EPTI agree he's the best option. I'm just concerned about his health
NFL 2015 Season - Page 2
| Forum Index > Closed |
Shellshock
United States97276 Posts
I agree he's the best option. I'm just concerned about his health | ||
|
TwoToneTerran
United States8841 Posts
Ah, who am I kidding. | ||
|
AgentW
United States7725 Posts
On February 13 2015 07:26 Shellshock wrote: I agree he's the best option. I'm just concerned about his health I agree and think he's made of glass, but there's a chance he strings together a decent 16 games, and I think that would certainly be better than what they're going to get. | ||
|
Sermokala
United States13822 Posts
Will AP be traded? will he come back after a year of rest better then ever? | ||
|
QuanticHawk
United States32044 Posts
On February 13 2015 03:57 Teoita wrote: It would probably be an upgrade over anything the Browns have atm. I still think Manziel is way way worse than Hoyer though yeah right now at least since he can't hit the broadside of a barn but hoyer's trash that costs that team games. I think the Browns would be dumb to blow another high pick on a qb. give manziel at least another year or two before giving up. | ||
Teoita
Italy12246 Posts
| ||
|
QuanticHawk
United States32044 Posts
I just think that Hoyer sucks so much that he will actively cost the browns games and you might as well just start manziel to get him experience if you're going to piss away the season with Hoyer there. | ||
|
Teoita
Italy12246 Posts
| ||
|
QuanticHawk
United States32044 Posts
Bradford I could see at least having a Alex Smith career trajectory. At the very least, he will not cost you games that Hoyer will with bad throws and interceptions. | ||
|
Ghostcom
Denmark4782 Posts
| ||
Darkhorse
United States23455 Posts
On February 13 2015 03:43 giftdgecko wrote: McCourty is an easy franchise tag, he's not going anywhere. Revis it all depends on how much he likes winning vs how much he likes money (the Jets are willing to pay him). He used to want to be paid like a QB, Pat's will never go that high. Would you want Revis if it means cutting Wilfork? It's a tough call between the two. Honestly I think Wilfork is more vital to the defense (Pats generally struggle against the run) but his play has gone down a notch. We'll see how it plays out | ||
|
Gryffindor_us
United States5606 Posts
| ||
|
Chewbacca.
United States3634 Posts
On February 15 2015 02:57 Gryffindor_us wrote: I love Wilfork, but I'd cut him at $8 million. A lot of times it was Collins and Hightower who were making the tackles anyway. It's hard to say that. I'd take Revis over Wilfork though. I have to agree with this, Wilfork doesn't seem as vital as he used to. Age and his injury are probably catching up to him | ||
|
andrewlt
United States7702 Posts
| ||
|
Rogomatic
United States0 Posts
If any FAs are to be let go, the most likely candidates are Ridley and Vereen. Perhaps even Connolly. | ||
|
Souma
2nd Worst City in CA8938 Posts
| ||
|
Shellshock
United States97276 Posts
| ||
|
Shotcoder
United States2316 Posts
On February 15 2015 09:04 Shellshock wrote: Browns should try to get Cutler I honestly think that, but all of my Browns friends here in Cleveland laughed at me. | ||
|
Shellshock
United States97276 Posts
On February 15 2015 09:15 Shotcoder wrote: I honestly think that, but all of my Browns friends here in Cleveland laughed at me. If it was possible I would take Cutler over any of their QBs | ||
|
AgentW
United States7725 Posts
On February 15 2015 09:17 Shellshock wrote: If it was possible I would take Cutler over any of their QBs In terms of play, of course, but that contract is a torpedo to the franchise. Some were speculating that the Bills would try to enter the Cutler sweepstakes, and I think that would be a horrible idea. For once, not having a first rounder in the 2015 draft might play to our advantage. | ||
| ||
