NFL Season 2010 - Page 253
Forum Index > General Games |
tonight
United States11130 Posts
| ||
Ferrose
United States11378 Posts
On January 27 2011 07:05 tonight wrote: I can't wait for the biggest waste of an all-star game this weekend! I understand why they put it before the Super Bowl now, but it just means that a bunch of players withdraw because they have to play the next week -_- | ||
Qatol
United States3165 Posts
On January 27 2011 06:20 Ferrose wrote: No cheerleaders? Oh darn. The game is ruined. ![]() Out of the final 4 teams, only the Jets have cheerleaders. We were pretty much screwed after the divisional rounds ended. | ||
Ferrose
United States11378 Posts
On January 27 2011 07:21 Qatol wrote: Out of the final 4 teams, only the Jets have cheerleaders. We were pretty much screwed after the divisional rounds ended. What are the producers gonna show when the casters read off the sponsors after commercial breaks? | ||
DannyJ
United States5110 Posts
On January 27 2011 07:18 Ferrose wrote: I understand why they put it before the Super Bowl now, but it just means that a bunch of players withdraw because they have to play the next week -_- The lack of a few players isn't why the Pro Bowl sucks in every imaginable way. | ||
Ferrose
United States11378 Posts
On January 27 2011 07:41 DannyJ wrote: The lack of a few players isn't why the Pro Bowl sucks in every imaginable way. It's one of the reasons ![]() | ||
QuanticHawk
United States32044 Posts
labor stuffs: Kevin Maewae the player rep said that they are preparing for a lockout. | ||
tonight
United States11130 Posts
| ||
DannyJ
United States5110 Posts
*sobs | ||
![]()
Souma
2nd Worst City in CA8938 Posts
Just kidding, I'm not that evil. =) I still want to play fantasy! | ||
Qatol
United States3165 Posts
On January 27 2011 07:29 Ferrose wrote: What are the producers gonna show when the casters read off the sponsors after commercial breaks? They usually show drunken fans without shirts in subzero temperatures. Dunno what they're planning on showing in the nice warm dome in Dallas. | ||
SweeTLemonS[TPR]
11739 Posts
| ||
![]()
Souma
2nd Worst City in CA8938 Posts
| ||
FQD1911
83 Posts
On January 25 2011 04:28 Shindou wrote: The eli manning and jay cutler thing doesn't work. everyone's known that cutler's been a dick to teamates and coaches in the past. eli manning looks kinda dumb and makes pretty dumb plays. maybe cutler did suffer a pretty bad injury, but nobody's going to care about that when you sit on the sidelines with a puss face instead of interacting with your teamates n being encouraging and you are playing bad. I don't think martz's offense is a good fit for cutler but its a simple case of if he made some kinda effort to give a shit and/or was good, nobody would be complaining. Instead when reporters told him other players in the league were making fun of him on twitter he started to tear up. Sweet QB. ? umm...proof? (and i'm talking teammates here). the only person that has something bad to say about him is McDaniels (gee...wonder why). Shanahan & Lovie love him, Brandon Marshall complimented him every time they asked him about Cutler, so where's this coming from? | ||
SweeTLemonS[TPR]
11739 Posts
On January 28 2011 03:30 FQD1911 wrote: ? umm...proof? (and i'm talking teammates here). the only person that has something bad to say about him is McDaniels (gee...wonder why). Shanahan & Lovie love him, Brandon Marshall complimented him every time they asked him about Cutler, so where's this coming from? Yeah, the only thing he can really go back to is the McDaniels situation, and he keeps calling him a whiny bitch over that single situation. There wasn't anything to suggest that priorly, and there is nothing afterwards. It was an isolated incident, but it gets extrapolated to become his personality. | ||
QuanticHawk
United States32044 Posts
On January 27 2011 13:51 Qatol wrote: They usually show drunken fans without shirts in subzero temperatures. Dunno what they're planning on showing in the nice warm dome in Dallas. Yeah it's not like the stands are typically filled with hard core fans on the superbowl either. Most people can't afford a gazzillion dollars to park and another two to get in. | ||
![]()
BroOd
Austin10831 Posts
On January 28 2011 05:16 Hawk wrote: Yeah it's not like the stands are typically filled with hard core fans on the superbowl either. Most people can't afford a gazzillion dollars to park and another two to get in. There will probably be more than most years, considering these teams have two of the best traveling fan bases in football. | ||
SweeTLemonS[TPR]
11739 Posts
On January 28 2011 05:18 BroOd wrote: There will probably be more than most years, considering these teams have two of the best traveling fan bases in football. As much as that is true, there weren't that many Packers fans at the Championship game. Certainly more than there were Seahawks fans the week before, but the Seahawks have very few fans, comparatively. Maybe I just expected to see more Packers fans though. | ||
Qatol
United States3165 Posts
On January 28 2011 05:16 Hawk wrote: Yeah it's not like the stands are typically filled with hard core fans on the superbowl either. Most people can't afford a gazzillion dollars to park and another two to get in. There's a difference. It isn't 20 below zero at the superbowl. The whole point of showing those fans is for people to laugh at how idiotic they are. On January 28 2011 05:47 SweeTLemonS[TPR] wrote: As much as that is true, there weren't that many Packers fans at the Championship game. Certainly more than there were Seahawks fans the week before, but the Seahawks have very few fans, comparatively. Maybe I just expected to see more Packers fans though. Well Chicago has a very good traveling fan base too. More importantly, they have the smallest stadium in the league for the largest city with only 1 team. I think it was just too hard for the average Packers fan to get tickets. | ||
QuanticHawk
United States32044 Posts
whitlock is the biggest fucking twat i swear | ||
| ||