[LP] The Liquipedia Dota 2 Wiki - Page 3

On September 09 2012 23:30 ZEEEPh wrote:

this ideia occured to me while seeing the coL team page, where the former monkey business team was in the same place as former players from the actual team. someting like "former monkey business" or something in that line of thought. i can try and think of something more useful and clear, if it's not that useless and confusing

On September 10 2012 13:37 spaceG wrote:

Check out my User Page ( http://wiki.teamliquid.net/dota2/User:SpaceG ), I tried some stuff. Let me know if you like it / how you would change it.

I put it on the following pages as well but they're still pending so you gotta log in or wait till someone approves to see it:
http://wiki.teamliquid.net/dota2/Quantic_Gaming http://wiki.teamliquid.net/dota2/Meet_Your_Makers http://wiki.teamliquid.net/dota2/Natus_Vincere http://wiki.teamliquid.net/dota2/Fnatic http://wiki.teamliquid.net/dota2/Natural_9

On September 10 2012 18:02 ZEEEPh wrote:

yeap, that's what i was thinking.
imo, there is no need for a active squad former members, that could be implied in the former members since the others are listed as a former squad, but with a little bit more polishment that could get really neat
good job!

On September 10 2012 22:18 spaceG wrote:

Well there is, if you check Quantic for example it wouldn't make much sense including Mikey/Solara/Lasthitmagic in the Danish squad.

On September 12 2012 02:29 Implenia wrote:
can someone finally accept my changes?? http://wiki.teamliquid.net/dota2/4PL_Play4Dota2/2012/10#Results

It really pisses me off when I spend the time updating it as fast as possible when the no one gives a shit.

On September 12 2012 10:05 GreYMisT wrote:
I contributed to things! Im a helpful memeber!

On September 15 2012 19:07 Kasto wrote:
I'd imagine that's up to us

On September 25 2012 08:27 galtdunn wrote:
Ok got a suggestion for all item pages.
Currently there is a section called "Recommended Heroes".
I think this should be eventually upgraded to have 3 sections, being

1. Necessary on these heroes every game.-----ex: blink dagger in ES
2. Viable on these heroes every game
not necessarily optimal ---------------------------------- ex: desolator on mirana
3. Situational on these heroes, not
necessary and even bad some games ------------ex: shadow blade on tiny

Because right now there are items like blink dagger where 27 heroes are recommended for this item. People new to the game might get the impression that they're playing the game wrong if they don't get a blink dagger.

Sections would clear this stuff up I think.

On September 26 2012 03:42 Bumblebee wrote:

That's exactly what the current system has. Starting, early, core and luxury items? ^^;

On September 26 2012 06:14 galtdunn wrote:

I think you're talking about the recommended items provided in the actual game that have been transposed to LP under the hero section.

I suppose these are similar to what I'm suggesting. I guess at the heart of my question I'm just wondering where we draw the line between what goes on the page of the item as opposed to the page of the hero.
Related to this: how much strategy/discussion belongs on the hero page before you're making an entire guide?

As a contributor I'm just not sure and there aren't guidelines yet.

On September 26 2012 06:18 rabidch wrote:

i think the idea is good. one of the reasons i havent touched any of the recommended items is theres no guidance on it

i think guides are personal opinions, recommendations are more widespread behavior that you see in random games besides your own

On September 26 2012 13:17 galtdunn wrote:


I agree, but then I would say that you should attempt to explain the widespread behavior through analysis. But there's that line again of how much is too much.