|
so who's the clown that said the Knicks would be in the ECF? i have a sunny resort to sell him in Ireland.
|
Are we talking about current NBA players or current nba players in their career years? Kobe's defense the last two years has not impressed me.
Handcheck rules: they say Deron would be a monster in the old rules, while undersized chris paul wouldn't do very well. You can't stop quick point guards now, but how's Chris Paul going to drive if someone's holding him back with one hand?
MJ: His athleticism was off the charts. The only player who might challenge him on defense would be lebron, because he's so big and similarly athletic.
Howard: no way. You think Pau Gasol and Bynum would have shut down Hakeem or Ewing?
Shaq, Duncan they kind of played in both eras. Monsters in any time.
Magic, Bird: obviously much better playmakers than lebron, not a good comparison.
Durant: sorry, but until he can beat defenders like Artest, he hasn't proven he would dominate a more physical era.
|
|
|
On February 09 2011 14:43 city42 wrote:Show nested quote +On February 09 2011 14:00 ricerocket wrote: Uh, do you think Isiah would do that in today's NBA? Not whether or not he could, but whether or not he would.
Yes. Show nested quote +The notion that "old school" people are tougher than today's NBA players is -- for the lack of a better word -- laughable. If you just compare two random games from the 80s and the 00s, you will see players are generally stronger and faster, not to mention lasting longer physically as they have longer careers, which are the result of better training, conditioning and medical treatments.
Why exactly is it laughable? And do you realize the contradiction you just put forth in this paragraph? First, you claim that today's players are either level or have the edge in the toughness department on the old school guys. Then, you claim that today's players last longer physically. The truth is, players of previous generations had shorter careers BECAUSE they were tougher. Do you think it helped Kevin McHale's career length expectancy when he played through 4 playoff rounds with a broken foot? Looking at a modern day warrior, how's that decision to rush back for the playoffs last year working out for Roy? Unfortunately players like Roy are becoming rarer and rarer. Show nested quote + The reason neither Isiah's response nor the hard foul would happen in the first place is that the entire culture of the league is now very different. Players realize that while they are competitors against one another, they are also colleagues and coworkers, and it is to nobody's benefit if someone breaks his neck on the court, and you do yourself no good if you come out of injuries too soon. We as fans may care about whether they are really "tough guys," but I hope everyone at least realizes deep down that those people making millions playing ball really don't give a damn what we think.
Again, wrong. The attitude of today's game is different for two main reasons: 1) Players aren't just colleagues and coworkers, they are FRIENDS. They've been playing together since they were teenagers on AAU teams, and there is very little vitriol in the league. You make it seem like the NBA just had an epiphany and decided to be friendly. I don't recall Karl Malone giving up his style of play as he continued into the 2000s, and I don't see KG trying to make friends on the court (remember, he wasn't an AAU guy). 2) Stern has been gradually making the game more finesse-based in order to sell the brand internationally. Legalizing zone defense, adding a defensive 3 second violation, creating the charge circle, etc. Show nested quote + I really believe if Rose and Isiah Thomas switched places, you would have an elite guard in Isiah today and be questioning whether he's tough enough to get stitched up and return to a regular season game like Rose did in the 80's.
I really believe the exact opposite.
First of all, quote dissecting is pretty lame.
Secondly, you have to have realized you are reinforcing what I've said throughout your post. Careers were shortened by more physical play, and since today's league has "less" physical play, current players have longer careers. Which part of it does it appear to you that proves 80s players were tougher than today's? If they had been tougher, then today's NBA players should have similar career length despite the physicality being decreased.
And how is calling them "friends, not just colleagues and coworkers" a counter argument to me saying that's why they now care about each others' well being? If anything, it makes them care more. In the 80s, guys on rival teams act like mortal enemies of one another, that's what made play without any regard to opponent's safety. How often in the 80s did you see players hold on to a guy they just intentionally fouled to prevent a layup just so the guy doesn't fall down? Hell, how often did you even see them landing a hand to an opponent to help them get up?
That's the culture change I'm referring to. Maybe it's because of Stern's rule change, maybe it's something else, but if Isiah Thomas grew up under these softer rules today, he would be a softer guy like the rest of em.
I think everybody else is seeing this simple logic. Please take a minute to think about it before you post another supposed rebuttal.
|
On February 09 2011 17:33 ricerocket wrote:Show nested quote +On February 09 2011 14:43 city42 wrote:On February 09 2011 14:00 ricerocket wrote: Uh, do you think Isiah would do that in today's NBA? Not whether or not he could, but whether or not he would.
Yes. The notion that "old school" people are tougher than today's NBA players is -- for the lack of a better word -- laughable. If you just compare two random games from the 80s and the 00s, you will see players are generally stronger and faster, not to mention lasting longer physically as they have longer careers, which are the result of better training, conditioning and medical treatments.
Why exactly is it laughable? And do you realize the contradiction you just put forth in this paragraph? First, you claim that today's players are either level or have the edge in the toughness department on the old school guys. Then, you claim that today's players last longer physically. The truth is, players of previous generations had shorter careers BECAUSE they were tougher. Do you think it helped Kevin McHale's career length expectancy when he played through 4 playoff rounds with a broken foot? Looking at a modern day warrior, how's that decision to rush back for the playoffs last year working out for Roy? Unfortunately players like Roy are becoming rarer and rarer. The reason neither Isiah's response nor the hard foul would happen in the first place is that the entire culture of the league is now very different. Players realize that while they are competitors against one another, they are also colleagues and coworkers, and it is to nobody's benefit if someone breaks his neck on the court, and you do yourself no good if you come out of injuries too soon. We as fans may care about whether they are really "tough guys," but I hope everyone at least realizes deep down that those people making millions playing ball really don't give a damn what we think.
Again, wrong. The attitude of today's game is different for two main reasons: 1) Players aren't just colleagues and coworkers, they are FRIENDS. They've been playing together since they were teenagers on AAU teams, and there is very little vitriol in the league. You make it seem like the NBA just had an epiphany and decided to be friendly. I don't recall Karl Malone giving up his style of play as he continued into the 2000s, and I don't see KG trying to make friends on the court (remember, he wasn't an AAU guy). 2) Stern has been gradually making the game more finesse-based in order to sell the brand internationally. Legalizing zone defense, adding a defensive 3 second violation, creating the charge circle, etc. I really believe if Rose and Isiah Thomas switched places, you would have an elite guard in Isiah today and be questioning whether he's tough enough to get stitched up and return to a regular season game like Rose did in the 80's.
I really believe the exact opposite. First of all, quote dissecting is pretty lame.
I don't care much about the discussion between the two of you because it's over my head but how is quote dissecting lame? It allows someone to respond exactly to the part of the post they are referring to.
It isn't as if he put what you said out of context.,...
|
Maybe he did, maybe he didn't, but "out of context," by definition, is subjectively selecting text from a whole. Many people who dissect posts do this. The original post was made as a whole, not as four isolated sections.
I'm guessing most people don't get involved in formal debates such as a courtroom cross-examination or even compete on a debate team, but you don't interrupt what someone else is saying with a statement of your own; you let them finish, then present your own well constructed argument.
|
It's a web forum not a debate team. Splitting up posts to respond point by point is normal especially since unlike irl you can see the entire argument.
|
Of course you can, it's just lame. Makes you look like you can't keep a train of thought, but as you were.
|
On February 09 2011 14:54 Judicator wrote: Ace, regarding Kevin Love, I don't necessarily agree that he's doing it all because he's on a shitty team. There's been plenty of horribly shitty teams over the past decade and still no one has put up Love's numbers, stat-whore or not, it's still pretty amazing.
Well I agree ^_^ . Getting monster rebounding numbers with a high rebounding rate usually means you're good regardless of who's around you. Likewise his scoring ability has been so much better than expected I think it's just his hard work paying off even though his back court isn't contributing on the offensive side of the floor. Minnesota is so bad I'm glad he's just trying to do everything he can to win.
|
On February 09 2011 17:33 ricerocket wrote:Show nested quote +On February 09 2011 14:43 city42 wrote:On February 09 2011 14:00 ricerocket wrote: Uh, do you think Isiah would do that in today's NBA? Not whether or not he could, but whether or not he would.
Yes. The notion that "old school" people are tougher than today's NBA players is -- for the lack of a better word -- laughable. If you just compare two random games from the 80s and the 00s, you will see players are generally stronger and faster, not to mention lasting longer physically as they have longer careers, which are the result of better training, conditioning and medical treatments.
Why exactly is it laughable? And do you realize the contradiction you just put forth in this paragraph? First, you claim that today's players are either level or have the edge in the toughness department on the old school guys. Then, you claim that today's players last longer physically. The truth is, players of previous generations had shorter careers BECAUSE they were tougher. Do you think it helped Kevin McHale's career length expectancy when he played through 4 playoff rounds with a broken foot? Looking at a modern day warrior, how's that decision to rush back for the playoffs last year working out for Roy? Unfortunately players like Roy are becoming rarer and rarer. The reason neither Isiah's response nor the hard foul would happen in the first place is that the entire culture of the league is now very different. Players realize that while they are competitors against one another, they are also colleagues and coworkers, and it is to nobody's benefit if someone breaks his neck on the court, and you do yourself no good if you come out of injuries too soon. We as fans may care about whether they are really "tough guys," but I hope everyone at least realizes deep down that those people making millions playing ball really don't give a damn what we think.
Again, wrong. The attitude of today's game is different for two main reasons: 1) Players aren't just colleagues and coworkers, they are FRIENDS. They've been playing together since they were teenagers on AAU teams, and there is very little vitriol in the league. You make it seem like the NBA just had an epiphany and decided to be friendly. I don't recall Karl Malone giving up his style of play as he continued into the 2000s, and I don't see KG trying to make friends on the court (remember, he wasn't an AAU guy). 2) Stern has been gradually making the game more finesse-based in order to sell the brand internationally. Legalizing zone defense, adding a defensive 3 second violation, creating the charge circle, etc. I really believe if Rose and Isiah Thomas switched places, you would have an elite guard in Isiah today and be questioning whether he's tough enough to get stitched up and return to a regular season game like Rose did in the 80's.
I really believe the exact opposite. First of all, quote dissecting is pretty lame. Secondly, you have to have realized you are reinforcing what I've said throughout your post. Careers were shortened by more physical play, and since today's league has "less" physical play, current players have longer careers. Which part of it does it appear to you that proves 80s players were tougher than today's? If they had been tougher, then today's NBA players should have similar career length despite the physicality being decreased. And how is calling them "friends, not just colleagues and coworkers" a counter argument to me saying that's why they now care about each others' well being? If anything, it makes them care more. In the 80s, guys on rival teams act like mortal enemies of one another, that's what made play without any regard to opponent's safety. How often in the 80s did you see players hold on to a guy they just intentionally fouled to prevent a layup just so the guy doesn't fall down? Hell, how often did you even see them landing a hand to an opponent to help them get up? That's the culture change I'm referring to. Maybe it's because of Stern's rule change, maybe it's something else, but if Isiah Thomas grew up under these softer rules today, he would be a softer guy like the rest of em. I think everybody else is seeing this simple logic. Please take a minute to think about it before you post another supposed rebuttal. No problem, I'll do it your way and write a giant blob.
Do you have an issue with reading comprehension? Nowhere did I say that careers were shortened by more physical play. I said that careers were shortened by players playing through injury. These two ideas are not synonymous. The changes to the rules have nothing at all to do with players playing through injury. Also, do you have numbers to back up a claim that there's a significant difference in career length between players in the 80s and now?
I'm just baffled how you manage to miss the point of everything. Being friends is a whole lot different from being "colleagues and coworkers." They might reach a similar end, but the means are wholly different. Realizing their status as colleagues and coworkers would involve some sort of league-wide enlightenment that occurred right around the 2004 season. In reality, basketball's popularity skyrocketed so much in the 90s that all these players were in the spotlight as kids, and they all know each other from AAU and powerhouse high schools. Saying that the players started to treat one another as colleagues proves that you don't understand the issue at hand. I think everyone else is seeing this simple logic.
You're really barking up the wrong tree with Isiah. That comment might be true about an average 80s player, but Isiah wasn't average. Why do you think KG and Artest stand out as crazy guys in a softer league? They both had crappy upbringings. It's the same story for Isiah. Growing up poor and hungry in Chicago with a pimp and a heroin addict for brothers (the addict died of AIDS) gave him the overwhelming desire to prove himself and succeed. This is a guy who, at 5'11, took swings at Bill Cartwright, Rick Mahorn, and pretty much every other big man of his era. Such behavior isn't indicative of your average 80s player, or your average player from any era.
|
On February 09 2011 17:02 igotmyown wrote: Are we talking about current NBA players or current nba players in their career years? Kobe's defense the last two years has not impressed me.
Handcheck rules: they say Deron would be a monster in the old rules, while undersized chris paul wouldn't do very well. You can't stop quick point guards now, but how's Chris Paul going to drive if someone's holding him back with one hand?
MJ: His athleticism was off the charts. The only player who might challenge him on defense would be lebron, because he's so big and similarly athletic.
Howard: no way. You think Pau Gasol and Bynum would have shut down Hakeem or Ewing?
Shaq, Duncan they kind of played in both eras. Monsters in any time.
Magic, Bird: obviously much better playmakers than lebron, not a good comparison.
Durant: sorry, but until he can beat defenders like Artest, he hasn't proven he would dominate a more physical era.
What are you smoking? What lebron does is pretty much the epitomy of an unstoppable playmaker. The only guy who can stop lebron is lebron. If he is hitting fall-away jumpers all night like he does every other night, he is untouchable on the offensive end, by any player. You have a 6'8" guy, built like a center, that can drive and finish as well as anyone in the league, insane leaping ability, and is really getting better at shooting. Comparing him to a slow, skinny white guy, or a similar size pg who couldn't even shoot is just laughable from a pure playmaker standpoint. Add his passing ability, and i really don't see what you're saying. I respect old-school players, but guys like lebron are special, and certainly are not run-of-the-mill average players. Name something they can did that Lebron certainly cannot at this time, that isn't pure shooting %, which isn't fair to bring up yet.
|
Lebron would be the bomb in the more physical era, he'd be unstopable on defense purely because of his psysical talent
|
I guess it would be unfair to Larry legend because Lebron is imba in any era especially when you have the body of a greek god.
So what's the conclusion so far? 80s guys do better in todays league? And what if you put our modern guys in the 80s?
|
On February 10 2011 01:45 city42 wrote:Show nested quote +On February 09 2011 17:33 ricerocket wrote:On February 09 2011 14:43 city42 wrote:On February 09 2011 14:00 ricerocket wrote: Uh, do you think Isiah would do that in today's NBA? Not whether or not he could, but whether or not he would.
Yes. The notion that "old school" people are tougher than today's NBA players is -- for the lack of a better word -- laughable. If you just compare two random games from the 80s and the 00s, you will see players are generally stronger and faster, not to mention lasting longer physically as they have longer careers, which are the result of better training, conditioning and medical treatments.
Why exactly is it laughable? And do you realize the contradiction you just put forth in this paragraph? First, you claim that today's players are either level or have the edge in the toughness department on the old school guys. Then, you claim that today's players last longer physically. The truth is, players of previous generations had shorter careers BECAUSE they were tougher. Do you think it helped Kevin McHale's career length expectancy when he played through 4 playoff rounds with a broken foot? Looking at a modern day warrior, how's that decision to rush back for the playoffs last year working out for Roy? Unfortunately players like Roy are becoming rarer and rarer. The reason neither Isiah's response nor the hard foul would happen in the first place is that the entire culture of the league is now very different. Players realize that while they are competitors against one another, they are also colleagues and coworkers, and it is to nobody's benefit if someone breaks his neck on the court, and you do yourself no good if you come out of injuries too soon. We as fans may care about whether they are really "tough guys," but I hope everyone at least realizes deep down that those people making millions playing ball really don't give a damn what we think.
Again, wrong. The attitude of today's game is different for two main reasons: 1) Players aren't just colleagues and coworkers, they are FRIENDS. They've been playing together since they were teenagers on AAU teams, and there is very little vitriol in the league. You make it seem like the NBA just had an epiphany and decided to be friendly. I don't recall Karl Malone giving up his style of play as he continued into the 2000s, and I don't see KG trying to make friends on the court (remember, he wasn't an AAU guy). 2) Stern has been gradually making the game more finesse-based in order to sell the brand internationally. Legalizing zone defense, adding a defensive 3 second violation, creating the charge circle, etc. I really believe if Rose and Isiah Thomas switched places, you would have an elite guard in Isiah today and be questioning whether he's tough enough to get stitched up and return to a regular season game like Rose did in the 80's.
I really believe the exact opposite. First of all, quote dissecting is pretty lame. Secondly, you have to have realized you are reinforcing what I've said throughout your post. Careers were shortened by more physical play, and since today's league has "less" physical play, current players have longer careers. Which part of it does it appear to you that proves 80s players were tougher than today's? If they had been tougher, then today's NBA players should have similar career length despite the physicality being decreased. And how is calling them "friends, not just colleagues and coworkers" a counter argument to me saying that's why they now care about each others' well being? If anything, it makes them care more. In the 80s, guys on rival teams act like mortal enemies of one another, that's what made play without any regard to opponent's safety. How often in the 80s did you see players hold on to a guy they just intentionally fouled to prevent a layup just so the guy doesn't fall down? Hell, how often did you even see them landing a hand to an opponent to help them get up? That's the culture change I'm referring to. Maybe it's because of Stern's rule change, maybe it's something else, but if Isiah Thomas grew up under these softer rules today, he would be a softer guy like the rest of em. I think everybody else is seeing this simple logic. Please take a minute to think about it before you post another supposed rebuttal. No problem, I'll do it your way and write a giant blob. Do you have an issue with reading comprehension? Nowhere did I say that careers were shortened by more physical play. I said that careers were shortened by players playing through injury. These two ideas are not synonymous. The changes to the rules have nothing at all to do with players playing through injury. Also, do you have numbers to back up a claim that there's a significant difference in career length between players in the 80s and now? I'm just baffled how you manage to miss the point of everything. Being friends is a whole lot different from being "colleagues and coworkers." They might reach a similar end, but the means are wholly different. Realizing their status as colleagues and coworkers would involve some sort of league-wide enlightenment that occurred right around the 2004 season. In reality, basketball's popularity skyrocketed so much in the 90s that all these players were in the spotlight as kids, and they all know each other from AAU and powerhouse high schools. Saying that the players started to treat one another as colleagues proves that you don't understand the issue at hand. I think everyone else is seeing this simple logic. You're really barking up the wrong tree with Isiah. That comment might be true about an average 80s player, but Isiah wasn't average. Why do you think KG and Artest stand out as crazy guys in a softer league? They both had crappy upbringings. It's the same story for Isiah. Growing up poor and hungry in Chicago with a pimp and a heroin addict for brothers (the addict died of AIDS) gave him the overwhelming desire to prove himself and succeed. This is a guy who, at 5'11, took swings at Bill Cartwright, Rick Mahorn, and pretty much every other big man of his era. Such behavior isn't indicative of your average 80s player, or your average player from any era.
Lol, why are you so insistent on differentiating relationship status between being colleagues and being friends? Have you recently reached puberty and just is really sensitive? We are talking about today's players caring more about one another's well being more than 80s' players did. And since you agree both "reach a similar end," let's stop wasting time on this moot point.
And please take more lessons in critical thinking. I said since they do care about one another's well being, this means general decrease in physicality during games, such as guys holding onto someone to both prevent a layup and him fouling hard on the floor. Please stop picking a hair between "less physical play" and "playing through injuries" and see the simple causal relationship between the two... or I can just spell it out for you I suppose: less physical play leads to less injuries in general leads to less need to play through injuries. Unless you want to argue today's players just don't play through injuries, in which case I would guess you didn't watch the playoffs last year and see Bynum playing through a bum knee for over a month after injuring it in the first round.
As for real numbers backing up today's players having longer careers, go look up a recent Bill Simmons column about stars extending their peaks. Please stop saying it's some kind of sudden enlightenment in 2004. It's not, guys Simmons listed have been playing since the 90s. The change is a gradual one, hence why someone like you who lacks the resolve or the intelligence to look beyond the surface of NBA rules and statistics would likely not to notice.
Oh, and the "crazy" Artest and Garnett would have killed a motherfucker on the court already if they were playing in the 80s, but like Isiah would have if he grew up playing in today's NBA, both have generally controlled themselves on the court. You know why? (hint: I just told you why)
|
On February 10 2011 06:10 ricerocket wrote:Show nested quote +On February 10 2011 01:45 city42 wrote:On February 09 2011 17:33 ricerocket wrote:On February 09 2011 14:43 city42 wrote:On February 09 2011 14:00 ricerocket wrote: Uh, do you think Isiah would do that in today's NBA? Not whether or not he could, but whether or not he would.
Yes. The notion that "old school" people are tougher than today's NBA players is -- for the lack of a better word -- laughable. If you just compare two random games from the 80s and the 00s, you will see players are generally stronger and faster, not to mention lasting longer physically as they have longer careers, which are the result of better training, conditioning and medical treatments.
Why exactly is it laughable? And do you realize the contradiction you just put forth in this paragraph? First, you claim that today's players are either level or have the edge in the toughness department on the old school guys. Then, you claim that today's players last longer physically. The truth is, players of previous generations had shorter careers BECAUSE they were tougher. Do you think it helped Kevin McHale's career length expectancy when he played through 4 playoff rounds with a broken foot? Looking at a modern day warrior, how's that decision to rush back for the playoffs last year working out for Roy? Unfortunately players like Roy are becoming rarer and rarer. The reason neither Isiah's response nor the hard foul would happen in the first place is that the entire culture of the league is now very different. Players realize that while they are competitors against one another, they are also colleagues and coworkers, and it is to nobody's benefit if someone breaks his neck on the court, and you do yourself no good if you come out of injuries too soon. We as fans may care about whether they are really "tough guys," but I hope everyone at least realizes deep down that those people making millions playing ball really don't give a damn what we think.
Again, wrong. The attitude of today's game is different for two main reasons: 1) Players aren't just colleagues and coworkers, they are FRIENDS. They've been playing together since they were teenagers on AAU teams, and there is very little vitriol in the league. You make it seem like the NBA just had an epiphany and decided to be friendly. I don't recall Karl Malone giving up his style of play as he continued into the 2000s, and I don't see KG trying to make friends on the court (remember, he wasn't an AAU guy). 2) Stern has been gradually making the game more finesse-based in order to sell the brand internationally. Legalizing zone defense, adding a defensive 3 second violation, creating the charge circle, etc. I really believe if Rose and Isiah Thomas switched places, you would have an elite guard in Isiah today and be questioning whether he's tough enough to get stitched up and return to a regular season game like Rose did in the 80's.
I really believe the exact opposite. First of all, quote dissecting is pretty lame. Secondly, you have to have realized you are reinforcing what I've said throughout your post. Careers were shortened by more physical play, and since today's league has "less" physical play, current players have longer careers. Which part of it does it appear to you that proves 80s players were tougher than today's? If they had been tougher, then today's NBA players should have similar career length despite the physicality being decreased. And how is calling them "friends, not just colleagues and coworkers" a counter argument to me saying that's why they now care about each others' well being? If anything, it makes them care more. In the 80s, guys on rival teams act like mortal enemies of one another, that's what made play without any regard to opponent's safety. How often in the 80s did you see players hold on to a guy they just intentionally fouled to prevent a layup just so the guy doesn't fall down? Hell, how often did you even see them landing a hand to an opponent to help them get up? That's the culture change I'm referring to. Maybe it's because of Stern's rule change, maybe it's something else, but if Isiah Thomas grew up under these softer rules today, he would be a softer guy like the rest of em. I think everybody else is seeing this simple logic. Please take a minute to think about it before you post another supposed rebuttal. No problem, I'll do it your way and write a giant blob. Do you have an issue with reading comprehension? Nowhere did I say that careers were shortened by more physical play. I said that careers were shortened by players playing through injury. These two ideas are not synonymous. The changes to the rules have nothing at all to do with players playing through injury. Also, do you have numbers to back up a claim that there's a significant difference in career length between players in the 80s and now? I'm just baffled how you manage to miss the point of everything. Being friends is a whole lot different from being "colleagues and coworkers." They might reach a similar end, but the means are wholly different. Realizing their status as colleagues and coworkers would involve some sort of league-wide enlightenment that occurred right around the 2004 season. In reality, basketball's popularity skyrocketed so much in the 90s that all these players were in the spotlight as kids, and they all know each other from AAU and powerhouse high schools. Saying that the players started to treat one another as colleagues proves that you don't understand the issue at hand. I think everyone else is seeing this simple logic. You're really barking up the wrong tree with Isiah. That comment might be true about an average 80s player, but Isiah wasn't average. Why do you think KG and Artest stand out as crazy guys in a softer league? They both had crappy upbringings. It's the same story for Isiah. Growing up poor and hungry in Chicago with a pimp and a heroin addict for brothers (the addict died of AIDS) gave him the overwhelming desire to prove himself and succeed. This is a guy who, at 5'11, took swings at Bill Cartwright, Rick Mahorn, and pretty much every other big man of his era. Such behavior isn't indicative of your average 80s player, or your average player from any era. Lol, why are you so insistent on differentiating relationship status between being colleagues and being friends? Have you recently reached puberty and just is really sensitive? We are talking about today's players caring more about one another's well being more than 80s' players did. And since you agree both "reach a similar end," let's stop wasting time on this moot point. And please take more lessons in critical thinking. I said since they do care about one another's well being, this means general decrease in physicality during games, such as guys holding onto someone to both prevent a layup and him fouling hard on the floor. Please stop picking a hair between "less physical play" and "playing through injuries" and see the simple causal relationship between the two... or I can just spell it out for you I suppose: less physical play leads to less injuries in general leads to less need to play through injuries. Unless you want to argue today's players just don't play through injuries, in which case I would guess you didn't watch the playoffs last year and see Bynum playing through a bum knee for over a month after injuring it in the first round. As for real numbers backing up today's players having longer careers, go look up a recent Bill Simmons column about stars extending their peaks. Please stop saying it's some kind of sudden enlightenment in 2004. It's not, guys Simmons listed have been playing since the 90s. The change is a gradual one, hence why someone like you who lacks the resolve or the intelligence to look beyond the surface of NBA rules and statistics would likely not to notice. Oh, and the "crazy" Artest and Garnett would have killed a motherfucker on the court already if they were playing in the 80s, but like Isiah would have if he grew up playing in today's NBA, both have generally controlled themselves on the court. You know why? (hint: I just told you why)
If you're gonna post like that just GTFO. If you honestly though Isiah would be a cool dude playing in today's NBA...lol, you clearly do not know Isiah. He's Artest before Artest, or rather Artest is kind of like him with less control (prior to counseling). Most of his teammates said something along the lines of he was cool until something set him off; whatever the trigger was, it was just overwhelming at that point.
|
On February 10 2011 06:41 Judicator wrote:Show nested quote +On February 10 2011 06:10 ricerocket wrote:On February 10 2011 01:45 city42 wrote:On February 09 2011 17:33 ricerocket wrote:On February 09 2011 14:43 city42 wrote:On February 09 2011 14:00 ricerocket wrote: Uh, do you think Isiah would do that in today's NBA? Not whether or not he could, but whether or not he would.
Yes. The notion that "old school" people are tougher than today's NBA players is -- for the lack of a better word -- laughable. If you just compare two random games from the 80s and the 00s, you will see players are generally stronger and faster, not to mention lasting longer physically as they have longer careers, which are the result of better training, conditioning and medical treatments.
Why exactly is it laughable? And do you realize the contradiction you just put forth in this paragraph? First, you claim that today's players are either level or have the edge in the toughness department on the old school guys. Then, you claim that today's players last longer physically. The truth is, players of previous generations had shorter careers BECAUSE they were tougher. Do you think it helped Kevin McHale's career length expectancy when he played through 4 playoff rounds with a broken foot? Looking at a modern day warrior, how's that decision to rush back for the playoffs last year working out for Roy? Unfortunately players like Roy are becoming rarer and rarer. The reason neither Isiah's response nor the hard foul would happen in the first place is that the entire culture of the league is now very different. Players realize that while they are competitors against one another, they are also colleagues and coworkers, and it is to nobody's benefit if someone breaks his neck on the court, and you do yourself no good if you come out of injuries too soon. We as fans may care about whether they are really "tough guys," but I hope everyone at least realizes deep down that those people making millions playing ball really don't give a damn what we think.
Again, wrong. The attitude of today's game is different for two main reasons: 1) Players aren't just colleagues and coworkers, they are FRIENDS. They've been playing together since they were teenagers on AAU teams, and there is very little vitriol in the league. You make it seem like the NBA just had an epiphany and decided to be friendly. I don't recall Karl Malone giving up his style of play as he continued into the 2000s, and I don't see KG trying to make friends on the court (remember, he wasn't an AAU guy). 2) Stern has been gradually making the game more finesse-based in order to sell the brand internationally. Legalizing zone defense, adding a defensive 3 second violation, creating the charge circle, etc. I really believe if Rose and Isiah Thomas switched places, you would have an elite guard in Isiah today and be questioning whether he's tough enough to get stitched up and return to a regular season game like Rose did in the 80's.
I really believe the exact opposite. First of all, quote dissecting is pretty lame. Secondly, you have to have realized you are reinforcing what I've said throughout your post. Careers were shortened by more physical play, and since today's league has "less" physical play, current players have longer careers. Which part of it does it appear to you that proves 80s players were tougher than today's? If they had been tougher, then today's NBA players should have similar career length despite the physicality being decreased. And how is calling them "friends, not just colleagues and coworkers" a counter argument to me saying that's why they now care about each others' well being? If anything, it makes them care more. In the 80s, guys on rival teams act like mortal enemies of one another, that's what made play without any regard to opponent's safety. How often in the 80s did you see players hold on to a guy they just intentionally fouled to prevent a layup just so the guy doesn't fall down? Hell, how often did you even see them landing a hand to an opponent to help them get up? That's the culture change I'm referring to. Maybe it's because of Stern's rule change, maybe it's something else, but if Isiah Thomas grew up under these softer rules today, he would be a softer guy like the rest of em. I think everybody else is seeing this simple logic. Please take a minute to think about it before you post another supposed rebuttal. No problem, I'll do it your way and write a giant blob. Do you have an issue with reading comprehension? Nowhere did I say that careers were shortened by more physical play. I said that careers were shortened by players playing through injury. These two ideas are not synonymous. The changes to the rules have nothing at all to do with players playing through injury. Also, do you have numbers to back up a claim that there's a significant difference in career length between players in the 80s and now? I'm just baffled how you manage to miss the point of everything. Being friends is a whole lot different from being "colleagues and coworkers." They might reach a similar end, but the means are wholly different. Realizing their status as colleagues and coworkers would involve some sort of league-wide enlightenment that occurred right around the 2004 season. In reality, basketball's popularity skyrocketed so much in the 90s that all these players were in the spotlight as kids, and they all know each other from AAU and powerhouse high schools. Saying that the players started to treat one another as colleagues proves that you don't understand the issue at hand. I think everyone else is seeing this simple logic. You're really barking up the wrong tree with Isiah. That comment might be true about an average 80s player, but Isiah wasn't average. Why do you think KG and Artest stand out as crazy guys in a softer league? They both had crappy upbringings. It's the same story for Isiah. Growing up poor and hungry in Chicago with a pimp and a heroin addict for brothers (the addict died of AIDS) gave him the overwhelming desire to prove himself and succeed. This is a guy who, at 5'11, took swings at Bill Cartwright, Rick Mahorn, and pretty much every other big man of his era. Such behavior isn't indicative of your average 80s player, or your average player from any era. Lol, why are you so insistent on differentiating relationship status between being colleagues and being friends? Have you recently reached puberty and just is really sensitive? We are talking about today's players caring more about one another's well being more than 80s' players did. And since you agree both "reach a similar end," let's stop wasting time on this moot point. And please take more lessons in critical thinking. I said since they do care about one another's well being, this means general decrease in physicality during games, such as guys holding onto someone to both prevent a layup and him fouling hard on the floor. Please stop picking a hair between "less physical play" and "playing through injuries" and see the simple causal relationship between the two... or I can just spell it out for you I suppose: less physical play leads to less injuries in general leads to less need to play through injuries. Unless you want to argue today's players just don't play through injuries, in which case I would guess you didn't watch the playoffs last year and see Bynum playing through a bum knee for over a month after injuring it in the first round. As for real numbers backing up today's players having longer careers, go look up a recent Bill Simmons column about stars extending their peaks. Please stop saying it's some kind of sudden enlightenment in 2004. It's not, guys Simmons listed have been playing since the 90s. The change is a gradual one, hence why someone like you who lacks the resolve or the intelligence to look beyond the surface of NBA rules and statistics would likely not to notice. Oh, and the "crazy" Artest and Garnett would have killed a motherfucker on the court already if they were playing in the 80s, but like Isiah would have if he grew up playing in today's NBA, both have generally controlled themselves on the court. You know why? (hint: I just told you why) If you're gonna post like that just GTFO. If you honestly though Isiah would be a cool dude playing in today's NBA...lol, you clearly do not know Isiah. He's Artest before Artest, or rather Artest is kind of like him with less control (prior to counseling). Most of his teammates said something along the lines of he was cool until something set him off; whatever the trigger was, it was just overwhelming at that point.
... Thanks for repeating what I said.
|
On February 10 2011 06:44 ricerocket wrote:Show nested quote +On February 10 2011 06:41 Judicator wrote:On February 10 2011 06:10 ricerocket wrote:On February 10 2011 01:45 city42 wrote:On February 09 2011 17:33 ricerocket wrote:On February 09 2011 14:43 city42 wrote:On February 09 2011 14:00 ricerocket wrote: Uh, do you think Isiah would do that in today's NBA? Not whether or not he could, but whether or not he would.
Yes. The notion that "old school" people are tougher than today's NBA players is -- for the lack of a better word -- laughable. If you just compare two random games from the 80s and the 00s, you will see players are generally stronger and faster, not to mention lasting longer physically as they have longer careers, which are the result of better training, conditioning and medical treatments.
Why exactly is it laughable? And do you realize the contradiction you just put forth in this paragraph? First, you claim that today's players are either level or have the edge in the toughness department on the old school guys. Then, you claim that today's players last longer physically. The truth is, players of previous generations had shorter careers BECAUSE they were tougher. Do you think it helped Kevin McHale's career length expectancy when he played through 4 playoff rounds with a broken foot? Looking at a modern day warrior, how's that decision to rush back for the playoffs last year working out for Roy? Unfortunately players like Roy are becoming rarer and rarer. The reason neither Isiah's response nor the hard foul would happen in the first place is that the entire culture of the league is now very different. Players realize that while they are competitors against one another, they are also colleagues and coworkers, and it is to nobody's benefit if someone breaks his neck on the court, and you do yourself no good if you come out of injuries too soon. We as fans may care about whether they are really "tough guys," but I hope everyone at least realizes deep down that those people making millions playing ball really don't give a damn what we think.
Again, wrong. The attitude of today's game is different for two main reasons: 1) Players aren't just colleagues and coworkers, they are FRIENDS. They've been playing together since they were teenagers on AAU teams, and there is very little vitriol in the league. You make it seem like the NBA just had an epiphany and decided to be friendly. I don't recall Karl Malone giving up his style of play as he continued into the 2000s, and I don't see KG trying to make friends on the court (remember, he wasn't an AAU guy). 2) Stern has been gradually making the game more finesse-based in order to sell the brand internationally. Legalizing zone defense, adding a defensive 3 second violation, creating the charge circle, etc. I really believe if Rose and Isiah Thomas switched places, you would have an elite guard in Isiah today and be questioning whether he's tough enough to get stitched up and return to a regular season game like Rose did in the 80's.
I really believe the exact opposite. First of all, quote dissecting is pretty lame. Secondly, you have to have realized you are reinforcing what I've said throughout your post. Careers were shortened by more physical play, and since today's league has "less" physical play, current players have longer careers. Which part of it does it appear to you that proves 80s players were tougher than today's? If they had been tougher, then today's NBA players should have similar career length despite the physicality being decreased. And how is calling them "friends, not just colleagues and coworkers" a counter argument to me saying that's why they now care about each others' well being? If anything, it makes them care more. In the 80s, guys on rival teams act like mortal enemies of one another, that's what made play without any regard to opponent's safety. How often in the 80s did you see players hold on to a guy they just intentionally fouled to prevent a layup just so the guy doesn't fall down? Hell, how often did you even see them landing a hand to an opponent to help them get up? That's the culture change I'm referring to. Maybe it's because of Stern's rule change, maybe it's something else, but if Isiah Thomas grew up under these softer rules today, he would be a softer guy like the rest of em. I think everybody else is seeing this simple logic. Please take a minute to think about it before you post another supposed rebuttal. No problem, I'll do it your way and write a giant blob. Do you have an issue with reading comprehension? Nowhere did I say that careers were shortened by more physical play. I said that careers were shortened by players playing through injury. These two ideas are not synonymous. The changes to the rules have nothing at all to do with players playing through injury. Also, do you have numbers to back up a claim that there's a significant difference in career length between players in the 80s and now? I'm just baffled how you manage to miss the point of everything. Being friends is a whole lot different from being "colleagues and coworkers." They might reach a similar end, but the means are wholly different. Realizing their status as colleagues and coworkers would involve some sort of league-wide enlightenment that occurred right around the 2004 season. In reality, basketball's popularity skyrocketed so much in the 90s that all these players were in the spotlight as kids, and they all know each other from AAU and powerhouse high schools. Saying that the players started to treat one another as colleagues proves that you don't understand the issue at hand. I think everyone else is seeing this simple logic. You're really barking up the wrong tree with Isiah. That comment might be true about an average 80s player, but Isiah wasn't average. Why do you think KG and Artest stand out as crazy guys in a softer league? They both had crappy upbringings. It's the same story for Isiah. Growing up poor and hungry in Chicago with a pimp and a heroin addict for brothers (the addict died of AIDS) gave him the overwhelming desire to prove himself and succeed. This is a guy who, at 5'11, took swings at Bill Cartwright, Rick Mahorn, and pretty much every other big man of his era. Such behavior isn't indicative of your average 80s player, or your average player from any era. Lol, why are you so insistent on differentiating relationship status between being colleagues and being friends? Have you recently reached puberty and just is really sensitive? We are talking about today's players caring more about one another's well being more than 80s' players did. And since you agree both "reach a similar end," let's stop wasting time on this moot point. And please take more lessons in critical thinking. I said since they do care about one another's well being, this means general decrease in physicality during games, such as guys holding onto someone to both prevent a layup and him fouling hard on the floor. Please stop picking a hair between "less physical play" and "playing through injuries" and see the simple causal relationship between the two... or I can just spell it out for you I suppose: less physical play leads to less injuries in general leads to less need to play through injuries. Unless you want to argue today's players just don't play through injuries, in which case I would guess you didn't watch the playoffs last year and see Bynum playing through a bum knee for over a month after injuring it in the first round. As for real numbers backing up today's players having longer careers, go look up a recent Bill Simmons column about stars extending their peaks. Please stop saying it's some kind of sudden enlightenment in 2004. It's not, guys Simmons listed have been playing since the 90s. The change is a gradual one, hence why someone like you who lacks the resolve or the intelligence to look beyond the surface of NBA rules and statistics would likely not to notice. Oh, and the "crazy" Artest and Garnett would have killed a motherfucker on the court already if they were playing in the 80s, but like Isiah would have if he grew up playing in today's NBA, both have generally controlled themselves on the court. You know why? (hint: I just told you why) If you're gonna post like that just GTFO. If you honestly though Isiah would be a cool dude playing in today's NBA...lol, you clearly do not know Isiah. He's Artest before Artest, or rather Artest is kind of like him with less control (prior to counseling). Most of his teammates said something along the lines of he was cool until something set him off; whatever the trigger was, it was just overwhelming at that point. ... Thanks for repeating what I said.
What? Yet, you still claim to read posts carefully enough to understand them?
Hint Edit: Thanks for proving city42's original point about you failing at reading comprehension.
|
This isn't the first time he's been guilty of that
|
If you can't see how you just repeated my craziness comparison between Artest and Isiah, then you should just open another NBA thread for illiterates. Looks like you'll have peers plenty.
|
Or maybe you already intended that with this thread, then I should probably just back out and kick myself for being down at you guys' level to even join the "discussion."
Am I in the Idiocracy alternate universe here? LOL
|
|
|
|
|
|