EPTSo are there any differences between ranked mm and simple mm in the quality of the games?
How close to ixdl is the quality in high ranked games?
If you abandon in draft is it counted as lose in calibration games?
Ranked matchmaking coming to Dota 2 - Page 47
| Forum Index > Closed |
Please keep the QQ to a minimum if you do not like this update. We are happy to hear your reasoning for not liking a ranked system, but no "OMG VOLVO WHY" posts. | ||
|
phantomlancer23
733 Posts
So are there any differences between ranked mm and simple mm in the quality of the games? How close to ixdl is the quality in high ranked games? If you abandon in draft is it counted as lose in calibration games? | ||
|
dismiss
United Kingdom3341 Posts
| ||
|
SKC
Brazil18828 Posts
| ||
|
Ayaz2810
United States2763 Posts
On December 20 2013 10:31 SKC wrote: Noone is stuck in shitty games. You should consider playing -AP if all you accept playing is a single hero. I played my first game of CM, and it was horrible. Dude picked Medusa, Wraith King, Phantom Assassin, Sven, and Invoker for us to play. Not playing that shit again unless I'm stacking. | ||
|
Laserist
Turkey4269 Posts
For last 20 games in dotabuff, I manage to win only 5 of them. I envy guys having fun games... | ||
|
DrPandaPhD
5188 Posts
| ||
|
Soulstice
United States288 Posts
On December 20 2013 10:49 Laserist wrote: Something has broken after ranked games introduced. 11 wins and 25 losses over 36 games. Fucking %30 wr. Ranked & unranked mixed. Needless to say, all games including rare wins are stomps. Majority of them are solo queue. For last 20 games in dotabuff, I manage to win only 5 of them. I envy guys having fun games... Pretty much the same for me. I keep queueing thinking "it cant just keep happening"... but then it does. | ||
|
ArchmageKruzer
64 Posts
 ty volvo. whatever mmr boost you gave me, I thank you. Also, on my calibration games, I'm 4:4 | ||
|
harodihg
Japan1344 Posts
Change attitude! | ||
|
Retvets
1781 Posts
| ||
|
Darpa
Canada4413 Posts
| ||
|
BallinWitStalin
1177 Posts
MMR works fine. I'm not fucking expecting to be matched against Puppey or something. I feel very confident that match-making is putting me where I need to be. You guys need to understand that any change in skill probably happens gradually. With the amount of variance in between the quality of matches due to the natural limitations of an automated matchmaking system in a game like dota, any improvement in MMR will probably take quite a bit of time to occur. Just focus on how you can better your own game in the long run, and shit will get better. Trust that the fucking wizards at Valve know what they're doing when it comes to designing an MMR system. Unless you think you can code and design the crazy algorithms to deal with the complexities of the problem in this type of system, don't trust your tiny-ass sample size to draw conclusions about how "Volvo doesn't know what they're doing" when it comes to MMR. Trust me, they're paying some smart fucking people to figure that shit out, way smarter than me anyways. Honestly, as long as your teammates aren't trolling you should be able to have fun. Stop playing to "win" and play to improve your own skills, like good warding, ganking, last hitting, map sense, etc. That video posted above is pretty much perfect, and sums up my feelings on match-making systems in general. Edit: also, I find the tag for the poster above me very ironic, in the sentiments it expresses when compared to those expressed in the post. | ||
Excalibur_Z
United States12248 Posts
On December 20 2013 14:13 Darpa wrote: Seems kinda strange, only get marginally more points for a win than a loss.... Which means if valve is enforcing a 50% win ratio across the board, most people will never increase in MMR regardless of their skill increase. They will always face harder opponents until they lose to put them back even. There is no such thing as enforcing a 50% win ratio in this system or any system. | ||
TheEmulator
28100 Posts
On December 20 2013 14:51 Excalibur_Z wrote: There is no such thing as enforcing a 50% win ratio in this system or any system. Well they said specifically their system doesn't enforce a 50-50 ratio, but they have recently explained as to why it can do this on it's own. | ||
|
synapse
China13814 Posts
On December 20 2013 14:13 Darpa wrote: Seems kinda strange, only get marginally more points for a win than a loss.... Which means if valve is enforcing a 50% win ratio across the board, most people will never increase in MMR regardless of their skill increase. They will always face harder opponents until they lose to put them back even. Well the point is if you're at where you should be (skill-wise) then the system should have you stay there. If you're better than your current mmr, then you'll win more than you lose. | ||
|
Eriksen
Micronesia720 Posts
| ||
|
AndyJay
Australia833 Posts
| ||
|
xrayEU
Sweden571 Posts
I really enjoy ranked now, it's more serious than before ranked so maybe i can climb a few rating now. | ||
|
sandyph
Indonesia1640 Posts
The next 4 games are one sided stomped and lasted only around 30 minutes. I guess that first game dropped my MMR way below my normal score and people counter pick like hell, choose Riki and then instantly Gondar AND Slardar on the other side ... still won though since they have Gondar AND Slardar on their team ... | ||
|
Yarbleck
France233 Posts
Since starting ranked I am 12 -5 and 4 of the losses are the first 4 games of me getting back into it after playing way to much hearthstone + somewhat questionable teammates. Really love ranked it makes me want to play more dota again :3 | ||
| ||
