• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 21:42
CET 03:42
KST 11:42
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 3 - Playoffs Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups C & D Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups A & B Preview2TL.net Map Contest #21: Winners12Intel X Team Liquid Seoul event: Showmatches and Meet the Pros10
Community News
RSL Season 3: RO16 results & RO8 bracket13Weekly Cups (Nov 10-16): Reynor, Solar lead Zerg surge2[TLMC] Fall/Winter 2025 Ladder Map Rotation14Weekly Cups (Nov 3-9): Clem Conquers in Canada4SC: Evo Complete - Ranked Ladder OPEN ALPHA16
StarCraft 2
General
SC: Evo Complete - Ranked Ladder OPEN ALPHA Weekly Cups (Nov 10-16): Reynor, Solar lead Zerg surge RSL Season 3: RO16 results & RO8 bracket RSL Season 3 - Playoffs Preview Mech is the composition that needs teleportation t
Tourneys
RSL Revival: Season 3 $5,000+ WardiTV 2025 Championship StarCraft Evolution League (SC Evo Biweekly) Constellation Cup - Main Event - Stellar Fest 2025 RSL Offline Finals Dates + Ticket Sales!
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 501 Price of Progress Mutation # 500 Fright night Mutation # 499 Chilling Adaptation Mutation # 498 Wheel of Misfortune|Cradle of Death
Brood War
General
Data analysis on 70 million replays 2v2 maps which are SC2 style with teams together? BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ soO on: FanTaSy's Potential Return to StarCraft A cwal.gg Extension - Easily keep track of anyone
Tourneys
[BSL21] RO16 Tie Breaker - Group B - Sun 21:00 CET [BSL21] RO16 Tie Breaker - Group A - Sat 21:00 CET [Megathread] Daily Proleagues Small VOD Thread 2.0
Strategy
Current Meta Game Theory for Starcraft How to stay on top of macro? PvZ map balance
Other Games
General Games
Path of Exile Nintendo Switch Thread Should offensive tower rushing be viable in RTS games? Clair Obscur - Expedition 33 Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The Games Industry And ATVI Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine About SC2SEA.COM
Fan Clubs
White-Ra Fan Club The herO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion! Anime Discussion Thread Korean Music Discussion
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2026 Football Thread NBA General Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023 TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
The Health Impact of Joining…
TrAiDoS
Dyadica Evangelium — Chapt…
Hildegard
Saturation point
Uldridge
DnB/metal remix FFO Mick Go…
ImbaTosS
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 2203 users

US Politics Mega-thread - Page 9756

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 9754 9755 9756 9757 9758 10093 Next
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.

In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up!

NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious.
Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action.
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
January 22 2018 18:29 GMT
#195101
On January 23 2018 03:25 ticklishmusic wrote:
And Nunes has his memo detailing wrongdoing at the FBI which he refuses to release.

"I have here in my hand a list of 205 . . . a list of names that were made known to the Secretary of State as being members of the Communist Party and who nevertheless are still working and shaping policy in the State Department. . . ."
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
Danglars
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States12133 Posts
January 22 2018 18:31 GMT
#195102
On January 23 2018 03:29 Mohdoo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 23 2018 03:26 Danglars wrote:
On January 23 2018 03:05 Toadesstern wrote:
i mean if it's a decent DACA bill it's easily a DEM win because they got everything they wanted. They just wanted the assurance that there will be a hearing and a bill for it.
Had they not hardlined on it there would not be a discussion scheduled for it in the first place, neither would there be a bill and if hell froze together and they somehow got it Trump would still veto it.

So claiming they got nothing is a bit silly. They got exactly what they wanted.
Now, wether or not it was worth will be seen after those 3 weeks. If the bill turns out a hot piece of garbage it will easily be a GOP win.


My state senator (and local 2020 heartthrob) thinks there wasn’t even a commitment made to go back on. It doesn’t square with people telling me they got exactly what they wanted. Otherwise, why go public.


In many ways, it doesn't matter if it was some kinda official guarantee. If democrats make such a clear gesture towards reaching an agreement, and things don't go well in 3 weeks, they can pretty much do whatever they want without being the bad guys. This is more of an optics thing, the fight happens again in 3 weeks. This just gives democrats more room to be obnoxious later.

I took her language to mean private commitment. As in, she doubts McConnell made any commitment to Schumer to later go back on. Nothing suggests official.
Great armies come from happy zealots, and happy zealots come from California!
TL+ Member
Mohdoo
Profile Joined August 2007
United States15725 Posts
January 22 2018 18:32 GMT
#195103
On January 23 2018 03:31 Danglars wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 23 2018 03:29 Mohdoo wrote:
On January 23 2018 03:26 Danglars wrote:
On January 23 2018 03:05 Toadesstern wrote:
i mean if it's a decent DACA bill it's easily a DEM win because they got everything they wanted. They just wanted the assurance that there will be a hearing and a bill for it.
Had they not hardlined on it there would not be a discussion scheduled for it in the first place, neither would there be a bill and if hell froze together and they somehow got it Trump would still veto it.

So claiming they got nothing is a bit silly. They got exactly what they wanted.
Now, wether or not it was worth will be seen after those 3 weeks. If the bill turns out a hot piece of garbage it will easily be a GOP win.

https://twitter.com/stevebruskcnn/status/955498423628726273
My state senator (and local 2020 heartthrob) thinks there wasn’t even a commitment made to go back on. It doesn’t square with people telling me they got exactly what they wanted. Otherwise, why go public.


In many ways, it doesn't matter if it was some kinda official guarantee. If democrats make such a clear gesture towards reaching an agreement, and things don't go well in 3 weeks, they can pretty much do whatever they want without being the bad guys. This is more of an optics thing, the fight happens again in 3 weeks. This just gives democrats more room to be obnoxious later.

I took her language to mean private commitment. As in, she doubts McConnell made any commitment to Schumer to later go back on. Nothing suggests official.


You're saying you think Schumer made up a conversation even thought it would be extremely easy for turtle to say he was lying? Is turtle saying it is a lie?
Logo
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States7542 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-01-22 18:33:34
January 22 2018 18:32 GMT
#195104
On January 23 2018 03:31 Danglars wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 23 2018 03:29 Mohdoo wrote:
On January 23 2018 03:26 Danglars wrote:
On January 23 2018 03:05 Toadesstern wrote:
i mean if it's a decent DACA bill it's easily a DEM win because they got everything they wanted. They just wanted the assurance that there will be a hearing and a bill for it.
Had they not hardlined on it there would not be a discussion scheduled for it in the first place, neither would there be a bill and if hell froze together and they somehow got it Trump would still veto it.

So claiming they got nothing is a bit silly. They got exactly what they wanted.
Now, wether or not it was worth will be seen after those 3 weeks. If the bill turns out a hot piece of garbage it will easily be a GOP win.

https://twitter.com/stevebruskcnn/status/955498423628726273
My state senator (and local 2020 heartthrob) thinks there wasn’t even a commitment made to go back on. It doesn’t square with people telling me they got exactly what they wanted. Otherwise, why go public.


In many ways, it doesn't matter if it was some kinda official guarantee. If democrats make such a clear gesture towards reaching an agreement, and things don't go well in 3 weeks, they can pretty much do whatever they want without being the bad guys. This is more of an optics thing, the fight happens again in 3 weeks. This just gives democrats more room to be obnoxious later.

I took her language to mean private commitment. As in, she doubts McConnell made any commitment to Schumer to later go back on. Nothing suggests official.



The comment to me seems more like a sarcastic/combative remark. Like she trusts McConnel so little that what he said doesn't register as a commitment, rather than McConnel didn't make it. But it's hard to say without hearing it and the context.
Logo
Mohdoo
Profile Joined August 2007
United States15725 Posts
January 22 2018 18:35 GMT
#195105
On January 23 2018 03:32 Logo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 23 2018 03:31 Danglars wrote:
On January 23 2018 03:29 Mohdoo wrote:
On January 23 2018 03:26 Danglars wrote:
On January 23 2018 03:05 Toadesstern wrote:
i mean if it's a decent DACA bill it's easily a DEM win because they got everything they wanted. They just wanted the assurance that there will be a hearing and a bill for it.
Had they not hardlined on it there would not be a discussion scheduled for it in the first place, neither would there be a bill and if hell froze together and they somehow got it Trump would still veto it.

So claiming they got nothing is a bit silly. They got exactly what they wanted.
Now, wether or not it was worth will be seen after those 3 weeks. If the bill turns out a hot piece of garbage it will easily be a GOP win.

https://twitter.com/stevebruskcnn/status/955498423628726273
My state senator (and local 2020 heartthrob) thinks there wasn’t even a commitment made to go back on. It doesn’t square with people telling me they got exactly what they wanted. Otherwise, why go public.


In many ways, it doesn't matter if it was some kinda official guarantee. If democrats make such a clear gesture towards reaching an agreement, and things don't go well in 3 weeks, they can pretty much do whatever they want without being the bad guys. This is more of an optics thing, the fight happens again in 3 weeks. This just gives democrats more room to be obnoxious later.

I took her language to mean private commitment. As in, she doubts McConnell made any commitment to Schumer to later go back on. Nothing suggests official.



The comment to me seems more like a sarcastic/combative remark. Like she trusts McConnel so little that what he said doesn't register as a commitment, rather than McConnel didn't make it. But it's hard to say without hearing it and the context.


"That's not an agreement. That's just hollow words and empty promises" sorta thing is how I took it.
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
January 22 2018 18:38 GMT
#195106
On January 23 2018 03:28 Danglars wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 23 2018 03:24 Plansix wrote:
The FBI agent and his texts throws a cloud over the investigation. But they fired the guy instantly and I don't think he was a lead on the investigation. But I fully expect the House Republicans to use this as a way to attack the investigation and the FBI. Especially when the investigation could lead to any congress member's campaign, because this isn't just about Trump.

On January 23 2018 03:24 Gahlo wrote:
On January 23 2018 02:52 Logo wrote:
On January 23 2018 02:46 farvacola wrote:
Turtle boy made the commitment publicly and in a manner he hasn't previously, so maybe there's reason to hope.


Didn't he do the same during the Tax bill to a few of the Republican holdouts?

What about the whole bump-stock thing?

-----

On another note, how is this CHIP extension being funded? Is it just a clean spending measure rather than the cut from medicare one? Is there anything else in this stopgap measure that's notable, but not headline worthy?

Congress has done nothing and a bunch of states(I believe it was somewhere in the mid teens) are trying to ban them at the state level.


Paul Ryan talked about debating it and then it died in the House. Because that man has no control over the floor or that chamber.

Mueller’s solid in there. Any firing and somebody else would resume.

This is about FBI rep and accusations of politicization without the DOJ. You don’t tell the FBI that six months of texts got disappeared, but they just told that to Congress. This will resonate.

The DOJ still oversees the FBI and this investigation. Losing those texts is not great, but I'm also confused why they couldn't get them again. Its not like there is only one copy in the world of those text exchanges. But beyond that, this one agent does not make the FBI suddenly more political. Having to investigate sitting elected officials made the FBI political because that is what always happens. Happened with Bill Clinton. Happened with Nixon.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
January 22 2018 18:42 GMT
#195107


Folks, 2018 is super weird. An NPR reporter just retweeted this and this guy works for the Federalist.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
Danglars
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States12133 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-01-22 18:47:47
January 22 2018 18:44 GMT
#195108
On January 23 2018 03:32 Mohdoo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 23 2018 03:31 Danglars wrote:
On January 23 2018 03:29 Mohdoo wrote:
On January 23 2018 03:26 Danglars wrote:
On January 23 2018 03:05 Toadesstern wrote:
i mean if it's a decent DACA bill it's easily a DEM win because they got everything they wanted. They just wanted the assurance that there will be a hearing and a bill for it.
Had they not hardlined on it there would not be a discussion scheduled for it in the first place, neither would there be a bill and if hell froze together and they somehow got it Trump would still veto it.

So claiming they got nothing is a bit silly. They got exactly what they wanted.
Now, wether or not it was worth will be seen after those 3 weeks. If the bill turns out a hot piece of garbage it will easily be a GOP win.

https://twitter.com/stevebruskcnn/status/955498423628726273
My state senator (and local 2020 heartthrob) thinks there wasn’t even a commitment made to go back on. It doesn’t square with people telling me they got exactly what they wanted. Otherwise, why go public.


In many ways, it doesn't matter if it was some kinda official guarantee. If democrats make such a clear gesture towards reaching an agreement, and things don't go well in 3 weeks, they can pretty much do whatever they want without being the bad guys. This is more of an optics thing, the fight happens again in 3 weeks. This just gives democrats more room to be obnoxious later.

I took her language to mean private commitment. As in, she doubts McConnell made any commitment to Schumer to later go back on. Nothing suggests official.


You're saying you think Schumer made up a conversation even thought it would be extremely easy for turtle to say he was lying? Is turtle saying it is a lie?

Right after ending the shutdown, you don’t want a prominent Senator expressing doubts that any deal was struck. If you’re the minority leader, this is a strike at your members confidence in you. Maybe you’re saying Harris is off her rocker? Should someone tell her how stupid she is to avoid embarrassment?
Great armies come from happy zealots, and happy zealots come from California!
TL+ Member
Danglars
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States12133 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-01-22 18:47:23
January 22 2018 18:46 GMT
#195109
On January 23 2018 03:42 Plansix wrote:
https://twitter.com/bdomenech/status/955510095043055616

Folks, 2018 is super weird. An NPR reporter just retweeted this and this guy works for the Federalist.

Well, the shutdown ended in three days and nothings on the record for what concessions Schumer got for the DACA bill (he has absolutely refused changes to chain migration and lottery). It’s very natural for some reporters to conclude Schumer took a licking now (but lives to fight another day with this short CR)
Great armies come from happy zealots, and happy zealots come from California!
TL+ Member
Mohdoo
Profile Joined August 2007
United States15725 Posts
January 22 2018 18:47 GMT
#195110
On January 23 2018 03:44 Danglars wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 23 2018 03:32 Mohdoo wrote:
On January 23 2018 03:31 Danglars wrote:
On January 23 2018 03:29 Mohdoo wrote:
On January 23 2018 03:26 Danglars wrote:
On January 23 2018 03:05 Toadesstern wrote:
i mean if it's a decent DACA bill it's easily a DEM win because they got everything they wanted. They just wanted the assurance that there will be a hearing and a bill for it.
Had they not hardlined on it there would not be a discussion scheduled for it in the first place, neither would there be a bill and if hell froze together and they somehow got it Trump would still veto it.

So claiming they got nothing is a bit silly. They got exactly what they wanted.
Now, wether or not it was worth will be seen after those 3 weeks. If the bill turns out a hot piece of garbage it will easily be a GOP win.

https://twitter.com/stevebruskcnn/status/955498423628726273
My state senator (and local 2020 heartthrob) thinks there wasn’t even a commitment made to go back on. It doesn’t square with people telling me they got exactly what they wanted. Otherwise, why go public.


In many ways, it doesn't matter if it was some kinda official guarantee. If democrats make such a clear gesture towards reaching an agreement, and things don't go well in 3 weeks, they can pretty much do whatever they want without being the bad guys. This is more of an optics thing, the fight happens again in 3 weeks. This just gives democrats more room to be obnoxious later.

I took her language to mean private commitment. As in, she doubts McConnell made any commitment to Schumer to later go back on. Nothing suggests official.


You're saying you think Schumer made up a conversation even thought it would be extremely easy for turtle to say he was lying? Is turtle saying it is a lie?

Right after ending the shutdown, you don’t want a prominent Senator expressing doubts that any deal was struck. If you’re the minority leader, this is a strike at your members confidence. Maybe you’re saying Harris is off her rocker? Should someone tell her how stupid she is to avoid embarrassment?


No, I think it is just posturing. Having a situation where Schumer barely has a grasp on his rowdy liberals is exactly the sort of "they're all crazy!" stuff somewhat-reasonable republicans have been doing as they negotiate various things. Having a restless, principled component is a good thing for democrats when it comes to negotiating in 3 weeks. They are going to be significantly less reasonable in 3 weeks and quotes like what you are describing will help.

Think of it like a tea party lite. That same kinda "yeehaw, enough al-uh-ready"
FueledUpAndReadyToGo
Profile Blog Joined March 2013
Netherlands30548 Posts
January 22 2018 18:50 GMT
#195111
On January 23 2018 03:42 Plansix wrote:
https://twitter.com/bdomenech/status/955510095043055616

Folks, 2018 is super weird. An NPR reporter just retweeted this and this guy works for the Federalist.

Wait who are the dragon eggs in this scenario
Neosteel Enthusiast
Mohdoo
Profile Joined August 2007
United States15725 Posts
January 22 2018 18:53 GMT
#195112
On January 23 2018 03:50 FueledUpAndReadyToGo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 23 2018 03:42 Plansix wrote:
https://twitter.com/bdomenech/status/955510095043055616

Folks, 2018 is super weird. An NPR reporter just retweeted this and this guy works for the Federalist.

Wait who are the dragon eggs in this scenario


Nuance of governance?
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-01-22 18:54:36
January 22 2018 18:54 GMT
#195113
On January 23 2018 03:46 Danglars wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 23 2018 03:42 Plansix wrote:
https://twitter.com/bdomenech/status/955510095043055616

Folks, 2018 is super weird. An NPR reporter just retweeted this and this guy works for the Federalist.

Well, the shutdown ended in three days and nothings on the record for what concessions Schumer got for the DACA bill (he has absolutely refused changes to chain migration and lottery). It’s very natural for some reporters to conclude Schumer took a licking now (but lives to fight another day with this short CR)

You are a deeply unfun person who totally missed the best part of that quote and the reason why I put it in the thread.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
brian
Profile Blog Joined August 2004
United States9633 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-01-22 19:08:42
January 22 2018 18:55 GMT
#195114
On January 23 2018 03:44 Danglars wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 23 2018 03:32 Mohdoo wrote:
On January 23 2018 03:31 Danglars wrote:
On January 23 2018 03:29 Mohdoo wrote:
On January 23 2018 03:26 Danglars wrote:
On January 23 2018 03:05 Toadesstern wrote:
i mean if it's a decent DACA bill it's easily a DEM win because they got everything they wanted. They just wanted the assurance that there will be a hearing and a bill for it.
Had they not hardlined on it there would not be a discussion scheduled for it in the first place, neither would there be a bill and if hell froze together and they somehow got it Trump would still veto it.

So claiming they got nothing is a bit silly. They got exactly what they wanted.
Now, wether or not it was worth will be seen after those 3 weeks. If the bill turns out a hot piece of garbage it will easily be a GOP win.

https://twitter.com/stevebruskcnn/status/955498423628726273
My state senator (and local 2020 heartthrob) thinks there wasn’t even a commitment made to go back on. It doesn’t square with people telling me they got exactly what they wanted. Otherwise, why go public.


In many ways, it doesn't matter if it was some kinda official guarantee. If democrats make such a clear gesture towards reaching an agreement, and things don't go well in 3 weeks, they can pretty much do whatever they want without being the bad guys. This is more of an optics thing, the fight happens again in 3 weeks. This just gives democrats more room to be obnoxious later.

I took her language to mean private commitment. As in, she doubts McConnell made any commitment to Schumer to later go back on. Nothing suggests official.


You're saying you think Schumer made up a conversation even thought it would be extremely easy for turtle to say he was lying? Is turtle saying it is a lie?

Right after ending the shutdown, you don’t want a prominent Senator expressing doubts that any deal was struck. If you’re the minority leader, this is a strike at your members confidence in you. Maybe you’re saying Harris is off her rocker? Should someone tell her how stupid she is to avoid embarrassment?


it seems to me like she just has no confidence in McConnell’s integrity, just as none of us do. though i agree it’s bad optics on a technical level, i don’t think there’s anything particularly scandalous about expressing your lack of confidence in a known shit heel.

granted none of us are senators, we’ve all come to that same conclusion. i’m leaving room to be pleasantly surprised at him keeping his word, but have a healthy skepticism. i too would say no deal was made until it’s voted on, because the fact is the senate has been, at best, inconsistent.

i would go a little further and say no side has any shutdown victory. instead Schumer has just given everyone a clean slate(or taken it depending on your perspective) and set up the GOP to either pass DACA legislation(win/win because everyone wants it right?) or take an even bigger loss in 3 weeks.
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
January 22 2018 19:01 GMT
#195115
No one should be surprised if other Senate Democrats voice doubts that McConnell can follow through. Because his about to control his own chamber has been poor at best. Same with Ryan and the House. The last time the Senate voted in immigration, it just died in the house without even a floor debate.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
TheTenthDoc
Profile Blog Joined February 2011
United States9561 Posts
January 22 2018 19:14 GMT
#195116
On January 23 2018 03:25 ticklishmusic wrote:
And Nunes has his memo detailing wrongdoing at the FBI which he refuses to release.


He won't even release it the director of the FBI, apparently.
IyMoon
Profile Joined April 2016
United States1249 Posts
January 22 2018 19:15 GMT
#195117
On January 23 2018 04:14 TheTenthDoc wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 23 2018 03:25 ticklishmusic wrote:
And Nunes has his memo detailing wrongdoing at the FBI which he refuses to release.


He won't even release it the director of the FBI, apparently.


Because its nothing. This is just something so the crazies can get all riled up
Something witty
Introvert
Profile Joined April 2011
United States4866 Posts
January 22 2018 19:15 GMT
#195118
They support the same bill but a week shorter and with a pinky promise from McConnell. It's certainly not the activists on the dem side were demanding (See Harris, Kamala). Future circumstances can change but this looks like treading water at best for Democrats.
"But, as the conservative understands it, modification of the rules should always reflect, and never impose, a change in the activities and beliefs of those who are subject to them, and should never on any occasion be so great as to destroy the ensemble."
IyMoon
Profile Joined April 2016
United States1249 Posts
January 22 2018 19:16 GMT
#195119
On January 23 2018 04:15 Introvert wrote:
They support the same bill but a week shorter and with a pinky promise from McConnell. It's certainly not the activists on the dem side were demanding (See Harris, Kamala). Future circumstances can change but this looks like treading water at best for Democrats.


I think this is a great play for the long game. If the R can't keep their promises then the next shutdown in 3 weeks has a whole new reason behind it.
Something witty
Introvert
Profile Joined April 2011
United States4866 Posts
January 22 2018 19:16 GMT
#195120
On January 23 2018 04:15 IyMoon wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 23 2018 04:14 TheTenthDoc wrote:
On January 23 2018 03:25 ticklishmusic wrote:
And Nunes has his memo detailing wrongdoing at the FBI which he refuses to release.


He won't even release it the director of the FBI, apparently.


Because its nothing. This is just something so the crazies can get all riled up


I thought that at the very least the committee has to vote to release it. I can see why the Democrats would block the memo, but I think they are also blocking the whole thing.

I don't think Nunes can release it by himself.
"But, as the conservative understands it, modification of the rules should always reflect, and never impose, a change in the activities and beliefs of those who are subject to them, and should never on any occasion be so great as to destroy the ensemble."
Prev 1 9754 9755 9756 9757 9758 10093 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
OSC
23:00
OSC Elite Rising Star #17
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nathanias 224
ProTech107
StarCraft: Brood War
Calm 3628
Shuttle 1153
Artosis 800
Snow 139
Noble 21
Dota 2
NeuroSwarm140
League of Legends
JimRising 717
Counter-Strike
taco 435
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor150
Other Games
summit1g17899
Maynarde118
ViBE14
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick909
StarCraft: Brood War
UltimateBattle 24
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Hupsaiya 103
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• Azhi_Dahaki8
• HerbMon 2
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Doublelift5130
Other Games
• Scarra1999
Upcoming Events
OSC
6h 18m
Wardi Open
9h 18m
Monday Night Weeklies
14h 18m
OSC
20h 18m
Wardi Open
1d 9h
Replay Cast
2 days
Wardi Open
2 days
Tenacious Turtle Tussle
2 days
The PondCast
3 days
Replay Cast
3 days
[ Show More ]
LAN Event
4 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Replay Cast
5 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
6 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

SOOP Univ League 2025
RSL Revival: Season 3
Eternal Conflict S1

Ongoing

C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 4
YSL S2
BSL Season 21
CSCL: Masked Kings S3
SLON Tour Season 2
META Madness #9
SL Budapest Major 2025
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2

Upcoming

BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
HSC XXVIII
RSL Offline Finals
WardiTV 2025
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026: Closed Qualifier
eXTREMESLAND 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.