| Forum Index > Media & Entertainment |
|
antilyon
Brazil2546 Posts
On June 14 2013 12:45 Assault_1 wrote: I'm sorry this movie looks so bad lmao It looks like transformers except 10x bigger I feel bad for people who thinks that just because he know his movie classics and knows one thing or two about movies they can't appreciate a movie for what it is, just a movie. | ||
|
m4inbrain
1505 Posts
On June 14 2013 12:55 antilyon wrote: I feel bad for people who thinks that just because he know his movie classics and knows one thing or to about movies they can't appreciate a movie for what it is, just a movie. I don't. May they vegetate while i have what they're missing: fun. That thing looks like fun, and that's what it's all about for me in movies. If i want something with soul or real depth, i don't watch a fucking actionflick. It's like me saying everyone who drives around with less than 400hp in his car doesn't know what driving is and sucks in general. | ||
|
dudeman001
United States2412 Posts
I'm very excited to see what they make happen. | ||
|
Dakkas
2550 Posts
On June 14 2013 12:38 Sub40APM wrote: "guys, we have a device that can power a 100 foot tall robot, lets give it only hand to hand weapons because it will look cooler" -- Pacific Rim scientist guy. They explain why they don't just shoot all the kaijus, the kaiju blood is toxic to the environment and makes it uninhabitable. Excessive blunt force trauma is the preferred solution | ||
|
Jerubaal
United States7684 Posts
On June 14 2013 12:45 Assault_1 wrote: I'm sorry this movie looks so bad lmao It looks like transformers except 10x bigger Well the last two Transformers sucked ass and the first one was only ok, so that's fine with me. | ||
|
Talack
Canada2742 Posts
On June 14 2013 12:38 Sub40APM wrote: "guys, we have a device that can power a 100 foot tall robot, lets give it only hand to hand weapons because it will look cooler" -- Pacific Rim scientist guy. I believe the point of the robots is to subdue the monsters without killing them or spilling their blood everywhere as ranged weapon and projectiles would. Apparently the monsters blood is extremely toxic and near impossible to clean up, therefor blowing off limbs with weapons would be a disaster for the planet. | ||
|
WolfintheSheep
Canada14127 Posts
On June 14 2013 12:38 Sub40APM wrote: "guys, we have a device that can power a 100 foot tall robot, lets give it only hand to hand weapons because it will look cooler" -- Pacific Rim scientist guy. For the sake of a "science" discussion, in what scenarios can you conceive of where guns/missiles/freakin' lasers are actually effective and putting them on a 100 foot tall bipedal robot is the best option? A humanoid robot is probably the least efficient method of deploying armaments. | ||
|
antilyon
Brazil2546 Posts
On June 14 2013 13:41 WolfintheSheep wrote: For the sake of a "science" discussion, in what scenarios can you conceive of where guns/missiles/freakin' lasers are actually effective and putting them on a 100 foot tall bipedal robot is the best option? A humanoid robot is probably the least efficient method of deploying armaments. But think about how cool they'd be on a museum after the war is over. | ||
|
riotjune
United States3394 Posts
Don't know how del Toro can pull this off, but he will. They couldn't ask for a better man for the job. | ||
|
zoLo
United States5896 Posts
1 more week left. | ||
|
CptCutter
United Kingdom370 Posts
On June 14 2013 13:41 WolfintheSheep wrote: For the sake of a "science" discussion, in what scenarios can you conceive of where guns/missiles/freakin' lasers are actually effective and putting them on a 100 foot tall bipedal robot is the best option? A humanoid robot is probably the least efficient method of deploying armaments. not to mention impossible, you do know about how much they should weigh right? | ||
|
WolfintheSheep
Canada14127 Posts
On July 03 2013 09:50 CptCutter wrote: not to mention impossible, you do know about how much they should weigh right? Yeah, the Square-Cube Law basically says ants are gods of their domain, and anything over a dozen tonnes better have an entire body of water to support them. | ||
|
Rorix
357 Posts
one more week. ONE. MORE. WEEK.... | ||
|
aksfjh
United States4853 Posts
On June 14 2013 13:59 antilyon wrote: But think about how cool they'd be on a museum after the war is over. Fantastic point, imo! | ||
|
XXXSmOke
United States1333 Posts
 | ||
|
hai2u
688 Posts
| ||
|
TritaN
United States406 Posts
Yeah, this movie has huge robots and cool shit, AND is directed by someone who actually has talent. My problem was never with the "low plot, high visuals" type of movie. It was with the "low talent, low plot, high visuals" kind. | ||
|
My_Fake_Plastic_Luv
United States257 Posts
| ||
|
WolfintheSheep
Canada14127 Posts
On July 03 2013 14:04 TritaN wrote: This is the perfect example of my position when it comes to these types of movies. Normally when I make fun of the Transformers movies, people say "dude its not supposed to have a plot, its supposed to have huge robots and cool shit". Yeah, this movie has huge robots and cool shit, AND is directed by someone who actually has talent. My problem was never with the "low plot, high visuals" type of movie. It was with the "low talent, low plot, high visuals" kind. Now, the problem with Transformers wasn't the plot. It's that the plots weren't related to the huge robots and cool shit, and took up all the screen time. I still hold that the 1st Transformers movie was one of the best adaptations of the franchise I've seen (granted, it's a very low bar), simply because the first half did a proper job of establishing the "Robots in Disguise" premise and the ludicrous nature of robots turning into cars, and the second half knew to get rid of all the bullshit and give you giant robots wailing on each other. I'll agree that 2nd and 3rd were complete steaming piles of shit, though. The one thing that can make Pacific Rim a total bust for me is if the trailers are showing you literally all of the action. I expect Guillermo Del Toro to have a clue, but it wouldn't surprise me in the slightest if interpersonal issues and tacked on romance dominated 95% of the movie. On July 03 2013 14:17 My_Fake_Plastic_Luv wrote: Del Toro!!!!!! Pan's Labyrinth is in my consideration one of the best movies ever made. Why make all this Hollywood shit... PL was brilliant partially because it was original... I already know PC will contain a scene with buildings being smashed, with things punching each other over and over, a romantic side-plot with a sexy chick, two dudes arguing about what direction they should go, and some bullshit speeches about saving humanity. Goddamn, even directing talent can't save something that is essentially a remake of every-single summer blockbuster produced in the last ten years. Plus from a marketing perspective Pacific Rim doesn't not have a solid established group of characters like most of the other blockbusters have (think Iron Man, WWZ (the book, Brad Pitt), the Lone Ranger).... Prediction=flop The man directed Blade II and Hellboy II (granted, that Hellboy was a fairly good movie). I think you highly overestimate him if you believe he's above doing a summer Blockbuster. | ||
|
BigAsia
Canada451 Posts
| ||
| ||
|
|
The PondCast
WardiTV Map Contest Tou…
CranKy Ducklings
Escore
WardiTV Map Contest Tou…
OSC
Korean StarCraft League
CranKy Ducklings
WardiTV Map Contest Tou…
IPSL
WolFix vs nOmaD
dxtr13 vs Razz
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
