|
On May 13 2011 04:35 cursor wrote: He is complimenting Starcraft 2 as a game, and making a point about the player pool. HENCE- the unrealized potential of the game.
You. Damn. Fools.
Too bad everyone can't see past the "bw elitism" and see this point right here.
|
Great article intrigue, Loved it.
I'm hoping one day there's an influx of guys that come over from Brood War, But That would certainly mean the death of that scene to me. JD and Flash popping over would be amazing though.
|
On May 13 2011 04:25 Chill wrote:Show nested quote +On May 13 2011 04:23 Fanatic-Templar wrote:On May 13 2011 03:48 Rinnegan5 wrote: And it's not even about BW supremacy. Intrigue provides an objective argument that you guys fail to understand because of your own biases toward SC2. Take a second and think about it logically....It's a well-articulated piece that is worthy to be called the first final edit of SC2. Right, let's look at this objectively. What's your point, Intrigue? On May 12 2011 13:32 intrigue wrote: What’s your point?
I am saying that there are 300 current pros and semi-pros that have the potential to come in and dominate SC2 at any moment, with a latency of a few months from the day they switch. Among this group there are a notable few that CRUSH any other players in terms of raw talent and/or work ethic and/or ability to learn. This knowledge cheapens any form of competition I see right now, no matter how much I try to enjoy the games.
I think that's a pretty stupid conclusion. How could you ever enjoy anything in your life knowing you're not watching the absolute best? Edit: That's not even correct. You are watching the best, but not the highest potential. That makes it even harder to enjoy anything in life. Wow that play was amazing but was it the absolute best possible play. Surely not.
Aptly put Chill, I think this captures the silliness of this entire blog. I read the whole thing and came to the conclusion of "so what?" I see amazing plays and players, they get paid well enough to do this full time, which in turn means I get to see ever more refined and amazing play. In addition, the world of SC2 is something I see as able to share with an ever larger audience of enthusiasts and not a dwindling group of hard core folks (no offense to them, I love those communities as well) which is my preference at the moment.
|
On May 13 2011 04:35 cursor wrote: He is complimenting Starcraft 2 as a game, and making a point about the player pool. HENCE- the unrealized potential of the game. Yes, and does so negatively.
I see the same exact statistics and say that when the best of the best make the switch, starcraft 2 tournaments are going be unfathomably spectacular.
It takes a really jaded perspective to see the huge likelihood that sc2 is transformed into gameplay qualities currently unimaginable and decide that's a bad thing.
|
On May 13 2011 03:44 Kazius wrote:Show nested quote +On May 13 2011 03:36 infinity2k9 wrote:On May 13 2011 03:29 windsupernova wrote:On May 13 2011 03:26 Maliris wrote:On May 13 2011 03:24 Vendor wrote:On May 13 2011 03:21 hydraden wrote:On May 13 2011 03:18 Maliris wrote:On May 13 2011 03:15 hydraden wrote:On May 13 2011 03:09 Dakorok wrote: It's an interesting take, but I maintain that SC2 is a fresh, new game. The metagame is nowhere near as defined as it was in Brood War yet. You can't compare the development stage of SC2 to BW. When BW just came out, nobody knows how to play RTS. Even Boxer did not have a good idea about how to play RTS compared to today's players. On the other hand, the people who plays SC2 now knows everything about RTS, they should be able to play SC2 to the current BW level within one year if there were no patches from Blizzard. This is very ignorant. Some of the best BW players were WC2 players back in the day. Back when BW was a fresh new game. Geez, you think I do not know those games? Ages of Empires, red alert, WC2, I played all of them 10 years ago. they were never professional games. How can you compare? Because playing those games even for fun gives you a fundamental idea of how to play RTS at even the most basic level. You don't need to do something professionally to get good at it. This goes in to saying no one knew how to play RTS games before BW which is false. Indeed. Sorry to burst your bubble, but BW was not always this hardcore RTS for god's of gaming. Saying no one knew how to play RTS when BW was released is silly. Shhh don't tell them that RTSs existed before BW. They might find out that those games were even harder mechanically than BW  *Not bashing on BW players, but I am getting tired of the argument that all RTS knowledge originated from BW. I played many RTS at the time and no infact they were not harder mechanically or strategically. And people DID suck at RTS at the time, just look at the early BW videos. 100+ APM could compete back then. People didn't understand the concepts of looking for 'macro builds' and trying how to do completely safe FE's, people didn't come into the game with 300 APM immediately trying to explore every option possible. No one could even play Terran properly for years cause it was difficult. The reason why BW metagame took so long to evolve was literally only because of mechanical difficultly. Defilers were not used for years because people simply did not have the multitasking to be able to handle so much at once effectively. No strategy is out of reach in Starcraft 2, for better or for worse. People can ,'access' lets say, any possibility; so inevitably things will be figured out much faster. Patching will be the main reason for changing strategies. You're not mentioning the fact that BW was heavily patched (up to and until the "nerf boxer" patch). What nerf Boxer patch? Do you mean the patch where they nerfed reavers? Cause that was more of a nerf Zileas patch.
|
On May 13 2011 04:31 cursor wrote:Show nested quote +On May 13 2011 04:28 Artimo wrote:On May 13 2011 04:09 Pandain wrote:I'm sorry Intrigue, and I know this will sound a bit gruff, and possibly even rude. But know that this is truly the only thing I think I can say that can express what I feel. How dare you. How dare you, entrusted with the first SC2 Final Edit in history, write such an OP. How dare you come to the oasis of Starcraft lore and culture, the basin of ESPORTS, and write this. And how dare you do this, not only as a valued member of the community, but as a moderator, and write a Final Edit defaming our players with cries of BW supremacy. Yes we know that Flash and Jaedong are by far the better players than anyone in SC2. Yes we know if any of them switched they would dominate within a week. But to say that our competition is a farce, to say that the knowledge that "They could be better" cheapens the game, that's just something I can't agree with. And really you of all people should know better. Did the knowledge that miles away, hundreds of superior Koreans lay hammering at their keyboards cheapen TSL 1&2? No, it didn't + Show Spoiler +(why am I so good at answering rhethorical questions.) What you say is undeniably true. This article is extremely well written with a superb layout. This article was interesting to read, and made me think for a bit. Hell, even the graphics are better than most of my threads. But how dare you say that what we watch isn't art. For a community that prides itself on the knowledge that we have all discovered something beautiful, something God must truly have influenced, this certainly stands in stark contrast. Yes we see players make mistakes. But we also see them in moments of genius. When MVP splits marines a grin creeps upon our face;when NesTea proxy spine crawlers we scream in amazement. Your post doesn't directly come out and say it, but it certainly does hint. You say your'e going to be called unpopular, that SC2 competition is a farce. Some people have said that the point of your thread is that SC2 will only get better when BW players come over. But I don't see that. All I see is a denouncement of Starcraft 2, and that truly disappoints me. Thank you, i was sitting a long time trying to find a good way to respond so i started reading the rest of the replies. but this underscores my exact sentiments regarding the OP. You guys gotta be trolling. Show me where he says that SC2 isn't an art? Isn't it a compliment to say that Flash and Jaedong would own face at SC2 because there is so much more left to be done, and their immense skills would shine in the game? He didn't say the game is trash or something and that skill doesn't matter. I fail to understand how so many people could completely misinterpret the article.
It's that he's saying implies that what we're watching isn't amazing. That what we watch every day, what we play every day, is a game so beautiful and sublime that we come to these forums regularly just to discuss it. He says that the players could be better, and that is true. But that doesn't mean what we're saying isn't art, and he certainly thinks he isn't. The knowledge of that is "cheapened", no matter how hard he tries to enjoy it. He liked TSL3, but he also likes a football game.
The point is this isn't a football game. Football is fun, but it lacks a certain... beauty. And Intrique, by making that comparison, implies that SC2 doesn't have that right now(because of lack of true competition.)
But I'm saying we already have art before us.
On May 13 2011 04:38 I)etox wrote:Show nested quote +On May 13 2011 04:35 cursor wrote: He is complimenting Starcraft 2 as a game, and making a point about the player pool. HENCE- the unrealized potential of the game.
You. Damn. Fools. Too bad everyone can't see past the "bw elitism" and see this point right here.
On May 13 2011 04:35 cursor wrote: He is complimenting Starcraft 2 as a game, and making a point about the player pool. HENCE- the unrealized potential of the game.
You. Damn. Fools.
And no, he's not. Read the opening paragraph. He says this is going to make him unpopular, that there will not be a "optimistic poignant hope" at the end.
Does that sound like the opening to a compliment?
|
Holy moly this thread has exploded. Nothing like a good fanwar to provide quality entertainment and increase TL page visits eh?
|
Seriously.
What is the POINT of this thread? "The Elephant in the Room". What does that even insinuate? Something like:
"Look all you SC2-fanbois, all your favourite players suck and if the "Real pros" switch over they would DESTROY them! muahahaha!"
What is the POINT? Do you people, who agree with the OP, want Flash, JD etc. to switch over or do you want SC2 to die or... what tis the actual agenda!?
|
On May 13 2011 04:28 Faveokatro wrote:Show nested quote +On May 13 2011 04:20 Jyvblamo wrote: Well, you can also quote the results of players like MVP or Moon who switched to SC2 relatively late and have done way better than Grubby. That's his whole point... that it isn't a guarantee previous RTS experience transfers over. Not that every player from another game will fail. Edit: Also, Chill brings up a good point a few posts above. Do you only watch the Superbowl and Champions League Finals? I doubt you watch every game and think "Well if BARCA was in this game they'd be dominating." Well, Barca is probably the most popular team in the world.
|
On May 13 2011 04:38 I)etox wrote:Show nested quote +On May 13 2011 04:35 cursor wrote: He is complimenting Starcraft 2 as a game, and making a point about the player pool. HENCE- the unrealized potential of the game.
You. Damn. Fools. Too bad everyone can't see past the "bw elitism" and see this point right here.
Just re-read the article, I'd like you to point out the part where he "complimented SC2 as a game". I sure as heck don't see it. All I see is an article bashing every professional SC2 player and calling the pro scene a farce. It's frankly insulting to people that enjoy it, telling them that their game is stupid because their players aren't as good as yours.
|
Calgary25988 Posts
On May 13 2011 04:38 Jampackedeon wrote:Show nested quote +On May 13 2011 04:25 Chill wrote:On May 13 2011 04:23 Fanatic-Templar wrote:On May 13 2011 03:48 Rinnegan5 wrote: And it's not even about BW supremacy. Intrigue provides an objective argument that you guys fail to understand because of your own biases toward SC2. Take a second and think about it logically....It's a well-articulated piece that is worthy to be called the first final edit of SC2. Right, let's look at this objectively. What's your point, Intrigue? On May 12 2011 13:32 intrigue wrote: What’s your point?
I am saying that there are 300 current pros and semi-pros that have the potential to come in and dominate SC2 at any moment, with a latency of a few months from the day they switch. Among this group there are a notable few that CRUSH any other players in terms of raw talent and/or work ethic and/or ability to learn. This knowledge cheapens any form of competition I see right now, no matter how much I try to enjoy the games.
I think that's a pretty stupid conclusion. How could you ever enjoy anything in your life knowing you're not watching the absolute best? Edit: That's not even correct. You are watching the best, but not the highest potential. That makes it even harder to enjoy anything in life. Wow that play was amazing but was it the absolute best possible play. Surely not. Aptly put Chill, I think this captures the silliness of this entire blog. I read the whole thing and came to the conclusion of "so what?" I see amazing plays and players, they get paid well enough to do this full time, which in turn means I get to see ever more refined and amazing play. In addition, the world of SC2 is something I see as able to share with an ever larger audience of enthusiasts and not a dwindling group of hard core folks (no offense to them, I love those communities as well) which is my preference at the moment. Well, I'm just picking at points I don't like. I think the ultimate conclusion of the article is that SC2 competition still has a long way to develop.
All the BW pros, competition farce, and lack of viewing enjoyment comes way after that main point.
People not from the BW scene may not appreciate this fact and think it's elitism, but it's pretty objective. When you see a professional play BW, they are so amazingly good that you could never even come close to executing anything they do. And that's the result of YEARS of practice for 14 hours a day, 7 days a week, 350 days a year, more or less.
SC2 will get there, and will get there faster. It's just not there yet.
|
What a great read, but maybe new SC2 players w.o any SC:BW background may misinterpret the article and think of its as an insult to SC2. Well, but the truth is SC2 can not compare to SC:BW in many aspect, but thats not our problem, thats Blizzard's problems.
Also, the artilce has some great points, like they way SC2 pro practice now, they really need to improve that if they want to lift the SC2 skill bar higher.
As an BW player but only play SC2 now, I can safely save that my love is with SC:BW forever. I may never touch SC:BW again, cos I want something new, but SC2 will never be SC:BW and blaming each others about it is pointless.
Difference game, difference start, thats all.
|
So basically, top tier BW players haven't switched over from BW to SC2, so we have a lot to look forward to? Sounds like a good thing
|
On May 13 2011 04:38 I)etox wrote:Show nested quote +On May 13 2011 04:35 cursor wrote: He is complimenting Starcraft 2 as a game, and making a point about the player pool. HENCE- the unrealized potential of the game.
You. Damn. Fools. Too bad everyone can't see past the "bw elitism" and see this point right here.
No it doesn't. Quote me one thing, literally anything in the article, that compliments sc2 as a game.
|
On May 13 2011 03:59 Turing wrote: Really well written article. I think some great points were made, but I feel like it's a bit of an invalid point that because there are people out there that could be better at this game, that the current competition is in any way less intense. If any of them switch over, great, but I'll wait for that to happen before I consider the possibility detrimental to my enjoyment whatsoever. And honestly, the last thing I want is a real bonjwa. SC2 is more exciting without knowing who's going to be in the top four or even top eight of the next GSL. I disagree completely. For me, a complete lack of consistency and predictability in the SC2 proscene is one of its biggest flaws at the moment. When a player wins the GSL and gets demoted to Code A in the very next GSL, it really cheapens the experience for me because the notion of an "upset" loses all meaning. In comparison, Bisu 3-0ing Savior was one of the most historic moments in esports and if SC2 proscene continues being the way it is, do you think we'll ever have something rivaling such moments from BW?
|
On May 13 2011 04:44 flanksteak wrote:So basically, top tier BW players haven't switched over from BW to SC2, so we have a lot to look forward to? Sounds like a good thing  If he wrote the article with this tone I bet you noone would be complaining. The problem is he's saying all the current players/tournaments/matches are crap and not valid until the top BW players switch which is not only wrong but very insulting.
|
On May 13 2011 04:42 Chill wrote:Show nested quote +On May 13 2011 04:38 Jampackedeon wrote:On May 13 2011 04:25 Chill wrote:On May 13 2011 04:23 Fanatic-Templar wrote:On May 13 2011 03:48 Rinnegan5 wrote: And it's not even about BW supremacy. Intrigue provides an objective argument that you guys fail to understand because of your own biases toward SC2. Take a second and think about it logically....It's a well-articulated piece that is worthy to be called the first final edit of SC2. Right, let's look at this objectively. What's your point, Intrigue? On May 12 2011 13:32 intrigue wrote: What’s your point?
I am saying that there are 300 current pros and semi-pros that have the potential to come in and dominate SC2 at any moment, with a latency of a few months from the day they switch. Among this group there are a notable few that CRUSH any other players in terms of raw talent and/or work ethic and/or ability to learn. This knowledge cheapens any form of competition I see right now, no matter how much I try to enjoy the games.
I think that's a pretty stupid conclusion. How could you ever enjoy anything in your life knowing you're not watching the absolute best? Edit: That's not even correct. You are watching the best, but not the highest potential. That makes it even harder to enjoy anything in life. Wow that play was amazing but was it the absolute best possible play. Surely not. Aptly put Chill, I think this captures the silliness of this entire blog. I read the whole thing and came to the conclusion of "so what?" I see amazing plays and players, they get paid well enough to do this full time, which in turn means I get to see ever more refined and amazing play. In addition, the world of SC2 is something I see as able to share with an ever larger audience of enthusiasts and not a dwindling group of hard core folks (no offense to them, I love those communities as well) which is my preference at the moment. Well, I'm just picking at points I don't like. I think the ultimate conclusion of the article is that SC2 competition still has a long way to develop. All the BW pros, competition farce, and lack of viewing enjoyment comes way after that main point.
This is true, but due to the writing and the tone established to most people it is completely taken away from when it basically calls the players currently terribad (not exactly obviously, but this is how a lot of people are taking it).
|
great post, agree completely
|
On May 13 2011 04:38 I)etox wrote:Show nested quote +On May 13 2011 04:35 cursor wrote: He is complimenting Starcraft 2 as a game, and making a point about the player pool. HENCE- the unrealized potential of the game.
You. Damn. Fools. Too bad everyone can't see past the "bw elitism" and see this point right here.
He makes a good and true point in the most dickish way possible.
|
pretty interesting article. thanks! imagine where we are going to be in 2/3 years after the expansions. the game itself will be much better and hopefully we will get more BW pros to jump ship.
|
|
|
|
|
|