or just waiver pickups / trades? | ||
|
itkovian
United States1763 Posts
On September 20 2012 12:07 SweeTLemonS[TPR] wrote: That was such a beautiful block too. Completely clean... NFL really is starting to become the No Fun League. Maybe they'll become the WGP soon, We're Giant Pussies. lol.. really, there are so many fun things about the NFL, that losing out on the occasional "big hit", because players are worried about getting fined, isn't going to detract much from the game or its "fun" level. | ||
|
BloodNinja
United States2791 Posts
http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/8404563/nfl-issues-field-conduct-warning-owners-general-managers-coaches-all-32-teams If the coaches would kindly ignore this memo I would be a happy man. I think we need more rage gifs to come out of this season. Maybe we can 1 for each coach and 16 for Harbaugh. | ||
|
a176
Canada6688 Posts
| ||
|
Damiani
United States514 Posts
| ||
|
Damiani
United States514 Posts
On September 21 2012 09:59 a176 wrote: guys, is JPP the best defender in the league? Justin Smith 49ers | ||
Souma
2nd Worst City in CA8938 Posts
| ||
|
BloodNinja
United States2791 Posts
On September 21 2012 10:02 Damiani wrote: something tells me starting steve smith is a mistake for me. But picking up Eli and starting him looks promising. Looks like you should be fine with Smith. The way the game is going right now, the Panthers are gonna need to throw the ball 60 times jsut to try and close the gap. | ||
|
dp
United States234 Posts
On September 21 2012 10:08 Damiani wrote: + Show Spoiler + On September 21 2012 09:59 a176 wrote: guys, is JPP the best defender in the league? Justin Smith 49ers Don't think so. Justin Smith is more on the level of Justin Tuck when he is healthy, while JPP is a small step above both. | ||
|
xDaunt
United States17988 Posts
On September 21 2012 10:48 dp wrote: Don't think so. Justin Smith is more on the level of Justin Tuck when he is healthy, while JPP is a small step above both. I'd take DeMarcus Ware over all of them. | ||
|
a176
Canada6688 Posts
| ||
GTR
51486 Posts
| ||
| ||
