• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 07:45
CEST 13:45
KST 20:45
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Serral wins HomeStory Cup 2914Serral wins Maestros of the Game 243ByuL, and the Limitations of Standard Play3Team Liquid Map Contest #22: Results and Winners7Code S Season 2 (2026): RO4 and Finals Preview12
Community News
ZeroSpace Early Access is Now Live!16Weekly Cups (July 13-19): Terran & Protoss rise; Zerg falters2Balance hotfix patch 5.0.16b (July 16)84Reynor: GSL Loss Wasn't About Preparation Format16[IPSL] Spring 2026 Grand Finals - This Weekend!18
StarCraft 2
General
August World Ranking Watchlist: Serral back to #1? How would you feel about frequent/monthly balance patches for SC2? Balance hotfix patch 5.0.16b (July 16) Clem: "I don't have that much hope in Blizzard" Weekly Cups (July 13-19): Terran & Protoss rise; Zerg falters
Tourneys
RSL Revival: Season 6 - Qualifiers and Main Event Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2) WardiTV Summer Cup 2026 GSL CK #5 Race War HomeStory Cup 29
Strategy
[G] Having the right mentality to improve
Custom Maps
[M] (2) Industrial Park New Map Maker - Looking for Advice - Love or Hate
External Content
Mutation # 535 Assembly of Vengeance The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 534 Burning Evacuation Mutation # 533 Die Together
Brood War
General
Animated Gateway BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BW General Discussion HORROR STARCRAFT MOVIE How Famous was FlaSh before his Debut?
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [IPSL] Spring 2026 Grand Finals - This Weekend! Escore Tournament - Season 3 Small VOD Thread 2.0
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers PvT advise for noobs Fighting Spirit mining rates Creating a full chart of Zerg builds
Other Games
General Games
ZeroSpace Early Access is Now Live! Path of Exile General RTS Discussion Thread ZeroSpace at Steam NextFest - Last free demo Nintendo Switch Thread
Dota 2
Looking for a Dota Mentor Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
TSM pausing esports and CLG Dead
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Power Rank NeO.D_StephenKing vs This Guy From 1 Million Dance TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Artificial Intelligence Thread How to buy a book - shipping from Korea to Europe The Games Industry And ATVI
Fan Clubs
The IdrA Fan Club The HerO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread Series you have seen recently... Movie Discussion! [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 Formula 1 Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023 McBoner: A hockey love story
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread Simple Questions Simple Answers FPS when play League Of Legend on laptop
TL Community
Northern Ireland Global Starcraft The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Hello guys!
LIN1s
Role of Gaming on Mental Hea…
TrAiDoS
ASL S22 English Commentary…
namkraft
Poker (part 2)
Nebuchad
An Exploration of th…
waywardstrategy
ramps on octagon
StaticNine
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 11750 users

NBA 2010-2011 Season - Page 75

Forum Index > General Games
Post a Reply
Prev 1 73 74 75 76 77 160 Next
FQD1911
Profile Joined April 2010
83 Posts
February 09 2011 07:09 GMT
#1481
so who's the clown that said the Knicks would be in the ECF? i have a sunny resort to sell him in Ireland.
Close only counts in horseshoes, hand grenades, and unwanted pregnancies
igotmyown
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
United States4291 Posts
February 09 2011 08:02 GMT
#1482
Are we talking about current NBA players or current nba players in their career years? Kobe's defense the last two years has not impressed me.

Handcheck rules: they say Deron would be a monster in the old rules, while undersized chris paul wouldn't do very well. You can't stop quick point guards now, but how's Chris Paul going to drive if someone's holding him back with one hand?

MJ: His athleticism was off the charts. The only player who might challenge him on defense would be lebron, because he's so big and similarly athletic.

Howard: no way. You think Pau Gasol and Bynum would have shut down Hakeem or Ewing?

Shaq, Duncan they kind of played in both eras. Monsters in any time.

Magic, Bird: obviously much better playmakers than lebron, not a good comparison.

Durant: sorry, but until he can beat defenders like Artest, he hasn't proven he would dominate a more physical era.
igotmyown
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
United States4291 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-02-09 11:19:44
February 09 2011 08:17 GMT
#1483
Kevin Love vs Dennis Rodman: who gets the board?

Kevin Love vs The Round Mound of Rebound: who gets the board?

Edit:
Chuck vs Chuck Norris?!?
http://www.nba.com/video/channels/originals/2011/02/08/20110208_thejump_c.nba/
ricerocket
Profile Joined May 2010
154 Posts
February 09 2011 08:33 GMT
#1484
On February 09 2011 14:43 city42 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 09 2011 14:00 ricerocket wrote:
Uh, do you think Isiah would do that in today's NBA? Not whether or not he could, but whether or not he would.

Yes.

Show nested quote +
The notion that "old school" people are tougher than today's NBA players is -- for the lack of a better word -- laughable. If you just compare two random games from the 80s and the 00s, you will see players are generally stronger and faster, not to mention lasting longer physically as they have longer careers, which are the result of better training, conditioning and medical treatments.

Why exactly is it laughable? And do you realize the contradiction you just put forth in this paragraph? First, you claim that today's players are either level or have the edge in the toughness department on the old school guys. Then, you claim that today's players last longer physically. The truth is, players of previous generations had shorter careers BECAUSE they were tougher. Do you think it helped Kevin McHale's career length expectancy when he played through 4 playoff rounds with a broken foot? Looking at a modern day warrior, how's that decision to rush back for the playoffs last year working out for Roy? Unfortunately players like Roy are becoming rarer and rarer.

Show nested quote +

The reason neither Isiah's response nor the hard foul would happen in the first place is that the entire culture of the league is now very different. Players realize that while they are competitors against one another, they are also colleagues and coworkers, and it is to nobody's benefit if someone breaks his neck on the court, and you do yourself no good if you come out of injuries too soon. We as fans may care about whether they are really "tough guys," but I hope everyone at least realizes deep down that those people making millions playing ball really don't give a damn what we think.

Again, wrong. The attitude of today's game is different for two main reasons:

1) Players aren't just colleagues and coworkers, they are FRIENDS. They've been playing together since they were teenagers on AAU teams, and there is very little vitriol in the league. You make it seem like the NBA just had an epiphany and decided to be friendly. I don't recall Karl Malone giving up his style of play as he continued into the 2000s, and I don't see KG trying to make friends on the court (remember, he wasn't an AAU guy).
2) Stern has been gradually making the game more finesse-based in order to sell the brand internationally. Legalizing zone defense, adding a defensive 3 second violation, creating the charge circle, etc.

Show nested quote +

I really believe if Rose and Isiah Thomas switched places, you would have an elite guard in Isiah today and be questioning whether he's tough enough to get stitched up and return to a regular season game like Rose did in the 80's.

I really believe the exact opposite.


First of all, quote dissecting is pretty lame.

Secondly, you have to have realized you are reinforcing what I've said throughout your post. Careers were shortened by more physical play, and since today's league has "less" physical play, current players have longer careers. Which part of it does it appear to you that proves 80s players were tougher than today's? If they had been tougher, then today's NBA players should have similar career length despite the physicality being decreased.

And how is calling them "friends, not just colleagues and coworkers" a counter argument to me saying that's why they now care about each others' well being? If anything, it makes them care more. In the 80s, guys on rival teams act like mortal enemies of one another, that's what made play without any regard to opponent's safety. How often in the 80s did you see players hold on to a guy they just intentionally fouled to prevent a layup just so the guy doesn't fall down? Hell, how often did you even see them landing a hand to an opponent to help them get up?

That's the culture change I'm referring to. Maybe it's because of Stern's rule change, maybe it's something else, but if Isiah Thomas grew up under these softer rules today, he would be a softer guy like the rest of em.

I think everybody else is seeing this simple logic. Please take a minute to think about it before you post another supposed rebuttal.
Jayme
Profile Blog Joined February 2009
United States5866 Posts
February 09 2011 08:53 GMT
#1485
On February 09 2011 17:33 ricerocket wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 09 2011 14:43 city42 wrote:
On February 09 2011 14:00 ricerocket wrote:
Uh, do you think Isiah would do that in today's NBA? Not whether or not he could, but whether or not he would.

Yes.

The notion that "old school" people are tougher than today's NBA players is -- for the lack of a better word -- laughable. If you just compare two random games from the 80s and the 00s, you will see players are generally stronger and faster, not to mention lasting longer physically as they have longer careers, which are the result of better training, conditioning and medical treatments.

Why exactly is it laughable? And do you realize the contradiction you just put forth in this paragraph? First, you claim that today's players are either level or have the edge in the toughness department on the old school guys. Then, you claim that today's players last longer physically. The truth is, players of previous generations had shorter careers BECAUSE they were tougher. Do you think it helped Kevin McHale's career length expectancy when he played through 4 playoff rounds with a broken foot? Looking at a modern day warrior, how's that decision to rush back for the playoffs last year working out for Roy? Unfortunately players like Roy are becoming rarer and rarer.


The reason neither Isiah's response nor the hard foul would happen in the first place is that the entire culture of the league is now very different. Players realize that while they are competitors against one another, they are also colleagues and coworkers, and it is to nobody's benefit if someone breaks his neck on the court, and you do yourself no good if you come out of injuries too soon. We as fans may care about whether they are really "tough guys," but I hope everyone at least realizes deep down that those people making millions playing ball really don't give a damn what we think.

Again, wrong. The attitude of today's game is different for two main reasons:

1) Players aren't just colleagues and coworkers, they are FRIENDS. They've been playing together since they were teenagers on AAU teams, and there is very little vitriol in the league. You make it seem like the NBA just had an epiphany and decided to be friendly. I don't recall Karl Malone giving up his style of play as he continued into the 2000s, and I don't see KG trying to make friends on the court (remember, he wasn't an AAU guy).
2) Stern has been gradually making the game more finesse-based in order to sell the brand internationally. Legalizing zone defense, adding a defensive 3 second violation, creating the charge circle, etc.


I really believe if Rose and Isiah Thomas switched places, you would have an elite guard in Isiah today and be questioning whether he's tough enough to get stitched up and return to a regular season game like Rose did in the 80's.

I really believe the exact opposite.


First of all, quote dissecting is pretty lame.




I don't care much about the discussion between the two of you because it's over my head but how is quote dissecting lame? It allows someone to respond exactly to the part of the post they are referring to.

It isn't as if he put what you said out of context.,...
Python is garbage, number 1 advocate of getting rid of it.
ricerocket
Profile Joined May 2010
154 Posts
February 09 2011 09:14 GMT
#1486
Maybe he did, maybe he didn't, but "out of context," by definition, is subjectively selecting text from a whole. Many people who dissect posts do this. The original post was made as a whole, not as four isolated sections.

I'm guessing most people don't get involved in formal debates such as a courtroom cross-examination or even compete on a debate team, but you don't interrupt what someone else is saying with a statement of your own; you let them finish, then present your own well constructed argument.
Ace
Profile Blog Joined October 2002
United States16096 Posts
February 09 2011 09:34 GMT
#1487
It's a web forum not a debate team. Splitting up posts to respond point by point is normal especially since unlike irl you can see the entire argument.
Math me up, scumboi. - Acrofales
ricerocket
Profile Joined May 2010
154 Posts
February 09 2011 09:38 GMT
#1488
Of course you can, it's just lame. Makes you look like you can't keep a train of thought, but as you were.
Ace
Profile Blog Joined October 2002
United States16096 Posts
February 09 2011 10:09 GMT
#1489
On February 09 2011 14:54 Judicator wrote:
Ace, regarding Kevin Love, I don't necessarily agree that he's doing it all because he's on a shitty team. There's been plenty of horribly shitty teams over the past decade and still no one has put up Love's numbers, stat-whore or not, it's still pretty amazing.


Well I agree ^_^ . Getting monster rebounding numbers with a high rebounding rate usually means you're good regardless of who's around you. Likewise his scoring ability has been so much better than expected I think it's just his hard work paying off even though his back court isn't contributing on the offensive side of the floor. Minnesota is so bad I'm glad he's just trying to do everything he can to win.
Math me up, scumboi. - Acrofales
city42
Profile Joined October 2007
1656 Posts
February 09 2011 16:45 GMT
#1490
On February 09 2011 17:33 ricerocket wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 09 2011 14:43 city42 wrote:
On February 09 2011 14:00 ricerocket wrote:
Uh, do you think Isiah would do that in today's NBA? Not whether or not he could, but whether or not he would.

Yes.

The notion that "old school" people are tougher than today's NBA players is -- for the lack of a better word -- laughable. If you just compare two random games from the 80s and the 00s, you will see players are generally stronger and faster, not to mention lasting longer physically as they have longer careers, which are the result of better training, conditioning and medical treatments.

Why exactly is it laughable? And do you realize the contradiction you just put forth in this paragraph? First, you claim that today's players are either level or have the edge in the toughness department on the old school guys. Then, you claim that today's players last longer physically. The truth is, players of previous generations had shorter careers BECAUSE they were tougher. Do you think it helped Kevin McHale's career length expectancy when he played through 4 playoff rounds with a broken foot? Looking at a modern day warrior, how's that decision to rush back for the playoffs last year working out for Roy? Unfortunately players like Roy are becoming rarer and rarer.


The reason neither Isiah's response nor the hard foul would happen in the first place is that the entire culture of the league is now very different. Players realize that while they are competitors against one another, they are also colleagues and coworkers, and it is to nobody's benefit if someone breaks his neck on the court, and you do yourself no good if you come out of injuries too soon. We as fans may care about whether they are really "tough guys," but I hope everyone at least realizes deep down that those people making millions playing ball really don't give a damn what we think.

Again, wrong. The attitude of today's game is different for two main reasons:

1) Players aren't just colleagues and coworkers, they are FRIENDS. They've been playing together since they were teenagers on AAU teams, and there is very little vitriol in the league. You make it seem like the NBA just had an epiphany and decided to be friendly. I don't recall Karl Malone giving up his style of play as he continued into the 2000s, and I don't see KG trying to make friends on the court (remember, he wasn't an AAU guy).
2) Stern has been gradually making the game more finesse-based in order to sell the brand internationally. Legalizing zone defense, adding a defensive 3 second violation, creating the charge circle, etc.


I really believe if Rose and Isiah Thomas switched places, you would have an elite guard in Isiah today and be questioning whether he's tough enough to get stitched up and return to a regular season game like Rose did in the 80's.

I really believe the exact opposite.


First of all, quote dissecting is pretty lame.

Secondly, you have to have realized you are reinforcing what I've said throughout your post. Careers were shortened by more physical play, and since today's league has "less" physical play, current players have longer careers. Which part of it does it appear to you that proves 80s players were tougher than today's? If they had been tougher, then today's NBA players should have similar career length despite the physicality being decreased.

And how is calling them "friends, not just colleagues and coworkers" a counter argument to me saying that's why they now care about each others' well being? If anything, it makes them care more. In the 80s, guys on rival teams act like mortal enemies of one another, that's what made play without any regard to opponent's safety. How often in the 80s did you see players hold on to a guy they just intentionally fouled to prevent a layup just so the guy doesn't fall down? Hell, how often did you even see them landing a hand to an opponent to help them get up?

That's the culture change I'm referring to. Maybe it's because of Stern's rule change, maybe it's something else, but if Isiah Thomas grew up under these softer rules today, he would be a softer guy like the rest of em.

I think everybody else is seeing this simple logic. Please take a minute to think about it before you post another supposed rebuttal.

No problem, I'll do it your way and write a giant blob.

Do you have an issue with reading comprehension? Nowhere did I say that careers were shortened by more physical play. I said that careers were shortened by players playing through injury. These two ideas are not synonymous. The changes to the rules have nothing at all to do with players playing through injury. Also, do you have numbers to back up a claim that there's a significant difference in career length between players in the 80s and now?

I'm just baffled how you manage to miss the point of everything. Being friends is a whole lot different from being "colleagues and coworkers." They might reach a similar end, but the means are wholly different. Realizing their status as colleagues and coworkers would involve some sort of league-wide enlightenment that occurred right around the 2004 season. In reality, basketball's popularity skyrocketed so much in the 90s that all these players were in the spotlight as kids, and they all know each other from AAU and powerhouse high schools. Saying that the players started to treat one another as colleagues proves that you don't understand the issue at hand. I think everyone else is seeing this simple logic.

You're really barking up the wrong tree with Isiah. That comment might be true about an average 80s player, but Isiah wasn't average. Why do you think KG and Artest stand out as crazy guys in a softer league? They both had crappy upbringings. It's the same story for Isiah. Growing up poor and hungry in Chicago with a pimp and a heroin addict for brothers (the addict died of AIDS) gave him the overwhelming desire to prove himself and succeed. This is a guy who, at 5'11, took swings at Bill Cartwright, Rick Mahorn, and pretty much every other big man of his era. Such behavior isn't indicative of your average 80s player, or your average player from any era.
Sm3agol
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
United States2055 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-02-09 17:02:10
February 09 2011 16:59 GMT
#1491
On February 09 2011 17:02 igotmyown wrote:
Are we talking about current NBA players or current nba players in their career years? Kobe's defense the last two years has not impressed me.

Handcheck rules: they say Deron would be a monster in the old rules, while undersized chris paul wouldn't do very well. You can't stop quick point guards now, but how's Chris Paul going to drive if someone's holding him back with one hand?

MJ: His athleticism was off the charts. The only player who might challenge him on defense would be lebron, because he's so big and similarly athletic.

Howard: no way. You think Pau Gasol and Bynum would have shut down Hakeem or Ewing?

Shaq, Duncan they kind of played in both eras. Monsters in any time.

Magic, Bird: obviously much better playmakers than lebron, not a good comparison.

Durant: sorry, but until he can beat defenders like Artest, he hasn't proven he would dominate a more physical era.


What are you smoking? What lebron does is pretty much the epitomy of an unstoppable playmaker. The only guy who can stop lebron is lebron. If he is hitting fall-away jumpers all night like he does every other night, he is untouchable on the offensive end, by any player. You have a 6'8" guy, built like a center, that can drive and finish as well as anyone in the league, insane leaping ability, and is really getting better at shooting. Comparing him to a slow, skinny white guy, or a similar size pg who couldn't even shoot is just laughable from a pure playmaker standpoint. Add his passing ability, and i really don't see what you're saying. I respect old-school players, but guys like lebron are special, and certainly are not run-of-the-mill average players. Name something they can did that Lebron certainly cannot at this time, that isn't pure shooting %, which isn't fair to bring up yet.
matko5
Profile Joined April 2010
Croatia385 Posts
February 09 2011 17:19 GMT
#1492
Lebron would be the bomb in the more physical era, he'd be unstopable on defense purely because of his psysical talent
Disi gazda
BalliSLife
Profile Blog Joined September 2008
1339 Posts
February 09 2011 17:42 GMT
#1493
I guess it would be unfair to Larry legend because Lebron is imba in any era especially when you have the body of a greek god.

So what's the conclusion so far? 80s guys do better in todays league? And what if you put our modern guys in the 80s?
Ya well, at least I don't fuck a fleshlight with a condom on and cry at the same time.
ricerocket
Profile Joined May 2010
154 Posts
February 09 2011 21:10 GMT
#1494
On February 10 2011 01:45 city42 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 09 2011 17:33 ricerocket wrote:
On February 09 2011 14:43 city42 wrote:
On February 09 2011 14:00 ricerocket wrote:
Uh, do you think Isiah would do that in today's NBA? Not whether or not he could, but whether or not he would.

Yes.

The notion that "old school" people are tougher than today's NBA players is -- for the lack of a better word -- laughable. If you just compare two random games from the 80s and the 00s, you will see players are generally stronger and faster, not to mention lasting longer physically as they have longer careers, which are the result of better training, conditioning and medical treatments.

Why exactly is it laughable? And do you realize the contradiction you just put forth in this paragraph? First, you claim that today's players are either level or have the edge in the toughness department on the old school guys. Then, you claim that today's players last longer physically. The truth is, players of previous generations had shorter careers BECAUSE they were tougher. Do you think it helped Kevin McHale's career length expectancy when he played through 4 playoff rounds with a broken foot? Looking at a modern day warrior, how's that decision to rush back for the playoffs last year working out for Roy? Unfortunately players like Roy are becoming rarer and rarer.


The reason neither Isiah's response nor the hard foul would happen in the first place is that the entire culture of the league is now very different. Players realize that while they are competitors against one another, they are also colleagues and coworkers, and it is to nobody's benefit if someone breaks his neck on the court, and you do yourself no good if you come out of injuries too soon. We as fans may care about whether they are really "tough guys," but I hope everyone at least realizes deep down that those people making millions playing ball really don't give a damn what we think.

Again, wrong. The attitude of today's game is different for two main reasons:

1) Players aren't just colleagues and coworkers, they are FRIENDS. They've been playing together since they were teenagers on AAU teams, and there is very little vitriol in the league. You make it seem like the NBA just had an epiphany and decided to be friendly. I don't recall Karl Malone giving up his style of play as he continued into the 2000s, and I don't see KG trying to make friends on the court (remember, he wasn't an AAU guy).
2) Stern has been gradually making the game more finesse-based in order to sell the brand internationally. Legalizing zone defense, adding a defensive 3 second violation, creating the charge circle, etc.


I really believe if Rose and Isiah Thomas switched places, you would have an elite guard in Isiah today and be questioning whether he's tough enough to get stitched up and return to a regular season game like Rose did in the 80's.

I really believe the exact opposite.


First of all, quote dissecting is pretty lame.

Secondly, you have to have realized you are reinforcing what I've said throughout your post. Careers were shortened by more physical play, and since today's league has "less" physical play, current players have longer careers. Which part of it does it appear to you that proves 80s players were tougher than today's? If they had been tougher, then today's NBA players should have similar career length despite the physicality being decreased.

And how is calling them "friends, not just colleagues and coworkers" a counter argument to me saying that's why they now care about each others' well being? If anything, it makes them care more. In the 80s, guys on rival teams act like mortal enemies of one another, that's what made play without any regard to opponent's safety. How often in the 80s did you see players hold on to a guy they just intentionally fouled to prevent a layup just so the guy doesn't fall down? Hell, how often did you even see them landing a hand to an opponent to help them get up?

That's the culture change I'm referring to. Maybe it's because of Stern's rule change, maybe it's something else, but if Isiah Thomas grew up under these softer rules today, he would be a softer guy like the rest of em.

I think everybody else is seeing this simple logic. Please take a minute to think about it before you post another supposed rebuttal.

No problem, I'll do it your way and write a giant blob.

Do you have an issue with reading comprehension? Nowhere did I say that careers were shortened by more physical play. I said that careers were shortened by players playing through injury. These two ideas are not synonymous. The changes to the rules have nothing at all to do with players playing through injury. Also, do you have numbers to back up a claim that there's a significant difference in career length between players in the 80s and now?

I'm just baffled how you manage to miss the point of everything. Being friends is a whole lot different from being "colleagues and coworkers." They might reach a similar end, but the means are wholly different. Realizing their status as colleagues and coworkers would involve some sort of league-wide enlightenment that occurred right around the 2004 season. In reality, basketball's popularity skyrocketed so much in the 90s that all these players were in the spotlight as kids, and they all know each other from AAU and powerhouse high schools. Saying that the players started to treat one another as colleagues proves that you don't understand the issue at hand. I think everyone else is seeing this simple logic.

You're really barking up the wrong tree with Isiah. That comment might be true about an average 80s player, but Isiah wasn't average. Why do you think KG and Artest stand out as crazy guys in a softer league? They both had crappy upbringings. It's the same story for Isiah. Growing up poor and hungry in Chicago with a pimp and a heroin addict for brothers (the addict died of AIDS) gave him the overwhelming desire to prove himself and succeed. This is a guy who, at 5'11, took swings at Bill Cartwright, Rick Mahorn, and pretty much every other big man of his era. Such behavior isn't indicative of your average 80s player, or your average player from any era.


Lol, why are you so insistent on differentiating relationship status between being colleagues and being friends? Have you recently reached puberty and just is really sensitive? We are talking about today's players caring more about one another's well being more than 80s' players did. And since you agree both "reach a similar end," let's stop wasting time on this moot point.

And please take more lessons in critical thinking. I said since they do care about one another's well being, this means general decrease in physicality during games, such as guys holding onto someone to both prevent a layup and him fouling hard on the floor. Please stop picking a hair between "less physical play" and "playing through injuries" and see the simple causal relationship between the two... or I can just spell it out for you I suppose: less physical play leads to less injuries in general leads to less need to play through injuries. Unless you want to argue today's players just don't play through injuries, in which case I would guess you didn't watch the playoffs last year and see Bynum playing through a bum knee for over a month after injuring it in the first round.

As for real numbers backing up today's players having longer careers, go look up a recent Bill Simmons column about stars extending their peaks. Please stop saying it's some kind of sudden enlightenment in 2004. It's not, guys Simmons listed have been playing since the 90s. The change is a gradual one, hence why someone like you who lacks the resolve or the intelligence to look beyond the surface of NBA rules and statistics would likely not to notice.

Oh, and the "crazy" Artest and Garnett would have killed a motherfucker on the court already if they were playing in the 80s, but like Isiah would have if he grew up playing in today's NBA, both have generally controlled themselves on the court. You know why? (hint: I just told you why)
Judicator
Profile Blog Joined August 2004
United States7270 Posts
February 09 2011 21:41 GMT
#1495
On February 10 2011 06:10 ricerocket wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 10 2011 01:45 city42 wrote:
On February 09 2011 17:33 ricerocket wrote:
On February 09 2011 14:43 city42 wrote:
On February 09 2011 14:00 ricerocket wrote:
Uh, do you think Isiah would do that in today's NBA? Not whether or not he could, but whether or not he would.

Yes.

The notion that "old school" people are tougher than today's NBA players is -- for the lack of a better word -- laughable. If you just compare two random games from the 80s and the 00s, you will see players are generally stronger and faster, not to mention lasting longer physically as they have longer careers, which are the result of better training, conditioning and medical treatments.

Why exactly is it laughable? And do you realize the contradiction you just put forth in this paragraph? First, you claim that today's players are either level or have the edge in the toughness department on the old school guys. Then, you claim that today's players last longer physically. The truth is, players of previous generations had shorter careers BECAUSE they were tougher. Do you think it helped Kevin McHale's career length expectancy when he played through 4 playoff rounds with a broken foot? Looking at a modern day warrior, how's that decision to rush back for the playoffs last year working out for Roy? Unfortunately players like Roy are becoming rarer and rarer.


The reason neither Isiah's response nor the hard foul would happen in the first place is that the entire culture of the league is now very different. Players realize that while they are competitors against one another, they are also colleagues and coworkers, and it is to nobody's benefit if someone breaks his neck on the court, and you do yourself no good if you come out of injuries too soon. We as fans may care about whether they are really "tough guys," but I hope everyone at least realizes deep down that those people making millions playing ball really don't give a damn what we think.

Again, wrong. The attitude of today's game is different for two main reasons:

1) Players aren't just colleagues and coworkers, they are FRIENDS. They've been playing together since they were teenagers on AAU teams, and there is very little vitriol in the league. You make it seem like the NBA just had an epiphany and decided to be friendly. I don't recall Karl Malone giving up his style of play as he continued into the 2000s, and I don't see KG trying to make friends on the court (remember, he wasn't an AAU guy).
2) Stern has been gradually making the game more finesse-based in order to sell the brand internationally. Legalizing zone defense, adding a defensive 3 second violation, creating the charge circle, etc.


I really believe if Rose and Isiah Thomas switched places, you would have an elite guard in Isiah today and be questioning whether he's tough enough to get stitched up and return to a regular season game like Rose did in the 80's.

I really believe the exact opposite.


First of all, quote dissecting is pretty lame.

Secondly, you have to have realized you are reinforcing what I've said throughout your post. Careers were shortened by more physical play, and since today's league has "less" physical play, current players have longer careers. Which part of it does it appear to you that proves 80s players were tougher than today's? If they had been tougher, then today's NBA players should have similar career length despite the physicality being decreased.

And how is calling them "friends, not just colleagues and coworkers" a counter argument to me saying that's why they now care about each others' well being? If anything, it makes them care more. In the 80s, guys on rival teams act like mortal enemies of one another, that's what made play without any regard to opponent's safety. How often in the 80s did you see players hold on to a guy they just intentionally fouled to prevent a layup just so the guy doesn't fall down? Hell, how often did you even see them landing a hand to an opponent to help them get up?

That's the culture change I'm referring to. Maybe it's because of Stern's rule change, maybe it's something else, but if Isiah Thomas grew up under these softer rules today, he would be a softer guy like the rest of em.

I think everybody else is seeing this simple logic. Please take a minute to think about it before you post another supposed rebuttal.

No problem, I'll do it your way and write a giant blob.

Do you have an issue with reading comprehension? Nowhere did I say that careers were shortened by more physical play. I said that careers were shortened by players playing through injury. These two ideas are not synonymous. The changes to the rules have nothing at all to do with players playing through injury. Also, do you have numbers to back up a claim that there's a significant difference in career length between players in the 80s and now?

I'm just baffled how you manage to miss the point of everything. Being friends is a whole lot different from being "colleagues and coworkers." They might reach a similar end, but the means are wholly different. Realizing their status as colleagues and coworkers would involve some sort of league-wide enlightenment that occurred right around the 2004 season. In reality, basketball's popularity skyrocketed so much in the 90s that all these players were in the spotlight as kids, and they all know each other from AAU and powerhouse high schools. Saying that the players started to treat one another as colleagues proves that you don't understand the issue at hand. I think everyone else is seeing this simple logic.

You're really barking up the wrong tree with Isiah. That comment might be true about an average 80s player, but Isiah wasn't average. Why do you think KG and Artest stand out as crazy guys in a softer league? They both had crappy upbringings. It's the same story for Isiah. Growing up poor and hungry in Chicago with a pimp and a heroin addict for brothers (the addict died of AIDS) gave him the overwhelming desire to prove himself and succeed. This is a guy who, at 5'11, took swings at Bill Cartwright, Rick Mahorn, and pretty much every other big man of his era. Such behavior isn't indicative of your average 80s player, or your average player from any era.


Lol, why are you so insistent on differentiating relationship status between being colleagues and being friends? Have you recently reached puberty and just is really sensitive? We are talking about today's players caring more about one another's well being more than 80s' players did. And since you agree both "reach a similar end," let's stop wasting time on this moot point.

And please take more lessons in critical thinking. I said since they do care about one another's well being, this means general decrease in physicality during games, such as guys holding onto someone to both prevent a layup and him fouling hard on the floor. Please stop picking a hair between "less physical play" and "playing through injuries" and see the simple causal relationship between the two... or I can just spell it out for you I suppose: less physical play leads to less injuries in general leads to less need to play through injuries. Unless you want to argue today's players just don't play through injuries, in which case I would guess you didn't watch the playoffs last year and see Bynum playing through a bum knee for over a month after injuring it in the first round.

As for real numbers backing up today's players having longer careers, go look up a recent Bill Simmons column about stars extending their peaks. Please stop saying it's some kind of sudden enlightenment in 2004. It's not, guys Simmons listed have been playing since the 90s. The change is a gradual one, hence why someone like you who lacks the resolve or the intelligence to look beyond the surface of NBA rules and statistics would likely not to notice.

Oh, and the "crazy" Artest and Garnett would have killed a motherfucker on the court already if they were playing in the 80s, but like Isiah would have if he grew up playing in today's NBA, both have generally controlled themselves on the court. You know why? (hint: I just told you why)


If you're gonna post like that just GTFO. If you honestly though Isiah would be a cool dude playing in today's NBA...lol, you clearly do not know Isiah. He's Artest before Artest, or rather Artest is kind of like him with less control (prior to counseling). Most of his teammates said something along the lines of he was cool until something set him off; whatever the trigger was, it was just overwhelming at that point.
Get it by your hands...
ricerocket
Profile Joined May 2010
154 Posts
February 09 2011 21:44 GMT
#1496
On February 10 2011 06:41 Judicator wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 10 2011 06:10 ricerocket wrote:
On February 10 2011 01:45 city42 wrote:
On February 09 2011 17:33 ricerocket wrote:
On February 09 2011 14:43 city42 wrote:
On February 09 2011 14:00 ricerocket wrote:
Uh, do you think Isiah would do that in today's NBA? Not whether or not he could, but whether or not he would.

Yes.

The notion that "old school" people are tougher than today's NBA players is -- for the lack of a better word -- laughable. If you just compare two random games from the 80s and the 00s, you will see players are generally stronger and faster, not to mention lasting longer physically as they have longer careers, which are the result of better training, conditioning and medical treatments.

Why exactly is it laughable? And do you realize the contradiction you just put forth in this paragraph? First, you claim that today's players are either level or have the edge in the toughness department on the old school guys. Then, you claim that today's players last longer physically. The truth is, players of previous generations had shorter careers BECAUSE they were tougher. Do you think it helped Kevin McHale's career length expectancy when he played through 4 playoff rounds with a broken foot? Looking at a modern day warrior, how's that decision to rush back for the playoffs last year working out for Roy? Unfortunately players like Roy are becoming rarer and rarer.


The reason neither Isiah's response nor the hard foul would happen in the first place is that the entire culture of the league is now very different. Players realize that while they are competitors against one another, they are also colleagues and coworkers, and it is to nobody's benefit if someone breaks his neck on the court, and you do yourself no good if you come out of injuries too soon. We as fans may care about whether they are really "tough guys," but I hope everyone at least realizes deep down that those people making millions playing ball really don't give a damn what we think.

Again, wrong. The attitude of today's game is different for two main reasons:

1) Players aren't just colleagues and coworkers, they are FRIENDS. They've been playing together since they were teenagers on AAU teams, and there is very little vitriol in the league. You make it seem like the NBA just had an epiphany and decided to be friendly. I don't recall Karl Malone giving up his style of play as he continued into the 2000s, and I don't see KG trying to make friends on the court (remember, he wasn't an AAU guy).
2) Stern has been gradually making the game more finesse-based in order to sell the brand internationally. Legalizing zone defense, adding a defensive 3 second violation, creating the charge circle, etc.


I really believe if Rose and Isiah Thomas switched places, you would have an elite guard in Isiah today and be questioning whether he's tough enough to get stitched up and return to a regular season game like Rose did in the 80's.

I really believe the exact opposite.


First of all, quote dissecting is pretty lame.

Secondly, you have to have realized you are reinforcing what I've said throughout your post. Careers were shortened by more physical play, and since today's league has "less" physical play, current players have longer careers. Which part of it does it appear to you that proves 80s players were tougher than today's? If they had been tougher, then today's NBA players should have similar career length despite the physicality being decreased.

And how is calling them "friends, not just colleagues and coworkers" a counter argument to me saying that's why they now care about each others' well being? If anything, it makes them care more. In the 80s, guys on rival teams act like mortal enemies of one another, that's what made play without any regard to opponent's safety. How often in the 80s did you see players hold on to a guy they just intentionally fouled to prevent a layup just so the guy doesn't fall down? Hell, how often did you even see them landing a hand to an opponent to help them get up?

That's the culture change I'm referring to. Maybe it's because of Stern's rule change, maybe it's something else, but if Isiah Thomas grew up under these softer rules today, he would be a softer guy like the rest of em.

I think everybody else is seeing this simple logic. Please take a minute to think about it before you post another supposed rebuttal.

No problem, I'll do it your way and write a giant blob.

Do you have an issue with reading comprehension? Nowhere did I say that careers were shortened by more physical play. I said that careers were shortened by players playing through injury. These two ideas are not synonymous. The changes to the rules have nothing at all to do with players playing through injury. Also, do you have numbers to back up a claim that there's a significant difference in career length between players in the 80s and now?

I'm just baffled how you manage to miss the point of everything. Being friends is a whole lot different from being "colleagues and coworkers." They might reach a similar end, but the means are wholly different. Realizing their status as colleagues and coworkers would involve some sort of league-wide enlightenment that occurred right around the 2004 season. In reality, basketball's popularity skyrocketed so much in the 90s that all these players were in the spotlight as kids, and they all know each other from AAU and powerhouse high schools. Saying that the players started to treat one another as colleagues proves that you don't understand the issue at hand. I think everyone else is seeing this simple logic.

You're really barking up the wrong tree with Isiah. That comment might be true about an average 80s player, but Isiah wasn't average. Why do you think KG and Artest stand out as crazy guys in a softer league? They both had crappy upbringings. It's the same story for Isiah. Growing up poor and hungry in Chicago with a pimp and a heroin addict for brothers (the addict died of AIDS) gave him the overwhelming desire to prove himself and succeed. This is a guy who, at 5'11, took swings at Bill Cartwright, Rick Mahorn, and pretty much every other big man of his era. Such behavior isn't indicative of your average 80s player, or your average player from any era.


Lol, why are you so insistent on differentiating relationship status between being colleagues and being friends? Have you recently reached puberty and just is really sensitive? We are talking about today's players caring more about one another's well being more than 80s' players did. And since you agree both "reach a similar end," let's stop wasting time on this moot point.

And please take more lessons in critical thinking. I said since they do care about one another's well being, this means general decrease in physicality during games, such as guys holding onto someone to both prevent a layup and him fouling hard on the floor. Please stop picking a hair between "less physical play" and "playing through injuries" and see the simple causal relationship between the two... or I can just spell it out for you I suppose: less physical play leads to less injuries in general leads to less need to play through injuries. Unless you want to argue today's players just don't play through injuries, in which case I would guess you didn't watch the playoffs last year and see Bynum playing through a bum knee for over a month after injuring it in the first round.

As for real numbers backing up today's players having longer careers, go look up a recent Bill Simmons column about stars extending their peaks. Please stop saying it's some kind of sudden enlightenment in 2004. It's not, guys Simmons listed have been playing since the 90s. The change is a gradual one, hence why someone like you who lacks the resolve or the intelligence to look beyond the surface of NBA rules and statistics would likely not to notice.

Oh, and the "crazy" Artest and Garnett would have killed a motherfucker on the court already if they were playing in the 80s, but like Isiah would have if he grew up playing in today's NBA, both have generally controlled themselves on the court. You know why? (hint: I just told you why)


If you're gonna post like that just GTFO. If you honestly though Isiah would be a cool dude playing in today's NBA...lol, you clearly do not know Isiah. He's Artest before Artest, or rather Artest is kind of like him with less control (prior to counseling). Most of his teammates said something along the lines of he was cool until something set him off; whatever the trigger was, it was just overwhelming at that point.


... Thanks for repeating what I said.
Judicator
Profile Blog Joined August 2004
United States7270 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-02-09 21:57:05
February 09 2011 21:55 GMT
#1497
On February 10 2011 06:44 ricerocket wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 10 2011 06:41 Judicator wrote:
On February 10 2011 06:10 ricerocket wrote:
On February 10 2011 01:45 city42 wrote:
On February 09 2011 17:33 ricerocket wrote:
On February 09 2011 14:43 city42 wrote:
On February 09 2011 14:00 ricerocket wrote:
Uh, do you think Isiah would do that in today's NBA? Not whether or not he could, but whether or not he would.

Yes.

The notion that "old school" people are tougher than today's NBA players is -- for the lack of a better word -- laughable. If you just compare two random games from the 80s and the 00s, you will see players are generally stronger and faster, not to mention lasting longer physically as they have longer careers, which are the result of better training, conditioning and medical treatments.

Why exactly is it laughable? And do you realize the contradiction you just put forth in this paragraph? First, you claim that today's players are either level or have the edge in the toughness department on the old school guys. Then, you claim that today's players last longer physically. The truth is, players of previous generations had shorter careers BECAUSE they were tougher. Do you think it helped Kevin McHale's career length expectancy when he played through 4 playoff rounds with a broken foot? Looking at a modern day warrior, how's that decision to rush back for the playoffs last year working out for Roy? Unfortunately players like Roy are becoming rarer and rarer.


The reason neither Isiah's response nor the hard foul would happen in the first place is that the entire culture of the league is now very different. Players realize that while they are competitors against one another, they are also colleagues and coworkers, and it is to nobody's benefit if someone breaks his neck on the court, and you do yourself no good if you come out of injuries too soon. We as fans may care about whether they are really "tough guys," but I hope everyone at least realizes deep down that those people making millions playing ball really don't give a damn what we think.

Again, wrong. The attitude of today's game is different for two main reasons:

1) Players aren't just colleagues and coworkers, they are FRIENDS. They've been playing together since they were teenagers on AAU teams, and there is very little vitriol in the league. You make it seem like the NBA just had an epiphany and decided to be friendly. I don't recall Karl Malone giving up his style of play as he continued into the 2000s, and I don't see KG trying to make friends on the court (remember, he wasn't an AAU guy).
2) Stern has been gradually making the game more finesse-based in order to sell the brand internationally. Legalizing zone defense, adding a defensive 3 second violation, creating the charge circle, etc.


I really believe if Rose and Isiah Thomas switched places, you would have an elite guard in Isiah today and be questioning whether he's tough enough to get stitched up and return to a regular season game like Rose did in the 80's.

I really believe the exact opposite.


First of all, quote dissecting is pretty lame.

Secondly, you have to have realized you are reinforcing what I've said throughout your post. Careers were shortened by more physical play, and since today's league has "less" physical play, current players have longer careers. Which part of it does it appear to you that proves 80s players were tougher than today's? If they had been tougher, then today's NBA players should have similar career length despite the physicality being decreased.

And how is calling them "friends, not just colleagues and coworkers" a counter argument to me saying that's why they now care about each others' well being? If anything, it makes them care more. In the 80s, guys on rival teams act like mortal enemies of one another, that's what made play without any regard to opponent's safety. How often in the 80s did you see players hold on to a guy they just intentionally fouled to prevent a layup just so the guy doesn't fall down? Hell, how often did you even see them landing a hand to an opponent to help them get up?

That's the culture change I'm referring to. Maybe it's because of Stern's rule change, maybe it's something else, but if Isiah Thomas grew up under these softer rules today, he would be a softer guy like the rest of em.

I think everybody else is seeing this simple logic. Please take a minute to think about it before you post another supposed rebuttal.

No problem, I'll do it your way and write a giant blob.

Do you have an issue with reading comprehension? Nowhere did I say that careers were shortened by more physical play. I said that careers were shortened by players playing through injury. These two ideas are not synonymous. The changes to the rules have nothing at all to do with players playing through injury. Also, do you have numbers to back up a claim that there's a significant difference in career length between players in the 80s and now?

I'm just baffled how you manage to miss the point of everything. Being friends is a whole lot different from being "colleagues and coworkers." They might reach a similar end, but the means are wholly different. Realizing their status as colleagues and coworkers would involve some sort of league-wide enlightenment that occurred right around the 2004 season. In reality, basketball's popularity skyrocketed so much in the 90s that all these players were in the spotlight as kids, and they all know each other from AAU and powerhouse high schools. Saying that the players started to treat one another as colleagues proves that you don't understand the issue at hand. I think everyone else is seeing this simple logic.

You're really barking up the wrong tree with Isiah. That comment might be true about an average 80s player, but Isiah wasn't average. Why do you think KG and Artest stand out as crazy guys in a softer league? They both had crappy upbringings. It's the same story for Isiah. Growing up poor and hungry in Chicago with a pimp and a heroin addict for brothers (the addict died of AIDS) gave him the overwhelming desire to prove himself and succeed. This is a guy who, at 5'11, took swings at Bill Cartwright, Rick Mahorn, and pretty much every other big man of his era. Such behavior isn't indicative of your average 80s player, or your average player from any era.


Lol, why are you so insistent on differentiating relationship status between being colleagues and being friends? Have you recently reached puberty and just is really sensitive? We are talking about today's players caring more about one another's well being more than 80s' players did. And since you agree both "reach a similar end," let's stop wasting time on this moot point.

And please take more lessons in critical thinking. I said since they do care about one another's well being, this means general decrease in physicality during games, such as guys holding onto someone to both prevent a layup and him fouling hard on the floor. Please stop picking a hair between "less physical play" and "playing through injuries" and see the simple causal relationship between the two... or I can just spell it out for you I suppose: less physical play leads to less injuries in general leads to less need to play through injuries. Unless you want to argue today's players just don't play through injuries, in which case I would guess you didn't watch the playoffs last year and see Bynum playing through a bum knee for over a month after injuring it in the first round.

As for real numbers backing up today's players having longer careers, go look up a recent Bill Simmons column about stars extending their peaks. Please stop saying it's some kind of sudden enlightenment in 2004. It's not, guys Simmons listed have been playing since the 90s. The change is a gradual one, hence why someone like you who lacks the resolve or the intelligence to look beyond the surface of NBA rules and statistics would likely not to notice.

Oh, and the "crazy" Artest and Garnett would have killed a motherfucker on the court already if they were playing in the 80s, but like Isiah would have if he grew up playing in today's NBA, both have generally controlled themselves on the court. You know why? (hint: I just told you why)


If you're gonna post like that just GTFO. If you honestly though Isiah would be a cool dude playing in today's NBA...lol, you clearly do not know Isiah. He's Artest before Artest, or rather Artest is kind of like him with less control (prior to counseling). Most of his teammates said something along the lines of he was cool until something set him off; whatever the trigger was, it was just overwhelming at that point.


... Thanks for repeating what I said.


What? Yet, you still claim to read posts carefully enough to understand them?

Hint Edit: Thanks for proving city42's original point about you failing at reading comprehension.
Get it by your hands...
Ace
Profile Blog Joined October 2002
United States16096 Posts
February 09 2011 22:00 GMT
#1498
This isn't the first time he's been guilty of that
Math me up, scumboi. - Acrofales
ricerocket
Profile Joined May 2010
154 Posts
February 09 2011 22:01 GMT
#1499
If you can't see how you just repeated my craziness comparison between Artest and Isiah, then you should just open another NBA thread for illiterates. Looks like you'll have peers plenty.
ricerocket
Profile Joined May 2010
154 Posts
February 09 2011 22:02 GMT
#1500
Or maybe you already intended that with this thread, then I should probably just back out and kick myself for being down at you guys' level to even join the "discussion."

Am I in the Idiocracy alternate universe here? LOL
Prev 1 73 74 75 76 77 160 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Kung Fu Cup
11:00
2026 Week 16
IntoTheiNu 717
WardiTV400
RotterdaM333
TKL 119
Ryung 105
SteadfastSC78
Rex72
LiquipediaDiscussion
The PondCast
10:00
Episode 102
CranKy Ducklings29
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Lowko402
RotterdaM 333
TKL 119
Ryung 105
SteadfastSC 78
Rex 72
StarCraft: Brood War
Calm 3384
Bisu 2127
Horang2 701
BeSt 654
Jaedong 592
Soma 484
Snow 274
Leta 264
firebathero 241
Rush 225
[ Show more ]
Mini 214
Hyun 191
Stork 178
Pusan 164
EffOrt 162
Last 144
Zeus 128
Light 123
Killer 123
Dewaltoss 105
Soulkey 103
ZerO 85
ggaemo 78
Mong 72
ToSsGirL 56
Mind 45
[sc1f]eonzerg 41
Aegong 36
hero 34
JulyZerg 29
sorry 29
NaDa 26
Icarus 19
Hm[arnc] 17
Sacsri 16
Sexy 15
Movie 14
JYJ 12
GoRush 12
yabsab 11
Nal_rA 10
Noble 10
Yoon 9
ajuk12(nOOB) 9
Rain 0
Dota 2
XcaliburYe418
Counter-Strike
fl0m2196
byalli181
Other Games
FrodaN3014
singsing1399
B2W.Neo537
uThermal230
Pyrionflax167
Liquid`LucifroN148
ArmadaUGS69
Trikslyr48
CosmosSc2 23
ZerO(Twitch)7
Organizations
StarCraft: Brood War
lovetv 16
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• CranKy Ducklings SOOP10
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 1709
League of Legends
• Stunt683
• TFBlade430
Upcoming Events
OSC
12h 15m
CrankTV Team League
23h 15m
Replay Cast
1d 12h
CrankTV Team League
1d 23h
Korean StarCraft League
2 days
Afreeca Starleague
2 days
RSL Revival
2 days
Serral vs SHIN
herO vs Solar
Online Event
3 days
Replay Cast
3 days
RSL Revival
3 days
Clem vs ByuN
Rogue vs Lambo
[ Show More ]
WardiTV Weekly
4 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
PiGosaur Cup
6 days
The PondCast
6 days
Kung Fu Cup
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-07-21
HSC XXIX
Eternal Conflict S2 E3

Ongoing

CSL 2026 Summer (S21)
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 3
RSL Revival: Season 6
CranK Gathers Season 4: BW vs SC2 Team League
SCTL 2026 Spring
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual
Stake Ranked Episode 3
XSE Pro League 2026
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
PGL Astana 2026

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S3: W4
ASL S22 SEASON OPEN Day 2
Escore Tournament S3: W5
CSLAN 4
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
HSC XXX
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
Light Tournament 2026
Eternal Conflict S2 Finale
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
Logitech G Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #5
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.