|
thanks guys!! I'm going to go with antec 300+ Show Spoiler +(good price, and i'm not gonna be really advanced and OC + my small apartment room probably doesn't want a huge case for convenience issues) probably take the advice and go with 2 sticks instead of maxing out my mobo's 4 slots.
EDIT: all the GPU recommendations are pretty expensive o.O, my budget for GPU is like $100 ~ $150, maybe its a misunderstanding, but i searched up 5770, 5750, GTX 285, they're all 200+
|
Oh can you explain why I need a stronger psu?
550W should be sufficient?
|
On October 23 2009 12:34 OmgIRok wrote:Oh can you explain why I need a stronger psu? 550W should be sufficient?
You really shouldn't look at the overall wattage but rather the +12v rail(s). any good psu should have like +35w and up.
Also because you said your budget as far as graphics cards go, you can always go with a 4870 (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814161294&cm_re=4870-_-14-161-294-_-Product) they overclock VERY well and if you get EVGA's voltmod utility and an unlocker patch, you can increase the volts and reach ~900mhz on the core.
|
I don't know where you are searching for 5750 and 70, but that definitely shouldn't be 200+, those two are only supposed to be marginally more expensive than 4870. A quick search on Newegg shows ~140 prices for the 5750 and ~160 for 5770, given that you won't be trying to overclock much, dx11 and a better power and noise profile sounds better than a slight performance boost. As for the GPU budget, what about my suggestion to go for a lower end CPU? An i5 is a really powerful solution, but even with cheaper mobos that will dial up to ~$300. If you don't do work in the particular area, it is just as viable to get a less powerful CPU and shift that toward a better graphics card, especially if you don't want to upgrade.
|
On October 23 2009 12:48 Ecael wrote: I don't know where you are searching for 5750 and 70, but that definitely shouldn't be 200+, those two are only supposed to be marginally more expensive than 4870. A quick search on Newegg shows ~140 prices for the 5750 and ~160 for 5770, given that you won't be trying to overclock much, dx11 and a better power and noise profile sounds better than a slight performance boost. As for the GPU budget, what about my suggestion to go for a lower end CPU? An i5 is a really powerful solution, but even with cheaper mobos that will dial up to ~$300. If you don't do work in the particular area, it is just as viable to get a less powerful CPU and shift that toward a better graphics card, especially if you don't want to upgrade.
So the 5750/5770 has DX11, and then i'll only get 4gb RAM, and the money saved will give me enough on my budget to up my PSU?
|
If you go for 4gig ram instead of 8gig, pending on what kind of ram you were thinking of, that will free up about 60~80+ bucks right there. That should be more than enough to give you a better PSU, assuming you don't need money rightaway and rebates are viable. That probably won't completely cover up the hole from going with a 4870 (assuming 512mb) to 5770, but the difference should be fairly insignificant. If you went with an 1gig 4870 then this should even mean savings.
Keep in mind though, a 5770 will not be quite as powerful as a 4870, but the two are quite close in terms of performance. If you go with a 5770, you will pretty much be paying a little more for a better power consumption, noise profile and dx11. With luck, the last might be huge, but we all know how dx10 turned out :p
|
Yea, i was informed about dx11, and i was like "so... its just dx11"... but then he told me "...DX11"
makes me feel uneasy but i dont really need the extra performance so i'm going 5770 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44632/446320620b2797481b98f0248bf47d03f83e2600" alt=""
Thanks for the help :p<3
|
If possible, could you post the details of what you'll be getting? I am somewhat curious as to how such a setup will look like and cost, just as a comparison to the kind of build that I have in mind.
|
|
just in case you didnt notice that specific 300 doesnt come with the two front fans only the light up led one does and it's about $10 more. though i guess you could buy the fans separately (or none at all); your 5770 might appreciate the extra air
|
What are the advantages of having a dx11 card? What features and stuff does dx11 provide?
|
On October 24 2009 09:54 Drowsy wrote: What are the advantages of having a dx11 card? What features and stuff does dx11 provide?
Hardware tesselation support and megatexturing.
|
OS: Windows XP Home Edition SP2 CPU: Intel Pentium 4, 2800 MHz Memory: 512MB RAM Graphics: XFX-HD-465X-ZPF2 Raedon HD 4650 1GB 128-bit DDR2 AGP 8x Hard Drives: 1 hard disks - 149GB Left PSU: Antec Basiq 430W errrr help can i run?
|
In all likelihood, no. The processor and ram are both relics of days passed, the 4650 might be able to handle everything on the lowest settings, but I'd guess barely even then.
|
On October 24 2009 10:13 ghermination wrote:Show nested quote +On October 24 2009 09:54 Drowsy wrote: What are the advantages of having a dx11 card? What features and stuff does dx11 provide? Hardware tesselation support and megatexturing. And what are those in non-technical terms?
|
Thing that might or might not be used in games of the future that might make the game look better, maybe, probably.
|
One thing I haven't seen in the parts of this thread that I've been reading, what are people's thoughts on SSDs?
I'm in the preliminary stages of researching and I'm wondering why I would spend $150 more on a core i7 which will probably be half idle 90% of the time on nearly every game for the next couple years, when I could get a late model core 2 duo, a cheaper motherboard and an Intel SSD 80G instead of a platter disk and just mount my other server for file storage. With random seek times on the order of negligent, no heat, no noise, will I come out ahead?
Keep in mind my goal here is SC2 with great quality. I'm not an FPS player and I won't be in line for the next crysis.
|
Versus processors and GPU, which have very defined released dates and scale, SSDs don't have that advantage. It isn't exactly unreasonable to think that simply by waiting a bit more we'll get better bargains or higher performance from new products considering how recently the SSD boom started. Moreover, most of the SSDs offered are on an enterprise rather than enthusiast level, let along mainstream consumer. Compare that to an i7 920, where the next step up is a 975 (Why would anyone bother with a 950 at that...) and the eventual hexacores, you are guaranteed to be able to build systems about that and stay at the top. That rather defines the trend of thought for me, in essence, even if SSDs offer top performance boost, I'd go with an i7 over it because I can follow that up with a future SSD of guaranteed lower price/better performance.
|
You're right. For all I know next month they could half in price and double in capacity. I'll put that one off for 6 months.
Another question I have is, since I haven't built a computer in three years, everything seems to advocate 4 cores, including tom's hardware. Do games even use more than two yet? I know how hard it is to make use of multiple threads in complex applications like games. I find it hard to believe that these games that are coming out, in particular sc2, are making very good use of more than two.
I've seen some games that adjust the AI to use more resources if it can in the background, but that doesn't apply to SC2, because the computer AI has to be deterministic for multiplayer and replays involving bots, so it has to make the same choices no matter what computer it is run on. Considering it is a custom engine one started years ago, I have a hard time believing it is tuned with this type of CPU in mind.
Is it no longer true that you can get better overall performance for cpu intensive applications like games out of fewer cores?
|
On October 25 2009 04:05 decemberscalm wrote:Show nested quote +On October 24 2009 10:13 ghermination wrote:On October 24 2009 09:54 Drowsy wrote: What are the advantages of having a dx11 card? What features and stuff does dx11 provide? Hardware tesselation support and megatexturing. And what are those in non-technical terms?
Tesselation is a process in which a surface (for example, a facial texture) is broken up into more and more surfaces, which makes it easier to add more detail. If you model a face with only 4 triangles, obviously it isn't going to look too great. However when you increase those surfaces exponentially, via a tesselation algorithm to 16 surfaces, the detail will be much better. Only another step up via tesselation, and you're nearing photorealism. All cards since the nvidia 6 series and the x850 (i believe) have had the support for tesselation, however DirectX has never supported it at the driver level, now it does. The 5xxx series radeon cards and gt300 both have boosted tesselation processors to add support for it.
Megatexturing is a pretty straightforward idea. Instead of tiling the same texture over and over a single texture the size of the entire 3d area is loaded into the framebuffer. This allows for vastly more detail, although it does increase the amount of vRAM necessary to render things properly (although at 1680x1050 you will still only need a 512mb card in even the most strenuous situations. 1920x1200 and above is when you really start to need that extra RAM)
|
|
|
|