|
|
On April 11 2014 17:19 Noldo wrote:Show nested quote +On April 11 2014 17:16 Gorsameth wrote: Sigh oh look another new Russian in the thread who makes us repeat all the arguments we have had in the last 100+ pages...
That's how threads witn 50+ pages in internet works ;D And you can feel free and not answer me. :3 the answer to every single thing you said has been read the thread because its all been discussed and answered already.
|
Russian Federation39 Posts
On April 11 2014 17:20 zlefin wrote:Show nested quote +On April 11 2014 17:08 Noldo wrote:On April 11 2014 17:00 zlefin wrote: It's not pretending; human rights actually do matter to some. It can be hard to imagine that growing up in Russia; but there are places like that. There is places like that and people like that of course. But it's never governments of strong countries. I can't believe, that someone could argue with that On April 11 2014 17:00 zlefin wrote: Also, it's quite unclear what the actual opinions of people of crimea are; there's been far too much threat to get an accurate current assessment. It's unclear only for somone who never was in crimea and have no friends, who live there. Referendum was made under some pressure ofc, probably there was even some falsifications. But at least 60-70% of crimeans will vote to became part of russia even if we will replace russian forces with ukrainian and flood crimea with ukrainian mass media for year.. Governments of strong countries can be like that too; progress is being made in the world. Never is too strong a word. I disagree with those numbers; and anecdotes from friends don't go that far as evidence. At any rate, the referendum was illegitimate; and if the prospects were that good, why do an invasion when they could have just gone for a legitimate referendum? in terms of repeating things, the best solution is to edit-add stuff to original post or something first page-ish so people can just be pointed to that. Nope, people still the same. Not so many things changed in last 1000 years. Our life changed only because progress changing our environment. And also, if russian forces was not entered to crimea, lot of deaths was more than possible, and our fleet was in danger. Is it acceptable? Ofc no.
On April 11 2014 17:21 Gorsameth wrote:Show nested quote +On April 11 2014 17:19 Noldo wrote:On April 11 2014 17:16 Gorsameth wrote: Sigh oh look another new Russian in the thread who makes us repeat all the arguments we have had in the last 100+ pages...
That's how threads witn 50+ pages in internet works ;D And you can feel free and not answer me. :3 the answer to every single thing you said has been read the thread because its all been discussed and answered already. I know it. So what? If you already answered that to someone, you can just go through, someone else will answer me.
|
On April 11 2014 17:08 Noldo wrote:Show nested quote +On April 11 2014 17:00 zlefin wrote: It's not pretending; human rights actually do matter to some. It can be hard to imagine that growing up in Russia; but there are places like that. There is places like thar and people like that of course. But it's never governments of strong countries. I can't believe, that someone could argue with that Show nested quote +On April 11 2014 17:00 zlefin wrote: Also, it's quite unclear what the actual opinions of people of crimea are; there's been far too much threat to get an accurate current assessment. It's unclear only for somone who never was in crimea and have no friends, who live there. Referendum was made under some pressure ofc, probably there was even some falsifications. But at least 60-70% of crimeans will vote to became part of russia even if we will replace russian forces with ukrainian and flood crimea with ukrainian mass media for year.. So most Crimeans were for Ukrainian Independence in 1991 (i.e. they didn't want to be part of Russia, they wanted to be part of Ukraine) : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ukrainian_independence_referendum,_1991
Having friends in Crimea won't convince anyone but yourself. Visiting a region and having friends there, doesn't make you an authority on what percentage of the populations wants this/believes this. Especially in a divided region.
It seems like polls are inconclusive before the Russian invasion + propaganda http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crimean_status_referendum,_2014#Polling Some give Crimean independence a majority, some a minority.
My opinion is that over 50% of Crimeans asked in a fair vote would vote for independence. Yes they have been subject to Russian media propaganda for a long time, but you can't change that. But that's my opinion, and we don't have anything conclusive to tell us that without Russian invasion that most people would vote yes.
|
On April 11 2014 17:30 Mc wrote:Show nested quote +On April 11 2014 17:08 Noldo wrote:On April 11 2014 17:00 zlefin wrote: It's not pretending; human rights actually do matter to some. It can be hard to imagine that growing up in Russia; but there are places like that. There is places like thar and people like that of course. But it's never governments of strong countries. I can't believe, that someone could argue with that On April 11 2014 17:00 zlefin wrote: Also, it's quite unclear what the actual opinions of people of crimea are; there's been far too much threat to get an accurate current assessment. It's unclear only for somone who never was in crimea and have no friends, who live there. Referendum was made under some pressure ofc, probably there was even some falsifications. But at least 60-70% of crimeans will vote to became part of russia even if we will replace russian forces with ukrainian and flood crimea with ukrainian mass media for year.. So most Crimeans were for Ukrainian Independence in 1991 (i.e. they didn't want to be part of Russia, they wanted to be part of Ukraine) : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ukrainian_independence_referendum,_1991Having friends in Crimea won't convince anyone but yourself. Visiting a region and having friends there, doesn't make you an authority on what percentage of the populations wants this/believes this. Especially in a divided region. It seems like polls are inconclusive before the Russian invasion + propaganda http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crimean_status_referendum,_2014#PollingSome give Crimean independence a majority, some a minority. My opinion is that over 50% of Crimeans asked in a fair vote would vote for independence. Yes they have been subject to Russian media propaganda for a long time, but you can't change that. But that's my opinion, and we don't have anything conclusive to tell us that without Russian invasion that most people would vote yes.
It's true: It wasn't a fair referendum. But without the Russian invasion Ukraine would have never ever allowed a referendum. So a fair referendum was never a possibility.
And the situation now is very different than the situation 20+ years ago. Russian-speaking or not, I would guess most parts of the population are very disappointed with the political and economical development of the Ukraine since then.
|
Russian Federation39 Posts
On April 11 2014 17:30 Mc wrote:So most Crimeans were for Ukrainian Independence in 1991 (i.e. they didn't want to be part of Russia, they wanted to be part of Ukraine) : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ukrainian_independence_referendum,_1991Having friends in Crimea won't convince anyone but yourself. Visiting a region and having friends there, doesn't make you an authority on what percentage of the populations wants this/believes this. Especially in a divided region. It seems like polls are inconclusive before the Russian invasion + propaganda http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crimean_status_referendum,_2014#PollingSome give Crimean independence a majority, some a minority. My opinion is that over 50% of Crimeans asked in a fair vote would vote for independence. Yes they have been subject to Russian media propaganda for a long time, but you can't change that. But that's my opinion, and we don't have anything conclusive to tell us that without Russian invasion that most people would vote yes. 37% is not "Most crimeans"
And captain obvious said me, that government overthrow, new economical crisis in ukraine and nacists in kiev have much more to do with referendum results, than 1 month of russian propaganda after "invasion". First thing, "new" government did - canceled last working law, describing status of russian language. Thanks to them, they gave us just another 10% in referendum ;D
On April 11 2014 17:37 Maenander wrote:
It's true: It wasn't a fair referendum. But without the Russian invasion Ukraine would have never ever allowed a referendum. So a fair referendum was never a possibility. Exactly.
|
|
|
On April 11 2014 17:40 Noldo wrote:Show nested quote +On April 11 2014 17:30 Mc wrote:So most Crimeans were for Ukrainian Independence in 1991 (i.e. they didn't want to be part of Russia, they wanted to be part of Ukraine) : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ukrainian_independence_referendum,_1991Having friends in Crimea won't convince anyone but yourself. Visiting a region and having friends there, doesn't make you an authority on what percentage of the populations wants this/believes this. Especially in a divided region. It seems like polls are inconclusive before the Russian invasion + propaganda http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crimean_status_referendum,_2014#PollingSome give Crimean independence a majority, some a minority. My opinion is that over 50% of Crimeans asked in a fair vote would vote for independence. Yes they have been subject to Russian media propaganda for a long time, but you can't change that. But that's my opinion, and we don't have anything conclusive to tell us that without Russian invasion that most people would vote yes. 37% is not "Most crimeans" And captain obvious said me, that government overthrow, new economical crisis in ukraine and nacists in kiev have much more to do with referendum results, than 1 month of russian propaganda after "invasion". First thing, "new" government did - canceled last working law, describing status of russian language. Thanks to them, they gave us just another 10% in referendum ;D Show nested quote +On April 11 2014 17:37 Maenander wrote:
It's true: It wasn't a fair referendum. But without the Russian invasion Ukraine would have never ever allowed a referendum. So a fair referendum was never a possibility. Exactly.
Please, Please, read the thread before spouting the same nonsense that has been debunked at least 5 times already. And there are no referendum results. 93%. Please. That is so obviously a purely fictious result i find it amazing that people actually act like it means ANYTHING at all. Or do you also believe that 100% of North Koreans elect Kim Jong Un every time they have an election. You probably even believe you have fair elections in Russia, right?
|
Russian Federation39 Posts
On April 11 2014 18:02 Simberto wrote:Show nested quote +On April 11 2014 17:40 Noldo wrote:On April 11 2014 17:30 Mc wrote:So most Crimeans were for Ukrainian Independence in 1991 (i.e. they didn't want to be part of Russia, they wanted to be part of Ukraine) : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ukrainian_independence_referendum,_1991Having friends in Crimea won't convince anyone but yourself. Visiting a region and having friends there, doesn't make you an authority on what percentage of the populations wants this/believes this. Especially in a divided region. It seems like polls are inconclusive before the Russian invasion + propaganda http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crimean_status_referendum,_2014#PollingSome give Crimean independence a majority, some a minority. My opinion is that over 50% of Crimeans asked in a fair vote would vote for independence. Yes they have been subject to Russian media propaganda for a long time, but you can't change that. But that's my opinion, and we don't have anything conclusive to tell us that without Russian invasion that most people would vote yes. 37% is not "Most crimeans" And captain obvious said me, that government overthrow, new economical crisis in ukraine and nacists in kiev have much more to do with referendum results, than 1 month of russian propaganda after "invasion". First thing, "new" government did - canceled last working law, describing status of russian language. Thanks to them, they gave us just another 10% in referendum ;D On April 11 2014 17:37 Maenander wrote:
It's true: It wasn't a fair referendum. But without the Russian invasion Ukraine would have never ever allowed a referendum. So a fair referendum was never a possibility. Exactly. Please, Please, read the thread before spouting the same nonsense that has been debunked at least 5 times already. Read 409 pages? Really? No, thank you, At least, i'm writing here from work :D
BTW. In hour or so, time, that ukrainian government gave to protesters in east to free government buildins, will finish. Lets hope, that there won't be any shooting and victims.
|
On April 11 2014 18:08 Noldo wrote:Show nested quote +On April 11 2014 18:02 Simberto wrote:On April 11 2014 17:40 Noldo wrote:On April 11 2014 17:30 Mc wrote:So most Crimeans were for Ukrainian Independence in 1991 (i.e. they didn't want to be part of Russia, they wanted to be part of Ukraine) : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ukrainian_independence_referendum,_1991Having friends in Crimea won't convince anyone but yourself. Visiting a region and having friends there, doesn't make you an authority on what percentage of the populations wants this/believes this. Especially in a divided region. It seems like polls are inconclusive before the Russian invasion + propaganda http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crimean_status_referendum,_2014#PollingSome give Crimean independence a majority, some a minority. My opinion is that over 50% of Crimeans asked in a fair vote would vote for independence. Yes they have been subject to Russian media propaganda for a long time, but you can't change that. But that's my opinion, and we don't have anything conclusive to tell us that without Russian invasion that most people would vote yes. 37% is not "Most crimeans" And captain obvious said me, that government overthrow, new economical crisis in ukraine and nacists in kiev have much more to do with referendum results, than 1 month of russian propaganda after "invasion". First thing, "new" government did - canceled last working law, describing status of russian language. Thanks to them, they gave us just another 10% in referendum ;D On April 11 2014 17:37 Maenander wrote:
It's true: It wasn't a fair referendum. But without the Russian invasion Ukraine would have never ever allowed a referendum. So a fair referendum was never a possibility. Exactly. Please, Please, read the thread before spouting the same nonsense that has been debunked at least 5 times already. Read 409 pages? Really? No, thank you, At least, i'm writing here from work :D BTW. In hour or so, time, that ukrainian government gave to protesters in east to free government buildins, will finish. Lets hope, that there won't be any shooting and victims. He has a point- no one is going to bother perusing dozens of pages, looking for an argument to refute their own. I like that he says he's "writing from work". Paid Russian troll!!?!!?!?!? I am kidding :D :D
And yeah, let's hope no one dies!
|
Russian Federation39 Posts
On April 11 2014 18:02 Simberto wrote:
Please, Please, read the thread before spouting the same nonsense that has been debunked at least 5 times already. And there are no referendum results. 93%. Please. That is so obviously a purely fictious result i find it amazing that people actually act like it means ANYTHING at all. Or do you also believe that 100% of North Koreans elect Kim Jong Un every time they have an election. You probably even believe you have fair elections in Russia, right? Elections in russia was not fair of course. But most people support putin, and there is no acceptable alternatives. So it's ok. All elections is just a show. In any country. You cant change your country's future by elections. It doesn't work so. Crimea referendum wasn't fair. But it result was logical and impossible to change. For now everything goes by only one possible way. And it was prepared by latest years.
|
Russian Federation39 Posts
On April 11 2014 18:12 Mc wrote:Paid Russian troll!!?!!?!?!? Dreams, dreams.... Best work possible :D
|
In reference to the 37% number, I stand corrected. Of the Crimeans who voted 54% were for joining Ukraine. 40% didn't vote, even though they had the option of voting 'NO' for Ukrainian independence. And I agree - what I posted if something lends credence to Crimeans wanting to be in Russia. In general people who are disillusioned vote for changing the status quo. In 1991 they were disillusioned and voted to leave Russia, and now a lot of Crimeans are disillusioned and want to join Russia (probably a majority although we don't have any conclusive polls, that weren't made under duress).
|
On April 11 2014 16:12 Noldo wrote:Show nested quote +On April 11 2014 15:59 Sub40APM wrote:On April 11 2014 14:01 Noldo wrote:On April 11 2014 07:05 Caladan wrote: That's a bit of a short-sighted statement. Russia is just as dependent on EU money as EU is dependent on Russian gas. In fact, Russia made nothing to get Crimea. Ukrainian politics and euromaidan did all that things on their own. h. Other than deploying 10,000 special forces, forced through a referendum, spent the last 3 months running propaganda that everyone in West Ukraine is a bandra lover -- the far right in the Presidential elections has 3% of support, less support than Russian Nazis have in Russia. Do you agree that more, than 50% of crimea people wanted crimea to became part of russia? Also: "Other than deploying 10,000 special forces" proof?
Lots of posts, very little content because Noldo hasn't read the thread. You don't need to read the entire thread, there's an excellent search function on TL, use it please. You will also find the last fair poll from Crimea reporting much less than 50 percent support for joining Russia. This is also showcased by the self proclaimed PM of Crimea having only a couple of seats in the rada. But the point is that the referendum was illegal in terms of Crimean procedural rules, the Ukrainian constitution and international law (explanation in the tjread). So it doesn't matter who supported what, the annexation was illegitimate.
|
Russian Federation39 Posts
On April 11 2014 18:22 Mc wrote: In reference to the 37% number, I stand corrected. Of the Crimeans who voted 54% were for joining Ukraine. 40% didn't vote, even though they had the option of voting 'NO' for Ukrainian independence. And I agree - what I posted if something lends credence to Crimeans wanting to be in Russia. In general people who are disillusioned vote for changing the status quo. In 1991 they were disillusioned and voted to leave Russia, and now a lot of Crimeans are disillusioned and want to join Russia (probably a majority although we don't have any conclusive polls, that weren't made under duress). Probably (as i see it). There is about 50/50 or 60/40 people who want to be part of russia. But it's only true if nothing significant happens. Now i'm sure, that its about 80-90% people who want to became part of russia, Why i think so? Ukraine too unstable now, it gdp rep capita much less and russia will invest much money to crimea. (How that perfect recreation zone was unprofitable xX Dont understand) If ukraine just invest money there in last years, gave slightly moe autonomy to them, and was stable, that amount wold be less than 50%. But now.. I see no reasons for anyone to want to be part of ukraine.
|
Russian Federation39 Posts
On April 11 2014 18:26 Ghanburighan wrote:
Lots of posts, very little content because Noldo hasn't read the thread. You don't need to read the entire thread, there's an excellent search function on TL, use it please. You will also find the last fair poll from Crimea reporting much less than 50 percent support for joining Russia. This is also showcased by the self proclaimed PM of Crimea having only a couple of seats in the rada. But the point is that the referendum was illegal in terms of Crimean procedural rules, the Ukrainian constitution and international law (explanation in the tjread). So it doesn't matter who supported what, the annexation was illegitimate. I read russian 400 page thread already, and seen lot of prooves. Just first time see "10000" number.
Also, lets not forget, that first who forget about ukrainian constitution was rada, who deposed president (constitution was forgotten while they did it)
|
On April 11 2014 18:33 Noldo wrote:Show nested quote +On April 11 2014 18:22 Mc wrote: In reference to the 37% number, I stand corrected. Of the Crimeans who voted 54% were for joining Ukraine. 40% didn't vote, even though they had the option of voting 'NO' for Ukrainian independence. And I agree - what I posted if something lends credence to Crimeans wanting to be in Russia. In general people who are disillusioned vote for changing the status quo. In 1991 they were disillusioned and voted to leave Russia, and now a lot of Crimeans are disillusioned and want to join Russia (probably a majority although we don't have any conclusive polls, that weren't made under duress). Probably (as i see it). There is about 50/50 or 60/40 people who want to be part of russia. But it's only true if nothing significant happens. Now i'm sure, that its about 80-90% people who want to became part of russia, Why i think so? Ukraine too unstable now, it gdp rep capita much less and russia will invest much money to crimea. (How that perfect recreation zone was unprofitable xX Dont understand) If ukraine just invest money there in last years, gave slightly moe autonomy to them, and was stable, that amount wold be less than 50%. But now.. I see no reasons for anyone to want to be part of ukraine.
Let me rephrase Incontrol, those numbers came straight out of your ass. The data that is available directly contradicts your numbers. Also, in terms of logic, Crimea was autonomous and de facto and de jure Russian speaking. There was no change with Yanukovich's fall to this status.
|
If the protests are fake and number of people protesting is insignificant, why do they need to bring police units from Poltava region, why do the local police refuse to do anything about it? Also if the "tiny number" of protesters doesn't represent the majority of the people, why not let them have their referendum and show the whole world, that Donbass region wants to be part of Ukraine. Surely with Ukraine's media telling people what to think and their special forces patrolling the streets ( much like Russia did in Crimea ), they can't lose this referendum under such " duress "?
|
On April 11 2014 18:38 Noldo wrote:Show nested quote +On April 11 2014 18:26 Ghanburighan wrote:
Lots of posts, very little content because Noldo hasn't read the thread. You don't need to read the entire thread, there's an excellent search function on TL, use it please. You will also find the last fair poll from Crimea reporting much less than 50 percent support for joining Russia. This is also showcased by the self proclaimed PM of Crimea having only a couple of seats in the rada. But the point is that the referendum was illegal in terms of Crimean procedural rules, the Ukrainian constitution and international law (explanation in the tjread). So it doesn't matter who supported what, the annexation was illegitimate. I read russian 400 page thread already, and seen lot of prooves. Just first time see "10000" number. Also, lets not forget, that first who forget about ukr ainian constitution was rada, who deposed president (constitution was forgotten while they did it)
Don't skirt your responsibility to acquaint yourself with the content of the thread. Doing so violates the ten commandments of tl. And it leads to worse content for everyone.
Two wrongs don't make a right anyway, but the argument goes that Yanukovich left his post. This makes it impossible to have a constitutional president. Hence elections were called for as early as possible. And a transitional caretaker government took over. This is a standard approach to such leadership crises. Russia didn't stop talking to Belgium or Italy when those were governed by caretaker governments.
|
Thinking about this crisis and its effect on European politics i came to conclusion that Poland and Germany will lose the most because of this. We are already being hit hard(Russians are starting to shuting down our food export). And Germany will be hit, once our election cycle concludes. Our next goverment will be a lot less cooperative. They wont forgot German/British stance on this, and they will want payback. Nothing superbad, but they will most likely stall (or even sabotage) any works on paneuropean financial regulation, put on hold (cancelation isnt likely) EuroZone accesion preparation, push our nuclear project forward. There is also some work to be done on our coal expert to Germany (which is expected go up 60% just this year).
Yaah we need Germany. But noone here is particulary happy about Germany going to bed with Russia (and we are still angry about NordStream).
|
Russian Federation39 Posts
On April 11 2014 18:42 Ghanburighan wrote: Let me rephrase Incontrol, those numbers came straight out of your ass. The data that is available directly contradicts your numbers. Also, in terms of logic, Crimea was autonomous and de facto and de jure Russian speaking. There was no change with Yanukovich's fall to this status. There were no any changes for crimea. But there is base for fear, that such changes going to appear. How do you think, if someone who fighted with terrorists against russians in 90th became significant person and doing what he want in Kiev, what should russian in ukraine think?
|
|
|
|
|
|