|
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up! NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious. Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action. |
On June 07 2017 03:13 Neneu wrote:Infowars is reliable media? Which conspiracy theory is it now? I don't see any reliability problems when Infowars is citing and linking to Reality Winners' own social media. I would have thought that y'all would immediately be able to see the difference. My disappointment never ceases.
|
United States42024 Posts
On June 07 2017 03:14 xDaunt wrote:Show nested quote +On June 07 2017 03:13 Neneu wrote:On June 07 2017 03:02 xDaunt wrote:Also, in case anyone missed this, Reality Winners seems like a real piece of work. Who the hell thought it would be a good idea to give this person any kind of security clearance? EDIT: "Being white is terrorism" hahahaha Infowars is reliable media? Which conspiracy theory is it now? I don't see any reliability problems when Infowars is citing and linking to Reality Winners' own social media. I would have thought that y'all would immediately be able to see the difference. My disappointment never ceases. You don't see the difference between "woman says "being white is terrorism"" and "woman says to third party "you should make a shirt that reads "being white is terrorism"""? Because infowars said the former and showed the latter. Which is exactly the kind of shit people shit on infowars for doing.
|
United States42024 Posts
You know what, of course you don't, Nevermind.
|
"Quoted in article" and "sourced from" always has a hard ride in this forum if the publishing website is hated or distrusted. It's actually a humorous juxtaposition with the trust of anonymous sources in some outlets versus named sources on the record in others.
|
On June 07 2017 03:14 xDaunt wrote:Show nested quote +On June 07 2017 03:13 Neneu wrote:On June 07 2017 03:02 xDaunt wrote:Also, in case anyone missed this, Reality Winners seems like a real piece of work. Who the hell thought it would be a good idea to give this person any kind of security clearance? EDIT: "Being white is terrorism" hahahaha Infowars is reliable media? Which conspiracy theory is it now? I don't see any reliability problems when Infowars is citing and linking to Reality Winners' own social media. I would have thought that y'all would immediately be able to see the difference. My disappointment never ceases.
Sounds like it was well taken out of context though.
But there is truth to the idea that whiteness is complicit with white terrorists. I mean your very own lack of discussion on how these white men are being radicalized and turning to terrorists is indicative of your own complicity.
|
United Kingdom13775 Posts
I perused just the twits myself. Those represent the kind of person who doesn't belong in intelligence.
|
United States42024 Posts
On June 07 2017 03:18 Danglars wrote: "Quoted in article" and "sourced from" always has a hard ride in this forum if the publishing website is hated or distrusted. It's actually a humorous juxtaposition with the trust of anonymous sources in some outlets versus named sources on the record in others. Danglars. An anonymous source is an unknown value in terms of whether or not the content is true. Infowars is not. Infowars is a known value, the content is very rarely true. This isn't very complicated. An anonymous source has yet to establish any credibility. Infowars has destroyed any credibility it may have to the point that if infowars printed that grass is green I'd go look out a window just to check.
|
On June 07 2017 03:19 LegalLord wrote: I perused just the twits myself. Those represent the kind of person who doesn't belong in intelligence.
That said, her incompetence regarding securing her own safety indicates she was likely there specifically because the military is so desperate for translators.
I checked their website and they happen to have an opening for her position right now.
|
On June 07 2017 03:18 GreenHorizons wrote:Show nested quote +On June 07 2017 03:14 xDaunt wrote:On June 07 2017 03:13 Neneu wrote:On June 07 2017 03:02 xDaunt wrote:Also, in case anyone missed this, Reality Winners seems like a real piece of work. Who the hell thought it would be a good idea to give this person any kind of security clearance? EDIT: "Being white is terrorism" hahahaha Infowars is reliable media? Which conspiracy theory is it now? I don't see any reliability problems when Infowars is citing and linking to Reality Winners' own social media. I would have thought that y'all would immediately be able to see the difference. My disappointment never ceases. Sounds like it was well taken out of context though. But there is truth to the idea that whiteness is complicit with white terrorists. I mean your very own lack of discussion on how these white men are being radicalized and turning to terrorists is indicative of your own complicity. What was taken out of context? She told Kanye to go make a T-Shirt that says that "being white is terrorism." In light of all of the other shit that she tweeted, are we really going to pretend that she doesn't mean and believe precisely the obvious sentiment that is behind that phrase? You sure as shit wouldn't let a white person get away with telling someone to make a "being black is terrorism" T-Shirt --- and you would have no doubt what that white person meant if he also wore a white hood.
|
On June 07 2017 03:05 Wulfey_LA wrote:Show nested quote +On June 07 2017 02:53 xDaunt wrote:On June 07 2017 02:46 Wulfey_LA wrote:So the Intercept intentionally burned their source. "When reporters at The Intercept approached the National Security Agency on June 1 to confirm a document that had been anonymously leaked to the publication in May, they handed over a copy of the document to the NSA to verify its authenticity. When they did so, the Intercept team inadvertently exposed its source because the copy showed fold marks that indicated it had been printed—and it included encoded watermarking that revealed exactly when it had been printed and on what printer." There are two possible interpretations for those actions. (1) Rank incompetence (2) Intentional burning However, (1) is not possible. The Intercept actually has professional and knowledgeable staff on hand to deal with leaked information. All it would take to defeat this kind of watermarking would be taking a picture of the leaked document, PDFing it, and slightly downgrading the quality, then sending a black and white print out of that downgraded document for confirmation. The Intercept sent a high quality copy (or possibly the original?) directly to the government for confirmation. That is straight up (2) Intentional burning. A plea of incompetence cannot be sustained here. https://arstechnica.com/security/2017/06/how-a-few-yellow-dots-burned-the-intercepts-nsa-leaker/EDIT: here are the guys the Intercept have on staff. No possible plea of incompetence with actual experts on the payroll. I highly doubt that the Intercept intentionally burned a source. There's nothing to be gained by doing that. No, this is pure incompetence. As someone who litigates a lot of complicated negligence cases, I can tell you that people ignore and break internal rules, policies, and procedures all of the time. And sometimes they do it knowingly, which is often considered "willful and wanton" conduct. Have you read a post by Glenn Greenwald in the last year? Greenwald is denier-in-chief of the existence of Russian Active measures and puts his best effort in playing the epistemological spin game. Any evidence of Russian Active measures goes against his day to day spin. This would be like FOX news putting out a definitive report on how their reporters fed Rod Wheeler the Seth Rich conspiracies. Here is the Intercept's sorry comment on the matter. Until they explicitly plead that they are OpSec morons who have zero knowledge of how printers work, this was intentional. https://theintercept.com/2017/06/06/statement-on-justice-department-allegations/?comments=1#commentsHere is a guy that works at the Intercept. No ignorance. All intent. https://twitter.com/micahflee This logic makes no sense, and just makes it seem like you have a vendetta against the Intercept you are bringing into this argument. Your personal feelings are not relevant here...
The Intercept is a serious news site with staff that is independent of Greenwald. What would The Intercept, as an organization, have to gain from outing a source in this way? By far the most obvious reasoning is that an intercept staff member was negligent with their protocol for dealing with leaked documents.
|
United States42024 Posts
On June 07 2017 03:22 xDaunt wrote:Show nested quote +On June 07 2017 03:18 GreenHorizons wrote:On June 07 2017 03:14 xDaunt wrote:On June 07 2017 03:13 Neneu wrote:On June 07 2017 03:02 xDaunt wrote:Also, in case anyone missed this, Reality Winners seems like a real piece of work. Who the hell thought it would be a good idea to give this person any kind of security clearance? EDIT: "Being white is terrorism" hahahaha Infowars is reliable media? Which conspiracy theory is it now? I don't see any reliability problems when Infowars is citing and linking to Reality Winners' own social media. I would have thought that y'all would immediately be able to see the difference. My disappointment never ceases. Sounds like it was well taken out of context though. But there is truth to the idea that whiteness is complicit with white terrorists. I mean your very own lack of discussion on how these white men are being radicalized and turning to terrorists is indicative of your own complicity. What was taken out of context? She told Kanye to go make a T-Shirt that says that "being white is terrorism." In light of all of the other shit that she tweeted, are we really going to pretend that she doesn't mean and believe precisely the obvious sentiment that is behind that phrase? You sure as shit wouldn't let a white person get away with telling someone to make a "being black is terrorism" T-Shirt --- and you would have no doubt what that white person meant if he also wore a white hood. If I were to tweet Donald Trump to make a shirt saying "being brown is terrorism" I'm pretty sure it would be clear from context that I was satirizing his previous statements and the right wing refusal to say the words "radical white terrorism". Only an idiot would assume that I literally meant that being brown does by itself make an individual a terrorist. Are you an idiot? + Show Spoiler [example] +
|
On June 07 2017 03:18 Danglars wrote: "Quoted in article" and "sourced from" always has a hard ride in this forum if the publishing website is hated or distrusted. It's actually a humorous juxtaposition with the trust of anonymous sources in some outlets versus named sources on the record in others. The problem is that a chunk of the posters around here still aren't willing and/or able to critically read discrete articles for their own intrinsic reliability, and would rather lazily classify by publication. I've explained why this is stupid before, and it should be self-evident to everyone.
|
United Kingdom13775 Posts
On June 07 2017 03:22 GreenHorizons wrote:Show nested quote +On June 07 2017 03:19 LegalLord wrote: I perused just the twits myself. Those represent the kind of person who doesn't belong in intelligence. That said, her incompetence regarding securing her own safety indicates she was likely there specifically because the military is so desperate for translators. I checked their website and they happen to have an opening for her position right now. I must have missed it, what languages does she speak?
That the intelligence branch needs more translators is quite apparent, that much is true.
|
On June 07 2017 03:22 xDaunt wrote:Show nested quote +On June 07 2017 03:18 GreenHorizons wrote:On June 07 2017 03:14 xDaunt wrote:On June 07 2017 03:13 Neneu wrote:On June 07 2017 03:02 xDaunt wrote:Also, in case anyone missed this, Reality Winners seems like a real piece of work. Who the hell thought it would be a good idea to give this person any kind of security clearance? EDIT: "Being white is terrorism" hahahaha Infowars is reliable media? Which conspiracy theory is it now? I don't see any reliability problems when Infowars is citing and linking to Reality Winners' own social media. I would have thought that y'all would immediately be able to see the difference. My disappointment never ceases. Sounds like it was well taken out of context though. But there is truth to the idea that whiteness is complicit with white terrorists. I mean your very own lack of discussion on how these white men are being radicalized and turning to terrorists is indicative of your own complicity. What was taken out of context? She told Kanye to go make a T-Shirt that says that "being white is terrorism." In light of all of the other shit that she tweeted, are we really going to pretend that she doesn't mean and believe precisely the obvious sentiment that is behind that phrase? You sure as shit wouldn't let a white person get away with telling someone to make a "being black is terrorism" T-Shirt --- and you would have no doubt what that white person meant if he also wore a white hood.
Generally when people suggest you put something on a T-Shirt they are being facetious. But "Being black is terrorism" has no basis, whereas "being white is terrorism" is a hyperbolic comment on a real issue.
|
She protested against the electoral college on twitter. Sounds like a Russian agent to me.
|
|
On June 07 2017 03:26 LegalLord wrote:Show nested quote +On June 07 2017 03:22 GreenHorizons wrote:On June 07 2017 03:19 LegalLord wrote: I perused just the twits myself. Those represent the kind of person who doesn't belong in intelligence. That said, her incompetence regarding securing her own safety indicates she was likely there specifically because the military is so desperate for translators. I checked their website and they happen to have an opening for her position right now. I must have missed it, what languages does she speak? That the intelligence branch needs more translators is quite apparent, that much is true.
Winner served as a linguist in the U.S. Air Force for six years and reportedly speaks three foreign languages fluently — Farsi, Dari, and Pashto.
Source
|
On June 07 2017 03:26 GreenHorizons wrote:Show nested quote +On June 07 2017 03:22 xDaunt wrote:On June 07 2017 03:18 GreenHorizons wrote:On June 07 2017 03:14 xDaunt wrote:On June 07 2017 03:13 Neneu wrote:On June 07 2017 03:02 xDaunt wrote:Also, in case anyone missed this, Reality Winners seems like a real piece of work. Who the hell thought it would be a good idea to give this person any kind of security clearance? EDIT: "Being white is terrorism" hahahaha Infowars is reliable media? Which conspiracy theory is it now? I don't see any reliability problems when Infowars is citing and linking to Reality Winners' own social media. I would have thought that y'all would immediately be able to see the difference. My disappointment never ceases. Sounds like it was well taken out of context though. But there is truth to the idea that whiteness is complicit with white terrorists. I mean your very own lack of discussion on how these white men are being radicalized and turning to terrorists is indicative of your own complicity. What was taken out of context? She told Kanye to go make a T-Shirt that says that "being white is terrorism." In light of all of the other shit that she tweeted, are we really going to pretend that she doesn't mean and believe precisely the obvious sentiment that is behind that phrase? You sure as shit wouldn't let a white person get away with telling someone to make a "being black is terrorism" T-Shirt --- and you would have no doubt what that white person meant if he also wore a white hood. Generally when people suggest you put something on a T-Shirt they are being facetious. But "Being black is terrorism" has no basis, whereas "being white is terrorism" is a hyperbolic comment on a real issue. Yeah, try arguing that to all of the people who have their property destroyed whenever BLM get its vandalism on.
|
On June 07 2017 03:22 xDaunt wrote:Show nested quote +On June 07 2017 03:18 GreenHorizons wrote:On June 07 2017 03:14 xDaunt wrote:On June 07 2017 03:13 Neneu wrote:On June 07 2017 03:02 xDaunt wrote:Also, in case anyone missed this, Reality Winners seems like a real piece of work. Who the hell thought it would be a good idea to give this person any kind of security clearance? EDIT: "Being white is terrorism" hahahaha Infowars is reliable media? Which conspiracy theory is it now? I don't see any reliability problems when Infowars is citing and linking to Reality Winners' own social media. I would have thought that y'all would immediately be able to see the difference. My disappointment never ceases. Sounds like it was well taken out of context though. But there is truth to the idea that whiteness is complicit with white terrorists. I mean your very own lack of discussion on how these white men are being radicalized and turning to terrorists is indicative of your own complicity. What was taken out of context? She told Kanye to go make a T-Shirt that says that "being white is terrorism." In light of all of the other shit that she tweeted, are we really going to pretend that she doesn't mean and believe precisely the obvious sentiment that is behind that phrase? You sure as shit wouldn't let a white person get away with telling someone to make a "being black is terrorism" T-Shirt --- and you would have no doubt what that white person meant if he also wore a white hood. You seem to care an awful lot more about Reality Winner's leak fumble, and apparently everything else she does in her free time, than about any concurrent stories. She made a move that was dumb, did it poorly, and is being punished, end of story.
|
On June 07 2017 03:22 xDaunt wrote:Show nested quote +On June 07 2017 03:18 GreenHorizons wrote:On June 07 2017 03:14 xDaunt wrote:On June 07 2017 03:13 Neneu wrote:On June 07 2017 03:02 xDaunt wrote:Also, in case anyone missed this, Reality Winners seems like a real piece of work. Who the hell thought it would be a good idea to give this person any kind of security clearance? EDIT: "Being white is terrorism" hahahaha Infowars is reliable media? Which conspiracy theory is it now? I don't see any reliability problems when Infowars is citing and linking to Reality Winners' own social media. I would have thought that y'all would immediately be able to see the difference. My disappointment never ceases. Sounds like it was well taken out of context though. But there is truth to the idea that whiteness is complicit with white terrorists. I mean your very own lack of discussion on how these white men are being radicalized and turning to terrorists is indicative of your own complicity. What was taken out of context? She told Kanye to go make a T-Shirt that says that "being white is terrorism." In light of all of the other shit that she tweeted, are we really going to pretend that she doesn't mean and believe precisely the obvious sentiment that is behind that phrase? You sure as shit wouldn't let a white person get away with telling someone to make a "being black is terrorism" T-Shirt --- and you would have no doubt what that white person meant if he also wore a white hood.
the sentiment obvious to everyone but you apparently is that she thinks kanye is a hyperbolic nutcase. how you ascribe this to her own beliefs on racism is the link everyone's missing man.
it's a pretty clear case of infowars deliberately misconstruing something. they did so fairly obviously by linking the source material, so i mean you can qualify the failure as 'misleading at best' if it makes a difference.
i mean to your own point we're arguing about the credibility of infowars, which i think by all measures is a waste of time. the source material is what's relevant. but if you're gonna misunderstand or misconstrue a tweet i guess it's on the table.
|
|
|
|