• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 03:09
CEST 09:09
KST 16:09
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Classic Games #3: Rogue vs Serral at BlizzCon0[ASL20] Ro16 Preview Pt1: Ascent9Maestros of the Game: Week 1/Play-in Preview12[ASL20] Ro24 Preview Pt2: Take-Off7[ASL20] Ro24 Preview Pt1: Runway13
Community News
Weekly Cups (Sept 1-7): MaxPax rebounds & Clem saga continues22LiuLi Cup - September 2025 Tournaments2Weekly Cups (August 25-31): Clem's Last Straw?39Weekly Cups (Aug 18-24): herO dethrones MaxPax6Maestros of The Game—$20k event w/ live finals in Paris76
StarCraft 2
General
#1: Maru - Greatest Players of All Time Weekly Cups (Sept 1-7): MaxPax rebounds & Clem saga continues Classic Games #3: Rogue vs Serral at BlizzCon What happened to Singapore/Brazil servers? Team Liquid Map Contest #21 - Presented by Monster Energy
Tourneys
Maestros of The Game—$20k event w/ live finals in Paris WardiTV Mondays Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series Chzzk MurlocKing SC1 vs SC2 Cup
Strategy
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 490 Masters of Midnight Mutation # 489 Bannable Offense Mutation # 488 What Goes Around Mutation # 487 Think Fast
Brood War
General
Recommended FPV games (post-KeSPA) The Korean Terminology Thread [ASL20] Ro16 Preview Pt1: Ascent FlaSh on ACS Winners being in ASL ASL20 General Discussion
Tourneys
[ASL20] Ro16 Group B [ASL20] Ro16 Group A Is there English video for group selection for ASL BWCL Season 63 Announcement
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Muta micro map competition Fighting Spirit mining rates [G] Mineral Boosting
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread General RTS Discussion Thread Warcraft III: The Frozen Throne Path of Exile
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The Games Industry And ATVI UK Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
The Happy Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023 TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread High temperatures on bridge(s)
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Collective Intelligence: Tea…
TrAiDoS
A very expensive lesson on ma…
Garnet
hello world
radishsoup
Lemme tell you a thing o…
JoinTheRain
RTS Design in Hypercoven
a11
Evil Gacha Games and the…
ffswowsucks
INDEPENDIENTE LA CTM
XenOsky
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1143 users

What wrecked SC2? - Page 34

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 32 33 34 35 36 Next All
Ravomat
Profile Joined September 2010
Germany422 Posts
August 10 2017 16:14 GMT
#661
On August 10 2017 20:58 Clbull wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 10 2017 14:10 ReachTheSky wrote:
One more thing that created a divide in the community.

Invitationals.

So many players kept getting free rides into tournaments based early performances. Had there been open enrollment into all the tournaments, the community would have felt included and apart of something. In addition, you would have seen many more up and coming players/new blood. Everyone would have had to earn their keep. no free rides. Instead this allowed a small group of individuals to always be labeled as pro gamers and protect their status while minimizing opportunities for new comers.


There are very few players that I felt were undeserving of these free rides. Making everything an open tournament also brings in the flaw of not being able to build up storylines around popular players in case they either underperform or are outclassed by new talent.


I despise your attitude. To you, directed stories are more important than good games and good players. A scene with open tournaments is self-regulating and creates stories on its own. Bad players have to go and new, better ones replace them and maybe those bad players get better and make a comeback later. Your own arguments contradict you. Giving out so many invitations also robs newcomers of their chance to play established players which just hurts overall.
ReachTheSky
Profile Joined April 2010
United States3294 Posts
August 10 2017 16:28 GMT
#662
On August 11 2017 01:14 Ravomat wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 10 2017 20:58 Clbull wrote:
On August 10 2017 14:10 ReachTheSky wrote:
One more thing that created a divide in the community.

Invitationals.

So many players kept getting free rides into tournaments based early performances. Had there been open enrollment into all the tournaments, the community would have felt included and apart of something. In addition, you would have seen many more up and coming players/new blood. Everyone would have had to earn their keep. no free rides. Instead this allowed a small group of individuals to always be labeled as pro gamers and protect their status while minimizing opportunities for new comers.


There are very few players that I felt were undeserving of these free rides. Making everything an open tournament also brings in the flaw of not being able to build up storylines around popular players in case they either underperform or are outclassed by new talent.


I despise your attitude. To you, directed stories are more important than good games and good players. A scene with open tournaments is self-regulating and creates stories on its own. Bad players have to go and new, better ones replace them and maybe those bad players get better and make a comeback later. Your own arguments contradict you. Giving out so many invitations also robs newcomers of their chance to play established players which just hurts overall.


I wish there was a like button for this post. You get an upvote good sir.
TL+ Member
KungKras
Profile Joined August 2008
Sweden484 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-08-10 17:17:00
August 10 2017 17:16 GMT
#663
On August 10 2017 14:05 ReachTheSky wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 10 2017 08:42 KungKras wrote:
I just spent a lot of time reading old threads about SC2.

I reminded me of the optimism and the "It's a new game, it'll get figured out and we'll see awesome micro and plays" kind of mindset that was around in the beta and right after launch. I was one of those optimists back then.

Here are some interesting threads I found:
www.teamliquid.net
www.teamliquid.net
www.teamliquid.net
www.teamliquid.net

www.teamliquid.net This was during the beta and the guy still hit the nail on the head. Goes to show that some people (not me) did see the fundamental mechanical problems of SC2.

www.teamliquid.net
www.teamliquid.net
www.teamliquid.net

www.teamliquid.net I think this thread disproves that there was an "old guard" with this all-permeating attitude of "Only macro games are acceptible or you are scum!!!!!". Seems like most people even back then were fine with even pure cheese strats because they make the game exciting.

www.teamliquid.net

www.teamliquid.net This one really breaks my heart knowing what the future actually became like.

www.teamliquid.net This was very close to launch.

www.teamliquid.net The honeymoon period was alive and well...

www.teamliquid.net Again coming from the future this makes me sad.

www.teamliquid.net

www.teamliquid.net

Going through the time capsule of this period was really interesting with both happy and sad moments.


The thread you linked with the survey about cheesing proves nothing. You can't even see who voted.

Every single thing i've said is legitimate feedback. Things that turned me and many others away from wanting to be apart of the sc2 community/playing the game.


I re-read one of your earlier posts and saw that by "old guard" you mean the brood war progamers and teams switching to SC2. I missed that detail and thought you meant the entire BW community before, my bad. I reacted because what I remember is that in the bigger (not just progamers) BW community, cheese was something that pissed off a minority but was accepted by most as brining excietement and strategic diversity to the game.

If you spoke with progamers back then I'll take your word for it. I mean it makes sense because cheese makes it about just micro and those people with really good macro skills might get annoyed when a player tries to bypass one of their skills. So it's not surprising from a psychological standpoint if the pros frowned upon it. (even though it's super exciting to see cheese every now and then as a viever and removing it would hurt the experience).
If they really did have an impact on the design of SC2 that's a shame and I guess the lesson to be learned is that it's important to listen to the viewers of the game as well as the pros.
"When life gives me lemons, I go look for oranges"
404AlphaSquad
Profile Joined October 2011
839 Posts
August 10 2017 17:35 GMT
#664
On August 11 2017 02:16 KungKras wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 10 2017 14:05 ReachTheSky wrote:
On August 10 2017 08:42 KungKras wrote:
I just spent a lot of time reading old threads about SC2.

I reminded me of the optimism and the "It's a new game, it'll get figured out and we'll see awesome micro and plays" kind of mindset that was around in the beta and right after launch. I was one of those optimists back then.

Here are some interesting threads I found:
www.teamliquid.net
www.teamliquid.net
www.teamliquid.net
www.teamliquid.net

www.teamliquid.net This was during the beta and the guy still hit the nail on the head. Goes to show that some people (not me) did see the fundamental mechanical problems of SC2.

www.teamliquid.net
www.teamliquid.net
www.teamliquid.net

www.teamliquid.net I think this thread disproves that there was an "old guard" with this all-permeating attitude of "Only macro games are acceptible or you are scum!!!!!". Seems like most people even back then were fine with even pure cheese strats because they make the game exciting.

www.teamliquid.net

www.teamliquid.net This one really breaks my heart knowing what the future actually became like.

www.teamliquid.net This was very close to launch.

www.teamliquid.net The honeymoon period was alive and well...

www.teamliquid.net Again coming from the future this makes me sad.

www.teamliquid.net

www.teamliquid.net

Going through the time capsule of this period was really interesting with both happy and sad moments.


The thread you linked with the survey about cheesing proves nothing. You can't even see who voted.

Every single thing i've said is legitimate feedback. Things that turned me and many others away from wanting to be apart of the sc2 community/playing the game.


I re-read one of your earlier posts and saw that by "old guard" you mean the brood war progamers and teams switching to SC2. I missed that detail and thought you meant the entire BW community before, my bad. I reacted because what I remember is that in the bigger (not just progamers) BW community, cheese was something that pissed off a minority but was accepted by most as brining excietement and strategic diversity to the game.

If you spoke with progamers back then I'll take your word for it. I mean it makes sense because cheese makes it about just micro and those people with really good macro skills might get annoyed when a player tries to bypass one of their skills. So it's not surprising from a psychological standpoint if the pros frowned upon it. (even though it's super exciting to see cheese every now and then as a viever and removing it would hurt the experience).
If they really did have an impact on the design of SC2 that's a shame and I guess the lesson to be learned is that it's important to listen to the viewers of the game as well as the pros.


The MothershipCore with the Nexus overcharge was literally designed for: "stopping terran cheeses" to quote DB.
aka Kalevi
lestye
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States4178 Posts
August 11 2017 00:53 GMT
#665
On August 10 2017 22:54 kajtarp wrote:
I think one main reason that wrecked sc2 is that it got fragmented into expansions. Dividing the single player campaign and the story is ok. Dividing the multiplayer was a total bullshit. Because they always had to cut out some units that hurted the races, the gameplay and the balance. And the whole game is a patch fest, because with every new expansion they just started a never ending patch spree. After a few years of patches where the game finally got into a more or less balanced state, a new expansion always came out literally resetting the whole process, and it had to be restarted again and again. Sometimes i imagine if we had lurkers, disruptors, adepts, cyclones, hellbats, vipers etc. from the very beginning in what shape this game could have been. I am 100% certain much better, than the current shape of the game.

That's probably a good point, and goes into the idea that SC2 just had an archaic business model. Especially when you have so many alternatives for competitive multiplayer games nowadays.

I dont think it was "that bad" because the expansions were 2 years apart, compared to WC3/BW where the expansion was just 1 year apart. But that's me.
"You guys are just edgelords. Embrace your inner weeb desu" -Zergneedsfood
opisska
Profile Blog Joined February 2011
Poland8852 Posts
August 11 2017 01:04 GMT
#666
SC2 is not fragmented into expansions, the "expansions" are just big paid patches, the amount of people that play an old version of the game is not significant.
"Jeez, that's far from ideal." - Serral, the king of mild trashtalk
TL+ Member
lestye
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States4178 Posts
August 11 2017 01:18 GMT
#667
On August 11 2017 10:04 opisska wrote:
SC2 is not fragmented into expansions, the "expansions" are just big paid patches, the amount of people that play an old version of the game is not significant.

No, but it could fragment the playerbase. "Oh I'm in the mood to play SC2....but I don't want to spend another 40 dollars for an expansion pack, I'll go playing something else instead".
"You guys are just edgelords. Embrace your inner weeb desu" -Zergneedsfood
Legionnaire
Profile Joined January 2003
Australia4514 Posts
August 11 2017 04:56 GMT
#668
I'm late to this party. But i think one of the biggest contributors is lack of high ground advantage. It was one of my complaints when SC2 was first released.

Without HGA.
- Creates deathballs.
- Players with the biggest army wins. Almost always. particularly with the way army damage stacks, (2 even armies will result in almost no survivors, but an army 10% larger will live with 50% of their army etc)
- You can not split your army into two, as the other player will keep his army together, kill 1 army and then go kill the other. (there are other exceptions, ie , retreating with one army etc etc)
- Creates a very linear gameplay towards making the biggest army. (death balls)
- Death balls results in a lot of 'nothing' happening, and then 1 sudden clash and the game ends. (particularly bad in War3, where is creep killing and then 1 fight and game is over. Not quite as bad in SC2, where more skirmishes occur.)

With HGA.
- A player can skip the largest army in exchange for a strategic decision.
- I can now give up my army advantage, to do drops. To tech in different ways. To turtle if i so desire. Knowing that i am safe on my ramp against an army larger than my own.
- Does not apply to just defensive play, but you can camp above their ramps, or in strategic locations on the map creating mild stale mates with armies that are mismatched.
- I can now do drops. Or tech changes, or turtle by taking island bases knowing that i can hold a ramp.
- Creates non-linear gameplay.
- Allows a losing player to do epic comebacks.

All of this allows for interesting gameplay options, and viewability.

There have been so many games, where i am dead. Dead. and i barely hold the high ground and do an epic comeback. Both fun/memorable to play. And fun to watch when it happens. In sc2. They just steam roll over the top.

--
A few other things;
- Unit stacking/movement, also adding to death balls.
- Graphics prettiness/unit stacking makes it harder for new 'viewers'/'spectators' understanding what is going on.
- Ladder System / Replays / more players, improved the skill much faster, making it harder for singular players becoming gods for long periods creating epic storylines /rivalries. (yes yes there still are some)

Now not all of these things are bad, a game without a decent match making system sucks and i would prefer it to have it rather than to go without. But there are pros and cons to everything.
My hope is one day stupid people will feel the same pain when they talk, as the pain the rest of us feel when we hear them. Twitter: @Legionnaire_au
saddaromma
Profile Joined April 2013
1129 Posts
August 11 2017 05:07 GMT
#669
^agree

alternative option - cut damage by 30% across all units (also healing effects) and slightly improve static defense options.
Jealous
Profile Blog Joined December 2011
10170 Posts
August 11 2017 07:17 GMT
#670
On August 11 2017 14:07 saddaromma wrote:
^agree

alternative option - cut damage by 30% across all units (also healing effects) and slightly improve static defense options.

Wouldn't that just make heavily armored units OP? It can't be that simple. Static defensive structures, units, and anilities are already too strong according to some.
"The right to vote is only the oar of the slaveship, I wanna be free." -- бум бум сучка!
kajtarp
Profile Joined April 2011
Hungary485 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-08-11 12:05:18
August 11 2017 12:03 GMT
#671
On August 11 2017 10:04 opisska wrote:
SC2 is not fragmented into expansions, the "expansions" are just big paid patches, the amount of people that play an old version of the game is not significant.



Yes it was/is fragmented. Because races were castrated from the very beginning. So by fragmented, i don't mainly mean the playerbase, i mean the gameplay and the races. Everyone knew in WoL for example that Zergs are not what Zergs meant to be in the end. Only in the 2nd expansion did Blizzard add lurkers for example. Imagine if Jaedong had Lurkers and strong LotV like hydras in HotS... Same goes with other terran or toss units. If we had all the "this is how the final state of the game meant to be" units from the very beginning, especially during the most competetive years i'm certain we have a lot better game now.

Instead we start with WoL in 2010 July with castrated races, game is balanced around the castrated races. They release Heart of the Swarm in 2013 March. They add some new units and abilities for each race, but its still not what the final game is meant to be. But again, new units, new abilities balance process has to be started again from scratch. It again takes a year or more, to get the balance more or less right, but it is still not what the final state of Sc2 was meant to be.

Then Legacy of the Void is released at 2015 November. Again some new units, some new abilities, balancing has to be restarted again. And usual, they dont get it right. Literally every race has units the other races complain against. One year later, they release a new big patch to fix the game. Even tough LotV is what the game was meant to be in the end, after a year they have to release a patch, a huge patch, that again redifines units and abilities and races, its almost so big change like a seperate expansion. That was called patch 3.8.0 if i remember correctly, and was released around 2016 november. So Wings of Liberty was released in July 2010, and up until 2016 november people played SC2 that is not considered the final state.

Imagine we had that patch 3.8.0 or something similar in end of 2011 or beginning of 2012 instead of end of 2016. What would have been the difference? The most competitive years would have been played with the "final" game. Where most players,teams,sponsors and viewers were around, and many of the BW pros. Now both the competitive and the non competitive playerbase is shrinked. Sponsors are almost gone, teams are disbanded, only a few remains. And after 7 years of Wol release, the balance is still not right. And many of the retired pros never got the chance to play the final game on a big stage.


Why so serious?
Jasper_Ty
Profile Joined July 2017
101 Posts
August 11 2017 12:37 GMT
#672
I also think the lackluster storylines deterred people from buying the next expansion. I for sure wasn't as hyped for the HotS campaign as much as I was for WoL, and I wasn't excited at all for LotV.
nighcol
Profile Joined January 2012
298 Posts
August 11 2017 13:24 GMT
#673
On August 11 2017 21:03 kajtarp wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 11 2017 10:04 opisska wrote:
SC2 is not fragmented into expansions, the "expansions" are just big paid patches, the amount of people that play an old version of the game is not significant.

Instead we start with WoL in 2010 July with castrated races, game is balanced around the castrated races. They release Heart of the Swarm in 2013 March. They add some new units and abilities for each race, but its still not what the final game is meant to be. But again, new units, new abilities balance process has to be started again from scratch. It again takes a year or more, to get the balance more or less right, but it is still not what the final state of Sc2 was meant to be.


I'm quite certain that they weren't "castrated". Blizzard didn't have some big vision about what the final versions of the races should be that they kept back and fed us little by little. Back when they were still considering even removing the carrier they thought they couldn't even just add stuff to what was already there but eventually decided it wouldn't be a problem. It just took them that long to iterate on the multiplayer... Of course if they could've had the freedom to make major changes and not wait until an expansion they might have done it faster.
ProMeTheus112
Profile Joined December 2009
France2027 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-08-11 13:49:42
August 11 2017 13:45 GMT
#674
because they didn't have a clear vision of what races play styles could be like when they made SC2, they were focusing on making cool individual units so that they could just add more "cool" individual units to justify expansion packs, dustin browder said it "we're not trying to do anything in terms of style for each race we're just trying to make sure that every single unit is really cool and have that potential for awe moments", in other words to deal terrible terrible damage in some situations
dustin browder also admited that when he came at blizzard, he had no understanding of the difference in quality between blizzard games and C&C that he worked on. It appears he never actually grasped how starcraft works and was simply unable as well as possibly unwilling to design a sequel that had a comparable potential. It simply wasn't even the goal of the project.
this is my honest perspective on the matter, DK only followed the logic that DB worked on and amplified it while erasing the stuff that got in the way, the other half of the marketing plan revolved around investment in esports and advertising / image building / capitalizing on the "starcraft" brand.
VelRa_G
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
Canada304 Posts
August 11 2017 23:14 GMT
#675
Remember when we wanted chat rooms and got Facebook integration? Remember how difficult Blizzard made life for PC Bangs? Remember how the competitive scene was a joke for the first 2 years, with GSL behind a paywall to boot?
Nuda Veritas
KungKras
Profile Joined August 2008
Sweden484 Posts
August 12 2017 00:30 GMT
#676
On August 12 2017 08:14 VelRa_G wrote:
Remember when we wanted chat rooms and got Facebook integration? Remember how difficult Blizzard made life for PC Bangs? Remember how the competitive scene was a joke for the first 2 years, with GSL behind a paywall to boot?


Or that infamous "Do people really want chat channels" interview.
"When life gives me lemons, I go look for oranges"
fish_radio
Profile Blog Joined March 2017
182 Posts
August 12 2017 04:35 GMT
#677
[image loading]

User was warned for this post
Sebyul Server W.I.P.
Heyjoray
Profile Joined September 2015
240 Posts
August 12 2017 04:43 GMT
#678
God damn i cant wait for reality to kick you guys in the face. Its gonna be great

User was warned for this post
Jealous
Profile Blog Joined December 2011
10170 Posts
August 12 2017 04:54 GMT
#679
On August 12 2017 13:43 Heyjoray wrote:
God damn i cant wait for reality to kick you guys in the face. Its gonna be great

Thanks buddy!
"The right to vote is only the oar of the slaveship, I wanna be free." -- бум бум сучка!
404AlphaSquad
Profile Joined October 2011
839 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-08-12 06:00:35
August 12 2017 05:44 GMT
#680
On August 12 2017 09:30 KungKras wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 12 2017 08:14 VelRa_G wrote:
Remember when we wanted chat rooms and got Facebook integration? Remember how difficult Blizzard made life for PC Bangs? Remember how the competitive scene was a joke for the first 2 years, with GSL behind a paywall to boot?


Or that infamous "Do people really want chat channels" interview.

Ah yes. I remember newcomers not understanding how great bnet 1 was and believing that blizzard had a "plan" regarding social features on bnet when in fact they were clueless. The entire sc2 community should thank the "old guard" because without them your battlenet 2 would still have no chat channels.
Remember when there were no chat channels?
Remember when you could only pm people?
Remember when you could only pm people when they are in your friendslist?
Remember when the only way to add a friend was via Email adress that is linked to your battle net account?
Remember when you had to use an outside bnet2 chat program to give that E-mail adress to somebody?
Remember when the only way to invite someone in a lobby was if they were in your friendslist?
Remember how every added "friend" was able to see your full name?
Remember when there was no Dnd mode when chat finally got implemented? (I guess every youtuber/streamer remembers)

Anyone arguing that Blizzard had a concrete "plan" when it comes to the social features of sc2/bnet2 or that they had a good reason to ditch the old system is delusional. The classic system is working better to this date.
aka Kalevi
Prev 1 32 33 34 35 36 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 4h 51m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
ProTech79
StarCraft: Brood War
Shuttle 1678
Killer 363
Pusan 156
PianO 94
Mong 94
sSak 88
Leta 71
Nal_rA 56
ToSsGirL 41
Noble 28
[ Show more ]
Sharp 17
Bale 16
HiyA 7
yabsab 7
Hm[arnc] 7
Barracks 0
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K932
shoxiejesuss10
Other Games
summit1g6986
tarik_tv6156
WinterStarcraft575
C9.Mang0423
Tasteless144
Mew2King70
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick898
StarCraft: Brood War
UltimateBattle 42
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Sammyuel 48
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• WagamamaTV207
League of Legends
• Rush2240
• Stunt637
• HappyZerGling100
Upcoming Events
Kung Fu Cup
4h 51m
ByuN vs HeRoMaRinE
MaxPax vs Creator
TBD vs Classic
OSC
8h 51m
Moja vs Babymarine
Solar vs TBD
sOs vs goblin
Nice vs INexorable
sebesdes vs Iba
Nicoract vs TBD
NightMare vs TBD
OSC
16h 51m
ReBellioN vs PAPI
Spirit vs TBD
Percival vs TBD
TriGGeR vs TBD
Shameless vs UedSoldier
Cham vs TBD
Harstem vs TBD
RSL Revival
1d 2h
Cure vs SHIN
Reynor vs Zoun
Kung Fu Cup
1d 4h
The PondCast
1d 5h
RSL Revival
2 days
Classic vs TriGGeR
ByuN vs Maru
Online Event
2 days
Kung Fu Cup
2 days
BSL Team Wars
2 days
Team Bonyth vs Team Dewalt
[ Show More ]
BSL Team Wars
2 days
RSL Revival
3 days
Maestros of the Game
3 days
ShoWTimE vs Classic
Clem vs herO
Serral vs Bunny
Reynor vs Zoun
Cosmonarchy
3 days
Bonyth vs Dewalt
[BSL 2025] Weekly
3 days
RSL Revival
4 days
Maestros of the Game
4 days
BSL Team Wars
4 days
Afreeca Starleague
5 days
Snow vs Sharp
Jaedong vs Mini
Sparkling Tuna Cup
6 days
Afreeca Starleague
6 days
Light vs Speed
Larva vs Soma
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Copa Latinoamericana 4
SEL Season 2 Championship
HCC Europe

Ongoing

BSL 20 Team Wars
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 3
BSL 21 Points
ASL Season 20
CSL 2025 AUTUMN (S18)
LASL Season 20
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
Chzzk MurlocKing SC1 vs SC2 Cup #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1

Upcoming

2025 Chongqing Offline CUP
BSL Polish World Championship 2025
BSL Season 21
BSL 21 Team A
EC S1
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters Fall
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.