Dota Pit S3 - Page 23

Roles are not interchangeable no matter what the Consensus Difficulty Level of Role is.

On February 26 2015 05:32 Thetwinmasters wrote:
echo slam on his own team and a bladefury jugg lmfao

On February 26 2015 05:06 FHDH wrote:

Not sure how you came to your premise or conclusion.

On February 26 2015 04:55 FHDH wrote:
It wasn't good enough. That's why he's back mid.

you're acting like they're drafting around rtz's weakness of only playing mids and forcing s4 to swap to the safelane or kky to playing support
as if sf or whatever mid hero isn't supposed to played mid, or as if they picked sf only to suit rtz's limited hero pool

by that regard it's equivalent to saying ppy played awful at lane supports, ergo he's only drafting himself enigma, chen and other jungle 4 heroes.
it's just conjecture on your behalf and a fallacy of self fulfillment.

On February 26 2015 05:40 SKC wrote:
The only team that relies on safelane carries in this meta is C9. We just had two games where both teams had pos 1 mids.

On February 26 2015 05:42 FHDH wrote:

What in the fuck...?

If you mean "only c9 exclusively runs their carry from safelane" you're wrong because they don't. If you mean "most teams are running their carries from mid primarily" you're laughably wrong.

What even is this.

On February 26 2015 05:38 FHDH wrote:

This is a lot of words to try and place your opinion above mine with no actual counterargument or direct refutation.

On February 26 2015 05:38 FHDH wrote:
I'm aware Kuroky is a world-class support. I still haven't forgiven everyone involved at Na'Vi for Kuroky's exit. And yeah I would rather have had things stay the way they were but with Zai offlane but I was tentatively supportive of this change with the stipulation that Arteezy could actually play safelane carries. Because safelane carries are really goddamned strong in this meta. Which is why teams are relying on them primarily. My point is that a lot of players had to adjust to Arteezy because he couldn't hack it at safelane. And they did try. It didn't work.

Also you used this 2013 line twice in two threads in two minutes or so. People laughed at EE more recently than 2013, just have to point that out.

On February 26 2015 05:45 andyrau wrote:

it's really not as i dont really have an opinion
i'm just saying your statement is invalid because it's a foregone conclusion based on reddit tier superficial observation of lane swapping and extrapolating
i've said this like 3 times in different ways now i hope this is direct enough

well actually i do have an opinion and it's 'your statement makes no sense'

On February 26 2015 05:50 goody153 wrote:

Many laugh at EE what's new? Whether he improved it wouldn't matter people think how he interacts == how he approaches the game.

2013 line is correct though. Back that time a safelaner is a safelaner and a midlaner is a midlaner. You still think that safelaning necesarilly means that you are the carry. When a core is safelaned it just means they are securing farm for him early on. You still see the game that way it is 2013.

On February 26 2015 05:54 FHDH wrote:

And this is some Reddit-level, fedora-tipping invalidation basically along the lines of the last thing you said.

Trying to say anything around here is like watching a game sand saying "player X is a bad carry" and some people go "well this is one game and he is being pressured and you are an idiot" and no matter how much substantiation you have for what you're saying someone always wants you to reach deeper before you're allowed to have your opinion, which you're still wrong about and an idiot even if you produce an encyclopedia of backup for your statement.

On February 26 2015 05:55 the`postman wrote:


Except that you're blatantly wrong, like you are in every topic you post in.

On February 26 2015 05:54 FHDH wrote:

And this is some Reddit-level, fedora-tipping invalidation basically along the lines of the last thing you said.

Trying to say anything around here is like watching a game sand saying "player X is a bad carry" and some people go "well this is one game and he is being pressured and you are an idiot" and no matter how much substantiation you have for what you're saying someone always wants you to reach deeper before you're allowed to have your opinion, which you're still wrong about and an idiot even if you produce an encyclopedia of backup for your statement.