|
Is it weird that I kind of want it?
|
The Xiao8 swag walk is unmatched.
|
On June 10 2016 13:29 Taf the Ghost wrote:Show nested quote +On June 10 2016 13:18 Dracolich70 wrote:On June 10 2016 13:17 Taf the Ghost wrote:On June 10 2016 13:12 PhoenixVoid wrote:On June 10 2016 13:11 Taf the Ghost wrote:On June 10 2016 13:09 shad2810 wrote: Minimum for invites to ti6 is top 8 right? Top 4, more than likely. OG, MVP & TL have secure invites already. Fnatic pretty much as well. Eh, I doubt it. All of the "scene" has been pretty far off on Valve's invite structure, when it's pretty easy (for me) to figure out how they've been operating. Top 4 is the only secure invites from this Major. Top 6 probably get it, as from TI5, Frankfurt & Shanghai, but Top 4 if you want to ensure it. Of the teams outside of the top 4 right now, TL & MVP have assured Invites. Fnatic should probably be assumed to as well. Would Valve risk 3 SEA teams at TI6? We're looking at 10 Invites, at the most. Most likely is going to be 8. Some Valve people just got a really huge headache for the next week. Top 4 from Manila will get invites. (Some Valve people had told teams at Frankfurt that top 4 was the only expected automatic invites, but they've clearly shown it to be that way since then.) OG & Newbee + 2 others. If those two others end up being MVP + TL, then all we have is 3 assured invites + Newbee. Since Valve is using some sort of system for "what you've done this year", the other Invites to note is Alliance (yes, seriously, they're probably getting a direct Invite), Fnatic, Complexity, LGD, Ehome. So we really don't have a long list. And ESL One Frankfurt should also probably give out +1 Invite. This is the same scenario that happened due to ESL One Manila and why we got 12 invites to Manila. Winning a Major is supposed to secure you an invite to all of them for the year, but OG kind of dropped the ball at Shanghai and Wings went and won ESL One Manila. If Fnatic beat Wings, Complexity would have taken their Invite spot and it would have been 8 invites. Valve had 9 or 10 teams they wanted to invite to the Manila Major as a result of the way the tournaments went, and adding a play-in section was going to increase the time-frame just that much more. The headache increases, when their catering to lesser successful regions(SEA/NA) somewhat paid off, but inherently also means that the deeper regions gets less. Especially if they decrease invites from 10 to 8.
So even if your assessment is full of logic and likelihood, they are still cornering themselves, because the next in line are not all that great(okay EG are, outside DC and CoL), and Valve by history does look at region distribution, more than who did what throughout the year.
So if it comes to direct invites it is:
NA: 2 CoL and DC. Or you can argue DC with 2 players that are winners from Shanghai didn't do enough, making it 1. SEA: 2 Fnatic and MVP China: 2!: Newbee, and ??? Ehome, LGD, and Wings have had different timings. EU: 2! - which according to you is gonna be, OG and Alliance(and somehow squeeze in TL).
In short that would give equal distribution even though China and EU are much deeper, risking T3 teams to take places from much better teams through qualifiers, due to regions.
|
It's a joke
|
Ehome is playing in open qualifiers. .
|
|
Both xiao8 and yang plays pretty good tidehu ter and both team prefers it.
|
Oh, Valve has put themselves in a rougher position, which might see ESL One Frankfurt not giving invites, we'll see which of the setups they put value on.
If they go for a Region Split setup with 8 teams, I would expect this, if LGD beats VG.R.
NA: Complexity SEA: MVP & Fnatic China: Newbee & LGD. EU: OG, TL & Alliance.
The Complexity Invite is even a stretch. With Valve losing 2 of the Top 5 teams of the Year this week, not a lot of teams really actually deserve invites if we're talking about the entirety of the year. Valve has clearly set out that "What have you done on LAN" and "What have you done this Year?" are their big criteria.
I should note I'm not a big fan of the way Valve has approached this (though it's a fully defensible position), but what they've been up to isn't some enigma or black hole of information. They've done enough to show their hand.
|
On June 10 2016 14:02 Taf the Ghost wrote: Oh, Valve has put themselves in a rougher position, which might see ESL One Frankfurt not giving invites, we'll see which of the setups they put value on.
If they go for a Region Split setup with 8 teams, I would expect this, if LGD beats VG.R.
NA: Complexity SEA: MVP & Fnatic China: Newbee & LGD. EU: OG, TL & Alliance.
The Complexity Invite is even a stretch. With Valve losing 2 of the Top 5 teams of the Year this week, not a lot of teams really actually deserve invites if we're talking about the entirety of the year. Valve has clearly set out that "What have you done on LAN" and "What have you done this Year?" are their big criteria.
I should note I'm not a big fan of the way Valve has approached this (though it's a fully defensible position), but what they've been up to isn't some enigma or black hole of information. They've done enough to show their hand.
Navi > Alliance for sure
Went further in this major, have done consistently better than alliance this patch.
Rest agree.
|
|
On June 10 2016 14:04 ch33psh33p wrote:Show nested quote +On June 10 2016 14:02 Taf the Ghost wrote: Oh, Valve has put themselves in a rougher position, which might see ESL One Frankfurt not giving invites, we'll see which of the setups they put value on.
If they go for a Region Split setup with 8 teams, I would expect this, if LGD beats VG.R.
NA: Complexity SEA: MVP & Fnatic China: Newbee & LGD. EU: OG, TL & Alliance.
The Complexity Invite is even a stretch. With Valve losing 2 of the Top 5 teams of the Year this week, not a lot of teams really actually deserve invites if we're talking about the entirety of the year. Valve has clearly set out that "What have you done on LAN" and "What have you done this Year?" are their big criteria.
I should note I'm not a big fan of the way Valve has approached this (though it's a fully defensible position), but what they've been up to isn't some enigma or black hole of information. They've done enough to show their hand. Navi > Alliance for sure Went further in this major, have done consistently better than alliance this patch. Rest agree.
Alliance won 2 International LANs. I've had to say Alliance is likely to be the "bubble" team for the last few weeks when talking about TI6 invites. With Secret & EG now removed from invites, Alliance suddenly isn't on much of a bubble. Who has the results, *over the year*, over Alliance? This is what happens when the Teams that have the most top 3 placings over the Year suddenly aren't getting invites.
|
On June 10 2016 14:02 Taf the Ghost wrote: Oh, Valve has put themselves in a rougher position, which might see ESL One Frankfurt not giving invites, we'll see which of the setups they put value on.
If they go for a Region Split setup with 8 teams, I would expect this, if LGD beats VG.R.
NA: Complexity SEA: MVP & Fnatic China: Newbee & LGD. EU: OG, TL & Alliance.
The Complexity Invite is even a stretch. With Valve losing 2 of the Top 5 teams of the Year this week, not a lot of teams really actually deserve invites if we're talking about the entirety of the year. Valve has clearly set out that "What have you done on LAN" and "What have you done this Year?" are their big criteria.
I should note I'm not a big fan of the way Valve has approached this (though it's a fully defensible position), but what they've been up to isn't some enigma or black hole of information. They've done enough to show their hand. Yes, I agree with you. At first it seemed (get top 6 at a Major and you are good(insert CoL)) like a reasonable assessment, but with so many majors, other important international tournaments with different winners due to the competition being steeper than ever, it brings the region distribution into question, as well as region guarenteed qualifers.
I would say in this field, CoL is more than a stretch and so is [A]. And when you go there, you can put into question about Fnatic, whose best position is 5-6 at Shanghai, and no important Lan wins or even secondary positions - unless they do it here.
Maybe they will solve their headaches the lazy way and expand teams participating, and invite 12 once again.
|
On June 10 2016 13:48 Dracolich70 wrote:Show nested quote +On June 10 2016 13:29 Taf the Ghost wrote:On June 10 2016 13:18 Dracolich70 wrote:On June 10 2016 13:17 Taf the Ghost wrote:On June 10 2016 13:12 PhoenixVoid wrote:On June 10 2016 13:11 Taf the Ghost wrote:On June 10 2016 13:09 shad2810 wrote: Minimum for invites to ti6 is top 8 right? Top 4, more than likely. OG, MVP & TL have secure invites already. Fnatic pretty much as well. https://twitter.com/BTSGoDz/status/740526933935431680 Eh, I doubt it. All of the "scene" has been pretty far off on Valve's invite structure, when it's pretty easy (for me) to figure out how they've been operating. Top 4 is the only secure invites from this Major. Top 6 probably get it, as from TI5, Frankfurt & Shanghai, but Top 4 if you want to ensure it. Of the teams outside of the top 4 right now, TL & MVP have assured Invites. Fnatic should probably be assumed to as well. Would Valve risk 3 SEA teams at TI6? We're looking at 10 Invites, at the most. Most likely is going to be 8. Some Valve people just got a really huge headache for the next week. Top 4 from Manila will get invites. (Some Valve people had told teams at Frankfurt that top 4 was the only expected automatic invites, but they've clearly shown it to be that way since then.) OG & Newbee + 2 others. If those two others end up being MVP + TL, then all we have is 3 assured invites + Newbee. Since Valve is using some sort of system for "what you've done this year", the other Invites to note is Alliance (yes, seriously, they're probably getting a direct Invite), Fnatic, Complexity, LGD, Ehome. So we really don't have a long list. And ESL One Frankfurt should also probably give out +1 Invite. This is the same scenario that happened due to ESL One Manila and why we got 12 invites to Manila. Winning a Major is supposed to secure you an invite to all of them for the year, but OG kind of dropped the ball at Shanghai and Wings went and won ESL One Manila. If Fnatic beat Wings, Complexity would have taken their Invite spot and it would have been 8 invites. Valve had 9 or 10 teams they wanted to invite to the Manila Major as a result of the way the tournaments went, and adding a play-in section was going to increase the time-frame just that much more. The headache increases, when their catering to lesser successful regions(SEA/NA) somewhat paid off, but inherently also means that the deeper regions gets less. So even if your assessment is full of logic and likelihood, they are still cornering themselves, because the next in line are not all that great(okay EG are, outside DC and CoL), and Valve by history does look at region distribution, more than who did what throughout the year. So if it comes to direct invites it is: NA: 2 CoL and DC. Or you can argue DC with 2 players that are winners from Shanghai didn't do enough, making it 1. SEA: 2 Fnatic and MVP China: 2!: Newbee, and ??? Ehome, LGD, and Wings have had different timings. EU: 2! - which according to you is gonna be, OG and Alliance(and somehow squeeze in TL). In short that would give equal distribution even though China and EU are much deeper, risking T3 teams to take places from much better teams through qualifiers, due to regions. This is my invite list for the case of 10 invite SEA: 2, Fnatic and MVP deserve an invite by any measure. But the problem is the qualifier teams from SEA will be very underwhelming.. China: 2, LGD and Newbee will be invited, EU:3, OG, Liquid, Navi for sure NA: 1, yes, I think only DC deserves an invite.
It depends on how valve value each region, there might be a coin toss between Complexity, Alliance and VGR. 2 of them will get the invite.
I think it will be a good idea to merge the qualifier with wild card. What I mean is take top 2 team from each regional qualifier and put them in a wild card tournament to eliminate the worst 2. In this way, valve can save the ass of the big names (Secret EG VG and Ehome) and keep the weaker teams from sneaking through the qualifiers in the weaker region.
|
On June 10 2016 14:07 Taf the Ghost wrote:Show nested quote +On June 10 2016 14:04 ch33psh33p wrote:On June 10 2016 14:02 Taf the Ghost wrote: Oh, Valve has put themselves in a rougher position, which might see ESL One Frankfurt not giving invites, we'll see which of the setups they put value on.
If they go for a Region Split setup with 8 teams, I would expect this, if LGD beats VG.R.
NA: Complexity SEA: MVP & Fnatic China: Newbee & LGD. EU: OG, TL & Alliance.
The Complexity Invite is even a stretch. With Valve losing 2 of the Top 5 teams of the Year this week, not a lot of teams really actually deserve invites if we're talking about the entirety of the year. Valve has clearly set out that "What have you done on LAN" and "What have you done this Year?" are their big criteria.
I should note I'm not a big fan of the way Valve has approached this (though it's a fully defensible position), but what they've been up to isn't some enigma or black hole of information. They've done enough to show their hand. Navi > Alliance for sure Went further in this major, have done consistently better than alliance this patch. Rest agree. Alliance won 2 International LANs. I've had to say Alliance is likely to be the "bubble" team for the last few weeks when talking about TI6 invites. With Secret & EG now removed from invites, Alliance suddenly isn't on much of a bubble. Who has the results, *over the year*, over Alliance? This is what happens when the Teams that have the most top 3 placings over the Year suddenly aren't getting invites.
Problem is with the major system its highly unlikely Valve still looks at "over the year" versus recent performance. Based on invites to all 3 majors, recent performance matters A LOT more than "over the year". No reason to expect TI to be any different.
|
On June 10 2016 14:09 ch33psh33p wrote:Show nested quote +On June 10 2016 14:07 Taf the Ghost wrote:On June 10 2016 14:04 ch33psh33p wrote:On June 10 2016 14:02 Taf the Ghost wrote: Oh, Valve has put themselves in a rougher position, which might see ESL One Frankfurt not giving invites, we'll see which of the setups they put value on.
If they go for a Region Split setup with 8 teams, I would expect this, if LGD beats VG.R.
NA: Complexity SEA: MVP & Fnatic China: Newbee & LGD. EU: OG, TL & Alliance.
The Complexity Invite is even a stretch. With Valve losing 2 of the Top 5 teams of the Year this week, not a lot of teams really actually deserve invites if we're talking about the entirety of the year. Valve has clearly set out that "What have you done on LAN" and "What have you done this Year?" are their big criteria.
I should note I'm not a big fan of the way Valve has approached this (though it's a fully defensible position), but what they've been up to isn't some enigma or black hole of information. They've done enough to show their hand. Navi > Alliance for sure Went further in this major, have done consistently better than alliance this patch. Rest agree. Alliance won 2 International LANs. I've had to say Alliance is likely to be the "bubble" team for the last few weeks when talking about TI6 invites. With Secret & EG now removed from invites, Alliance suddenly isn't on much of a bubble. Who has the results, *over the year*, over Alliance? This is what happens when the Teams that have the most top 3 placings over the Year suddenly aren't getting invites. Problem is with the major system its highly unlikely Valve still looks at "over the year" versus recent performance. Based on invites to all 3 majors, recent performance matters A LOT more than "over the year". No reason to expect TI to be any different.
We got 12 invites to Manila specifically because of the *year*. They said as much in their statement about the invites. Na'Vi & LGD got invites because they needed 2 more invites, since they wanted 10 or so.
Also, they care about the recent results that are LAN victories. There's only 1 LAN between now and Open Qualifiers.
A 2nd place at ESL One Frankfurt by Vega could grab them an invite, though. (They got 2nd at WePlay)
|
was jugg glimpsed during omnislash?
|
This is gonna sound dumb but would the armless health increase cause a heal through tether? O.o
|
On June 10 2016 14:08 CxWiLL wrote:Show nested quote +On June 10 2016 13:48 Dracolich70 wrote:On June 10 2016 13:29 Taf the Ghost wrote:On June 10 2016 13:18 Dracolich70 wrote:On June 10 2016 13:17 Taf the Ghost wrote:On June 10 2016 13:12 PhoenixVoid wrote:On June 10 2016 13:11 Taf the Ghost wrote:On June 10 2016 13:09 shad2810 wrote: Minimum for invites to ti6 is top 8 right? Top 4, more than likely. OG, MVP & TL have secure invites already. Fnatic pretty much as well. https://twitter.com/BTSGoDz/status/740526933935431680 Eh, I doubt it. All of the "scene" has been pretty far off on Valve's invite structure, when it's pretty easy (for me) to figure out how they've been operating. Top 4 is the only secure invites from this Major. Top 6 probably get it, as from TI5, Frankfurt & Shanghai, but Top 4 if you want to ensure it. Of the teams outside of the top 4 right now, TL & MVP have assured Invites. Fnatic should probably be assumed to as well. Would Valve risk 3 SEA teams at TI6? We're looking at 10 Invites, at the most. Most likely is going to be 8. Some Valve people just got a really huge headache for the next week. Top 4 from Manila will get invites. (Some Valve people had told teams at Frankfurt that top 4 was the only expected automatic invites, but they've clearly shown it to be that way since then.) OG & Newbee + 2 others. If those two others end up being MVP + TL, then all we have is 3 assured invites + Newbee. Since Valve is using some sort of system for "what you've done this year", the other Invites to note is Alliance (yes, seriously, they're probably getting a direct Invite), Fnatic, Complexity, LGD, Ehome. So we really don't have a long list. And ESL One Frankfurt should also probably give out +1 Invite. This is the same scenario that happened due to ESL One Manila and why we got 12 invites to Manila. Winning a Major is supposed to secure you an invite to all of them for the year, but OG kind of dropped the ball at Shanghai and Wings went and won ESL One Manila. If Fnatic beat Wings, Complexity would have taken their Invite spot and it would have been 8 invites. Valve had 9 or 10 teams they wanted to invite to the Manila Major as a result of the way the tournaments went, and adding a play-in section was going to increase the time-frame just that much more. The headache increases, when their catering to lesser successful regions(SEA/NA) somewhat paid off, but inherently also means that the deeper regions gets less. So even if your assessment is full of logic and likelihood, they are still cornering themselves, because the next in line are not all that great(okay EG are, outside DC and CoL), and Valve by history does look at region distribution, more than who did what throughout the year. So if it comes to direct invites it is: NA: 2 CoL and DC. Or you can argue DC with 2 players that are winners from Shanghai didn't do enough, making it 1. SEA: 2 Fnatic and MVP China: 2!: Newbee, and ??? Ehome, LGD, and Wings have had different timings. EU: 2! - which according to you is gonna be, OG and Alliance(and somehow squeeze in TL). In short that would give equal distribution even though China and EU are much deeper, risking T3 teams to take places from much better teams through qualifiers, due to regions. This is my invite list for the case of 10 invite SEA: 2, Fnatic and MVP deserve an invite by any measure. But the problem is the qualifier teams from SEA will be very underwhelming.. China: 2, LGD and Newbee will be invited, EU:3, OG, Liquid, Navi for sure NA: 1, yes, I think only DC deserves an invite. It depends on how valve value each region, there might be a coin toss between Complexity, Alliance and VGR. 2 of them will get the invite. I think it will be a good idea to merge the qualifier with wild card. What I mean is take top 2 team from each regional qualifier and put them in a wild card tournament to eliminate the worst 2. In this way, valve can save the ass of the big names (Secret EG VG and Ehome) and keep the weaker teams from sneaking through the qualifiers in the weaker region. Outside Na'vi, I agree. I think the qualifier into wild card is a great idea, that would solve a lot, but it would mean a lot of smaller teams and Valve need to house several teams that not going any further, since this is not settled by qualifier.
|
|
Looks like not many people care about this series. Me neither, in all honesty. These teams are almost as boring as Liquid
|
|
|
|