EPTCivilization V Succession Game- Random Leader - Page 9
| Forum Index > General Games |
|
Blazinghand
United States25559 Posts
| ||
|
Laneir
United States1160 Posts
| ||
|
Perseverance
Japan2800 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25559 Posts
| ||
|
Furycrab
Canada456 Posts
On June 11 2011 03:17 Blazinghand wrote: Assuming we don't get streamtrained by ghandi soon, we should be starting up a new one shortly-- furycrab has put us into a good position for the science victory, and assuming we can keep on trolling ghandi out of his CS allies so he doesn't UN us to death, it shouldn't be any real trouble. I felt bad dismantling a little bit of the specialist structure, and at first it was kicking me a bit with some growth problems, but once I trolled a few of Ghandis CS allies it gave me a lot of luxury resources and I was pleasantly surprised at how productive that bottom right city turned out. I got the feeling that Washington was getting a bit more antsy from the "fake" friendly deals. You could try to bribe the other civs into warring each other. Washington and Napy should be easy, not sure if it's possible to bribe someone to DOW ghandi. | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25559 Posts
On June 11 2011 03:29 Furycrab wrote: I felt bad dismantling a little bit of the specialist structure, and at first it was kicking me a bit with some growth problems, but once I trolled a few of Ghandis CS allies it gave me a lot of luxury resources and I was pleasantly surprised at how productive that bottom right city turned out. I got the feeling that Washington was getting a bit more antsy from the "fake" friendly deals. You could try to bribe the other civs into warring each other. Washington and Napy should be easy, not sure if it's possible to bribe someone to DOW ghandi. Ah, the reason I used all those specialists is that each specialist gives +2 science, regardless of what they're a specialist at. I was trying to use policy specialists coupled with science specialists to get a couple of those freedom policies that are so useful at this stage in the game, and to rush the crap out of Apollo tech, since I figured it was our last best hope of winning. I always keep a policy victory available as a OPTION, just because if it comes down to it, you can force through a policy victory with specialists and cultural CS allies-- but without key wonders such as stonehenge and the like to boost overall civ policy output, it's not easy, and it's slower than a science victory in our situation, especially with 5 active cities. | ||
|
Furycrab
Canada456 Posts
Also when I decided to build Cristo Redentor I was pretty much pressing end turn every time expecting a prompt saying that Washington or Ghandi had sniped me. I was surprised when it finished... Sucker even made me waste some science points  . (And I would have used that gold out of spite to snipe another CS)Knowing what I know now, cultural victory with Cristo Redentor + That freedom policy would have been a good choice too. (Building broadcast towers everywhere). | ||
|
Oblivion753
United States73 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25559 Posts
| ||
|
Oblivion753
United States73 Posts
On June 12 2011 05:09 Blazinghand wrote: Right now it's TrinitySC's turn, then Babyfactory, then you, then rambom. kk ty | ||
|
Kezzer
United States1268 Posts
| ||
|
SpearWrit
United States300 Posts
On June 12 2011 06:54 Kezzer wrote: so what do you guys think about this game compared to civ 4? better, worse? easier? im thinking about getting it next time it pops up on sale somewhere We try to stay away from comparisons in this thread because of the bad juju it inspires when its supposed to be about playing the game, and also because there's a Civ 4 Succession thread on the same forum. But I will say it really depends on your taste. Civ 5 is newer and all the kinks haven't been quite worked out yet, but still fun and has a different combat system (one unit per tile). Civ 4 pretty much has more of everything and as such, you have to manage more of everything. It also lets you stack military units on the same tile. So really it's up to you. There are those of us who like Civ 5 over Civ 4 and that's okay. There are people who don't like Civ 5 and prefer Civ 4 for its particular features, and that's okay. I'm sure there are some who even like both. | ||
|
TrinitySC
101 Posts
I'm not going to have time to do them for another 14 hours or so, so I won't mind if someone goes first >< | ||
|
SpearWrit
United States300 Posts
Oh god, I completely forgot I was up this weekend T_T I'm not going to have time to do them for another 14 hours or so, so I won't mind if someone goes first >< It's all good. Bumpity bump bump. Babyfactory, looks like you're up! | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25559 Posts
| ||
|
Oblivion753
United States73 Posts
| ||
|
SpearWrit
United States300 Posts
I'm in between moving apartments, but I think I have time to finish out the game tonight. I will post sometime tonight, PST. | ||
|
maryelizbethwinstead
Mexico223 Posts
| ||
|
djRAMbO
United States66 Posts
| ||
|
Furycrab
Canada456 Posts
On June 17 2011 08:00 rambomcfantastic wrote: lol rotation over and I never even got a turn ='( can't wait to see what you come up with spear Don't think was intentional, it just really hurts the momentum when one or two players in a row are no shows, so but if he's not already playing you might get a chance. All honesty this game not much left unless someone wants to go do something crazy and DOW one of the other two continents. | ||
| ||
