• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 04:07
CET 10:07
KST 18:07
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL22] Finals Preview: Sweet Victory!12[ASL22] Ro4 Preview: Mirror Mirror6[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: Within Reach5[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: In A Tizzy11[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Holy Diver5
Community News
Weekly Cups (Oct 26 - Nov 1): MaxPax, herO, Solar win0Weekly Cups (October 19-25): Clem triples first in 5.0.175Evil Geniuses - shutting down23ISSL (IntoTheTV x SOOP SC2 League): Premier7Weekly Cups (October 12-18): 5.0.17 era begins1
StarCraft 2
General
No more SC2 streamers on team liquid? StarCraft open world shooter announced at BlizzCon [D] Hacker peak in sc2 ? Liquibets sc2 season 30 Evil Geniuses - shutting down
Tourneys
SC4ALL: II Venue Change Announcement! Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament WardiTV Mondays ISSL (IntoTheTV x SOOP SC2 League): Premier Stellar Fest TWO the Moon (Dec 16-20)
Strategy
[H] ZvP Mid-Late Game: Stalkers Collossi HT
Custom Maps
[G] How to playtest arcade maps Starcraft 2 Advance [D] the control group Simple Questions/Answers
External Content
Mutation # 550 Graveyard Shift The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 549 Endless Sparkles Mutation # 548 Shining Bright
Brood War
General
Rollback Netcode in Brood War List of top players active on ShieldBattery [Megathread] Daily Funny Videos BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BW General Discussion
Tourneys
[$1250] International ShieldBattery League [Megathread] Daily Proleagues Small VOD Thread 2.0 KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 4
Strategy
50,000-Word Terran Builds Memo 2026-10-22 Cliff Jump Revisited (1 in a 1000 strategy) Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Path of Exile Stratus: Battle for the sky now on steam Early acc Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Deus Ex 3!?
Dota 2
Dota 2 Champions League Season 3 Begins April 25!
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Trading/Investing Thread Dating: How's your luck?
Fan Clubs
Fan Club Resource Thread Reynor Fan Club The Flash Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece
Sports
Football (Soccer) Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
Why I built Repalyzer (1.1.…
BlueStar
Innovate or Game Over?
TrAiDoS
ShieldBattery on Mac
Kraekkling
[ASL22] Ro4 Day1 Ticket Giv…
bITt.mAN
Can Bots Beat Pros?? Starcr…
namkraft
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 7861 users

US Politics Mega-thread - Page 7772

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 7770 7771 7772 7773 7774 10093 Next
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.

In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up!

NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious.
Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action.
xDaunt
Profile Joined March 2010
United States17988 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-06-06 18:14:58
June 06 2017 18:14 GMT
#155421
On June 07 2017 03:13 Neneu wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 07 2017 03:02 xDaunt wrote:
Also, in case anyone missed this, Reality Winners seems like a real piece of work. Who the hell thought it would be a good idea to give this person any kind of security clearance?

EDIT: "Being white is terrorism" hahahaha


Infowars is reliable media? Which conspiracy theory is it now?

I don't see any reliability problems when Infowars is citing and linking to Reality Winners' own social media. I would have thought that y'all would immediately be able to see the difference. My disappointment never ceases.
KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States44439 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-06-06 18:20:30
June 06 2017 18:17 GMT
#155422
On June 07 2017 03:14 xDaunt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 07 2017 03:13 Neneu wrote:
On June 07 2017 03:02 xDaunt wrote:
Also, in case anyone missed this, Reality Winners seems like a real piece of work. Who the hell thought it would be a good idea to give this person any kind of security clearance?

EDIT: "Being white is terrorism" hahahaha


Infowars is reliable media? Which conspiracy theory is it now?

I don't see any reliability problems when Infowars is citing and linking to Reality Winners' own social media. I would have thought that y'all would immediately be able to see the difference. My disappointment never ceases.

You don't see the difference between "woman says "being white is terrorism"" and "woman says to third party "you should make a shirt that reads "being white is terrorism"""? Because infowars said the former and showed the latter. Which is exactly the kind of shit people shit on infowars for doing.
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States44439 Posts
June 06 2017 18:17 GMT
#155423
You know what, of course you don't, Nevermind.
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
Danglars
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States12133 Posts
June 06 2017 18:18 GMT
#155424
"Quoted in article" and "sourced from" always has a hard ride in this forum if the publishing website is hated or distrusted. It's actually a humorous juxtaposition with the trust of anonymous sources in some outlets versus named sources on the record in others.
Great armies come from happy zealots, and happy zealots come from California!
TL+ Member
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States24505 Posts
June 06 2017 18:18 GMT
#155425
On June 07 2017 03:14 xDaunt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 07 2017 03:13 Neneu wrote:
On June 07 2017 03:02 xDaunt wrote:
Also, in case anyone missed this, Reality Winners seems like a real piece of work. Who the hell thought it would be a good idea to give this person any kind of security clearance?

EDIT: "Being white is terrorism" hahahaha


Infowars is reliable media? Which conspiracy theory is it now?

I don't see any reliability problems when Infowars is citing and linking to Reality Winners' own social media. I would have thought that y'all would immediately be able to see the difference. My disappointment never ceases.


Sounds like it was well taken out of context though.

But there is truth to the idea that whiteness is complicit with white terrorists. I mean your very own lack of discussion on how these white men are being radicalized and turning to terrorists is indicative of your own complicity.
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
LegalLord
Profile Blog Joined April 2013
United States13779 Posts
June 06 2017 18:19 GMT
#155426
I perused just the twits myself. Those represent the kind of person who doesn't belong in intelligence.
History will sooner or later sweep the European Union away without mercy.
KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States44439 Posts
June 06 2017 18:22 GMT
#155427
On June 07 2017 03:18 Danglars wrote:
"Quoted in article" and "sourced from" always has a hard ride in this forum if the publishing website is hated or distrusted. It's actually a humorous juxtaposition with the trust of anonymous sources in some outlets versus named sources on the record in others.

Danglars. An anonymous source is an unknown value in terms of whether or not the content is true. Infowars is not. Infowars is a known value, the content is very rarely true. This isn't very complicated. An anonymous source has yet to establish any credibility. Infowars has destroyed any credibility it may have to the point that if infowars printed that grass is green I'd go look out a window just to check.
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States24505 Posts
June 06 2017 18:22 GMT
#155428
On June 07 2017 03:19 LegalLord wrote:
I perused just the twits myself. Those represent the kind of person who doesn't belong in intelligence.


That said, her incompetence regarding securing her own safety indicates she was likely there specifically because the military is so desperate for translators.

I checked their website and they happen to have an opening for her position right now.
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
xDaunt
Profile Joined March 2010
United States17988 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-06-06 18:24:02
June 06 2017 18:22 GMT
#155429
On June 07 2017 03:18 GreenHorizons wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 07 2017 03:14 xDaunt wrote:
On June 07 2017 03:13 Neneu wrote:
On June 07 2017 03:02 xDaunt wrote:
Also, in case anyone missed this, Reality Winners seems like a real piece of work. Who the hell thought it would be a good idea to give this person any kind of security clearance?

EDIT: "Being white is terrorism" hahahaha


Infowars is reliable media? Which conspiracy theory is it now?

I don't see any reliability problems when Infowars is citing and linking to Reality Winners' own social media. I would have thought that y'all would immediately be able to see the difference. My disappointment never ceases.


Sounds like it was well taken out of context though.

But there is truth to the idea that whiteness is complicit with white terrorists. I mean your very own lack of discussion on how these white men are being radicalized and turning to terrorists is indicative of your own complicity.

What was taken out of context? She told Kanye to go make a T-Shirt that says that "being white is terrorism." In light of all of the other shit that she tweeted, are we really going to pretend that she doesn't mean and believe precisely the obvious sentiment that is behind that phrase? You sure as shit wouldn't let a white person get away with telling someone to make a "being black is terrorism" T-Shirt --- and you would have no doubt what that white person meant if he also wore a white hood.
Grumbels
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
Netherlands7032 Posts
June 06 2017 18:24 GMT
#155430
On June 07 2017 03:05 Wulfey_LA wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 07 2017 02:53 xDaunt wrote:
On June 07 2017 02:46 Wulfey_LA wrote:
So the Intercept intentionally burned their source.

"When reporters at The Intercept approached the National Security Agency on June 1 to confirm a document that had been anonymously leaked to the publication in May, they handed over a copy of the document to the NSA to verify its authenticity. When they did so, the Intercept team inadvertently exposed its source because the copy showed fold marks that indicated it had been printed—and it included encoded watermarking that revealed exactly when it had been printed and on what printer."


There are two possible interpretations for those actions.
(1) Rank incompetence
(2) Intentional burning

However, (1) is not possible. The Intercept actually has professional and knowledgeable staff on hand to deal with leaked information. All it would take to defeat this kind of watermarking would be taking a picture of the leaked document, PDFing it, and slightly downgrading the quality, then sending a black and white print out of that downgraded document for confirmation. The Intercept sent a high quality copy (or possibly the original?) directly to the government for confirmation. That is straight up (2) Intentional burning. A plea of incompetence cannot be sustained here.

https://arstechnica.com/security/2017/06/how-a-few-yellow-dots-burned-the-intercepts-nsa-leaker/

EDIT: here are the guys the Intercept have on staff. No possible plea of incompetence with actual experts on the payroll.


I highly doubt that the Intercept intentionally burned a source. There's nothing to be gained by doing that. No, this is pure incompetence. As someone who litigates a lot of complicated negligence cases, I can tell you that people ignore and break internal rules, policies, and procedures all of the time. And sometimes they do it knowingly, which is often considered "willful and wanton" conduct.


Have you read a post by Glenn Greenwald in the last year? Greenwald is denier-in-chief of the existence of Russian Active measures and puts his best effort in playing the epistemological spin game. Any evidence of Russian Active measures goes against his day to day spin. This would be like FOX news putting out a definitive report on how their reporters fed Rod Wheeler the Seth Rich conspiracies.

Here is the Intercept's sorry comment on the matter. Until they explicitly plead that they are OpSec morons who have zero knowledge of how printers work, this was intentional.

https://theintercept.com/2017/06/06/statement-on-justice-department-allegations/?comments=1#comments

Here is a guy that works at the Intercept. No ignorance. All intent.
https://twitter.com/micahflee

This logic makes no sense, and just makes it seem like you have a vendetta against the Intercept you are bringing into this argument. Your personal feelings are not relevant here...

The Intercept is a serious news site with staff that is independent of Greenwald. What would The Intercept, as an organization, have to gain from outing a source in this way? By far the most obvious reasoning is that an intercept staff member was negligent with their protocol for dealing with leaked documents.
Well, now I tell you, I never seen good come o' goodness yet. Him as strikes first is my fancy; dead men don't bite; them's my views--amen, so be it.
KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States44439 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-06-06 18:32:38
June 06 2017 18:25 GMT
#155431
On June 07 2017 03:22 xDaunt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 07 2017 03:18 GreenHorizons wrote:
On June 07 2017 03:14 xDaunt wrote:
On June 07 2017 03:13 Neneu wrote:
On June 07 2017 03:02 xDaunt wrote:
Also, in case anyone missed this, Reality Winners seems like a real piece of work. Who the hell thought it would be a good idea to give this person any kind of security clearance?

EDIT: "Being white is terrorism" hahahaha


Infowars is reliable media? Which conspiracy theory is it now?

I don't see any reliability problems when Infowars is citing and linking to Reality Winners' own social media. I would have thought that y'all would immediately be able to see the difference. My disappointment never ceases.


Sounds like it was well taken out of context though.

But there is truth to the idea that whiteness is complicit with white terrorists. I mean your very own lack of discussion on how these white men are being radicalized and turning to terrorists is indicative of your own complicity.

What was taken out of context? She told Kanye to go make a T-Shirt that says that "being white is terrorism." In light of all of the other shit that she tweeted, are we really going to pretend that she doesn't mean and believe precisely the obvious sentiment that is behind that phrase? You sure as shit wouldn't let a white person get away with telling someone to make a "being black is terrorism" T-Shirt --- and you would have no doubt what that white person meant if he also wore a white hood.

If I were to tweet Donald Trump to make a shirt saying "being brown is terrorism" I'm pretty sure it would be clear from context that I was satirizing his previous statements and the right wing refusal to say the words "radical white terrorism". Only an idiot would assume that I literally meant that being brown does by itself make an individual a terrorist. Are you an idiot?
+ Show Spoiler [example] +
[image loading]
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
xDaunt
Profile Joined March 2010
United States17988 Posts
June 06 2017 18:26 GMT
#155432
On June 07 2017 03:18 Danglars wrote:
"Quoted in article" and "sourced from" always has a hard ride in this forum if the publishing website is hated or distrusted. It's actually a humorous juxtaposition with the trust of anonymous sources in some outlets versus named sources on the record in others.

The problem is that a chunk of the posters around here still aren't willing and/or able to critically read discrete articles for their own intrinsic reliability, and would rather lazily classify by publication. I've explained why this is stupid before, and it should be self-evident to everyone.
LegalLord
Profile Blog Joined April 2013
United States13779 Posts
June 06 2017 18:26 GMT
#155433
On June 07 2017 03:22 GreenHorizons wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 07 2017 03:19 LegalLord wrote:
I perused just the twits myself. Those represent the kind of person who doesn't belong in intelligence.


That said, her incompetence regarding securing her own safety indicates she was likely there specifically because the military is so desperate for translators.

I checked their website and they happen to have an opening for her position right now.

I must have missed it, what languages does she speak?

That the intelligence branch needs more translators is quite apparent, that much is true.
History will sooner or later sweep the European Union away without mercy.
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States24505 Posts
June 06 2017 18:26 GMT
#155434
On June 07 2017 03:22 xDaunt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 07 2017 03:18 GreenHorizons wrote:
On June 07 2017 03:14 xDaunt wrote:
On June 07 2017 03:13 Neneu wrote:
On June 07 2017 03:02 xDaunt wrote:
Also, in case anyone missed this, Reality Winners seems like a real piece of work. Who the hell thought it would be a good idea to give this person any kind of security clearance?

EDIT: "Being white is terrorism" hahahaha


Infowars is reliable media? Which conspiracy theory is it now?

I don't see any reliability problems when Infowars is citing and linking to Reality Winners' own social media. I would have thought that y'all would immediately be able to see the difference. My disappointment never ceases.


Sounds like it was well taken out of context though.

But there is truth to the idea that whiteness is complicit with white terrorists. I mean your very own lack of discussion on how these white men are being radicalized and turning to terrorists is indicative of your own complicity.

What was taken out of context? She told Kanye to go make a T-Shirt that says that "being white is terrorism." In light of all of the other shit that she tweeted, are we really going to pretend that she doesn't mean and believe precisely the obvious sentiment that is behind that phrase? You sure as shit wouldn't let a white person get away with telling someone to make a "being black is terrorism" T-Shirt --- and you would have no doubt what that white person meant if he also wore a white hood.


Generally when people suggest you put something on a T-Shirt they are being facetious. But "Being black is terrorism" has no basis, whereas "being white is terrorism" is a hyperbolic comment on a real issue.
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
a_flayer
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
Netherlands2826 Posts
June 06 2017 18:26 GMT
#155435
She protested against the electoral college on twitter. Sounds like a Russian agent to me.
When you came along so righteous with a new national hate, so convincing is the ardor of war and of men, it's harder to breathe than to believe you're a friend. The wars at home, the wars abroad, all soaked in blood and lies and fraud.
Karis Vas Ryaar
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
United States4396 Posts
June 06 2017 18:27 GMT
#155436
"I'm not agreeing with a lot of Virus's decisions but they are working" Tasteless. Ipl4 Losers Bracket Virus 2-1 Maru
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States24505 Posts
June 06 2017 18:28 GMT
#155437
On June 07 2017 03:26 LegalLord wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 07 2017 03:22 GreenHorizons wrote:
On June 07 2017 03:19 LegalLord wrote:
I perused just the twits myself. Those represent the kind of person who doesn't belong in intelligence.


That said, her incompetence regarding securing her own safety indicates she was likely there specifically because the military is so desperate for translators.

I checked their website and they happen to have an opening for her position right now.

I must have missed it, what languages does she speak?

That the intelligence branch needs more translators is quite apparent, that much is true.



Winner served as a linguist in the U.S. Air Force for six years and reportedly speaks three foreign languages fluently — Farsi, Dari, and Pashto.

Source
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
xDaunt
Profile Joined March 2010
United States17988 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-06-06 18:30:33
June 06 2017 18:29 GMT
#155438
On June 07 2017 03:26 GreenHorizons wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 07 2017 03:22 xDaunt wrote:
On June 07 2017 03:18 GreenHorizons wrote:
On June 07 2017 03:14 xDaunt wrote:
On June 07 2017 03:13 Neneu wrote:
On June 07 2017 03:02 xDaunt wrote:
Also, in case anyone missed this, Reality Winners seems like a real piece of work. Who the hell thought it would be a good idea to give this person any kind of security clearance?

EDIT: "Being white is terrorism" hahahaha


Infowars is reliable media? Which conspiracy theory is it now?

I don't see any reliability problems when Infowars is citing and linking to Reality Winners' own social media. I would have thought that y'all would immediately be able to see the difference. My disappointment never ceases.


Sounds like it was well taken out of context though.

But there is truth to the idea that whiteness is complicit with white terrorists. I mean your very own lack of discussion on how these white men are being radicalized and turning to terrorists is indicative of your own complicity.

What was taken out of context? She told Kanye to go make a T-Shirt that says that "being white is terrorism." In light of all of the other shit that she tweeted, are we really going to pretend that she doesn't mean and believe precisely the obvious sentiment that is behind that phrase? You sure as shit wouldn't let a white person get away with telling someone to make a "being black is terrorism" T-Shirt --- and you would have no doubt what that white person meant if he also wore a white hood.


Generally when people suggest you put something on a T-Shirt they are being facetious. But "Being black is terrorism" has no basis, whereas "being white is terrorism" is a hyperbolic comment on a real issue.

Yeah, try arguing that to all of the people who have their property destroyed whenever BLM get its vandalism on.
NewSunshine
Profile Joined July 2011
United States5938 Posts
June 06 2017 18:30 GMT
#155439
On June 07 2017 03:22 xDaunt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 07 2017 03:18 GreenHorizons wrote:
On June 07 2017 03:14 xDaunt wrote:
On June 07 2017 03:13 Neneu wrote:
On June 07 2017 03:02 xDaunt wrote:
Also, in case anyone missed this, Reality Winners seems like a real piece of work. Who the hell thought it would be a good idea to give this person any kind of security clearance?

EDIT: "Being white is terrorism" hahahaha


Infowars is reliable media? Which conspiracy theory is it now?

I don't see any reliability problems when Infowars is citing and linking to Reality Winners' own social media. I would have thought that y'all would immediately be able to see the difference. My disappointment never ceases.


Sounds like it was well taken out of context though.

But there is truth to the idea that whiteness is complicit with white terrorists. I mean your very own lack of discussion on how these white men are being radicalized and turning to terrorists is indicative of your own complicity.

What was taken out of context? She told Kanye to go make a T-Shirt that says that "being white is terrorism." In light of all of the other shit that she tweeted, are we really going to pretend that she doesn't mean and believe precisely the obvious sentiment that is behind that phrase? You sure as shit wouldn't let a white person get away with telling someone to make a "being black is terrorism" T-Shirt --- and you would have no doubt what that white person meant if he also wore a white hood.

You seem to care an awful lot more about Reality Winner's leak fumble, and apparently everything else she does in her free time, than about any concurrent stories. She made a move that was dumb, did it poorly, and is being punished, end of story.
"If you find yourself feeling lost, take pride in the accuracy of your feelings." - Night Vale
brian
Profile Blog Joined August 2004
United States9644 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-06-06 18:35:15
June 06 2017 18:31 GMT
#155440
On June 07 2017 03:22 xDaunt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 07 2017 03:18 GreenHorizons wrote:
On June 07 2017 03:14 xDaunt wrote:
On June 07 2017 03:13 Neneu wrote:
On June 07 2017 03:02 xDaunt wrote:
Also, in case anyone missed this, Reality Winners seems like a real piece of work. Who the hell thought it would be a good idea to give this person any kind of security clearance?

EDIT: "Being white is terrorism" hahahaha


Infowars is reliable media? Which conspiracy theory is it now?

I don't see any reliability problems when Infowars is citing and linking to Reality Winners' own social media. I would have thought that y'all would immediately be able to see the difference. My disappointment never ceases.


Sounds like it was well taken out of context though.

But there is truth to the idea that whiteness is complicit with white terrorists. I mean your very own lack of discussion on how these white men are being radicalized and turning to terrorists is indicative of your own complicity.

What was taken out of context? She told Kanye to go make a T-Shirt that says that "being white is terrorism." In light of all of the other shit that she tweeted, are we really going to pretend that she doesn't mean and believe precisely the obvious sentiment that is behind that phrase? You sure as shit wouldn't let a white person get away with telling someone to make a "being black is terrorism" T-Shirt --- and you would have no doubt what that white person meant if he also wore a white hood.


the sentiment obvious to everyone but you apparently is that she thinks kanye is a hyperbolic nutcase. how you ascribe this to her own beliefs on racism is the link everyone's missing man.

it's a pretty clear case of infowars deliberately misconstruing something. they did so fairly obviously by linking the source material, so i mean you can qualify the failure as 'misleading at best' if it makes a difference.

i mean to your own point we're arguing about the credibility of infowars, which i think by all measures is a waste of time. the source material is what's relevant. but if you're gonna misunderstand or misconstrue a tweet i guess it's on the table.
Prev 1 7770 7771 7772 7773 7774 10093 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 1h 53m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
ProTech35
StarCraft: Brood War
Calm 8243
Shuttle 1828
actioN 733
Horang2 627
Bisu 496
Larva 276
Zeus 168
Jaedong 121
HiyA 92
EffOrt 90
[ Show more ]
Noble 54
Yoon 42
Rush 37
Bale 32
Sharp 27
NaDa 25
sSak 22
Sacsri 21
Terrorterran 1
Dota 2
ODPixel459
monkeys_forever20
Counter-Strike
fl0m4429
Super Smash Bros
Westballz35
Other Games
summit1g9865
JimRising 451
XaKoH 326
WinterStarcraft303
Fuzer 158
Mew2King99
NeuroSwarm61
ViBE42
amsayoshi20
Railgan16
Organizations
Counter-Strike
PGL65
StarCraft: Brood War
UltimateBattle 32
[ Show 10 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• ChaeLyn 7
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Stunt553
Upcoming Events
IntoTheTV X SOOP
1h 53m
herO vs Solar
MaxPax vs SHIN
IPSL
7h 53m
Azhi_Dahaki vs ggnore13
Double vs WIZARD
BSL
10h 53m
Cross vs Puma
Artosis vs Spine
Replay Cast
13h 53m
Replay Cast
1d 13h
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2 days
WardiTV Invitational
2 days
YoungYakov vs Lambo
SHIN vs TBD
Percival vs Shameless
Solar vs TBD
PiGosaur Cup
2 days
The PondCast
4 days
KCM Race Survival
4 days
[ Show More ]
WardiTV Invitational
4 days
CranKy Ducklings
6 days
IPSL
6 days
TerrOr vs IJ_Terran
rasowy vs Hazorath
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-11-05
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
HCC Season 3

Ongoing

Acropolis #5
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 4
International ShieldBattery League
BSL Season 23
IPSL Winter 2026-27
Calamity Cup Div. A Season 8
IEM Beijing 2026
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 5
1win Private Club #2
Thunderpick World Champ. '26
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
1win Private Club #1
Logitech G Play Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #3
BLAST Open Fall 2026

Upcoming

Sector 951
SC4ALL II: Brood War
BSL 23: Non-Korean Championship
HSC XXX
Stellar Fest 2: Lunar Cup
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
Underdog Cup 2026 Div 2-3
PGL Bucharest 2027
BLAST Bounty Winter 2027
eXTREMESLAND 2026
PGL Major Singapore 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 6
BLAST Rivals Fall 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.