• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 16:37
CEST 22:37
KST 05:37
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202551RSL Season 1 - Final Week9[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16
Community News
BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams6Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed19Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8Team TLMC #5 - Submission re-extension4
StarCraft 2
General
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 2025 RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings Jim claims he and Firefly were involved in match-fixing RSL Season 1 - Final Week
Tourneys
Esports World Cup 2025 Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2) Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava
Brood War
General
BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams BW General Discussion [Update] ShieldBattery: 2025 Redesign BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Ginuda's JaeDong Interview Series
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues CSL Xiamen International Invitational [CSLPRO] It's CSLAN Season! - Last Chance [BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread HOW TO RECOVER LOST OR STOLEN CRYPTOCURRENCY Post Pic of your Favorite Food! Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2025 Football Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 802 users

US Politics Mega-thread - Page 8506

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 8504 8505 8506 8507 8508 10093 Next
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.

In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up!

NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious.
Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action.
Uldridge
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
Belgium4764 Posts
August 20 2017 13:51 GMT
#170101
On August 20 2017 22:40 Schmobutzen wrote:
Any ideology adopted by a state has to be enforced. Not everyone in a state wants to live under that ideology. Problems and violence follows. This, garnered with the usual greed und stupidity, makes a bulk of the casualties of communist regimes. They all tend to habe very violent side effects. For that, I can't take them for a benevolent ideology.

I don't know who said it, but paraphrased it goes like this, Communism is great, but not for humans, only for ants.

This is why governments ultimately need to be abolished and a system needs to be in place that can work autonomously. Trying to figure out how tyranny will lay dormant is a key feature of this.
Taxes are for Terrans
Liquid`Drone
Profile Joined September 2002
Norway28665 Posts
August 20 2017 13:58 GMT
#170102
You really don't get to just split off the bad shit that happened under communistic regimes by calling them "stalinist" and "maoist". They're still communists, just shitty ones.

I find it baffling that so many people view communism, an ideology rather close to fascism, completely fine. Communism and Facism are almost exactly the same thing on different political spectrums.

By your measure it's actually entirely fine to be a fascist, as long as you make clear that you're "a mussolinist", not a "hitlerist".


I don't think it's entirely fine to be a fascist, but I think it's certainly much more fine to be a fascist than to be a nazi, and if someone tells you they are a fascist, I don't think it's fair to say 'oh, so you support killing jews, then'. This is not necessarily a part of fascism, but it is part of one particular implementation of fascism. A fascist does not have to own hitler's genocide, a communist does not have to own Stalin's various atrocities.

If you want to argue that a communist is like a fascist, that's actually entirely fair. But it's not like being a nazi - the communist equivalent of a nazi would be a stalinist or pol pothead.
Moderator
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-08-20 14:05:24
August 20 2017 14:01 GMT
#170103
On August 20 2017 22:51 Danglars wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 20 2017 22:22 Jockmcplop wrote:
On August 20 2017 21:49 Simberto wrote:
On August 20 2017 21:28 m4ini wrote:
On August 20 2017 21:23 farvacola wrote:
Though I feel like I plug her works all the time these days. I highly recommend Hannah Arendt's The Origins of Totalitarianism, particularly with regards to attempts at drawing equivalencies between neo-nazis and antifa.


Well, care to give a summary, because obviously no one's gonna go and buy a book now to argue.

No self-identifying communist thinks stalin was a swell guy, and the incredible numbers of death associated with communism are perceived as part of the horrible implementation, certainly not as part of the goal.


Bolded: you sure? Should not be possible to find one then, right?

Italic: yeah, ahm, it doesn't really matter what it's perceived as, what does matter is what happened in reality. There's really not much perception there, communistic regimes deliberately killed millions, too. If you choose to ignore that, okay, but let me ask you this, would you let that argument count for a Nazi, if he says "well holocaust was shit" or even (since we're talking perception) "well holocaust never happened anyway"? We both know you (actually, we) wouldn't. Except i don't give a pass to any side.


People who are communists today don't believe that stalinist atrocities didn't happen. They think that stalinist russia was not a communist nation. Their argument is that just because you call yourself something doesn't mean that you are that thing.

This can easily be proven, too. If we take a countries claim of how they work as absolute truth, then you would necessary have to attribute all of the North Korean atrocities to democracy. After all, they are the "Democratic peoples republic of Korea".

The resulting question is thus if something like stalinist russia is the inevitable result of striving for a communist society.

Now, i personally am not a communist, i fit in more within the social democrats. Thus, i think that the best-working economic system that we know of is one of capitalism with a lot of governmental controls and safety nets to protect the weaker members of society from the excesses of the strong. I also see that historically, communist countries have had a tendency to turn out pretty shitty. I don't know if that is attributable to communism, but i also don't really see why communism should get ever more chances. Frankly, communism is based entirely on an outdated 19th century theory of value.

I still dislike bad arguments.


Stalinist Russia was ideologically communist, they enacted communism pretty strictly.
I think the problem the modern day far left has with this is that they are unable to grasp the idea that their utopia could have extremely negative unintended consequences.
The consequences of nazism were completely intended.
I don't know if this makes one worse than the other, though, or which one would be worse.
Being smart and thoughtful can be as important as being well intentioned.

I think they heighten current societal problems so the "extremely negative unintended consequences" don't look to be much worse than issues now. It's gross negligence for societal health together with a misplaced belief that they can stop the slide if people take it too far. They didn't learn from 1960s radicals that are now professors and being attacked by their more regressive students.

If we had a time machine, I bet a bunch of 1960s radicals would rebel against their future selves.

On August 20 2017 21:48 m4ini wrote:


Problem being that i can't read e-books. If my local bookstore carries a copy, maybe, but e-books i just can't. I was a enthusiastic reader from childs age on, maybe that's why i despise e-book readers.

Physical books for life. E-ink is only good for news papers and essays.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States42652 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-08-20 15:43:30
August 20 2017 15:41 GMT
#170104
On August 20 2017 21:59 m4ini wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 20 2017 21:49 Simberto wrote:
On August 20 2017 21:28 m4ini wrote:
On August 20 2017 21:23 farvacola wrote:
Though I feel like I plug her works all the time these days. I highly recommend Hannah Arendt's The Origins of Totalitarianism, particularly with regards to attempts at drawing equivalencies between neo-nazis and antifa.


Well, care to give a summary, because obviously no one's gonna go and buy a book now to argue.

No self-identifying communist thinks stalin was a swell guy, and the incredible numbers of death associated with communism are perceived as part of the horrible implementation, certainly not as part of the goal.


Bolded: you sure? Should not be possible to find one then, right?

Italic: yeah, ahm, it doesn't really matter what it's perceived as, what does matter is what happened in reality. There's really not much perception there, communistic regimes deliberately killed millions, too. If you choose to ignore that, okay, but let me ask you this, would you let that argument count for a Nazi, if he says "well holocaust was shit" or even (since we're talking perception) "well holocaust never happened anyway"? We both know you (actually, we) wouldn't. Except i don't give a pass to any side.


People who are communists today don't believe that stalinist atrocities didn't happen. They think that stalinist russia was not a communist nation. Their argument is that just because you call yourself something doesn't mean that you are that thing.

This can easily be proven, too. If we take a countries claim of how they work as absolute truth, then you would necessary have to attribute all of the North Korean atrocities to democracy. After all, they are the "Democratic peoples republic of Korea".

The resulting question is thus if something like stalinist russia is the inevitable result of striving for a communist society.

Now, i personally am not a communist, i fit in more within the social democrats. Thus, i think that the best-working economic system that we know of is one of capitalism with a lot of governmental controls and safety nets to protect the weaker members of society from the excesses of the strong. I also see that historically, communist countries have had a tendency to turn out pretty shitty. I don't know if that is attributable to communism, but i also don't really see why communism should get ever more chances. Frankly, communism is based entirely on an outdated 19th century theory of value.

I still dislike bad arguments.


Except stalinist russia was indeed communist (with communist policies), where as you'll get no argument whatsoever anywhere by saying that north korea might not be that democratic (yeah..). If you look at the "endgoal" in terms of communism, and only go by that, sure. But that A: never happened, so the argument really doesn't count, and B: really doesn't get a pass in any discussion. It just wasn't the utopia people generally think off if they think "communism".

I'm in line with your political ideology, as a sidenote.

Show nested quote +
You thinking I mean a guy or two when I say quite a lot is on you. You not understanding my argument is also on you. Nazis support hitler. They own everything he did. Communists don't support Stalin. They don't own what he did.


You really don't get to just split off the bad shit that happened under communistic regimes by calling them "stalinist" and "maoist". They're still communists, just shitty ones.

I find it baffling that so many people view communism, an ideology rather close to fascism, completely fine. Communism and Facism are almost exactly the same thing on different political spectrums.

By your measure it's actually entirely fine to be a fascist, as long as you make clear that you're "a mussolinist", not a "hitlerist".

I'm not a communist but communism is meant to not have a state at all. Stalin's totalitarian regime very much did have a state which oppressed the fuck out of the people. That's not very communist. If you showed it to Marx and asked him "what political and economic system is this?" he would not have said communism. They made up their own ideologies as they went along.
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
farvacola
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
United States18825 Posts
August 20 2017 15:48 GMT
#170105
On the other hand, if you were to point at Nazi Germany while talking to Carl Schmitt, he'd clap his hands and smile widely
"when the Dead Kennedys found out they had skinhead fans, they literally wrote a song titled 'Nazi Punks Fuck Off'"
Nyxisto
Profile Joined August 2010
Germany6287 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-08-20 16:42:45
August 20 2017 16:40 GMT
#170106
On August 21 2017 00:41 KwarK wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 20 2017 21:59 m4ini wrote:
On August 20 2017 21:49 Simberto wrote:
On August 20 2017 21:28 m4ini wrote:
On August 20 2017 21:23 farvacola wrote:
Though I feel like I plug her works all the time these days. I highly recommend Hannah Arendt's The Origins of Totalitarianism, particularly with regards to attempts at drawing equivalencies between neo-nazis and antifa.


Well, care to give a summary, because obviously no one's gonna go and buy a book now to argue.

No self-identifying communist thinks stalin was a swell guy, and the incredible numbers of death associated with communism are perceived as part of the horrible implementation, certainly not as part of the goal.


Bolded: you sure? Should not be possible to find one then, right?

Italic: yeah, ahm, it doesn't really matter what it's perceived as, what does matter is what happened in reality. There's really not much perception there, communistic regimes deliberately killed millions, too. If you choose to ignore that, okay, but let me ask you this, would you let that argument count for a Nazi, if he says "well holocaust was shit" or even (since we're talking perception) "well holocaust never happened anyway"? We both know you (actually, we) wouldn't. Except i don't give a pass to any side.


People who are communists today don't believe that stalinist atrocities didn't happen. They think that stalinist russia was not a communist nation. Their argument is that just because you call yourself something doesn't mean that you are that thing.

This can easily be proven, too. If we take a countries claim of how they work as absolute truth, then you would necessary have to attribute all of the North Korean atrocities to democracy. After all, they are the "Democratic peoples republic of Korea".

The resulting question is thus if something like stalinist russia is the inevitable result of striving for a communist society.

Now, i personally am not a communist, i fit in more within the social democrats. Thus, i think that the best-working economic system that we know of is one of capitalism with a lot of governmental controls and safety nets to protect the weaker members of society from the excesses of the strong. I also see that historically, communist countries have had a tendency to turn out pretty shitty. I don't know if that is attributable to communism, but i also don't really see why communism should get ever more chances. Frankly, communism is based entirely on an outdated 19th century theory of value.

I still dislike bad arguments.


Except stalinist russia was indeed communist (with communist policies), where as you'll get no argument whatsoever anywhere by saying that north korea might not be that democratic (yeah..). If you look at the "endgoal" in terms of communism, and only go by that, sure. But that A: never happened, so the argument really doesn't count, and B: really doesn't get a pass in any discussion. It just wasn't the utopia people generally think off if they think "communism".

I'm in line with your political ideology, as a sidenote.

You thinking I mean a guy or two when I say quite a lot is on you. You not understanding my argument is also on you. Nazis support hitler. They own everything he did. Communists don't support Stalin. They don't own what he did.


You really don't get to just split off the bad shit that happened under communistic regimes by calling them "stalinist" and "maoist". They're still communists, just shitty ones.

I find it baffling that so many people view communism, an ideology rather close to fascism, completely fine. Communism and Facism are almost exactly the same thing on different political spectrums.

By your measure it's actually entirely fine to be a fascist, as long as you make clear that you're "a mussolinist", not a "hitlerist".

I'm not a communist but communism is meant to not have a state at all. Stalin's totalitarian regime very much did have a state which oppressed the fuck out of the people. That's not very communist. If you showed it to Marx and asked him "what political and economic system is this?" he would not have said communism. They made up their own ideologies as they went along.


Not to mention that the antifa isn't exactly big on authoritarianism and "tankies" are not exceptionally popular among them. Most nowadays seem to fall into some kind of Orwell / left-libertarian category

Where do you even find Marxist-Leninists these days?
Falling
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
Canada11349 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-08-20 16:58:49
August 20 2017 16:49 GMT
#170107
They think that stalinist russia was not a communist nation. Their argument is that just because you call yourself something doesn't mean that you are that thing.

Well, that's actually the problem. Communism has been tried. A lot. And not by fakes either- Lenin and Stalin were true believers. So were all the other leaders of the communist revolutions. And yet every time we end up with an oppressive dictatorship that kills millions of its people. I can't think of a single counter example of a communist revolution leading to anything other than a dictatorship. So it's been tried enough that I think we can conclude it's a bad idea, and not just a somewhat bad idea, but a murderously bad idea, a bad idea that leads to the gulags. It's been measured and found wanting. A communist who argues those regimes weren't real communism, mainly thinks they would do a better job if given a chance, and I don't trust that.

I've only read the first volume of the Gulag Archipelago, but it's been rather enlightening, seeing how far people go once you uproot and upend every so-called bourgesois system that was holding back human depravity through checks and balances. One thing the author kept comparing it to was that even the despotic and tyrannical Russian emperors were not so cruel... and in fact noted that even the Gestapo was still searching for truth when searching for traitors and spies- they actually released people because they had insufficient proof! The communists assumed guilt from the outset and so had nearly 100% accusation to conviction rate. Several Russians interrogated and released by the Gestapo, were then subsequently picked up, accused and convicted and sent to the gulags by the Bolksheviks. Fascinating stuff. But everywhere the biggest pattern was because it was revolution that brought down the entire system, human avarice and cruelty was unleashed everywhere. And then without any checks and balances, it was actually self-refuting: the commune farmer that was most on board with 'from each according to his ability, to each according to his need'- the ones most gung ho to work hard for the commune, were the first to get picked up for 'anticommunist behaviour' because they dared complain when corruption or incompetence led to five years of grain collection, but not a single bit of grain returning to the commune itself. But was that particular to Soviet Russia? By no means! Communism seeks to cut down every tree to get after the devil (the bourgesois), but in doing so leaves no protection for when the devil turns back on them. Its a revolutionary ideology that must do away with old system entirely. That is why it is an inherently murderous idea because in the process, it knocks out every limitation that would stop the murderer of accruing power and murder more (and the liar and the thief). We've seen this already, over and over. The data has come back; the great experiment is over; it works marvelously well to kill or imprison a lot of people and whatever benefit one gets out of it, is not worth the cost.


William Roper: So, now you give the Devil the benefit of law!

Sir Thomas More: Yes! What would you do? Cut a great road through the law to get after the Devil?

William Roper: Yes, I'd cut down every law in England to do that!

Sir Thomas More: Oh? And when the last law was down, and the Devil turned 'round on you, where would you hide, Roper, the laws all being flat? This country is planted thick with laws, from coast to coast, Man's laws, not God's! And if you cut them down, and you're just the man to do it, do you really think you could stand upright in the winds that would blow then? Yes, I'd give the Devil benefit of law, for my own safety's sake!
Moderator"In Trump We Trust," says the Golden Goat of Mars Lago. Have faith and believe! Trump moves in mysterious ways. Like the wind he blows where he pleases...
kollin
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United Kingdom8380 Posts
August 20 2017 16:56 GMT
#170108
Marxist-Leninism is different to Marxism, Stalinism is different to Marxism. No nation has followed the path Marx described as far as I'm aware, but from what I know Marx's economic theory is seriously flawed anyway so it is likely no nation can follow that path. Anarcho-communists are just as insane as Libertarians, the difference is only one of these political groups is taken seriously in the US.

Also fun fact Thomas More wrote what is seen as one of the first socialistic utopian doctrines with 'Utopia', and also burnt people on the stake for heresy. I'm sure he could have been a capable NKVD director.
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
August 20 2017 17:01 GMT
#170109
Yeah, a lot of people like to skip over the whole burning people in Thomas More's history. His resume is weird.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
LegalLord
Profile Blog Joined April 2013
United Kingdom13775 Posts
August 20 2017 17:03 GMT
#170110
"Communism" is a term used universally despite its very large breadth of possible meanings. What we had back in the USSR is different from what the "Marxists" of today study, is different from the Chinese communist party, is different from any other possible interpretation thereof. They are used together as a blanket dismissal of something with a negative connotation, but seldom with a real explanation of what the term is actually meant to mean.
History will sooner or later sweep the European Union away without mercy.
Falling
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
Canada11349 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-08-20 17:10:12
August 20 2017 17:03 GMT
#170111
@kollin
That's not from lack of trying. They collectivized the farms, the factories, etc.(Hell, it was a great excuse for guards to pilfer items from prisoners- we're all comrades now.) And then basically the slave trade where they would parade the women in naked, they pick out the best for themselves and the rest go off to the camps, while the men are also paraded in naked while the different camp bosses choose which are the healthiest they want to purchase. They tried to follow the path of Marxism, but reality is messier than ideology and theory and every time the path of Marxism has turned out to be a bloody and oppressive path. It happens so regularly and consistently that I don't see this as a bug, but a feature because it cannot stop the devil.

As for More, one can be correct on one front (or at least the movie version of More) while be absolutely incorrect elsewhere. But that section of the movie succinctly expresses a fundamental truth about what a system of laws does for society (I think.)
Moderator"In Trump We Trust," says the Golden Goat of Mars Lago. Have faith and believe! Trump moves in mysterious ways. Like the wind he blows where he pleases...
zlefin
Profile Blog Joined October 2012
United States7689 Posts
August 20 2017 17:08 GMT
#170112
weird thing about communism is it seems like all the places that tried it were peasant-agrarian societies, rather than the factory-based ones it was designed for. Also, how was this related to US politics? I'm pretty sure there was a relation, but I've been skimming and I don't remember it.
Great read: http://shorensteincenter.org/news-coverage-2016-general-election/ great book on democracy: http://press.princeton.edu/titles/10671.html zlefin is grumpier due to long term illness. Ignoring some users.
IgnE
Profile Joined November 2010
United States7681 Posts
August 20 2017 17:11 GMT
#170113
for all this talk about internet "echo chambers" and the unholy threat of societal fragmentation, it seems to me (continuing the metonymy of that great thomas more quote from above) that these communities are all pretty "flat" intellectual spaces.

people need to read more books and stop playing these bastardized enlightenment equivalence games, where stalinists are maoists are postmodern deconstructionists are alt right are nazis are the devil.
The unrealistic sound of these propositions is indicative, not of their utopian character, but of the strength of the forces which prevent their realization.
Falling
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
Canada11349 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-08-20 17:15:09
August 20 2017 17:11 GMT
#170114
@zlefin
It's an offshoot of antifa beliefs and whether they are an inherently violent organization, but it is going down a bit of a rabbit trail, I'll grant you.

? Igne, it's precisely from reading a book (Gulag Archipelago) that made me think of the applicability of that quote. Was it the wrong sort of book?
Moderator"In Trump We Trust," says the Golden Goat of Mars Lago. Have faith and believe! Trump moves in mysterious ways. Like the wind he blows where he pleases...
Uldridge
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
Belgium4764 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-08-20 17:19:37
August 20 2017 17:18 GMT
#170115
On August 21 2017 02:11 IgnE wrote:
for all this talk about internet "echo chambers" and the unholy threat of societal fragmentation, it seems to me (continuing the metonymy of that great thomas more quote from above) that these communities are all pretty "flat" intellectual spaces.

people need to read more books and stop playing these bastardized enlightenment equivalence games, where stalinists are maoists are postmodern deconstructionists are alt right are nazis are the devil.


Or they could read the wiki articles at the very least to get a basic gist of nuanced reality instead of plowing through thousands of pages of sec material only to be able to distill something that can be summarized in five minutes which will be dismissed anyway and never be talked about again.

@Falling: I think he was talking in general terms, not talking to you per se.
Taxes are for Terrans
KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States42652 Posts
August 20 2017 17:23 GMT
#170116
On August 21 2017 01:49 Falling wrote:
Show nested quote +
They think that stalinist russia was not a communist nation. Their argument is that just because you call yourself something doesn't mean that you are that thing.

Well, that's actually the problem. Communism has been tried. A lot. And not by fakes either- Lenin and Stalin were true believers. So were all the other leaders of the communist revolutions. And yet every time we end up with an oppressive dictatorship that kills millions of its people. I can't think of a single counter example of a communist revolution leading to anything other than a dictatorship. So it's been tried enough that I think we can conclude it's a bad idea, and not just a somewhat bad idea, but a murderously bad idea, a bad idea that leads to the gulags. It's been measured and found wanting. A communist who argues those regimes weren't real communism, mainly thinks they would do a better job if given a chance, and I don't trust that.

I've only read the first volume of the Gulag Archipelago, but it's been rather enlightening, seeing how far people go once you uproot and upend every so-called bourgesois system that was holding back human depravity through checks and balances. One thing the author kept comparing it to was that even the despotic and tyrannical Russian emperors were not so cruel... and in fact noted that even the Gestapo was still searching for truth when searching for traitors and spies- they actually released people because they had insufficient proof! The communists assumed guilt from the outset and so had nearly 100% accusation to conviction rate. Several Russians interrogated and released by the Gestapo, were then subsequently picked up, accused and convicted and sent to the gulags by the Bolksheviks. Fascinating stuff. But everywhere the biggest pattern was because it was revolution that brought down the entire system, human avarice and cruelty was unleashed everywhere. And then without any checks and balances, it was actually self-refuting: the commune farmer that was most on board with 'from each according to his ability, to each according to his need'- the ones most gung ho to work hard for the commune, were the first to get picked up for 'anticommunist behaviour' because they dared complain when corruption or incompetence led to five years of grain collection, but not a single bit of grain returning to the commune itself. But was that particular to Soviet Russia? By no means! Communism seeks to cut down every tree to get after the devil (the bourgesois), but in doing so leaves no protection for when the devil turns back on them. Its a revolutionary ideology that must do away with old system entirely. That is why it is an inherently murderous idea because in the process, it knocks out every limitation that would stop the murderer of accruing power and murder more (and the liar and the thief). We've seen this already, over and over. The data has come back; the great experiment is over; it works marvelously well to kill or imprison a lot of people and whatever benefit one gets out of it, is not worth the cost.

Show nested quote +

William Roper: So, now you give the Devil the benefit of law!

Sir Thomas More: Yes! What would you do? Cut a great road through the law to get after the Devil?

William Roper: Yes, I'd cut down every law in England to do that!

Sir Thomas More: Oh? And when the last law was down, and the Devil turned 'round on you, where would you hide, Roper, the laws all being flat? This country is planted thick with laws, from coast to coast, Man's laws, not God's! And if you cut them down, and you're just the man to do it, do you really think you could stand upright in the winds that would blow then? Yes, I'd give the Devil benefit of law, for my own safety's sake!

Neither Lenin nor Stalin, nor any other Bolshevik, were believers in ideological communism. That's what separated the Bolsheviks from the Mensheviks and other communist groups. Communists believe in a natural process of class warfare through which the working class will rise up, seize the means of production, and displace the capitalist class. A classless and egalitarian society would follow. Meanwhile Lenin, Stalin and the other Bolsheviks believed that a revolutionary vanguard would be required to replace the existing elites and enact state control of the means of production as a proxy for worker control. To put it simply, in Bolshevism the state is now the factory owner, in communism there is no concept of a factory owner.

Bolshevism is an abomination, but it's not communism. Lenin and Stalin were absolutely fakes. Marx spoke of history as being largely inevitable, he didn't advocate for a communist revolution, he thought it would happen whether he advocated for it or not. A true believer in communism would have known that if you have to force it, it's not time.
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States42652 Posts
August 20 2017 17:25 GMT
#170117
On August 21 2017 02:03 Falling wrote:
@kollin
That's not from lack of trying. They collectivized the farms, the factories, etc.(Hell, it was a great excuse for guards to pilfer items from prisoners- we're all comrades now.) And then basically the slave trade where they would parade the women in naked, they pick out the best for themselves and the rest go off to the camps, while the men are also paraded in naked while the different camp bosses choose which are the healthiest they want to purchase. They tried to follow the path of Marxism, but reality is messier than ideology and theory and every time the path of Marxism has turned out to be a bloody and oppressive path. It happens so regularly and consistently that I don't see this as a bug, but a feature because it cannot stop the devil.

As for More, one can be correct on one front (or at least the movie version of More) while be absolutely incorrect elsewhere. But that section of the movie succinctly expresses a fundamental truth about what a system of laws does for society (I think.)

Replacing a capitalist landowner with the state does not make a communist farm. To get a communist farm you need to abolish the concept of land ownership entirely and have people voluntarily work together on the land that belongs to everyone and no-one for the collective good.
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
Falling
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
Canada11349 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-08-20 17:41:03
August 20 2017 17:37 GMT
#170118
Well alright, so the the 'real' communists are passive deterministic observers- which still means anyone who is actively trying to cause communism is doing something fundamentally dangerous to society.

As for the second- as as I'm aware they started with the abolition of property and ended with the state run farm. That speaks more to the untenability of abolishing property rights than any lack of true belief. (But maybe I'm wrong on that front.)
Moderator"In Trump We Trust," says the Golden Goat of Mars Lago. Have faith and believe! Trump moves in mysterious ways. Like the wind he blows where he pleases...
LegalLord
Profile Blog Joined April 2013
United Kingdom13775 Posts
August 20 2017 17:38 GMT
#170119
Maybe instead of doing a "no true Scotsman" on communism we should try to analyze what "communism" means in context. It's become almost a catch-all term for any number of potential ideologies.
History will sooner or later sweep the European Union away without mercy.
Danglars
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States12133 Posts
August 20 2017 17:39 GMT
#170120
Great armies come from happy zealots, and happy zealots come from California!
TL+ Member
Prev 1 8504 8505 8506 8507 8508 10093 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 14h 23m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Hui .259
Nathanias 152
ForJumy 101
ProTech74
StarCraft: Brood War
ivOry 8
Dota 2
monkeys_forever274
Counter-Strike
Fnx 1436
Stewie2K1108
Foxcn226
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu572
Other Games
FrodaN3003
Gorgc2664
qojqva854
Dendi651
C9.Mang0164
Trikslyr80
Sick33
Organizations
Other Games
BasetradeTV38
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• musti20045 15
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• blackmanpl 19
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota21814
• WagamamaTV766
Other Games
• imaqtpie1526
• Shiphtur444
Upcoming Events
Esports World Cup
14h 23m
Serral vs Cure
Solar vs Classic
OSC
17h 23m
CranKy Ducklings
1d 13h
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
1d 17h
CSO Cup
1d 19h
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
1d 21h
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
FEL
2 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2 days
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
[ Show More ]
Online Event
4 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
5 days
The PondCast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Xiamen Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
CC Div. A S7
Underdog Cup #2
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #1
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #2
ASL Season 20
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
HCC Europe
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.