EPTthen again, it's vs the bills running D... lol
NFL Season 2010 - Page 179
| Forum Index > General Games |
LosingID8
CA10829 Posts
then again, it's vs the bills running D... lol | ||
|
GoShox
United States1843 Posts
| ||
|
setzer
United States3284 Posts
| ||
|
LosingID8
CA10829 Posts
32 carries, 158 yds (4.9ypc) 2 receptions, 15 yds 1 punt return, 25 yds total yds: 198 | ||
|
Qatol
United States3165 Posts
On January 03 2011 05:46 GoShox wrote: Looks like some of the Chiefs decided to take this game off. Let's hope they decide to show against the Ravens, or that's going to be an ugly, ugly game. It also means that the Raiders are the only team to ever sweep their division and not make the playoffs since the merger. A bit of a funky stat, but I thought it was amusing. Wow the Bears are using Hester on returns this week. That is really surprising to me. Knox and Manning aren't exactly scrubs and it is just so easy to get hurt on a return with all those players running full force at each other. | ||
|
Ferrose
United States11378 Posts
| ||
|
SweeTLemonS[TPR]
11739 Posts
Al Davis is so stupid. Cable is turning that team around, and he wants to get rid of him. How about you get the guy a talented QB that isn't a fat, lazy piece of shit? I realize that Campbell isn't fat and lazy, but he isn't talented either. If that team could regularly complete passes, it'd be a playoff contender. They're a really good WR and QB away from being a dominant team, imo. Thankfully, for all the Broncos fans, Davis is probably the worst owner in the league, and will fire a guy that's making incredibly positive change for his franchise. | ||
|
Ferrose
United States11378 Posts
| ||
|
SweeTLemonS[TPR]
11739 Posts
| ||
|
KOFgokuon
United States14900 Posts
| ||
|
SweeTLemonS[TPR]
11739 Posts
| ||
Seeker
Where dat snitch at?37058 Posts
NY Giants: 10-6 TB Bucs: 10-6 GB Packers: 10-6 Why does Green Bay advance? - -;; I like Bucs..... | ||
|
Ferrose
United States11378 Posts
Edit @ Seeker: Green Bay has a head-to-head win against New York. I don't know what the tiebreak over Tampa is though. They have the same conference record. Points scored maybe? | ||
|
andrewlt
United States7702 Posts
On January 03 2011 06:23 Qatol wrote: It also means that the Raiders are the only team to ever sweep their division and not make the playoffs since the merger. A bit of a funky stat, but I thought it was amusing. Wow the Bears are using Hester on returns this week. That is really surprising to me. Knox and Manning aren't exactly scrubs and it is just so easy to get hurt on a return with all those players running full force at each other. This seems certainly the year of funky stats. It's the first time both Superbowl teams made it back to the playoffs the next season, in a long while. It could also be the first time a division winner with a losing record goes into the playoffs with the current format. That said, I'm cheering for the Seahawks for the lulz. | ||
|
Qatol
United States3165 Posts
On January 03 2011 09:46 SweeTLemonS[TPR] wrote: If he does lose the job, I'm pretty sure he'll get a job somewhere else. What he has done in two seasons with one of the worst teams of the decade is just short of miraculous. They aren't even a greatly talented team, due to eight years of abysmal drafting, maybe more years. The team has been an absolute joke since the 2002 season. I'm half hoping he does get a job with some decent management and some talent on his team, somewhere like Tennessee, Houston, or the Giants. That would be fun to watch, plus egg on Davis' face is always fun. On January 03 2011 09:49 Seeker wrote: Can someone explain this to me please? NY Giants: 10-6 TB Bucs: 10-6 GB Packers: 10-6 Why does Green Bay advance? - -;; I like Bucs..... Strength of victory tiebreaker. Add up the number of wins for the teams each team has beaten. Green Bay's wins have been over opponents with the most combined wins, so they advance. | ||
GTR
51525 Posts
| ||
|
thunk
United States6233 Posts
| ||
|
SweeTLemonS[TPR]
11739 Posts
It must be on strength of scheduling, but I thought it went on common opponents first. In which case, TB beat Washington, while Washington beat GB, thus TB>GB in standings if it went common opponents first. I guess GB 2-0 v Det, and TB<Det too, though, so who knows. I'd like to see the official tie breakers thing. ESPN probably has it, or nfl.com, but I'm not going to look it up. | ||
|
andrewlt
United States7702 Posts
| ||
|
Ferrose
United States11378 Posts
On January 03 2011 10:11 SweeTLemonS[TPR] wrote: In my defense, I wasn't specific about which eight years were bad. It must be on strength of scheduling, but I thought it went on common opponents first. In which case, TB beat Washington, while Washington beat GB, thus TB>GB in standings if it went common opponents first. I guess GB 2-0 v Det, and TB<Det too, though, so who knows. I'd like to see the official tie breakers thing. ESPN probably has it, or nfl.com, but I'm not going to look it up. Three or More Clubs Head-to-head sweep. (Applicable only if one club has defeated each of the others or if one club has lost to each of the others.) Best won-lost-tied percentage in games played within the conference. Best won-lost-tied percentage in common games, minimum of four. Strength of victory. Strength of schedule. Best combined ranking among conference teams in points scored and points allowed. Best combined ranking among all teams in points scored and points allowed. Best net points in conference games. Best net points in all games. Best net touchdowns in all games. Coin toss Green Bay beat New York. Green Bay was 1-1 against Detroit, while Tampa was 0-1. Green Bay was 0-1 against Atlanta, while Tampa was 0-2. Tampa beat Washington, Green Bay lost to Washington. Both beat San Francisco. Idk which four you'd choose. It says on ESPN that Green Bay wins out by strength of victory, which is .475. New York's is .396, and Tampa's is .342, the lowest in the NFL. | ||
| ||
