|
|
On May 03 2014 08:46 zeo wrote:Show nested quote +On May 03 2014 08:36 semantics wrote: It's a bit closer to 19th century american expansion. Send but loads of your people into another country, have them demand independence, annex that new state into your county. Easiest parallel to this is Texas from Mexico. Most of the people murdered tonight were citizens of Odessa and all of them had Ukranian passports. No one takes you seriously anymore btw... And did you really have to double post? I know you are trying to be annoying and all but... really?
|
zeo is upset by the 38 (?) people burned alive in odessa, as he should be, seeing some reports that several people were shot as well. enough with the sad circlejerk.
|
On May 03 2014 08:48 Rowrin wrote:Show nested quote +On May 03 2014 08:46 zeo wrote:On May 03 2014 08:36 semantics wrote: It's a bit closer to 19th century american expansion. Send but loads of your people into another country, have them demand independence, annex that new state into your county. Easiest parallel to this is Texas from Mexico. Most of the people murdered tonight were citizens of Odessa and all of them had Ukranian passports. No one takes you seriously anymore btw... And did you really have to double post? I know you are trying to be annoying and all but... really? I don't really expect people that try to justify the murder of 40 unarmed civilians by their own people to read whatever I say. Whatever side they are on, I will always happily be on the opposite one.
|
On May 03 2014 08:44 zeo wrote:Show nested quote +On May 03 2014 08:35 m4ini wrote:On May 03 2014 08:32 zeo wrote:On May 03 2014 08:28 m4ini wrote:On May 03 2014 08:21 zeo wrote:On May 03 2014 08:10 m4ini wrote:On May 03 2014 08:05 zeo wrote:On May 03 2014 07:58 Roman666 wrote:On May 03 2014 07:53 zeo wrote:On May 03 2014 07:48 Roman666 wrote: [quote] Corrupt crooks, and they have been running the country since 1991. You don't say? And the glorious euromaiden revolution that has the people from 2003 back in power will change something? It already did if you haven't noticed. It may be inconvienient for you and other Vlad claquers, but it did. You see, it is not about these guys which are in the interrim govt right now, but rather about the general society. You have a very good example in this very thread, how thinking in Ukraine has changed since then. Forty people getting trapped in a building and then deliberately set on fire really shows how Ukrainian society has improved since euromaidan While i was looking for your cocksucking argument, i found something interesting. Let me quote you. If you got into a protest knowing full well there are armed nazi's, hooligans and paramilitaries around you don't be surprised when you get shot, I am sorry you got shot, maybe you are a good person but you were brainwashed into thinking going to a protest with armed people around you ready to shoot at police was a good idea
Isn't that cute? What about, if you know there's armed nazis, hooligans, paramilitaries and army around, don't be surprised if you die? Not that i would agree, that statement is as retarded as it gets, but it sure shows what kind of guy you are, and how much your arguments are worth. Indeed the people going to these protest know full well what danger they are in, even more danger than the people at euromaiden by quite a considerable margin. 40 people were set on fire because they had an idea. What is so hard for you to understand that those people did not deserve to be set on fire? Oh don't get me wrong, i fully support the notion "they didn't deserve to be set on fire", or to die in general. But you can't have "well those euromaidan supporters, they had it coming, since they knew what was going on", and now this. Most people here think that for both parties. EuroMaidan is an idea as well, it wasn't only nazithugs, as much as you wish for that. And no. They chose to up the antees(anties?) by burrowing, finding and whatnot all the AK107s, AK47s, and other heavy arms. EuroMaidan escalated, this new mess was escalated the moment it started. So the 40 dead people 'had it coming' because in some other part of the country a minority went full Che Guevara? Well, by your definition which i quoted earlier.. Don't they? Nope, I have no idea where you got your twisted definition of my words from. Did the police in Kiev round up unarmed protesters and set them on fire? Did the murdered civilians in Odessa fire at police? I'm sure my reaction would have been different. Even thinking about playing down 40 people being murdered in a horrible way is disgusting. You are grasping at straws with a quote taken out of context.
Oh, i'm sure it's totally twisted to think, if someone says "well they're going to protest and they know there's violence, if they get shot it's their fault" he actually means that always. But in the wonderous world of zeo, seemingly not. If antimaidan protesters go out and protest, even though they know it's violent, well.. It's different. You can't tell how, most likely because you know it doesn't work like that.
Oh, and no, the quote, funny enough, wasn't taken out of context. Feel free to check the context, before you state something like that to try to discredit it.
Oh, but just for fun, let's answer your questions.
Police in kiev didn't need to round up, euromaidan kinda says it. Not to mention, yes, they surpressed protesters with gunfire, as we had video-proof of. They didn't set them on fire, but i don't see the difference between police killing civilians, and hooligans killing civilians. And no, your reaction would not be different. That's for sure. You still blame me to downplay those deaths, even though i just quoted you saying "sorry that you got shot, but that how it goes if you protest n stuff", that's how ridiculous you are. I said more than once, deaths are not acceptable. On both sides. You on the other hand are asshole enough to make up a difference between pro-russian protesters and EuroMaidan protesters.
zeo is upset by the 38 (?) people burned alive in odessa, as he should be, seeing some reports that several people were shot as well. enough with the sad circlejerk.
That's bullshit and you know it. People flak him for being upset now, but negligent when it happened to the side he didn't like. You won't find any person here who seriously thinks that what happened is okay. Don't play dumb. Also, source please for the shootings, because that's actually something that didn't come up so far in the medias i read.
edit: not to mention, hysterically making up facts like englishspeaking media not reporting on it, just as a sidenote
edit2: since i have a feeling that you still don't get what i'm on about - other than you, i don't see a difference between these deaths now, and the ones on "the other side". There's no justification for either side, both are equally tragic. As much as you want this to be so much worse, it is not.
|
|
@m4ini what's bullshit? zeo wouldn't have 2k posts if he was a troll.
|
On May 03 2014 09:40 nunez wrote: @m4ini what's bullshit? zeo wouldn't have 2k posts if he was a troll.
You have 3000, doesn't proove anything.
Jokes aside, i never said he's trolling. Not even remotely. So i'm not entirely sure what i'm supposed to answer here.
edit: actually not true, i'm certain i said a couple of times he's trolling, but not in this regard - and not in the recent past.
|
@m4ini you said i was bullshitting, what was bullshit exactly? i think the suggestion of zeo trolling or being a paid shill is ludicrous. the killings in odessa are upsetting.
|
On May 03 2014 09:47 nunez wrote: @m4ini you said i was bullshitting, what was bullshit exactly? i think the suggestion of zeo trolling or being a paid shill is ludicrous. the killings in odessa are upsetting.
Sigh, come back if you have substance please, what gripe others have with zeo, i neither know nor care about. I didn't say he's trolling, i didn't say he's paid, no idea why you try to connect that with me, and from here on out i'll stop answering to bs like that. I actually pretty clearly stated what i think he is, a hipocritical, opportunistic and proletic "something". That's what i think he is. Not paid. Not trolling. I do certainly think he actually believes what he's saying, no matter how ridiculous, ruling a troll out.
Oh and yes. They are upsetting. So are all deaths of people who stand up for their believes. That's the entire point. The moment you try to justify or relativate the deaths of one side, you're a big asshole.
|
@m4ini take some time to re-read my posts, i don't think you read them correctly. they were not directed at you personally. plenty of examples on this page and previous.
|
Actually you might be right. If that's the case, i apologize.
It was mainly because i said "you were bullshitting", in regards to "he's just upset". Being upset is fine, and how it should be, i agree with you there - but if you're only "upset" if a certain part of the ukrainians die, you're not upset. You're opportunistic. And that makes you a dick, and that's what people here give him flak for. Mainly. And i certainly agree with that assessment. After that you directed your quotes at me, i confused that, so mea culpa and sorry.
edit: still, source on gunshotwounds?
|
@m4ini no harm, no foul.
pictures coming out with people in protests with guns and comments on reddit and twitter so far... prolly have to wait until dust settles for more info.
|
On May 03 2014 10:24 nunez wrote: @m4ini no harm, no foul.
pictures coming out with people in protests with guns and comments on reddit and twitter so far... prolly have to wait until dust settles for more info.
Hm, well, lets see. I have no doubts that arms are involved on both sides though, nobody should be surprised.
|
you can see a guy shooting towards the burning building here ~ @6:25 mins f.ex: youtube, and gunfire can be heard in background of other vids. antimaidans shooting here ~ @0:20 youtube. retuers reporting over 40 casualties now.
|
inteview with journalist howard amos in odessa: cnn
|
Russia's basically looking for a pretext to invade Ukraine. Expect invasion within the next month.
At least the Ukrainians are finally standing up for themselves. In an actual fight they'll lose badly, but an actual fight will also badly damage Russia.
Western sanctions will come down HARD in case of Russian invasion. Furthermore, every country in Europe will instantaneously view Russia as a threat and respond accordingly. The Cold War will start again. Finally it proves Russia can't expand it's economic union peacefully, which is rather embarrassing. And there's the prospect of further unrest and possibly civil war.
Apparently the only way Putin can get people to join his union is to invade them.
|
|
On May 03 2014 09:47 nunez wrote: i think the suggestion of zeo trolling or being a paid shill is ludicrous. the killings in odessa are upsetting. Their methods were terrible, no one's disagreeing or being an apologist for what the pro-Maidans did. However, that does not give zeo the right to be so obnoxious and call for even more bloodshed.
Both sides just need to take a chill pill and wait for the 25th. There's no need for any more shitstorms to break out of their baskets for the time being.
|
On May 03 2014 16:03 sgtnoobkilla wrote:Show nested quote +On May 03 2014 09:47 nunez wrote: i think the suggestion of zeo trolling or being a paid shill is ludicrous. the killings in odessa are upsetting. Their methods were terrible, no one's disagreeing or being an apologist for what the pro-Maidans did. However, that does not give zeo the right to be so obnoxious and call for even more bloodshed. Both sides just need to take a chill pill and wait for the 25th. There's no need for any more shitstorms to break out of their baskets for the time being. Are you implying that the government that is funding the groups that murdered all those people yesterday is in any way capable of holding elections?
Who is going to restore order? The people that came to power in a coup? The guys who fire and appoint high-court judges at will, who don't even controll their own police and army and have to resort to arming the thugs on the street?
I wonder who the ten civilians killed last night in Kramatorsk by the maidan-controlled military are going to vote for.
|
On May 03 2014 08:29 zeo wrote: Why aren't you posting Carl Bilts tweets about how those people deserved to die istead of a wall of text about nothing?
Isn't there something on twitter about 40 people dieing or are your twitter 'sources' not paid to post news?
This isn't a response to Zeo, this is an exposition of why I don't respond to his posts. He responded to me specifically with this clearly antagonistic post in broken English, and it came a few posts after I posted this:
https://tw itter.com/carlbildt/status/462318885954666496 <- If not showing, remove space
What this shows is that he is ignoring facts, he is ignoring anything people post in this thread, he has a single agenda: to post pro-russia posts as often as possible, and as nastily as possible. There is no discussion possible with him, because he is not bound to facts, reason or even reading other people's posts. All it will accomplish to respond to him is to create filler for this thread so that actual facts and discussion is less likely. So, please, stop responding to him. And shame on anyone who is supporting this guy.
***
This is worrying, but if Russia will invade, it will do so sooner rather than later. But I think they are stalling.
***
***
This is in the Guardian of all places:
Two weeks ago I stood and watched as three groups of heavily armed men in military uniforms entered a police station in Slavyansk. One of them, a friendly fellow who spoke some English, later confessed to being a Russian marine who had served in Chechnya; this was an unsurprising revelation, since he talked also of serial skydiving and had an assault rifle issued to Moscow's armed forces slung across his back. There is little doubt that a despotic regime in Russia is, slowly but surely, dismembering its neighbour. First Crimea, speedily annexed with barely a whimper from the west, and now the wealthy industrial heartlands of east Ukraine. If it were a conventional military invasion, there would be worldwide outcry. Instead, strategic sites are taken over in camouflaged attacks that confound critics, while a barrage of parodic propaganda pumped out by Vladimir Putin confuses the core issues. It is worth remembering at the heart of this struggle, so often portrayed as some kind of great game played by global powers, is the desire of Ukraine's people to share the purest European dream of freedom and prosperity. After decades of Soviet rule, followed by sordid cronyism and corruption that followed its collapse and led to such stagnation, these people want a better life. Even now, with crisis crippling their country and an inexperienced interim government, polls show Ukrainians becoming more optimistic over their future. The number who feel their country is moving in the right direction has doubled since February, while there is significantly greater support for joining the European Union. Moscow's intervention is merely solidifying a fledgling democracy's sense of identity. Putin's initial attempts to foment unrest in eastern Ukraine struggled to take off beyond the bedrock of pro-Russian fanatics. Ringleaders were rounded up, demonstrations sparsely attended. Now the pugnacious president is doing all he can to stoke up tensions in the Donbass region, presumably hoping for a bloodbath to balance against the slaughter of protesters in Maidan, while exploiting cultural, economic, linguistic and even religious fissures in the afflicted area. He seeks to recreate Russia's empire, bound together with Orthodox religion and Slavic brotherhood. This is one reason the rather nondescript city of Slavyansk is so significant, with the generic word "Slav" at its root – along with a massive arms dump nearby containing millions of light weapons. An attempt by Kiev nine days ago to oust armed separatists prompted Moscow's forces to edge closer to the border. Today's "anti-terrorist" offensive there, in which there were fatalities on both sides, was a critical test of Russian resolve. Meanwhile the economic side of the equation is increasingly important. Just as in Crimea, many eastern Ukrainians – from pensioners to police officers – told me they were seduced by Moscow's fiscal strength. Some yearn for Soviet-era stability. With their currency tumbling, the economy crumbling and incomes falling amid unrest, it is easy to point the finger at the supposed "fascists" in Kiev and blame their "coup" for the current financial pain. We can only guess at Putin's endgame, although he is a more pragmatic politician than often presumed. Does he want full-scale military intervention or just managed chaos? Is his desire for proxy buffer states on his border, or just to ruin Ukraine's elections later this month? Regardless, the solutions must be diplomatic – although it is hard to see how, when the recent Geneva "de-escalation" deal was wilfully sabotaged by his stooges in Donetsk. Yet, while many Ukrainians lust after a European future, they are spurned by a divided continent that talks tough but delivers only the mildest rebukes to Moscow. The most recent set of EU sanctions were so weak they caused the Russian stock exchange to rebound. The British worry about the City of London, the French about defence deals, and Germans about their energy supplies and history. All this is understandable, especially at a time of economic recovery. But it is hard not to wonder if history will judge this the ultimate betrayal of Ukraine. Source
|
|
|
|