What Are You Reading 2013 - Page 163
Forum Index > Media & Entertainment |
sam!zdat
United States5559 Posts
| ||
IgnE
United States7681 Posts
| ||
123Gurke
France154 Posts
| ||
corumjhaelen
France6884 Posts
Started Ubik really great so far ! | ||
corumjhaelen
France6884 Posts
Pensées, Blaise Pascal Didn't read it through yet, but I must have read 50% at least. Should be good. Solal, Albert Cohen I was lent this, we'll see how it goes. | ||
Paljas
Germany6926 Posts
very impressive. could have read the blog instead, but reading it as a book is more enjoyable imo. rip wolfgang herrendorf currently reading: not bad so far next one: new german translation, so i decided to give it a try | ||
dmnum
Brazil6910 Posts
On December 24 2013 09:22 corumjhaelen wrote: I'm tempted to tell you to read another Dostoyevski book The Idiot I'd say. Yeah, I'd say TBK is the best one followed by The Idiot. After that comes C&P, which is also very good(the beginning and the ending especially). | ||
sam!zdat
United States5559 Posts
| ||
Shiragaku
Hong Kong4308 Posts
I would recommend reading this to music The Japanese version of the poem is also excellent. I Come and Stand at Every Door + Show Spoiler + I come and stand at every door But no one hears my silent tread I knock and yet remain unseen For I am dead, for I am dead. I'm only seven although I died In Hiroshima long ago I'm seven now as I was then When children die they do not grow. My hair was scorched by swirling flame My eyes grew dim, my eyes grew blind Death came and turned my bones to dust And that was scattered by the wind. I need no fruit, I need no rice I need no sweet, nor even bread I ask for nothing for myself For I am dead, for I am dead. All that I ask is that for peace You fight today, you fight today So that the children of this world May live and grow and laugh and play. And this poem, On Living is probably the most intense poem I have read. This dramatization of the poem is pretty badass. On Living + Show Spoiler + I Living is no laughing matter: you must live with great seriousness like a squirrel, for example- I mean without looking for something beyond and above living, I mean living must be your whole occupation. Living is no laughing matter: you must take it seriously, so much so and to such a degree that, for example, your hands tied behind your back, your back to the wall, or else in a laboratory in your white coat and safety glasses, you can die for people- even for people whose faces you've never seen, even though you know living is the most real, the most beautiful thing. I mean, you must take living so seriously that even at seventy, for example, you'll plant olive trees- and not for your children, either, but because although you fear death you don't believe it, because living, I mean, weighs heavier. II Let's say you're seriously ill, need surgery - which is to say we might not get from the white table. Even though it's impossible not to feel sad about going a little too soon, we'll still laugh at the jokes being told, we'll look out the window to see it's raining, or still wait anxiously for the latest newscast ... Let's say we're at the front- for something worth fighting for, say. There, in the first offensive, on that very day, we might fall on our face, dead. We'll know this with a curious anger, but we'll still worry ourselves to death about the outcome of the war, which could last years. Let's say we're in prison and close to fifty, and we have eighteen more years, say, before the iron doors will open. We'll still live with the outside, with its people and animals, struggle and wind- I mean with the outside beyond the walls. I mean, however and wherever we are, we must live as if we will never die. III This earth will grow cold, a star among stars and one of the smallest, a gilded mote on blue velvet- I mean this, our great earth. This earth will grow cold one day, not like a block of ice or a dead cloud even but like an empty walnut it will roll along in pitch-black space ... You must grieve for this right now -you have to feel this sorrow now- for the world must be loved this much if you're going to say "I lived" ... February, 1948 | ||
corumjhaelen
France6884 Posts
On December 25 2013 00:43 sam!zdat wrote: woooooo take that hegel!!! Nice job man Thanks, that was a daunting task, even taking into account I didn't get a great deal of what was said in it :/ It's really hard to say something intelligent about it, but I think I can safely argue that what Hegel wanted to do is incredibly ambitious, much more than what was done before and after him under the name of "Logic", at least to my (admittedly limited) understanding. A question is obviously whether he managed to do what he wanted, and that I really can't tell. But the fact that it was attempted, despite the counsciousness that language is unsufficient for the task, is in itself a lesson, take that Ludwig The criticisms and reflexions on the history of philosophy were also incredibly insightful, despite the obvious and classic reproach that Hegel's vision of history is much too nice of a narrative. Being->Nothingness->Becoming is also too strong of an argument in favor of dialectics to ignore, and the exposure of this movement (and quite a few others) was clear once I managed to put my mind to it. Also I just read Pascal's "Il a quatre laquais" fragment, this is even funnier when you just turn a page and find it... | ||
corumjhaelen
France6884 Posts
| ||
packrat386
United States5077 Posts
| ||
sam!zdat
United States5559 Posts
| ||
corumjhaelen
France6884 Posts
I can read quite a lot of stuff in English, but Hegel or Kant would probably be pushing it a lot. | ||
sam!zdat
United States5559 Posts
| ||
corumjhaelen
France6884 Posts
| ||
frogrubdown
1266 Posts
On December 25 2013 02:58 sam!zdat wrote: I am reading the cambridge companion to hegel, it's helped a lot in understanding what hegel is after especially his relationship to kant If you haven't already gotten there I recommend skipping the chapter on logic. Burbidge is clueless when it comes to Frege and Russell. | ||
sam!zdat
United States5559 Posts
corum kojeve has his own version of hegel very colored by his marxism, the way I understand it. Probably an interesting book but I wouldn't take it too seriously as strict hegel scholarship, wtf do I know though | ||
corumjhaelen
France6884 Posts
| ||
sam!zdat
United States5559 Posts
| ||
| ||