• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 11:10
CET 17:10
KST 01:10
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL22] Finals Preview: Sweet Victory!12[ASL22] Ro4 Preview: Mirror Mirror6[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: Within Reach5[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: In A Tizzy11[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Holy Diver5
Community News
Weekly Cups (Oct 26 - Nov 1): MaxPax, herO, Solar win0Weekly Cups (October 19-25): Clem triples first in 5.0.175Evil Geniuses - shutting down23ISSL (IntoTheTV x SOOP SC2 League): Premier7Weekly Cups (October 12-18): 5.0.17 era begins1
StarCraft 2
General
No more SC2 streamers on team liquid? [D] Hacker peak in sc2 ? Liquibets sc2 season 30 Evil Geniuses - shutting down Weekly Cups (Oct 26 - Nov 1): MaxPax, herO, Solar win
Tourneys
Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament WardiTV Mondays ISSL (IntoTheTV x SOOP SC2 League): Premier Stellar Fest TWO the Moon (Dec 16-20) RSL goes to London! 2026 Offline Finals Nov 21-22
Strategy
[H] ZvP Mid-Late Game: Stalkers Collossi HT
Custom Maps
Starcraft 2 Advance [D] the control group Simple Questions/Answers [G] How to playtest arcade maps
External Content
Mutation # 550 Graveyard Shift The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 549 Endless Sparkles Mutation # 548 Shining Bright
Brood War
General
BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Sagi.gg Launcher Released Top Players of October 2026 (EBPD Rankings) BW General Discussion Rollback Netcode in Brood War
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 4 [Mixed-Gender CK] Rush+4 vs Best+4 [BSL23] RO24 Group F - Sunday 21:00 CET
Strategy
50,000-Word Terran Builds Memo 2026-10-22 Cliff Jump Revisited (1 in a 1000 strategy) Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Deus Ex 3!? Mobile Legends: Bang Bang Armies of Exigo - YesYes?
Dota 2
Dota 2 Champions League Season 3 Begins April 25!
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine The Chess Thread
Fan Clubs
Fan Club Resource Thread Reynor Fan Club The Flash Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece
Sports
Football (Soccer) Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
Why I built Repalyzer (1.1.…
BlueStar
Innovate or Game Over?
TrAiDoS
ShieldBattery on Mac
Kraekkling
[ASL22] Ro4 Day1 Ticket Giv…
bITt.mAN
Can Bots Beat Pros?? Starcr…
namkraft
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 13464 users

US Politics Mega-thread - Page 9756

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 9754 9755 9756 9757 9758 10093 Next
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.

In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up!

NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious.
Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action.
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
January 22 2018 18:29 GMT
#195101
On January 23 2018 03:25 ticklishmusic wrote:
And Nunes has his memo detailing wrongdoing at the FBI which he refuses to release.

"I have here in my hand a list of 205 . . . a list of names that were made known to the Secretary of State as being members of the Communist Party and who nevertheless are still working and shaping policy in the State Department. . . ."
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
Danglars
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States12133 Posts
January 22 2018 18:31 GMT
#195102
On January 23 2018 03:29 Mohdoo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 23 2018 03:26 Danglars wrote:
On January 23 2018 03:05 Toadesstern wrote:
i mean if it's a decent DACA bill it's easily a DEM win because they got everything they wanted. They just wanted the assurance that there will be a hearing and a bill for it.
Had they not hardlined on it there would not be a discussion scheduled for it in the first place, neither would there be a bill and if hell froze together and they somehow got it Trump would still veto it.

So claiming they got nothing is a bit silly. They got exactly what they wanted.
Now, wether or not it was worth will be seen after those 3 weeks. If the bill turns out a hot piece of garbage it will easily be a GOP win.


My state senator (and local 2020 heartthrob) thinks there wasn’t even a commitment made to go back on. It doesn’t square with people telling me they got exactly what they wanted. Otherwise, why go public.


In many ways, it doesn't matter if it was some kinda official guarantee. If democrats make such a clear gesture towards reaching an agreement, and things don't go well in 3 weeks, they can pretty much do whatever they want without being the bad guys. This is more of an optics thing, the fight happens again in 3 weeks. This just gives democrats more room to be obnoxious later.

I took her language to mean private commitment. As in, she doubts McConnell made any commitment to Schumer to later go back on. Nothing suggests official.
Great armies come from happy zealots, and happy zealots come from California!
TL+ Member
Mohdoo
Profile Joined August 2007
United States15743 Posts
January 22 2018 18:32 GMT
#195103
On January 23 2018 03:31 Danglars wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 23 2018 03:29 Mohdoo wrote:
On January 23 2018 03:26 Danglars wrote:
On January 23 2018 03:05 Toadesstern wrote:
i mean if it's a decent DACA bill it's easily a DEM win because they got everything they wanted. They just wanted the assurance that there will be a hearing and a bill for it.
Had they not hardlined on it there would not be a discussion scheduled for it in the first place, neither would there be a bill and if hell froze together and they somehow got it Trump would still veto it.

So claiming they got nothing is a bit silly. They got exactly what they wanted.
Now, wether or not it was worth will be seen after those 3 weeks. If the bill turns out a hot piece of garbage it will easily be a GOP win.

https://twitter.com/stevebruskcnn/status/955498423628726273
My state senator (and local 2020 heartthrob) thinks there wasn’t even a commitment made to go back on. It doesn’t square with people telling me they got exactly what they wanted. Otherwise, why go public.


In many ways, it doesn't matter if it was some kinda official guarantee. If democrats make such a clear gesture towards reaching an agreement, and things don't go well in 3 weeks, they can pretty much do whatever they want without being the bad guys. This is more of an optics thing, the fight happens again in 3 weeks. This just gives democrats more room to be obnoxious later.

I took her language to mean private commitment. As in, she doubts McConnell made any commitment to Schumer to later go back on. Nothing suggests official.


You're saying you think Schumer made up a conversation even thought it would be extremely easy for turtle to say he was lying? Is turtle saying it is a lie?
Logo
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States7542 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-01-22 18:33:34
January 22 2018 18:32 GMT
#195104
On January 23 2018 03:31 Danglars wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 23 2018 03:29 Mohdoo wrote:
On January 23 2018 03:26 Danglars wrote:
On January 23 2018 03:05 Toadesstern wrote:
i mean if it's a decent DACA bill it's easily a DEM win because they got everything they wanted. They just wanted the assurance that there will be a hearing and a bill for it.
Had they not hardlined on it there would not be a discussion scheduled for it in the first place, neither would there be a bill and if hell froze together and they somehow got it Trump would still veto it.

So claiming they got nothing is a bit silly. They got exactly what they wanted.
Now, wether or not it was worth will be seen after those 3 weeks. If the bill turns out a hot piece of garbage it will easily be a GOP win.

https://twitter.com/stevebruskcnn/status/955498423628726273
My state senator (and local 2020 heartthrob) thinks there wasn’t even a commitment made to go back on. It doesn’t square with people telling me they got exactly what they wanted. Otherwise, why go public.


In many ways, it doesn't matter if it was some kinda official guarantee. If democrats make such a clear gesture towards reaching an agreement, and things don't go well in 3 weeks, they can pretty much do whatever they want without being the bad guys. This is more of an optics thing, the fight happens again in 3 weeks. This just gives democrats more room to be obnoxious later.

I took her language to mean private commitment. As in, she doubts McConnell made any commitment to Schumer to later go back on. Nothing suggests official.



The comment to me seems more like a sarcastic/combative remark. Like she trusts McConnel so little that what he said doesn't register as a commitment, rather than McConnel didn't make it. But it's hard to say without hearing it and the context.
Logo
Mohdoo
Profile Joined August 2007
United States15743 Posts
January 22 2018 18:35 GMT
#195105
On January 23 2018 03:32 Logo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 23 2018 03:31 Danglars wrote:
On January 23 2018 03:29 Mohdoo wrote:
On January 23 2018 03:26 Danglars wrote:
On January 23 2018 03:05 Toadesstern wrote:
i mean if it's a decent DACA bill it's easily a DEM win because they got everything they wanted. They just wanted the assurance that there will be a hearing and a bill for it.
Had they not hardlined on it there would not be a discussion scheduled for it in the first place, neither would there be a bill and if hell froze together and they somehow got it Trump would still veto it.

So claiming they got nothing is a bit silly. They got exactly what they wanted.
Now, wether or not it was worth will be seen after those 3 weeks. If the bill turns out a hot piece of garbage it will easily be a GOP win.

https://twitter.com/stevebruskcnn/status/955498423628726273
My state senator (and local 2020 heartthrob) thinks there wasn’t even a commitment made to go back on. It doesn’t square with people telling me they got exactly what they wanted. Otherwise, why go public.


In many ways, it doesn't matter if it was some kinda official guarantee. If democrats make such a clear gesture towards reaching an agreement, and things don't go well in 3 weeks, they can pretty much do whatever they want without being the bad guys. This is more of an optics thing, the fight happens again in 3 weeks. This just gives democrats more room to be obnoxious later.

I took her language to mean private commitment. As in, she doubts McConnell made any commitment to Schumer to later go back on. Nothing suggests official.



The comment to me seems more like a sarcastic/combative remark. Like she trusts McConnel so little that what he said doesn't register as a commitment, rather than McConnel didn't make it. But it's hard to say without hearing it and the context.


"That's not an agreement. That's just hollow words and empty promises" sorta thing is how I took it.
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
January 22 2018 18:38 GMT
#195106
On January 23 2018 03:28 Danglars wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 23 2018 03:24 Plansix wrote:
The FBI agent and his texts throws a cloud over the investigation. But they fired the guy instantly and I don't think he was a lead on the investigation. But I fully expect the House Republicans to use this as a way to attack the investigation and the FBI. Especially when the investigation could lead to any congress member's campaign, because this isn't just about Trump.

On January 23 2018 03:24 Gahlo wrote:
On January 23 2018 02:52 Logo wrote:
On January 23 2018 02:46 farvacola wrote:
Turtle boy made the commitment publicly and in a manner he hasn't previously, so maybe there's reason to hope.


Didn't he do the same during the Tax bill to a few of the Republican holdouts?

What about the whole bump-stock thing?

-----

On another note, how is this CHIP extension being funded? Is it just a clean spending measure rather than the cut from medicare one? Is there anything else in this stopgap measure that's notable, but not headline worthy?

Congress has done nothing and a bunch of states(I believe it was somewhere in the mid teens) are trying to ban them at the state level.


Paul Ryan talked about debating it and then it died in the House. Because that man has no control over the floor or that chamber.

Mueller’s solid in there. Any firing and somebody else would resume.

This is about FBI rep and accusations of politicization without the DOJ. You don’t tell the FBI that six months of texts got disappeared, but they just told that to Congress. This will resonate.

The DOJ still oversees the FBI and this investigation. Losing those texts is not great, but I'm also confused why they couldn't get them again. Its not like there is only one copy in the world of those text exchanges. But beyond that, this one agent does not make the FBI suddenly more political. Having to investigate sitting elected officials made the FBI political because that is what always happens. Happened with Bill Clinton. Happened with Nixon.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
January 22 2018 18:42 GMT
#195107


Folks, 2018 is super weird. An NPR reporter just retweeted this and this guy works for the Federalist.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
Danglars
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States12133 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-01-22 18:47:47
January 22 2018 18:44 GMT
#195108
On January 23 2018 03:32 Mohdoo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 23 2018 03:31 Danglars wrote:
On January 23 2018 03:29 Mohdoo wrote:
On January 23 2018 03:26 Danglars wrote:
On January 23 2018 03:05 Toadesstern wrote:
i mean if it's a decent DACA bill it's easily a DEM win because they got everything they wanted. They just wanted the assurance that there will be a hearing and a bill for it.
Had they not hardlined on it there would not be a discussion scheduled for it in the first place, neither would there be a bill and if hell froze together and they somehow got it Trump would still veto it.

So claiming they got nothing is a bit silly. They got exactly what they wanted.
Now, wether or not it was worth will be seen after those 3 weeks. If the bill turns out a hot piece of garbage it will easily be a GOP win.

https://twitter.com/stevebruskcnn/status/955498423628726273
My state senator (and local 2020 heartthrob) thinks there wasn’t even a commitment made to go back on. It doesn’t square with people telling me they got exactly what they wanted. Otherwise, why go public.


In many ways, it doesn't matter if it was some kinda official guarantee. If democrats make such a clear gesture towards reaching an agreement, and things don't go well in 3 weeks, they can pretty much do whatever they want without being the bad guys. This is more of an optics thing, the fight happens again in 3 weeks. This just gives democrats more room to be obnoxious later.

I took her language to mean private commitment. As in, she doubts McConnell made any commitment to Schumer to later go back on. Nothing suggests official.


You're saying you think Schumer made up a conversation even thought it would be extremely easy for turtle to say he was lying? Is turtle saying it is a lie?

Right after ending the shutdown, you don’t want a prominent Senator expressing doubts that any deal was struck. If you’re the minority leader, this is a strike at your members confidence in you. Maybe you’re saying Harris is off her rocker? Should someone tell her how stupid she is to avoid embarrassment?
Great armies come from happy zealots, and happy zealots come from California!
TL+ Member
Danglars
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States12133 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-01-22 18:47:23
January 22 2018 18:46 GMT
#195109
On January 23 2018 03:42 Plansix wrote:
https://twitter.com/bdomenech/status/955510095043055616

Folks, 2018 is super weird. An NPR reporter just retweeted this and this guy works for the Federalist.

Well, the shutdown ended in three days and nothings on the record for what concessions Schumer got for the DACA bill (he has absolutely refused changes to chain migration and lottery). It’s very natural for some reporters to conclude Schumer took a licking now (but lives to fight another day with this short CR)
Great armies come from happy zealots, and happy zealots come from California!
TL+ Member
Mohdoo
Profile Joined August 2007
United States15743 Posts
January 22 2018 18:47 GMT
#195110
On January 23 2018 03:44 Danglars wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 23 2018 03:32 Mohdoo wrote:
On January 23 2018 03:31 Danglars wrote:
On January 23 2018 03:29 Mohdoo wrote:
On January 23 2018 03:26 Danglars wrote:
On January 23 2018 03:05 Toadesstern wrote:
i mean if it's a decent DACA bill it's easily a DEM win because they got everything they wanted. They just wanted the assurance that there will be a hearing and a bill for it.
Had they not hardlined on it there would not be a discussion scheduled for it in the first place, neither would there be a bill and if hell froze together and they somehow got it Trump would still veto it.

So claiming they got nothing is a bit silly. They got exactly what they wanted.
Now, wether or not it was worth will be seen after those 3 weeks. If the bill turns out a hot piece of garbage it will easily be a GOP win.

https://twitter.com/stevebruskcnn/status/955498423628726273
My state senator (and local 2020 heartthrob) thinks there wasn’t even a commitment made to go back on. It doesn’t square with people telling me they got exactly what they wanted. Otherwise, why go public.


In many ways, it doesn't matter if it was some kinda official guarantee. If democrats make such a clear gesture towards reaching an agreement, and things don't go well in 3 weeks, they can pretty much do whatever they want without being the bad guys. This is more of an optics thing, the fight happens again in 3 weeks. This just gives democrats more room to be obnoxious later.

I took her language to mean private commitment. As in, she doubts McConnell made any commitment to Schumer to later go back on. Nothing suggests official.


You're saying you think Schumer made up a conversation even thought it would be extremely easy for turtle to say he was lying? Is turtle saying it is a lie?

Right after ending the shutdown, you don’t want a prominent Senator expressing doubts that any deal was struck. If you’re the minority leader, this is a strike at your members confidence. Maybe you’re saying Harris is off her rocker? Should someone tell her how stupid she is to avoid embarrassment?


No, I think it is just posturing. Having a situation where Schumer barely has a grasp on his rowdy liberals is exactly the sort of "they're all crazy!" stuff somewhat-reasonable republicans have been doing as they negotiate various things. Having a restless, principled component is a good thing for democrats when it comes to negotiating in 3 weeks. They are going to be significantly less reasonable in 3 weeks and quotes like what you are describing will help.

Think of it like a tea party lite. That same kinda "yeehaw, enough al-uh-ready"
FueledUpAndReadyToGo
Profile Blog Joined March 2013
Netherlands30548 Posts
January 22 2018 18:50 GMT
#195111
On January 23 2018 03:42 Plansix wrote:
https://twitter.com/bdomenech/status/955510095043055616

Folks, 2018 is super weird. An NPR reporter just retweeted this and this guy works for the Federalist.

Wait who are the dragon eggs in this scenario
Neosteel Enthusiast
Mohdoo
Profile Joined August 2007
United States15743 Posts
January 22 2018 18:53 GMT
#195112
On January 23 2018 03:50 FueledUpAndReadyToGo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 23 2018 03:42 Plansix wrote:
https://twitter.com/bdomenech/status/955510095043055616

Folks, 2018 is super weird. An NPR reporter just retweeted this and this guy works for the Federalist.

Wait who are the dragon eggs in this scenario


Nuance of governance?
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-01-22 18:54:36
January 22 2018 18:54 GMT
#195113
On January 23 2018 03:46 Danglars wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 23 2018 03:42 Plansix wrote:
https://twitter.com/bdomenech/status/955510095043055616

Folks, 2018 is super weird. An NPR reporter just retweeted this and this guy works for the Federalist.

Well, the shutdown ended in three days and nothings on the record for what concessions Schumer got for the DACA bill (he has absolutely refused changes to chain migration and lottery). It’s very natural for some reporters to conclude Schumer took a licking now (but lives to fight another day with this short CR)

You are a deeply unfun person who totally missed the best part of that quote and the reason why I put it in the thread.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
brian
Profile Blog Joined August 2004
United States9644 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-01-22 19:08:42
January 22 2018 18:55 GMT
#195114
On January 23 2018 03:44 Danglars wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 23 2018 03:32 Mohdoo wrote:
On January 23 2018 03:31 Danglars wrote:
On January 23 2018 03:29 Mohdoo wrote:
On January 23 2018 03:26 Danglars wrote:
On January 23 2018 03:05 Toadesstern wrote:
i mean if it's a decent DACA bill it's easily a DEM win because they got everything they wanted. They just wanted the assurance that there will be a hearing and a bill for it.
Had they not hardlined on it there would not be a discussion scheduled for it in the first place, neither would there be a bill and if hell froze together and they somehow got it Trump would still veto it.

So claiming they got nothing is a bit silly. They got exactly what they wanted.
Now, wether or not it was worth will be seen after those 3 weeks. If the bill turns out a hot piece of garbage it will easily be a GOP win.

https://twitter.com/stevebruskcnn/status/955498423628726273
My state senator (and local 2020 heartthrob) thinks there wasn’t even a commitment made to go back on. It doesn’t square with people telling me they got exactly what they wanted. Otherwise, why go public.


In many ways, it doesn't matter if it was some kinda official guarantee. If democrats make such a clear gesture towards reaching an agreement, and things don't go well in 3 weeks, they can pretty much do whatever they want without being the bad guys. This is more of an optics thing, the fight happens again in 3 weeks. This just gives democrats more room to be obnoxious later.

I took her language to mean private commitment. As in, she doubts McConnell made any commitment to Schumer to later go back on. Nothing suggests official.


You're saying you think Schumer made up a conversation even thought it would be extremely easy for turtle to say he was lying? Is turtle saying it is a lie?

Right after ending the shutdown, you don’t want a prominent Senator expressing doubts that any deal was struck. If you’re the minority leader, this is a strike at your members confidence in you. Maybe you’re saying Harris is off her rocker? Should someone tell her how stupid she is to avoid embarrassment?


it seems to me like she just has no confidence in McConnell’s integrity, just as none of us do. though i agree it’s bad optics on a technical level, i don’t think there’s anything particularly scandalous about expressing your lack of confidence in a known shit heel.

granted none of us are senators, we’ve all come to that same conclusion. i’m leaving room to be pleasantly surprised at him keeping his word, but have a healthy skepticism. i too would say no deal was made until it’s voted on, because the fact is the senate has been, at best, inconsistent.

i would go a little further and say no side has any shutdown victory. instead Schumer has just given everyone a clean slate(or taken it depending on your perspective) and set up the GOP to either pass DACA legislation(win/win because everyone wants it right?) or take an even bigger loss in 3 weeks.
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
January 22 2018 19:01 GMT
#195115
No one should be surprised if other Senate Democrats voice doubts that McConnell can follow through. Because his about to control his own chamber has been poor at best. Same with Ryan and the House. The last time the Senate voted in immigration, it just died in the house without even a floor debate.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
TheTenthDoc
Profile Blog Joined February 2011
United States9561 Posts
January 22 2018 19:14 GMT
#195116
On January 23 2018 03:25 ticklishmusic wrote:
And Nunes has his memo detailing wrongdoing at the FBI which he refuses to release.


He won't even release it the director of the FBI, apparently.
IyMoon
Profile Joined April 2016
United States1249 Posts
January 22 2018 19:15 GMT
#195117
On January 23 2018 04:14 TheTenthDoc wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 23 2018 03:25 ticklishmusic wrote:
And Nunes has his memo detailing wrongdoing at the FBI which he refuses to release.


He won't even release it the director of the FBI, apparently.


Because its nothing. This is just something so the crazies can get all riled up
Something witty
Introvert
Profile Joined April 2011
United States5082 Posts
January 22 2018 19:15 GMT
#195118
They support the same bill but a week shorter and with a pinky promise from McConnell. It's certainly not the activists on the dem side were demanding (See Harris, Kamala). Future circumstances can change but this looks like treading water at best for Democrats.
"But, as the conservative understands it, modification of the rules should always reflect, and never impose, a change in the activities and beliefs of those who are subject to them, and should never on any occasion be so great as to destroy the ensemble."
IyMoon
Profile Joined April 2016
United States1249 Posts
January 22 2018 19:16 GMT
#195119
On January 23 2018 04:15 Introvert wrote:
They support the same bill but a week shorter and with a pinky promise from McConnell. It's certainly not the activists on the dem side were demanding (See Harris, Kamala). Future circumstances can change but this looks like treading water at best for Democrats.


I think this is a great play for the long game. If the R can't keep their promises then the next shutdown in 3 weeks has a whole new reason behind it.
Something witty
Introvert
Profile Joined April 2011
United States5082 Posts
January 22 2018 19:16 GMT
#195120
On January 23 2018 04:15 IyMoon wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 23 2018 04:14 TheTenthDoc wrote:
On January 23 2018 03:25 ticklishmusic wrote:
And Nunes has his memo detailing wrongdoing at the FBI which he refuses to release.


He won't even release it the director of the FBI, apparently.


Because its nothing. This is just something so the crazies can get all riled up


I thought that at the very least the committee has to vote to release it. I can see why the Democrats would block the memo, but I think they are also blocking the whole thing.

I don't think Nunes can release it by himself.
"But, as the conservative understands it, modification of the rules should always reflect, and never impose, a change in the activities and beliefs of those who are subject to them, and should never on any occasion be so great as to destroy the ensemble."
Prev 1 9754 9755 9756 9757 9758 10093 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
OSC
23:00
King of the Hill #267
EmpressLilyy77
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
LamboSC2 319
SHIN 144
BRAT_OK 82
ByuN (SOOP) 33
EnDerr 6
StarCraft: Brood War
Jaedong 1635
Light 759
Mini 570
Soma 492
Stork 402
Soulkey 355
BeSt 301
actioN 295
ZerO 188
Snow 188
[ Show more ]
Hyuk 171
ggaemo 168
firebathero 158
hero 114
Mind 107
Hyun 106
Bonyth 97
Leta 97
Mong 94
Sharp 70
Zeus 67
Killer 39
Bale 38
Shinee 37
JYJ 33
sorry 25
Hm[arnc] 24
HiyA 23
Aegong 22
Shine 22
Sacsri 17
ajuk12(nOOB) 16
zelot 16
soO 14
Terrorterran 14
Bishop 12
scan(afreeca) 10
Dota 2
Dendi1088
monkeys_forever292
BananaSlamJamma224
League of Legends
Reynor118
Other Games
qojqva1685
Liquid`RaSZi1201
B2W.Neo872
Lowko502
syndereN294
Fuzer 264
XaKoH 174
Liquid`VortiX171
Mew2King118
ArmadaUGS101
QueenE84
NeuroSwarm40
Trikslyr34
Railgan23
Chillindude19
JuggernautJason11
ZerO(Twitch)11
Organizations
Counter-Strike
PGL287
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• StrangeGG 48
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Laughngamez YouTube
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• FirePhoenix6
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• WagamamaTV653
League of Legends
• Nemesis2099
• TFBlade766
Other Games
• Shiphtur555
Upcoming Events
IntoTheTV X SOOP
1d 18h
Reynor vs Solar
ByuN vs SHIN
Clem vs MaxPax
herO vs Rogue
IPSL
2 days
WorsT vs nOmaD
Dewalt vs andersOn
AI Arena Tournament
2 days
IntoTheTV X SOOP
2 days
IPSL
3 days
Azhi_Dahaki vs ggnore13
Double vs WIZARD
Replay Cast
3 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
WardiTV Invitational
4 days
YoungYakov vs Lambo
SHIN vs TBD
Percival vs Shameless
Solar vs TBD
PiGosaur Cup
5 days
[ Show More ]
The PondCast
6 days
KCM Race Survival
6 days
WardiTV Invitational
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-11-04
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
HCC Season 3

Ongoing

Acropolis #5
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 4
International ShieldBattery League
BSL Season 23
IPSL Winter 2026-27
Calamity Cup Div. A Season 8
IEM Beijing 2026
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 5
1win Private Club #2
Thunderpick World Champ. '26
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
1win Private Club #1
Logitech G Play Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #3
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026

Upcoming

1xBet Invitational
SC4ALL II: Brood War
BSL 23: Non-Korean Championship
HSC XXX
Stellar Fest 2: Lunar Cup
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
Underdog Cup 2026 Div 2-3
PGL Bucharest 2027
BLAST Bounty Winter 2027
eXTREMESLAND 2026
PGL Major Singapore 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 6
BLAST Rivals Fall 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.