|
|
On March 03 2014 00:28 maybenexttime wrote:
The problem is, GB and France from the very beginning wanted to have USSR as their ally against Germany, and not Poland. They never intended to help us. What ? They were actually the agressors after the German invasion of Poland (It is France and England who declared the war, not Hitler). You could argue that their reaction was way too late (and that France's short term best interests would have been to remain neutral / side with Germany after 37-38) but you can't say that "they never intended to help us". That's just retarded. They failed to help you and that's it. And i would even say that France failed to help itself lol.
|
Transcript of Kerry interview:
***FULL TRANSCRIPT*** Bob Schieffer: We are joined now by Secretary of state John Kerry who is in Boston this morning. Mr. Secretary, thank you for being here. The Ukrainian Prime Minster says this morning that Russia’s actions amount to a declaration of war and he says we are on the brink of disaster. Do you agree with that? Secretary Kerry: Well it’s an incredible act of aggression it is really a stunning willful choice by president Putin to invade another country. Russia is in violation of the sovereignty of Ukraine. Russia is in violation of its international obligations. Russia is in violation of its obligations under the UN charter, under the Helsinki Final Act. Its violation of its obligations under the 1994 Budapest agreement. You just don’t in the 21st century behave in 19th century fashion by invading another country on completely trumped up pre-text. So it is a very serious moment but it is serious not in the context, Bob, of Russia-US it is serious in terms of sort of the modern manner with which nations are going to resolve problems. There are all kinds of other options still available to Russia. There still are. President Obama wants to emphasize to the Russians that there are a right set of choices that can still be made to address any concerns they have about Crimea, about their citizens, but you don’t choose to invade a country in order to do that. Bob Schieffer: The President spoke to Vladimir Putin we are told for 90 minutes yesterday. The White House is describing it as the toughest phone call of his presidency. DO you think it had any impact? Secretary Kerry: Well we are going to have to wait and see but I think it was a very important conversation. The President was very strong, he made absolutely clear that this is unacceptable and there will be serious repercussions if this stands. The President asked Mr. Putin, in fact told Mr. Putin that it was imperative to find a different path, to roll back this invasion and un-do this act of invasion. He pointed out the many different ways in which Russia could have chosen to act. I mean if you have legitimate concerns about your citizens go to the United Nations, ask for observers, engage the other country’s government. There were any number of choices available to Russia, Russia chose this brazen act aggression and moved in with its forces on a completely trumped set of pre-texts claiming that people were threatened and the fact is that is not the act of somebody who is strong that is the act of somebody who is acting out of weakness and out of a certain kind of desperation. We hope that Russia will turn this around. They can. Again and again all week President Obama and I and others have insisted that we believe there is a way to deal with this issue. This does not have to be a zero-sum game. It is not Russia versus the United States, Russia v Europe, this is about the people of Ukraine, the people of Ukraine are who initiated what happened there. Their President Yanukovich, supported by Russia lost all support, all legitimacy, he fled in the night, his own supporters deserted him, they went to their parliament and they voted according to their parliamentary process so this is a democratic process that has placed this new government where it is and president Putin and Russia ought to respect that. Bob Schieffer: Mr. Secretary, when you come right down to it, the President says there is a cost and I suppose there are certain diplomatic things you could do -- you could boycott the G8, and so on. But when you come right down to it, what can we really do here? I don’t suppose anybody thinks were going to declare war on Russia here and send military forces there. Secretary Kerry: Well there are very serious repercussions that can flow out of this. There are a broad array of options that are available, not just to the United States but to our allies. I spent yesterday afternoon on the phone with many of my counterparts. I talked to ten of the foreign ministers of those countries most engaged. The G8 plus some others and all of them, every single one of them are prepared to go to the hilt in order to isolate Russia with respect to this invasion. They’re prepared to put sanctions in place, they’re prepared to isolate Russia economically, the ruble is already going down. Russia has major economic challenges. I can’t imagine that an occupation of another country is something that appeals to a people who are trying to reach out to the world. And particularly if it involves violence. I think they’re going to be inviting major difficulties for the long term. The people of Ukraine will not sit still for this. They know how to fight. They’ve demonstrated remarkable bravery, Bob. And then you think about Yanukovich positioning his snipers on the rooftops of Kiev and not withstanding people falling to the right, to the left, these marchers kept on marching and they demanded their freedom and they demanded their opportunity to have their voice heard without a Kleptocracy and a tyranny governing them. I think Russia needs to think very carefully about the choice that it’s making. And there are visa bans, asset freezes, isolation with respect to trade, investment, American businesses may well want to start thinking twice about whether they want to do business with a country that behaves like this. These are serious implications. And I know from my conversations yesterday: everyone of our allies, friends are determined to stay united and to make clear there is a price attached to this kind of behavior. Bob Schieffer: Are we actually prepared , Mr. Secretary, to boycott the G8 meeting there? Secretary Kerry: Well, we’re absolutely prepared to. If we can’t resolve it otherwise, but the preference of my President, myself, the entire administration, is to resolve this. We’re not trying to make this a battle between East and West, we’re not trying to make this a cold war. Nobody wants this kind of action, there are many ways to resolve this kind of problem, as President Obama urged President Putin yesterday – this is the moment to engage directly with the government of Ukraine. This can be resolved, we’re prepared to mediate, to help, we’re prepared to provide economic assistance of a major assort; we want the Congress to join us in providing that assistance. We hope that this can be resolved according to the standards of the 21st century. And frankly to the standards of the G8. If Russia wants to be a G8 country, it needs to behave like a G8 country, and I guarantee you that everybody is determined that if this cannot be resolved in a reasonable, modern, 21st century manner, there are going to be repercussions. Bob Schieffer: Alright, well Mr. Secretary thank you so much for joining us this morning. Secretary Kerry: Thank you Source.
|
On March 03 2014 00:41 maybenexttime wrote:Show nested quote +On March 02 2014 23:06 Maenander wrote:On March 02 2014 22:43 zeo wrote: LOL Ghanburighan, nowhere in that post did I say everyone on Team Liquid was sucking Hitlers cock. For those without reading deficiencies it clearly says hard nationalists who of course see nazi collaborators as heroes.
Please stop, its getting sad. Nazi collaborators are long dead or old and sickly. Yes, the right-wing Ukrainians might be crazy nationalists, I heard some of those live in Serbia, too. But this is not the time to brush up the old Soviet rhetoric, we live in the 21st century. The Chinese might be correct in that some westerners still have a cold war mentality, but it seems that's actually a quite modern view compared to others ... You are being willingly blind. Support for Svoboda in the last elections. ![[image loading]](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/93/Svoboda-2012.png) This is the equivalent of neonazi party getting 30% of votes in Bavaria, Germany - in 2012... Those three provinces is where the genocide of Volhynia took place (probably the most brutal genocide in modern history of Europe), and people who sympathize with Svoboda consider murderers as their national heroes.
Why do you completely ignore the fact that Svoboda only got that many votes that one time and because it was used as a protest party?
|
What looks like an unbiased (couldn't even tell the writers own opinion about the whole thing) report from someone who visited the pro russian demonstration in Donetsk yesterday (russian text, mostly pictures): link He's been asking people waving russian flags for the time - most did not adjust their watches and replied with Moscows time (one hour in advance relative to Ukraine) before correcting themselves. I'm not saying this is definitive proof of anything but the amount of things pointing towards the fact that the pro-russian movement is not entirely of interior origin keeps rising.
|
On March 03 2014 00:22 DeepElemBlues wrote:Show nested quote +On March 03 2014 00:13 nunez wrote:On March 02 2014 23:35 DeepElemBlues wrote:On March 02 2014 23:25 lolfail9001 wrote:On March 02 2014 23:24 DeepElemBlues wrote:On March 02 2014 23:19 lolfail9001 wrote:On March 02 2014 22:58 Roman666 wrote:On March 02 2014 22:40 craaaaack wrote:US, Canada and France pulled out of upcoming G8 meeting. That's at least something I guess. Today the most important tv channel in Russia (1. channel - "Pervyj Kanal") reported about "more than 140k Ukrainians fleeing their country" and entering Russia at its western boarder. The clip they've been using was identified as being filmed at the western boarder of Ukraine, the cars and people shown are actually going to Poland. Source: + Show Spoiler + Russian media for you sir! Yeah, that's the funniest part of this :3. But then again, let's be clear, CNN used to do the same some time ago, so everyone's dirty here :D Yes when did CNN show people going from Country A to Country B but said they were actually going to Country C or anything like that in order to provide propaganda fodder for the US or any other government? August 2008, IIRC. I just happen to live in North Osetia  When in August 2008 did CNN report that people from Country going to Country B were actually going to Country C? Were you a Russian citizen before 2008, or are you one of the guys Russia gave passports to so it could then say there were Russian citizens it needed to "protect"? Pretty funny how two times in a row now when Russia wanted to bully and beat up a country it thinks it should still rule just because, it started minting new Russian citizens in those countries by the hundreds and thousands handing out passports like candy so it had a pretext to do what it wanted to do all along for reasons that had nothing to do with "protecting Russians." If only the US had smuggled fifty thousand US passports into Iraq and gave them out to whoever wanted one and then said "We gotta protect our citizens!" I guess it would have been okay then right? As for US hypocrisy and other hilarious bullshit from the useful idiot crowd (they know who they are), everybody knows what the real double standards and hypocrisies operating are. aha lolfail, i remember. As Mark Ames discovered, Georgian leaders were making collect calls to just about every influential person on Wall Street, convincing them that Georgia was the victim of Russian aggression even as Georgian rockets were leveling Tskhinvali. ... The pro-Georgian CNN effect was so strong, in fact, that CNN used footage of Tskhinvali for a report on the destruction in the Georgian town of Gori. source I looked it up and they used wrong footage when reporting about a Russian bombardment that actually happened. Here is an article about accusations of media bias then: http://variety.com/2008/scene/news/russia-claims-media-bias-1117990468/So CNN made a mistake or was careless, they didn't report something had happened that had not happened. Of course when you look it up you find Russian media and Marxist or generally anti-Western writers saying the whole thing was a fabrication there was no bombardment of Gori or the casualties were exaggerated etc. your charicature-like apologism is almost as comical and lazy as media coverage of the south-ossetian conflict.
CNN is not admitting any fault in the article you linked, so that is all speculation on your part. it's just some half-baked pr-response that i'm sure pervyj kanal will happily squeeze out for you if you press them. secondly it equates western coverage with agitprop, which was lolfail's point all along.
it's telling that you still have 'muricans on tl believing 'russian invasion of georgia' is an apt descriptor.
|
On March 02 2014 20:54 maybenexttime wrote:Show nested quote +On March 02 2014 20:46 Uriel_SVK wrote:On March 02 2014 20:38 maybenexttime wrote:On March 02 2014 20:22 Uriel_SVK wrote:On March 02 2014 20:13 zezamer wrote: NATO will collapse if they fail to protect a member
NATO has no obligations to Ukraine But USA and GB guarantee territorial integrity of Ukraine, if they dont respond to this invasion it could lead to much bigger problems They guarantee it as much as France and Great Britain guaranteed sovereignty of Poland before the Second World War.  Im from slovakia so i know how that ended  Maybe it would not end with second world war if GB and France would not ignore germany invasion. In 30's Poland actually offered France and GB to preemptively strike Germany before the country would be ready for a war, several times. After the Treaty of Versailles Polish army was much stronger than the German one, even though our state was just reestablished. Combined with forces of France and Great Britain this would've been a quick affair. They, however, declined. As for the war itself, I've read that French and British forces combined outnumbered German defence forces on their western border roughly 5:1 and German encampments were not even finished.
poland asked 6 times iirc
the thing to take in consideration is that ww1 was a huge trauma, with more than 30% of the active population who died / get severely wounded (the worst war of france's history), that's why declaring war wasn't very popular at this time (maginot line says it all about the mentality at this time)
and you are right about the outnumbered thing, even at the beginning of the annexion of poland by third reich, german generals feared until the very last moment that france attacked because at the time 100 divisions would have been able to get ready on the french side, while only 46 divisions were actually available for germans (and they were divised on two front)
as you said it could have been ended very quickly, unfortunately
|
It's interesting how many ww2 analogies we can find in this conflict. Instead of "why die for Danzig" we have "why die for Sevastopol" and instead of French/British guarantees for Poland we have American/British guarantees for Ukraine. Russia is using the same excuse they used in 1939. Some people even see similarity between Olympics in Sochi and nazi Olympics. Obviously all of those are huge exaggerations but it's still interesting to see.
|
On March 03 2014 00:44 Cheerio wrote:Show nested quote +On March 03 2014 00:15 craaaaack wrote: As being reported by both russian and non russian sources: russian forces are moving towards the eastern boarders of Ukraine. These forces were transported to western Russia during what Putin called previously "unrelated military exercises". (During exactly those which alarmed the international community before shit got real. Remember Kreml saying numerious times how it was unrelated to the situation in Kiev? THEY'VE BEEN FUCKING SHIPPING THEIR ARMY TOWARDS UKRAINE DURING THAT TIME.)
Short interview of some veteran military captain (who doesn't seem to be related to this stuff at all) by lifenews.ru: "The movement of the Russian forces onto Ukrainian territory is a necessary move by our government. Sadly the situation is in danger of turning into a blood bath, especially in Crimea, where the people in unity did not approve the change in Kiev. I myself as a military man understand this decision, as the countries of the west did not fulfill their promises and broke on what they agreed to do - now they have to be confronted by facts. "
That's bullshit. The day before russians got in, the protests before the Crimean Parliament had just a few thousands pro-Russian activists versus around 10000 Crimean Tatars + "Ukrainian" activists.
So what are you saying? That 58% of Russian people in Crimea dont want to live in Russia?
|
On March 03 2014 01:03 Liman wrote:Show nested quote +On March 03 2014 00:44 Cheerio wrote:On March 03 2014 00:15 craaaaack wrote: As being reported by both russian and non russian sources: russian forces are moving towards the eastern boarders of Ukraine. These forces were transported to western Russia during what Putin called previously "unrelated military exercises". (During exactly those which alarmed the international community before shit got real. Remember Kreml saying numerious times how it was unrelated to the situation in Kiev? THEY'VE BEEN FUCKING SHIPPING THEIR ARMY TOWARDS UKRAINE DURING THAT TIME.)
Short interview of some veteran military captain (who doesn't seem to be related to this stuff at all) by lifenews.ru: "The movement of the Russian forces onto Ukrainian territory is a necessary move by our government. Sadly the situation is in danger of turning into a blood bath, especially in Crimea, where the people in unity did not approve the change in Kiev. I myself as a military man understand this decision, as the countries of the west did not fulfill their promises and broke on what they agreed to do - now they have to be confronted by facts. "
That's bullshit. The day before russians got in, the protests before the Crimean Parliament had just a few thousands pro-Russian activists versus around 10000 Crimean Tatars + "Ukrainian" activists. So what are you saying? That 58% of Russian people in Crimea dont want to live in Russia? That 58% of Russian people in Crimea are not uniform in their opinion on the matter. To suggest otherwise is to gobble up Russian propaganda like a hog in a slop pen.
|
On March 03 2014 00:41 maybenexttime wrote:Show nested quote +On March 02 2014 23:06 Maenander wrote:On March 02 2014 22:43 zeo wrote: LOL Ghanburighan, nowhere in that post did I say everyone on Team Liquid was sucking Hitlers cock. For those without reading deficiencies it clearly says hard nationalists who of course see nazi collaborators as heroes.
Please stop, its getting sad. Nazi collaborators are long dead or old and sickly. Yes, the right-wing Ukrainians might be crazy nationalists, I heard some of those live in Serbia, too. But this is not the time to brush up the old Soviet rhetoric, we live in the 21st century. The Chinese might be correct in that some westerners still have a cold war mentality, but it seems that's actually a quite modern view compared to others ... You are being willingly blind. Support for Svoboda in the last elections. ![[image loading]](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/93/Svoboda-2012.png) This is the equivalent of neonazi party getting 30% of votes in Bavaria, Germany - in 2012... Those three provinces is where the genocide of Volhynia took place (probably the most brutal genocide in modern history of Europe), and people who sympathize with Svoboda consider murderers as their national heroes. The funny thing is that Ukrainian voters around the world voted (top right corner) for the party much more than Ukrainians in general: 23% against 10%. Guess the world is far more fascist than Ukraine on average.
|
Any news about the mobilization the junta called for yesterday?
|
On March 03 2014 01:05 farvacola wrote:Show nested quote +On March 03 2014 01:03 Liman wrote:On March 03 2014 00:44 Cheerio wrote:On March 03 2014 00:15 craaaaack wrote: As being reported by both russian and non russian sources: russian forces are moving towards the eastern boarders of Ukraine. These forces were transported to western Russia during what Putin called previously "unrelated military exercises". (During exactly those which alarmed the international community before shit got real. Remember Kreml saying numerious times how it was unrelated to the situation in Kiev? THEY'VE BEEN FUCKING SHIPPING THEIR ARMY TOWARDS UKRAINE DURING THAT TIME.)
Short interview of some veteran military captain (who doesn't seem to be related to this stuff at all) by lifenews.ru: "The movement of the Russian forces onto Ukrainian territory is a necessary move by our government. Sadly the situation is in danger of turning into a blood bath, especially in Crimea, where the people in unity did not approve the change in Kiev. I myself as a military man understand this decision, as the countries of the west did not fulfill their promises and broke on what they agreed to do - now they have to be confronted by facts. "
That's bullshit. The day before russians got in, the protests before the Crimean Parliament had just a few thousands pro-Russian activists versus around 10000 Crimean Tatars + "Ukrainian" activists. So what are you saying? That 58% of Russian people in Crimea dont want to live in Russia? That 58% of Russian people in Crimea are not uniform in their opinion on the matter. To suggest otherwise is to gobble up Russian propaganda like a hog in a slop pen. You are joking right?
|
Ukraine is preparing to defend itself against Russia, Ukrainian ambassador to UN says - @Reuters
Deputy Commander of naval base in Simferopol, Ukraine, says he will not surrender and is ready to fight - @MarquardtA
Ukraine says its navy still has full fleet of 10 ships in Crimean port of Sevastopol, which remain loyal to Kiev and have not disarmed - @Reuters
|
On March 03 2014 01:16 Liman wrote:Show nested quote +On March 03 2014 01:05 farvacola wrote:On March 03 2014 01:03 Liman wrote:On March 03 2014 00:44 Cheerio wrote:On March 03 2014 00:15 craaaaack wrote: As being reported by both russian and non russian sources: russian forces are moving towards the eastern boarders of Ukraine. These forces were transported to western Russia during what Putin called previously "unrelated military exercises". (During exactly those which alarmed the international community before shit got real. Remember Kreml saying numerious times how it was unrelated to the situation in Kiev? THEY'VE BEEN FUCKING SHIPPING THEIR ARMY TOWARDS UKRAINE DURING THAT TIME.)
Short interview of some veteran military captain (who doesn't seem to be related to this stuff at all) by lifenews.ru: "The movement of the Russian forces onto Ukrainian territory is a necessary move by our government. Sadly the situation is in danger of turning into a blood bath, especially in Crimea, where the people in unity did not approve the change in Kiev. I myself as a military man understand this decision, as the countries of the west did not fulfill their promises and broke on what they agreed to do - now they have to be confronted by facts. "
That's bullshit. The day before russians got in, the protests before the Crimean Parliament had just a few thousands pro-Russian activists versus around 10000 Crimean Tatars + "Ukrainian" activists. So what are you saying? That 58% of Russian people in Crimea dont want to live in Russia? That 58% of Russian people in Crimea are not uniform in their opinion on the matter. To suggest otherwise is to gobble up Russian propaganda like a hog in a slop pen. You are joking right? No.
|
On March 02 2014 23:35 DeepElemBlues wrote:Show nested quote +On March 02 2014 23:25 lolfail9001 wrote:On March 02 2014 23:24 DeepElemBlues wrote:On March 02 2014 23:19 lolfail9001 wrote:On March 02 2014 22:58 Roman666 wrote:On March 02 2014 22:40 craaaaack wrote:US, Canada and France pulled out of upcoming G8 meeting. That's at least something I guess. Today the most important tv channel in Russia (1. channel - "Pervyj Kanal") reported about "more than 140k Ukrainians fleeing their country" and entering Russia at its western boarder. The clip they've been using was identified as being filmed at the western boarder of Ukraine, the cars and people shown are actually going to Poland. Source: + Show Spoiler + Russian media for you sir! Yeah, that's the funniest part of this :3. But then again, let's be clear, CNN used to do the same some time ago, so everyone's dirty here :D Yes when did CNN show people going from Country A to Country B but said they were actually going to Country C or anything like that in order to provide propaganda fodder for the US or any other government? August 2008, IIRC. I just happen to live in North Osetia  When in August 2008 did CNN report that people from Country going to Country B were actually going to Country C? Were you a Russian citizen before 2008, or are you one of the guys Russia gave passports to so it could then say there were Russian citizens it needed to "protect"? Pretty funny how two times in a row now when Russia wanted to bully and beat up a country it thinks it should still rule just because, it started minting new Russian citizens in those countries by the hundreds and thousands handing out passports like candy so it had a pretext to do what it wanted to do all along for reasons that had nothing to do with "protecting Russians." If only the US had smuggled fifty thousand US passports into Iraq and gave them out to whoever wanted one and then said "We gotta protect our citizens!" I guess it would have been okay then right? As for US hypocrisy and other hilarious bullshit from the useful idiot crowd (they know who they are), everybody knows what the real double standards and hypocrisies operating are.
Funny, because the USA used the same narrative whenever it invaded a country in recent years: "to protect American citizens [in America, not the invaded country]" because that country was "perceived as a threat".
On March 03 2014 00:46 Boblion wrote:Show nested quote +On March 03 2014 00:28 maybenexttime wrote:
The problem is, GB and France from the very beginning wanted to have USSR as their ally against Germany, and not Poland. They never intended to help us. What ? They were actually the agressors after the German invasion of Poland (It is France and England who declared the war, not Hitler). You could argue that their reaction was way too late (and that France's short term best interests would have been to remain neutral / side with Germany after 37-38) but you can't say that "they never intended to help us". That's just retarded. They failed to help you and that's it. And i would even say that France failed to help itself lol.
Don't make me laugh. The aggressors? You mean dropping leaflets that said "war is bad" or some shit like that? Did you know that French soldiers were putting up signs that said "we are not shooting at you, please, don't shoot at us" (that was after they ventured like several kilometers into Germany only to move back immediately)?
+ Show Spoiler [wiki] +"Upon the Invasion of Poland by Nazi Germany in September 1939, Britain and France declared war on Germany. On 3 September a naval blockade of Germany was initiated, and an attempt was made to bomb German warships in harbour on 4 September. Most British bomber activity over Germany was the dropping of propaganda leaflets and reconnaissance. On 4 September, during a Franco-British meeting in France, it was decided that no major land or air operations against Germany would take place, and afterwards French military leader Gamelin issued orders prohibiting Polish military envoys lieutenant Wojciech Fyda and general Stanisław Burhardt-Bukacki from contacting him.[23] In his post-war diaries general Edmund Ironside, the chief of Imperial General Staff commented on French promises "The French had lied to the Poles in saying they are going to attack. There is no idea of it"."
"On 12 September, the Anglo French Supreme War Council gathered for the first time at Abbeville. It was decided that all offensive actions were to be halted immediately as the French opted to fight a defensive war, forcing the Germans to come to them. By then, the French divisions had advanced approximately 8 km (5.0 miles) into Germany on a 24-kilometre (15-mile) long strip of the frontier in the Saarland area. General Maurice Gamelin, ordered his troops to stop no closer than 1 km (0.62 miles) from the German positions along the Siegfried Line. Poland was not notified of this decision. Instead, Gamelin informed Marshal Edward Rydz-Śmigły that 1/2 of his divisions were in contact with the enemy, and that French advances had forced the Wehrmacht to withdraw at least six divisions from Poland. The following day, the commander of the French Military Mission to Poland, General Louis Faury, informed the Polish Chief of Staff — General Wacław Stachiewicz — that the major offensive on the western front planned for 17–20 September had to be postponed. At the same time, French divisions were ordered to withdraw to their barracks along the Maginot Line."
France and Britain supplied Poland with false information regarding their war effort pretty much throughout the whole duration of Germany's invasion of Poland. In Abbevill, 12.09.1939, when asked if France would consider attacking Germany if Poland managed to defend for longer than it was agreed, Gemlin replied "No. It will only buy us more time."...
Even before GB and France tricked Poland into this fake alliance (as well as during the war), French and British diplomats were trying to persuade USSR to ally with them. And they were doing this for years before the war started. It is pretty clear who they wanted to have as an ally. Even the agreement they signed with Poland guaranteed protection in case of an invasion by Germany, no mention of USSR whatsoever. British diplomat Alexander Cadogan, after the agreement was sign, noted in his diary (translated from Polish back to English): "While it may be cynical, this agreement does not give Poland any guarantees at all".
On March 03 2014 00:47 SilentchiLL wrote:Show nested quote +On March 03 2014 00:41 maybenexttime wrote:On March 02 2014 23:06 Maenander wrote:On March 02 2014 22:43 zeo wrote: LOL Ghanburighan, nowhere in that post did I say everyone on Team Liquid was sucking Hitlers cock. For those without reading deficiencies it clearly says hard nationalists who of course see nazi collaborators as heroes.
Please stop, its getting sad. Nazi collaborators are long dead or old and sickly. Yes, the right-wing Ukrainians might be crazy nationalists, I heard some of those live in Serbia, too. But this is not the time to brush up the old Soviet rhetoric, we live in the 21st century. The Chinese might be correct in that some westerners still have a cold war mentality, but it seems that's actually a quite modern view compared to others ... You are being willingly blind. Support for Svoboda in the last elections. ![[image loading]](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/93/Svoboda-2012.png) This is the equivalent of neonazi party getting 30% of votes in Bavaria, Germany - in 2012... Those three provinces is where the genocide of Volhynia took place (probably the most brutal genocide in modern history of Europe), and people who sympathize with Svoboda consider murderers as their national heroes. Why do you completely ignore the fact that Svoboda only got that many votes that one time and because it was used as a protest party?
Actually, they were slowly building up their support among voters:
![[image loading]](http://www.geocurrents.info/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/Svoboda_party_map_2006-2012.png)
On March 03 2014 00:59 Makro wrote:Show nested quote +On March 02 2014 20:54 maybenexttime wrote:On March 02 2014 20:46 Uriel_SVK wrote:On March 02 2014 20:38 maybenexttime wrote:On March 02 2014 20:22 Uriel_SVK wrote:On March 02 2014 20:13 zezamer wrote: NATO will collapse if they fail to protect a member
NATO has no obligations to Ukraine But USA and GB guarantee territorial integrity of Ukraine, if they dont respond to this invasion it could lead to much bigger problems They guarantee it as much as France and Great Britain guaranteed sovereignty of Poland before the Second World War.  Im from slovakia so i know how that ended  Maybe it would not end with second world war if GB and France would not ignore germany invasion. In 30's Poland actually offered France and GB to preemptively strike Germany before the country would be ready for a war, several times. After the Treaty of Versailles Polish army was much stronger than the German one, even though our state was just reestablished. Combined with forces of France and Great Britain this would've been a quick affair. They, however, declined. As for the war itself, I've read that French and British forces combined outnumbered German defence forces on their western border roughly 5:1 and German encampments were not even finished. poland asked 6 times iirc the thing to take in consideration is that ww1 was a huge trauma, with more than 30% of the active population who died / get severely wounded (the worst war of france's history), that's why declaring war wasn't very popular at this time (maginot line says it all about the mentality at this time)and you are right about the outnumbered thing, even at the beginning of the annexion of poland by third reich, german generals feared until the very last moment that france attacked because at the time 100 divisions would have been able to get ready on the french side, while only 46 divisions were actually available for germans (and they were divised on two front) as you said it could have been ended very quickly, unfortunately
I know and I sympathize with this reason. But France should've been simply honest with us instead of tricking us with Britain and shifting the first attack from France to Poland (and our minister of foreign affairs shuld've had more common sense not to accept the alliance...). That was incredibly immoral. At least when they succeeded in making Poland the first victim, they should've attacked Germany. T___T
|
On March 03 2014 00:46 Boblion wrote:Show nested quote +On March 03 2014 00:28 maybenexttime wrote:
The problem is, GB and France from the very beginning wanted to have USSR as their ally against Germany, and not Poland. They never intended to help us. What ? They were actually the agressors after the German invasion of Poland (It is France and England who declared the war, not Hitler). You could argue that their reaction was way too late (and that France's short term best interests would have been to remain neutral / side with Germany after 37-38) but you can't say that "they never intended to help us". That's just retarded. They failed to help you and that's it. And i would even say that France failed to help itself lol.
I suggest you to take history lessons, as GB in fact never wanted to help Poland in the first place. They decided 'to do so' when they saw not doing that would've been disaster to islands. Also on the side note: Polish people fighting and dying in GB airforces weren't even mentioned when it comes to storytelling. That fact was only accepted by GB after many years.
|
Take this crap to the WW2 discussion thread...
|
I would like to see how many russians living in the baltic countries will want to go back and live in Russia if similar situation occures.
|
On March 03 2014 01:26 farvacola wrote:Show nested quote +On March 03 2014 01:16 Liman wrote:On March 03 2014 01:05 farvacola wrote:On March 03 2014 01:03 Liman wrote:On March 03 2014 00:44 Cheerio wrote:On March 03 2014 00:15 craaaaack wrote: As being reported by both russian and non russian sources: russian forces are moving towards the eastern boarders of Ukraine. These forces were transported to western Russia during what Putin called previously "unrelated military exercises". (During exactly those which alarmed the international community before shit got real. Remember Kreml saying numerious times how it was unrelated to the situation in Kiev? THEY'VE BEEN FUCKING SHIPPING THEIR ARMY TOWARDS UKRAINE DURING THAT TIME.)
Short interview of some veteran military captain (who doesn't seem to be related to this stuff at all) by lifenews.ru: "The movement of the Russian forces onto Ukrainian territory is a necessary move by our government. Sadly the situation is in danger of turning into a blood bath, especially in Crimea, where the people in unity did not approve the change in Kiev. I myself as a military man understand this decision, as the countries of the west did not fulfill their promises and broke on what they agreed to do - now they have to be confronted by facts. "
That's bullshit. The day before russians got in, the protests before the Crimean Parliament had just a few thousands pro-Russian activists versus around 10000 Crimean Tatars + "Ukrainian" activists. So what are you saying? That 58% of Russian people in Crimea dont want to live in Russia? That 58% of Russian people in Crimea are not uniform in their opinion on the matter. To suggest otherwise is to gobble up Russian propaganda like a hog in a slop pen. You are joking right? No. Ofcourse it is bullshit. I don't even know why both of you argue about semantics. It's what some unrelated guy said and like everything else from lifenews.ru it's straight up russian propaganda. I really don't understand why you argue about this one thing in all of what he said. Look at what I previously marked in bold: [...]the countries of the west did not fulfill their promises and broke on what they agreed to do - now they have to be confronted by facts. What kind of promises did the west countries break that would legitimate what Russia is doing right now? He says: "The west did something bad and this got us mad. Now we do something bad back to them."
|
On March 03 2014 00:47 SilentchiLL wrote:Show nested quote +On March 03 2014 00:41 maybenexttime wrote:On March 02 2014 23:06 Maenander wrote:On March 02 2014 22:43 zeo wrote: LOL Ghanburighan, nowhere in that post did I say everyone on Team Liquid was sucking Hitlers cock. For those without reading deficiencies it clearly says hard nationalists who of course see nazi collaborators as heroes.
Please stop, its getting sad. Nazi collaborators are long dead or old and sickly. Yes, the right-wing Ukrainians might be crazy nationalists, I heard some of those live in Serbia, too. But this is not the time to brush up the old Soviet rhetoric, we live in the 21st century. The Chinese might be correct in that some westerners still have a cold war mentality, but it seems that's actually a quite modern view compared to others ... You are being willingly blind. Support for Svoboda in the last elections. ![[image loading]](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/93/Svoboda-2012.png) This is the equivalent of neonazi party getting 30% of votes in Bavaria, Germany - in 2012... Those three provinces is where the genocide of Volhynia took place (probably the most brutal genocide in modern history of Europe), and people who sympathize with Svoboda consider murderers as their national heroes. Why do you completely ignore the fact that Svoboda only got that many votes that one time and because it was used as a protest party? And still they got only ~10% of the overall vote. It might be true Svoboda's leaders are fascists of the worst kind, but most people who voted for them probably don't care a lot about history but are unhappy and frustrated about the current state of things. And they aren't even that many.
I just don't see how that is any confirmation for the propaganda that the Russian minority is in immediate danger, like it was implied so many times in this thread. I heard that parts of the Jewish community in Kiev supported the EuroMaidan, apparently they don't think they are in immediate danger if a new government is formed.
2 things are for certain:
The Ukraine is in desperate need of outside financial help. And no Ukrainian government that seriously tries to repress the Russian minority or tries to install racist policies has a chance to get any help from the EU whatsoever, not to mention Russia.
A fascist isolationist Ukraine is an almost impossible outcome.
|
|
|
|