EPTCivilization V + DLC's, G&K, BNW - Page 134
| Forum Index > General Games |
|
Muecke
Germany150 Posts
| ||
|
xDaunt
United States17988 Posts
| ||
|
woody60707
United States1863 Posts
| ||
|
Sub40APM
6336 Posts
On July 09 2013 12:02 xDaunt wrote: I'm happy that the game is getting all of these high scores, but I'm not sure that I'd give two shits if it didn't. I could be wrong, but I sincerely doubt that most reviewers really know enough about Civ to review it properly. i concur. even the one low review it got seemed like it was written by someone who doesnt like civ in general. "civilization 5 sucks because you fill buckets by doing actions and press next turn. also, i am not going to bother with culture and diplomacy revamp because i had a ton of money and was spamming cities because i playo n chieftan" | ||
|
Sub40APM
6336 Posts
On July 09 2013 12:03 woody60707 wrote: The thing I miss most from Civ IV was I had two ways to go USA#1 ... I was hoping the for Civ V. Couple of things I would have liked from Civ IV: more leaders, and cottages instead of trade posts because I thought they looked cooler and they way they grow as your empire grew. Although honestly Civ 5 has so many civs in it now and some of them end up being kind of mediocre -- Denmark! | ||
|
farvacola
United States18854 Posts
| ||
|
rezoacken
Canada2719 Posts
On July 09 2013 12:04 Sub40APM wrote: i concur. even the one low review it got seemed like it was written by someone who doesnt like civ in general. "civilization 5 sucks because you fill buckets by doing actions and press next turn. also, i am not going to bother with culture and diplomacy revamp because i had a ton of money and was spamming cities because i playo n chieftan" Lol wtf which one is that ? | ||
|
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
| ||
|
woody60707
United States1863 Posts
On July 09 2013 12:05 Sub40APM wrote: Couple of things I would have liked from Civ IV: more leaders, and cottages instead of trade posts because I thought they looked cooler and they way they grow as your empire grew. Although honestly Civ 5 has so many civs in it now and some of them end up being kind of mediocre -- Denmark! What's wrong with Denmark? I think that was a DLC, so I never got to play them. | ||
|
Sub40APM
6336 Posts
http://venturebeat.com/2013/07/08/civilization-v-brave-new-world-review/ my favorite part is that he gave Gods and Kings a 65...so Brave New World is 'worse' I dont know why people who dont like turn based strategies go and review them. | ||
|
Sub40APM
6336 Posts
On July 09 2013 12:13 woody60707 wrote: What's wrong with Denmark? I think that was a DLC, so I never got to play them. their unique ability is that embarked units get +1 movement and when they disembark they have one more movement. Their UU are a longsword replacement that sucks because all pre rifle non ranged units suck and a Norwegian rifle guy who is only good in hills and stuff. | ||
|
rezoacken
Canada2719 Posts
On July 09 2013 12:14 Sub40APM wrote: http://venturebeat.com/2013/07/08/civilization-v-brave-new-world-review/ my favorite part is that he gave Gods and Kings a 65...so Brave New World is 'worse' I dont know why people who dont like turn based strategies go and review them. Yeah... would be like me reviewing Soccer games. | ||
|
woody60707
United States1863 Posts
On July 09 2013 12:10 {CC}StealthBlue wrote: Everyone restart Steam and check downloads. Did it, I got nothing. Why do you ask? | ||
|
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
| ||
|
SOB_Maj_Brian
United States522 Posts
| ||
|
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
| ||
|
Sub40APM
6336 Posts
| ||
|
woody60707
United States1863 Posts
On July 09 2013 12:15 Sub40APM wrote: their unique ability is that embarked units get +1 movement and when they disembark they have one more movement. Their UU are a longsword replacement that sucks because all pre rifle non ranged units suck and a Norwegian rifle guy who is only good in hills and stuff. longsword was always kinda nichy to start with unless you are playing on epic. Great unit with no longevity. But a nice unit if you can rush to it. | ||
|
farvacola
United States18854 Posts
On July 09 2013 12:21 SOB_Maj_Brian wrote: Can someone explain why you would choose Venice over Austria, can't you just pay gold with Austria to take City States? When you pay gold to buy city states a la Austria, you are given the option to annex, and in many cases ought to. With Venice, that isn't even an option, requiring a rather different play style. | ||
|
PHILtheTANK
United States1834 Posts
| ||
| ||
