EPTI have a hunch the Niners avoided ILBs because they're flipping him into the middle but good fucking lord man.
NFL 2015 Season - Page 37
| Forum Index > Closed |
|
QuanticHawk
United States32130 Posts
I have a hunch the Niners avoided ILBs because they're flipping him into the middle but good fucking lord man. | ||
|
whatisthisasheep
624 Posts
http://philadelphia.suntimes.com/philadelphia-eagles/7/96/124641/report-rumbles-eagles-coach-chip-kelly-heading-titans | ||
|
Ghostcom
Denmark4783 Posts
On May 07 2015 03:19 Souma wrote: http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000491385/article/wells-report-released-on-footballs-used-in-afc-title Perhaps Brady should have studied the rule book himself  | ||
|
Jaaaaasper
United States10225 Posts
| ||
|
xDaunt
United States17988 Posts
On May 07 2015 05:04 whatisthisasheep wrote: Chip Kelley might be heading to the Titans. Would be nice deal to ruin one team then leave for another. http://philadelphia.suntimes.com/philadelphia-eagles/7/96/124641/report-rumbles-eagles-coach-chip-kelly-heading-titans Haha, this is as bizarre as the Harbaugh rumors from last year. Hopefully it comes true just for shits and giggles. | ||
|
Ghostcom
Denmark4783 Posts
On May 07 2015 05:24 Jaaaaasper wrote: I'm impressed how the Wells report completely failed to mention the ref who was stealing the balls that would have been the actual evidence one way or another. Because it was irrelevant to the actual deflating of balls? The Wells report does explain the removal of balls for charity auction (which was the balls that the league official stole) as well as the circumstances relevant for the deflation of the game balls. EDIT: I kinda doubt there will be any (severe) punishment though. | ||
Shellshock
United States97276 Posts
On May 07 2015 05:04 whatisthisasheep wrote: Chip Kelley might be heading to the Titans. Would be nice deal to ruin one team then leave for another. http://philadelphia.suntimes.com/philadelphia-eagles/7/96/124641/report-rumbles-eagles-coach-chip-kelly-heading-titans Titans confirmed allegedly possibly maybe racist but more probable that they aren't than they are | ||
|
DannyJ
United States5110 Posts
| ||
Teoita
Italy12246 Posts
| ||
|
GoShox
United States1843 Posts
On May 07 2015 05:35 Ghostcom wrote: EDIT: I kinda doubt there will be any (severe) punishment though. It's the Patriots, of course there won't be. Goodell isn't gonna punish his good buddy. | ||
|
Kevin_Sorbo
Canada3217 Posts
they wont strip them of 2016 pick(s) imo. maybe a slap on the wrist... | ||
|
Shellshock
United States97276 Posts
edit oh wait they cant contact him til the 9th. my bad | ||
|
Jaaaaasper
United States10225 Posts
On May 07 2015 06:53 GoShox wrote: It's the Patriots, of course there won't be. Goodell isn't gonna punish his good buddy. You do realize the patriots were more heavily penalized for taping from the wrong sport than the bronocos were for cheating the salary cap or the saints were for deliberately trying to injure other players right? Just because they keep beating your favorite team doesn't change the facts, just your biases. | ||
|
GoShox
United States1843 Posts
On May 07 2015 07:48 Jaaaaasper wrote: You do realize the patriots were more heavily penalized for taping from the wrong sport than the bronocos were for cheating the salary cap or the saints were for deliberately trying to injure other players right? Just because they keep beating your favorite team doesn't change the facts, just your biases. My favorite team has actually done pretty well against the Patriots, and I've generally been a Tom Brady fan. But I'm not a fan of him lying about the deflated balls and saying "I've heard everything now" in response to the allegations. The guy has been caught lying and, if Goodell really cares about the integrity of the game as he says, then severe punishments should be coming, like a big suspension for Brady and a huge punishment to the Patriots as a whole. Remember, ignorance is not an excuse. But, I'll be very surprised if these punishments ever come. Oh, and I know all too well about the Broncos cheating their asses off to win two Super Bowls. Didn't really care for a reminder, but thanks anyways I guess. | ||
|
cLutZ
United States19574 Posts
| ||
|
zev318
Canada4306 Posts
| ||
|
cLutZ
United States19574 Posts
On May 07 2015 09:54 zev318 wrote: i dunno how harsh of a penalty you could impose from "more likely than not", i mean the guy didnt write "definitely". Well, in civil courts, you would implement 100% of the available penalty. Like, if you said it was more likely than not that a guy caused $100,000 in property damage, he would pay $100,000. In criminal courts it would result in 0% of the penalty, you don't get 2 years for "probably" assaulting someone when the statute has a 5 year sentence. So really, if it was a sane system, the answer would inform us on what Goodell was doing. But it probably will be a made up answer. | ||
|
Jaaaaasper
United States10225 Posts
| ||
|
Craze
United States561 Posts
On May 07 2015 10:25 Jaaaaasper wrote: Lol the scientific report from the wells report is from the same company that put out a study saying cigarette smoking doesn't cause cancer. Are you sure the paper didn't say, "It is possible that cigarettes probably definitely don't have a connection to cancer"? | ||
|
red_
United States8474 Posts
On May 07 2015 07:48 Jaaaaasper wrote: You do realize the patriots were more heavily penalized for taping from the wrong sport than the bronocos were for cheating the salary cap or the saints were for deliberately trying to injure other players right? Just because they keep beating your favorite team doesn't change the facts, just your biases. Two second round picks and losing your head coach for a season isn't a harsher penalty than one first round pick and fines? | ||
| ||
