EPTGoliaths Imba? - Page 2
| Forum Index > Closed |
|
nS-g.OoZi
Canada92 Posts
| ||
|
Alborz
Canada1551 Posts
| ||
|
rel
Guam3521 Posts
| ||
Plexa
Aotearoa39261 Posts
On September 30 2006 23:43 Drowsy wrote: Maps that people play on;[removed quote within quote] No, pvt is statistically imbalanced in favor of protoss(at least on old pgt stats it was, particularly on maps that people actually play, on lt and a few older maps terran had a slight lead). Removing gollie range would make an already 1-2% imbalance even worse to equally as bad as pvz or possibly even worse, which makes this an absolutely retarded suggestion. It'd be like saying "OH BTW ZEALOT SPEED IMPROVEMENT MAKES ZEALS WAY TO GOOD PVZ THEY NEED NERF!" Luna -> slightly easier for protoss RH3 -> Balanced? Rponit -> Slightly easier for terran imo Forte -> Protoss etc its all map dependant at a HIGH level the mu is balanced okay? | ||
|
DarK]N[exuS
China1441 Posts
| ||
|
Yuljan
2196 Posts
| ||
|
8882
2718 Posts
pvt is imbalanced what next? pvp is imbalanced too? | ||
|
lawl mart
United States1289 Posts
| ||
|
mcmascote
Brazil1575 Posts
On October 02 2006 02:05 lawl mart wrote: well protoss always win pvp ya? OK, HE HAS A POINT! 1.15 comming soon. | ||
|
sdpgposd
United Kingdom1464 Posts
Theres no way the terran can properly defend from carriers without the goliath range. It would also mess up a lot of balance in the game in other mus. | ||
|
Patriot.dlk
Sweden5462 Posts
On October 02 2006 02:59 sdpgposd wrote: Are you serious? Theres no way the terran can properly defend from carriers without the goliath range. It would also mess up a lot of balance in the game in other mus. by other mu:s you mean TvZ? Then no it would not be a issue. And if you was thinking about TvT then well yes goliaths would be not as used in TvT any longer. Got nothing to do with balance in the matchup | ||
|
Patriot.dlk
Sweden5462 Posts
| ||
|
sdpgposd
United Kingdom1464 Posts
| ||
|
Purind
Canada3562 Posts
| ||
|
pyrogenetix
United Arab Emirates5090 Posts
On October 02 2006 04:46 Purind wrote: This thread was serious? it was? | ||
|
strik.fr
France212 Posts
| ||
|
pooper-scooper
United States3108 Posts
| ||
|
IdrA
United States11541 Posts
On October 02 2006 05:43 strik.fr wrote: if your p is as predictible as the shit u do every day then don't cry for imbalance.You have to be a bit creative and not always open on macro based builds. not true you can play straight macro pvt and be just fine at top non kor/pgt A+ level. | ||
|
tKd_
United States2916 Posts
 | ||
|
LastWish
2013 Posts
Terran doesn't have any other sufficient counter, because wraiths die to sairs/goons and storm except for lockdown, which is even more gas-intensive and requires double attention compared to goliaths. Carriers on their own aren't suppose to be indistuctable, but combined with goons/storm/statis/(web) they nearly are. U see carriers are there to even protoss supply disadvantage, since protoss 200/200(considering purely ground force) doesn't mean that much as terran 200/200 or zerg 200/200. While 200/200 of Carriers/arbiters some storm, sair... is much harder to beat with any other 200/200. | ||
| ||
