• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 19:01
CEST 01:01
KST 08:01
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL21] Ro4 Preview: On Course12Code S Season 1 - RO8 Preview7[ASL21] Ro8 Preview Pt2: Progenitors8Code S Season 1 - RO12 Group A: Rogue, Percival, Solar, Zoun13[ASL21] Ro8 Preview Pt1: Inheritors16
Community News
Code S Season 1 (2026) - RO8 Results1Weekly Cups (May 4-10): Clem, MaxPax, herO win1Maestros of The Game 2 announcement and schedule !11Weekly Cups (April 27-May 4): Clem takes triple0RSL Revival: Season 5 - Qualifiers and Main Event12
StarCraft 2
General
Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - The Finalists Code S Season 1 (2026) - RO8 Results MaNa leaves Team Liquid Weekly Cups (May 4-10): Clem, MaxPax, herO win Code S Season 1 - RO8 Preview
Tourneys
2026 GSL Season 2 Qualifiers Maestros of The Game 2 announcement and schedule ! $5,000 WardiTV Spring Championship 2026 SC2 INu's Battles#16 <BO.9> Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2)
Strategy
Custom Maps
[D]RTS in all its shapes and glory <3 [A] Nemrods 1/4 players
External Content
Mutation # 525 Wheel of Misfortune The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 524 Death and Taxes Mutation # 523 Firewall
Brood War
General
vespene.gg — BW replays in browser Pros React to: TvT Masterclass in FlaSh vs Light BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ ASL21 Strategy, Pimpest Plays Discussions Flashes ASL S21 Ro8 Review
Tourneys
[ASL21] Semifinals B [Megathread] Daily Proleagues Escore Tournament StarCraft Season 2 [ASL21] Semifinals A
Strategy
Fighting Spirit mining rates [G] Hydra ZvZ: An Introduction Simple Questions, Simple Answers Muta micro map competition
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Warcraft III: The Frozen Throne Starcraft Tabletop Miniature Game PC Games Sales Thread
Dota 2
The Story of Wings Gaming
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas TL Mafia Community Thread Five o'clock TL Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread UK Politics Mega-thread YouTube Thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
The herO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread McBoner: A hockey love story Formula 1 Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
streaming software Strange computer issues (software) [G] How to Block Livestream Ads
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
How EEG Data Can Predict Gam…
TrAiDoS
ramps on octagon
StaticNine
Funny Nicknames
LUCKY_NOOB
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 2049 users

US Politics Mega-thread - Page 9756

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 9754 9755 9756 9757 9758 10093 Next
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.

In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up!

NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious.
Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action.
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
January 22 2018 18:29 GMT
#195101
On January 23 2018 03:25 ticklishmusic wrote:
And Nunes has his memo detailing wrongdoing at the FBI which he refuses to release.

"I have here in my hand a list of 205 . . . a list of names that were made known to the Secretary of State as being members of the Communist Party and who nevertheless are still working and shaping policy in the State Department. . . ."
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
Danglars
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States12133 Posts
January 22 2018 18:31 GMT
#195102
On January 23 2018 03:29 Mohdoo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 23 2018 03:26 Danglars wrote:
On January 23 2018 03:05 Toadesstern wrote:
i mean if it's a decent DACA bill it's easily a DEM win because they got everything they wanted. They just wanted the assurance that there will be a hearing and a bill for it.
Had they not hardlined on it there would not be a discussion scheduled for it in the first place, neither would there be a bill and if hell froze together and they somehow got it Trump would still veto it.

So claiming they got nothing is a bit silly. They got exactly what they wanted.
Now, wether or not it was worth will be seen after those 3 weeks. If the bill turns out a hot piece of garbage it will easily be a GOP win.


My state senator (and local 2020 heartthrob) thinks there wasn’t even a commitment made to go back on. It doesn’t square with people telling me they got exactly what they wanted. Otherwise, why go public.


In many ways, it doesn't matter if it was some kinda official guarantee. If democrats make such a clear gesture towards reaching an agreement, and things don't go well in 3 weeks, they can pretty much do whatever they want without being the bad guys. This is more of an optics thing, the fight happens again in 3 weeks. This just gives democrats more room to be obnoxious later.

I took her language to mean private commitment. As in, she doubts McConnell made any commitment to Schumer to later go back on. Nothing suggests official.
Great armies come from happy zealots, and happy zealots come from California!
TL+ Member
Mohdoo
Profile Joined August 2007
United States15743 Posts
January 22 2018 18:32 GMT
#195103
On January 23 2018 03:31 Danglars wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 23 2018 03:29 Mohdoo wrote:
On January 23 2018 03:26 Danglars wrote:
On January 23 2018 03:05 Toadesstern wrote:
i mean if it's a decent DACA bill it's easily a DEM win because they got everything they wanted. They just wanted the assurance that there will be a hearing and a bill for it.
Had they not hardlined on it there would not be a discussion scheduled for it in the first place, neither would there be a bill and if hell froze together and they somehow got it Trump would still veto it.

So claiming they got nothing is a bit silly. They got exactly what they wanted.
Now, wether or not it was worth will be seen after those 3 weeks. If the bill turns out a hot piece of garbage it will easily be a GOP win.

https://twitter.com/stevebruskcnn/status/955498423628726273
My state senator (and local 2020 heartthrob) thinks there wasn’t even a commitment made to go back on. It doesn’t square with people telling me they got exactly what they wanted. Otherwise, why go public.


In many ways, it doesn't matter if it was some kinda official guarantee. If democrats make such a clear gesture towards reaching an agreement, and things don't go well in 3 weeks, they can pretty much do whatever they want without being the bad guys. This is more of an optics thing, the fight happens again in 3 weeks. This just gives democrats more room to be obnoxious later.

I took her language to mean private commitment. As in, she doubts McConnell made any commitment to Schumer to later go back on. Nothing suggests official.


You're saying you think Schumer made up a conversation even thought it would be extremely easy for turtle to say he was lying? Is turtle saying it is a lie?
Logo
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States7542 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-01-22 18:33:34
January 22 2018 18:32 GMT
#195104
On January 23 2018 03:31 Danglars wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 23 2018 03:29 Mohdoo wrote:
On January 23 2018 03:26 Danglars wrote:
On January 23 2018 03:05 Toadesstern wrote:
i mean if it's a decent DACA bill it's easily a DEM win because they got everything they wanted. They just wanted the assurance that there will be a hearing and a bill for it.
Had they not hardlined on it there would not be a discussion scheduled for it in the first place, neither would there be a bill and if hell froze together and they somehow got it Trump would still veto it.

So claiming they got nothing is a bit silly. They got exactly what they wanted.
Now, wether or not it was worth will be seen after those 3 weeks. If the bill turns out a hot piece of garbage it will easily be a GOP win.

https://twitter.com/stevebruskcnn/status/955498423628726273
My state senator (and local 2020 heartthrob) thinks there wasn’t even a commitment made to go back on. It doesn’t square with people telling me they got exactly what they wanted. Otherwise, why go public.


In many ways, it doesn't matter if it was some kinda official guarantee. If democrats make such a clear gesture towards reaching an agreement, and things don't go well in 3 weeks, they can pretty much do whatever they want without being the bad guys. This is more of an optics thing, the fight happens again in 3 weeks. This just gives democrats more room to be obnoxious later.

I took her language to mean private commitment. As in, she doubts McConnell made any commitment to Schumer to later go back on. Nothing suggests official.



The comment to me seems more like a sarcastic/combative remark. Like she trusts McConnel so little that what he said doesn't register as a commitment, rather than McConnel didn't make it. But it's hard to say without hearing it and the context.
Logo
Mohdoo
Profile Joined August 2007
United States15743 Posts
January 22 2018 18:35 GMT
#195105
On January 23 2018 03:32 Logo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 23 2018 03:31 Danglars wrote:
On January 23 2018 03:29 Mohdoo wrote:
On January 23 2018 03:26 Danglars wrote:
On January 23 2018 03:05 Toadesstern wrote:
i mean if it's a decent DACA bill it's easily a DEM win because they got everything they wanted. They just wanted the assurance that there will be a hearing and a bill for it.
Had they not hardlined on it there would not be a discussion scheduled for it in the first place, neither would there be a bill and if hell froze together and they somehow got it Trump would still veto it.

So claiming they got nothing is a bit silly. They got exactly what they wanted.
Now, wether or not it was worth will be seen after those 3 weeks. If the bill turns out a hot piece of garbage it will easily be a GOP win.

https://twitter.com/stevebruskcnn/status/955498423628726273
My state senator (and local 2020 heartthrob) thinks there wasn’t even a commitment made to go back on. It doesn’t square with people telling me they got exactly what they wanted. Otherwise, why go public.


In many ways, it doesn't matter if it was some kinda official guarantee. If democrats make such a clear gesture towards reaching an agreement, and things don't go well in 3 weeks, they can pretty much do whatever they want without being the bad guys. This is more of an optics thing, the fight happens again in 3 weeks. This just gives democrats more room to be obnoxious later.

I took her language to mean private commitment. As in, she doubts McConnell made any commitment to Schumer to later go back on. Nothing suggests official.



The comment to me seems more like a sarcastic/combative remark. Like she trusts McConnel so little that what he said doesn't register as a commitment, rather than McConnel didn't make it. But it's hard to say without hearing it and the context.


"That's not an agreement. That's just hollow words and empty promises" sorta thing is how I took it.
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
January 22 2018 18:38 GMT
#195106
On January 23 2018 03:28 Danglars wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 23 2018 03:24 Plansix wrote:
The FBI agent and his texts throws a cloud over the investigation. But they fired the guy instantly and I don't think he was a lead on the investigation. But I fully expect the House Republicans to use this as a way to attack the investigation and the FBI. Especially when the investigation could lead to any congress member's campaign, because this isn't just about Trump.

On January 23 2018 03:24 Gahlo wrote:
On January 23 2018 02:52 Logo wrote:
On January 23 2018 02:46 farvacola wrote:
Turtle boy made the commitment publicly and in a manner he hasn't previously, so maybe there's reason to hope.


Didn't he do the same during the Tax bill to a few of the Republican holdouts?

What about the whole bump-stock thing?

-----

On another note, how is this CHIP extension being funded? Is it just a clean spending measure rather than the cut from medicare one? Is there anything else in this stopgap measure that's notable, but not headline worthy?

Congress has done nothing and a bunch of states(I believe it was somewhere in the mid teens) are trying to ban them at the state level.


Paul Ryan talked about debating it and then it died in the House. Because that man has no control over the floor or that chamber.

Mueller’s solid in there. Any firing and somebody else would resume.

This is about FBI rep and accusations of politicization without the DOJ. You don’t tell the FBI that six months of texts got disappeared, but they just told that to Congress. This will resonate.

The DOJ still oversees the FBI and this investigation. Losing those texts is not great, but I'm also confused why they couldn't get them again. Its not like there is only one copy in the world of those text exchanges. But beyond that, this one agent does not make the FBI suddenly more political. Having to investigate sitting elected officials made the FBI political because that is what always happens. Happened with Bill Clinton. Happened with Nixon.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
January 22 2018 18:42 GMT
#195107


Folks, 2018 is super weird. An NPR reporter just retweeted this and this guy works for the Federalist.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
Danglars
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States12133 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-01-22 18:47:47
January 22 2018 18:44 GMT
#195108
On January 23 2018 03:32 Mohdoo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 23 2018 03:31 Danglars wrote:
On January 23 2018 03:29 Mohdoo wrote:
On January 23 2018 03:26 Danglars wrote:
On January 23 2018 03:05 Toadesstern wrote:
i mean if it's a decent DACA bill it's easily a DEM win because they got everything they wanted. They just wanted the assurance that there will be a hearing and a bill for it.
Had they not hardlined on it there would not be a discussion scheduled for it in the first place, neither would there be a bill and if hell froze together and they somehow got it Trump would still veto it.

So claiming they got nothing is a bit silly. They got exactly what they wanted.
Now, wether or not it was worth will be seen after those 3 weeks. If the bill turns out a hot piece of garbage it will easily be a GOP win.

https://twitter.com/stevebruskcnn/status/955498423628726273
My state senator (and local 2020 heartthrob) thinks there wasn’t even a commitment made to go back on. It doesn’t square with people telling me they got exactly what they wanted. Otherwise, why go public.


In many ways, it doesn't matter if it was some kinda official guarantee. If democrats make such a clear gesture towards reaching an agreement, and things don't go well in 3 weeks, they can pretty much do whatever they want without being the bad guys. This is more of an optics thing, the fight happens again in 3 weeks. This just gives democrats more room to be obnoxious later.

I took her language to mean private commitment. As in, she doubts McConnell made any commitment to Schumer to later go back on. Nothing suggests official.


You're saying you think Schumer made up a conversation even thought it would be extremely easy for turtle to say he was lying? Is turtle saying it is a lie?

Right after ending the shutdown, you don’t want a prominent Senator expressing doubts that any deal was struck. If you’re the minority leader, this is a strike at your members confidence in you. Maybe you’re saying Harris is off her rocker? Should someone tell her how stupid she is to avoid embarrassment?
Great armies come from happy zealots, and happy zealots come from California!
TL+ Member
Danglars
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States12133 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-01-22 18:47:23
January 22 2018 18:46 GMT
#195109
On January 23 2018 03:42 Plansix wrote:
https://twitter.com/bdomenech/status/955510095043055616

Folks, 2018 is super weird. An NPR reporter just retweeted this and this guy works for the Federalist.

Well, the shutdown ended in three days and nothings on the record for what concessions Schumer got for the DACA bill (he has absolutely refused changes to chain migration and lottery). It’s very natural for some reporters to conclude Schumer took a licking now (but lives to fight another day with this short CR)
Great armies come from happy zealots, and happy zealots come from California!
TL+ Member
Mohdoo
Profile Joined August 2007
United States15743 Posts
January 22 2018 18:47 GMT
#195110
On January 23 2018 03:44 Danglars wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 23 2018 03:32 Mohdoo wrote:
On January 23 2018 03:31 Danglars wrote:
On January 23 2018 03:29 Mohdoo wrote:
On January 23 2018 03:26 Danglars wrote:
On January 23 2018 03:05 Toadesstern wrote:
i mean if it's a decent DACA bill it's easily a DEM win because they got everything they wanted. They just wanted the assurance that there will be a hearing and a bill for it.
Had they not hardlined on it there would not be a discussion scheduled for it in the first place, neither would there be a bill and if hell froze together and they somehow got it Trump would still veto it.

So claiming they got nothing is a bit silly. They got exactly what they wanted.
Now, wether or not it was worth will be seen after those 3 weeks. If the bill turns out a hot piece of garbage it will easily be a GOP win.

https://twitter.com/stevebruskcnn/status/955498423628726273
My state senator (and local 2020 heartthrob) thinks there wasn’t even a commitment made to go back on. It doesn’t square with people telling me they got exactly what they wanted. Otherwise, why go public.


In many ways, it doesn't matter if it was some kinda official guarantee. If democrats make such a clear gesture towards reaching an agreement, and things don't go well in 3 weeks, they can pretty much do whatever they want without being the bad guys. This is more of an optics thing, the fight happens again in 3 weeks. This just gives democrats more room to be obnoxious later.

I took her language to mean private commitment. As in, she doubts McConnell made any commitment to Schumer to later go back on. Nothing suggests official.


You're saying you think Schumer made up a conversation even thought it would be extremely easy for turtle to say he was lying? Is turtle saying it is a lie?

Right after ending the shutdown, you don’t want a prominent Senator expressing doubts that any deal was struck. If you’re the minority leader, this is a strike at your members confidence. Maybe you’re saying Harris is off her rocker? Should someone tell her how stupid she is to avoid embarrassment?


No, I think it is just posturing. Having a situation where Schumer barely has a grasp on his rowdy liberals is exactly the sort of "they're all crazy!" stuff somewhat-reasonable republicans have been doing as they negotiate various things. Having a restless, principled component is a good thing for democrats when it comes to negotiating in 3 weeks. They are going to be significantly less reasonable in 3 weeks and quotes like what you are describing will help.

Think of it like a tea party lite. That same kinda "yeehaw, enough al-uh-ready"
FueledUpAndReadyToGo
Profile Blog Joined March 2013
Netherlands30548 Posts
January 22 2018 18:50 GMT
#195111
On January 23 2018 03:42 Plansix wrote:
https://twitter.com/bdomenech/status/955510095043055616

Folks, 2018 is super weird. An NPR reporter just retweeted this and this guy works for the Federalist.

Wait who are the dragon eggs in this scenario
Neosteel Enthusiast
Mohdoo
Profile Joined August 2007
United States15743 Posts
January 22 2018 18:53 GMT
#195112
On January 23 2018 03:50 FueledUpAndReadyToGo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 23 2018 03:42 Plansix wrote:
https://twitter.com/bdomenech/status/955510095043055616

Folks, 2018 is super weird. An NPR reporter just retweeted this and this guy works for the Federalist.

Wait who are the dragon eggs in this scenario


Nuance of governance?
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-01-22 18:54:36
January 22 2018 18:54 GMT
#195113
On January 23 2018 03:46 Danglars wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 23 2018 03:42 Plansix wrote:
https://twitter.com/bdomenech/status/955510095043055616

Folks, 2018 is super weird. An NPR reporter just retweeted this and this guy works for the Federalist.

Well, the shutdown ended in three days and nothings on the record for what concessions Schumer got for the DACA bill (he has absolutely refused changes to chain migration and lottery). It’s very natural for some reporters to conclude Schumer took a licking now (but lives to fight another day with this short CR)

You are a deeply unfun person who totally missed the best part of that quote and the reason why I put it in the thread.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
brian
Profile Blog Joined August 2004
United States9641 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-01-22 19:08:42
January 22 2018 18:55 GMT
#195114
On January 23 2018 03:44 Danglars wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 23 2018 03:32 Mohdoo wrote:
On January 23 2018 03:31 Danglars wrote:
On January 23 2018 03:29 Mohdoo wrote:
On January 23 2018 03:26 Danglars wrote:
On January 23 2018 03:05 Toadesstern wrote:
i mean if it's a decent DACA bill it's easily a DEM win because they got everything they wanted. They just wanted the assurance that there will be a hearing and a bill for it.
Had they not hardlined on it there would not be a discussion scheduled for it in the first place, neither would there be a bill and if hell froze together and they somehow got it Trump would still veto it.

So claiming they got nothing is a bit silly. They got exactly what they wanted.
Now, wether or not it was worth will be seen after those 3 weeks. If the bill turns out a hot piece of garbage it will easily be a GOP win.

https://twitter.com/stevebruskcnn/status/955498423628726273
My state senator (and local 2020 heartthrob) thinks there wasn’t even a commitment made to go back on. It doesn’t square with people telling me they got exactly what they wanted. Otherwise, why go public.


In many ways, it doesn't matter if it was some kinda official guarantee. If democrats make such a clear gesture towards reaching an agreement, and things don't go well in 3 weeks, they can pretty much do whatever they want without being the bad guys. This is more of an optics thing, the fight happens again in 3 weeks. This just gives democrats more room to be obnoxious later.

I took her language to mean private commitment. As in, she doubts McConnell made any commitment to Schumer to later go back on. Nothing suggests official.


You're saying you think Schumer made up a conversation even thought it would be extremely easy for turtle to say he was lying? Is turtle saying it is a lie?

Right after ending the shutdown, you don’t want a prominent Senator expressing doubts that any deal was struck. If you’re the minority leader, this is a strike at your members confidence in you. Maybe you’re saying Harris is off her rocker? Should someone tell her how stupid she is to avoid embarrassment?


it seems to me like she just has no confidence in McConnell’s integrity, just as none of us do. though i agree it’s bad optics on a technical level, i don’t think there’s anything particularly scandalous about expressing your lack of confidence in a known shit heel.

granted none of us are senators, we’ve all come to that same conclusion. i’m leaving room to be pleasantly surprised at him keeping his word, but have a healthy skepticism. i too would say no deal was made until it’s voted on, because the fact is the senate has been, at best, inconsistent.

i would go a little further and say no side has any shutdown victory. instead Schumer has just given everyone a clean slate(or taken it depending on your perspective) and set up the GOP to either pass DACA legislation(win/win because everyone wants it right?) or take an even bigger loss in 3 weeks.
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
January 22 2018 19:01 GMT
#195115
No one should be surprised if other Senate Democrats voice doubts that McConnell can follow through. Because his about to control his own chamber has been poor at best. Same with Ryan and the House. The last time the Senate voted in immigration, it just died in the house without even a floor debate.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
TheTenthDoc
Profile Blog Joined February 2011
United States9561 Posts
January 22 2018 19:14 GMT
#195116
On January 23 2018 03:25 ticklishmusic wrote:
And Nunes has his memo detailing wrongdoing at the FBI which he refuses to release.


He won't even release it the director of the FBI, apparently.
IyMoon
Profile Joined April 2016
United States1249 Posts
January 22 2018 19:15 GMT
#195117
On January 23 2018 04:14 TheTenthDoc wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 23 2018 03:25 ticklishmusic wrote:
And Nunes has his memo detailing wrongdoing at the FBI which he refuses to release.


He won't even release it the director of the FBI, apparently.


Because its nothing. This is just something so the crazies can get all riled up
Something witty
Introvert
Profile Joined April 2011
United States4951 Posts
January 22 2018 19:15 GMT
#195118
They support the same bill but a week shorter and with a pinky promise from McConnell. It's certainly not the activists on the dem side were demanding (See Harris, Kamala). Future circumstances can change but this looks like treading water at best for Democrats.
"But, as the conservative understands it, modification of the rules should always reflect, and never impose, a change in the activities and beliefs of those who are subject to them, and should never on any occasion be so great as to destroy the ensemble."
IyMoon
Profile Joined April 2016
United States1249 Posts
January 22 2018 19:16 GMT
#195119
On January 23 2018 04:15 Introvert wrote:
They support the same bill but a week shorter and with a pinky promise from McConnell. It's certainly not the activists on the dem side were demanding (See Harris, Kamala). Future circumstances can change but this looks like treading water at best for Democrats.


I think this is a great play for the long game. If the R can't keep their promises then the next shutdown in 3 weeks has a whole new reason behind it.
Something witty
Introvert
Profile Joined April 2011
United States4951 Posts
January 22 2018 19:16 GMT
#195120
On January 23 2018 04:15 IyMoon wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 23 2018 04:14 TheTenthDoc wrote:
On January 23 2018 03:25 ticklishmusic wrote:
And Nunes has his memo detailing wrongdoing at the FBI which he refuses to release.


He won't even release it the director of the FBI, apparently.


Because its nothing. This is just something so the crazies can get all riled up


I thought that at the very least the committee has to vote to release it. I can see why the Democrats would block the memo, but I think they are also blocking the whole thing.

I don't think Nunes can release it by himself.
"But, as the conservative understands it, modification of the rules should always reflect, and never impose, a change in the activities and beliefs of those who are subject to them, and should never on any occasion be so great as to destroy the ensemble."
Prev 1 9754 9755 9756 9757 9758 10093 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
The PiG Daily
21:30
Best Games
Maru vs Rogue
ByuN vs herO
Maru vs Classic
SHIN vs Zoun
Clem vs MaxPax
SHIN vs ByuN
PiGStarcraft351
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
PiGStarcraft351
ByuN 346
NeuroSwarm 140
ProTech136
ViBE94
JuggernautJason73
StarCraft: Brood War
Calm 2563
Soulkey 151
firebathero 104
Dota 2
monkeys_forever395
League of Legends
Reynor121
Counter-Strike
fl0m8819
Other Games
gofns15464
summit1g9726
tarik_tv8968
FrodaN2493
C9.Mang0242
elazer68
Trikslyr43
Livibee34
PPMD16
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick213
BasetradeTV71
StarCraft 2
angryscii 29
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
[ Show 17 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• RyuSc2 36
• Adnapsc2 32
• Kozan
• Migwel
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• sooper7s
• intothetv
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
StarCraft: Brood War
• blackmanpl 44
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota21148
Other Games
• imaqtpie1426
• WagamamaTV221
• tFFMrPink 15
Upcoming Events
Korean StarCraft League
3h 59m
RSL Revival
10h 59m
Clem vs Rogue
Bunny vs Lambo
IPSL
16h 59m
Dewalt vs nOmaD
Ret vs Cross
BSL
19h 59m
Bonyth vs Doodle
Dewalt vs TerrOr
GSL
1d 8h
Cure vs herO
SHIN vs Maru
IPSL
1d 16h
Bonyth vs Napoleon
G5 vs JDConan
BSL
1d 19h
OyAji vs JDConan
DragOn vs TBD
Replay Cast
2 days
Monday Night Weeklies
2 days
Replay Cast
3 days
[ Show More ]
The PondCast
3 days
GSL
4 days
Replay Cast
5 days
GSL
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-05-14
WardiTV TLMC #16
Nations Cup 2026

Ongoing

BSL Season 22
ASL Season 21
IPSL Spring 2026
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 2
Acropolis #4
KK 2v2 League Season 1
BSL 22 Non-Korean Championship
SCTL 2026 Spring
RSL Revival: Season 5
2026 GSL S1
Heroes Pulsing #1
Asian Champions League 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
IEM Rio 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League S23 Finals
ESL Pro League S23 Stage 1&2

Upcoming

YSL S3
Escore Tournament S2: W8
CSLAN 4
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
HSC XXIX
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
Maestros of the Game 2
WardiTV Spring 2026
2026 GSL S2
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual
Stake Ranked Episode 3
XSE Pro League 2026
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.