Korean Music Discussion - Page 3403

Post a Reply

Prev 1 3401 3402 3403 3404 3405 5787 Next

To ensure this thread won't be closed, you must adhere to ~~several~~ a number of simple rules;

Please use spoilers when quoting a post with pictures and/or videos.
When posting large quantities of media (pictures or videos), please begin spoilering after the first piece. Grouping related videos in the same spoilers & labeling is recommended.
No reposting of old material unless justified
Posting any material with little or no relevent discussion accompanying it
No passion-induced flaming of each other because 'x said y sucked' etc.
Keep the expression hate of music individuals/groups to a minimal level
No 'pagetopping' in any form whatsoever, as it constitutes spam equal to posts similar to 'first'.
No vulgar fan fics or wet dream stories. It is creepy, weird, and it dehumanizes the people who you are here to celebrate/discuss.
Normal posting standards that you find throughout the rest of the site still apply and will be enforced more strictly from here forward (2012/03/11)

Due to the poor nature of this thread in the past, temporary two-day bans will occur more than often if people slip up.

XaI)CyRiC

United States4471 Posts

August 01 2012 00:28 GMT

#68041

On August 01 2012 08:41 TuElite wrote:

Show nested quote +

So basically what you're saying is the only thing wrong I did was use the word "strip" ? Or are all other "descriptions" wrong as well ? Just to make sure I get what you're saying.

Again, we all already understand and know that you are obsessed with Nicole and that everything about her appeals to you. There's no need for that level of detail when describing her physical appearance and how it makes you think/feel. It seems like your posts are trying to give people a glimpse of what's going on in your head when you're obsessing about Nicole while looking at her videos or pictures, and trying to show them what you see. Everyone knows generally what you're seeing and thinking when it comes to Nicole, so it's unnecessary and, I'm sorry to say, a little disturbing.

Every time I see this picture, I can't help it but sing to myself...

Hennessey hips, and Belve’ eyes
Grey Goose on her lips, and cognac thighs
She had a bubble like Cris', Patron all night
Had one mo' sip, too drunk to drive

The charms coming out of this picture put me under a spell. I'm hangover from it. Cognac thighs really puts it well. Just look at those things. They look so delicious, hypnotizing, mesmerizing. Had one more sip too drunk to drive...

The real perfection of this picture comes from the fact that it doesn't give you what you want. It just teases you. Shows you a little like "look at what I got" and then it takes it away from you.

This superb and exquisite dress fits Nicole perfectly, it had to be hand made and tailored for her. It's perfect. It's seductive, beautiful, classy and it's ambitious! Ideal for Nicole. Upon first seeing it my reaction was to take in and accept this perfection that i was seeing. Look how amazingly the dress reveals her thighs and her beautiful legs, look at how the color matches and accentuate her hair color and her skin tone. Look at that necklace, telling you that this girl ain't playing around. You have entered the high-class, this right here is the major leagues. Her perfectly done hair free falling on her side, revealing her shoulders and arms oh so seductively. You'd think I'm done right, that I've said everything, you're already thinking that this picture is perfect right ? You're satisfied ?

For this particular paragraph, you could easily have just simply stated that you thought the dress looked very good on Nicole or that she looked sexy in it (again, no need for details). You could have said that the dress made her legs look good and the color went well with her hair and makeup. You could have added that you thought the jewelry was a nice touch because it made her look classy, and that you like how it revealed her arms and shoulders. No need for all the "seductive" and "delicious" language. Your post comes off like you're trying to write a sexy slow jam or erotic poem about Nicole, and that's not okay. Keep it simple and avoid the excessive adulation/obsession.

This dress screams watch me, it wants to be watched, it wants to be stared at, every little movements taken in and analysed. You want to look at Nicole stand and pose like she does on the picture but you want to see that pose from ever possible angles. From both sides, from upfront, from behind, from up top, from underneath... Take it all in. Then you want to see it in action, you want to look at how superbly it reflects, captures and seductively amplifies every movement Nicole makes. You want to watch her walk in that dress, oh yess, I'd watch her walk for days on end... From every angle you want to see her legs move in that thing, the little voile like thing at the front moving up and down, showing her legs. You want to see her thighs brush up against it, you want to see her butt moves and bounce, beautifully tucked in that dress... You want to see her dance in it. You want to see her sit with it. You want to see her strip from it. It's truly superb.

The experience of fully taking that picture in can reveal to be quite stressful. Both physically, sexually and intellectually. To fully understand it is very much an experience, like a vision or day dream. So now, to end this post on lighter, less stressful note, I propose you the second picture. This time I won't include commentary, I want you to have it sink in by yourself, capture it's emotions, see what it does not show, let it speak to you and appreciate perfection.

This part is not okay. None of what you're picturing in your mind, how she makes you feel inside, what you want to do to her, what you want her to do to you, etc. No discussion about how her butt moves, how her thighs brush against things, wanting to see her strip, etc. Again, keep it simple and leave out the excessive adulation/obsession and fantasizing.

I know you like making very long and detailed posts that go in-depth about what you're thinking and feeling when you look at Nicole in pictures or videos, but you're going to have to do that somewhere else. I know some people like reading about your Nicole obsession, but I'm afraid it's not going to be okay anymore.

StorkHwaiting

United States3465 Posts

August 01 2012 00:44 GMT

#68042

If you changed Nicole to Precious this would practically be a Smeagol speech. Thank god Cyric is finally taking a stand on it. The creepiness is funny to a point, then it just makes you ashamed to be posting in the same thread

Ciryandor

United States3735 Posts

August 01 2012 00:49 GMT

#68043

On August 01 2012 09:44 StorkHwaiting wrote:
If you changed Nicole to Precious this would practically be a Smeagol speech. Thank god Cyric is finally taking a stand on it. The creepiness is funny to a point, then it just makes you ashamed to be posting in the same thread

And if you change Nicole to 6-Ara it could describe how spazzy a lot of posters have been about them lately... ugh, I hate CCM for fucking up their PR.

TuElite

Canada2123 Posts

August 01 2012 00:50 GMT

#68044

Alright, got you chief.

XaI)CyRiC

United States4471 Posts

August 01 2012 00:50 GMT

#68045

On August 01 2012 09:03 hai2u wrote:
fuck Hwayoung, been ruining T-ara ever since she joined and continuing to do so even after shes gone.

Have you considered what she could have done to not "ruin" T-ara when she was added to the team by their management?

The decision to add her to the group was a terrible one to begin with that set up a situation that could only have ended badly. There were more than enough members already, with more popular members like Jiyeon, Hyomin and Eunjung fighting for attention, and members who should not have been there since they brought nothing to the table like Boram and Qri. They had just reached some level of good success with everyone seeming to have found their roles in the group. What part of that scenario makes it seem like it'd be a good idea to add another member?

(Note: Contrast this with the Kara situation in which Hara and Jiyoung were added when the group was not doing well and arguably needed a shot in the arm. Plus, the group was small and there was plenty to go around even with the additions. However, even now I suspect that there was/is tension within that group that has been kept behind the scenes resulting from Hara becoming so popular after joining so late and not bringing anything to the table singing-wise. Pure speculation as to the third sentence of course.)

Despite the fact that things were going well, they brought Hwayoung out of nowhere and stuck her in the group for no reason. She wasn't needed, and the group was crowded enough already. If she turned out to be talented and beautiful, she'd have inspired envy and bitterness from the previous popular members for stealing their limelight. If she turned out to be a weak member, as she arguably did, then people would just reiterate the questions about why she was ever added in the first place and accuse her of "ruining" the group. No matter what she did, she would be accused of piggybacking off of the work that was done by the previous members.

It was a lose-lose situation from the beginning, and Hwayoung was arguably a victim of a terrible decision by her management company. There was no way she was ever going to be accepted with open arms under the circumstances she was added to the group, and a miracle if she ever managed to gain acceptance later on. Plus, I never got the impression that T-ara is a very tightly-knit group anyway. I've read reports that they rarely ever see each other and the popular members are always off doing solo projects. If true, that makes it even less likely that the Hwayoung addition would ever have really worked out.

wei2coolman

United States60033 Posts

August 01 2012 00:57 GMT

#68046

Glasfja;sdlfjdjf;skl really? Dude, I've tried sooo freaking hard to drive KMD away from the whole t-ara stuff, we've rehashed everything 10x over already >.>

I think we all agree
ccm sucks,
kks even worse.

HaXXspetten

Sweden15718 Posts

August 01 2012 00:59 GMT

#68047

well at least cyric is approaching it in a professional manner of fashion

Purpl3

United States1067 Posts

August 01 2012 00:59 GMT

#68048

On August 01 2012 09:23 wei2coolman wrote:

Show nested quote +

i don't understand the hate on her face... it's definitely different than the typical kpop idol face that everyone here likes, but i think she pulls it off very well w/ the hair style she uses.

A bad face is a bad face.

TunaBarrett

Sweden1045 Posts

August 01 2012 01:04 GMT

#68049

On August 01 2012 09:57 wei2coolman wrote:
Glasfja;sdlfjdjf;skl really? Dude, I've tried sooo freaking hard to drive KMD away from the whole t-ara stuff, we've rehashed everything 10x over already >.>

I think we all agree
ccm sucks,
kks even worse.

Look, most of the time the stuff that happens in the kpop world really isnt all that interesting. Theres new MVs and performances and shit and thats it. For months on end.

So its not really that strange that this is being discussed alot, and you can expect it to pop up for a few days longer aswell, then it will ebb away and you wont have to worry.

nichlion

United States265 Posts

August 01 2012 01:06 GMT

#68050

Hate to pull the hipster kpop card, but man Gangnam Style is going everywhere.

From T-Pain:

[image loading]

To Josh Groban:

[image loading]

It was on 4chan for the day and Gawker picked it up as well, how far will this go?

Requizen

United States33802 Posts

August 01 2012 01:06 GMT

#68051

Honestly, as much as I hate to admit it, now that I think about it the T ara drama and Gangnam Style being everywhere are the only things to be "news" in the past couple weeks or so. Tuna's right, aside from a couple MVs, there really hasn't been anything else.

/sigh, I just wish the relevant stuff wasn't boring/overplayed.