|
Discussing the show and past episodes is fine. Do not put things that have happened in the TV series in spoilers. However, don't spoil things from the books that may happen in future episodes. Put book spoilers in spoiler tags with a CLEAR WARNING that it is from the book. |
On November 29 2011 03:03 OptimusYale wrote:Show nested quote +On November 29 2011 01:43 Subversive wrote:On November 29 2011 01:20 Elegy wrote: How exactly would they have put new zombies in the barn anyway? Just open the door a crack and shove them in???
Doesn't seem...particularly safe.... Good point. And he said that Otis was doing that by himself... weird. through the hatch in the upstairs maybe? That's what I thought at first as well... Except it involves walking up a ladder . Good luck.
On November 29 2011 02:20 insolus wrote:Show nested quote +On November 28 2011 13:00 Arkan wrote:On November 28 2011 11:58 Darpa wrote:On November 28 2011 11:57 Slaughter wrote: Shane just lost his shit. Thank fucking god he did. He actually acted like a normal person would. Kill the walkers, take control of the situation and tell hershal and friends there isnt a damn thing they can do to make them move along. Shane is by far my favorite character at this point. I thought I was the only one that thought Shane was the only real human person there >.< I realize a lot of people dont like him, but hes upfront and has the balls to say and do what needs to be done. The world in the show isnt the same anymore and they need to change their way of thinking. Rick especially should have stood up for the group and told the guy they werent going to leave the farm. Yeah i think theyd survive longer under shane He's a bit of a hot-head and not the brightest. I'd take Rick any day.
|
On November 29 2011 02:17 Xayoz wrote: Hm. I wonder whether I was the only one secretly hoping for someone to put a bullet in Shanes back while he was spazzing out by the barn. You can certainly say that his actions make sense but that doesn't change the fact that he would be the last person in this group I'd want to spend my zombie apocalypse with. I'm rather surprised so many people actually seem to like him.
I am also wondering why hasn't anyone there point out the obvious route the survivors should take - find a nice farmhouse (or some small village) as far away from civilization as possible and wait till this thing blows over (about a year maybe?).
All in all, I have enjoyed the second season thus far. The way they solved the ordeal with the missing girl was rather nicely done (+ I actually didn't see that coming).
yeah i know, its like he is about to release all the walkers on the group maybe someone should stop him. It went well and they took them all down but still thats a risk i would rather not take. If you want to kill them just do it from the up part of the barn. I was thinking rick would shoot him in the back or just after but i guess not. That was one great mid-season episode thought.
|
shane maybe insane, but in this episode he did the right thing. u wouldnt life near that especially if u would knew the women you laid is pregnant. loved this episode finnaly some reasonable action.they know how to provoke curiosity. cant wait :D
|
On November 29 2011 04:07 Noev wrote:Show nested quote +On November 29 2011 02:17 Xayoz wrote: Hm. I wonder whether I was the only one secretly hoping for someone to put a bullet in Shanes back while he was spazzing out by the barn. You can certainly say that his actions make sense but that doesn't change the fact that he would be the last person in this group I'd want to spend my zombie apocalypse with. I'm rather surprised so many people actually seem to like him.
I am also wondering why hasn't anyone there point out the obvious route the survivors should take - find a nice farmhouse (or some small village) as far away from civilization as possible and wait till this thing blows over (about a year maybe?).
All in all, I have enjoyed the second season thus far. The way they solved the ordeal with the missing girl was rather nicely done (+ I actually didn't see that coming). yeah i know, its like he is about to release all the walkers on the group maybe someone should stop him. It went well and they took them all down but still thats a risk i would rather not take. If you want to kill them just do it from the up part of the barn. I was thinking rick would shoot him in the back or just after but i guess not. That was one great mid-season episode thought.
I don't really think there was ever any threat in releasing the zombies the way they did. After all, they had like 10 guns with more than enough ammo, and the walkers aren't exactly quick. And with them coming out single file it was never an issue.
|
On the "slow-pace" of the second season so far, it kind of makes more sense now.
They had a taste of "paradise", or at least a normal life, which we now see is going to get taken away from them. You can't establish that tranquility in one or two episodes. They let us get comfortable, just like the characters, with the pace they gave us, and then -- BAM -- Shane goes full-blown lunatic and tries to work everyone into a frenzy by literally siccing a barn-full of zombies on them.
Yeah, that's brilliant. Can't believe people are defending Shane in this thread. Really? Besides, the show has made it pretty obvious that Shane's dispute with Rick isn't "philosopical" or practical as it may sometimes seem. Shane is JEALOUS, to the point of murder -- that's the REAL motivator behind his anger with Rick. He doesn't think, and he'd rather see the group kill each other than not kill at all.
|
Shane best character on the show! Can't wait until feb 12
|
Really enjoyed the episode, and really wishing I hadn't spoiled the Sophia reveal through this thread. I have no self control when it comes to spoilers. 
Random question, I'm not at home to go back and re-watch. From the wiki write-up of the episode:
"Shane repeats that if they're not going to clear the barn, they have to leave. The two argue until Rick finally blurts out that Lori is pregnant. As Rick leaves, Shane congratulates him, only for Rick to imply that the child belongs to Shane."
What did Rick say to imply this? I don't remember getting that impression, so I must have missed it.
|
On November 29 2011 04:22 ryanAnger wrote:Show nested quote +On November 29 2011 04:07 Noev wrote:On November 29 2011 02:17 Xayoz wrote: Hm. I wonder whether I was the only one secretly hoping for someone to put a bullet in Shanes back while he was spazzing out by the barn. You can certainly say that his actions make sense but that doesn't change the fact that he would be the last person in this group I'd want to spend my zombie apocalypse with. I'm rather surprised so many people actually seem to like him.
I am also wondering why hasn't anyone there point out the obvious route the survivors should take - find a nice farmhouse (or some small village) as far away from civilization as possible and wait till this thing blows over (about a year maybe?).
All in all, I have enjoyed the second season thus far. The way they solved the ordeal with the missing girl was rather nicely done (+ I actually didn't see that coming). yeah i know, its like he is about to release all the walkers on the group maybe someone should stop him. It went well and they took them all down but still thats a risk i would rather not take. If you want to kill them just do it from the up part of the barn. I was thinking rick would shoot him in the back or just after but i guess not. That was one great mid-season episode thought. I don't really think there was ever any threat in releasing the zombies the way they did. After all, they had like 10 guns with more than enough ammo, and the walkers aren't exactly quick. And with them coming out single file it was never an issue.
The show goes for realism. That's why handing out guns is always kind of a big deal in the show. It might sound silly, but what if someone tripped? What if someone walked in front of someone else's line-of-fire? These are very legitimate concerns when handing out guns to a bunch of untrained people. The zombies only add to the danger, forcing these untrained people to make quick decisions.
What POINT was there in Shane so casually jeapordizing people's lives? To "correct their mindset"? To give them some hands-on training? BS. It was an emotionally-driven, reckless, selfish maneuver. It most clearly demonstrated out of anything in the show so far why Shane should not be leading anybody.
|
On November 29 2011 04:27 Karshe wrote:Really enjoyed the episode, and really wishing I hadn't spoiled the Sophia reveal through this thread. I have no self control when it comes to spoilers.  Random question, I'm not at home to go back and re-watch. From the wiki write-up of the episode: "Shane repeats that if they're not going to clear the barn, they have to leave. The two argue until Rick finally blurts out that Lori is pregnant. As Rick leaves, Shane congratulates him, only for Rick to imply that the child belongs to Shane." What did Rick say to imply this? I don't remember getting that impression, so I must have missed it. Yeah I'm not even going to rewatch. It didn't happen. Flat out wrong. I remember waiting to see if he would. All Rick does is pause in walking away and slightly turn and say thanks. They might mean that. Except that's reading a lot into something.
|
what an end, good episode
|
Don't want to wait til Feb ( I hope Shane gets killed
|
Was I alone in hoping Dale would actually pull the trigger in that forest scene with Shane? :o
|
Finally someone lost their cool and did something. I was afraid that they would + Show Spoiler [comic spoiler, sort of] +kill Shane off after his litte stand-off with Dale (since he dies quite early in the comics), but I'm glad they didn't. Shane is definitely my favourite character right now.
I thought the Sophia-reveal was pretty stupid, and I'm not talking about the fact that she got bitten and turned. It felt so bizarre that she just stayed in there for so long and only came out after the noise died out. I understand that they did to make more of an impact, but it felt quite silly. I would have rather they shot her in the midst of killing the other zombies and noticing it afterwards, or seeing her among the others, making them waver but then Shane blows her brains out. I guess I'm just nit-picking, but it kinda bothered me.
Oh well, it was a really good episode. Now the wait begins, I guess.
|
On November 29 2011 04:42 Bane_ wrote: Was I alone in hoping Dale would actually pull the trigger in that forest scene with Shane? :o lol, I was just hoping he would go balls out and shoot him, or just give up the guns. God, that sigh of relief when Shane walked away
|
You guys realize that Shane's made the group less safe now, right? They could have fortified the barn and kept watch on it with very little risk of exposure. And they would have been able to stay on Hershel's land. What do you think is more dangerous, staying on a farm where the only risk of walkers was the one secured in a barn they could all watch, or being on the move again?
Though I guess the safest option is to clear the zombies in the barn and then shoot Hershel if he tries to kick them off.
|
Why didn't someone shoot Shane, he was acting quite insane. Someone stated earlier that it was likely an attempt to topple Rick. Shane is a good crazy character I think the others will start to dislike that very soon and he will probably end up getting shot or leaving to return as someone more devious. Also someone said something about wanting to get into the comics, I'd advise getting the Compendium, it has all of the comics at least to my knowledge it does. They have them at Barnes and Nobel or online would probably be the best way to get one, it's kinda spendy though I might put it on my Christmas list if I wanted it.
|
On November 29 2011 02:14 n0ise wrote:Show nested quote +On November 29 2011 01:07 Mordiford wrote:On November 29 2011 00:20 n0ise wrote:On November 28 2011 22:15 Mordiford wrote:On November 28 2011 17:36 p4NDemik wrote: It's weird. I feel like the writers want us to have a strong affinity towards Rick and Dale right now, and really despise Shane, but they executed so poorly most people ended up the other way around. I personally agree that Shane woke everyone up with what he did, he was right that Hershel was being delusional and that Sophia was dead. Haven't read the comics but a) in a world that can get infested with a "zombie-virus", it's not that far-fetched to assume there is also the possibility of a vaccine, or even a cure. Not sure if it's addressed in the comics, but unless it is, anything on the subject is complete speculation. Hence, Hershel had all the reason to keep his family/friends there, as long as he made sure everyone/everything is safe. b) Sophia's status was also complete speculation up until the point where they saw she turned. As long as they're safe where they are, why not search for the child until you exhaust all options? Shane's arguments just make no sense to me. That being said, I kinda like the character, and it all played pretty well in the end (didn't predict the kid will be up in the barn). There is no cure, I don't see how it would be reasonable to expect something to bring back the living dead. A vaccine wouldn't bring back those who have already turned. An alternative for what happened in the show is present in the comics. + Show Spoiler [Not a show spoiler. Comic alternative…] +In the comic, while Hershel is trying to rope a new zombie into the barn, they all break out and kill like half his family, this makes him realize that he was wrong about the Walkers. So yes, I feel that Hershel was being delusional and incredibly stupid for leaving a barn full of zombies 5 minutes away from camp. He would eventually have had too many in there to the point where they would break out, or have fucked up putting the new ones in there. Also, had Dale hidden the guns in the swamp and had Shane not stopped him, the group would have likely suffered devastating losses if the comic incident had occurred. As for Sophia, Shane was just being realistic. After the third day, I pretty much figured she'd either has to be dead or a complete fucking badass to survive out there alone. Considering that Sophia was pretty meek and not particularly impressive in dealing with zombies it was more than likely that she was dead. Thanks for the comic alternative, seems interesting. What you say is definitely the 'probable course of events' - my point was that as long as everyone is safe (and since they survived til now by themselves with just one man handling the family zombies, I suppose they'll be safe with guns and way more manpower), why not just fucking let Hershel have his way?! Especially after he's taken care of you, after you killed his relative/friend/whatever (Otis) and so on. Accepting the possibility of "living dead" [literally corpses functioning with zero organs, vaguely excepting the brain and a few senses] means precisely that it's perfectly reasonable to also expect that after years and years, maybe, just maybe, there's the slim chance of a complete cure. Add this to the fact that Hershel was religious, and there's obvious reason in him trying to still take care of his zombiefamily. "Just in case", as he might put it. Same for Sophia - obviously her chances are slim as f (basically her only hope being to run into something/someone), but as long as you have like 20% ground left to cover and you're in a safe spot anyway - why refuse her those chances? Moving on, about Shane losing control - I don't think he went that batshit as some people believe. He saw the killing of the zombies as a necessity, so he forced the hand of the people around him instead of calling in the Council of fucking Elrond, where Rick could've probably persuaded everyone that killing the barn off isn't really necessary. So WP on his part.
This is how i feel. For someone who's trying to be a leader, he sure loses his cool and plays by emotion a lot. Sure they 'had it under control' because he gave guns to everyone, but isn't giving guns to everyone in a safe area ALREADY AN UNSAFE MOVE? Then putting everyone even if remotely in danger by unlocking a barn full of walkers. Yeah, that was obviously a 'leadership' move /sarcasm.
To me, if you're a leader, you do what is RIGHT, what needs to be done, and that meant exhausting the search for sophia because if you move on, or stop the search, and then she turns up weeks/months later as a walker or dead, or worse, alive... how shitty do you feel for abandoning her. How do you sleep at night knowing you didn't give it your all trying to find her. This is about REAL people living in an apocalypse, NOT your gun slinging zombie massacre B rate movie that everyone keeps wanting this to be. THATS why everyone is loving shane right now, not because he's actually be a leader, or showing any morale compass, but because he's being that bad ass that everyone wants to be from playing 1 too many resident evil games.
Go watch Dawn of the Dead a few more times and save us all the trouble of having to repeat ourselves over and over again about WHAT this series is about.
Also, in the Talking Dead, they actually go into detail about how Rick steps up and takes control over the Sophia part because he IS the leader and had to make the hardest decision. Killing a bunch of nobodies is easy, killing a CHILD of your own group, THAT is what 'needed' to be done. Something Shane didn't do. He never let a single walker get within 10 feet of them, but he let her within 5 ft of the entire firing squad. He didn't have the balls to do it. The true 'apocalypse' isn't the zombies, it's about the loss of HUMANITY in people as this outbreak occurs, and shane is the EXACT example, of what happens to people when they stop thinking about the greater good, and more for his own personal gain (yeah he loves Carl and Lori, but that's for his OWN selfish reasons because HE wants them, not actually because he has some deep seeded love for them. Hell he fucked Andrea in the car with NO hesitation, Yeah he must REALLY love Lori man). How anyone can support the maniac Shane and his crazed methods is beyond me but this episode is finally accelerating the plot between Rick and Shane, something I can't wait for.
The Talking Dead also address how Otis was the one who was rallying the walkers into the barn alone, AND that sophia, went missing for 2-3 days BEFORE they ever even got to the farm, THEN carl got shot, and another day or two went by before Otis and Shane went off to find the medicine, and THEN Otis got capped by Shane, taking the knowledge of a dead little girl in the barn to the grave. So no, the Farm and Hershel knew nothing of her in the barn, and guess who's fault that is. OH, Shane. Yeah, killing an innocent man to survive is obviously leader skills man. Next time they're on the road, and some walkers come by, lets just throw T-dog to them so we can escape, then Carol, then Dale, then Glen. God, how people can defend Shane's psychotic 'leadership' is beyond me.
|
How did Dale know the truth behind Shane and Otis? Is it just Dale assuming the story is bullshit because he doesn't trust Shane and thus can "read him", or are there unmentioned developments from the comics that deal with it?
|
On November 29 2011 06:27 Kazeyonoma wrote:Show nested quote +On November 29 2011 02:14 n0ise wrote:On November 29 2011 01:07 Mordiford wrote:On November 29 2011 00:20 n0ise wrote:On November 28 2011 22:15 Mordiford wrote:On November 28 2011 17:36 p4NDemik wrote: It's weird. I feel like the writers want us to have a strong affinity towards Rick and Dale right now, and really despise Shane, but they executed so poorly most people ended up the other way around. I personally agree that Shane woke everyone up with what he did, he was right that Hershel was being delusional and that Sophia was dead. Haven't read the comics but a) in a world that can get infested with a "zombie-virus", it's not that far-fetched to assume there is also the possibility of a vaccine, or even a cure. Not sure if it's addressed in the comics, but unless it is, anything on the subject is complete speculation. Hence, Hershel had all the reason to keep his family/friends there, as long as he made sure everyone/everything is safe. b) Sophia's status was also complete speculation up until the point where they saw she turned. As long as they're safe where they are, why not search for the child until you exhaust all options? Shane's arguments just make no sense to me. That being said, I kinda like the character, and it all played pretty well in the end (didn't predict the kid will be up in the barn). There is no cure, I don't see how it would be reasonable to expect something to bring back the living dead. A vaccine wouldn't bring back those who have already turned. An alternative for what happened in the show is present in the comics. + Show Spoiler [Not a show spoiler. Comic alternative…] +In the comic, while Hershel is trying to rope a new zombie into the barn, they all break out and kill like half his family, this makes him realize that he was wrong about the Walkers. So yes, I feel that Hershel was being delusional and incredibly stupid for leaving a barn full of zombies 5 minutes away from camp. He would eventually have had too many in there to the point where they would break out, or have fucked up putting the new ones in there. Also, had Dale hidden the guns in the swamp and had Shane not stopped him, the group would have likely suffered devastating losses if the comic incident had occurred. As for Sophia, Shane was just being realistic. After the third day, I pretty much figured she'd either has to be dead or a complete fucking badass to survive out there alone. Considering that Sophia was pretty meek and not particularly impressive in dealing with zombies it was more than likely that she was dead. Thanks for the comic alternative, seems interesting. What you say is definitely the 'probable course of events' - my point was that as long as everyone is safe (and since they survived til now by themselves with just one man handling the family zombies, I suppose they'll be safe with guns and way more manpower), why not just fucking let Hershel have his way?! Especially after he's taken care of you, after you killed his relative/friend/whatever (Otis) and so on. Accepting the possibility of "living dead" [literally corpses functioning with zero organs, vaguely excepting the brain and a few senses] means precisely that it's perfectly reasonable to also expect that after years and years, maybe, just maybe, there's the slim chance of a complete cure. Add this to the fact that Hershel was religious, and there's obvious reason in him trying to still take care of his zombiefamily. "Just in case", as he might put it. Same for Sophia - obviously her chances are slim as f (basically her only hope being to run into something/someone), but as long as you have like 20% ground left to cover and you're in a safe spot anyway - why refuse her those chances? Moving on, about Shane losing control - I don't think he went that batshit as some people believe. He saw the killing of the zombies as a necessity, so he forced the hand of the people around him instead of calling in the Council of fucking Elrond, where Rick could've probably persuaded everyone that killing the barn off isn't really necessary. So WP on his part. This is how i feel. For someone who's trying to be a leader, he sure loses his cool and plays by emotion a lot. Sure they 'had it under control' because he gave guns to everyone, but isn't giving guns to everyone in a safe area ALREADY AN UNSAFE MOVE? Then putting everyone even if remotely in danger by unlocking a barn full of walkers. Yeah, that was obviously a 'leadership' move /sarcasm. To me, if you're a leader, you do what is RIGHT, what needs to be done, and that meant exhausting the search for sophia because if you move on, or stop the search, and then she turns up weeks/months later as a walker or dead, or worse, alive... how shitty do you feel for abandoning her. How do you sleep at night knowing you didn't give it your all trying to find her. This is about REAL people living in an apocalypse, NOT your gun slinging zombie massacre B rate movie that everyone keeps wanting this to be. THATS why everyone is loving shane right now, not because he's actually be a leader, or showing any morale compass, but because he's being that bad ass that everyone wants to be from playing 1 too many resident evil games. Go watch Dawn of the Dead a few more times and save us all the trouble of having to repeat ourselves over and over again about WHAT this series is about. Also, in the Talking Dead, they actually go into detail about how Rick steps up and takes control over the Sophia part because he IS the leader and had to make the hardest decision. Killing a bunch of nobodies is easy, killing a CHILD of your own group, THAT is what 'needed' to be done. Something Shane didn't do. He never let a single walker get within 10 feet of them, but he let her within 5 ft of the entire firing squad. He didn't have the balls to do it. The true 'apocalypse' isn't the zombies, it's about the loss of HUMANITY in people as this outbreak occurs, and shane is the EXACT example, of what happens to people when they stop thinking about the greater good, and more for his own personal gain (yeah he loves Carl and Lori, but that's for his OWN selfish reasons because HE wants them, not actually because he has some deep seeded love for them. Hell he fucked Andrea in the car with NO hesitation, Yeah he must REALLY love Lori man). How anyone can support the maniac Shane and his crazed methods is beyond me but this episode is finally accelerating the plot between Rick and Shane, something I can't wait for. The Talking Dead also address how Otis was the one who was rallying the walkers into the barn alone, AND that sophia, went missing for 2-3 days BEFORE they ever even got to the farm, THEN carl got shot, and another day or two went by before Otis and Shane went off to find the medicine, and THEN Otis got capped by Shane, taking the knowledge of a dead little girl in the barn to the grave. So no, the Farm and Hershel knew nothing of her in the barn, and guess who's fault that is. OH, Shane. Yeah, killing an innocent man to survive is obviously leader skills man. Next time they're on the road, and some walkers come by, lets just throw T-dog to them so we can escape, then Carol, then Dale, then Glen. God, how people can defend Shane's psychotic 'leadership' is beyond me.
shane isnt a leader, and never will be...he is a survivor...he will do whatever it takes to stay alive, i thought that was established already, while rick is the leader who would put himself in danger to save someone else rather than leave them behind....pretty sure that this was exactly what they were playing at with their different views on dealing with finding sophia
|
I don't see how you could give credit to Herschel's situation. The virus KILLS the victim and then after you die it takes over some brain functions. Even if there were a cure what would it do, make the dead people not sick anymore?
|
|
|
|
|
|