EPTCivilization V + DLC's, G&K, BNW - Page 99
| Forum Index > General Games |
|
xDaunt
United States17988 Posts
| ||
|
Sufficiency
Canada23833 Posts
On March 26 2013 06:16 xDaunt wrote: I understand the marketing reasons for placing women on these gaming panels, but is it really too much to ask to get one who either can actually contribute something meaningful to the conversation or simply shut up? The girl in that second demo video is spectacularly obnoxious and uninformed. You would think that if someone was going to pay her to be present, that they might expect her to know something (re: anything) about what was being discussed. Boobs >>> knowledge and skills. + Show Spoiler + I kid, of course. Please don't generalize. It could well be a guy there. | ||
|
Emnjay808
United States10665 Posts
| ||
|
xDaunt
United States17988 Posts
On March 26 2013 06:39 Emnjay808 wrote: Does returning barb-captured workers/settlers to ai do anything for you? Like any consequences/rewards from them if you take it or return it. You get a diplomacy bonus for doing it. You can see what your relations are and the reasons for them when you mouse over the diplomacy status (Friendly/guarded/etc) in the diplomacy/trade screen with a given leader. Frankly, it almost is never worth it to return workers or settlers. Hobbling the AI and gaining workers from captured workers/settlers is basically always the better option -- especially in the early game. | ||
|
Sufficiency
Canada23833 Posts
On March 26 2013 06:39 Emnjay808 wrote: Does returning barb-captured workers/settlers to ai do anything for you? Like any consequences/rewards from them if you take it or return it. When you do that, you will get a diplomatic bonus - the AI will like you more, basically. It does have some impact on the game, but often not immediately obvious. Furthermore, as far as I know, diplomatic bonuses (as well as penalties) decay as time goes on, so if you saved Alex's worker on turn 50, he may still denounce you 100 turns later. | ||
|
screamingpalm
United States1527 Posts
| ||
|
ain
Germany786 Posts
On March 26 2013 06:43 xDaunt wrote: You get a diplomacy bonus for doing it. You can see what your relations are and the reasons for them when you mouse over the diplomacy status (Friendly/guarded/etc) in the diplomacy/trade screen with a given leader. Frankly, it almost is never worth it to return workers or settlers. Hobbling the AI and gaining workers from captured workers/settlers is basically always the better option -- especially in the early game. If it belonged to a CS, you are guaranteed a friendship and usually even get allied. This may boost your empire a lot more than the hammers for a single worker. | ||
|
Eishi_Ki
Korea (South)1667 Posts
On March 26 2013 06:16 xDaunt wrote: I understand the marketing reasons for placing women on these gaming panels, but is it really too much to ask to get one who either can actually contribute something meaningful to the conversation or simply shut up? The girl in that second demo video is spectacularly obnoxious and uninformed. You would think that if someone was going to pay her to be present, that they might expect her to know something (re: anything) about what was being discussed. That Lady Gaga segway was cringe-worthy. You can tell Ed just wants to talk about the game | ||
|
riyanme
Philippines940 Posts
| ||
|
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
Dev 1: Hey what can we add that is new but doesn't require any out of the box thinking and wouldn't piss off the UI programmers? Dev 2: Does it have to be somewhat realistic? Dev 1: No. Dev 2: Tourism. All the UI team have to do is get rid of the advisers button which nobody uses and copy the font, and color of the faith icons and rename it tourism and treat it like mini golden ages. Then slap a half finished panel stolen from the buildings UI and tada! Dev 1: Fuck yeah! Dev 2: Fuck yeah! Also Brazil's UU is a WW2 soldier... Eh? | ||
|
RoyGBiv_13
United States1275 Posts
| ||
|
ain
Germany786 Posts
On March 28 2013 03:16 {CC}StealthBlue wrote: I think Tourism was added just for filler... Also Brazil's UU is a WW2 soldier... Eh? Anything is bound to be an improvement to the current culture game. I just wish they would make borders contestable again. | ||
|
KissBlade
United States5718 Posts
| ||
|
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
| ||
|
KissBlade
United States5718 Posts
On March 29 2013 01:32 {CC}StealthBlue wrote: Isn't that what the AI already does late game no matter what the difficulty? Yes but the World Congress makes it sound like something where the AI can just change the rules at a whim. Like, HEY TRADE EMBARGO ON YOU! =( Don't worry Firaxis would never develop a functioning, let alone half-ass one, AI. | ||
|
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
On March 29 2013 03:27 KissBlade wrote: Yes but the World Congress makes it sound like something where the AI can just change the rules at a whim. Like, HEY TRADE EMBARGO ON YOU! =( Don't worry Firaxis would never develop a functioning, let alone half-ass one, AI. As if Firaxis would ever take the time to develop a functioning AI, or even a half assed one at that. | ||
|
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
Website is in Spanish: http://www.vandal.net/cgi-bin/vinot.pl?n=1350635809&i=1 | ||
|
Sufficiency
Canada23833 Posts
| ||
|
andrewlt
United States7702 Posts
| ||
|
ain
Germany786 Posts
On March 30 2013 06:20 andrewlt wrote: It seems like a civ designed to play catch-up on deity. You don't exactly want to be at war that often with a more technologically advanced civ to take advantage of that ability. My thoughts. It's going to be better the higher the difficulty is. In multiplayer it might turn out really good, because early aggression will pay off even more than usual. | ||
| ||
