Civilization V + DLC's, G&K, BNW - Page 134

On July 09 2013 12:02 xDaunt wrote:
I'm happy that the game is getting all of these high scores, but I'm not sure that I'd give two shits if it didn't. I could be wrong, but I sincerely doubt that most reviewers really know enough about Civ to review it properly.

On July 09 2013 12:03 woody60707 wrote:
The thing I miss most from Civ IV was I had two ways to go USA#1 ... I was hoping the for Civ V.

On July 09 2013 12:04 Sub40APM wrote:

i concur. even the one low review it got seemed like it was written by someone who doesnt like civ in general. "civilization 5 sucks because you fill buckets by doing actions and press next turn. also, i am not going to bother with culture and diplomacy revamp because i had a ton of money and was spamming cities because i playo n chieftan"

On July 09 2013 12:05 Sub40APM wrote:

Couple of things I would have liked from Civ IV: more leaders, and cottages instead of trade posts because I thought they looked cooler and they way they grow as your empire grew.
Although honestly Civ 5 has so many civs in it now and some of them end up being kind of mediocre -- Denmark!

On July 09 2013 12:09 rezoacken wrote:


Lol wtf which one is that ?

On July 09 2013 12:13 woody60707 wrote:


What's wrong with Denmark? I think that was a DLC, so I never got to play them.

On July 09 2013 12:14 Sub40APM wrote:

http://venturebeat.com/2013/07/08/civilization-v-brave-new-world-review/

my favorite part is that he gave Gods and Kings a 65...so Brave New World is 'worse'
I dont know why people who dont like turn based strategies go and review them.

On July 09 2013 12:10 {CC}StealthBlue wrote:
Everyone restart Steam and check downloads.

On July 09 2013 12:15 Sub40APM wrote:

their unique ability is that embarked units get +1 movement and when they disembark they have one more movement. Their UU are a longsword replacement that sucks because all pre rifle non ranged units suck and a Norwegian rifle guy who is only good in hills and stuff.