• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 15:45
CEST 21:45
KST 04:45
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Holy Diver5[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Rough Waters10[ASL22] Ro24 Preview: Siren's Call8[ASL22] Ro24 Preview: Summer's End9Serral wins HomeStory Cup 2915
Community News
Weekly Cups (Sep 7-12): SHIN, ByuN, MaxPax double down1StarCraft open world shooter announced at BlizzCon100Weekly Cups (Aug 30-Sep 7): herO thrives amid growing schism10Official StarCraft website teases new content ahead of BlizzCon?179Stellar Fest TWO the Moon (Dec 16-20)9
StarCraft 2
General
The Death of Cheese: From a Professional Cheeser SC4ALL II: StarCraft 2 Player Announcement 8/8 Yamato Cup Series StarCraft open world shooter announced at BlizzCon Blizzard Classic Cup @ BlizzCon 2026 - $100k prize pool
Tourneys
Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament RSL Revival: Season 6 - Qualifiers and Main Event RSL goes to London! 2026 Offline Finals Nov 21-22 SC2 AI Tournament 2026 Fall KSL Week #92
Strategy
[H] ZvP Mid-Late Game: Stalkers Collossi HT
Custom Maps
Nexus Wars 2021 GUIDE [M] (2) Industrial Park
External Content
Mutation # 543 Enhanced Defenses The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 542 The Ascended Mutation # 541 Binary Choice
Brood War
General
Bot on ladder New 3v3 BGH Ladder (and more) on ShieldBattery! Syncronization issues and can't find games Remastered crash fix suggestions BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/
Tourneys
[ASL22] Ro16 Group C [ASL22] Ro16 Group D [Megathread] Daily Proleagues The Casual Games of the Week Thread
Strategy
Replay Review Process - What do you do? Simple Questions, Simple Answers Odyssey Mineral Stack Saturation Game Theory for Starcraft
Other Games
General Games
Warcraft III: The Frozen Throne Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread EVE Corporation Diablo IV
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread Post Your Watch!
Fan Clubs
MarineLorD Fan Club The Creator Fan Club The ShoWTimE Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Diablo Animated Series on Netflix
Sports
Football (Soccer) Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List Northern Ireland Global Starcraft
Blogs
[meme] I finally understa…
LUCKY_NOOB
Virtual Romance, Real-Life C…
TrAiDoS
Regacy Esports:Our Goa…
regacyesports
Dreaming of BW patches (mod…
c3rberUs
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 11534 users

US Politics Mega-thread - Page 7772

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 7770 7771 7772 7773 7774 10093 Next
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.

In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up!

NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious.
Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action.
xDaunt
Profile Joined March 2010
United States17988 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-06-06 18:14:58
June 06 2017 18:14 GMT
#155421
On June 07 2017 03:13 Neneu wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 07 2017 03:02 xDaunt wrote:
Also, in case anyone missed this, Reality Winners seems like a real piece of work. Who the hell thought it would be a good idea to give this person any kind of security clearance?

EDIT: "Being white is terrorism" hahahaha


Infowars is reliable media? Which conspiracy theory is it now?

I don't see any reliability problems when Infowars is citing and linking to Reality Winners' own social media. I would have thought that y'all would immediately be able to see the difference. My disappointment never ceases.
KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States44289 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-06-06 18:20:30
June 06 2017 18:17 GMT
#155422
On June 07 2017 03:14 xDaunt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 07 2017 03:13 Neneu wrote:
On June 07 2017 03:02 xDaunt wrote:
Also, in case anyone missed this, Reality Winners seems like a real piece of work. Who the hell thought it would be a good idea to give this person any kind of security clearance?

EDIT: "Being white is terrorism" hahahaha


Infowars is reliable media? Which conspiracy theory is it now?

I don't see any reliability problems when Infowars is citing and linking to Reality Winners' own social media. I would have thought that y'all would immediately be able to see the difference. My disappointment never ceases.

You don't see the difference between "woman says "being white is terrorism"" and "woman says to third party "you should make a shirt that reads "being white is terrorism"""? Because infowars said the former and showed the latter. Which is exactly the kind of shit people shit on infowars for doing.
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States44289 Posts
June 06 2017 18:17 GMT
#155423
You know what, of course you don't, Nevermind.
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
Danglars
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States12133 Posts
June 06 2017 18:18 GMT
#155424
"Quoted in article" and "sourced from" always has a hard ride in this forum if the publishing website is hated or distrusted. It's actually a humorous juxtaposition with the trust of anonymous sources in some outlets versus named sources on the record in others.
Great armies come from happy zealots, and happy zealots come from California!
TL+ Member
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States24354 Posts
June 06 2017 18:18 GMT
#155425
On June 07 2017 03:14 xDaunt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 07 2017 03:13 Neneu wrote:
On June 07 2017 03:02 xDaunt wrote:
Also, in case anyone missed this, Reality Winners seems like a real piece of work. Who the hell thought it would be a good idea to give this person any kind of security clearance?

EDIT: "Being white is terrorism" hahahaha


Infowars is reliable media? Which conspiracy theory is it now?

I don't see any reliability problems when Infowars is citing and linking to Reality Winners' own social media. I would have thought that y'all would immediately be able to see the difference. My disappointment never ceases.


Sounds like it was well taken out of context though.

But there is truth to the idea that whiteness is complicit with white terrorists. I mean your very own lack of discussion on how these white men are being radicalized and turning to terrorists is indicative of your own complicity.
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
LegalLord
Profile Blog Joined April 2013
United States13779 Posts
June 06 2017 18:19 GMT
#155426
I perused just the twits myself. Those represent the kind of person who doesn't belong in intelligence.
History will sooner or later sweep the European Union away without mercy.
KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States44289 Posts
June 06 2017 18:22 GMT
#155427
On June 07 2017 03:18 Danglars wrote:
"Quoted in article" and "sourced from" always has a hard ride in this forum if the publishing website is hated or distrusted. It's actually a humorous juxtaposition with the trust of anonymous sources in some outlets versus named sources on the record in others.

Danglars. An anonymous source is an unknown value in terms of whether or not the content is true. Infowars is not. Infowars is a known value, the content is very rarely true. This isn't very complicated. An anonymous source has yet to establish any credibility. Infowars has destroyed any credibility it may have to the point that if infowars printed that grass is green I'd go look out a window just to check.
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States24354 Posts
June 06 2017 18:22 GMT
#155428
On June 07 2017 03:19 LegalLord wrote:
I perused just the twits myself. Those represent the kind of person who doesn't belong in intelligence.


That said, her incompetence regarding securing her own safety indicates she was likely there specifically because the military is so desperate for translators.

I checked their website and they happen to have an opening for her position right now.
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
xDaunt
Profile Joined March 2010
United States17988 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-06-06 18:24:02
June 06 2017 18:22 GMT
#155429
On June 07 2017 03:18 GreenHorizons wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 07 2017 03:14 xDaunt wrote:
On June 07 2017 03:13 Neneu wrote:
On June 07 2017 03:02 xDaunt wrote:
Also, in case anyone missed this, Reality Winners seems like a real piece of work. Who the hell thought it would be a good idea to give this person any kind of security clearance?

EDIT: "Being white is terrorism" hahahaha


Infowars is reliable media? Which conspiracy theory is it now?

I don't see any reliability problems when Infowars is citing and linking to Reality Winners' own social media. I would have thought that y'all would immediately be able to see the difference. My disappointment never ceases.


Sounds like it was well taken out of context though.

But there is truth to the idea that whiteness is complicit with white terrorists. I mean your very own lack of discussion on how these white men are being radicalized and turning to terrorists is indicative of your own complicity.

What was taken out of context? She told Kanye to go make a T-Shirt that says that "being white is terrorism." In light of all of the other shit that she tweeted, are we really going to pretend that she doesn't mean and believe precisely the obvious sentiment that is behind that phrase? You sure as shit wouldn't let a white person get away with telling someone to make a "being black is terrorism" T-Shirt --- and you would have no doubt what that white person meant if he also wore a white hood.
Grumbels
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
Netherlands7032 Posts
June 06 2017 18:24 GMT
#155430
On June 07 2017 03:05 Wulfey_LA wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 07 2017 02:53 xDaunt wrote:
On June 07 2017 02:46 Wulfey_LA wrote:
So the Intercept intentionally burned their source.

"When reporters at The Intercept approached the National Security Agency on June 1 to confirm a document that had been anonymously leaked to the publication in May, they handed over a copy of the document to the NSA to verify its authenticity. When they did so, the Intercept team inadvertently exposed its source because the copy showed fold marks that indicated it had been printed—and it included encoded watermarking that revealed exactly when it had been printed and on what printer."


There are two possible interpretations for those actions.
(1) Rank incompetence
(2) Intentional burning

However, (1) is not possible. The Intercept actually has professional and knowledgeable staff on hand to deal with leaked information. All it would take to defeat this kind of watermarking would be taking a picture of the leaked document, PDFing it, and slightly downgrading the quality, then sending a black and white print out of that downgraded document for confirmation. The Intercept sent a high quality copy (or possibly the original?) directly to the government for confirmation. That is straight up (2) Intentional burning. A plea of incompetence cannot be sustained here.

https://arstechnica.com/security/2017/06/how-a-few-yellow-dots-burned-the-intercepts-nsa-leaker/

EDIT: here are the guys the Intercept have on staff. No possible plea of incompetence with actual experts on the payroll.


I highly doubt that the Intercept intentionally burned a source. There's nothing to be gained by doing that. No, this is pure incompetence. As someone who litigates a lot of complicated negligence cases, I can tell you that people ignore and break internal rules, policies, and procedures all of the time. And sometimes they do it knowingly, which is often considered "willful and wanton" conduct.


Have you read a post by Glenn Greenwald in the last year? Greenwald is denier-in-chief of the existence of Russian Active measures and puts his best effort in playing the epistemological spin game. Any evidence of Russian Active measures goes against his day to day spin. This would be like FOX news putting out a definitive report on how their reporters fed Rod Wheeler the Seth Rich conspiracies.

Here is the Intercept's sorry comment on the matter. Until they explicitly plead that they are OpSec morons who have zero knowledge of how printers work, this was intentional.

https://theintercept.com/2017/06/06/statement-on-justice-department-allegations/?comments=1#comments

Here is a guy that works at the Intercept. No ignorance. All intent.
https://twitter.com/micahflee

This logic makes no sense, and just makes it seem like you have a vendetta against the Intercept you are bringing into this argument. Your personal feelings are not relevant here...

The Intercept is a serious news site with staff that is independent of Greenwald. What would The Intercept, as an organization, have to gain from outing a source in this way? By far the most obvious reasoning is that an intercept staff member was negligent with their protocol for dealing with leaked documents.
Well, now I tell you, I never seen good come o' goodness yet. Him as strikes first is my fancy; dead men don't bite; them's my views--amen, so be it.
KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States44289 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-06-06 18:32:38
June 06 2017 18:25 GMT
#155431
On June 07 2017 03:22 xDaunt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 07 2017 03:18 GreenHorizons wrote:
On June 07 2017 03:14 xDaunt wrote:
On June 07 2017 03:13 Neneu wrote:
On June 07 2017 03:02 xDaunt wrote:
Also, in case anyone missed this, Reality Winners seems like a real piece of work. Who the hell thought it would be a good idea to give this person any kind of security clearance?

EDIT: "Being white is terrorism" hahahaha


Infowars is reliable media? Which conspiracy theory is it now?

I don't see any reliability problems when Infowars is citing and linking to Reality Winners' own social media. I would have thought that y'all would immediately be able to see the difference. My disappointment never ceases.


Sounds like it was well taken out of context though.

But there is truth to the idea that whiteness is complicit with white terrorists. I mean your very own lack of discussion on how these white men are being radicalized and turning to terrorists is indicative of your own complicity.

What was taken out of context? She told Kanye to go make a T-Shirt that says that "being white is terrorism." In light of all of the other shit that she tweeted, are we really going to pretend that she doesn't mean and believe precisely the obvious sentiment that is behind that phrase? You sure as shit wouldn't let a white person get away with telling someone to make a "being black is terrorism" T-Shirt --- and you would have no doubt what that white person meant if he also wore a white hood.

If I were to tweet Donald Trump to make a shirt saying "being brown is terrorism" I'm pretty sure it would be clear from context that I was satirizing his previous statements and the right wing refusal to say the words "radical white terrorism". Only an idiot would assume that I literally meant that being brown does by itself make an individual a terrorist. Are you an idiot?
+ Show Spoiler [example] +
[image loading]
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
xDaunt
Profile Joined March 2010
United States17988 Posts
June 06 2017 18:26 GMT
#155432
On June 07 2017 03:18 Danglars wrote:
"Quoted in article" and "sourced from" always has a hard ride in this forum if the publishing website is hated or distrusted. It's actually a humorous juxtaposition with the trust of anonymous sources in some outlets versus named sources on the record in others.

The problem is that a chunk of the posters around here still aren't willing and/or able to critically read discrete articles for their own intrinsic reliability, and would rather lazily classify by publication. I've explained why this is stupid before, and it should be self-evident to everyone.
LegalLord
Profile Blog Joined April 2013
United States13779 Posts
June 06 2017 18:26 GMT
#155433
On June 07 2017 03:22 GreenHorizons wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 07 2017 03:19 LegalLord wrote:
I perused just the twits myself. Those represent the kind of person who doesn't belong in intelligence.


That said, her incompetence regarding securing her own safety indicates she was likely there specifically because the military is so desperate for translators.

I checked their website and they happen to have an opening for her position right now.

I must have missed it, what languages does she speak?

That the intelligence branch needs more translators is quite apparent, that much is true.
History will sooner or later sweep the European Union away without mercy.
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States24354 Posts
June 06 2017 18:26 GMT
#155434
On June 07 2017 03:22 xDaunt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 07 2017 03:18 GreenHorizons wrote:
On June 07 2017 03:14 xDaunt wrote:
On June 07 2017 03:13 Neneu wrote:
On June 07 2017 03:02 xDaunt wrote:
Also, in case anyone missed this, Reality Winners seems like a real piece of work. Who the hell thought it would be a good idea to give this person any kind of security clearance?

EDIT: "Being white is terrorism" hahahaha


Infowars is reliable media? Which conspiracy theory is it now?

I don't see any reliability problems when Infowars is citing and linking to Reality Winners' own social media. I would have thought that y'all would immediately be able to see the difference. My disappointment never ceases.


Sounds like it was well taken out of context though.

But there is truth to the idea that whiteness is complicit with white terrorists. I mean your very own lack of discussion on how these white men are being radicalized and turning to terrorists is indicative of your own complicity.

What was taken out of context? She told Kanye to go make a T-Shirt that says that "being white is terrorism." In light of all of the other shit that she tweeted, are we really going to pretend that she doesn't mean and believe precisely the obvious sentiment that is behind that phrase? You sure as shit wouldn't let a white person get away with telling someone to make a "being black is terrorism" T-Shirt --- and you would have no doubt what that white person meant if he also wore a white hood.


Generally when people suggest you put something on a T-Shirt they are being facetious. But "Being black is terrorism" has no basis, whereas "being white is terrorism" is a hyperbolic comment on a real issue.
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
a_flayer
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
Netherlands2826 Posts
June 06 2017 18:26 GMT
#155435
She protested against the electoral college on twitter. Sounds like a Russian agent to me.
When you came along so righteous with a new national hate, so convincing is the ardor of war and of men, it's harder to breathe than to believe you're a friend. The wars at home, the wars abroad, all soaked in blood and lies and fraud.
Karis Vas Ryaar
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
United States4396 Posts
June 06 2017 18:27 GMT
#155436
"I'm not agreeing with a lot of Virus's decisions but they are working" Tasteless. Ipl4 Losers Bracket Virus 2-1 Maru
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States24354 Posts
June 06 2017 18:28 GMT
#155437
On June 07 2017 03:26 LegalLord wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 07 2017 03:22 GreenHorizons wrote:
On June 07 2017 03:19 LegalLord wrote:
I perused just the twits myself. Those represent the kind of person who doesn't belong in intelligence.


That said, her incompetence regarding securing her own safety indicates she was likely there specifically because the military is so desperate for translators.

I checked their website and they happen to have an opening for her position right now.

I must have missed it, what languages does she speak?

That the intelligence branch needs more translators is quite apparent, that much is true.



Winner served as a linguist in the U.S. Air Force for six years and reportedly speaks three foreign languages fluently — Farsi, Dari, and Pashto.

Source
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
xDaunt
Profile Joined March 2010
United States17988 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-06-06 18:30:33
June 06 2017 18:29 GMT
#155438
On June 07 2017 03:26 GreenHorizons wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 07 2017 03:22 xDaunt wrote:
On June 07 2017 03:18 GreenHorizons wrote:
On June 07 2017 03:14 xDaunt wrote:
On June 07 2017 03:13 Neneu wrote:
On June 07 2017 03:02 xDaunt wrote:
Also, in case anyone missed this, Reality Winners seems like a real piece of work. Who the hell thought it would be a good idea to give this person any kind of security clearance?

EDIT: "Being white is terrorism" hahahaha


Infowars is reliable media? Which conspiracy theory is it now?

I don't see any reliability problems when Infowars is citing and linking to Reality Winners' own social media. I would have thought that y'all would immediately be able to see the difference. My disappointment never ceases.


Sounds like it was well taken out of context though.

But there is truth to the idea that whiteness is complicit with white terrorists. I mean your very own lack of discussion on how these white men are being radicalized and turning to terrorists is indicative of your own complicity.

What was taken out of context? She told Kanye to go make a T-Shirt that says that "being white is terrorism." In light of all of the other shit that she tweeted, are we really going to pretend that she doesn't mean and believe precisely the obvious sentiment that is behind that phrase? You sure as shit wouldn't let a white person get away with telling someone to make a "being black is terrorism" T-Shirt --- and you would have no doubt what that white person meant if he also wore a white hood.


Generally when people suggest you put something on a T-Shirt they are being facetious. But "Being black is terrorism" has no basis, whereas "being white is terrorism" is a hyperbolic comment on a real issue.

Yeah, try arguing that to all of the people who have their property destroyed whenever BLM get its vandalism on.
NewSunshine
Profile Joined July 2011
United States5938 Posts
June 06 2017 18:30 GMT
#155439
On June 07 2017 03:22 xDaunt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 07 2017 03:18 GreenHorizons wrote:
On June 07 2017 03:14 xDaunt wrote:
On June 07 2017 03:13 Neneu wrote:
On June 07 2017 03:02 xDaunt wrote:
Also, in case anyone missed this, Reality Winners seems like a real piece of work. Who the hell thought it would be a good idea to give this person any kind of security clearance?

EDIT: "Being white is terrorism" hahahaha


Infowars is reliable media? Which conspiracy theory is it now?

I don't see any reliability problems when Infowars is citing and linking to Reality Winners' own social media. I would have thought that y'all would immediately be able to see the difference. My disappointment never ceases.


Sounds like it was well taken out of context though.

But there is truth to the idea that whiteness is complicit with white terrorists. I mean your very own lack of discussion on how these white men are being radicalized and turning to terrorists is indicative of your own complicity.

What was taken out of context? She told Kanye to go make a T-Shirt that says that "being white is terrorism." In light of all of the other shit that she tweeted, are we really going to pretend that she doesn't mean and believe precisely the obvious sentiment that is behind that phrase? You sure as shit wouldn't let a white person get away with telling someone to make a "being black is terrorism" T-Shirt --- and you would have no doubt what that white person meant if he also wore a white hood.

You seem to care an awful lot more about Reality Winner's leak fumble, and apparently everything else she does in her free time, than about any concurrent stories. She made a move that was dumb, did it poorly, and is being punished, end of story.
"If you find yourself feeling lost, take pride in the accuracy of your feelings." - Night Vale
brian
Profile Blog Joined August 2004
United States9643 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-06-06 18:35:15
June 06 2017 18:31 GMT
#155440
On June 07 2017 03:22 xDaunt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 07 2017 03:18 GreenHorizons wrote:
On June 07 2017 03:14 xDaunt wrote:
On June 07 2017 03:13 Neneu wrote:
On June 07 2017 03:02 xDaunt wrote:
Also, in case anyone missed this, Reality Winners seems like a real piece of work. Who the hell thought it would be a good idea to give this person any kind of security clearance?

EDIT: "Being white is terrorism" hahahaha


Infowars is reliable media? Which conspiracy theory is it now?

I don't see any reliability problems when Infowars is citing and linking to Reality Winners' own social media. I would have thought that y'all would immediately be able to see the difference. My disappointment never ceases.


Sounds like it was well taken out of context though.

But there is truth to the idea that whiteness is complicit with white terrorists. I mean your very own lack of discussion on how these white men are being radicalized and turning to terrorists is indicative of your own complicity.

What was taken out of context? She told Kanye to go make a T-Shirt that says that "being white is terrorism." In light of all of the other shit that she tweeted, are we really going to pretend that she doesn't mean and believe precisely the obvious sentiment that is behind that phrase? You sure as shit wouldn't let a white person get away with telling someone to make a "being black is terrorism" T-Shirt --- and you would have no doubt what that white person meant if he also wore a white hood.


the sentiment obvious to everyone but you apparently is that she thinks kanye is a hyperbolic nutcase. how you ascribe this to her own beliefs on racism is the link everyone's missing man.

it's a pretty clear case of infowars deliberately misconstruing something. they did so fairly obviously by linking the source material, so i mean you can qualify the failure as 'misleading at best' if it makes a difference.

i mean to your own point we're arguing about the credibility of infowars, which i think by all measures is a waste of time. the source material is what's relevant. but if you're gonna misunderstand or misconstrue a tweet i guess it's on the table.
Prev 1 7770 7771 7772 7773 7774 10093 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
RotterdaM Event
16:15
Rotti's PatchesSC Open #4
RotterdaM914
IndyStarCraft 256
TKL 229
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
RotterdaM 914
ByuN 545
IndyStarCraft 256
TKL 229
EmSc Tv 18
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 20628
Shuttle 923
Dewaltoss 175
Sexy 48
Barracks 38
scan(afreeca) 36
Trap 14
Dota 2
BananaSlamJamma412
monkeys_forever100
League of Legends
Doublelift277
Counter-Strike
fl0m836
pashabiceps829
Heroes of the Storm
Grubby2952
Liquid`Hasu391
MindelVK18
Other Games
summit1g4660
FrodaN3014
hiko948
KnowMe359
B2W.Neo309
ToD172
C9.Mang0137
ArmadaUGS88
QueenE69
Trikslyr52
Livibee42
ZombieGrub34
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1463
StarCraft 2
EmSc Tv 18
EmSc2Tv 18
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Adnapsc2 13
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• blackmanpl 27
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 3781
Other Games
• imaqtpie701
• Scarra161
• Shiphtur116
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
4h 15m
GSL
15h 15m
AI Arena Tournament
21h 15m
Replay Cast
1d 4h
GSL
1d 15h
Shopify Rebellion Sundays
1d 19h
Spirit vs Mixu
Replay Cast
2 days
Afreeca Starleague
2 days
Shine vs Rush
WardiTV Weekly
2 days
Monday Night Weeklies
2 days
[ Show More ]
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
Afreeca Starleague
3 days
Light vs EffOrt
PiGosaur Cup
4 days
Kung Fu Cup
4 days
The PondCast
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 3
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
Big Dog Cup 2026 Div 1

Ongoing

K-JUNGMAN
ASL Season 22
Super Anchor Qualifying S3
CSL 2026 AUTUMN (S22)
Acropolis #5
Calamity Invitational
Logitech G Play Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #3
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual
Stake Ranked Episode 3
XSE Pro League 2026

Upcoming

Acropolis #5 - GSA
Acropolis #5 - GSB
Acropolis #5 - GSC
SC4ALL II: Brood War
HSC XXX
Stellar Fest 2: Lunar Cup
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
Copium Cup
PGL Major Singapore 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 6
BLAST Rivals Fall 2026
IEM Beijing 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 5
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
1win Private Club #2
Thunderpick World Champ. '26
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
1win Private Club #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.