EPTRating Diablo 3 - Page 4
| Forum Index > Diablo 3 |
|
Kpaxlol
813 Posts
| ||
|
HeeroFX
United States2704 Posts
| ||
|
Alpino
Brazil4390 Posts
On April 20 2012 15:10 sc4k wrote: -5. I'm glad they make such an effort to make this game a horrific embarrassment that looks like a Warcraft III UMS, with bouncy movement and WoW-y graphics, otherwise I would have sunk 100-200 hours on this easy. As it happens, I won't even bat an eyelid when it's released. Phew. My stepfather always told my mother that one of her problems while raising me and my sisters was that she overexaggerated to the point we didn't believe her threats of hanging us by our genitals in the cloth drier. You're doing that, I think you'll buy the game. On April 20 2012 13:21 Protocon wrote: 3 Stars. Played the beta and i'm not impressed. They simplified this game so much, even babies can play this. D3 is catering too hard for casuals. Gonna still play though to prove myself right or wrong. We shall see. Hate to point out the obvious, but your first real threat in d2normal is duriel. But it is casual indeed, hopefully inferno is what they promised. | ||
|
frontliner2
Netherlands844 Posts
 http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=290762 | ||
|
Stabby.aus
Australia94 Posts
| ||
|
NotSorry
United States6722 Posts
| ||
|
nihlon
Sweden5581 Posts
On April 20 2012 23:42 NotSorry wrote: pretty much everyone in this thread is admitting the game looks super causal but putting all hopes that inferno will be something special...why should you have to beat the game 3 times and get to lvl 60 just to not be on my little pony island? Ponies are underrated. | ||
|
Solai
204 Posts
For now the only thing I don't really like is the wizard. When I came into the beta it flowed really well, the abilities were just right. But now they have screwed around with the order in which you get the skills and it feels a bit off. Frostbeam is especially disappointing and the class didnt feel that good at 13 neither. Maybe it will get better with a higher level, but for now the wizard is at then end of my list to play. | ||
|
TheFish7
United States2824 Posts
I also want to say that as someone who played D1 when it first came out, I am saddened by the ever increasing cartoonishness of the diablo series. This is more of a stylistic preference than a gameplay one, so its minor. D3 does look to have a decent amount of gore, I just hope Hell is as nightmarish as it should be, and not filled with silly WoW monsters. | ||
|
Alpino
Brazil4390 Posts
On April 20 2012 23:42 NotSorry wrote: pretty much everyone in this thread is admitting the game looks super causal but putting all hopes that inferno will be something special...why should you have to beat the game 3 times and get to lvl 60 just to not be on my little pony island? I like watching waves of monsters go boom. I find that everyone who complains about the design did not pay attention to the beautifully done Grotesque. Maggot Explosion? CHECK | ||
|
KalWarkov
Germany4126 Posts
therefore, i have to go with 5/5. because diablo 2 is out of scale. | ||
|
{ToT}ColmA
Japan3260 Posts
d1 / d2 were so easy but oh well, at least there is something to complain about lolz | ||
|
rezoacken
Canada2719 Posts
On April 20 2012 23:42 NotSorry wrote: pretty much everyone in this thread is admitting the game looks super causal but putting all hopes that inferno will be something special...why should you have to beat the game 3 times and get to lvl 60 just to not be on my little pony island? I'm pretty sure people hope the game gets somewhat challenging before Inferno. Not impossible but something like D2 at the very least. D2 was easy especially normal and nightmare but still I agree D3 beta is really super easy. | ||
|
nihlon
Sweden5581 Posts
On April 21 2012 02:10 {ToT}ColmA wrote: so the game goes to what....end of act 1?! and people can talk about what it will be in other difficulties? O.o d1 / d2 were so easy but oh well, at least there is something to complain about lolz It's not even the end of act 1. I'm not sure how far into the act it goes but the end boss is not the skeleton king . | ||
|
Vilonis
United States130 Posts
| ||
|
NotSorry
United States6722 Posts
On April 21 2012 03:44 Vilonis wrote: 4. This is a game I would not play alone (I got a beta invite the other day and have not killed the skeleton king. meh). However, I think that playing with a few friends will be alot of fun! I don't get how you could give a game a 4 out of 5, then go on to say I would never play this, but if my friends or playing I wouldn't mind the game so much as long as I get to spend time with them? Isn't that much more of a 2-3 average at best? A 4 out of 5 generally means this game is really fucking good with a few slight flaws that could be easily fixed. | ||
|
zJayy962
1363 Posts
On April 21 2012 03:50 NotSorry wrote: I don't get how you could give a game a 4 out of 5, then go on to say I would never play this, but if my friends or playing I wouldn't mind the game so much as long as I get to spend time with them? Isn't that much more of a 2-3 average at best? A 4 out of 5 generally means this game is really fucking good with a few slight flaws that could be easily fixed. Depends on the person IMO. An example would be if he could only play games that are 5's without the need of company | ||
|
Mistakes
United States1102 Posts
| ||
|
willoc
Canada1530 Posts
| ||
|
Vilonis
United States130 Posts
On April 21 2012 03:50 NotSorry wrote: I don't get how you could give a game a 4 out of 5, then go on to say I would never play this, but if my friends or playing I wouldn't mind the game so much as long as I get to spend time with them? Isn't that much more of a 2-3 average at best? A 4 out of 5 generally means this game is really fucking good with a few slight flaws that could be easily fixed. Because I feel that the game gets more than double as fun when you get a second person playing with you. I think that it will have a rating of a 4 playing with a friend. | ||
| ||
